SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 43
1 What the Department of Labor Has to Say About the Assessments You Use Steve Kohr, Managing Director Steve@TheEmployersEdge.com
2 US Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration 2000 Publication
3 DOL Summary 81 pages 13 Assessment Principles Chapter 9 = Main Points – Guide Review Free Download (Adobe) http://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/empTestAsse.pdf
4  DOL: PURPOSE OF BOOK To Maximize RIGHT FIT between Jobs & Employees To Improve Assessment Efficiency and Effectiveness To Interpret Results Accurately To Understand Professional and Legal Standards
5 DOL Special Notice “Material in this publication is in the public domain and may be reproduced, fully or partially, without permission from the federal government. Source credit is requested but not required. Permission is required only to reproduce any copyrighted material contained herein.”
6 DOL: Assessments Defined “Any test or procedure used to measure and individual’s employment or career as related to qualifications & interests can be considered a personnel assessment tool.”
7 Assessments  Mental/physical ability*  Achievement tests Biodata inventories Employment interviews* Personality inventories* Honesty & integrity*      measures Education  Experience  Recommendations & reference checks* Assessment centers Medical examinations Drug and alcohol tests *The Employer’s Edge has tools designed for these purposes
8 DOL on Benefits of Using Assessments Reduce High Employee Turnover Improve Hiring Decisions Eliminate Employee Errors Reduce Absenteeism Improve Productivity Meet Legal and Professional Standards
9 Department of Labor’s AnEmployer’s Guide to 13 Principles Use only in a purposeful manner Use a ‘Whole person’ approach Unbiased & fair to all groups Reliable instruments & procedures Demonstrated valid for the specific purpose for which they are being used Appropriate for the target population
10 Understandable & comprehensive documentation  Staff are properly trained Testing conditions are suitable for all test takers  Reasonable accommodation for disabilities  Instrument security  Confidentiality of assessment results  Scores are interpreted properly Department of Labor’s AnEmployer’s Guide to Good Practices
11 1. Use assessment tools in a purposeful manner Know what you want to accomplish & why Select a tool(s) that will get you the information you are wanting
12 Inappropriate Use “Assessment instruments can be counter productive when used inappropriately. Inappropriate use stems from not having a clear understanding of what you want to measure and why you want to measure it. Having a clear understanding of the purpose of your assessment system is important is selecting the appropriate assessment tools to meet that purpose.
13 2. Use the whole person approach All assessment tools are subject to errors. Do NOT expect any test or procedure to measure a personal trait or ability with perfect accuracy for every single person.   Do NOT expect any test or procedure to be completely accurate in predicting performance.
14 ‘whole person’ approach “Using a single test or procedure will provide you with a limited view of a person’s employment qualifications. Using a variety of assessment tools (whole-person approach)will help educe the number of selection errors  made and will boost the effectiveness of your decision making.” Source: Testing and Assessment: An Employer’s Guide to Good Practices U.S. Dept of Labor 1999
15 What to look for in a test? Relevant Information Convenience based on your needs Administration (paper/pencil • on-screen) Analysis (fax back • software • internet) User Friendly Report Feedback Cost effective Potential for adverse impact?
16 4. Use only reliable assessment instruments & procedures Reliability The ability of an instrument to measure consistently & with relative absence of error. The higher the reliability confident, the more confidence you can have in the score. A reliable instrument  is NOT always valid.
17 Reliability .90 and up……Excellent! .80-.89……… Good .70-.79……… Adequate Below .70……May have                            limited applicability  Source: Testing and Assessment:An Employer’s Guide to Good Practices U.S. Dept of Labor 1999
18 5. Use only instruments valid for the specific purpose Validity Ability of an instrument to measure what it is intendedto measure. What does the instrument measure? How well does it measure it? A valid instrument is ALWAYS reliable.
19 Validity Defined “There’s a simple way to think about validity. In selecting or promoting employees, we want to answer one simple question:  Do people who do better on this test perform better on the job?” Hiring Great People McGraw-Hill, 1999 p.137
20 What to look for in a test?  High Validity .35 & Above…..very beneficial .21-.34…………likely to be useful .11-.20…………depends on  circumstances Below .11………unlikely to be useful Source: Testing and Assessment:An Employer’s Guide to Good Practices  U.S. Dept. of Labor 1999
21 Selection Methods Validity Cognitive Ability		.54 Job Tryout			.44 Personality			.38 Reference Check		.26 Experience			.18 Interview				.14 source: Hunter & Hunter
22 6.  Use assessment tools that are appropriate for the target population. No two assessments are alike!!!
23 Pros                    ConsHonest/Integrity No adverse impact Demonstrated validity Easy to administer Inexpensive to administer Privacy ? Faking possible Interpretation Not for current employees State regulations
24 Pros                    ConsAbility Tests Most useful performance predictors Easy to administer Inexpensive to administer Can result in high adverse impact Physical ability test costly to develop & administer
25 Pros                    ConsAchievement Tests Job Knowledge/Work Sample = high validity Easy to administer Inexpensive to administer Less adverse impact Written tests result in adverse impact Work sample tests – expensive to develop
26 Pros                    ConsBio – Data Inventories Easy to administer Inexpensive to administer Validity evidence Can reduce adverse impact w/ other assessments Privacy concerns Faking
27 Pros                       ConsInterviews ,[object Object]
May reduce adverse impact if used with other tests
Unstructured interviews typically have poor validity
Skill of interviewer is critical to the quality of the interviewSource: Testing and Assessment:  An Employer’s Guide to Good Practices U.S. Dept of Labor 1999
28 Pros                     ConsPersonality Testing ,[object Object]
Predictive validity evidence exists
May help reduce adverse impact with other tests
distinguish b/ clinical & employment oriented
Faking possible
invasion of privacy concernSource: Testing and Assessment:  An Employer’s Guide  to Good Practices   U.S. Dept of Labor 1999
29 Pros                 ConsEducation & Experience Requirements ,[object Object]
guard against gross mismatch or incompetence
In some cases, it is difficult to demonstrate job relatedness and business necessity of education and experience requirementsSource: Testing and Assessment:An Employer’s Guide to Good Practices U.S. Dept of Labor 1999
30 Pros                  ConsRecommendations & Reference Checks ,[object Object]
Can serve as protection against potential negligent hiring lawsuits
May encourage more accurate information
Reports almost always positive; they do not help differentiate between good workers and poor workersSource: Testing and Assessment: An Employer’s Guide to Good Practices  U.S. Dept of Labor 1999

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Fact-Finding + the Lean Six Sigma World
Fact-Finding + the Lean Six Sigma WorldFact-Finding + the Lean Six Sigma World
Fact-Finding + the Lean Six Sigma World
Steven Norton
 
Dessler ch 04-job analysis
Dessler ch 04-job analysisDessler ch 04-job analysis
Dessler ch 04-job analysis
Shamsil Arefin
 

Was ist angesagt? (14)

Rik Teuben - Many Can Quarrel, Fewer Can Argue
Rik Teuben - Many Can Quarrel, Fewer Can Argue Rik Teuben - Many Can Quarrel, Fewer Can Argue
Rik Teuben - Many Can Quarrel, Fewer Can Argue
 
Facts finding techniques in Database
Facts finding techniques in Database Facts finding techniques in Database
Facts finding techniques in Database
 
Dessler 06
Dessler 06Dessler 06
Dessler 06
 
Evidence-based decision-making in organizations: Why we need it and why some...
Evidence-based decision-making in organizations:  Why we need it and why some...Evidence-based decision-making in organizations:  Why we need it and why some...
Evidence-based decision-making in organizations: Why we need it and why some...
 
Training module on facing audits
Training module on   facing auditsTraining module on   facing audits
Training module on facing audits
 
Health Safety and Environment test for Operatives and Specialists
Health Safety and Environment test for Operatives and SpecialistsHealth Safety and Environment test for Operatives and Specialists
Health Safety and Environment test for Operatives and Specialists
 
Software testing
Software testingSoftware testing
Software testing
 
Rapid Software Testing: Strategy
Rapid Software Testing: StrategyRapid Software Testing: Strategy
Rapid Software Testing: Strategy
 
Shrini Kulkarni - Software Metrics - So Simple, Yet So Dangerous
Shrini Kulkarni -  Software Metrics - So Simple, Yet So Dangerous Shrini Kulkarni -  Software Metrics - So Simple, Yet So Dangerous
Shrini Kulkarni - Software Metrics - So Simple, Yet So Dangerous
 
Bohdan zinichenko rozsokha_shchukina
Bohdan zinichenko rozsokha_shchukinaBohdan zinichenko rozsokha_shchukina
Bohdan zinichenko rozsokha_shchukina
 
Fact-Finding + the Lean Six Sigma World
Fact-Finding + the Lean Six Sigma WorldFact-Finding + the Lean Six Sigma World
Fact-Finding + the Lean Six Sigma World
 
Dessler ch 04-job analysis
Dessler ch 04-job analysisDessler ch 04-job analysis
Dessler ch 04-job analysis
 
Hra 310 chapter 14
Hra 310 chapter 14Hra 310 chapter 14
Hra 310 chapter 14
 
Test design techniques
Test design techniquesTest design techniques
Test design techniques
 

Andere mochten auch

Spring Break 2010[2]
Spring Break 2010[2]Spring Break 2010[2]
Spring Break 2010[2]
guested33a9f
 
2008 TeensTALK
2008 TeensTALK2008 TeensTALK
2008 TeensTALK
Stamats
 
Texas Star Chart
Texas Star ChartTexas Star Chart
Texas Star Chart
boombie2001
 

Andere mochten auch (13)

Brasil Ross 2011
Brasil Ross 2011Brasil Ross 2011
Brasil Ross 2011
 
Spring Break 2010[2]
Spring Break 2010[2]Spring Break 2010[2]
Spring Break 2010[2]
 
Manifesto día do libro 2010
Manifesto día do libro 2010Manifesto día do libro 2010
Manifesto día do libro 2010
 
2008 TeensTALK
2008 TeensTALK2008 TeensTALK
2008 TeensTALK
 
New York Times VOD
New York Times VODNew York Times VOD
New York Times VOD
 
Beacon Riverfest
Beacon RiverfestBeacon Riverfest
Beacon Riverfest
 
HARE 2010 Review
HARE 2010 ReviewHARE 2010 Review
HARE 2010 Review
 
Carapuchiña
CarapuchiñaCarapuchiña
Carapuchiña
 
A entrada na Escola
A entrada na EscolaA entrada na Escola
A entrada na Escola
 
Associations
AssociationsAssociations
Associations
 
Texas Star Chart
Texas Star ChartTexas Star Chart
Texas Star Chart
 
Developing Sustainable Competitive Advantages for Colleges and Universities
Developing Sustainable Competitive Advantages for Colleges and UniversitiesDeveloping Sustainable Competitive Advantages for Colleges and Universities
Developing Sustainable Competitive Advantages for Colleges and Universities
 
Presentation
PresentationPresentation
Presentation
 

Ähnlich wie What the Department of Labor Says About the Assessments You Use

228 Chapter 8 • Measurementto collect more validation data mor.docx
228   Chapter 8 • Measurementto collect more validation data mor.docx228   Chapter 8 • Measurementto collect more validation data mor.docx
228 Chapter 8 • Measurementto collect more validation data mor.docx
eugeniadean34240
 
Introduction : Employee testing and selection
Introduction : Employee testing and selectionIntroduction : Employee testing and selection
Introduction : Employee testing and selection
Micha Paramitha
 
Testing Why Bother - Selection Testing
Testing Why Bother - Selection TestingTesting Why Bother - Selection Testing
Testing Why Bother - Selection Testing
Dr. Wm. (Chip) Valutis
 
The Selection Processinitial screening.docx
The Selection Processinitial screening.docxThe Selection Processinitial screening.docx
The Selection Processinitial screening.docx
ssusera34210
 
673Foundations of Psychological TestingNoel Hendrick.docx
673Foundations of Psychological TestingNoel Hendrick.docx673Foundations of Psychological TestingNoel Hendrick.docx
673Foundations of Psychological TestingNoel Hendrick.docx
alinainglis
 

Ähnlich wie What the Department of Labor Says About the Assessments You Use (20)

Selection tests in human resource management
Selection tests in human resource managementSelection tests in human resource management
Selection tests in human resource management
 
employee testing and selection-HRM
employee testing and selection-HRMemployee testing and selection-HRM
employee testing and selection-HRM
 
228 Chapter 8 • Measurementto collect more validation data mor.docx
228   Chapter 8 • Measurementto collect more validation data mor.docx228   Chapter 8 • Measurementto collect more validation data mor.docx
228 Chapter 8 • Measurementto collect more validation data mor.docx
 
Introduction : Employee testing and selection
Introduction : Employee testing and selectionIntroduction : Employee testing and selection
Introduction : Employee testing and selection
 
Testing Why Bother - Selection Testing
Testing Why Bother - Selection TestingTesting Why Bother - Selection Testing
Testing Why Bother - Selection Testing
 
Audits and Inspections by TMIC
Audits and Inspections by TMICAudits and Inspections by TMIC
Audits and Inspections by TMIC
 
Chapter 6.ppt
Chapter 6.pptChapter 6.ppt
Chapter 6.ppt
 
Hrm selecting employees
Hrm selecting employeesHrm selecting employees
Hrm selecting employees
 
The Selection Processinitial screening.docx
The Selection Processinitial screening.docxThe Selection Processinitial screening.docx
The Selection Processinitial screening.docx
 
Reliability Validity
Reliability ValidityReliability Validity
Reliability Validity
 
HRM_4th week
HRM_4th weekHRM_4th week
HRM_4th week
 
Selection
SelectionSelection
Selection
 
5 - Testing and Selection.pptx
5 - Testing and Selection.pptx5 - Testing and Selection.pptx
5 - Testing and Selection.pptx
 
Public Safety Hiring Tutorial
Public Safety Hiring TutorialPublic Safety Hiring Tutorial
Public Safety Hiring Tutorial
 
673Foundations of Psychological TestingNoel Hendrick.docx
673Foundations of Psychological TestingNoel Hendrick.docx673Foundations of Psychological TestingNoel Hendrick.docx
673Foundations of Psychological TestingNoel Hendrick.docx
 
Reliability and validity
Reliability and validityReliability and validity
Reliability and validity
 
Reliability and validity w3
Reliability and validity w3Reliability and validity w3
Reliability and validity w3
 
HR Management
HR Management   HR Management
HR Management
 
evaluating hrd programs
 evaluating hrd programs evaluating hrd programs
evaluating hrd programs
 
Hrm
HrmHrm
Hrm
 

What the Department of Labor Says About the Assessments You Use

  • 1. 1 What the Department of Labor Has to Say About the Assessments You Use Steve Kohr, Managing Director Steve@TheEmployersEdge.com
  • 2. 2 US Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration 2000 Publication
  • 3. 3 DOL Summary 81 pages 13 Assessment Principles Chapter 9 = Main Points – Guide Review Free Download (Adobe) http://www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/empTestAsse.pdf
  • 4. 4 DOL: PURPOSE OF BOOK To Maximize RIGHT FIT between Jobs & Employees To Improve Assessment Efficiency and Effectiveness To Interpret Results Accurately To Understand Professional and Legal Standards
  • 5. 5 DOL Special Notice “Material in this publication is in the public domain and may be reproduced, fully or partially, without permission from the federal government. Source credit is requested but not required. Permission is required only to reproduce any copyrighted material contained herein.”
  • 6. 6 DOL: Assessments Defined “Any test or procedure used to measure and individual’s employment or career as related to qualifications & interests can be considered a personnel assessment tool.”
  • 7. 7 Assessments Mental/physical ability* Achievement tests Biodata inventories Employment interviews* Personality inventories* Honesty & integrity* measures Education Experience Recommendations & reference checks* Assessment centers Medical examinations Drug and alcohol tests *The Employer’s Edge has tools designed for these purposes
  • 8. 8 DOL on Benefits of Using Assessments Reduce High Employee Turnover Improve Hiring Decisions Eliminate Employee Errors Reduce Absenteeism Improve Productivity Meet Legal and Professional Standards
  • 9. 9 Department of Labor’s AnEmployer’s Guide to 13 Principles Use only in a purposeful manner Use a ‘Whole person’ approach Unbiased & fair to all groups Reliable instruments & procedures Demonstrated valid for the specific purpose for which they are being used Appropriate for the target population
  • 10. 10 Understandable & comprehensive documentation Staff are properly trained Testing conditions are suitable for all test takers Reasonable accommodation for disabilities Instrument security Confidentiality of assessment results Scores are interpreted properly Department of Labor’s AnEmployer’s Guide to Good Practices
  • 11. 11 1. Use assessment tools in a purposeful manner Know what you want to accomplish & why Select a tool(s) that will get you the information you are wanting
  • 12. 12 Inappropriate Use “Assessment instruments can be counter productive when used inappropriately. Inappropriate use stems from not having a clear understanding of what you want to measure and why you want to measure it. Having a clear understanding of the purpose of your assessment system is important is selecting the appropriate assessment tools to meet that purpose.
  • 13. 13 2. Use the whole person approach All assessment tools are subject to errors. Do NOT expect any test or procedure to measure a personal trait or ability with perfect accuracy for every single person. Do NOT expect any test or procedure to be completely accurate in predicting performance.
  • 14. 14 ‘whole person’ approach “Using a single test or procedure will provide you with a limited view of a person’s employment qualifications. Using a variety of assessment tools (whole-person approach)will help educe the number of selection errors made and will boost the effectiveness of your decision making.” Source: Testing and Assessment: An Employer’s Guide to Good Practices U.S. Dept of Labor 1999
  • 15. 15 What to look for in a test? Relevant Information Convenience based on your needs Administration (paper/pencil • on-screen) Analysis (fax back • software • internet) User Friendly Report Feedback Cost effective Potential for adverse impact?
  • 16. 16 4. Use only reliable assessment instruments & procedures Reliability The ability of an instrument to measure consistently & with relative absence of error. The higher the reliability confident, the more confidence you can have in the score. A reliable instrument is NOT always valid.
  • 17. 17 Reliability .90 and up……Excellent! .80-.89……… Good .70-.79……… Adequate Below .70……May have limited applicability Source: Testing and Assessment:An Employer’s Guide to Good Practices U.S. Dept of Labor 1999
  • 18. 18 5. Use only instruments valid for the specific purpose Validity Ability of an instrument to measure what it is intendedto measure. What does the instrument measure? How well does it measure it? A valid instrument is ALWAYS reliable.
  • 19. 19 Validity Defined “There’s a simple way to think about validity. In selecting or promoting employees, we want to answer one simple question: Do people who do better on this test perform better on the job?” Hiring Great People McGraw-Hill, 1999 p.137
  • 20. 20 What to look for in a test? High Validity .35 & Above…..very beneficial .21-.34…………likely to be useful .11-.20…………depends on circumstances Below .11………unlikely to be useful Source: Testing and Assessment:An Employer’s Guide to Good Practices U.S. Dept. of Labor 1999
  • 21. 21 Selection Methods Validity Cognitive Ability .54 Job Tryout .44 Personality .38 Reference Check .26 Experience .18 Interview .14 source: Hunter & Hunter
  • 22. 22 6. Use assessment tools that are appropriate for the target population. No two assessments are alike!!!
  • 23. 23 Pros ConsHonest/Integrity No adverse impact Demonstrated validity Easy to administer Inexpensive to administer Privacy ? Faking possible Interpretation Not for current employees State regulations
  • 24. 24 Pros ConsAbility Tests Most useful performance predictors Easy to administer Inexpensive to administer Can result in high adverse impact Physical ability test costly to develop & administer
  • 25. 25 Pros ConsAchievement Tests Job Knowledge/Work Sample = high validity Easy to administer Inexpensive to administer Less adverse impact Written tests result in adverse impact Work sample tests – expensive to develop
  • 26. 26 Pros ConsBio – Data Inventories Easy to administer Inexpensive to administer Validity evidence Can reduce adverse impact w/ other assessments Privacy concerns Faking
  • 27.
  • 28. May reduce adverse impact if used with other tests
  • 30. Skill of interviewer is critical to the quality of the interviewSource: Testing and Assessment: An Employer’s Guide to Good Practices U.S. Dept of Labor 1999
  • 31.
  • 33. May help reduce adverse impact with other tests
  • 34. distinguish b/ clinical & employment oriented
  • 36. invasion of privacy concernSource: Testing and Assessment: An Employer’s Guide to Good Practices U.S. Dept of Labor 1999
  • 37.
  • 38. guard against gross mismatch or incompetence
  • 39. In some cases, it is difficult to demonstrate job relatedness and business necessity of education and experience requirementsSource: Testing and Assessment:An Employer’s Guide to Good Practices U.S. Dept of Labor 1999
  • 40.
  • 41. Can serve as protection against potential negligent hiring lawsuits
  • 42. May encourage more accurate information
  • 43. Reports almost always positive; they do not help differentiate between good workers and poor workersSource: Testing and Assessment: An Employer’s Guide to Good Practices U.S. Dept of Labor 1999
  • 44. 31 Pros ConsAssessment Centers Job/Training performance predictor Mgr. Potential predictor Leadership ability Whole Person approach Expensive to develop Expensive to administer Specialized assessor training
  • 45. 32 Pros ConsMedical Exams Insures safe environment when use consistent with Federal, State, Local laws Cannot be administered prior to job offer Risk of violating regulations
  • 46. 33 Pros ConsDrug/Alcohol tests Ensures safe work environment when consistent with Federal, State, Local laws Considered medical exams Risk of violating applicable regulations
  • 47. 34 7. Use assessment instruments with understandable & comprehensive documentation available
  • 48. 35 What to look for in a test? Technical Validation Documentation “Test manuals should provide a description of the validation procedures used, and evidence of validity, reliability and test fairness.” Source: Testing and Assessment:An Employer’s Guide to Good Practices U.S. Dept. of Labor 1999
  • 49. 36 8. Ensure that administration staff are properly trained Make sure guidelines are followed Answers are not given out Test anxiety is minimized Obtain informed consent & a waiver
  • 50. 37 9. Ensure testing conditions are suitable for all test takers When implementing… Consistency Consistency Consistency
  • 51. 38 10. Provide reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities Examples of accommodations: Not timed Questions read to person In another language
  • 52. 39 11. Maintain instrument security Make sure access to assessments is safe. If assessments are on the internet, make sure a password is used.
  • 53. 40 12. Maintain confidentiality of assessment results Only those with a legitimate need to know should have access to results Explain your procedures to the test taker
  • 54. 41 13. Ensure that scores are interpreted properly Inferences need to be reasonable, well-founded, and not based on stereotypes Needs to be solid evidence. Should be good support from technical manuals.
  • 55.
  • 56. Is the test reliable?
  • 57. Is the test valid?
  • 58. Is the test is easy to administer?
  • 59. Is the test easy to score.
  • 60.