he Agenda Setting process has been studied extensively and meta-analyses have consistently found relationships between the media, public and political agendas. However, before studying the interactions of different agendas, they have to be thoroughly operationalized and described. For media and political agendas, studies have relied mostly on manual content analyses, yet these approaches are very labor extensive, thereby only capturing only parts of party or media communication. The goal of this paper is to offer a new method of measuring agendas by using a broader set of public communication with a replicable and scalable computational approach. Specifically, this study contributes to this methodological challenge by proposing the use of neural networks to measure political parties’ agendas.
Several recent studies have demonstrated the useful applicability of computational approaches to study agenda-setting processes, yet the importance of careful application and validation has also been emphasized. A political, symbolic agenda can be defined as “the list of issues to which political actors pay attention” and measured by looking at issues a party talks about. Using neural networks, we propose to employ unsupervised machine learning for calculating vector representations of words or documents and locating them in a semantic space to describe parties' political agendas. Parties have many possibilities to reach different audiences, the sum of which will serve as a proxy of a party’s public agenda. Thus, we purposely take a cross-domain approach and include multiple text kinds. Publicly available press releases, parliamentary speeches, and Facebook and Twitter posts of Austrian parties from the last ten years will be used to study how the parties’ public agendas differ regarding a) the topics present and b) the words most closely connected to them.
This study goes beyond studying limited timeframes, types of communication, or predefined topics, and consequently will lead to a more encompassing and accurate description of agendas.