Macro Game Theory is the complete opposite of Prof. John Nash's 'microcosm' where in very specific instances - everybody will win something. The Macrocosmic Game Theory by Andrew Hennessey is an opportunity - given colours can be numbers - to look at how massive and complex systems can be manipulated to produce a desired result. i.e. a game theory of the type 'somebody could win 'everything'' - for some that is a colourful idea !! Although self-evident and independent of the 'Threeness metaphysics/physics' called TRE - it could be a powerful tool if the TRE Knowledge Representation System was harnessed

1. MACRO GAME THEORY
‘Somebody wins everything ..’
ANDREW HENNESSEY

2. The Human Race Mimics Nature
Builds walls
Around assets
The organs of state
such as church, palace,
stronghold etc look
like the organelles of a
plant or animal cell.

3. Core, Infrastructure & Periphery
Analogy between
Biology and Sociology

4. Other assumptions of Model
Natural analogies
Spectrum ROYGBIV
Low frequency to high
The Difference Clouds
filter uses random (chaos)
generated values that vary
between the foreground
and background colour
Differences are high frequ.
Contradictions/Dialectic

16. Somebody wins everything ?
Dialectic is good – it generates diversity
Too much un-regulation causes blurring of
boundaries – therefore order and pattern
needs to be refreshed periodically
With dialectic - a temporary cycling
between differing good states occurs
Too much regulation and sameness drives
down the quality and diversity of
expression.

17. Monotony drives us down

18. Discourse takes us up Spectrum

19. Diversity & Discourse = Change

20. Cycle between Green/Blue/Green

21. Eventually dark and muddy
Loses its distinct
pattern
Gets dark and muddy
Needs refreshed and
re-instated by
regularity

22. How to use this model
When to input
sameness or
contradiction
When to be market-
ready for monotony or
diversity
When and How to
evaluate the pitch of a
political campaign