17. 突顯性與喜好度判斷 155
Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect:
Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987.
Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289.
Bornstein, R. F., & D’Agostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus
recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 545-552.
Bornstein, R. F., & D’Agostino, P. R. (1994). The
attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency:
Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional
model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition,
12, 103-128.
Brandt, K. R., Gardiner, J. M., & Macrae, C. N. (2006).
The distinctiveness effect in forenames: The role of
subjective experiences and recognition memory. British
Journal of Psychology, 97, 269-280.
Brandt, K. R., Macrae, C. N., Schloerscheidt, A. M.,
& Milne, A. B. (2003). Remembering or knowing
others? Person recognition and recollective experience.
Memory, 11, 89-100.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the
behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). London: Routledge
Academic.
Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (2010). A critical evaluation
of the disengagement hypothesis. Acta Psychologica,
135, 103-105.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992).
Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional
control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective
experience. Memory and Cognition, 16, 309-313.
Gardiner, J. M., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2000).
Remembering and knowing. In E. Tulving & F. I. M.
Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp.
229-244). New York: Oxford University Press.
Glanzer, M., & Cunitz, A. R. (1966). Two storage
mechanisms in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning
and Verbal Behavior, 5, 351-360.
Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection
theory and psychophysics. Oxford, UK: Wiley.
Hunt, R. R. (1995). The subtlety of distinctiveness: What
von Restorff really did. Psychonomic Bulletin and
Review, 2, 105-112.
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework:
Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory.
Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
Jang, Y., Wixted, J., & Huber, D. E. (2009). Testing
signal-detection models of yes/no and two-alternative
forced-choice recognition memory. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 291-306.
Kishiyama, M. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2003). Novelty
effects on recollection and familiarity in recognition
memory. Memory and Cognition, 31, 1045-1051.
Kishiyama, M. M., Yonelinas, A. P., & Knight, R.
T. (2009). Novelty enhancements in memory are
dependent on lateral prefrontal cortex. Journal of
Neuroscience, 29, 8114-8118.
Kishiyama, M. M., Yonelinas, A. P., & Lazzara, M.
M. (2004). The von Restorff effect in amnesia: The
contribution of the hippocampal system to novelty-
related memory enhancements. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 16, 15-23.
Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective
discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized.
Science, 207, 557-558.
Lee, A. Y. (1994). The mere exposure effect: Is it a
mere case of misattribution? Advances in Consumer
Research, 21, 270-275.
Lee, A. Y. (2001). The mere exposure effect: An
uncertainty reduction explanation revisited. Personality
and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1255-1266.
Liao, H. I., & Yeh, S. L. (2011). Interaction between
stimulus-driven orienting and top-down modulation in
attentional capture. Acta Psychologica, 138, 52-59.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of
previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
Mickes, L., Wais, P. E., & Wixted, J. T. (2009).
Recollection is a continuous process: Implications for
dual-process of recognition memory. Psychological
Science, 20, 509-515.
08-楊政達.indd 155 2013/3/21 上午 11:52:48
18. 156 楊政達 許景淳 黃揚名 蔡宜成
Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1962). The serial position effect of
free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64,
482-488.
Neo, G., & Chua, F. K. (2006). Capturing focused
attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 68, 1286-
1296.
Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2007). Recognising what
you like: Examining the relation between the mere-
exposure effect and recognition. European Journal of
Cognitive Psychology, 19, 103-118.
Oeusoonthornwattana, O., & Shanks, D. R. (2010). I
like what I know: Is recognition a non-compensatory
determiner of consumer choice? Judgment and
Decision Making, 5, 310-325.
Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two
means of access to the personal past. Memory and
Cognition, 21, 89-102.
Rajaram, S. (1996). Perceptual effects on remembering:
Recollective processes in picture recognition memory.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition, 22, 365-377.
Rajaram, S. (1998). The effects of conceptual salience and
perceptual distinctiveness on conscious recollection.
Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 71-78.
Rajaram, S., & Geraci, L. (2000). Conceptual
fluency selectively influences knowing. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 26, 1070-1074.
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004).
Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in
the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and
Social Psychology Review, 8, 364-382.
Schmidt, S. R. (1991). Can we have a distinctive theory
of memory ? Memory & Cognition, 19, 523-542.
Seamon, J. G., Brody, N., & Kauff, D. M. (1983).
Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not
recognized: Effects of shadowing, masking, and
cerebral laterality. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 544-555.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002).
E-prime: User’s guide. Sharpsburg, PA: Psychology
Software.
Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and
form. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
Theeuwes, J. (2004). Top-down search strategies cannot
override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and
Review, 11, 65-70.
Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of
visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135, 77-99.
Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration
theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian
Psychology-Psychologie Canadienne, 26, 1-12.
von Restorff, H. (1933). Über die Wirkung von
Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld. Psychological
Research, 18, 299-342.
Wais, P. E., Mickes, L., & Wixted, J. T. (2008).
Remember/know judgments probe degrees of
recollection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20,
400-405.
Wang, M. Y., & Chang, H. C. (2004). The mere exposure
effect and recognition memory. Cognition and Emotion,
18, 1055-1078.
Wehr, T., & Wippich, W. (2004). Typography and
color: Effects of salience and fluency on conscious
recollective experience. Psychological Research, 69,
138-146.
Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T. A., & Reber,
R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency:
Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch &
K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation:
Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189-
217). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wixted, J. T. (2007). Spotlighting the probative findings:
Reply to Parks and Yonelinas (2007). Psychological
Review, 114, 203-209.
Wixted, J. T., & Stretch, V. (2004). In defense of the
signal detection interpretation of remember/know
judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 616-
641.
Yeh, S. L., & Liao, H. I. (2008). On the generality of the
contingent orienting hypothesis. Acta Psychologica,
129, 157-165.
08-楊政達.indd 156 2013/3/21 上午 11:52:49
19. 突顯性與喜好度判斷 157
Yeh, S. L., & Liao, H. I. (2010). On the generality of the
displaywide contingent orienting hypothesis: Can a
visual onset capture attention without top-down control
settings for displaywide onset? Acta Psychologica, 135,
159-167.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics
in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process
model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and
familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal
of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.
Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1995). The relation
between remembering and knowing as bases for
recognition: Effects of size congruency. Journal of
Memory and Language, 34, 622-643.
Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Response bias
and the process-dissociation procedure. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 422-434.
Yonelinas, A. P., & Parks, C. M. (2007). Receiver
operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition
memory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 800-832.
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). The attitudinal effects of
mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 9, 1-27.
Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to
the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological
Science, 10, 224-228.
08-楊政達.indd 157 2013/3/21 上午 11:52:49
20. 158 楊政達 許景淳 黃揚名 蔡宜成
Examining the Effect of Perceptual Saliency on the Liking
Judgment
Cheng-Ta Yang,1
Ching-Chun Hsu,1
Yang-Ming Huang,2
and Yi-Cheng Tsai1
1
Department of Psychology, National Cheng Kung University
2
Department of Psychology, Fu Jen Catholic University
Humans tend to be attracted by stimuli with more salient features, and hence tend to value them more highly.
No prior research, however, has investigated the effects of perceptual salience on value judgments. In this study, we
manipulated the perceptual salience of the study stimuli in order to verify the aforementioned tendency. Participants
were asked to memorize a list of objects, a few of which were printed in distinctive colors. Afterwards, they were asked to
recognize the test stimuli and make the preference judgment. The results showed that when there was sufficient time to
encode the study stimuli and to retrieve details regarding the stimuli (Experiment 1 and 3A), the more salient test stimuli
were valued more highly. In addition, the participants’ memory performance and probability of recollection were higher.
On the other hand, with insufficient time for encoding (Experiment 2) or retrieval (Experiment 3B), the participants did
not show any preferences for the salient stimuli, and the distinctiveness effect on memory was not present. In addition,
the participants indicated preference for a stimulus when they responded “remember” as opposed to responding “know.”
They also preferred a stimulus when it had been subjectively perceived at the study phase. Taken together, these results
are consistent with the uncertainty reduction hypothesis. Perceptual salience can enhance memory performance, reduce
uncertainty in memory recognition, and therefore affect value judgments.
Keywords: distinctiveness effect, mere exposure effect, recognition memory
08-楊政達.indd 158 2013/3/21 上午 11:52:49