Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Die SlideShare-Präsentation wird heruntergeladen. ×

Types of auditor

Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Nächste SlideShare
Auditing
Auditing
Wird geladen in …3
×

Hier ansehen

1 von 6 Anzeige

Weitere Verwandte Inhalte

Diashows für Sie (20)

Ähnlich wie Types of auditor (20)

Anzeige

Weitere von WINNERbd.it (20)

Types of auditor

  1. 1. Types of auditor: Achievement An auditor is a person who reports on the accounts of an undertaking or enterprise. Auditors can be classified under four headings. They are: External Auditors: An external auditor perform independent third-party reviews all the financial records of a company or corporation. He evaluates all Accounting payroll and purchasing records, as well as any documents related to investment, stock on loans. Internal Auditors: An employee of a company changed with providing Independent and objective evaluation of the company financial and operational business activities. Including its corporate governance, partnership government agencies. Government Auditors: Auditors employed by the government are called government auditors. They are employed by state and local agencies. Because they internally. Forensic Auditors: They are employed by the corporation, government Agencies public accounting firms, and consulting and investigative services firms. They are trained in detecting, investigating, and deterring fraud and white-collar crime. Generally accepted Auditing Practice: Auditing is a process by which a competent independent person accumulates and evaluates evidence about various assertions contained in financial statement of an entity for the purpose of determining and reporting the e quality of disclosure of financial
  2. 2. information judging them against how it is found out Auditing is not sweaty search with any foregone conclusion .Nor does it end abruptly with any accidental catch in the audit mesh. Essentially auditing is a process, a Professional exercise, conforming to the quality parameters of generally accepted auditing is a process a professional exercise conforming to the quality parameters of generally accepted auditing Practices. What is “generally accepted auditing standards” cannot be easily defined. Yet it is important one must have understanding of what the term may connote. It implies, among other things the following: Only knowledgeable and independent person carries out the audit. In performing audit the works is well planned and supervise. Sufficient and appropriate audit evidence are gathered and tested before an opinion is farmed. Proper judgment is made of financial statements under audit in the light of professional knowledge of auditor concerning generally accepted accounting practices, special enactments affecting the financial statement, pronouncements of professional bodies having bearing on them. Audit Evidence: An auditor must gather sufficient and appropriate audits evidenced and test them to make judgment of opinion. In this, there have two issues:  What evidence will be relevant to assess with greater reliability?  How much evidence is to be obtained? To obtain sufficient appropriate evidence the auditors have to perform two things: 1. Compliance procedures. 2. Substantive procedures.
  3. 3. Compliance procedures: In big organization, transactions may be voluminous and repetitive .if those transactions occur systematically within in built checks and balances, it would be unnecessary to verify all the transactions to assess what theses transactions signify. Quite a few transactions, if checked would tell what all transactions of the type seek to signify. Compliance procedures seek to test, those are given bellow:  The Internal control exists.  The internal control is effective.  The internal control has so operated throughout the period of audit with continuity. An auditor carries out compliance observation of the system , eliciting responses to his enquiry form clients, making critical look of the fact against the back drop of control criteria. Substantive procedures: By performing compliance procedures, the auditor finds out the efficiency of internal control system. If for instance, the internal control system is found to be effective, can auditor take that all assertions given by the financial statements are true and fair? While existence of good internal control system adds reliability to audit evidence, in can not dispense with checking evidence to substantiate data generated within the system .
  4. 4. In these transactions communicate one or more of the following assertions in financial statements viz.  Existence: That an assets/ liability exists.  Rights and obligations: That the enterprise has right over the asset or has obligation over the liability.  Completeness: That all transactions / asset / liability find place in financial statements without omission.  Valuation: The monetary values attached to asset or liability is correct or fair.  Measurement: that a transaction is recorded in proper amount. For e.g. freight paid to bringing machinery is included in transaction pertaining to installation. Revenue or expense is properly allocated to the period e.g.: per- paid expenses accrued income.  Disclosure: Data is disclosed according accounting convention statutory requirement. Those seven assertions of financial data may be correct or not. A financial statement may depict a leasehold right as a freehold right. The auditor has to check to get assurance that these assertions are fairly represented in the financial statements. To do this, performance substantive procedure. Test Check: In big business houses where the number of transaction to be checked is very large and time at the deposal of the auditor is little, a few transactions may be checked at random. such a cheek is called test check. All the transaction need not be checked. The method of checking the accounts will minimize the work of the auditor. Professor Meig defines:
  5. 5. “Testing and test checking means to select and examine a representative sample from a larger number of similar items” For example while vouching the credit sales a few transaction say for a week per month may be checked or the transaction for a few months selected at random may be checked. Again the auditor may check all the transaction for any month may be checked. If the transactions so checked are all correct and there is no doubt of any error or fraud. Therefore the auditor should be very careful in relying upon the test Check. He should apply these checks if he is fully satisfied that the internal check system prevalent is efficient and no suspicion arises in his mind. Precaution to be taken while applying Test Checks:  Entries of every description should be checked.  Selection of entries to be checked should be at random.  Periods and entries selected for the test check should be different at each audit. For Example: The credit sales for the months of July and December were checked during the year 1994. Credit sales for other months except July and December should be checked for the year 1995.  A large number of entries of the first and the last month of the audit period should be checked.  The test check should be so arranged that the work done by every clerk is checked.
  6. 6.  Test check should be applied to cash book where every transaction should be checked.

×