SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 1
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Urban rebranding case studies:
Nottingham’s image Nottingham’s                     Nottingham’s Hub              Castle Wharf,             Lace Market               Scarborough                  Sport Manchester/
                     Squares, Old Market            and surroundings              Nottingham                                                                       Cape Town
                     /Trinity/Lace Market
How places re-       Success of                     Why rebranding is             Role of players,          Role of players,          How places reinvent Success of sport and
invent               rebranding in urban            needed, profile of            changing built            Changing built            themselves/re-       leisure
themselves/re-       areas. Role of players         places in need of,            environment               environment               imaging. Role of
imaging. Why         Flagship in city               Role of players.              (commercial/              (commercial), Using       players. Rebranding
                                                                                                            sport as a catalyst,
rebranding is        centre                         Change in built               residential). Success                               towns for tourism,
                                                                                                            Success of flagship,
needed. Role of                                     environment                   of flagship/                                        Rebranding declining
                                                                                                            Tourism in history
players. Promoting                                  (commercial,                  waterfront                centres, Sport &          coastal resort
city identity                                       residential)                                            Leisure
History of bad         OMS – Needed ASB, poor       Need for – Station run        Old canal area was        Nottingham                Yorkshire Forward,           In the back of urban
image:- binge          access (steps), no large     down, not good gateway        derelict. City Council    Contemporary Art          Regional Development         rebranding booklet
                       space for events.            to city. Meadows high         did environmental         Gallery (good for         and Scarborough
drinking, Stags and    City Council did             levels of deprivation                                                             Borough Council had
                                                                                                                                                                   do the activities will
hens, “shottingham”                                                               improvements              Arts/Tourism), opened                                  not do any harm!
                       international design         (profiling), cheap vacant                                                         planning weekend. After
                                                                                  (landscaping, paving,     2009, cost £20m, Arts
Attempts to give       competition. Gustafson       offices to let, low order                                                         published “Urban
                       Porter won with English      business. Good
                                                                                  planting)                 Council & Nottingham      Renaissance
positive image:
                       Heritage agreement. Cost     pedestrian count on           In 1990s Magistrates      City Council, very good   Programme” aims:
Science City (given                                                               Court, County Archives    attendance (100,000
                       £8m (EU and City)            main roads and tram                                                               Invest in infra-structure,
status by Gov’t)       Success – events, more       stop but elsewhere low.       and Inland Revenue        visitors in first few     Reverse decline in built
based on Biocity,      people, less ASB, good Bi-   Lots of derelict run down     (flagship) moved          months). Boosted local    environment, Attract
University Research,   polars, landuse, etc.        property (land use            there.                    business – Jamies         people with real money
Science Park, etc      Trinity – replaced ugly      survey, streetview)           After Capital 1 (US       (Oliver) Restaurant       to spend.
(good but not well     multi storey and             Strategy – “the hub”,         bank), bars, offices      opened down the road      Harbour (2004) £2.8
                       buildings. Not success,      integrate transport,          (BT, Evening Post).       National Ice Centre/      million in harbour
known)                 people don’t stay,           refurbish station and                                                             (seating, larger boats,
Big/Slanty N,                                                                     Won award from            Arena (Sport and
                       buildings vacant, lacks      extend, new car park,                                                             tourist info).
introduced 2005        greenery, design             better retail. £60 million,
                                                                                  Department for            Leisure) opened 2000,     Not very successful
                       criticised, redesign         paid for by workplace         Environment.              £43m Lottery, City        environment not bad but
cost £125000. Now
                       pending                      parking levy plus others      Quiet, calm, sitting      Council (used for         cheap shops/cafes/
people (Council,
                       Lace Market – behind         (Network rail, East           area, accessible (rail,   events, concerts, ice     amusements dominate
Nottingham Post,       new buildings near tram      Midlands Trains,              tram, bus, motorway),     hockey finals,            (not going to attract rich
MPs, people) think     stop, next to college. Not   Nottingham Express            good environment.         conference facilities,    tourists)
not successful         well used. Buildings         Transit)                      Later apartment and       Bolero Square), new       Clean beach (not blue
(except Experience     vacant, restaurant has       Aim to improve gateway,       office developments       apartments around         flag – top award) Quality
Nottm)                 closed and re-opened         regenerate surrounding        (some not finished)       but regeneration very     Coast Award
                       several times.               area, attract investment,                                                         (restrictions on water
Want to return to                                                                                           local (not spread
                                                    create jobs (knock on                                                             quality, dogs, parking,
Robin Hood!                                         effect in Meadows)
                                                                                                            around)                   facilities and safety)

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Urban rebranding strategies to reinvent city images

Public Strategies – help or hindrance?
Public Strategies – help or hindrance?Public Strategies – help or hindrance?
Public Strategies – help or hindrance?Creative Metropoles
 
Steve Warren, ISAN and Beam Seminar, Wakefield
Steve Warren, ISAN and Beam Seminar, Wakefield Steve Warren, ISAN and Beam Seminar, Wakefield
Steve Warren, ISAN and Beam Seminar, Wakefield Kate Watson
 
Innovation Backbone and its Unfoldings
Innovation Backbone and its UnfoldingsInnovation Backbone and its Unfoldings
Innovation Backbone and its UnfoldingsRafael Saraiva
 
Project Great Island IłAwa Poland
Project Great Island   IłAwa   PolandProject Great Island   IłAwa   Poland
Project Great Island IłAwa PolandBalticaPM
 
101006 Architectural Design Project POLIMI
101006 Architectural Design Project POLIMI101006 Architectural Design Project POLIMI
101006 Architectural Design Project POLIMIAmr Alaaeldin Elesawy
 
DRAFT Downtown Saint Paul Station Area Plan
DRAFT Downtown Saint Paul Station Area PlanDRAFT Downtown Saint Paul Station Area Plan
DRAFT Downtown Saint Paul Station Area PlanSt. Paul Smart Trips
 

Ähnlich wie Urban rebranding strategies to reinvent city images (8)

Public Strategies – help or hindrance?
Public Strategies – help or hindrance?Public Strategies – help or hindrance?
Public Strategies – help or hindrance?
 
Steve Warren, ISAN and Beam Seminar, Wakefield
Steve Warren, ISAN and Beam Seminar, Wakefield Steve Warren, ISAN and Beam Seminar, Wakefield
Steve Warren, ISAN and Beam Seminar, Wakefield
 
Innovation Backbone and its Unfoldings
Innovation Backbone and its UnfoldingsInnovation Backbone and its Unfoldings
Innovation Backbone and its Unfoldings
 
Project Great Island IłAwa Poland
Project Great Island   IłAwa   PolandProject Great Island   IłAwa   Poland
Project Great Island IłAwa Poland
 
Expo booklet
Expo bookletExpo booklet
Expo booklet
 
101006 Architectural Design Project POLIMI
101006 Architectural Design Project POLIMI101006 Architectural Design Project POLIMI
101006 Architectural Design Project POLIMI
 
Auckland placemaking workshop 2011
Auckland placemaking workshop 2011Auckland placemaking workshop 2011
Auckland placemaking workshop 2011
 
DRAFT Downtown Saint Paul Station Area Plan
DRAFT Downtown Saint Paul Station Area PlanDRAFT Downtown Saint Paul Station Area Plan
DRAFT Downtown Saint Paul Station Area Plan
 

Mehr von Sally Longford

Lace market data analysis
Lace market data analysisLace market data analysis
Lace market data analysisSally Longford
 
Unit 1 jan 2011 resource booklet
Unit 1 jan 2011 resource bookletUnit 1 jan 2011 resource booklet
Unit 1 jan 2011 resource bookletSally Longford
 
Progress test 4 weeks in feedback
Progress test 4 weeks in feedbackProgress test 4 weeks in feedback
Progress test 4 weeks in feedbackSally Longford
 
AS geography progress test October 2013
AS geography progress test October 2013AS geography progress test October 2013
AS geography progress test October 2013Sally Longford
 
Contested planet resource booklet june 2010
Contested planet resource booklet june 2010Contested planet resource booklet june 2010
Contested planet resource booklet june 2010Sally Longford
 
Contested planet june 2010
Contested planet june 2010Contested planet june 2010
Contested planet june 2010Sally Longford
 
Assessing the 4 options against the criteria in figure 10
Assessing the 4 options against the criteria in figure 10Assessing the 4 options against the criteria in figure 10
Assessing the 4 options against the criteria in figure 10Sally Longford
 
January 2013 being synoptic
January 2013 being synopticJanuary 2013 being synoptic
January 2013 being synopticSally Longford
 
Mark scheme Unit 3 June 2012
Mark scheme Unit 3 June 2012Mark scheme Unit 3 June 2012
Mark scheme Unit 3 June 2012Sally Longford
 
Global Challenges Mark Scheme January 2012
Global Challenges Mark Scheme January 2012Global Challenges Mark Scheme January 2012
Global Challenges Mark Scheme January 2012Sally Longford
 
Global Challenges mark scheme June 2010
Global Challenges mark scheme June 2010Global Challenges mark scheme June 2010
Global Challenges mark scheme June 2010Sally Longford
 
Web quest – going global
Web quest – going globalWeb quest – going global
Web quest – going globalSally Longford
 
Geo invest may 2011 mark scheme
Geo invest may 2011 mark schemeGeo invest may 2011 mark scheme
Geo invest may 2011 mark schemeSally Longford
 
Geo invest jan 2012 mark scheme
Geo invest jan 2012 mark schemeGeo invest jan 2012 mark scheme
Geo invest jan 2012 mark schemeSally Longford
 

Mehr von Sally Longford (20)

Unit 4 Essay feedback
Unit 4 Essay feedbackUnit 4 Essay feedback
Unit 4 Essay feedback
 
Lace market data analysis
Lace market data analysisLace market data analysis
Lace market data analysis
 
Unit 1 jan 2011 resource booklet
Unit 1 jan 2011 resource bookletUnit 1 jan 2011 resource booklet
Unit 1 jan 2011 resource booklet
 
6 ge01 01_jan 2011
6 ge01 01_jan 20116 ge01 01_jan 2011
6 ge01 01_jan 2011
 
Progress test 4 weeks in feedback
Progress test 4 weeks in feedbackProgress test 4 weeks in feedback
Progress test 4 weeks in feedback
 
AS geography progress test October 2013
AS geography progress test October 2013AS geography progress test October 2013
AS geography progress test October 2013
 
Contested planet resource booklet june 2010
Contested planet resource booklet june 2010Contested planet resource booklet june 2010
Contested planet resource booklet june 2010
 
Contested planet june 2010
Contested planet june 2010Contested planet june 2010
Contested planet june 2010
 
Mock feedback
Mock feedbackMock feedback
Mock feedback
 
Assessing the 4 options against the criteria in figure 10
Assessing the 4 options against the criteria in figure 10Assessing the 4 options against the criteria in figure 10
Assessing the 4 options against the criteria in figure 10
 
January 2013 being synoptic
January 2013 being synopticJanuary 2013 being synoptic
January 2013 being synoptic
 
Lace market
Lace marketLace market
Lace market
 
Feedback from as mock
Feedback from as mockFeedback from as mock
Feedback from as mock
 
Mark scheme Unit 3 June 2012
Mark scheme Unit 3 June 2012Mark scheme Unit 3 June 2012
Mark scheme Unit 3 June 2012
 
Global Challenges Mark Scheme January 2012
Global Challenges Mark Scheme January 2012Global Challenges Mark Scheme January 2012
Global Challenges Mark Scheme January 2012
 
Global Challenges mark scheme June 2010
Global Challenges mark scheme June 2010Global Challenges mark scheme June 2010
Global Challenges mark scheme June 2010
 
Dev gap webquest
Dev gap webquestDev gap webquest
Dev gap webquest
 
Web quest – going global
Web quest – going globalWeb quest – going global
Web quest – going global
 
Geo invest may 2011 mark scheme
Geo invest may 2011 mark schemeGeo invest may 2011 mark scheme
Geo invest may 2011 mark scheme
 
Geo invest jan 2012 mark scheme
Geo invest jan 2012 mark schemeGeo invest jan 2012 mark scheme
Geo invest jan 2012 mark scheme
 

Urban rebranding strategies to reinvent city images

  • 1. Urban rebranding case studies: Nottingham’s image Nottingham’s Nottingham’s Hub Castle Wharf, Lace Market Scarborough Sport Manchester/ Squares, Old Market and surroundings Nottingham Cape Town /Trinity/Lace Market How places re- Success of Why rebranding is Role of players, Role of players, How places reinvent Success of sport and invent rebranding in urban needed, profile of changing built Changing built themselves/re- leisure themselves/re- areas. Role of players places in need of, environment environment imaging. Role of imaging. Why Flagship in city Role of players. (commercial/ (commercial), Using players. Rebranding sport as a catalyst, rebranding is centre Change in built residential). Success towns for tourism, Success of flagship, needed. Role of environment of flagship/ Rebranding declining Tourism in history players. Promoting (commercial, waterfront centres, Sport & coastal resort city identity residential) Leisure History of bad OMS – Needed ASB, poor Need for – Station run Old canal area was Nottingham Yorkshire Forward, In the back of urban image:- binge access (steps), no large down, not good gateway derelict. City Council Contemporary Art Regional Development rebranding booklet space for events. to city. Meadows high did environmental Gallery (good for and Scarborough drinking, Stags and City Council did levels of deprivation Borough Council had do the activities will hens, “shottingham” improvements Arts/Tourism), opened not do any harm! international design (profiling), cheap vacant planning weekend. After (landscaping, paving, 2009, cost £20m, Arts Attempts to give competition. Gustafson offices to let, low order published “Urban Porter won with English business. Good planting) Council & Nottingham Renaissance positive image: Heritage agreement. Cost pedestrian count on In 1990s Magistrates City Council, very good Programme” aims: Science City (given Court, County Archives attendance (100,000 £8m (EU and City) main roads and tram Invest in infra-structure, status by Gov’t) Success – events, more stop but elsewhere low. and Inland Revenue visitors in first few Reverse decline in built based on Biocity, people, less ASB, good Bi- Lots of derelict run down (flagship) moved months). Boosted local environment, Attract University Research, polars, landuse, etc. property (land use there. business – Jamies people with real money Science Park, etc Trinity – replaced ugly survey, streetview) After Capital 1 (US (Oliver) Restaurant to spend. (good but not well multi storey and Strategy – “the hub”, bank), bars, offices opened down the road Harbour (2004) £2.8 buildings. Not success, integrate transport, (BT, Evening Post). National Ice Centre/ million in harbour known) people don’t stay, refurbish station and (seating, larger boats, Big/Slanty N, Won award from Arena (Sport and buildings vacant, lacks extend, new car park, tourist info). introduced 2005 greenery, design better retail. £60 million, Department for Leisure) opened 2000, Not very successful criticised, redesign paid for by workplace Environment. £43m Lottery, City environment not bad but cost £125000. Now pending parking levy plus others Quiet, calm, sitting Council (used for cheap shops/cafes/ people (Council, Lace Market – behind (Network rail, East area, accessible (rail, events, concerts, ice amusements dominate Nottingham Post, new buildings near tram Midlands Trains, tram, bus, motorway), hockey finals, (not going to attract rich MPs, people) think stop, next to college. Not Nottingham Express good environment. conference facilities, tourists) not successful well used. Buildings Transit) Later apartment and Bolero Square), new Clean beach (not blue (except Experience vacant, restaurant has Aim to improve gateway, office developments apartments around flag – top award) Quality Nottm) closed and re-opened regenerate surrounding (some not finished) but regeneration very Coast Award several times. area, attract investment, (restrictions on water Want to return to local (not spread create jobs (knock on quality, dogs, parking, Robin Hood! effect in Meadows) around) facilities and safety)