SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 78
4 R’S OF RADIOBIOLOGY
Dr Nanditha Kishore
Biological basis
Cellular targets for radiation
Biological factors influencing radio sensitivity
Chemical modifiers of radiation response
DNA damage by ionizing
radiation
 Biological effects of ionizing radiation are

largely the result of DNA damage.
 A.DIRECT DAMAGE :in case of high LET

radiations such as ALPHA particles,nuetrons
 B.INDIRECT DAMAGE:IN case of low LET

radiations such as x-rays.
BIOLOGICAL BASIS
 A consideration of biological effects of

radiation should begin with three aspects
 1.Types of DNA breaks
 2.Radiosensitivity in cell cycle
 3.Advantages of dose fractionation
TYPES OF DNA DAMAGE

 DNA is a large molecule with a well known

double helical structure.
 The “backbone” of each strand consists of

alternating sugar and phosphate groups.
 Attached to this backbone are four bases, the

sequence of which specifies the genetic code.
 Pyrimidines= thymine and cytosine.
Purines= adenine and guanine
 Do DOSE=A dose of radiation that induces an






average of one lethal event per cell leaves
37% still viable .
For mammalian cells X-RAY Do dose lies
between 1-2 Gy.
Number of DNA lesions per cell
Base damage=>1000
SSB=1000
DSB=40
DNA BREAKS
2.Radiosensitivity in cell
cycle
Biological basis of survival
curve
Advantages of Fractionation
The Advantages Of Dose Fractionation Include
 Reduction in the number of hypoxic cells
through cell killing and reoxygenation.
 Reduction in the absolute number of

clonogenic tumor cells by the preceding
fractions with the killing of the better
oxygenated cells.
 Blood vessels compressed by a growing

cancer are decompressed secondary to tumor
regression.
 Fractionation exploits the difference in recovery
rate between normal, acute, and late-reacting
tissues and tumors.
 Radiation-induced redistribution of cells within
the cell cycle tends to sensitize rapidly
proliferating cells as they move into the more
sensitive phases of the cell cycle.
 The acute normal tissue toxicity of single
radiation doses can be decreased with
fractionation.
 Thus, patients' tolerance of radiotherapy will
improve with fractionated irradiation.
Biological factors influencing
radio sensitivity
 Efficacy of fractionation can be related to the “Four

Rs” of Radiobiology:

 REPAIR OF SUBLETHAL DAMAGE

 REASSORTMENT OF CELLS WITHIN THE CELL

CYCLE

 REPOPULATION
 REOXYGENATION
OPERATIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS
OF RADIATION DAMAGE

 (1) LETHAL DAMAGE= which is irreversible and

irreparable and leads irrevocably to cell death;
 (2) POTENTIALLY LETHAL DAMAGE (PLD)= The

component of radiation damage that can be
modified by postirradiation environmental
conditions.
 (3) SUBLETHAL DAMAGE (SLD)=which under
normal circumstances can be repaired in hours
unless additional sublethal damage is added
TYPES OF DNA REPAIR
 Mammalian cells have developed specialized

pathways to sense, respond to, and repair
these different types of damage.
 Different repair pathways are used to repair

DNA damage, depending on the stage of the
cell cycle.
 The stability of repair pathway determine the
radiosensitivity of cell cycle phases.
PATHWAYS OF DNA REPAIR
 Base Excision Repair (BER)

 Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER)
 DNA Double-Strand Break Repair

1. Nonhomologous End Joining (NHEJ)
2. Homologous Recombination Repair
(HRR)
 OTHERS
 Single-Strand Annealing (SSA)
 Cross-Link Repair
 Mismatch Repair
Base Excision Repair (BER)
Singlebase mutation that is first removed by a
glycosylase/DNA lyase .
Removal of the sugar residue by an AP
endonuclease
Replacement with the correct nucleotide by DNA
polymerase

completed by DNA ligase III-XRCC1-mediated
ligation
NUCLEOTIDE EXCISION REPAIR
 Nucleotide excision repair removes bulky

adducts in the DNA such as pyrimidine
dimers.
 The process can be subdivided into pathways

1.Globel genome repair(GER)
2.Transcription coupled repair(TER)
The mechanism differs only in the detection of
lesion
 STEPS

(1) damage recognition,
(2) DNA incisions that bracket the lesion,
usually between 24 and 32 nucleotides in
length
(3) removal of the region containing the
adducts,
(4) repair synthesis to fill in the gap region
(5) DNA ligation.
 Defective NER increases sensitivity to UV-

induced DNA damage and anticancer agents
such as alkylating agents that induce bulky
adducts.
 Germline mutations in NER genes lead to

human DNA repair deficiency disorders such
as xeroderma pigmentosum
REPAIR OF DNA DSB’S
Nonhomologous End Joining
(NHEJ)
Steps
(1) end recognition(Ku hetero dimer and DNA
PKcs)
(2) end processing(Artemis protein)
(3) fill-in synthesis or end bridging(DNA
polymerase µ)
(4) ligation (XRCC4/DNA ligase IV complex )
Homologous Recombination
Repair (HRR)
 Homologous recombination repair (HRR) is a

High-fidelity mechanism of repairing DNA
DSBs.
 Its function primarly in late S/G2 is to repair
and restore the functionality of replication
forks with DNA double-strand breaks.
 HRR requires physical contact with an
undamaged chromatid or chromosome (to
serve as a template) for repair to occur.
STEPS
1. Recognition of damage(ATM protein kinase)
2. Recruitment of proteins(H2AX, BRCA1,
SMC1, Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1)
3.Resection of DNA(MRE11 )

4.Strand exchange(BRCA2 and RAD51)
5. DNA synthesis(Using undamaged strand as
primer)
6. Resolution of HOLIDAY junctions.(MMS4
and MUS81 by non-crossing over)
7.Gap filling
8.ligation
HEREDITARY SYNDROMES THAT
AFFECT RADIOSENSITIVITY
 Ataxia-Telangiectasia (AT)

 Ataxia-Telangiectasia-Like Disorder (ATLD)
 Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome (NBS)
 Fanconi Anemia (FA)
Split dose repair
 split dose repair (SDR) that manifests its
importance during fractionated radiotherapy.
 SDR describes the increased survival found if a
dose of radiation is split into two fractions
compared to the same dose administered in one
fraction.
 Molecular mechanisms for SDR are unknown,

experimental evidence suggests that this repair
is due to DNA double-strand break rejoining.
Elkind et al study on SLD
INCUBATED AT NORMAL GROWTH
CONDITIONS
 This simple experiment, performed in vitro,

illustrates three of the “four Rs” of
radiobiology: repair, reassortment, and
repopulation.
 Reassortment and repopulation appear to

have more protracted kinetics in normal
tissues than rapidly proliferating tumor cells.
RE-ASSORTMENT
 Cells change in their radiosensitivity as they

traverse the cell cycle.
 After exposure of asynchronous population of

cells to radiation those in the sensitive phase
are killed thus becomes partly synchronised.
 If allowed time between fractions they

become SELF SENSITISED.
 This phenomenonof SELF SENSITIZATION

due to movement through cell cycle is called
RE-DISTRIBUTION or RE-ASSORTMENT.
 This will occur only in a proliferating cell

population.
 Thus therapeutic ratio can be enhanced .
 The differential is greater the smaller the

dose per fraction and proportional to number
of fractions.
RELATION TO NORMAL TISSUES
Dose rate effect and inverse
dose rate effect.
 Dose rate is one of the principal factors that






determine the biological consequences of
absorbed radiation.
As dose rate
exposure time increases
Biological effect generally
This Is due to SUB LETHAL DAMAGE
REPAIR
IDEALIZED FRACTIONATION
EXPERIMENT
SURVIVAL CURVES AT WIDE DOSE
RATES
 AS Dose rate is reduced survival curve

becomes shallower and shoulder tends to
disappear.
 This is most dramatic between o.o1 and 1Gy

/min.
 Magnitude of dose rate effect varies among

types of cells
HE LA CELLS

HAMSTER CELLS
Cell lines from human origin
tends to fan out at LDR
INVERSE DOSE RATE EFFECT
 IN converse with usual phenomenon

increased cell killing is seen with decrease in
dose rate called the INVERSE DOSE RATE
EFFECT.
 This is due to phenomenon of RE-

DISTRIBUTION.
SUMMARY OF DOSE RATE EFFECT
RE-POPULATION
 It occurs as a homeostatic response to cell

depletion caused by treatment.
 It is mainly observed in
 1.Acute –Responding normal tissurs
 2.Tumors With high rate of cell production.
The cell loss after each fraction of radiation
induces compensatory cell regeneration the
extent of which determines tissue tolerance.
POTENTIAL DOUBLING TIME
 It Is The Pre Irradiation Proliferative Activity
measured by time required for the number of
clonogenic cells to double assuming cell loss
factor as zero.
 Tpot = c Ts/LI

GROWTH FRACTION=It increases following
cytoreductive therapies and leads to
ACCELERATED RE-GROWTH.
 It is assessed by increase in dose required for

tumor control as duration of treatment
increases.
OR
 For a constant dose decrease in tumor control
rate as treatment time is extended
Supporting observations
1.Time to recurrence
 One tumor cell must undergo 30 doublings to
become detectable as recurrence.
 Most recurrences in HEAD & NECK cancer
occur within 12 months after radiation
therapy.
 Median doubling time at presentation is
usually 2 months.
2.Split course treatment
These Schedules resulted in lower local control rates .

3.Protracted treatment
It resulted in decreased rate of locoregional control and
led to worse outcomes in several analyses.

For treatment durations of 30-55 days
EACH 1 DAY EXTENSION=O.6 Gy INCREASE IN TOTAL
DOSE to achieve constant rate of tumor control
4.Accelerated treatment


If accelerated tumor growth contributes to
treatment failure, acceleration of standard
treatment may benefit some tumors.

 In nonrandomized studies this improved the

local control in inflammatory breast cancer ,
melanoma metastases to brain.
 Randomized studies of accelerated

treatment of head and neck cancer validated
the benefit.
TCD50 analysis.
 These values are independent of treatment

duration up to about 28 days, after which
they increase rapidly (consistent with 0.6
Gy/day).
 Head and neck SCCs exhibit a lag period of 3

to 4 weeks before beginning to repopulate
with an average doubling time of 3 to 4 days.
Re population in oro
pharyngeal cancers
Influence of regeneration
Normal tissues
 Time to onset of repopulation after
irradiation and rate at which it proceeds vary
with the tissue.
 In humans tissue turn over kinetics are slower
than mice.
 High initial doses shorten the LAG PERIOD.
 It confers benefit by reducing toxicity in acute
responding tissues.
Growth factors may be useful in protecting
normal tissues from irradiation by shortening
the apparent lag phase and accelerating
recovery in irradiated tissues.
 Hematopoietic growth factors
 Keratinocytic growth factors
 Tumor tissues
 Like acute responding normal tissues tumors

accelerate their growth in response to injury.
ACCELERATED REPOPULATION
 It is division of surviving clonagens of cells in
a tumor at a faster rate than before being
triggered by any cytotoxic agent including
radiation.
Accelerated repopulation
PRACTICALS IMPLICATIONS OF
RE-POPULATION
1.Protracting treatment longer than necessary
will likely be a disadvantage.
 using 1.8 Gy rather than 2 Gy fractions given
five times per week extends overall treatment
time by about 10% .
 RESERVED FOR SITUATIONS IN WHICH
1.Acute responses limiting dose accumilation.
2.Ih homogenicities in dose distribution
2. If a break in treatment is necessary because
of acute toxicity, it should be kept as short as
is tolerable.
3.Planned split-course therapy is inadvisable
unless it is part of an accelerated treatment
protocol that ultimately shortens the overall
treatment duration .
4.Breaks in therapy for nonmedical reasons
(machine breakdown, holidays) may merit
catch up treatments in patients being treated
for cure
“ Rapidly growing tumors must be treated
rapidly”
Treatment should never be unnecessarily
protracted because it is difficult to predict
the accelerated repopulation response of
individual tumors.
Re-oxygenation
Effect Of Oxygen On
Radiosensitivity
 The oxygen effect was observed as early as 1912 in

Germany by Swartz. In England in the 1930s, Mottram
explored the question of oxygen in detail.
 oxygen enhancement ratio (OER).

doses administered under hypoxic condition
doses administered under aerated conditions
to achieve the same biological effect.
 It varies with 1.Type of radiation

2.Dose assay
Variation With Type Of Rays
Variation With Dose Assay
MECHANISM OF THE OXYGEN EFFECT
 The Oxygen Fixation Hypothesis
Absorption of radiation

 fast charged particles





number of ion pairs
free radicals

R+DNA=R.+ O2 =R02(FIXATION OF
DAMAGE)

break chemical bonds
chemical changes



Final expression of biologic damage
FRACTIONATION TO TACKLE HYPOXIA
 The oxygen status of cells in a tumor is not static; it is

dynamic and constantly changes.
 Proportion of hypoxic cells in the tumor is about the

same at the end of a fractionated radiotherapy regimen
as in the untreated tumor.
 During the course of the treatment hypoxic cells become

oxygenated.
 This phenomenon, by which hypoxic cells become

oxygenated after a dose of radiation, is termed
reoxygenation..
TUMOR REOXYGENATION
Time sequence of REOXYGENATION(mouse sarcoma
cells)
 RATE and EXTENT of Re-oxygenation varies
with type of tumors.
 If this is appropriately studied it can be used

in designing fractionatation shedules.
 Since pattern is not known for many human
tumors it can considered that doses on the
order of 60 Gy (6,000 rad) given in 30
treatments argues strongly in favor of
reoxygenation.
Re –oxygenation in various
tumors
Mechanism of Re-Oxygenation
 Opening up of blood vessels
 Decreased diffusion distance(70um-150um)

 Revascularization of tumor
Chemotherapy Induced
Radiosensitization
Thank you

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology
DeepaGautam
 
Evolution of Fractionation and Conventional Fractionation in Radiotherapy
Evolution of Fractionation and Conventional Fractionation in RadiotherapyEvolution of Fractionation and Conventional Fractionation in Radiotherapy
Evolution of Fractionation and Conventional Fractionation in Radiotherapy
Nikhil Sebastian
 
Time , Dose & Fractionationrevised
Time , Dose & FractionationrevisedTime , Dose & Fractionationrevised
Time , Dose & Fractionationrevised
PGIMER, AIIMS
 
Chapter 5 -repair or radiation damage and dose-rate effect - jtl
Chapter 5 -repair or radiation damage and dose-rate effect - jtlChapter 5 -repair or radiation damage and dose-rate effect - jtl
Chapter 5 -repair or radiation damage and dose-rate effect - jtl
John Lucas
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Fractionation and dose rate effect
Fractionation and dose rate effectFractionation and dose rate effect
Fractionation and dose rate effect
 
Late effects of Radiotherapy on Normal Tissues
Late effects of Radiotherapy on Normal TissuesLate effects of Radiotherapy on Normal Tissues
Late effects of Radiotherapy on Normal Tissues
 
Radiobiology
RadiobiologyRadiobiology
Radiobiology
 
4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology
 
4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology
 
TIME DOSE & FRACTIONATION
TIME DOSE & FRACTIONATIONTIME DOSE & FRACTIONATION
TIME DOSE & FRACTIONATION
 
Time, dose & fractionation,
Time, dose & fractionation,Time, dose & fractionation,
Time, dose & fractionation,
 
Evolution of Fractionation and Conventional Fractionation in Radiotherapy
Evolution of Fractionation and Conventional Fractionation in RadiotherapyEvolution of Fractionation and Conventional Fractionation in Radiotherapy
Evolution of Fractionation and Conventional Fractionation in Radiotherapy
 
LET RBE OER
LET RBE OERLET RBE OER
LET RBE OER
 
Time , Dose & Fractionationrevised
Time , Dose & FractionationrevisedTime , Dose & Fractionationrevised
Time , Dose & Fractionationrevised
 
cell survival curve
cell survival curvecell survival curve
cell survival curve
 
Linear quadratic model ppt
Linear quadratic model pptLinear quadratic model ppt
Linear quadratic model ppt
 
Oer , rbe & let
Oer , rbe & letOer , rbe & let
Oer , rbe & let
 
RADIOBIOLOGY: oxygen effect & reoxygenation
RADIOBIOLOGY: oxygen effect & reoxygenationRADIOBIOLOGY: oxygen effect & reoxygenation
RADIOBIOLOGY: oxygen effect & reoxygenation
 
BASICS RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPY
BASICS RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPYBASICS RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPY
BASICS RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPY
 
Chapter 5 -repair or radiation damage and dose-rate effect - jtl
Chapter 5 -repair or radiation damage and dose-rate effect - jtlChapter 5 -repair or radiation damage and dose-rate effect - jtl
Chapter 5 -repair or radiation damage and dose-rate effect - jtl
 
Dna response to radiotherapy
Dna response to radiotherapyDna response to radiotherapy
Dna response to radiotherapy
 
Basics of linear quadratic model
Basics of linear quadratic modelBasics of linear quadratic model
Basics of linear quadratic model
 
Cell survival curve
Cell survival curve Cell survival curve
Cell survival curve
 
Oer , rbe & let
Oer , rbe & letOer , rbe & let
Oer , rbe & let
 

Andere mochten auch

4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology
DeepaGautam
 
Radiobiology behind dose fractionation
Radiobiology behind dose fractionationRadiobiology behind dose fractionation
Radiobiology behind dose fractionation
fondas vakalis
 
Internal radiation dosimetry
Internal radiation dosimetryInternal radiation dosimetry
Internal radiation dosimetry
Naslinda Rizan
 
پایان‌نامه-صادق رضایی
پایان‌نامه-صادق رضاییپایان‌نامه-صادق رضایی
پایان‌نامه-صادق رضایی
Sadegh Rezaiee
 
Gene stability and DNA repair
Gene stability and DNA repairGene stability and DNA repair
Gene stability and DNA repair
Saurav Das
 

Andere mochten auch (19)

4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology
 
4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effects
4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effects4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effects
4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effects
 
Radiobiology behind dose fractionation
Radiobiology behind dose fractionationRadiobiology behind dose fractionation
Radiobiology behind dose fractionation
 
Radiation protection, its hazards & aerb guidelines
Radiation protection, its hazards & aerb guidelinesRadiation protection, its hazards & aerb guidelines
Radiation protection, its hazards & aerb guidelines
 
Icrp 111 in brief 822016-ss
Icrp 111 in brief 822016-ssIcrp 111 in brief 822016-ss
Icrp 111 in brief 822016-ss
 
Internal radiation dosimetry
Internal radiation dosimetryInternal radiation dosimetry
Internal radiation dosimetry
 
پایان‌نامه-صادق رضایی
پایان‌نامه-صادق رضاییپایان‌نامه-صادق رضایی
پایان‌نامه-صادق رضایی
 
Virology quiz 1
Virology quiz 1Virology quiz 1
Virology quiz 1
 
HTAi 2014 KJM van Nimwegen
HTAi 2014 KJM van NimwegenHTAi 2014 KJM van Nimwegen
HTAi 2014 KJM van Nimwegen
 
Allelic Imbalance for Pre-capture Whole Exome Sequencing
Allelic Imbalance for Pre-capture Whole Exome SequencingAllelic Imbalance for Pre-capture Whole Exome Sequencing
Allelic Imbalance for Pre-capture Whole Exome Sequencing
 
Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) is next-generation technology.
Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) is next-generation technology.Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) is next-generation technology.
Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) is next-generation technology.
 
Gene regulation in Eukaryotes
Gene regulation in EukaryotesGene regulation in Eukaryotes
Gene regulation in Eukaryotes
 
Dna Repair Mechanisms
Dna Repair MechanismsDna Repair Mechanisms
Dna Repair Mechanisms
 
Shriram belge (exome sequencing) 27 2003
Shriram belge (exome sequencing) 27  2003Shriram belge (exome sequencing) 27  2003
Shriram belge (exome sequencing) 27 2003
 
Icru 50,62,83 volume deliniation
Icru 50,62,83 volume deliniationIcru 50,62,83 volume deliniation
Icru 50,62,83 volume deliniation
 
Gene stability and DNA repair
Gene stability and DNA repairGene stability and DNA repair
Gene stability and DNA repair
 
Whole exome sequencing(wes)
Whole exome sequencing(wes)Whole exome sequencing(wes)
Whole exome sequencing(wes)
 
DNA Repair Therapies for Ovarian Cancer
DNA Repair Therapies for Ovarian CancerDNA Repair Therapies for Ovarian Cancer
DNA Repair Therapies for Ovarian Cancer
 
LET, RBE & OER - dr vandana
LET, RBE & OER - dr vandanaLET, RBE & OER - dr vandana
LET, RBE & OER - dr vandana
 

Ähnlich wie 4 r’s of radiobiology

Radiotherapy in gynaecology
Radiotherapy in gynaecologyRadiotherapy in gynaecology
Radiotherapy in gynaecology
drmcbansal
 
Fractionation in Radiotherapy
Fractionation in RadiotherapyFractionation in Radiotherapy
Fractionation in Radiotherapy
ameneh haghbin
 

Ähnlich wie 4 r’s of radiobiology (20)

Radiotherapy in gynaecology
Radiotherapy in gynaecologyRadiotherapy in gynaecology
Radiotherapy in gynaecology
 
FOUR R’S OF RADIOBIOLOGY.ppt
FOUR R’S OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptFOUR R’S OF RADIOBIOLOGY.ppt
FOUR R’S OF RADIOBIOLOGY.ppt
 
Fractionation in Radiotherapy
Fractionation in RadiotherapyFractionation in Radiotherapy
Fractionation in Radiotherapy
 
Biological effect of radiation and radiation safety
Biological effect of radiation and radiation safetyBiological effect of radiation and radiation safety
Biological effect of radiation and radiation safety
 
Chemotherapy & radiotherapy/ dental implant courses
Chemotherapy & radiotherapy/ dental implant coursesChemotherapy & radiotherapy/ dental implant courses
Chemotherapy & radiotherapy/ dental implant courses
 
Altered fractionation kiran
Altered fractionation   kiranAltered fractionation   kiran
Altered fractionation kiran
 
Principles of chemoradiations
Principles of chemoradiationsPrinciples of chemoradiations
Principles of chemoradiations
 
Radiation response modifiers
Radiation response modifiersRadiation response modifiers
Radiation response modifiers
 
Radiation Biology
Radiation BiologyRadiation Biology
Radiation Biology
 
5 Rs OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptx
5 Rs OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptx5 Rs OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptx
5 Rs OF RADIOBIOLOGY.pptx
 
Ionizing radiation protection
Ionizing radiation protectionIonizing radiation protection
Ionizing radiation protection
 
4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology
 
Kenyatta university. hmb201 dna repairdocx
Kenyatta university. hmb201 dna repairdocxKenyatta university. hmb201 dna repairdocx
Kenyatta university. hmb201 dna repairdocx
 
CELL CYCLE,.pptx
CELL CYCLE,.pptxCELL CYCLE,.pptx
CELL CYCLE,.pptx
 
6th radiobiology- cell survival curves
6th  radiobiology- cell survival curves6th  radiobiology- cell survival curves
6th radiobiology- cell survival curves
 
Radiation therapy in head and neck cancer
Radiation therapy in head and neck cancerRadiation therapy in head and neck cancer
Radiation therapy in head and neck cancer
 
BASIC RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPY
BASIC RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPYBASIC RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPY
BASIC RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPY
 
Principles of radiation therapy
Principles of radiation therapyPrinciples of radiation therapy
Principles of radiation therapy
 
Radiation Therapy Radiobiology.pptx
Radiation Therapy Radiobiology.pptxRadiation Therapy Radiobiology.pptx
Radiation Therapy Radiobiology.pptx
 
fractionatedradiationanddofractionatedradiationanddose-rateeffect-16121819124...
fractionatedradiationanddofractionatedradiationanddose-rateeffect-16121819124...fractionatedradiationanddofractionatedradiationanddose-rateeffect-16121819124...
fractionatedradiationanddofractionatedradiationanddose-rateeffect-16121819124...
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
 
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptx
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptxThe Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptx
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptx
 
Slack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 SlidesSlack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 Slides
 
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonData Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
 
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024
 
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law DevelopmentsTrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
 
Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...
Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...
Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...
 
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
 
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CV
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CVReal Time Object Detection Using Open CV
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CV
 
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
 
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with NanonetsHow to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
 
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
 
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountBreaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
 
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps ScriptAutomating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
 
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
 

4 r’s of radiobiology

  • 1. 4 R’S OF RADIOBIOLOGY Dr Nanditha Kishore
  • 2. Biological basis Cellular targets for radiation Biological factors influencing radio sensitivity Chemical modifiers of radiation response
  • 3. DNA damage by ionizing radiation  Biological effects of ionizing radiation are largely the result of DNA damage.  A.DIRECT DAMAGE :in case of high LET radiations such as ALPHA particles,nuetrons  B.INDIRECT DAMAGE:IN case of low LET radiations such as x-rays.
  • 4.
  • 5. BIOLOGICAL BASIS  A consideration of biological effects of radiation should begin with three aspects  1.Types of DNA breaks  2.Radiosensitivity in cell cycle  3.Advantages of dose fractionation
  • 6. TYPES OF DNA DAMAGE  DNA is a large molecule with a well known double helical structure.  The “backbone” of each strand consists of alternating sugar and phosphate groups.  Attached to this backbone are four bases, the sequence of which specifies the genetic code.  Pyrimidines= thymine and cytosine. Purines= adenine and guanine
  • 7.  Do DOSE=A dose of radiation that induces an      average of one lethal event per cell leaves 37% still viable . For mammalian cells X-RAY Do dose lies between 1-2 Gy. Number of DNA lesions per cell Base damage=>1000 SSB=1000 DSB=40
  • 10. Biological basis of survival curve
  • 12. The Advantages Of Dose Fractionation Include  Reduction in the number of hypoxic cells through cell killing and reoxygenation.  Reduction in the absolute number of clonogenic tumor cells by the preceding fractions with the killing of the better oxygenated cells.  Blood vessels compressed by a growing cancer are decompressed secondary to tumor regression.
  • 13.  Fractionation exploits the difference in recovery rate between normal, acute, and late-reacting tissues and tumors.  Radiation-induced redistribution of cells within the cell cycle tends to sensitize rapidly proliferating cells as they move into the more sensitive phases of the cell cycle.  The acute normal tissue toxicity of single radiation doses can be decreased with fractionation.  Thus, patients' tolerance of radiotherapy will improve with fractionated irradiation.
  • 14. Biological factors influencing radio sensitivity  Efficacy of fractionation can be related to the “Four Rs” of Radiobiology:  REPAIR OF SUBLETHAL DAMAGE  REASSORTMENT OF CELLS WITHIN THE CELL CYCLE  REPOPULATION  REOXYGENATION
  • 15. OPERATIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS OF RADIATION DAMAGE  (1) LETHAL DAMAGE= which is irreversible and irreparable and leads irrevocably to cell death;  (2) POTENTIALLY LETHAL DAMAGE (PLD)= The component of radiation damage that can be modified by postirradiation environmental conditions.  (3) SUBLETHAL DAMAGE (SLD)=which under normal circumstances can be repaired in hours unless additional sublethal damage is added
  • 16. TYPES OF DNA REPAIR  Mammalian cells have developed specialized pathways to sense, respond to, and repair these different types of damage.  Different repair pathways are used to repair DNA damage, depending on the stage of the cell cycle.  The stability of repair pathway determine the radiosensitivity of cell cycle phases.
  • 17. PATHWAYS OF DNA REPAIR  Base Excision Repair (BER)  Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER)  DNA Double-Strand Break Repair 1. Nonhomologous End Joining (NHEJ) 2. Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR)
  • 18.  OTHERS  Single-Strand Annealing (SSA)  Cross-Link Repair  Mismatch Repair
  • 19. Base Excision Repair (BER) Singlebase mutation that is first removed by a glycosylase/DNA lyase . Removal of the sugar residue by an AP endonuclease Replacement with the correct nucleotide by DNA polymerase completed by DNA ligase III-XRCC1-mediated ligation
  • 20.
  • 21. NUCLEOTIDE EXCISION REPAIR  Nucleotide excision repair removes bulky adducts in the DNA such as pyrimidine dimers.  The process can be subdivided into pathways 1.Globel genome repair(GER) 2.Transcription coupled repair(TER) The mechanism differs only in the detection of lesion
  • 22.  STEPS (1) damage recognition, (2) DNA incisions that bracket the lesion, usually between 24 and 32 nucleotides in length (3) removal of the region containing the adducts, (4) repair synthesis to fill in the gap region (5) DNA ligation.
  • 23.
  • 24.  Defective NER increases sensitivity to UV- induced DNA damage and anticancer agents such as alkylating agents that induce bulky adducts.  Germline mutations in NER genes lead to human DNA repair deficiency disorders such as xeroderma pigmentosum
  • 25. REPAIR OF DNA DSB’S
  • 26. Nonhomologous End Joining (NHEJ) Steps (1) end recognition(Ku hetero dimer and DNA PKcs) (2) end processing(Artemis protein) (3) fill-in synthesis or end bridging(DNA polymerase µ) (4) ligation (XRCC4/DNA ligase IV complex )
  • 27.
  • 28. Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR)  Homologous recombination repair (HRR) is a High-fidelity mechanism of repairing DNA DSBs.  Its function primarly in late S/G2 is to repair and restore the functionality of replication forks with DNA double-strand breaks.  HRR requires physical contact with an undamaged chromatid or chromosome (to serve as a template) for repair to occur.
  • 29. STEPS 1. Recognition of damage(ATM protein kinase) 2. Recruitment of proteins(H2AX, BRCA1, SMC1, Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1) 3.Resection of DNA(MRE11 ) 4.Strand exchange(BRCA2 and RAD51)
  • 30. 5. DNA synthesis(Using undamaged strand as primer) 6. Resolution of HOLIDAY junctions.(MMS4 and MUS81 by non-crossing over) 7.Gap filling 8.ligation
  • 31.
  • 32. HEREDITARY SYNDROMES THAT AFFECT RADIOSENSITIVITY  Ataxia-Telangiectasia (AT)  Ataxia-Telangiectasia-Like Disorder (ATLD)  Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome (NBS)  Fanconi Anemia (FA)
  • 33. Split dose repair  split dose repair (SDR) that manifests its importance during fractionated radiotherapy.  SDR describes the increased survival found if a dose of radiation is split into two fractions compared to the same dose administered in one fraction.  Molecular mechanisms for SDR are unknown, experimental evidence suggests that this repair is due to DNA double-strand break rejoining.
  • 34. Elkind et al study on SLD
  • 35. INCUBATED AT NORMAL GROWTH CONDITIONS
  • 36.  This simple experiment, performed in vitro, illustrates three of the “four Rs” of radiobiology: repair, reassortment, and repopulation.  Reassortment and repopulation appear to have more protracted kinetics in normal tissues than rapidly proliferating tumor cells.
  • 37.
  • 38. RE-ASSORTMENT  Cells change in their radiosensitivity as they traverse the cell cycle.  After exposure of asynchronous population of cells to radiation those in the sensitive phase are killed thus becomes partly synchronised.  If allowed time between fractions they become SELF SENSITISED.
  • 39.  This phenomenonof SELF SENSITIZATION due to movement through cell cycle is called RE-DISTRIBUTION or RE-ASSORTMENT.  This will occur only in a proliferating cell population.  Thus therapeutic ratio can be enhanced .  The differential is greater the smaller the dose per fraction and proportional to number of fractions.
  • 41. Dose rate effect and inverse dose rate effect.
  • 42.  Dose rate is one of the principal factors that     determine the biological consequences of absorbed radiation. As dose rate exposure time increases Biological effect generally This Is due to SUB LETHAL DAMAGE REPAIR
  • 44. SURVIVAL CURVES AT WIDE DOSE RATES  AS Dose rate is reduced survival curve becomes shallower and shoulder tends to disappear.  This is most dramatic between o.o1 and 1Gy /min.  Magnitude of dose rate effect varies among types of cells
  • 46. Cell lines from human origin tends to fan out at LDR
  • 47. INVERSE DOSE RATE EFFECT  IN converse with usual phenomenon increased cell killing is seen with decrease in dose rate called the INVERSE DOSE RATE EFFECT.  This is due to phenomenon of RE- DISTRIBUTION.
  • 48.
  • 49. SUMMARY OF DOSE RATE EFFECT
  • 50. RE-POPULATION  It occurs as a homeostatic response to cell depletion caused by treatment.  It is mainly observed in  1.Acute –Responding normal tissurs  2.Tumors With high rate of cell production. The cell loss after each fraction of radiation induces compensatory cell regeneration the extent of which determines tissue tolerance.
  • 51. POTENTIAL DOUBLING TIME  It Is The Pre Irradiation Proliferative Activity measured by time required for the number of clonogenic cells to double assuming cell loss factor as zero.  Tpot = c Ts/LI GROWTH FRACTION=It increases following cytoreductive therapies and leads to ACCELERATED RE-GROWTH.
  • 52.  It is assessed by increase in dose required for tumor control as duration of treatment increases. OR  For a constant dose decrease in tumor control rate as treatment time is extended
  • 53. Supporting observations 1.Time to recurrence  One tumor cell must undergo 30 doublings to become detectable as recurrence.  Most recurrences in HEAD & NECK cancer occur within 12 months after radiation therapy.  Median doubling time at presentation is usually 2 months.
  • 54. 2.Split course treatment These Schedules resulted in lower local control rates . 3.Protracted treatment It resulted in decreased rate of locoregional control and led to worse outcomes in several analyses. For treatment durations of 30-55 days EACH 1 DAY EXTENSION=O.6 Gy INCREASE IN TOTAL DOSE to achieve constant rate of tumor control
  • 55. 4.Accelerated treatment  If accelerated tumor growth contributes to treatment failure, acceleration of standard treatment may benefit some tumors.  In nonrandomized studies this improved the local control in inflammatory breast cancer , melanoma metastases to brain.  Randomized studies of accelerated treatment of head and neck cancer validated the benefit.
  • 56. TCD50 analysis.  These values are independent of treatment duration up to about 28 days, after which they increase rapidly (consistent with 0.6 Gy/day).  Head and neck SCCs exhibit a lag period of 3 to 4 weeks before beginning to repopulate with an average doubling time of 3 to 4 days.
  • 57. Re population in oro pharyngeal cancers
  • 58. Influence of regeneration Normal tissues  Time to onset of repopulation after irradiation and rate at which it proceeds vary with the tissue.  In humans tissue turn over kinetics are slower than mice.  High initial doses shorten the LAG PERIOD.  It confers benefit by reducing toxicity in acute responding tissues.
  • 59. Growth factors may be useful in protecting normal tissues from irradiation by shortening the apparent lag phase and accelerating recovery in irradiated tissues.  Hematopoietic growth factors  Keratinocytic growth factors
  • 60.
  • 61.  Tumor tissues  Like acute responding normal tissues tumors accelerate their growth in response to injury. ACCELERATED REPOPULATION  It is division of surviving clonagens of cells in a tumor at a faster rate than before being triggered by any cytotoxic agent including radiation.
  • 63. PRACTICALS IMPLICATIONS OF RE-POPULATION 1.Protracting treatment longer than necessary will likely be a disadvantage.  using 1.8 Gy rather than 2 Gy fractions given five times per week extends overall treatment time by about 10% .  RESERVED FOR SITUATIONS IN WHICH 1.Acute responses limiting dose accumilation. 2.Ih homogenicities in dose distribution
  • 64. 2. If a break in treatment is necessary because of acute toxicity, it should be kept as short as is tolerable. 3.Planned split-course therapy is inadvisable unless it is part of an accelerated treatment protocol that ultimately shortens the overall treatment duration . 4.Breaks in therapy for nonmedical reasons (machine breakdown, holidays) may merit catch up treatments in patients being treated for cure
  • 65. “ Rapidly growing tumors must be treated rapidly” Treatment should never be unnecessarily protracted because it is difficult to predict the accelerated repopulation response of individual tumors.
  • 67. Effect Of Oxygen On Radiosensitivity  The oxygen effect was observed as early as 1912 in Germany by Swartz. In England in the 1930s, Mottram explored the question of oxygen in detail.  oxygen enhancement ratio (OER). doses administered under hypoxic condition doses administered under aerated conditions to achieve the same biological effect.  It varies with 1.Type of radiation 2.Dose assay
  • 70. MECHANISM OF THE OXYGEN EFFECT  The Oxygen Fixation Hypothesis Absorption of radiation   fast charged particles     number of ion pairs free radicals R+DNA=R.+ O2 =R02(FIXATION OF DAMAGE) break chemical bonds chemical changes  Final expression of biologic damage
  • 71. FRACTIONATION TO TACKLE HYPOXIA  The oxygen status of cells in a tumor is not static; it is dynamic and constantly changes.  Proportion of hypoxic cells in the tumor is about the same at the end of a fractionated radiotherapy regimen as in the untreated tumor.  During the course of the treatment hypoxic cells become oxygenated.  This phenomenon, by which hypoxic cells become oxygenated after a dose of radiation, is termed reoxygenation..
  • 73. Time sequence of REOXYGENATION(mouse sarcoma cells)
  • 74.  RATE and EXTENT of Re-oxygenation varies with type of tumors.  If this is appropriately studied it can be used in designing fractionatation shedules.  Since pattern is not known for many human tumors it can considered that doses on the order of 60 Gy (6,000 rad) given in 30 treatments argues strongly in favor of reoxygenation.
  • 75. Re –oxygenation in various tumors
  • 76. Mechanism of Re-Oxygenation  Opening up of blood vessels  Decreased diffusion distance(70um-150um)  Revascularization of tumor