This document discusses different types of evaluation and test items used in education. It describes formative evaluation as used to provide feedback during instruction, while summative evaluation determines if instructional objectives were achieved and is used for grading. Objective test items include supply, selection, and matching questions, while short answer questions assess a few key points and essays measure higher-order thinking. Standardized tests have established norms and procedures, whereas teacher-made tests focus on class-specific content and objectives.
3. Evaluation
Is a process wherein the parts, processes, or
outcomes of a programme are examined to see
whether they are satisfactory, particulary with
reference to the programme’s stated objectives, or
some of the standard of excellence
4. Purpose of evaluation (N.M. Downie)
1. Providing information for grading, promoting
students and reporting to parents
2. Evaluating the effectiveness of a teaching method
3. Motivating the students
4. Selecting the students
5. Evaluating the entire educational institution and to
show various aspects of it could be improved
6. Collecting information for effective educational and
vocational counseling
6. Formative evaluation
Used to monitor the progress made during
instruction
To provide continuous feedback to both teacher
and student
7. Summative evaluation
To determine the extent to which the
instructional objectives have been achieved
Used to assign grades and certificates to students
Provide information for judging the
appropriateness of the course objectives and the
effectiveness of the instruction
8. Distinction between formative and summative
evaluation
To determine the degree
of mastery of a given task
Tests given regularly
during the course
Limited to check the
ability to apply a given
principle to a new
situation
Limited to a selected
situations
To assess larger and
more general outcomes
of learning
Tests at the end of the
course
Asses the ability to apply
a skill in a variety of
situations
Number of items – larger
Validity, reliability are
established
10. Test items
Evaluation tools
Construction of a good test item is challenging
Good test item needs subject knowledge along with
techniques of writing test items
11. Preparation of test items
Measure what students know, not what they do not
know
Simple, precise and easily comprehensible items
Item should demand specific answers
Give clear directions
Use simple language
12. Criterion Referenced Test (CRT) and
Norm Referenced Test (NRT)
1. CRT determine whether
each student has
achieved specific skills
or concepts
2. To find out how many
students know before
instruction begins and
after it has finished
3. Measures specific skills
which make up a
designed curriculum
1. NRT rank each student
with respect to the
achievement of others
in broad areas of
knowledge
2. Discriminate between
high and low achievers
3. Measures broad skill
areas sampled from a
variety of text books
and syllabi
13. Criterion Referenced Test (CRT) and
Norm Referenced Test (NRT)
4. Parallel difficulty
5. Each student is
compared with a preset
standard for acceptable
achievement
6. Score in percentage
7. Each skill is tested by at
least four items
8. Help to eliminate
competition and
improve cooperation
4. Items vary in difficulty
5. Each student is
compared with other
examinees and assigned
a score
6. Score in percentile
7. Each skill is tested by
less than four items
8. Useful for student
placement and
advancement
14. Two types of achievement test
Teacher made test
Oral test
Written test
Practical test
Standardized test
15. Types of written test items
Objective type
Short answer type
Essay type
16. Objective type
Response is objective
Fixed response item
Respondent cannot deviate from a definite
answer
17. Types of objective type items
Two types
Supply type test item (Recall type)
Simple recall type
Completion type
Selection type test item (Recognition type)
Alternate response type
Multiple choice test item
Matching type test items
18. Short answer type questions
Question based on a few value points on a
particular aspect or concept
Reduces the subjectivity through indicating the
expected direction of answer
Eg: Write three advantages of planning lesson.
19. Merits of short answer type
Easy to prepare
Suitable to all types of content including
diagram, graph, and sketches
No scope for guessing
Can make more objective by fixing the value
points
Demerits of short answer type
• Higher mental abilities cannot be evaluated
• Much emphasis on rote learning
20. Essay type
Essential component of higher education
Descriptive answering
To measure the memory, communication skill,
subject mastery and analytical ability of students
Evaluation of higher order thinking is possible
Two forms- question form and statement form
21. Merits of essay type items
Promote critical evaluation
Enhances the organizational skill, ability to justify,
and substantiate
Proves the presentation of arguments
Easy to prepare and administer
• Suitable for selective contents only
• Requires elaborate value points
Demerits of essay type
22. Standardized test
Comprises carefully selected items having being
given to a number of sample or groups under
standard conditions for which norms have been
established after careful evaluation
A standardized test is standardized in terms of
Form and construction
In the way of administration
In the use of norms
23. Difference between teacher made test and
standardized test
Teacher made test
Based on content and
objectives specific to the
class
May deal either with a
specific limited topic or
skill or with large
segments of knowledge
and skill
Developed by a single
teacher
Has fair reliability
Limited usually to the
class or school
Standardized test
Based on content and objectives
common to many schools over a
wide area
Deals with large segments of
knowledge or skill, usually only
with a few items appraising any
one skill or topic
Develop with the help of
experts
Has high reliability
Provides norms for various
groups that are broadly
representative of performance
throughout the country