SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 90
14 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
14 Material Requirements
Planning (MRP) and ERP
PowerPoint presentation to accompany
Heizer and Render
Operations Management, 10e
Principles of Operations Management, 8e
PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl
14 - 2© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Outline
 Global Company Profile: Wheeled
Coach
 Dependent Demand
 Dependent Inventory Model
Requirements
 Master Production Schedule
 Bills of Material
 Accurate Inventory Records
 Purchase Orders Outstanding
 Lead Times for Components
14 - 3© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Outline – Continued
 MRP Structure
 MRP Management
 MRP Dynamics
 MRP and JIT
 Lot-Sizing Techniques
14 - 4© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Outline – Continued
 Extensions of MRP
 Material Requirements Planning II
(MRP II)
 Closed-Loop MRP
 Capacity Planning
 MRP In Services
 Distribution Resource Planning
(DRP)
14 - 5© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Outline – Continued
 Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
 Advantages and Disadvantages of
ERP Systems
 ERP in the Service Sector
14 - 6© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Learning Objectives
When you complete this chapter you
should be able to:
1. Develop a product structure
2. Build a gross requirements plan
3. Build a net requirements plan
4. Determine lot sizes for lot-for-lot,
EOQ, and PPB
14 - 7© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Learning Objectives
When you complete this chapter you
should be able to:
5. Describe MRP II
6. Describe closed-loop MRP
7. Describe ERP
14 - 8© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Wheeled Coach
 Largest manufacturer of
ambulances in the world
 International competitor
 12 major ambulance designs
 18,000 different inventory items
 6,000 manufactured parts
 12,000 purchased parts
14 - 9© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Wheeled Coach
 Four Key Tasks
 Material plan must meet both the
requirements of the master schedule
and the capabilities of the
production facility
 Plan must be executed as designed
 Minimize inventory investment
 Maintain excellent record integrity
14 - 10© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Dependent Demand
For any product for which a schedule
can be established, dependent
demand techniques should be used
14 - 11© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Dependent Demand
Benefits of MRP
1. Better response to customer
orders
2. Faster response to market changes
3. Improved utilization of facilities
and labor
4. Reduced inventory levels
14 - 12© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Dependent Demand
 The demand for one item is related
to the demand for another item
 Given a quantity for the end item,
the demand for all parts and
components can be calculated
 In general, used whenever a
schedule can be established for an
item
 MRP is the common technique
14 - 13© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Dependent Demand
1. Master production schedule
2. Specifications or bill of material
3. Inventory availability
4. Purchase orders outstanding
5. Lead times
Effective use of dependent demand
inventory models requires the
following
14 - 14© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Master Production Schedule
(MPS)
 Specifies what is to be made and when
 Must be in accordance with the aggregate
production plan
 Inputs from financial plans, customer
demand, engineering, supplier performance
 As the process moves from planning to
execution, each step must be tested for
feasibility
 The MPS is the result of the production
planning process
14 - 15© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Master Production Schedule
(MPS)
 MPS is established in terms of specific
products
 Schedule must be followed for a
reasonable length of time
 The MPS is quite often fixed or frozen in
the near term part of the plan
 The MPS is a rolling schedule
 The MPS is a statement of what is to be
produced, not a forecast of demand
14 - 16© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Figure 14.1
Change
production
plan?Master production
schedule
Management
Return on
investment
Capital
Engineering
Design
completion
Aggregate
production
plan
Procurement
Supplier
performance
Human resources
Manpower
planning
Production
Capacity
Inventory
Marketing
Customer
demand
Finance
Cash flow
The Planning Process
14 - 17© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Planning Process
Figure 14.1
Is capacity
plan being
met?
Is execution
meeting the
plan?
Change
master
production
schedule?
Change
capacity?
Change
requirements?
No
Execute
material plans
Execute capacity
plans
Yes
Realistic?
Capacity
requirements plan
Material
requirements plan
Master production
schedule
14 - 18© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Aggregate
Production Plan
Months January February
Aggregate Production Plan 1,500 1,200
(Shows the total
quantity of amplifiers)
Weeks 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Master Production Schedule
(Shows the specific type and
quantity of amplifier to be
produced
240-watt amplifier 100 100 100 100
150-watt amplifier 500 500 450 450
75-watt amplifier 300 100
Figure 14.2
14 - 19© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Master Production Schedule
(MPS)
1. A customer order in a job shop (make-
to-order) company
2. Modules in a repetitive (assemble-to-
order or forecast) company
3. An end item in a continuous (stock-to-
forecast) company
Can be expressed in any of the
following terms:
14 - 20© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Focus for Different
Process Strategies
Stock to Forecast
(Product Focus)
Schedule finished
product
Assemble to Order
or Forecast
(Repetitive)
Schedule modules
Make to Order
(Process Focus)
Schedule orders
Examples: Print shop Motorcycles Steel, Beer, Bread
Machine shop Autos, TVs Lightbulbs
Fine-dining restaurant Fast-food restaurant Paper
Typical focus of the
master production
schedule
Number of
inputs
Number of
end items
Figure 14.3
14 - 21© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
MPS Examples
Gross Requirements for Crabmeat Quiche
Gross Requirements for Spinach Quiche
Day 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 and so on
Amount 50 100 47 60 110 75
Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 and so on
Amount 100 200 150 60 75 100
Table 14.1
For Nancy’s Specialty Foods
14 - 22© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Bills of Material
 List of components, ingredients,
and materials needed to make
product
 Provides product structure
 Items above given level are called
parents
 Items below given level are called
children
14 - 23© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
BOM Example
B(2) Std. 12” Speaker kit C(3)
Std. 12” Speaker kit w/
amp-booster1
E(2)E(2) F(2)
Packing box and
installation kit of wire,
bolts, and screws
Std. 12” Speaker
booster assembly
2
D(2)
12” Speaker
D(2)
12” Speaker
G(1)
Amp-booster
3
Product structure for “Awesome” (A)
A
Level
0
14 - 24© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
BOM Example
B(2) Std. 12” Speaker kit C(3)
Std. 12” Speaker kit w/
amp-booster1
E(2)E(2) F(2)
Packing box and
installation kit of wire,
bolts, and screws
Std. 12” Speaker
booster assembly
2
D(2)
12” Speaker
D(2)
12” Speaker
G(1)
Amp-booster
3
Product structure for “Awesome” (A)
A
Level
0
Part B: 2 x number of As = (2)(50) = 100
Part C: 3 x number of As = (3)(50) = 150
Part D: 2 x number of Bs
+ 2 x number of Fs = (2)(100) + (2)(300) = 800
Part E: 2 x number of Bs
+ 2 x number of Cs = (2)(100) + (2)(150) = 500
Part F: 2 x number of Cs = (2)(150) = 300
Part G: 1 x number of Fs = (1)(300) = 300
14 - 25© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Bills of Material
 Modular Bills
 Modules are not final products but
components that can be assembled
into multiple end items
 Can significantly simplify planning
and scheduling
14 - 26© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Bills of Material
 Planning Bills
 Also called “pseudo” or super bills
 Created to assign an artificial
parent to the BOM
 Used to group subassemblies to
reduce the number of items planned
and scheduled
 Used to create standard “kits” for
production
14 - 27© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Bills of Material
 Phantom Bills
Describe subassemblies that exist
only temporarily
Are part of another assembly and
never go into inventory
 Low-Level Coding
Item is coded at the lowest level at
which it occurs
BOMs are processed one level at a time
14 - 28© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Accurate Records
 Accurate inventory records are
absolutely required for MRP (or
any dependent demand system) to
operate correctly
 Generally MRP systems require
more than 99% accuracy
 Outstanding purchase orders must
accurately reflect quantities and
scheduled receipts
14 - 29© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Lead Times
 The time required to purchase,
produce, or assemble an item
 For production – the sum of the
order, wait, move, setup, store,
and run times
 For purchased items – the time
between the recognition of a need
and the availability of the item for
production
14 - 30© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Time-Phased Product
Structure
| | | | | | | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Time in weeks
F
2 weeks
3 weeks
1 week
A
2 weeks
1 week
D
E
2 weeks
D
G
1 week
Start production of D
Must have D and E
completed here so
production can
begin on B
Figure 14.4
1 week
2 weeks to
produce
B
C
E
14 - 31© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
MRP Structure
Figure 14.5
Output Reports
MRP by
period report
MRP by
date report
Planned order
report
Purchase advice
Exception reports
Order early or late
or not needed
Order quantity too
small or too large
Data Files
Purchasing data
BOM
Lead times
(Item master file)
Inventory data
Master
production schedule
Material
requirement
planning
programs
(computer and
software)
14 - 32© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Determining Gross
Requirements
 Starts with a production schedule for the
end item – 50 units of Item A in week 8
 Using the lead time for the item,
determine the week in which the order
should be released – a 1 week lead time
means the order for 50 units should be
released in week 7
 This step is often called “lead time
offset” or “time phasing”
14 - 33© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Determining Gross
Requirements
 From the BOM, every Item A requires 2
Item Bs – 100 Item Bs are required in
week 7 to satisfy the order release for
Item A
 The lead time for the Item B is 2 weeks –
release an order for 100 units of Item B in
week 5
 The timing and quantity for component
requirements are determined by the order
release of the parent(s)
14 - 34© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Determining Gross
Requirements
 The process continues through the entire
BOM one level at a time – often called
“explosion”
 By processing the BOM by level, items
with multiple parents are only processed
once, saving time and resources and
reducing confusion
 Low-level coding ensures that each item
appears at only one level in the BOM
14 - 35© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Gross Requirements Plan
Table 14.3
Week
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Lead Time
A. Required date 50
Order release date 50 1 week
B. Required date 100
Order release date 100 2 weeks
C. Required date 150
Order release date 150 1 week
E. Required date 200 300
Order release date 200 300 2 weeks
F. Required date 300
Order release date 300 3 weeks
D. Required date 600 200
Order release date 600 200 1 week
G. Required date 300
Order release date 300 2 weeks
14 - 36© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Net Requirements Plan
14 - 37© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Net Requirements Plan
14 - 38© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Determining Net
Requirements
 Starts with a production schedule for the
end item – 50 units of Item A in week 8
 Because there are 10 Item As on hand,
only 40 are actually required – (net
requirement) = (gross requirement - on-
hand inventory)
 The planned order receipt for Item A in
week 8 is 40 units – 40 = 50 - 10
14 - 39© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Determining Net
Requirements
 Following the lead time offset procedure,
the planned order release for Item A is
now 40 units in week 7
 The gross requirement for Item B is now
80 units in week 7
 There are 15 units of Item B on hand, so
the net requirement is 65 units in week 7
 A planned order receipt of 65 units in
week 7 generates a planned order release
of 65 units in week 5
14 - 40© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Determining Net
Requirements
 A planned order receipt of 65 units in
week 7 generates a planned order release
of 65 units in week 5
 The on-hand inventory record for Item B
is updated to reflect the use of the 15
items in inventory and shows no on-hand
inventory in week 8
 This is referred to as the Gross-to-Net
calculation and is the third basic function
of the MRP process
14 - 41© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
S
B C
12 138 9 10 11
20 3040
Lead time = 6 for S
Master schedule for S
Gross Requirements
Schedule
Figure 14.6
1 2 3
10 10
Master schedule
for B
sold directly
Periods
Therefore, these
are the gross
requirements for B
Gross requirements: B 10 40 50 2040+10 15+30
=50 =45
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Periods
A
B C
Lead time = 4 for A
Master schedule for A
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
40 1550
14 - 42© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Net Requirements Plan
The logic of net requirements
Available inventory
Net
requirements
On
hand
Scheduled
receipts+– =
Total requirements
Gross
requirements
Allocations+
14 - 43© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
MRP Planning Sheet
Figure 14.7
14 - 44© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Safety Stock
 BOMs, inventory records, purchase and
production quantities may not be perfect
 Consideration of safety stock may be
prudent
 Should be minimized and ultimately
eliminated
 Typically built into projected on-hand
inventory
14 - 45© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
MRP Management
 MRP is a dynamic system
 Facilitates replanning when changes occur
 Regenerating
 Net change
 System nervousness can result from too
many changes
 Time fences put limits on replanning
 Pegging links each item to its parent
allowing effective analysis of changes
14 - 46© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
MRP and JIT
 MRP is a planning system that
does not do detailed scheduling
 MRP requires fixed lead times
which might actually vary with
batch size
 JIT excels at rapidly moving small
batches of material through the
system
14 - 47© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Finite Capacity Scheduling
 MRP systems do not consider
capacity during normal planning
cycles
 Finite capacity scheduling (FCS)
recognizes actual capacity limits
 By merging MRP and FCS, a finite
schedule is created with feasible
capacities which facilitates rapid
material movement
14 - 48© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Small Bucket Approach
1. MRP “buckets” are reduced to daily or hourly
2. Planned receipts are used internally to
sequence production
3. Inventory is moved through the plant on a JIT
basis
4. Completed products are moved to finished
goods inventory which reduces required
quantities for subsequent planned orders
5. Back flushing based on the BOM is used to
deduct inventory that was used in production
14 - 49© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Balanced Flow
 Used in repetitive operations
 MRP plans are
executed using
JIT techniques
based on “pull”
principles
 Flows are carefully
balanced with
small lot sizes
14 - 50© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Supermarket
 Items used by many products are
held in a common area often called
a supermarket
 Items are withdrawn as needed
 Inventory is maintained using JIT
systems and procedures
 Common items are not planned by
the MRP system
14 - 51© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Lot-Sizing Techniques
 Lot-for-lot techniques order just what
is required for production based on
net requirements
 May not always be feasible
 If setup costs are high, lot-for-lot can
be expensive
 Economic order quantity (EOQ)
 EOQ expects a known constant
demand and MRP systems often deal
with unknown and variable demand
14 - 52© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Lot-Sizing Techniques
 Part Period Balancing (PPB) looks at
future orders to determine most
economic lot size
 The Wagner-Whitin algorithm is a
complex dynamic programming
technique
 Assumes a finite time horizon
 Effective, but computationally
burdensome
14 - 53© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Lot-for-Lot Example
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Gross
requirements
35 30 40 0 10 40 30 0 30 55
Scheduled
receipts
Projected on
hand
35 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Net
requirements
0 30 40 0 10 40 30 0 30 55
Planned order
receipts
30 40 10 40 30 30 55
Planned order
releases
30 40 10 40 30 30 55
Holding cost = $1/week; Setup cost = $100; Lead time = 1 week
14 - 54© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Lot-for-Lot Example
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Gross
requirements
35 30 40 0 10 40 30 0 30 55
Scheduled
receipts
Projected on
hand
35 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Net
requirements
0 30 40 0 10 40 30 0 30 55
Planned order
receipts
30 40 10 40 30 30 55
Planned order
releases
30 40 10 40 30 30 55
Holding cost = $1/week; Setup cost = $100; Lead time = 1 week
No on-hand inventory is carried through the system
Total holding cost = $0
There are seven setups for this item in this plan
Total ordering cost = 7 x $100 = $700
14 - 55© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
EOQ Lot Size Example
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Gross
requirements
35 30 40 0 10 40 30 0 30 55
Scheduled
receipts
Projected on
hand
35 35 0 43 3 3 66 26 69 69 39
Net
requirements
0 30 0 0 7 0 4 0 0 16
Planned order
receipts
73 73 73 73
Planned order
releases
73 73 73 73
Holding cost = $1/week; Setup cost = $100; Lead time = 1 week
Average weekly gross requirements = 27; EOQ = 73 units
14 - 56© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
EOQ Lot Size Example
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Gross
requirements
35 30 40 0 10 40 30 0 30 55
Scheduled
receipts
Projected on
hand
35 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Net
requirements
0 30 0 0 7 0 4 0 0 16
Planned order
receipts
73 73 73 73
Planned order
releases
73 73 73 73
Holding cost = $1/week; Setup cost = $100; Lead time = 1 week
Average weekly gross requirements = 27; EOQ = 73 units
Annual demand = 1,404
Total cost = setup cost + holding cost
Total cost = (1,404/73) x $100 + (73/2) x ($1 x 52 weeks)
Total cost = $3,798
Cost for 10 weeks = $3,798 x (10 weeks/52 weeks) =
$730
14 - 57© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
PPB Example
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Gross
requirements
35 30 40 0 10 40 30 0 30 55
Scheduled
receipts
Projected on
hand
35
Net
requirements
Planned order
receipts
Planned order
releases
Holding cost = $1/week; Setup cost = $100; Lead time = 1 week
EPP = 100 units
14 - 58© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
PPB Example
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Gross
requirements
35 30 40 0 10 40 30 0 30 55
Scheduled
receipts
Projected on
hand
35
Net
requirements
Planned order
receipts
Planned order
releases
Holding cost = $1/week; Setup cost = $100;
EPP = 100 units
2 30 0
2, 3 70 40 = 40 x 1
2, 3, 4 70 40
2, 3, 4, 5 80 70 = 40 x 1 + 10 x 3 100 70 170
2, 3, 4, 5, 6 120 230 = 40 x 1 + 10 x 3
+ 40 x 4
+ =
Combine periods 2 - 5 as this results in the Part Period
closest to the EPP
Combine periods 6 - 9 as this results in the Part Period
closest to the EPP
6 40 0
6, 7 70 30 = 30 x 1
6, 7, 8 70 30 = 30 x 1 + 0 x 2
6, 7, 8, 9 100 120 = 30 x 1 + 30 x 3 100 120 220+ =
10 55 0 100 0 100
Total cost 300 190 490
+ =
+ =
Trial Lot Size
Periods (cumulative net Costs
Combined requirements) Part Periods Setup Holding Total
14 - 59© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
PPB Example
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Gross
requirements
35 30 40 0 10 40 30 0 30 55
Scheduled
receipts
Projected on
hand
35 35 0 50 10 10 0 60 30 30 0
Net
requirements
0 30 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 55
Planned order
receipts
80 100 55
Planned order
releases
80 100 55
Holding cost = $1/week; Setup cost = $100; Lead time = 1 week
EPP = 100 units
14 - 60© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Lot-Sizing Summary
For these three examples
Lot-for-lot $700
EOQ $730
PPB $490
14 - 61© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Lot-Sizing Summary
 In theory, lot sizes should be recomputed
whenever there is a lot size or order
quantity change
 In practice, this results in system
nervousness and instability
 Lot-for-lot should
be used when
low-cost JIT can
be achieved
14 - 62© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Lot-Sizing Summary
 Lot sizes can be modified to allow for
scrap, process constraints, and
purchase lots
 Use lot-sizing with care as it can cause
considerable distortion of requirements
at lower levels of the BOM
 When setup costs are significant and
demand is reasonably smooth, PPB,
Wagner-Whitin, or EOQ should give
reasonable results
14 - 63© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Extensions of MRP
 MRP II
 Closed-Loop MRP
 MRP system provides input to the capacity
plan, MPS, and production planning process
 Capacity Planning
 MRP system generates a load report which
details capacity requirements
 This is used to drive the capacity planning
process
 Changes pass back through the MRP system
for rescheduling
14 - 64© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Material Requirements
Planning II
 Requirement data can be enriched by
other resources
 Generally called MRP II or Material
Resource Planning
 Outputs include
 Scrap
 Packaging waste
 Carbon emissions
 Data used by purchasing, production
scheduling, capacity planning, inventory
14 - 65© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Material Resource Planning
Weeks
LT 5 6 7 8
Computer 1 100
Labor Hrs: .2 each 20
Machine Hrs: .2 each 20
Scrap: 1 ounce fiberglass each 6.25 lbs
Payables: $0 each $0
PC Board (1 each) 2 100
Labor Hrs: .15 each 15
Machine Hrs: .1 each 10
Scrap: .5 ounces copper each 3.125 lb
Payables: raw material at $5 each $500
Processor (5 each) 4 500
Labor Hrs: .2 each 100
Machine Hrs: .2 each 100
Scrap: .01 ounces of acid waste each 0.3125 lb
Payables: processors at $10 each $5,000
Table 14.4
14 - 66© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Closed-Loop MRP System
Figure 14.8
Priority Management
Develop Master Production
Schedule
Prepare Materials
Requirements Pan
Detailed Production
Activity Control
(Shop Scheduling/Dispatching)
Capacity Management
Evaluate Resource Availability
(Rough Cut)
Determine Capacity Availability
Implement Input/Output Control
Aggregate Production Plan
OK?
NO
OK?
NO OK? YES
OK? YES
Planning
Execution
(in repetitive
systems JIT
techniques
are used)
14 - 67© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Capacity Planning
 Feedback from the MRP system
 Load reports show resource
requirements for work centers
 Work can be moved between work
centers to smooth the load or bring
it within capacity
14 - 68© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Smoothing Tactics
1. Overlapping
 Sends part of the work to following
operations before the entire lot is complete
 Reduces lead time
2. Operations splitting
 Sends the lot to two different machines for
the same operation
 Shorter throughput time but increased setup
costs
3. Order or lot splitting
 Breaking up the order into smaller lots and
running part earlier (or later) in the schedule
14 - 69© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Order Splitting
 Develop a capacity plan for a work cell at
Wiz Products
 There are 12 hours available each day
 Each order requires 1 hour
Day 1 2 3 4 5
Orders 10 14 13 10 14
14 - 70© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Order Splitting
Day
Units
Ordered
Capacity
Required
(hours)
Capacity
Available
(hours)
Utilization:
Over/
(Under)
(hours)
Production
Planner’s Action
New
Production
Schedule
1 10 10 12 (2) 12
2 14 14 12 2 Split order:
move 2 units to
day 1
12
3 13 13 12 1 Split order:
move one unit
to day 6 or
request
overtime
13
4 10 10 12 (2) 12
5 14 14 12 2 Split order:
move 2 units to
day 4
12
61
14 - 71© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Order Splitting
Figure 14.9
Available
capacity
Capacity exceeded
on days 2, 3, and 5
2 orders moved to day 1 from
day 2 (a day early)
1 order forced to overtime
or to day 6
2 orders moved to
day 4 (a day early)
14 –
12 –
10 –
8 –
6 –
4 –
2 –
0 –
1 2 3 4 5
Days
(b)
Standardlabor-Hours
14 –
12 –
10 –
8 –
6 –
4 –
2 –
0 –
1 2 3 4 5
Days
(a)
Standardlabor-Hours
14 - 72© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
MRP in Services
 Some services or service items are
directly linked to demand for other
services
 These can be treated as dependent
demand services or items
 Restaurants
 Hospitals
 Hotels
14 - 73© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Uncooked
linguini
#30004
Sauce
#30006
Veal
#30005
MRP in Services
Chef;
Work
Center #1
Helper one;
Work
Center #2
Asst. Chef;
Work
Center #3
Cooked
linguini
#20002
Spinach
#20004
Prepared veal
and sauce
#20003
(a) PRODUCT STRUCTURE TREE
Veal
picante
#10001
Figure 14.10
14 - 74© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
MRP in Services
(b) BILL OF MATERIALS
Part
Number Description Quantity
Unit of
Measure
Unit
cost
10001 Veal picante 1 Serving —
20002 Cooked linguini 1 Serving —
20003 Prepared veal and sauce 1 Serving —
20004 Spinach 0.1 Bag 0.94
30004 Uncooked linguini 0.5 Pound —
30005 Veal 1 Serving 2.15
30006 Sauce 1 Serving 0.80
14 - 75© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
MRP in Services
(c) BILL OF LABOR FOR VEAL PICANTE
Labor Hours
Work Center Operation Labor Type Setup Time Run Time
1 Assemble dish Chef .0069 .0041
2 Cook linguini Helper one .0005 .0022
3 Cook veal
and sauce
Assistant Chef
.0125 .0500
14 - 76© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Distribution Resource
Planning (DRP)
Using dependent demand techniques
through the supply chain
 Expected demand or sales forecasts
become gross requirements
 Minimum levels of inventory to meet
customer service levels
 Accurate lead times
 Definition of the distribution structure
14 - 77© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Enterprise Resource
Planning (ERP)
 An extension of the MRP system to
tie in customers and suppliers
 Allows automation and integration of
many business processes
 Shares common data bases and
business practices
 Produces information in real time
 Coordinates business from supplier
evaluation to customer invoicing
14 - 78© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Enterprise Resource
Planning (ERP)
 ERP modules include
 Basic MRP
 Finance
 Human resources
 Supply chain management (SCM)
 Customer relationship management
(CRM)
14 - 79© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
ERP and MRP
Figure 14.11
14 - 80© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
ERP and MRP
Figure 14.11
Customer Relationship Management
Invoicing
Shipping
Distributors,
retailers,
and end users
Sales Order
(order entry,
product configuration,
sales management)
14 - 81© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Table 13.6
Bills of
Material
Work
Orders
Purchasing
and
Lead Times
Routings
and
Lead Times
Master
Production
Schedule
Inventory
Management
ERP and MRP
Figure 14.11
MRP
14 - 82© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
ERP and MRP
Figure 14.11
Supply Chain Management
Vendor Communication
(schedules, EDI, advanced shipping notice,
e-commerce, etc.)
14 - 83© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
ERP and MRP
Figure 14.11Table 13.6
Finance/
Accounting
General
Ledger
Accounts
Receivable
Payroll
Accounts
Payable
14 - 84© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Enterprise Resource
Planning (ERP)
 ERP can be highly customized to
meet specific business requirements
 Enterprise application integration
software (EAI) allows ERP systems
to be integrated with
 Warehouse management
 Logistics
 Electronic catalogs
 Quality management
14 - 85© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Enterprise Resource
Planning (ERP)
 ERP systems have the potential to
 Reduce transaction costs
 Increase the speed and accuracy of
information
 Facilitates a strategic emphasis on
JIT systems and integration
14 - 86© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
SAP’s ERP Modules
Figure 14.12
14 - 87© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Advantages of ERP
Systems
1. Provides integration of the supply chain,
production, and administration
2. Creates commonality of databases
3. Can incorporate improved best processes
4. Increases communication and
collaboration between business units and
sites
5. Has an off-the-shelf software database
6. May provide a strategic advantage
14 - 88© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Disadvantages of ERP
Systems
1. Is very expensive to purchase and even
more so to customize
2. Implementation may require major changes
in the company and its processes
3. Is so complex that many companies cannot
adjust to it
4. Involves an ongoing, possibly never
completed, process for implementation
5. Expertise is limited with ongoing staffing
problems
14 - 89© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
ERP in the Service Sector
 ERP systems have been developed
for health care, government, retail
stores, hotels, and financial
services
 Also called efficient consumer
response (ECR) systems
 Objective is to tie sales to buying,
inventory, logistics, and production
14 - 90© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,
recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Printed in the United States of America.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Heizer om10 ch01
Heizer om10 ch01Heizer om10 ch01
Heizer om10 ch01mkirtapm
 
50 Ways To Drive ERP Systems To Success
50 Ways To Drive ERP Systems To Success50 Ways To Drive ERP Systems To Success
50 Ways To Drive ERP Systems To SuccessKirsean Consulting FZE
 
Top 6 Factors for ERP Success
Top 6 Factors for ERP SuccessTop 6 Factors for ERP Success
Top 6 Factors for ERP SuccessCasey Cramer
 
Chapter 01 operations_and_productivity
Chapter 01 operations_and_productivityChapter 01 operations_and_productivity
Chapter 01 operations_and_productivityNên Trần Ngọc
 
A Successful ERP Implementation in an Ethiopian Company
A Successful ERP Implementation in an Ethiopian CompanyA Successful ERP Implementation in an Ethiopian Company
A Successful ERP Implementation in an Ethiopian CompanyMayuree Srikulwong
 
ERP Project: Implementation Failure in HP
ERP Project: Implementation Failure in HPERP Project: Implementation Failure in HP
ERP Project: Implementation Failure in HPGunjan Kalita
 
Erp in cadbury
Erp in cadburyErp in cadbury
Erp in cadburyaman963
 
Erp Failure In Hershey’s
Erp Failure In Hershey’sErp Failure In Hershey’s
Erp Failure In Hershey’sAnkit Malhotra
 
ERP Business Case Study
ERP Business Case StudyERP Business Case Study
ERP Business Case StudyHari kumar
 
A study on issues related to implementation of an Enterprise Resource Plannin...
A study on issues related to implementation of an Enterprise Resource Plannin...A study on issues related to implementation of an Enterprise Resource Plannin...
A study on issues related to implementation of an Enterprise Resource Plannin...Rishi vyas
 
ERP Implementation Failure Case Study
ERP Implementation Failure Case StudyERP Implementation Failure Case Study
ERP Implementation Failure Case StudyYuvraj Zala
 
Erp failure- Implementation Failure Hershey Foods Corporation
Erp failure- Implementation Failure Hershey Foods CorporationErp failure- Implementation Failure Hershey Foods Corporation
Erp failure- Implementation Failure Hershey Foods CorporationParth Purohit
 
Ajay Roy 2016
Ajay Roy 2016Ajay Roy 2016
Ajay Roy 2016ajay ajay
 

Was ist angesagt? (19)

Heizer om10 ch01
Heizer om10 ch01Heizer om10 ch01
Heizer om10 ch01
 
Chopra scm5 ch03_ge
Chopra scm5 ch03_geChopra scm5 ch03_ge
Chopra scm5 ch03_ge
 
50 Ways To Drive ERP Systems To Success
50 Ways To Drive ERP Systems To Success50 Ways To Drive ERP Systems To Success
50 Ways To Drive ERP Systems To Success
 
Chapter 09 layout_strategies
Chapter 09 layout_strategiesChapter 09 layout_strategies
Chapter 09 layout_strategies
 
Top 6 Factors for ERP Success
Top 6 Factors for ERP SuccessTop 6 Factors for ERP Success
Top 6 Factors for ERP Success
 
Chapter 01 operations_and_productivity
Chapter 01 operations_and_productivityChapter 01 operations_and_productivity
Chapter 01 operations_and_productivity
 
Chopra scm5 ch04_ge
Chopra scm5 ch04_geChopra scm5 ch04_ge
Chopra scm5 ch04_ge
 
A Successful ERP Implementation in an Ethiopian Company
A Successful ERP Implementation in an Ethiopian CompanyA Successful ERP Implementation in an Ethiopian Company
A Successful ERP Implementation in an Ethiopian Company
 
ERP Project: Implementation Failure in HP
ERP Project: Implementation Failure in HPERP Project: Implementation Failure in HP
ERP Project: Implementation Failure in HP
 
Erp case study
Erp case studyErp case study
Erp case study
 
Erp in cadbury
Erp in cadburyErp in cadbury
Erp in cadbury
 
Erp Failure In Hershey’s
Erp Failure In Hershey’sErp Failure In Hershey’s
Erp Failure In Hershey’s
 
ERP Business Case Study
ERP Business Case StudyERP Business Case Study
ERP Business Case Study
 
A study on issues related to implementation of an Enterprise Resource Plannin...
A study on issues related to implementation of an Enterprise Resource Plannin...A study on issues related to implementation of an Enterprise Resource Plannin...
A study on issues related to implementation of an Enterprise Resource Plannin...
 
ERP Implementation Failure Case Study
ERP Implementation Failure Case StudyERP Implementation Failure Case Study
ERP Implementation Failure Case Study
 
Erp failure- Implementation Failure Hershey Foods Corporation
Erp failure- Implementation Failure Hershey Foods CorporationErp failure- Implementation Failure Hershey Foods Corporation
Erp failure- Implementation Failure Hershey Foods Corporation
 
Ajay Roy 2016
Ajay Roy 2016Ajay Roy 2016
Ajay Roy 2016
 
Chopra scm5 ch02_ge
Chopra scm5 ch02_geChopra scm5 ch02_ge
Chopra scm5 ch02_ge
 
Eleinko Resume 2016
Eleinko Resume 2016Eleinko Resume 2016
Eleinko Resume 2016
 

Andere mochten auch

heizer jay operations management Ch14pp
 heizer jay operations management Ch14pp heizer jay operations management Ch14pp
heizer jay operations management Ch14ppTaliya Hemanth
 
Stevenson9e Ch04
Stevenson9e Ch04Stevenson9e Ch04
Stevenson9e Ch04ajithsrc
 
heizer jay operations management Ch07pp
heizer jay operations management Ch07ppheizer jay operations management Ch07pp
heizer jay operations management Ch07ppTaliya Hemanth
 
241233316 solution-manual-of-chapter-8-om
241233316 solution-manual-of-chapter-8-om241233316 solution-manual-of-chapter-8-om
241233316 solution-manual-of-chapter-8-omHashem Yahya Almahdi
 
Chopra3 ppt ch14
Chopra3 ppt ch14Chopra3 ppt ch14
Chopra3 ppt ch14karukone
 
172385052 solution-manual-operation-management-ch-17-pdf
172385052 solution-manual-operation-management-ch-17-pdf172385052 solution-manual-operation-management-ch-17-pdf
172385052 solution-manual-operation-management-ch-17-pdfHashem Yahya Almahdi
 

Andere mochten auch (10)

heizer jay operations management Ch14pp
 heizer jay operations management Ch14pp heizer jay operations management Ch14pp
heizer jay operations management Ch14pp
 
Heizer 14
Heizer 14Heizer 14
Heizer 14
 
Heizer om10 ch14-mrp
Heizer om10 ch14-mrpHeizer om10 ch14-mrp
Heizer om10 ch14-mrp
 
Stevenson9e Ch04
Stevenson9e Ch04Stevenson9e Ch04
Stevenson9e Ch04
 
heizer jay operations management Ch07pp
heizer jay operations management Ch07ppheizer jay operations management Ch07pp
heizer jay operations management Ch07pp
 
241233316 solution-manual-of-chapter-8-om
241233316 solution-manual-of-chapter-8-om241233316 solution-manual-of-chapter-8-om
241233316 solution-manual-of-chapter-8-om
 
Heizer 14
Heizer 14Heizer 14
Heizer 14
 
Chopra3 ppt ch14
Chopra3 ppt ch14Chopra3 ppt ch14
Chopra3 ppt ch14
 
172385052 solution-manual-operation-management-ch-17-pdf
172385052 solution-manual-operation-management-ch-17-pdf172385052 solution-manual-operation-management-ch-17-pdf
172385052 solution-manual-operation-management-ch-17-pdf
 
Heizer 01
Heizer 01Heizer 01
Heizer 01
 

Ähnlich wie Heizer om10 ch14

Heizer om10 ch14
Heizer om10 ch14Heizer om10 ch14
Heizer om10 ch14remilaw
 
CHP-10--Resource-Planning--17102022-010714pm (1).ppt
CHP-10--Resource-Planning--17102022-010714pm (1).pptCHP-10--Resource-Planning--17102022-010714pm (1).ppt
CHP-10--Resource-Planning--17102022-010714pm (1).pptTalhaMoosani
 
Heizer om10 ch13
Heizer om10 ch13Heizer om10 ch13
Heizer om10 ch13ryaekle
 
Heizer om10 ch01
Heizer om10 ch01Heizer om10 ch01
Heizer om10 ch01ryaekle
 
Technology and Operation Management_CHP1.pdf
Technology and Operation Management_CHP1.pdfTechnology and Operation Management_CHP1.pdf
Technology and Operation Management_CHP1.pdfmeilanipelu1
 
Chapter 1 introduction
Chapter 1 introductionChapter 1 introduction
Chapter 1 introductionSachin Modgil
 
Heizer om10 ch05
Heizer om10 ch05Heizer om10 ch05
Heizer om10 ch05ryaekle
 
heizer_om12_ch014 final (1).pptx
heizer_om12_ch014 final (1).pptxheizer_om12_ch014 final (1).pptx
heizer_om12_ch014 final (1).pptxkikikikiyowooo
 
Heizer om10 ch07
Heizer om10 ch07Heizer om10 ch07
Heizer om10 ch07ryaekle
 
Lecture 12_Enterprise Resourse Planning.pdf
Lecture 12_Enterprise Resourse Planning.pdfLecture 12_Enterprise Resourse Planning.pdf
Lecture 12_Enterprise Resourse Planning.pdfMaiLinh301193
 
Chapter 4, Job Analysis.ppt
Chapter 4, Job Analysis.pptChapter 4, Job Analysis.ppt
Chapter 4, Job Analysis.pptFaizanGul6
 
1 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.Operations and .docx
1 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.Operations and .docx1 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.Operations and .docx
1 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.Operations and .docxjeremylockett77
 
week 1 operation & productivity.ppt
week 1 operation & productivity.pptweek 1 operation & productivity.ppt
week 1 operation & productivity.pptdevina81
 
11Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain Cycle Invento
11Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain Cycle Invento11Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain Cycle Invento
11Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain Cycle InventoSantosConleyha
 
11Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain Cycle Invento
11Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain Cycle Invento11Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain Cycle Invento
11Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain Cycle InventoBenitoSumpter862
 
Inventory control (management)
Inventory control (management)Inventory control (management)
Inventory control (management)Manthan Chavda
 

Ähnlich wie Heizer om10 ch14 (20)

Heizer om10 ch14
Heizer om10 ch14Heizer om10 ch14
Heizer om10 ch14
 
CHP-10--Resource-Planning--17102022-010714pm (1).ppt
CHP-10--Resource-Planning--17102022-010714pm (1).pptCHP-10--Resource-Planning--17102022-010714pm (1).ppt
CHP-10--Resource-Planning--17102022-010714pm (1).ppt
 
Heizer om10 ch13
Heizer om10 ch13Heizer om10 ch13
Heizer om10 ch13
 
heizer_om10_ch01.ppt
heizer_om10_ch01.pptheizer_om10_ch01.ppt
heizer_om10_ch01.ppt
 
Heizer om10 ch01
Heizer om10 ch01Heizer om10 ch01
Heizer om10 ch01
 
Technology and Operation Management_CHP1.pdf
Technology and Operation Management_CHP1.pdfTechnology and Operation Management_CHP1.pdf
Technology and Operation Management_CHP1.pdf
 
heizer_om10_ch01.ppt
heizer_om10_ch01.pptheizer_om10_ch01.ppt
heizer_om10_ch01.ppt
 
Chapter 1 introduction
Chapter 1 introductionChapter 1 introduction
Chapter 1 introduction
 
Heizer om10 ch05
Heizer om10 ch05Heizer om10 ch05
Heizer om10 ch05
 
Sales Operations
Sales OperationsSales Operations
Sales Operations
 
heizer_om12_ch014 final (1).pptx
heizer_om12_ch014 final (1).pptxheizer_om12_ch014 final (1).pptx
heizer_om12_ch014 final (1).pptx
 
Heizer om10 ch07
Heizer om10 ch07Heizer om10 ch07
Heizer om10 ch07
 
Lecture 12_Enterprise Resourse Planning.pdf
Lecture 12_Enterprise Resourse Planning.pdfLecture 12_Enterprise Resourse Planning.pdf
Lecture 12_Enterprise Resourse Planning.pdf
 
Chapter 4, Job Analysis.ppt
Chapter 4, Job Analysis.pptChapter 4, Job Analysis.ppt
Chapter 4, Job Analysis.ppt
 
1 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.Operations and .docx
1 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.Operations and .docx1 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.Operations and .docx
1 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.Operations and .docx
 
fahad om
fahad omfahad om
fahad om
 
week 1 operation & productivity.ppt
week 1 operation & productivity.pptweek 1 operation & productivity.ppt
week 1 operation & productivity.ppt
 
11Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain Cycle Invento
11Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain Cycle Invento11Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain Cycle Invento
11Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain Cycle Invento
 
11Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain Cycle Invento
11Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain Cycle Invento11Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain Cycle Invento
11Managing Economies of Scale in a Supply Chain Cycle Invento
 
Inventory control (management)
Inventory control (management)Inventory control (management)
Inventory control (management)
 

Mehr von ryaekle

Bad410 business law
Bad410 business lawBad410 business law
Bad410 business lawryaekle
 
Meet your professor
Meet your professorMeet your professor
Meet your professorryaekle
 
Human resources assignment
Human resources assignmentHuman resources assignment
Human resources assignmentryaekle
 
Bad360 operations management online
Bad360 operations management onlineBad360 operations management online
Bad360 operations management onlineryaekle
 
Heizer om10 mod_f
Heizer om10 mod_fHeizer om10 mod_f
Heizer om10 mod_fryaekle
 
Heizer om10 mod_e
Heizer om10 mod_eHeizer om10 mod_e
Heizer om10 mod_eryaekle
 
Heizer om10 mod_d
Heizer om10 mod_dHeizer om10 mod_d
Heizer om10 mod_dryaekle
 
Heizer om10 mod_c
Heizer om10 mod_cHeizer om10 mod_c
Heizer om10 mod_cryaekle
 
Heizer om10 mod_b
Heizer om10 mod_bHeizer om10 mod_b
Heizer om10 mod_bryaekle
 
Heizer om10 mod_a
Heizer om10 mod_aHeizer om10 mod_a
Heizer om10 mod_aryaekle
 
Heizer om10 ch08
Heizer om10 ch08Heizer om10 ch08
Heizer om10 ch08ryaekle
 
p305_pp12
p305_pp12p305_pp12
p305_pp12ryaekle
 
p305_pp11
p305_pp11p305_pp11
p305_pp11ryaekle
 
p305_pp10
p305_pp10p305_pp10
p305_pp10ryaekle
 
0132886391 pp09
0132886391 pp090132886391 pp09
0132886391 pp09ryaekle
 
p305_pp08
p305_pp08p305_pp08
p305_pp08ryaekle
 
p305_pp07
p305_pp07p305_pp07
p305_pp07ryaekle
 
p305_pp06
p305_pp06p305_pp06
p305_pp06ryaekle
 
p305_pp05
p305_pp05p305_pp05
p305_pp05ryaekle
 

Mehr von ryaekle (19)

Bad410 business law
Bad410 business lawBad410 business law
Bad410 business law
 
Meet your professor
Meet your professorMeet your professor
Meet your professor
 
Human resources assignment
Human resources assignmentHuman resources assignment
Human resources assignment
 
Bad360 operations management online
Bad360 operations management onlineBad360 operations management online
Bad360 operations management online
 
Heizer om10 mod_f
Heizer om10 mod_fHeizer om10 mod_f
Heizer om10 mod_f
 
Heizer om10 mod_e
Heizer om10 mod_eHeizer om10 mod_e
Heizer om10 mod_e
 
Heizer om10 mod_d
Heizer om10 mod_dHeizer om10 mod_d
Heizer om10 mod_d
 
Heizer om10 mod_c
Heizer om10 mod_cHeizer om10 mod_c
Heizer om10 mod_c
 
Heizer om10 mod_b
Heizer om10 mod_bHeizer om10 mod_b
Heizer om10 mod_b
 
Heizer om10 mod_a
Heizer om10 mod_aHeizer om10 mod_a
Heizer om10 mod_a
 
Heizer om10 ch08
Heizer om10 ch08Heizer om10 ch08
Heizer om10 ch08
 
p305_pp12
p305_pp12p305_pp12
p305_pp12
 
p305_pp11
p305_pp11p305_pp11
p305_pp11
 
p305_pp10
p305_pp10p305_pp10
p305_pp10
 
0132886391 pp09
0132886391 pp090132886391 pp09
0132886391 pp09
 
p305_pp08
p305_pp08p305_pp08
p305_pp08
 
p305_pp07
p305_pp07p305_pp07
p305_pp07
 
p305_pp06
p305_pp06p305_pp06
p305_pp06
 
p305_pp05
p305_pp05p305_pp05
p305_pp05
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Slack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 SlidesSlack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 Slidespraypatel2
 
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with NanonetsHow to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonetsnaman860154
 
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Allon Mureinik
 
Kalyanpur ) Call Girls in Lucknow Finest Escorts Service 🍸 8923113531 🎰 Avail...
Kalyanpur ) Call Girls in Lucknow Finest Escorts Service 🍸 8923113531 🎰 Avail...Kalyanpur ) Call Girls in Lucknow Finest Escorts Service 🍸 8923113531 🎰 Avail...
Kalyanpur ) Call Girls in Lucknow Finest Escorts Service 🍸 8923113531 🎰 Avail...gurkirankumar98700
 
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptxHampshireHUG
 
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of ServiceCNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Servicegiselly40
 
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 3652toLead Limited
 
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘
🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘RTylerCroy
 
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024Results
 
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptx
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptxThe Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptx
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptxMalak Abu Hammad
 
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationScaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationRadu Cotescu
 
Boost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivity
Boost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivityBoost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivity
Boost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivityPrincipled Technologies
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking MenDelhi Call girls
 
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...shyamraj55
 
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationMy Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationRidwan Fadjar
 
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...Igalia
 
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024Scott Keck-Warren
 
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreterPresentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreternaman860154
 
Maximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptx
Maximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptxMaximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptx
Maximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptxOnBoard
 
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024Rafal Los
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Slack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 SlidesSlack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 Slides
 
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with NanonetsHow to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
 
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
 
Kalyanpur ) Call Girls in Lucknow Finest Escorts Service 🍸 8923113531 🎰 Avail...
Kalyanpur ) Call Girls in Lucknow Finest Escorts Service 🍸 8923113531 🎰 Avail...Kalyanpur ) Call Girls in Lucknow Finest Escorts Service 🍸 8923113531 🎰 Avail...
Kalyanpur ) Call Girls in Lucknow Finest Escorts Service 🍸 8923113531 🎰 Avail...
 
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
 
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of ServiceCNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
 
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
 
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘
🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘
 
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024
 
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptx
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptxThe Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptx
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptx
 
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationScaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
 
Boost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivity
Boost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivityBoost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivity
Boost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivity
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
 
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
 
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationMy Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
 
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
 
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
 
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreterPresentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
 
Maximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptx
Maximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptxMaximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptx
Maximizing Board Effectiveness 2024 Webinar.pptx
 
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
 

Heizer om10 ch14

  • 1. 14 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 14 Material Requirements Planning (MRP) and ERP PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and Render Operations Management, 10e Principles of Operations Management, 8e PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl
  • 2. 14 - 2© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Outline  Global Company Profile: Wheeled Coach  Dependent Demand  Dependent Inventory Model Requirements  Master Production Schedule  Bills of Material  Accurate Inventory Records  Purchase Orders Outstanding  Lead Times for Components
  • 3. 14 - 3© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Outline – Continued  MRP Structure  MRP Management  MRP Dynamics  MRP and JIT  Lot-Sizing Techniques
  • 4. 14 - 4© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Outline – Continued  Extensions of MRP  Material Requirements Planning II (MRP II)  Closed-Loop MRP  Capacity Planning  MRP In Services  Distribution Resource Planning (DRP)
  • 5. 14 - 5© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Outline – Continued  Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)  Advantages and Disadvantages of ERP Systems  ERP in the Service Sector
  • 6. 14 - 6© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Learning Objectives When you complete this chapter you should be able to: 1. Develop a product structure 2. Build a gross requirements plan 3. Build a net requirements plan 4. Determine lot sizes for lot-for-lot, EOQ, and PPB
  • 7. 14 - 7© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Learning Objectives When you complete this chapter you should be able to: 5. Describe MRP II 6. Describe closed-loop MRP 7. Describe ERP
  • 8. 14 - 8© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Wheeled Coach  Largest manufacturer of ambulances in the world  International competitor  12 major ambulance designs  18,000 different inventory items  6,000 manufactured parts  12,000 purchased parts
  • 9. 14 - 9© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Wheeled Coach  Four Key Tasks  Material plan must meet both the requirements of the master schedule and the capabilities of the production facility  Plan must be executed as designed  Minimize inventory investment  Maintain excellent record integrity
  • 10. 14 - 10© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Dependent Demand For any product for which a schedule can be established, dependent demand techniques should be used
  • 11. 14 - 11© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Dependent Demand Benefits of MRP 1. Better response to customer orders 2. Faster response to market changes 3. Improved utilization of facilities and labor 4. Reduced inventory levels
  • 12. 14 - 12© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Dependent Demand  The demand for one item is related to the demand for another item  Given a quantity for the end item, the demand for all parts and components can be calculated  In general, used whenever a schedule can be established for an item  MRP is the common technique
  • 13. 14 - 13© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Dependent Demand 1. Master production schedule 2. Specifications or bill of material 3. Inventory availability 4. Purchase orders outstanding 5. Lead times Effective use of dependent demand inventory models requires the following
  • 14. 14 - 14© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Master Production Schedule (MPS)  Specifies what is to be made and when  Must be in accordance with the aggregate production plan  Inputs from financial plans, customer demand, engineering, supplier performance  As the process moves from planning to execution, each step must be tested for feasibility  The MPS is the result of the production planning process
  • 15. 14 - 15© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Master Production Schedule (MPS)  MPS is established in terms of specific products  Schedule must be followed for a reasonable length of time  The MPS is quite often fixed or frozen in the near term part of the plan  The MPS is a rolling schedule  The MPS is a statement of what is to be produced, not a forecast of demand
  • 16. 14 - 16© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Figure 14.1 Change production plan?Master production schedule Management Return on investment Capital Engineering Design completion Aggregate production plan Procurement Supplier performance Human resources Manpower planning Production Capacity Inventory Marketing Customer demand Finance Cash flow The Planning Process
  • 17. 14 - 17© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall The Planning Process Figure 14.1 Is capacity plan being met? Is execution meeting the plan? Change master production schedule? Change capacity? Change requirements? No Execute material plans Execute capacity plans Yes Realistic? Capacity requirements plan Material requirements plan Master production schedule
  • 18. 14 - 18© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Aggregate Production Plan Months January February Aggregate Production Plan 1,500 1,200 (Shows the total quantity of amplifiers) Weeks 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Master Production Schedule (Shows the specific type and quantity of amplifier to be produced 240-watt amplifier 100 100 100 100 150-watt amplifier 500 500 450 450 75-watt amplifier 300 100 Figure 14.2
  • 19. 14 - 19© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Master Production Schedule (MPS) 1. A customer order in a job shop (make- to-order) company 2. Modules in a repetitive (assemble-to- order or forecast) company 3. An end item in a continuous (stock-to- forecast) company Can be expressed in any of the following terms:
  • 20. 14 - 20© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Focus for Different Process Strategies Stock to Forecast (Product Focus) Schedule finished product Assemble to Order or Forecast (Repetitive) Schedule modules Make to Order (Process Focus) Schedule orders Examples: Print shop Motorcycles Steel, Beer, Bread Machine shop Autos, TVs Lightbulbs Fine-dining restaurant Fast-food restaurant Paper Typical focus of the master production schedule Number of inputs Number of end items Figure 14.3
  • 21. 14 - 21© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall MPS Examples Gross Requirements for Crabmeat Quiche Gross Requirements for Spinach Quiche Day 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 and so on Amount 50 100 47 60 110 75 Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 and so on Amount 100 200 150 60 75 100 Table 14.1 For Nancy’s Specialty Foods
  • 22. 14 - 22© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Bills of Material  List of components, ingredients, and materials needed to make product  Provides product structure  Items above given level are called parents  Items below given level are called children
  • 23. 14 - 23© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall BOM Example B(2) Std. 12” Speaker kit C(3) Std. 12” Speaker kit w/ amp-booster1 E(2)E(2) F(2) Packing box and installation kit of wire, bolts, and screws Std. 12” Speaker booster assembly 2 D(2) 12” Speaker D(2) 12” Speaker G(1) Amp-booster 3 Product structure for “Awesome” (A) A Level 0
  • 24. 14 - 24© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall BOM Example B(2) Std. 12” Speaker kit C(3) Std. 12” Speaker kit w/ amp-booster1 E(2)E(2) F(2) Packing box and installation kit of wire, bolts, and screws Std. 12” Speaker booster assembly 2 D(2) 12” Speaker D(2) 12” Speaker G(1) Amp-booster 3 Product structure for “Awesome” (A) A Level 0 Part B: 2 x number of As = (2)(50) = 100 Part C: 3 x number of As = (3)(50) = 150 Part D: 2 x number of Bs + 2 x number of Fs = (2)(100) + (2)(300) = 800 Part E: 2 x number of Bs + 2 x number of Cs = (2)(100) + (2)(150) = 500 Part F: 2 x number of Cs = (2)(150) = 300 Part G: 1 x number of Fs = (1)(300) = 300
  • 25. 14 - 25© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Bills of Material  Modular Bills  Modules are not final products but components that can be assembled into multiple end items  Can significantly simplify planning and scheduling
  • 26. 14 - 26© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Bills of Material  Planning Bills  Also called “pseudo” or super bills  Created to assign an artificial parent to the BOM  Used to group subassemblies to reduce the number of items planned and scheduled  Used to create standard “kits” for production
  • 27. 14 - 27© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Bills of Material  Phantom Bills Describe subassemblies that exist only temporarily Are part of another assembly and never go into inventory  Low-Level Coding Item is coded at the lowest level at which it occurs BOMs are processed one level at a time
  • 28. 14 - 28© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Accurate Records  Accurate inventory records are absolutely required for MRP (or any dependent demand system) to operate correctly  Generally MRP systems require more than 99% accuracy  Outstanding purchase orders must accurately reflect quantities and scheduled receipts
  • 29. 14 - 29© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Lead Times  The time required to purchase, produce, or assemble an item  For production – the sum of the order, wait, move, setup, store, and run times  For purchased items – the time between the recognition of a need and the availability of the item for production
  • 30. 14 - 30© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Time-Phased Product Structure | | | | | | | | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Time in weeks F 2 weeks 3 weeks 1 week A 2 weeks 1 week D E 2 weeks D G 1 week Start production of D Must have D and E completed here so production can begin on B Figure 14.4 1 week 2 weeks to produce B C E
  • 31. 14 - 31© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall MRP Structure Figure 14.5 Output Reports MRP by period report MRP by date report Planned order report Purchase advice Exception reports Order early or late or not needed Order quantity too small or too large Data Files Purchasing data BOM Lead times (Item master file) Inventory data Master production schedule Material requirement planning programs (computer and software)
  • 32. 14 - 32© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Determining Gross Requirements  Starts with a production schedule for the end item – 50 units of Item A in week 8  Using the lead time for the item, determine the week in which the order should be released – a 1 week lead time means the order for 50 units should be released in week 7  This step is often called “lead time offset” or “time phasing”
  • 33. 14 - 33© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Determining Gross Requirements  From the BOM, every Item A requires 2 Item Bs – 100 Item Bs are required in week 7 to satisfy the order release for Item A  The lead time for the Item B is 2 weeks – release an order for 100 units of Item B in week 5  The timing and quantity for component requirements are determined by the order release of the parent(s)
  • 34. 14 - 34© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Determining Gross Requirements  The process continues through the entire BOM one level at a time – often called “explosion”  By processing the BOM by level, items with multiple parents are only processed once, saving time and resources and reducing confusion  Low-level coding ensures that each item appears at only one level in the BOM
  • 35. 14 - 35© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Gross Requirements Plan Table 14.3 Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Lead Time A. Required date 50 Order release date 50 1 week B. Required date 100 Order release date 100 2 weeks C. Required date 150 Order release date 150 1 week E. Required date 200 300 Order release date 200 300 2 weeks F. Required date 300 Order release date 300 3 weeks D. Required date 600 200 Order release date 600 200 1 week G. Required date 300 Order release date 300 2 weeks
  • 36. 14 - 36© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Net Requirements Plan
  • 37. 14 - 37© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Net Requirements Plan
  • 38. 14 - 38© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Determining Net Requirements  Starts with a production schedule for the end item – 50 units of Item A in week 8  Because there are 10 Item As on hand, only 40 are actually required – (net requirement) = (gross requirement - on- hand inventory)  The planned order receipt for Item A in week 8 is 40 units – 40 = 50 - 10
  • 39. 14 - 39© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Determining Net Requirements  Following the lead time offset procedure, the planned order release for Item A is now 40 units in week 7  The gross requirement for Item B is now 80 units in week 7  There are 15 units of Item B on hand, so the net requirement is 65 units in week 7  A planned order receipt of 65 units in week 7 generates a planned order release of 65 units in week 5
  • 40. 14 - 40© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Determining Net Requirements  A planned order receipt of 65 units in week 7 generates a planned order release of 65 units in week 5  The on-hand inventory record for Item B is updated to reflect the use of the 15 items in inventory and shows no on-hand inventory in week 8  This is referred to as the Gross-to-Net calculation and is the third basic function of the MRP process
  • 41. 14 - 41© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall S B C 12 138 9 10 11 20 3040 Lead time = 6 for S Master schedule for S Gross Requirements Schedule Figure 14.6 1 2 3 10 10 Master schedule for B sold directly Periods Therefore, these are the gross requirements for B Gross requirements: B 10 40 50 2040+10 15+30 =50 =45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Periods A B C Lead time = 4 for A Master schedule for A 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 40 1550
  • 42. 14 - 42© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Net Requirements Plan The logic of net requirements Available inventory Net requirements On hand Scheduled receipts+– = Total requirements Gross requirements Allocations+
  • 43. 14 - 43© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall MRP Planning Sheet Figure 14.7
  • 44. 14 - 44© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Safety Stock  BOMs, inventory records, purchase and production quantities may not be perfect  Consideration of safety stock may be prudent  Should be minimized and ultimately eliminated  Typically built into projected on-hand inventory
  • 45. 14 - 45© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall MRP Management  MRP is a dynamic system  Facilitates replanning when changes occur  Regenerating  Net change  System nervousness can result from too many changes  Time fences put limits on replanning  Pegging links each item to its parent allowing effective analysis of changes
  • 46. 14 - 46© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall MRP and JIT  MRP is a planning system that does not do detailed scheduling  MRP requires fixed lead times which might actually vary with batch size  JIT excels at rapidly moving small batches of material through the system
  • 47. 14 - 47© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Finite Capacity Scheduling  MRP systems do not consider capacity during normal planning cycles  Finite capacity scheduling (FCS) recognizes actual capacity limits  By merging MRP and FCS, a finite schedule is created with feasible capacities which facilitates rapid material movement
  • 48. 14 - 48© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Small Bucket Approach 1. MRP “buckets” are reduced to daily or hourly 2. Planned receipts are used internally to sequence production 3. Inventory is moved through the plant on a JIT basis 4. Completed products are moved to finished goods inventory which reduces required quantities for subsequent planned orders 5. Back flushing based on the BOM is used to deduct inventory that was used in production
  • 49. 14 - 49© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Balanced Flow  Used in repetitive operations  MRP plans are executed using JIT techniques based on “pull” principles  Flows are carefully balanced with small lot sizes
  • 50. 14 - 50© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Supermarket  Items used by many products are held in a common area often called a supermarket  Items are withdrawn as needed  Inventory is maintained using JIT systems and procedures  Common items are not planned by the MRP system
  • 51. 14 - 51© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Lot-Sizing Techniques  Lot-for-lot techniques order just what is required for production based on net requirements  May not always be feasible  If setup costs are high, lot-for-lot can be expensive  Economic order quantity (EOQ)  EOQ expects a known constant demand and MRP systems often deal with unknown and variable demand
  • 52. 14 - 52© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Lot-Sizing Techniques  Part Period Balancing (PPB) looks at future orders to determine most economic lot size  The Wagner-Whitin algorithm is a complex dynamic programming technique  Assumes a finite time horizon  Effective, but computationally burdensome
  • 53. 14 - 53© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Lot-for-Lot Example 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Gross requirements 35 30 40 0 10 40 30 0 30 55 Scheduled receipts Projected on hand 35 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Net requirements 0 30 40 0 10 40 30 0 30 55 Planned order receipts 30 40 10 40 30 30 55 Planned order releases 30 40 10 40 30 30 55 Holding cost = $1/week; Setup cost = $100; Lead time = 1 week
  • 54. 14 - 54© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Lot-for-Lot Example 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Gross requirements 35 30 40 0 10 40 30 0 30 55 Scheduled receipts Projected on hand 35 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Net requirements 0 30 40 0 10 40 30 0 30 55 Planned order receipts 30 40 10 40 30 30 55 Planned order releases 30 40 10 40 30 30 55 Holding cost = $1/week; Setup cost = $100; Lead time = 1 week No on-hand inventory is carried through the system Total holding cost = $0 There are seven setups for this item in this plan Total ordering cost = 7 x $100 = $700
  • 55. 14 - 55© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall EOQ Lot Size Example 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Gross requirements 35 30 40 0 10 40 30 0 30 55 Scheduled receipts Projected on hand 35 35 0 43 3 3 66 26 69 69 39 Net requirements 0 30 0 0 7 0 4 0 0 16 Planned order receipts 73 73 73 73 Planned order releases 73 73 73 73 Holding cost = $1/week; Setup cost = $100; Lead time = 1 week Average weekly gross requirements = 27; EOQ = 73 units
  • 56. 14 - 56© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall EOQ Lot Size Example 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Gross requirements 35 30 40 0 10 40 30 0 30 55 Scheduled receipts Projected on hand 35 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Net requirements 0 30 0 0 7 0 4 0 0 16 Planned order receipts 73 73 73 73 Planned order releases 73 73 73 73 Holding cost = $1/week; Setup cost = $100; Lead time = 1 week Average weekly gross requirements = 27; EOQ = 73 units Annual demand = 1,404 Total cost = setup cost + holding cost Total cost = (1,404/73) x $100 + (73/2) x ($1 x 52 weeks) Total cost = $3,798 Cost for 10 weeks = $3,798 x (10 weeks/52 weeks) = $730
  • 57. 14 - 57© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall PPB Example 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Gross requirements 35 30 40 0 10 40 30 0 30 55 Scheduled receipts Projected on hand 35 Net requirements Planned order receipts Planned order releases Holding cost = $1/week; Setup cost = $100; Lead time = 1 week EPP = 100 units
  • 58. 14 - 58© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall PPB Example 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Gross requirements 35 30 40 0 10 40 30 0 30 55 Scheduled receipts Projected on hand 35 Net requirements Planned order receipts Planned order releases Holding cost = $1/week; Setup cost = $100; EPP = 100 units 2 30 0 2, 3 70 40 = 40 x 1 2, 3, 4 70 40 2, 3, 4, 5 80 70 = 40 x 1 + 10 x 3 100 70 170 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 120 230 = 40 x 1 + 10 x 3 + 40 x 4 + = Combine periods 2 - 5 as this results in the Part Period closest to the EPP Combine periods 6 - 9 as this results in the Part Period closest to the EPP 6 40 0 6, 7 70 30 = 30 x 1 6, 7, 8 70 30 = 30 x 1 + 0 x 2 6, 7, 8, 9 100 120 = 30 x 1 + 30 x 3 100 120 220+ = 10 55 0 100 0 100 Total cost 300 190 490 + = + = Trial Lot Size Periods (cumulative net Costs Combined requirements) Part Periods Setup Holding Total
  • 59. 14 - 59© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall PPB Example 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Gross requirements 35 30 40 0 10 40 30 0 30 55 Scheduled receipts Projected on hand 35 35 0 50 10 10 0 60 30 30 0 Net requirements 0 30 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 55 Planned order receipts 80 100 55 Planned order releases 80 100 55 Holding cost = $1/week; Setup cost = $100; Lead time = 1 week EPP = 100 units
  • 60. 14 - 60© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Lot-Sizing Summary For these three examples Lot-for-lot $700 EOQ $730 PPB $490
  • 61. 14 - 61© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Lot-Sizing Summary  In theory, lot sizes should be recomputed whenever there is a lot size or order quantity change  In practice, this results in system nervousness and instability  Lot-for-lot should be used when low-cost JIT can be achieved
  • 62. 14 - 62© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Lot-Sizing Summary  Lot sizes can be modified to allow for scrap, process constraints, and purchase lots  Use lot-sizing with care as it can cause considerable distortion of requirements at lower levels of the BOM  When setup costs are significant and demand is reasonably smooth, PPB, Wagner-Whitin, or EOQ should give reasonable results
  • 63. 14 - 63© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Extensions of MRP  MRP II  Closed-Loop MRP  MRP system provides input to the capacity plan, MPS, and production planning process  Capacity Planning  MRP system generates a load report which details capacity requirements  This is used to drive the capacity planning process  Changes pass back through the MRP system for rescheduling
  • 64. 14 - 64© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Material Requirements Planning II  Requirement data can be enriched by other resources  Generally called MRP II or Material Resource Planning  Outputs include  Scrap  Packaging waste  Carbon emissions  Data used by purchasing, production scheduling, capacity planning, inventory
  • 65. 14 - 65© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Material Resource Planning Weeks LT 5 6 7 8 Computer 1 100 Labor Hrs: .2 each 20 Machine Hrs: .2 each 20 Scrap: 1 ounce fiberglass each 6.25 lbs Payables: $0 each $0 PC Board (1 each) 2 100 Labor Hrs: .15 each 15 Machine Hrs: .1 each 10 Scrap: .5 ounces copper each 3.125 lb Payables: raw material at $5 each $500 Processor (5 each) 4 500 Labor Hrs: .2 each 100 Machine Hrs: .2 each 100 Scrap: .01 ounces of acid waste each 0.3125 lb Payables: processors at $10 each $5,000 Table 14.4
  • 66. 14 - 66© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Closed-Loop MRP System Figure 14.8 Priority Management Develop Master Production Schedule Prepare Materials Requirements Pan Detailed Production Activity Control (Shop Scheduling/Dispatching) Capacity Management Evaluate Resource Availability (Rough Cut) Determine Capacity Availability Implement Input/Output Control Aggregate Production Plan OK? NO OK? NO OK? YES OK? YES Planning Execution (in repetitive systems JIT techniques are used)
  • 67. 14 - 67© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Capacity Planning  Feedback from the MRP system  Load reports show resource requirements for work centers  Work can be moved between work centers to smooth the load or bring it within capacity
  • 68. 14 - 68© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Smoothing Tactics 1. Overlapping  Sends part of the work to following operations before the entire lot is complete  Reduces lead time 2. Operations splitting  Sends the lot to two different machines for the same operation  Shorter throughput time but increased setup costs 3. Order or lot splitting  Breaking up the order into smaller lots and running part earlier (or later) in the schedule
  • 69. 14 - 69© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Order Splitting  Develop a capacity plan for a work cell at Wiz Products  There are 12 hours available each day  Each order requires 1 hour Day 1 2 3 4 5 Orders 10 14 13 10 14
  • 70. 14 - 70© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Order Splitting Day Units Ordered Capacity Required (hours) Capacity Available (hours) Utilization: Over/ (Under) (hours) Production Planner’s Action New Production Schedule 1 10 10 12 (2) 12 2 14 14 12 2 Split order: move 2 units to day 1 12 3 13 13 12 1 Split order: move one unit to day 6 or request overtime 13 4 10 10 12 (2) 12 5 14 14 12 2 Split order: move 2 units to day 4 12 61
  • 71. 14 - 71© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Order Splitting Figure 14.9 Available capacity Capacity exceeded on days 2, 3, and 5 2 orders moved to day 1 from day 2 (a day early) 1 order forced to overtime or to day 6 2 orders moved to day 4 (a day early) 14 – 12 – 10 – 8 – 6 – 4 – 2 – 0 – 1 2 3 4 5 Days (b) Standardlabor-Hours 14 – 12 – 10 – 8 – 6 – 4 – 2 – 0 – 1 2 3 4 5 Days (a) Standardlabor-Hours
  • 72. 14 - 72© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall MRP in Services  Some services or service items are directly linked to demand for other services  These can be treated as dependent demand services or items  Restaurants  Hospitals  Hotels
  • 73. 14 - 73© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Uncooked linguini #30004 Sauce #30006 Veal #30005 MRP in Services Chef; Work Center #1 Helper one; Work Center #2 Asst. Chef; Work Center #3 Cooked linguini #20002 Spinach #20004 Prepared veal and sauce #20003 (a) PRODUCT STRUCTURE TREE Veal picante #10001 Figure 14.10
  • 74. 14 - 74© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall MRP in Services (b) BILL OF MATERIALS Part Number Description Quantity Unit of Measure Unit cost 10001 Veal picante 1 Serving — 20002 Cooked linguini 1 Serving — 20003 Prepared veal and sauce 1 Serving — 20004 Spinach 0.1 Bag 0.94 30004 Uncooked linguini 0.5 Pound — 30005 Veal 1 Serving 2.15 30006 Sauce 1 Serving 0.80
  • 75. 14 - 75© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall MRP in Services (c) BILL OF LABOR FOR VEAL PICANTE Labor Hours Work Center Operation Labor Type Setup Time Run Time 1 Assemble dish Chef .0069 .0041 2 Cook linguini Helper one .0005 .0022 3 Cook veal and sauce Assistant Chef .0125 .0500
  • 76. 14 - 76© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Distribution Resource Planning (DRP) Using dependent demand techniques through the supply chain  Expected demand or sales forecasts become gross requirements  Minimum levels of inventory to meet customer service levels  Accurate lead times  Definition of the distribution structure
  • 77. 14 - 77© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)  An extension of the MRP system to tie in customers and suppliers  Allows automation and integration of many business processes  Shares common data bases and business practices  Produces information in real time  Coordinates business from supplier evaluation to customer invoicing
  • 78. 14 - 78© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)  ERP modules include  Basic MRP  Finance  Human resources  Supply chain management (SCM)  Customer relationship management (CRM)
  • 79. 14 - 79© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall ERP and MRP Figure 14.11
  • 80. 14 - 80© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall ERP and MRP Figure 14.11 Customer Relationship Management Invoicing Shipping Distributors, retailers, and end users Sales Order (order entry, product configuration, sales management)
  • 81. 14 - 81© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Table 13.6 Bills of Material Work Orders Purchasing and Lead Times Routings and Lead Times Master Production Schedule Inventory Management ERP and MRP Figure 14.11 MRP
  • 82. 14 - 82© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall ERP and MRP Figure 14.11 Supply Chain Management Vendor Communication (schedules, EDI, advanced shipping notice, e-commerce, etc.)
  • 83. 14 - 83© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall ERP and MRP Figure 14.11Table 13.6 Finance/ Accounting General Ledger Accounts Receivable Payroll Accounts Payable
  • 84. 14 - 84© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)  ERP can be highly customized to meet specific business requirements  Enterprise application integration software (EAI) allows ERP systems to be integrated with  Warehouse management  Logistics  Electronic catalogs  Quality management
  • 85. 14 - 85© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)  ERP systems have the potential to  Reduce transaction costs  Increase the speed and accuracy of information  Facilitates a strategic emphasis on JIT systems and integration
  • 86. 14 - 86© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall SAP’s ERP Modules Figure 14.12
  • 87. 14 - 87© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Advantages of ERP Systems 1. Provides integration of the supply chain, production, and administration 2. Creates commonality of databases 3. Can incorporate improved best processes 4. Increases communication and collaboration between business units and sites 5. Has an off-the-shelf software database 6. May provide a strategic advantage
  • 88. 14 - 88© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Disadvantages of ERP Systems 1. Is very expensive to purchase and even more so to customize 2. Implementation may require major changes in the company and its processes 3. Is so complex that many companies cannot adjust to it 4. Involves an ongoing, possibly never completed, process for implementation 5. Expertise is limited with ongoing staffing problems
  • 89. 14 - 89© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall ERP in the Service Sector  ERP systems have been developed for health care, government, retail stores, hotels, and financial services  Also called efficient consumer response (ECR) systems  Objective is to tie sales to buying, inventory, logistics, and production
  • 90. 14 - 90© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.