Using writing circles to enhance and document inquiry UCF literacy symposium 2014 Sherron Killingsworth Roberts
1. Using Writing Circles to Enhance and
Document Inquiry
Sherron Killingsworth Roberts, Ed.D.
Professor of Language Arts and Literacy
Sherron.roberts@ucf.edu
2014 Literacy Symposium
2. Using Writing Circles
as Collaborative Writing Groups
to Enhance and Document Inquiry
• GOALS FOR OUR SESSION:
• 1. Define writing circles and
collaborative writing groups
(Vopat, 2009).
• 2. Share the experiences of
implementing writing circles as
collaborative writing groups.
• 3. Provide relevant minilessons
/or writing activities to enhance
the process.
4. What are the components/contexts
that make writing so difficult?
One idea per slip
Generate as many as you can
5. Vote with your feet protocol:
Let’s try Four Corners
• #1: I don’t know much at all about writing circles at all.
• #2: I think I understand what writing circles are and I
can articulate a definition, but I’m really not sure how I
could make them work in inquiry groups.
• #3: I know and understand writing circles and inquiry
groups, but I’m not sure how to implement them.
• #4: I know and understand the essential qualities of
writing circles, I’m pretty sure I have ways to implement
them to enhance inquiry in my classroom
6. What are writing circles?
• Jim Vopat’s (2009) writing circles, similar in format and
function to literature circles, can easily be implemented with
inquiry groups.
• Writing circles are a group of writers who work and learn
together to help each other improve in writing.
• In writing circles, students write collaboratively to document
their learning on a particular topic.
7. Vopat’s great definition:
• “Small groups of students meeting regularly to share
drafts, choose common writing topics, practice positive
response, and in general, help each other become better
writers” (Vopat, 2009, p. 1).
8. Rationale
• Peer collaboration in writing has shown to be effective in
learning to write as well as writing to learn
(Graham, McKeown, Kiuhara & Harris, 2012;
MacArthur, Schwartz & Graham, 1991; Onrubia & Engel, 2009;
Stroch, 2005; Yarrow & Topping, 2001).
• Collaborative writing or writing circles may effectively span
from elementary students through to graduate
students, starting with
prewriting, drafting, revising, editing, and moving to
submission and possible publication.
• Creating positive and effective writers is best facilitated by
engaging in authentic writing experiences
(Graves, 1983, 1994; Murray, 2003)
9. Invigorating experimentation
• My students faces
grinned widely when
they noticed literature
circles on the syllabus,
• because they had been
exposed to this format in
earlier coursework.
• However, when I
explained the concept of
collaborative writing
through writing circles,
some faces looked a bit
nervous. One group even
named themselves the
Worry Warts.
• This presentation
attempts to tell the story
of my students evolving
as writers through a new
strategy called writing
circles.
10. Essential elements of CIRCLES
• Collaboration
• Social language
• Small groups based
on interest
• Choice is essential
• Flexible and
temporary grouping,
not based on ability
• Think of Lit
Circles, and imagine
Writing Circles…
• What do you imagine
the essential
elements of Writing
Circles to be?
11. Vopat includes these elements:
• Groups of students name their
writing circle and choose their
group’s writing topic.
• Kids write on this topic, using
any format or genre.
• Writing circle minilessons focus
on writing craft.
• Kids share their writing;
respond to each other’s writing.
• Students reflect about the
writing circle sessions and
record their notes in their
writing circle notebook.
• Writers participate in a circle
devoted to collaborative
revision, editing, and
publication.
12. --Generating ideas & forming
groups (Roberts)
--or forming groups & generating
ideas (Vopat, 2009)?
----WHICH came first?
• As a whole, the class generated a list of ten to twelve possible
ideas, and I asked for a volunteer who was passionate about
one of the topics on the board.
• And, then proceeded to see if we had enough people to form
a viable group of about five to seven members.
13. Getting started
in Writing Circles
• Vopat did, however, think of practical components that I
would have overlooked:
• 1. We need a NAME!
• 2. We need a folder with pockets for each group!
• 3. Discuss why you chose this group…
14. Enhancing & documenting
inquiry
• What are some areas
of inquiry that this
might work in your
classroom?
• FIRST ASSIGNMENT:
Bring an article or
book about the
chosen topic to
share with your new
group!
• Start a reference
sheet.
• Start a list of other
information needed;
assign these.
15. Some helps along the way…
• Affinity exercise with
post-its
• Move to web,
mindmap,
bubblemap, outline
• Avoid intro & concl
• Launch in the body,
assigning parts.
16. • Think audience
• Think authenticity
• Think dynamic
• Think formats that
might offer a new
perspective or
dimension
17. Schedule for writing circles:
• 5-10 min of minilesson
• 10-20 min of application &
planning
• Teacher walking &
facilitating process
• It’s about the process!!
• It’s not about product
yet!
• Generating a stmt of the
problem—Find the focus.
• Writing-go-round!
• Transitions & guiding
sentences
• Effectively using subtitles
• Erradicting Empty Words
• Adding details that breath
life into the topic
• Setting up googledocs
• Using accurate language
aligned throughout
• Titles* echo, echo, echo…
• Writing a compelling intro
• Creating a strong finish
• Writing a cover letter
19. What’s it really all about?
• Take a lesson from
Kurt Vonnegut’s
Seven Deceptively
Simple Principles:
20. “No one will carehow wellor how badlyhe
expressedhimself,
if he did not have perfectlyenchanting
things to say.”
• 1. Find a subject you care about.
• 2. Do not ramble, though.
• 3. Keep it simple.
• 4. Have the guts to cut.
• 5. Sound like yourself.
• 6. Say what you mean to say.
• 7. Pity the readers*.
• “our audience requires us to be sympathetic and patient teachers,
ever willing to simplify and clarify… while we would rather ‘soar’
high above the crowd, singing like nightingales.”
21. Revisiting Four Corners:
Vote with your feet protocol
• #1: I don’t know much at all about writing circles at all.
• #2: I think I understand what writing circles are and I can
articulate a definition, but I’m really not sure how I could
make them work in inquiry groups.
• #3: I know and understand writing circles and inquiry groups,
but I’m not sure how to implement them.
• #4: I know and understand the essential qualities of writing
circles, I’m pretty sure I have ways to implement them to
enhance inquiry in my classroom
23. APPLICATIONS TO SHARE!
• One step at a time! What could be better?
• “Novelists have, on the average, about the same IQs as the
cosmetic consultants at Bloomingdale’s department store.
Our power is patience. We have discovered that writing
allows even a stupid person to seem halfway intelligent, if
only that person will write the same thought over and over
again, improving it just a little bit each time. It is a lot like
inflating a blimp with a bicycle pump. Anybody can do it. All it
takes is time.” K. Vonnegut
Hinweis der Redaktion
Tie to inquiry groups in science, social studies, art…Affinity exercise here… how might we address these categories?
Peer collaboration in writing has been shown to be effective for Learning to Write and Writing to Learn (Graham, McKeown, Kiuhara, & Harris, 2012; MacArthur, Schwartz, & Graham, 1991; Onrubia & Engel, 2009; Storch, 2005; Yarrow &Topping, 2001). That is why collaborative writing is often implemented in educational contexts. However, not only in educational contexts but also in professional contexts (academia, policy making, administration, journalism) collaborative writing has become common practice. Very frequently, written documents are the end-product of a collaborative process involving multiple actors, writers and readers ( e.g. research articles; group proposals, public policy documents; journalistic texts (Perrin, 2011; Lowry, Albrecht, Nunanmaker, & Lee, 2003; Sleurs, Jacobs, & Van Waes, 2003). However, for peer collaboration to have a positive effect on either writing or learning outcomes, a few conditions need to be met. One of the crucial factors determining the effectiveness of peer collaboration in revision in an educational context for example is instruction and/or support (Min, 2005; Van Steendam, Rijlaarsdam, Sercu, & Van den Bergh, 2010). Another important component for peer collaboration in writing may be group composition (Patchan, Hawk, Stevens, & Schunn, 2012; Van Steendam, Rijlaarsdam, & Van den Bergh in press). It is the complex interplay of individual, collaborative and contextual factors in collaborative writing and revision that we want to look at in this special issue. More specifically, the special issue aims at providing an overview of the most recent findings about collaborative writing and revision. Collaboration is conceptualized as either pupils or students, from primary school children to higher education students, or adult professionals writing (planning, composing, revising) collaboratively, either in a face-to-face context or online (via e-learning). We welcome both quantitative and qualitative studies that investigate peer collaboration in the context of writing (planning, drafting, revising) in three domains: Learning to Write in L1 and L2, Writing to Learn and Workplace Writing (technical and professional communication). Studies on Learning to Write and Workplace Writing should include the effect of peer collaboration on the writing product and/or writing process and writing-to-learn studies should (also) test the effect on learning processes and/or outcomes (domain knowledge). Additionally, also studies which shed light on methodological issues are invited. Ideally, the different contributions will result in a blueprint for effective and efficient collaborative writing. We are especially interested in studies investigating one or more of the following:- effective instructional strategies and/or scripting in collaborative writing- (effective) interaction (interactional patterns) in collaborative writing- effects of group composition in collaborative writing- effects of individual characteristics in collaborative writing- effects of task (e.g. task complexity) on collaboration processes and quality of processes and the resulting writing product - any combination of one or more of the previous factors
Tried so many different paths to effective writing instruction: writing workshop, minilessons,modelling, and drafting…. But we just
in much the same way that I form lit circles after giving book talks.
There are /it is /qualifiers
titles
Vonnegut said, When I write , I feel like an armless , legless man with a crayon in my mouth..Cat’s Cradle //slaughterhouse Five
What makes this so difficult? How can writing circles help with inquiry groups?