SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 94
The Effects of Triclosan on Five Marine Algae Species Melanie N. McHenry Department of Biology, Marine Science Program, Jackson State University, P.O. Box 18540, 1400 J.R. Lynch Street, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
Table of Contents ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Introduction ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Background Information on Triclosan ,[object Object],Trade names:   Irgasan Registered Trademark DP 300,  Irgasan Registered Trademark PE 30,  Irgasan Registered Trademark PG 60,  and Irgacide Registered Trademark LP 10
Background Information on Triclosan Cont. ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Background Information Cont. ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Background Information Cont. ,[object Object],Surface Water Levels (µg/L) Source U.S. Rivers 0.24 - 2.7 Kolpin DW., et al. 2002 U.S. Geological Survey 0.8 (average) Tromso-Sound, Norway 0.2 - 2.4 Weigel s., et al. 2004 Bayou St. John Lake (New Orleans, Louisiana) 29 ng/L Boyd,  et al.  2004 Swiss Rivers 11 - 98 ng/L Balmer, 2005
Background Information Cont. Triclosan Levels in Waste Water Waste water Levels ( µ g/L) Source Primary Effluent 3.4 - 8.0  McAvoy, DC et al. 2002 Final Effluent: Activated Sludge Treatment 0.20 - 0.41 Weigel S. et al. : 2004 Trickling Filter Treatment 1.6 - 2.7 Switzerland Effluents 42 - 213 mg/L   Balmer 2005
Background Information Contd. ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Algae Used in this Study Tetraselmis chuii Nannochloropsis oculata Chaetocerus gracilis Isochrysis galbana Rhodomonas salina
Algae Information Algae Class Size (µm) Motile Flagella Isochrysis Prymnesiophyceae 4 – 8 yes 2 flagella Tetraselmis Chlorophyceae 12 -  14 4 flagella Nannochloropsis Eustigmatophyceae 1.5 - 2.5 no none Rhodomonas Cryptophyceae   16 – 30 yes Chaetocerus Baccillariophyceae 12 - 14 no
The Effects of Triclosan on Various Organisms  (Balmer 2005, Russel 2004, Orvos  et al.  2002) Organism L(E) 50 Algae Freshwater algae Anabaena flos-aquae 0.97 µg/L Scenedesmus subspicatus 2. 8 µg/L Selenastrum capricornutum 4.46 µg/L Navicula pelliculosa 19.1 µg/L Marine Algae Skeletonema costatum > 66.0 µg/L Fish Danio rerio  and  Oryzais latipes < 300 µg/L Pimephales promelas 260 µg/L  Lepomis macrochirus 370 µg/L Seamonkeys Artemia 2000 µg/L Bacteria Methicillin-resistant Staphylococci 0.1 – 2 mg/L E. coli  and  K. pueumoniae 5,000 µg/L
Objectives ,[object Object],[object Object]
Experimental Design Treatment (ug/L) Replicate # Temperature (average) Salinity Light (lux) Control 0 3 25 o C 25ppt 2,200 1 0.2 3 25 o C 25ppt 2,200 2 1.0 3 25 o C 25ppt 2,200 3 5.0 3 25 o C 25ppt 2,200 4 25.0 3 25 o C 25ppt 2,200 5 125 3 25 o C 25ppt 2,200 6 250 3 25 o C 25ppt 2,200 7 500 3 25 o C 25ppt 2,200 Solvent Control 7.2% Ethyl Alcohol 3  25 o C 25ppt 2,200
Data Analysis ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Results: Effects of Triclosan on Algae Growth ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Isochrysis galbana
Tetraselmis chuii
Nannochloropsis oculata
Rhodomonas salina
Chaetocerus gracilis
Results: Effects of Triclsoan on Algae Growth Rates ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Isochrysis galbana
Isochrysis  growth rate ANOVA table 24 hours Source of Variation Degrees of  Freedom Sum of Squares Mean  Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 36.61077037 3.66107704 369.77 < 0.0001 Error 16 0.15841481 0.00990093 Total 26 36.76918519 R-Square Coefficient  Var Root MSE YIELD  Mean 0.995692 13.61679 0.099503 0.730741
Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 1.85667 3 Control B 1.65000 3 Treatment 1 C 1.29333 3 Treatment 2 D 1.02333 3 Treatment 3 E 0.61333 3 Treatment 4 F 0.31000 3 Treatment 5 G -0.01000 3 Treatment 6 H -203333 3 Treatment 7 A 1.87333 3 Treatment 8
Isochrysis  growth rate ANOVA table 48 hours Source of Variation Degrees of  Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 8.75095556 0.87509556 198.57 <  0.0001 Error 16 0.07051111 0.00440694  Total 26 8.82146667 R-Square Coefficient  Var Root MSE YIELD  Mean 0.992007 12.11893 0.066385 0.547778
Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 1.16667 3 Control B 0.91000 3 Treatment 1 C 0.72000 3 Treatment 2 D 0.57667 3 Treatment 3 E D 0.49000 3 Treatment 4 E 0.42333 3 Treatment 5 F 0.23667 3 Treatment 6 G -0.8000 3 Treatment 7 A 1.20667 3 Treatment 8
Isochrysis  growth rate ANOVA table 72 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 2.49982222 0.24998222 1097.48 <0.0001 Error 16 0.00364444 0.00022778 Total 26 2.50346667 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.998544 2.538893 0.015092 0.594444
Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.9600 3 Control B 0.8500 3 Treatment 1 C 0.82333 3 Treatment 2 D 0.75667 3 Treatment 3 E 0.67333 3 Treatment 4 F 0.56667 3 Treatment 5 G 0.48667 3 Treatment 6 H 0.31667 3 Treatment 7 I -0.08333 3 Treatment 8
Isochrysis  growth rate ANOVA table 96 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 1.23659259 0.12365926 763.15 < <0.0001 Error 16 0.00259259 0.00016204 Total 26 1.23918519 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.997908 2.197527 0.012729 0.579259
Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.83333 3 Control A 0.82667 3 Treatment 1 B 0.73333 3 Treatment 2 C 0.67333 3 Treatment 3 D 0.59333 3 Treatment 4 E 0.52667 3 Treatment 5 F 0.48333 3 Treatment 6 G 0.43333 3 Treatment 7 H 0.1100 3 Treatment 8
Tetraselmis chuii
Tetraselmis  growth rate ANOVA table 24 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 10.17803704 1.01780370 81.79 < 0.0001 Error 16 0.1991037 0.01244398 Total 26 10.37714074 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.980813 55.36618 0.111553 0.201481
Means with the same letter are not significantly different  t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.68000 3 Control B A 0.60667 3 Treatment 1 B 0.51000 3 Treatment 2 B 0.46333 3 Treatment 3 C 0.24333 3 Treatment 4 C 0.14667 3 Treatment 5 D -0.15667 3 Treatment 6 E -1.36667 3 Treatment 7 A 0.68667 3 Treatment 8
Tetraselmis  growth rate ANOVA table 48 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 1.02720000 0.10272000 2.89 0.0287 Error 16 0.56946667 0.03559167 Total 26 1.59666667 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.643340 44.68205 0.188658 0.422222
Means with the same letter are not significantly different  t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.6200 3 Control A 0.5933 3 Treatment 1 B A 0.5567 3 Treatment 2 B A 0.5400 3 Treatment 3 B A 0.4567 3 Treatment 4 B 0.4667 3 Treatment 5 B C 0.2367 3 Treatment 6 C -0.0267 3 Treatment 7 A 0.3467 3 Treatment 8
Tetraselmis  growth rate ANOVA table 72 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 1.05683704 0.10568370 3.38 0.0149 Error 16 0.50061481 0.03128843 Total 26 1.55745185 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.678568 30.71321 0.176885 0.575926
Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.8567 3 Control B A 0.7700 3 Treatment 1 B A 0.6933 3 Treatment 2 B A C 0.6300 3 Treatment 3 B A C 0.5733 3 Treatment 4 B C 0.5100 3 Treatment 5 C 0.3767 3 Treatment 6 0.1600 3 Treatment 7 A 0.6133 3 Treatment 8
Tetraselmis  growth rate ANOVA table 96 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 0.77628889 0.07762889 3.08 0.0221 Error 16 0.40377778 0.02523611 Total 26 1.18006667 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.657835 21.69543 0.158859 0.73222
Means with the same letter are not significantly different  t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.8967 3 Control A 0.8700 3 Treatment 1 A 0.8500 3 Treatment 2 A 0.8067 3 Treatment 3 A 0.7867 3 Treatment 4 A 0.7433 3 Treatment 5 A 0.6600 3 Treatment 6 A 0.3067 3 Treatment 7 B 0.6700 3 Treatment 8
Nannochloropsis oculata
Nannochloropsis  growth rate ANOVA table 24 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 5.89219259 0.58921926 45.75 < 0.0001 Error 16 0.20605926 0.0128787 Total 26 6.09825185 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.966210 17.30140 0.113484 0.655926
Means with the same letter are not significantly different  t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 1.32667 3 Control B 0.92667 3 Treatment 1 C B 0.85000 3 Treatment 2 C 0.71000 3 Treatment 3 D 0.51333 3 Treatment 4 E 0.29333 3 Treatment 5 F -0.08333 3 Treatment 6 F 0.09333 3 Treatment 7 A 1.27333 3 Treatment 8
Nannochloropsis  growth rate ANOVA table 48 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 4.89813333 0.48981333 4.00 0.0069 Error 16 1.95913333 0.12244583 Total 26 6.85726667 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.714298 32.77111 0.349923 1.067778
Means with the same letter are not significantly different  t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 1.6300 3 Control B A 1.5067 3 Treatment 1 B A 1.3900 3 Treatment 2 B A C 1.1600 3 Treatment 3 B A C 1.1033 3 Treatment 4 B C 0.9500 3 Treatment 5 C 0.5600 3 Treatment 6 0.2100 3 Treatment 7 A 1.1000 3 Treatment 8
Nannochloropsis  growth rate ANOVA table 76 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 4.89813333 0.48981333 4.00 0.0069 Error 16 1.95913333 0.12244583 Total 26 6.85726667 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.714298 32.77111 0.349923 1.067778
Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment 1.63000 3 Control B 1.5067 3 Treatment 1 B 1.3900 3 Treatment 2 B C 1.1600 3 Treatment 3 B C 1.1033 3 Treatment 4 B C 1.1000 3 Treatment 5 D C 0.9500 3 Treatment 6 D 0.5600 3 Treatment 7 B A C 0.2100 3 Treatment 8
Nannochloropsis  growth rate ANOVA table 96 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 2.04006667 0.20400667 20.12 <0.0001 Error 16 0.16220000 0.01013750 Total 26 2.20226667 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.926349 19.52945 0.100685 0.515556
Means with the same letter are not significantly different  t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.73667 3 Control B A 0.7100 3 Treatment 1 B A 0.66333 3 Treatment 2 B A 0.63000 3 Treatment 3 B C 0.54667 3 Treatment 4 C 0.41000 3 Treatment 5 D 0.23333 3 Treatment 6 E -0.06333 3 Treatment 7 A 0.77333 3 Treatment 8
Rhodomonas salina
Rhodomonas  growth rate ANOVA table 24 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 3.28800000 0.32880000 31.99 <0.0001 Error 16 0.16446667 0.01027917 Total 26 3.45246667 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.952363 12.48257 0.101386 0.812222
Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 1.13667 3 Control B A 1.09333 3 Treatment 1 B C 0.95333 3 Treatment 2 C 0.91667 3 Treatment 3 D C 0.78667 3 Treatment 4 D 0.69333 3 Treatment 5 E 0.34667 3 Treatment 6 F 0.14333 3 Treatment 7 A 1.24000 3 Treatment 8
Rhodomonas  growth rate ANOVA table 48 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 1.68814815 0.16881481 2.29 0.0675 Error 16 1.17988148 0.07374259 Total 26 2.86802963 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.588609 35.55775 0.271556 0.763704
Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 1.1267 3 Control A 1.05333 3 Treatment 1 A 0.7267 3 Treatment 2 B A 0.8233 3 Treatment 3 B A 0.7600 3 Treatment 4 B A 0.7267 3 Treatment 5 B C 0.5567 3 Treatment 6 C 0.2333 3 Treatment 7 B A 0.8667 3 Treatment 8
Rhodomonas  growth rate ANOVA table 72 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 1.36481481 0.13648148 3.80 0.0087 Error 16 0.57394815 0.03587175 Total 26 1.93876296 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.703962 27.97460 0.189398 0.677037
Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.9300 3 Control A 0.8933 3 Treatment 1 A 0.8367 3 Treatment 2 A 0.8100 3 Treatment 3 B A 0.7167 3 Treatment 4 B A 0.6300 3 Treatment 5 B C 0.4567 3 Treatment 6 C 0.1800 3 Treatment 7 B A 0.6400 3 Treatment 8
Rhodomonas  growth rate ANOVA table 96 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 0.97977037 0.09797704 3.17 0.0196 Error 16 0.49503704 0.03093981 Total 26 1.47480741 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.664338 29.90695 0.175897 0.599148
Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.8600 3 Control B A 0.7567 3 Treatment 1 B A C 0.6900 3 Treatment 2 B A C 0.6567 3 Treatment 3 B A C 0.6000 3 Treatment 4 B C 0.5467 3 Treatment 5 D C 0.4167 3 Treatment 6 D 0.1667 3 Treatment 7 B A C 0.6000 3 Treatment 8
Chaetocerus gracilis
Chaetocerus  growth rate ANOVA table 24 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 35.12774815 3.51277481 34.51 < 0.0001 Error 16 1.62859259 0.010178704 Total 26 36.75634074 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.955692 32.94112 0.319041 0.968519
Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 2.0967 3 Control B A 1.7767 3 Treatment 1 B A 1.5867 3 Treatment 2 B C 1.2633 3 Treatment 3 D C 0.9100 3 Treatment 4 D 0.6700 3 Treatment 5 E 0.0433 3 Treatment 6 F -1.6967 3 Treatment 7 A 2.0667 3 Treatment 8
Chaetocerus  growth rate ANOVA table 48 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 4.85472593 0.48547259 2.86 0.0298 Error 16 2.71705926 0.16981620 Total 26 7.57178519 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.641160 50.82853 0.412088 0.810741
Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 1.3067 3 Control B A 1.1767 3 Treatment 1 B A 1.0633 3 Treatment 2 B A 0.9633 3 Treatment 3 B A 0.9000 3 Treatment 4 B A 0.8033 3 Treatment 5 B 0.5367 3 Treatment 6 C -0.2133 3 Treatment 7 B A 0.7600 3 Treatment 8
Chaetocerus  growth rate ANOVA table 72 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 1.06761482 0.10676148 3.04 0.0233 Error 16 0.56248148 0.03515509 Total 26 1.63009630 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.654940 29.31336 0.187497 0.639630
Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.9167 3 Control B A 0.8300 3 Treatment 1 B A 0.7700 3 Treatment 2 B A 0.6967 3 Treatment 3 B A 0.6500 3 Treatment 4 B A 0.6200 3 Treatment 5 B 0.5600 3 Treatment 6 C 0.5233 3 Treatment 7 B 0.5600 3 Treatment 8
Chaetocerus  growth rate ANOVA table 96 hour Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 0.65040000 0.06504000 2.63 0.0412 Error 16 0.39600000 0.02475000 Total 26 1.04640000 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.621560 27.76259 0.157321 0.56667
Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.7800 3 Control B A 0.7433 3 Treatment 1 B A C 0.6733 3 Treatment 2 B A C 0.5967 3 Treatment 3 B A C 0.5533 3 Treatment 4 B D C 0.5033 3 Treatment 5 D C 0.4500 3 Treatment 6 D 0.2367 3 Treatment 7 B A C 0.5633 3 Treatment 8
Results: Percent Inhibition ,[object Object],[object Object]
Percent Inhibition:  Isochrysis Percent Inhibition Initial Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Control (0µg/L) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Treatment 1 (0.2µg/L)  n/a 11.27 22.10 11.62 12.28 Treatment 2 (1.0µg/L)  n/a 30.40 38.49 21.35 19.11 Treatment 3 (5.0µg/L)  n/a 44.80 50.69 29.52 28.48 Treatment 4 (25µg/L) n/a 66.73 58.22 40.98 36.59 Treatment 5 (125µg/L) n/a 83.19 63.75 49.47 41.86 Treatment 6 (250µg/L) n/a 100.60 79.30 67.29 47.90 Treatment 7 (500µg/L) n/a 208.44 166.54 108.72 86.96 Treatment 8 (ethyl alcohol control) n/a -0.65 -3.10 14.09 0.72
Percent Inhibition:  Tetraselmis Percent Inhibition Initial Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Control (0µg/L) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Treatment 1 (0.2µg/L)  n/a 12.55 4.13 14.98 4.20 Treatment 2 (1.0µg/L)  n/a 26.30 7.89 20.47 7.27 Treatment 3 (5.0µg/L)  n/a 33.20 14.67 30.24 10.73 Treatment 4 (25µg/L) n/a 64.64 25.66 35.64 14.12 Treatment 5 (125µg/L) n/a 79.14 26.39 42.91 18.79 Treatment 6 (250µg/L) n/a 122.51 71.78 61.49 33.29 Treatment 7 (500µg/L) n/a 432.19 288.66 90.46 78.05 Treatment 8 (ethyl alcohol control) n/a -1.59 -0.54 -2.60 0.57
Percent Inhibition: Nannochloropsis Percent Inhibition Initial Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Control (0µg/L) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Treatment 1 (0.2µg/L) n/a 30.70 10.46 4.95 2.54 Treatment 2 (1.0µg/L) n/a 35.82 16.51 7.85 4.46 Treatment 3 (5.0µg/L) n/a 46.84 30.71 12.78 6.76 Treatment 4 (25µg/L) n/a 60.74 34.51 20.63 13.38 Treatment 5 (125µg/L) n/a 77.83 44.57 43.61 20.90 Treatment 6 (250µg/L) n/a 106.07 75.01 55.89 39.63 Treatment 7 (500µg/L) n/a 89.70 93.71 95.22 95.37 Treatment 8 (ethyl alcohol control) n/a -49.15 -21.24 -9.21 -9.08
Percent Inhibition: Rhodomonas Percent Inhibition Initial Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Control (0µg/L) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Treatment 1 (0.2µg/L)  n/a 4.10 22.20 4.82 14.02 Treatment 2 (1.0µg/L)  n/a 16.60 28.75 10.38 21.23 Treatment 3 (5.0µg/L)  n/a 20.02 30.98 14.93 22.55 Treatment 4 (25µg/L) n/a 31.18 34.81 25.45 33.28 Treatment 5 (125µg/L) n/a 39.50 36.92 32.12 36.87 Treatment 6 (250µg/L) n/a 68.58 57.83 60.78 56.97 Treatment 7 (500µg/L) n/a 87.38 92.06 90.54 91.51 Treatment 8 (ethyl alcohol control) n/a -13.41 -9.31 1.15 -1.61
Percent Inhibition:  Chaetocerus Percent Inhibition Initial Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Control (0µg/L) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Treatment 1 (0.2µg/L)  n/a 0.73 11.37 10.10 9.02 Treatment 2 (1.0µg/L)  n/a 11.43 21.11 16.12 18.73 Treatment 3 (5.0µg/L)  n/a 29.20 27.17 25.50 26.78 Treatment 4 (25µg/L) n/a 49.11 31.30 28.84 32.09 Treatment 5 (125µg/L) n/a 62.57 41.25 31.98 37.08 Treatment 6 (250µg/L) n/a 96.98 65.26 46.86 46.52 Treatment 7 (500µg/L) n/a 181.22 125.25 95.00 83.40 Treatment 8 (ethyl alcohol control) n/a -15.51 0.30 8.33 -1.95
EC 50   of Triclosan ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Isochrysis galbana
The time Period and its  corresponding EC 50  value Time Period EC 50  value Day 1 2.10 μg/mL Day 2 2.44 μg/mL Day 3 3.97 μg/mL Day 4 4.81 μg/mL
Tetraselmis chuii
The time period and its  corresponding EC 50  value Time Period EC 50  value Day 1 10.0 μg/mL Day 2 77.7 μg/mL Day 3 83.8 μg/mL Day 4 >500 μg/mL
Nannochloropsis oculata
The time period and its  corresponding EC 50  value Time Period EC 50  value Day 1 2.10  μg/mL Day 2 2.44  μg/mL Day 3 3.97  μg/mL Day 4 4.81  μg/mL
Rhodomonas salina
The time period and its  corresponding EC 50  value Time Period EC 50  value Control (0µg/L) 109 μg/mL Treatment 1 (0.2µg/L)  98 μg/mL Treatment 2 (1.0µg/L)  168 μg/mL Treatment 3 (5.0µg/L)  128 μg/mL
Chaetocerus gracilis
The time period and its  corresponding EC 50  value Time Period EC 50  value Control (0µg/L) 46.2 μg/mL Treatment 1 (0.2µg/L)  68 μg/mL Treatment 2 (1.0µg/L)  183 μg/mL Treatment 3 (5.0µg/L)  162 μg/mL
Discussion: Compare Marine to Freshwater Algae   Time Period Marine Algae Species EC 50  values Isochrysis Nannochloropsis Rhodomonas Chaetocerus Tetraselmis 24hr 10.8 6.3 109 46.2 10.0 48hr 68.5 72 98 68 77.7 72hr 182 165 168 183 83.8 96hr 164 360 128 162 >500 Freshwater Algae Species L(E) 50  values Navicula pelliculosa Selenastrum capricornutum Scenedesmus subspicatus Skeletonema costatum Anabaena flosaquae 96hr 19.1 µg/L 4.46 µg/L 2. 8 µg/L > 66.0 µg/L 0.97 µg/L
Discussion: Comparison of Algae, cont. (Orvos  et. al  2002). ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Discussion: Comparison of EC 50  and L(E) 50  Values of Other Organisms   Time Period Marine Algae Species EC 50  values Isochryis galbana Nannochloropsis oculata Rhodomonas salina Chaetocerus gracilis Tetraselmis chuii 24hr 10.8 6.3 109 46.2 10.0 48hr 68.5 72 98 68 77.7 72hr 182 165 168 183 83.8 96hr 164 360 128 162 >500 Organisms L(E) 50  values  Fish Seamonkeys Bacteria Danio rerio Oryzais latipes Artemia Staphylococci Pimephales promelas Lepomis macrochirus E. coli K. pueumoniae Pseudomonas aeruginosa < 300 µg/L 2000 µg/L 100-300 µg/L 260 µg/L 370 µg/L 5,000 µg/L 300,000-1,000,000 µg/L
Discussion: Comparison of Organisms, cont. ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Discussion: The Implication of Triclosan Toxicity ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Discussion: Comparison of the EC 50  Values among the Algae Species   Time Period Marine Algae Species EC 50  values Isochryis galbana Nannochloropsis oculata Rhodomonas salina Chaetocerus gracilis Tetraselmis chuii 24hr 10.8 6.3 109 46.2 10.0 48hr 68.5 72 98 68 77.7 72hr 182 165 168 183 83.8 96hr 164 360 128 162 >500
Discusssion: Visual comparison of the EC 50  (µg/L) values
Conclusion ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Special Thanks ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Acknowledgements This research was supported, in part, by a grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration grant # NA17AE1626, Subcontract # 27-0629-017, through the Environmental Cooperative Science Center at Florida A&M University to Jackson State University. M. McHenry was supported through the National Institutes of Health funded Research Initiative for Scientific Enhancement (RISE) grant awarded to Jackson State University.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Masters thesis

Expt. 7 Bioassay of acetylcholine using rat ileum by four point bioassay
Expt. 7 Bioassay of acetylcholine using rat ileum by four point bioassayExpt. 7 Bioassay of acetylcholine using rat ileum by four point bioassay
Expt. 7 Bioassay of acetylcholine using rat ileum by four point bioassayVISHALJADHAV100
 
Expt. 2 Bioassay of acetylcholine using rat ileum by four point bioassay
Expt. 2 Bioassay of acetylcholine using rat ileum by four point bioassayExpt. 2 Bioassay of acetylcholine using rat ileum by four point bioassay
Expt. 2 Bioassay of acetylcholine using rat ileum by four point bioassayVISHALJADHAV100
 
Response of aquatic fern(Azolla), to watercontamination
Response of aquatic fern(Azolla), to watercontaminationResponse of aquatic fern(Azolla), to watercontamination
Response of aquatic fern(Azolla), to watercontaminationKavitha Cingam
 
Application of Plasma in Food and Agriculture
Application of Plasma in Food and AgricultureApplication of Plasma in Food and Agriculture
Application of Plasma in Food and AgricultureSITHUHan3
 
Dielectric parameters of ayurvedic medicines
Dielectric parameters of ayurvedic medicinesDielectric parameters of ayurvedic medicines
Dielectric parameters of ayurvedic medicineseSAT Publishing House
 
Effect of Temperature on Stream Fish Energetics and Tolerance to Increasing U...
Effect of Temperature on Stream Fish Energetics and Tolerance to Increasing U...Effect of Temperature on Stream Fish Energetics and Tolerance to Increasing U...
Effect of Temperature on Stream Fish Energetics and Tolerance to Increasing U...Marylou Moore
 
05 2019 manila pleural infection final pdf
05 2019 manila pleural infection final pdf05 2019 manila pleural infection final pdf
05 2019 manila pleural infection final pdfipmslmc
 
Dielectric parameters of ayurvedic medicines biological approach
Dielectric parameters of ayurvedic medicines biological approachDielectric parameters of ayurvedic medicines biological approach
Dielectric parameters of ayurvedic medicines biological approacheSAT Journals
 
STUDIES ON THE CHRONIC TOXICITY OF CHLOROQUINE 1948
STUDIES ON THE CHRONIC TOXICITY OF CHLOROQUINE 1948STUDIES ON THE CHRONIC TOXICITY OF CHLOROQUINE 1948
STUDIES ON THE CHRONIC TOXICITY OF CHLOROQUINE 1948thierry jolaine
 
2017 - Environmental Ordination of Filamentous Bacteria in Activated Sludge
2017 - Environmental Ordination of Filamentous Bacteria in Activated Sludge2017 - Environmental Ordination of Filamentous Bacteria in Activated Sludge
2017 - Environmental Ordination of Filamentous Bacteria in Activated SludgeWALEBUBLÉ
 
Method Development and Validation of Tetracycline Antibiotics and their Epime...
Method Development and Validation of Tetracycline Antibiotics and their Epime...Method Development and Validation of Tetracycline Antibiotics and their Epime...
Method Development and Validation of Tetracycline Antibiotics and their Epime...Dr. Mukesh Raikwar
 

Ähnlich wie Masters thesis (20)

Expt. 7 Bioassay of acetylcholine using rat ileum by four point bioassay
Expt. 7 Bioassay of acetylcholine using rat ileum by four point bioassayExpt. 7 Bioassay of acetylcholine using rat ileum by four point bioassay
Expt. 7 Bioassay of acetylcholine using rat ileum by four point bioassay
 
Expt. 2 Bioassay of acetylcholine using rat ileum by four point bioassay
Expt. 2 Bioassay of acetylcholine using rat ileum by four point bioassayExpt. 2 Bioassay of acetylcholine using rat ileum by four point bioassay
Expt. 2 Bioassay of acetylcholine using rat ileum by four point bioassay
 
Response of aquatic fern(Azolla), to watercontamination
Response of aquatic fern(Azolla), to watercontaminationResponse of aquatic fern(Azolla), to watercontamination
Response of aquatic fern(Azolla), to watercontamination
 
Application of Plasma in Food and Agriculture
Application of Plasma in Food and AgricultureApplication of Plasma in Food and Agriculture
Application of Plasma in Food and Agriculture
 
0102 695 x-rbfar-27-03-0302
0102 695 x-rbfar-27-03-03020102 695 x-rbfar-27-03-0302
0102 695 x-rbfar-27-03-0302
 
Dielectric parameters of ayurvedic medicines
Dielectric parameters of ayurvedic medicinesDielectric parameters of ayurvedic medicines
Dielectric parameters of ayurvedic medicines
 
Tesis Maestría
Tesis MaestríaTesis Maestría
Tesis Maestría
 
Effect of Temperature on Stream Fish Energetics and Tolerance to Increasing U...
Effect of Temperature on Stream Fish Energetics and Tolerance to Increasing U...Effect of Temperature on Stream Fish Energetics and Tolerance to Increasing U...
Effect of Temperature on Stream Fish Energetics and Tolerance to Increasing U...
 
05 2019 manila pleural infection final pdf
05 2019 manila pleural infection final pdf05 2019 manila pleural infection final pdf
05 2019 manila pleural infection final pdf
 
Effect of Foliar Application of Liquid Organic Fertilizers on crop growth and...
Effect of Foliar Application of Liquid Organic Fertilizers on crop growth and...Effect of Foliar Application of Liquid Organic Fertilizers on crop growth and...
Effect of Foliar Application of Liquid Organic Fertilizers on crop growth and...
 
2014 anthraquinones from vismia mexicana
2014 anthraquinones from vismia mexicana2014 anthraquinones from vismia mexicana
2014 anthraquinones from vismia mexicana
 
Chromatography: Concentration of Human Hormones in Drinking Water Using a N...
Chromatography:   Concentration of Human Hormones in Drinking Water Using a N...Chromatography:   Concentration of Human Hormones in Drinking Water Using a N...
Chromatography: Concentration of Human Hormones in Drinking Water Using a N...
 
Monday theme 4 1545 1600 small briefing room soboka
Monday theme 4 1545 1600 small briefing room sobokaMonday theme 4 1545 1600 small briefing room soboka
Monday theme 4 1545 1600 small briefing room soboka
 
英文论文
英文论文英文论文
英文论文
 
Dielectric parameters of ayurvedic medicines biological approach
Dielectric parameters of ayurvedic medicines biological approachDielectric parameters of ayurvedic medicines biological approach
Dielectric parameters of ayurvedic medicines biological approach
 
2014 abstracs.pdf
2014 abstracs.pdf2014 abstracs.pdf
2014 abstracs.pdf
 
STUDIES ON THE CHRONIC TOXICITY OF CHLOROQUINE 1948
STUDIES ON THE CHRONIC TOXICITY OF CHLOROQUINE 1948STUDIES ON THE CHRONIC TOXICITY OF CHLOROQUINE 1948
STUDIES ON THE CHRONIC TOXICITY OF CHLOROQUINE 1948
 
2017 - Environmental Ordination of Filamentous Bacteria in Activated Sludge
2017 - Environmental Ordination of Filamentous Bacteria in Activated Sludge2017 - Environmental Ordination of Filamentous Bacteria in Activated Sludge
2017 - Environmental Ordination of Filamentous Bacteria in Activated Sludge
 
Effect of Fish Size and Treatment Conditions on the Piscicidal Activity of Ne...
Effect of Fish Size and Treatment Conditions on the Piscicidal Activity of Ne...Effect of Fish Size and Treatment Conditions on the Piscicidal Activity of Ne...
Effect of Fish Size and Treatment Conditions on the Piscicidal Activity of Ne...
 
Method Development and Validation of Tetracycline Antibiotics and their Epime...
Method Development and Validation of Tetracycline Antibiotics and their Epime...Method Development and Validation of Tetracycline Antibiotics and their Epime...
Method Development and Validation of Tetracycline Antibiotics and their Epime...
 

Masters thesis

  • 1. The Effects of Triclosan on Five Marine Algae Species Melanie N. McHenry Department of Biology, Marine Science Program, Jackson State University, P.O. Box 18540, 1400 J.R. Lynch Street, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8. Background Information Cont. Triclosan Levels in Waste Water Waste water Levels ( µ g/L) Source Primary Effluent 3.4 - 8.0 McAvoy, DC et al. 2002 Final Effluent: Activated Sludge Treatment 0.20 - 0.41 Weigel S. et al. : 2004 Trickling Filter Treatment 1.6 - 2.7 Switzerland Effluents 42 - 213 mg/L Balmer 2005
  • 9.
  • 10. Algae Used in this Study Tetraselmis chuii Nannochloropsis oculata Chaetocerus gracilis Isochrysis galbana Rhodomonas salina
  • 11. Algae Information Algae Class Size (µm) Motile Flagella Isochrysis Prymnesiophyceae 4 – 8 yes 2 flagella Tetraselmis Chlorophyceae 12 - 14 4 flagella Nannochloropsis Eustigmatophyceae 1.5 - 2.5 no none Rhodomonas Cryptophyceae 16 – 30 yes Chaetocerus Baccillariophyceae 12 - 14 no
  • 12. The Effects of Triclosan on Various Organisms (Balmer 2005, Russel 2004, Orvos et al. 2002) Organism L(E) 50 Algae Freshwater algae Anabaena flos-aquae 0.97 µg/L Scenedesmus subspicatus 2. 8 µg/L Selenastrum capricornutum 4.46 µg/L Navicula pelliculosa 19.1 µg/L Marine Algae Skeletonema costatum > 66.0 µg/L Fish Danio rerio and Oryzais latipes < 300 µg/L Pimephales promelas 260 µg/L Lepomis macrochirus 370 µg/L Seamonkeys Artemia 2000 µg/L Bacteria Methicillin-resistant Staphylococci 0.1 – 2 mg/L E. coli and K. pueumoniae 5,000 µg/L
  • 13.
  • 14. Experimental Design Treatment (ug/L) Replicate # Temperature (average) Salinity Light (lux) Control 0 3 25 o C 25ppt 2,200 1 0.2 3 25 o C 25ppt 2,200 2 1.0 3 25 o C 25ppt 2,200 3 5.0 3 25 o C 25ppt 2,200 4 25.0 3 25 o C 25ppt 2,200 5 125 3 25 o C 25ppt 2,200 6 250 3 25 o C 25ppt 2,200 7 500 3 25 o C 25ppt 2,200 Solvent Control 7.2% Ethyl Alcohol 3 25 o C 25ppt 2,200
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 22.
  • 24. Isochrysis growth rate ANOVA table 24 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 36.61077037 3.66107704 369.77 < 0.0001 Error 16 0.15841481 0.00990093 Total 26 36.76918519 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.995692 13.61679 0.099503 0.730741
  • 25. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 1.85667 3 Control B 1.65000 3 Treatment 1 C 1.29333 3 Treatment 2 D 1.02333 3 Treatment 3 E 0.61333 3 Treatment 4 F 0.31000 3 Treatment 5 G -0.01000 3 Treatment 6 H -203333 3 Treatment 7 A 1.87333 3 Treatment 8
  • 26. Isochrysis growth rate ANOVA table 48 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 8.75095556 0.87509556 198.57 < 0.0001 Error 16 0.07051111 0.00440694 Total 26 8.82146667 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.992007 12.11893 0.066385 0.547778
  • 27. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 1.16667 3 Control B 0.91000 3 Treatment 1 C 0.72000 3 Treatment 2 D 0.57667 3 Treatment 3 E D 0.49000 3 Treatment 4 E 0.42333 3 Treatment 5 F 0.23667 3 Treatment 6 G -0.8000 3 Treatment 7 A 1.20667 3 Treatment 8
  • 28. Isochrysis growth rate ANOVA table 72 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 2.49982222 0.24998222 1097.48 <0.0001 Error 16 0.00364444 0.00022778 Total 26 2.50346667 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.998544 2.538893 0.015092 0.594444
  • 29. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.9600 3 Control B 0.8500 3 Treatment 1 C 0.82333 3 Treatment 2 D 0.75667 3 Treatment 3 E 0.67333 3 Treatment 4 F 0.56667 3 Treatment 5 G 0.48667 3 Treatment 6 H 0.31667 3 Treatment 7 I -0.08333 3 Treatment 8
  • 30. Isochrysis growth rate ANOVA table 96 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 1.23659259 0.12365926 763.15 < <0.0001 Error 16 0.00259259 0.00016204 Total 26 1.23918519 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.997908 2.197527 0.012729 0.579259
  • 31. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.83333 3 Control A 0.82667 3 Treatment 1 B 0.73333 3 Treatment 2 C 0.67333 3 Treatment 3 D 0.59333 3 Treatment 4 E 0.52667 3 Treatment 5 F 0.48333 3 Treatment 6 G 0.43333 3 Treatment 7 H 0.1100 3 Treatment 8
  • 33. Tetraselmis growth rate ANOVA table 24 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 10.17803704 1.01780370 81.79 < 0.0001 Error 16 0.1991037 0.01244398 Total 26 10.37714074 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.980813 55.36618 0.111553 0.201481
  • 34. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.68000 3 Control B A 0.60667 3 Treatment 1 B 0.51000 3 Treatment 2 B 0.46333 3 Treatment 3 C 0.24333 3 Treatment 4 C 0.14667 3 Treatment 5 D -0.15667 3 Treatment 6 E -1.36667 3 Treatment 7 A 0.68667 3 Treatment 8
  • 35. Tetraselmis growth rate ANOVA table 48 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 1.02720000 0.10272000 2.89 0.0287 Error 16 0.56946667 0.03559167 Total 26 1.59666667 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.643340 44.68205 0.188658 0.422222
  • 36. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.6200 3 Control A 0.5933 3 Treatment 1 B A 0.5567 3 Treatment 2 B A 0.5400 3 Treatment 3 B A 0.4567 3 Treatment 4 B 0.4667 3 Treatment 5 B C 0.2367 3 Treatment 6 C -0.0267 3 Treatment 7 A 0.3467 3 Treatment 8
  • 37. Tetraselmis growth rate ANOVA table 72 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 1.05683704 0.10568370 3.38 0.0149 Error 16 0.50061481 0.03128843 Total 26 1.55745185 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.678568 30.71321 0.176885 0.575926
  • 38. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.8567 3 Control B A 0.7700 3 Treatment 1 B A 0.6933 3 Treatment 2 B A C 0.6300 3 Treatment 3 B A C 0.5733 3 Treatment 4 B C 0.5100 3 Treatment 5 C 0.3767 3 Treatment 6 0.1600 3 Treatment 7 A 0.6133 3 Treatment 8
  • 39. Tetraselmis growth rate ANOVA table 96 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 0.77628889 0.07762889 3.08 0.0221 Error 16 0.40377778 0.02523611 Total 26 1.18006667 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.657835 21.69543 0.158859 0.73222
  • 40. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.8967 3 Control A 0.8700 3 Treatment 1 A 0.8500 3 Treatment 2 A 0.8067 3 Treatment 3 A 0.7867 3 Treatment 4 A 0.7433 3 Treatment 5 A 0.6600 3 Treatment 6 A 0.3067 3 Treatment 7 B 0.6700 3 Treatment 8
  • 42. Nannochloropsis growth rate ANOVA table 24 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 5.89219259 0.58921926 45.75 < 0.0001 Error 16 0.20605926 0.0128787 Total 26 6.09825185 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.966210 17.30140 0.113484 0.655926
  • 43. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 1.32667 3 Control B 0.92667 3 Treatment 1 C B 0.85000 3 Treatment 2 C 0.71000 3 Treatment 3 D 0.51333 3 Treatment 4 E 0.29333 3 Treatment 5 F -0.08333 3 Treatment 6 F 0.09333 3 Treatment 7 A 1.27333 3 Treatment 8
  • 44. Nannochloropsis growth rate ANOVA table 48 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 4.89813333 0.48981333 4.00 0.0069 Error 16 1.95913333 0.12244583 Total 26 6.85726667 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.714298 32.77111 0.349923 1.067778
  • 45. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 1.6300 3 Control B A 1.5067 3 Treatment 1 B A 1.3900 3 Treatment 2 B A C 1.1600 3 Treatment 3 B A C 1.1033 3 Treatment 4 B C 0.9500 3 Treatment 5 C 0.5600 3 Treatment 6 0.2100 3 Treatment 7 A 1.1000 3 Treatment 8
  • 46. Nannochloropsis growth rate ANOVA table 76 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 4.89813333 0.48981333 4.00 0.0069 Error 16 1.95913333 0.12244583 Total 26 6.85726667 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.714298 32.77111 0.349923 1.067778
  • 47. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment 1.63000 3 Control B 1.5067 3 Treatment 1 B 1.3900 3 Treatment 2 B C 1.1600 3 Treatment 3 B C 1.1033 3 Treatment 4 B C 1.1000 3 Treatment 5 D C 0.9500 3 Treatment 6 D 0.5600 3 Treatment 7 B A C 0.2100 3 Treatment 8
  • 48. Nannochloropsis growth rate ANOVA table 96 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 2.04006667 0.20400667 20.12 <0.0001 Error 16 0.16220000 0.01013750 Total 26 2.20226667 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.926349 19.52945 0.100685 0.515556
  • 49. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.73667 3 Control B A 0.7100 3 Treatment 1 B A 0.66333 3 Treatment 2 B A 0.63000 3 Treatment 3 B C 0.54667 3 Treatment 4 C 0.41000 3 Treatment 5 D 0.23333 3 Treatment 6 E -0.06333 3 Treatment 7 A 0.77333 3 Treatment 8
  • 51. Rhodomonas growth rate ANOVA table 24 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 3.28800000 0.32880000 31.99 <0.0001 Error 16 0.16446667 0.01027917 Total 26 3.45246667 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.952363 12.48257 0.101386 0.812222
  • 52. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 1.13667 3 Control B A 1.09333 3 Treatment 1 B C 0.95333 3 Treatment 2 C 0.91667 3 Treatment 3 D C 0.78667 3 Treatment 4 D 0.69333 3 Treatment 5 E 0.34667 3 Treatment 6 F 0.14333 3 Treatment 7 A 1.24000 3 Treatment 8
  • 53. Rhodomonas growth rate ANOVA table 48 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 1.68814815 0.16881481 2.29 0.0675 Error 16 1.17988148 0.07374259 Total 26 2.86802963 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.588609 35.55775 0.271556 0.763704
  • 54. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 1.1267 3 Control A 1.05333 3 Treatment 1 A 0.7267 3 Treatment 2 B A 0.8233 3 Treatment 3 B A 0.7600 3 Treatment 4 B A 0.7267 3 Treatment 5 B C 0.5567 3 Treatment 6 C 0.2333 3 Treatment 7 B A 0.8667 3 Treatment 8
  • 55. Rhodomonas growth rate ANOVA table 72 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 1.36481481 0.13648148 3.80 0.0087 Error 16 0.57394815 0.03587175 Total 26 1.93876296 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.703962 27.97460 0.189398 0.677037
  • 56. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.9300 3 Control A 0.8933 3 Treatment 1 A 0.8367 3 Treatment 2 A 0.8100 3 Treatment 3 B A 0.7167 3 Treatment 4 B A 0.6300 3 Treatment 5 B C 0.4567 3 Treatment 6 C 0.1800 3 Treatment 7 B A 0.6400 3 Treatment 8
  • 57. Rhodomonas growth rate ANOVA table 96 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 0.97977037 0.09797704 3.17 0.0196 Error 16 0.49503704 0.03093981 Total 26 1.47480741 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.664338 29.90695 0.175897 0.599148
  • 58. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.8600 3 Control B A 0.7567 3 Treatment 1 B A C 0.6900 3 Treatment 2 B A C 0.6567 3 Treatment 3 B A C 0.6000 3 Treatment 4 B C 0.5467 3 Treatment 5 D C 0.4167 3 Treatment 6 D 0.1667 3 Treatment 7 B A C 0.6000 3 Treatment 8
  • 60. Chaetocerus growth rate ANOVA table 24 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 35.12774815 3.51277481 34.51 < 0.0001 Error 16 1.62859259 0.010178704 Total 26 36.75634074 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.955692 32.94112 0.319041 0.968519
  • 61. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 2.0967 3 Control B A 1.7767 3 Treatment 1 B A 1.5867 3 Treatment 2 B C 1.2633 3 Treatment 3 D C 0.9100 3 Treatment 4 D 0.6700 3 Treatment 5 E 0.0433 3 Treatment 6 F -1.6967 3 Treatment 7 A 2.0667 3 Treatment 8
  • 62. Chaetocerus growth rate ANOVA table 48 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 4.85472593 0.48547259 2.86 0.0298 Error 16 2.71705926 0.16981620 Total 26 7.57178519 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.641160 50.82853 0.412088 0.810741
  • 63. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 1.3067 3 Control B A 1.1767 3 Treatment 1 B A 1.0633 3 Treatment 2 B A 0.9633 3 Treatment 3 B A 0.9000 3 Treatment 4 B A 0.8033 3 Treatment 5 B 0.5367 3 Treatment 6 C -0.2133 3 Treatment 7 B A 0.7600 3 Treatment 8
  • 64. Chaetocerus growth rate ANOVA table 72 hours Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 1.06761482 0.10676148 3.04 0.0233 Error 16 0.56248148 0.03515509 Total 26 1.63009630 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.654940 29.31336 0.187497 0.639630
  • 65. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.9167 3 Control B A 0.8300 3 Treatment 1 B A 0.7700 3 Treatment 2 B A 0.6967 3 Treatment 3 B A 0.6500 3 Treatment 4 B A 0.6200 3 Treatment 5 B 0.5600 3 Treatment 6 C 0.5233 3 Treatment 7 B 0.5600 3 Treatment 8
  • 66. Chaetocerus growth rate ANOVA table 96 hour Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Square F-Value Pr > F Model 10 0.65040000 0.06504000 2.63 0.0412 Error 16 0.39600000 0.02475000 Total 26 1.04640000 R-Square Coefficient Var Root MSE YIELD Mean 0.621560 27.76259 0.157321 0.56667
  • 67. Means with the same letter are not significantly different t Grouping Mean N Treatment A 0.7800 3 Control B A 0.7433 3 Treatment 1 B A C 0.6733 3 Treatment 2 B A C 0.5967 3 Treatment 3 B A C 0.5533 3 Treatment 4 B D C 0.5033 3 Treatment 5 D C 0.4500 3 Treatment 6 D 0.2367 3 Treatment 7 B A C 0.5633 3 Treatment 8
  • 68.
  • 69. Percent Inhibition: Isochrysis Percent Inhibition Initial Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Control (0µg/L) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Treatment 1 (0.2µg/L) n/a 11.27 22.10 11.62 12.28 Treatment 2 (1.0µg/L) n/a 30.40 38.49 21.35 19.11 Treatment 3 (5.0µg/L) n/a 44.80 50.69 29.52 28.48 Treatment 4 (25µg/L) n/a 66.73 58.22 40.98 36.59 Treatment 5 (125µg/L) n/a 83.19 63.75 49.47 41.86 Treatment 6 (250µg/L) n/a 100.60 79.30 67.29 47.90 Treatment 7 (500µg/L) n/a 208.44 166.54 108.72 86.96 Treatment 8 (ethyl alcohol control) n/a -0.65 -3.10 14.09 0.72
  • 70. Percent Inhibition: Tetraselmis Percent Inhibition Initial Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Control (0µg/L) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Treatment 1 (0.2µg/L) n/a 12.55 4.13 14.98 4.20 Treatment 2 (1.0µg/L) n/a 26.30 7.89 20.47 7.27 Treatment 3 (5.0µg/L) n/a 33.20 14.67 30.24 10.73 Treatment 4 (25µg/L) n/a 64.64 25.66 35.64 14.12 Treatment 5 (125µg/L) n/a 79.14 26.39 42.91 18.79 Treatment 6 (250µg/L) n/a 122.51 71.78 61.49 33.29 Treatment 7 (500µg/L) n/a 432.19 288.66 90.46 78.05 Treatment 8 (ethyl alcohol control) n/a -1.59 -0.54 -2.60 0.57
  • 71. Percent Inhibition: Nannochloropsis Percent Inhibition Initial Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Control (0µg/L) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Treatment 1 (0.2µg/L) n/a 30.70 10.46 4.95 2.54 Treatment 2 (1.0µg/L) n/a 35.82 16.51 7.85 4.46 Treatment 3 (5.0µg/L) n/a 46.84 30.71 12.78 6.76 Treatment 4 (25µg/L) n/a 60.74 34.51 20.63 13.38 Treatment 5 (125µg/L) n/a 77.83 44.57 43.61 20.90 Treatment 6 (250µg/L) n/a 106.07 75.01 55.89 39.63 Treatment 7 (500µg/L) n/a 89.70 93.71 95.22 95.37 Treatment 8 (ethyl alcohol control) n/a -49.15 -21.24 -9.21 -9.08
  • 72. Percent Inhibition: Rhodomonas Percent Inhibition Initial Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Control (0µg/L) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Treatment 1 (0.2µg/L) n/a 4.10 22.20 4.82 14.02 Treatment 2 (1.0µg/L) n/a 16.60 28.75 10.38 21.23 Treatment 3 (5.0µg/L) n/a 20.02 30.98 14.93 22.55 Treatment 4 (25µg/L) n/a 31.18 34.81 25.45 33.28 Treatment 5 (125µg/L) n/a 39.50 36.92 32.12 36.87 Treatment 6 (250µg/L) n/a 68.58 57.83 60.78 56.97 Treatment 7 (500µg/L) n/a 87.38 92.06 90.54 91.51 Treatment 8 (ethyl alcohol control) n/a -13.41 -9.31 1.15 -1.61
  • 73. Percent Inhibition: Chaetocerus Percent Inhibition Initial Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Control (0µg/L) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Treatment 1 (0.2µg/L) n/a 0.73 11.37 10.10 9.02 Treatment 2 (1.0µg/L) n/a 11.43 21.11 16.12 18.73 Treatment 3 (5.0µg/L) n/a 29.20 27.17 25.50 26.78 Treatment 4 (25µg/L) n/a 49.11 31.30 28.84 32.09 Treatment 5 (125µg/L) n/a 62.57 41.25 31.98 37.08 Treatment 6 (250µg/L) n/a 96.98 65.26 46.86 46.52 Treatment 7 (500µg/L) n/a 181.22 125.25 95.00 83.40 Treatment 8 (ethyl alcohol control) n/a -15.51 0.30 8.33 -1.95
  • 74.
  • 76. The time Period and its corresponding EC 50 value Time Period EC 50 value Day 1 2.10 μg/mL Day 2 2.44 μg/mL Day 3 3.97 μg/mL Day 4 4.81 μg/mL
  • 78. The time period and its corresponding EC 50 value Time Period EC 50 value Day 1 10.0 μg/mL Day 2 77.7 μg/mL Day 3 83.8 μg/mL Day 4 >500 μg/mL
  • 80. The time period and its corresponding EC 50 value Time Period EC 50 value Day 1 2.10 μg/mL Day 2 2.44 μg/mL Day 3 3.97 μg/mL Day 4 4.81 μg/mL
  • 82. The time period and its corresponding EC 50 value Time Period EC 50 value Control (0µg/L) 109 μg/mL Treatment 1 (0.2µg/L) 98 μg/mL Treatment 2 (1.0µg/L) 168 μg/mL Treatment 3 (5.0µg/L) 128 μg/mL
  • 84. The time period and its corresponding EC 50 value Time Period EC 50 value Control (0µg/L) 46.2 μg/mL Treatment 1 (0.2µg/L) 68 μg/mL Treatment 2 (1.0µg/L) 183 μg/mL Treatment 3 (5.0µg/L) 162 μg/mL
  • 85. Discussion: Compare Marine to Freshwater Algae Time Period Marine Algae Species EC 50 values Isochrysis Nannochloropsis Rhodomonas Chaetocerus Tetraselmis 24hr 10.8 6.3 109 46.2 10.0 48hr 68.5 72 98 68 77.7 72hr 182 165 168 183 83.8 96hr 164 360 128 162 >500 Freshwater Algae Species L(E) 50 values Navicula pelliculosa Selenastrum capricornutum Scenedesmus subspicatus Skeletonema costatum Anabaena flosaquae 96hr 19.1 µg/L 4.46 µg/L 2. 8 µg/L > 66.0 µg/L 0.97 µg/L
  • 86.
  • 87. Discussion: Comparison of EC 50 and L(E) 50 Values of Other Organisms Time Period Marine Algae Species EC 50 values Isochryis galbana Nannochloropsis oculata Rhodomonas salina Chaetocerus gracilis Tetraselmis chuii 24hr 10.8 6.3 109 46.2 10.0 48hr 68.5 72 98 68 77.7 72hr 182 165 168 183 83.8 96hr 164 360 128 162 >500 Organisms L(E) 50 values Fish Seamonkeys Bacteria Danio rerio Oryzais latipes Artemia Staphylococci Pimephales promelas Lepomis macrochirus E. coli K. pueumoniae Pseudomonas aeruginosa < 300 µg/L 2000 µg/L 100-300 µg/L 260 µg/L 370 µg/L 5,000 µg/L 300,000-1,000,000 µg/L
  • 88.
  • 89.
  • 90. Discussion: Comparison of the EC 50 Values among the Algae Species Time Period Marine Algae Species EC 50 values Isochryis galbana Nannochloropsis oculata Rhodomonas salina Chaetocerus gracilis Tetraselmis chuii 24hr 10.8 6.3 109 46.2 10.0 48hr 68.5 72 98 68 77.7 72hr 182 165 168 183 83.8 96hr 164 360 128 162 >500
  • 91. Discusssion: Visual comparison of the EC 50 (µg/L) values
  • 92.
  • 93.
  • 94. Acknowledgements This research was supported, in part, by a grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration grant # NA17AE1626, Subcontract # 27-0629-017, through the Environmental Cooperative Science Center at Florida A&M University to Jackson State University. M. McHenry was supported through the National Institutes of Health funded Research Initiative for Scientific Enhancement (RISE) grant awarded to Jackson State University.