Anzeige
Anzeige

Más contenido relacionado

Anzeige
Anzeige

Acetabulum Fracture

  1. Acetabulum Fracture Dr Sijan Bhattachan 3rd year resident Orthopaedics & Trauma Surgery, NAMS
  2. Introduction • Treatment of acetabular fractures is a complex area of orthopaedics that is being continually refined. • Caused by high energy trauma and associated injuries are frequent. • Management of entire patient should follow accepted ATLS protocol.
  3. Anatomy • Acetabulum; Incomplete hemispherical socket with an inverted horseshoe shaped articular surface surrounding the nonarticular cotyloid fossa. • Articular socket supported by two columns of bone, described by Letournel and Judet as an inverted Y.
  4. Columns
  5. Dome
  6. Quadrilateral Plate
  7. • Sciatic nerve & Superior gluteal vessels
  8. Corona Mortis
  9. Mechanism of injury • Impact of femoral head with acetabular articular surface
  10. Radiographic evaluation • AP view • Judet views (45 degrees oblique views) -Iliac oblique view -Obturator oblique view
  11. Roof Arc • Matta et al developed a system for roughly quantifying the acetabular dome after fracture, which they called the ‘Roof arc” measurement.
  12. • Determines if the remaining intact acetabulum is sufficient to maintain a stable and congruous relationship with femoral head. • If any of the roof arc measurements in a displaced fracture are less than 45 degrees, operative treatment should be considered
  13. • CT scan is invaluable in the treatment of acetabular fractures.
  14. Classification • Letournel & Judet;
  15. Posterior Wall Fracture • 25% of all acetabular fractures
  16. Posterior Column Fracture
  17. Both column Fracture • 23% of all acetabular fractures • Acetabulum completely disconnected from axial skeleton. • Central dislocation of femoral head
  18. • Spur Sign; External cortex of most caudal portion of intact ilium.
  19. • Secondary congruence
  20. Treatment Protocol • Radiographs allow proper fracture classification • Fracture location and displacement determine need for surgery • Fracture Pattern determines Approach.
  21. Non Operative ; Indications • Nondisplaced and minimally displaced fractures (<2 mm) • Fractures with significant displacement but in which the region of the joint involved is judged to be unimportant prognostically (roof arc). • Secondary congruence in displaced both column fractures • Medical contraindications to surgery • Local soft tissue problems, such as infection, wounds and soft tissue lesions • Elderly patients with osteoporotic bone in whom open reduction may not be feasible
  22. Non Operative Treatment Techniques; • Bed Rest with joint mobilisation. • When there is adequate fracture healing , usually by 6-12 weeks , gradually progress to full weight bearing.. • Prolonged traction treatment for those patients with operative indications related to fracture displacement but having contraindications to surgical intervention.
  23. Indications for operative treatment Fracture characteristics: • With 2 mm or more of displacement in the dome of acetabulum as defined by any roof arc measurements of less than 45 degrees • any subluxation of the femoral head from a displaced acetabular fracture noted on any of the three standard radiographic views • Posterior wall fractures with more than 50% involvement of the articular surface of the posterior wall. • Incarcerated fragments in the acetabulum after closed reduction of hip dislocation
  24. • Urgent surgical interventions -Irreducible hip dislocation -Open fracture -Vascular compromise -Worsening neurologic deficit • No delay beyond 15 days for elementary fractures and 10 days for associated types
  25. Surgical Approach • Anterior -Ilioinguinal -Modified Stoppa • Posterior (Kocher-Langenbeck approach) • Extensile approaches -Extended iliofemoral -Triradiate approach -T approach • Combined Anterior & Posterior Approach
  26. Selection of Surgical approach • Fracture type • Elapsed time from injury to operative intervention • Magnitude and location of maximal fracture displacement
  27. Fracture Reduction & Fixation; • First reduce and stabilise the displaced columns , if present and then reduce any wall fracture. • After definitive fixation of the reduced fragments, the entire construct is stabilised with buttress plates.
  28. Percutaneous Treatment • Mini open exposure through lateral window of ilioinguinal incision. Indications; • To prevent potential further fracture displacement. • Displaced fractures in elderly. • Simple fractures with minimal displacement • As an adjunct to standard ORIF techniques • Severe injuries that prevent formal ORIF
  29. Kocher-Langenbeck Approach • Indications;
  30. Dissection
  31. Complications; • Infection • Sciatic nerve palsy • Heterotopic ossification
  32. Special considerations • Transecting the piriformis & obturator internus tendons 1.5 cm from GT. • Quadratus femoris & obturator externus intact. • Sciatic nerve directly visualised & protected; Recognize anatomical variations.
  33. • Sciatic nerve & Piriformis;
  34. Ilioinguinal Approach • Developed by Letournel after extensive cadaveric anatomical study. • Indications;
  35. Access
  36. Dissection
  37. • Iliopectineal fascia separates Lacuna musculorum and Lacuna vasorum.
  38. • 3 windows;
  39. Complications; • Infection • Femoral nerve palsy • Injury to Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve • Vascular injury
  40. Modified Stoppa Approach • Exposes internal surface of the anterior column and the quadrilateral surface. • It can be used for many fractures previously treated through ilioinguinal approach.
  41. Dissection
  42. • Use of Stoppa Approach with the Lateral window of the ilioinguinal approach has been promoted as a way of avoiding the dissection of the middle window of the ilioinguinal approach and thus exposure of femoral vessels and nerve.
  43. Complications • Overall mortality rates (0 - 2.5%) • Post traumatic arthritis & osteonecrosis of femoral head • Infections • Sciatic nerve palsy (10-15% ;2-6%) • Heterotopic ossification • Thromboembolic complications • Intra articular hardware
  44. THR • In older patients with extremely poor prognoses. • Indications include intraarticular comminution, full thickness abrasive loss of articular cartilage, impaction of femoral head, impaction of dome, associated femoral neck fracture and preexistent arthritis. • Fractures can be fixed with percutaneous screws, plates or cables and fixation augmented with multiple screw fixation of the ingrowth cup.
  45. • 45 yr/M ; Left Acetabulum Fracture
  46. • Modified Stoppa with lateral window of Ilioinguinal Approach
  47. References • Campbell’s operative orthopaedics, 13th edition. • Rockwood & Green’s Fractures in Adults, 8th edition. • OTA lecture series III (Acetabulum Fracture).
Anzeige