Learn about the key steps to a world class lead generation program in this previously recorded webinar by Sales Benchmark Index. A presentation by Sales Benchmark Index.
2. Logistics for today’s call….
All attendee’s will be on “silent” mode during the
presentation.
Please utilize the “Questions” feature to ask questions;
simply type in your question and press enter.
At the conclusion of the presentation, the moderator
will facilitate the “Question & Answer” session
utilizing the “Questions” feature.
3. Sales Benchmark Index will….
Send a copy of presentation to you
Additional questions can be sent directly to:
Dan.Perry@salesbenchmarkindex.com
Join us for our next Webinar….
Sales Resource Planning - What should next year's org chart
look like?
Thursday, October 13th , 2011
1:00 p.m. Central
30 minutes
Register at www.salesbenchmarkindex.com
4. Today’s Guest…..
Dan Perry
Principal at SBI
Prior to SBI, held Executive Sales
Leadership positions at Aramark,
Corporate Express, Lavi Industries
and 3 Day Blinds
Serves as adjunct professor at
Pepperdine University for MBA
program specializing in Sales
Management
5. Lead Generation Programs:
The definition of a lead is determined by Buyer Personas.
We understand the # of leads generated, and their quality score, for
each demand generation $ spent.
We have a defined process to move from an inquiry-lead-opportunity-
customer.
We understand the volume required at each funnel stage to make the
number.
We have made the switch from outbound to inbound marketing.
Back
6. Lead Generation =
Demand Generation + Lead Management
Lead Generation
Demand
Generation
Sources
Lead Management Stages
Webinars
Awareness Consideration Engagement Intent Opportunity
Email
Campaigns
Direct
Mail
Web
MCL MQL SAL SQL
Outbound
Calling
Events
Exit Criteria
7. Persona: Company Profile and Fit AWARENESS CONSIDERATION PREFERENCE
PREFERENCE
Focus Verticals and Employee Count:
Manufacturing, Retail, Transportation, Professional Buyer Buyer Buyer
& Financial Services (300 – 5000 employees) • Do I have a problem? • Can I ignore this? • How long will it take to get this
Indicators of high likelihood of pain, strong fit • How does this problem relate to • Is there a quick fix? fixed?
achieving my goals? • Can I fix it myself? • How much of our time do I need
• Old legacy in-house ERP and T&A systems
• How painful is the problem? • Do I need help? to put towards it?
• In-house manual systems and processes • Who does the problem impact – • What are my choices if I need • How do I know the fix will work?
• Hourly workforce that is decentralized, departments, users, employees, help? • How disruptive will it be?
unionized, decision makers? • How should I evaluate • How much will it cost?
• Growing/shrinking, leadership change, • What are my peers doing? alternatives? • What impact will it have?
merger/acq • How will others on my • What happens if it doesn’t work?
• Facing heavily regulation with govt customers purchasing committee evaluate
Buying criteria: alternatives?
• Increased productivity, Compliance, User I Want…
I Cant… Key Messages
experience, business case, systems integration,
employee satisfaction
• Receive advanced notification and • Ease of use solution for employees, • Increase employee engagement
HR SVP/EVP (Most senior person)
visibility to compliance issues limited training required resulting in higher satisfaction
Responsibilities: Benefits, • Get visibility or access to historical • An early warning alert and • Ensure compliance with
Payroll, recruiting, data to manage compliance issues historical view of compliance automated HR and pay policy
compensation, performance • Identify root cause of performance challenges and issues enforcement that supports
management and productivity issues. • ALL: Access to data that helps me workers and workplace
Focus: HR compliance, employee
• Maximize the productivity of my maximize return on employee • High user adoption, reduced
engagement/culture, productivity, accountability
workforce investment (Productive/Efficient) training and fewer errors with BIC
Role in purchase: Always a key influencer and • ALL: Balance staffing • ALL: third party validation and user experience
may be drive the evaluation. Evaluates employee requirements and employee proof of financial justification
engagement, staffing levels, and compliance. schedule preference
Operations COO • Get the reports I need to compare • Ease of use solution for employees, • Integrated solution resulting in
profitability of plants/stores. limited training required improved accuracy (no re-key)
Responsibilities: Delivers on
• Identify root cause of performance • To reduce costs of managing my and speed (no latency)
the promise of the organization
and productivity issues. workforce • Decreases administrative time
(product/service)
• Maximize workforce productivity • Deliver highest quality at the Improve customer service and
Focus: Optimal productivity and efficiency. • Receive advanced notification and lowest cost in shortest time product quality while reducing
Seeking Quality, Cost savings and Speed. Process visibility to labor expense leakage • An early warning alert and costs by changing the way labor is
driven to achieve customer satisfaction. • Model workforce changes and see historical view of compliance deployed and scheduled
how they impact KPI’s challenges and issues • Cloud solution is scalable and
Role in purchase: User Buyer, must work with the • Schedule the right people, right configurable, with an upgrade
CFO to fund a WFM solution. place, right time path that is automated and no cost
Finance CFO (delegates to Controller) • Get the reports I need to compare • To reduce costs of managing my • Self-funding investment, clear ROI
Responsibilities: Delivers bottom profitability of plants/stores. workforce • Flexibility of solution to meet the
line numbers for the organization. • Receive advanced notification and • To drive out costs and enable current and future needs of my
Financial performance reporting, visibility to labor expense leakage incremental revenue generation evolving company
forecasting revenue, budgeting and compliance issues • Better align corporate
and cost control performance indicators with
Focus: Financial performance and productivity. employee activities
Always looking for ways to increase profitability. • Cloud solution is scalable and
configurable, with an upgrade
Role in purchase: Approver/Economic Buyer path that is automated and no cost
8. Private Equity Firm – Top Metrics
Marketing Sourced Pipeline:
Percentage of Total Pipe that Marketing has created
Marketing Influenced Pipeline:
Percentage of Total Pipe that Marketing has touched during a set
time period
Investment to Pipeline Ratio:
Dollars of Sales Pipeline sourced for every program dollar invested
in Demand Creation
Investment to Revenue Ratio:
Dollars of Revenue sourced for every program dollar invested in
Demand Generation
Investment to Influence Ratio:
Dollars of Sales Pipeline touched for every $1 invested in all
marketing activities designed to influence opportunities
9. Lead Generation Waterfall Model
Demand
Demand Generation – Lead Sourcing Generation
(Inquiries)
Marketing Captured Lead (MCL)
Marketing Inquiry sent to CRM
Marketing Qualified Lead (MQL) Lead
Management
Qualified by LDRs as match to ICP
Sales Accepted Lead (SAL)
Qualified by LDRs with BANT
Sales Qualified Lead (SQL)
Opportunity Created Opportunity
Sales
Management
Won
“Closed/Won”
10. Waterfall Exercise – Before
Annual Jan ‘10 – Jan ‘11
1,706,435 Engagements
.0665%
13.5%
11,344 MCLs Assumptions
• All marketing “leads” were
Unknown MQLs identified at MCLs
Conversion
• All opportunities were
identified as SQLs
Rates
Unknown SALs
IMPLICATION – Many opportunities are
1,534 SQLs never developed with only low hanging
28%
fruit freeing itself through the funnel
434 Deals
10
11. Waterfall Exercise – Future State
Lead Sourcing
6,400,000
2%
128,051 MCLs Assumptions
3% • Marketing contribution of
Conversion Rates
25% of total $40m rev goal
3,842 MQLs
– 118 deals x $85k = $10m
25%
• Avg. sale $85k
960 SALs • Conversion rates of average
b2b lead gen teams with
49%
sound process
471 SQLs
IMPLICATION – Opportunities are
25% nurtured across a broader qty of MCLs
118 Deals with more qualified leads coming
through to the sales reps.
13. Lead Generation =
Demand Generation + Lead Management
Lead Generation
Demand
Generation
Sources
Lead Management Stages
Webinars
Awareness Consideration Engagement Intent Opportunity
Email
Campaigns
Direct
Mail
Web
MCL MQL SAL SQL
Outbound
Calling
Events
Exit Criteria
14.
15. Further interest….
Sign-up for a free lead generation consultation by:
Going to http://www.salesbenchmarkindex.com/Lead-Generation-Webinar-Follow-Up
Or e-mailing info@salesbenchmarkindex.com
Sales Benchmark Index will….
Send a copy of presentation to you
Additional questions can be sent directly to:
Dan.Perry@salesbenchmarkindex.com
Join us for our next Webinar….
Sales Resource Planning - What should next year's org chart look like?
Thursday, October 13th , 2011
1:00 p.m. Central
30 minutes
Register at www.salesbenchmarkindex.com
Thank-You for attending…
Hinweis der Redaktion
The slide helped Ceridian explain to Sales and Product Marketing how they were going to improve lead creation activity. First, they separated Lead Generation into its two key components -- Demand Generation and Lead Management. Each was optimized, managed and goaled differently, and measured separately. The result was the acceleration of Inquiry production, higher conversion rates, more effective lead source spending, and more Sales Qualified Leads to the sales force.
This is an example of a Persona created for Ceridian to describe the Buying Journey of an Ideal Customer as they progress from Awareness to Consideration to PreferenceMarketing uses this document to create content matched to the appropriate stage in the Buyer’s JourneyLead Development Reps use this Persona document to nurture prospects and encourage them to move at their own pace from initial Awareness to the point where they are willing, even motivated, to speak with a Sales RepSales Reps use this Persona document to understand who their future customer is and what they care about
Ceridian was owned by a private equity firm that established a series of performance measures for demand generation. Each metric captured a dimension of lead effectiveness (conversion rate to opportunities), lead efficiency (time/money/effort to manage leads in the pipeline), or lead production (volume of inquiries)
In order to present the Lead Generation team with a visual metaphor on the steps to managing leads, they used this waterfall diagram. The top bucket describes the demand generation activity necessary to stimulate interest in the target population of prospects. This is where the marketing campaigns are conducted and the various forms of lead techniques (e.g. Google Adwords, e-mail, telemarketing, print media, etc..) are leveragedThe middle set of buckets describe the lead grading, scoring, nurturing, and management activity performed by a dedicated set of Lead Development Reps, who were located in one facility.The final two buckets at the bottom capture the activities of the field sales reps who were advancing sales Opportunities using the defined sales process. The end result of their activities was a new customer, a loss to the competition, or a return of a prospect to the lead nurturing since they were not ready to buy
Ceridian had several problems with their Lead Generation function. Their marketing campaigns were not oriented to the Persona and did not measure lead source effectivenessThey measured what they called ‘Engagements’ which was similar to internet impressions, neither of which was an accurate reflection of Inquiries, which correspond more to potential Prospect interestThey used a telemarketing firm to conduct outbound direct dials that were then pushed straight to the sales force that complained, rightly, that vast majority of call leads were terribleThey had no defined Lead Management process so they were unable to know how to get from 1,534 SQLs to Inquiries
Ceridian used this waterfall approach to determine how many Inquiries they needed to generate from the Demand Generation function to satisfy their need for new logo accounts. They accomplished this by first determining that they needed 118 net new customers in the coming fiscal year. From this the assumed their Opportunity Conversion rate would remain at 25% and so they would need 471 Sales Qualified Leads or SQLs. Then, going further up to the top of the funnel, they calculated the Conversion rate at each stage of the Lead Management process, finally arriving at the conclusion that the Marketing organization needed to generate 6.4 million Inquiries. This was over 10x what they had done up until that point. From this analysis the client set about improving their Marketing demand Generation capability
Ceridian had several problems with their Lead Generation function. Their marketing campaigns were not oriented to the Persona and did not measure lead source effectivenessThey measured what they called ‘Engagements’ which was similar to internet impressions, neither of which was an accurate reflection of Inquiries, which correspond more to potential Prospect interestThey used a telemarketing firm to conduct outbound direct dials that were then pushed straight to the sales force that complained, rightly, that vast majority of call leads were terribleThey had no defined Lead Management process so they were unable to know how to get from 1,534 SQLs to Inquiries
The slide helped Ceridian explain to Sales and Product Marketing how they were going to improve lead creation activity. First, they separated Lead Generation into its two key components -- Demand Generation and Lead Management. Each was optimized, managed and goaled differently, and measured separately. The result was the acceleration of Inquiry production, higher conversion rates, more effective lead source spending, and more Sales Qualified Leads to the sales force.