27. Lack of time
⢠âResearchers are too busy to faff around LOLingâ
â J. Rohn
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
28. Lack of time
⢠âResearchers are too busy to faff around LOLingâ
â J. Rohn
⢠Researchers do not have time to build platforms
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
29. Lack of time
⢠âResearchers are too busy to faff around LOLingâ
â J. Rohn
⢠Researchers do not have time to build platforms
⢠Researchers do not have time to beta test
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
30. Lack of time
⢠âResearchers are too busy to faff around LOLingâ
â J. Rohn
⢠Researchers do not have time to build platforms
⢠Researchers do not have time to beta test
⢠Researchers are writing slides on the train...
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
33. Lack of value
⢠Whatâs in it for me?
âThese web tools must, ďŹrst of all, solve some
problem the users have without needing to resort
to ânetwork effectsâ. Those beneďŹts should come as
a bonusâ
â P. Beltrao
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
36. Creating products
⢠Build a service
⢠make it fulďŹll a need
⢠make it work!
âWeb tools need to appeal ďŹrst to bench
scientists, not web-savvy techiesâ
â A. Kushnir
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
38. Who are you?
âWith academics in mind, [it] records authorship,
assigns copyright, deďŹnes licenses, manages editing,
and includes custom software for an interactive
peer-review process. This pre-publishing
environment will be further streamlined to include
one-click submission of peer-reviewed articles for
open access or 'traditional' publication when an
appropriate publishing partner/solution is identiďŹedâ
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
40. What do you want?
I looked at the site, and NOBODY IS
GOING TO USE THAT EVER
â E. Amsen
⢠âOrdinaryâ researchers
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
41. What do you want?
I looked at the site, and NOBODY IS
GOING TO USE THAT EVER
â E. Amsen
⢠âOrdinaryâ researchers
⢠Make friends, not war
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
42. Clever cookies
⢠Cameron Neylon:
http://blog.openwetware.org/scienceintheopen/
⢠Augmented browsing1
⢠Nature Network
1. PaďŹlis, Evangelos, OâDonoghue, SeĂĄn, Jensen, Lars, Horn, Heiko, Kuhn, Michael,
Brown, Nigel, and Schneider, Reinhard.
ReďŹect: Augmented Browsing for the Life Scientist. Available from Nature Precedings
<http://hdl.handle.net/10101/npre.2009.3212.1> (2009) http://rg-d.com/rpg/
46. Grantâs Law
⢠Social media tools must work off the bat and
have a deďŹned value before being accepted
by mainstream scientists
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
47. Grantâs Law
⢠Social media tools must work off the bat and
have a deďŹned value before being accepted
by mainstream scientists
Corollary
⢠Any social media tool that requires user development
will fail
http://network.nature.com/people/rpg/blog/2009/05/01/on-social-media
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
48. Who do you trust?
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
http://f1000.com/
49. Who do you trust?
⢠WikiFAIL â Maurice Jarre
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
http://f1000.com/
50. Who do you trust?
⢠WikiFAIL â Maurice Jarre
⢠Random nutters on the internet
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
http://f1000.com/
51. Who do you trust?
⢠WikiFAIL â Maurice Jarre
⢠Random nutters on the internet
⢠F1000?
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
http://f1000.com/
53. So what do you want?
⢠Protocols/products â where is the
information?
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
54. So what do you want?
⢠Protocols/products â where is the
information?
⢠Open science
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
55. So what do you want?
⢠Protocols/products â where is the
information?
⢠Open science
⢠Networking â enabling research
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
57. More questions than
answers
⢠Scientists already socialize as âordinary
peopleâ â Facebook, Twitter, etc.
⢠Is it worth convincing researchers of the
professional beneďŹts of Social Media?
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
58. More questions than
answers
⢠Scientists already socialize as âordinary
peopleâ â Facebook, Twitter, etc.
⢠Is it worth convincing researchers of the
professional beneďŹts of Social Media?
⢠If so, how?
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
62. Necessary/sufďŹcient
⢠Not enough to ask âwhat do you want?â
⢠Nor even to (just) have a bright idea
⢠âWhat will people want?â
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
63. Question
Are there times when science shouldnât be a
conversation? When sitting quietly and
listening is more important than joining in
discussion?
â David Crotty, CSH
http://rg-d.com/rpg/
Hinweis der Redaktion
scientists like new stuff, they are early adapters, and tend to embrace new technology if it’s demonstrably better and cheaper. With exceptions, natch.
scientists like new stuff, they are early adapters, and tend to embrace new technology if it’s demonstrably better and cheaper. With exceptions, natch.
scientists like new stuff, they are early adapters, and tend to embrace new technology if it’s demonstrably better and cheaper. With exceptions, natch.
scientists like new stuff, they are early adapters, and tend to embrace new technology if it’s demonstrably better and cheaper. With exceptions, natch.
scientists like new stuff, they are early adapters, and tend to embrace new technology if it’s demonstrably better and cheaper. With exceptions, natch.
scientists like new stuff, they are early adapters, and tend to embrace new technology if it’s demonstrably better and cheaper. With exceptions, natch.
scientists like new stuff, they are early adapters, and tend to embrace new technology if it’s demonstrably better and cheaper. With exceptions, natch.
scientists like new stuff, they are early adapters, and tend to embrace new technology if it’s demonstrably better and cheaper. With exceptions, natch.