We plan to re-create Mumbai, India as the world's most fantastic city. The idea is to spread the word - probably raise support for the concept. Visit us on romf.org to read more.

1. Remaking of Mumbai Federation
www.romf.org remakingofmumbai@gmail.com Mayank Gandhi

2. Critical issues
Housing Infrastructure
Governance

3. Shortage
50,000 families
Pavement dwellers & migrants
Nil – Housing buffer stock

4. Proposed Rental housing projects in MMR
 Self-contained - 160 sq.ft. (15 sqm) carpet
 Plans all over the region to meet the demand
Rental housing

5. Slums
1.5 mn. families
7.5 mn. people
Low rise – High density
housing
No civic services
Sub standard living

6. Slums
Slum Redevelopment Authority - SRA
 Around 450 slum projects - 250,000 homes.
 Aiming for a slum-free Mumbai by 2015.

7.  10-15 km average speed
 Poor services
 Crumbling infrastructure
Infrastructure…present condition

8. Major INFRASTRUCTURE projects proposed
Free ways/Sea links
Metro

9. Suburban Monorail
Major INFRASTRUCTURE projects proposed

10. Inner city chaos
5,00,000 families
2.5 mn. people
Over 30,000 buildings
Old & dilapidated
Dangerous living conditions
Poor infrastructure

11. Need for redevelopment…Mumbai over the years
Removed the
incentive for
landlords to repair
and maintain their
buildings
Over 20,000
buildings built on
chawl style for
clerks and
workers in island
city
1969
Building repairs &
reconstruction act
1976
MHADA act
1986
Amendments
in MHADA
act
Tenant
co-operative
70% consent for
redevelopment.
1999
Reconstruction
policy
Incentive F.S.I to
developers
July 2005
Record rainfall
- Major disaster
Human &
property loss
2007
State Housing Policy
PPP, JV
Sector redev
High Demand for
housing and
increase in
population and
trade in island city
October 2005
Concept plan submitted to
Chief Minister by
Lalit Gandhi
March 2009
Cluster Development
policy
1949
Bombay Rent
control act
Post 1950
Pre -1940

12. Inner city infrastructure…
Close to collapse

13. Dilapidated
Building Conditions…
Dangerous

14. Average living space

16.  40 years - 2,750 minor & major instances of collapses.
 750 died
 1,600 injured
 Loss of Properties and Livelihood
 On the July 26th, 2005 heavy rains resulted in collapse
of 4 buildings and around 100 deaths
 This has triggered the formation of a citizen centric
NGO called the Remaking of Mumbai Federation

17. Managing Committee - RoMF
Late Shri. Lalit Gandhi,
Past President, MCHI
Founder chairman
Girsh Gokhale
Ex Mun. Comm,
Mumbai
Y P Trivedi
Hon. Rajya
Sabha Member
Padmashree Nana
Chudasama
World Chairman of
GIANTS
Anand Gupta
Ex Chairman, BAI
Adolf Tragler
Dir, SRS
Vice
Presidents
H.H Sri Sri Ravi
Master
Visionary
Justice P N Bhagwati,
Ex Chief Justice of
India
President
Mayank Gandhi,
Activist
Secretary
Darshan Gandhi
B.Tech, Civil, IIT - Bombay
Chairman
Jt. Coordinator
Krishan Khanna
Founder, i watch

18. Dr. Vijay Khole
Ex- VC Mum. Univ
Narayana Murthy
Chief Mentor -
Infosys
Dr. Snehalatha
Deshmukh
Ex- VC Mum Univ
Shashi
Prabhu
Architect
Advisory Council
Kaizer Rangwala
Rangwala Asso,
Los Angeles
Dr. P S Rana
Ex Chairman,
HUDCO
Dr. David Fisher
Dynamic Intl Ltd.,
Rome and
London
Sunil Shastri
Ex. Cabinet Min.
Mahender
Vasandani
M square, Illinois
Anil Hatkar
Lambda Alpha
Intl , US
Permanent invitees
Girish Bhagat
The EuroIndia Center
Members
A Jockin
(Presi- Nat’l Slum Dwellers Fed.)
Sharad Mahajan
(Architect)
V.K.J. Rane
(Ex. Md.-Ind Rly.Construction)
Jt. Secretary
Gurunath Dalvi
( President- Institute of Architects)
Vijay Kalantri
(Pres- All Indai Assn. of Industries)
Mahableshwar Morje
( Gen. Sec- Flat Owners Assn)
Shankar Desai
( Past Pres- Builders Assn. of India)
Vikas Narayan
(Vice Presi-Tenants Assn. of India)
Zoeb A Bootwala
(Pres. Sir JJ Marg Citizens Wel Assn)/
Treasurers
Vimal Punmiya
( Chairman-All India Biss. Council)
Muhammadli Patel
(Gen Sec- Fedn.of Assn of Maha)
Shashank Ninawe
( Prof- Raheja College of Archi)
S Dharmadhikari
( Pres- Ind. Soc. Structural Eng)
Yashwant Dalal
(President- Estate Agent’s Assn.)
Vinod Sampat
( Presi- Co-Op-Soc Resi Users & Welfare Assn.)
Ashok Gulati
(Realty expert)
Coordinator

19. Over 17,000 local members and
 Mumbai University
 The Indian Institute of Architects
 Sir J. J. College of Architecture
 Rizvi College of Architecture
 Old Building Landlord Welfare Association
 Citizen Forum for C Ward Development
 Federation of Assn. Of Maharashtra
 Indian Soc of Structural Engineers.
 The Inst. of Engineers (I)
 All India Business Council
 Indian Council of Foreign Trade
 All India Assn. Of Industries
 Maharashtra Soc. Welfare Assn.
 Indian Merchants' Chamber
 Indian Concrete Institute
 Mumbai District Co-op Housing Fedn Ltd
 Estate Agents Assn.
 Builders Assn. Of India
 Giants International
 Flat Owner's Assn.
 Slum Rehabilitation Soc.
 Tenants Assn. of India
Associations NGOs
Academic Institutions

20. COUNCIL ON TALL BUILDINGS
AND URBAN HABITAT (CTBUH)
To support RoMF in Remaking
Mumbai with Sector-by-Sector
redevelopment.
The agreement will help to bring
together all of the disciplines
involved in creating the urban
environment on a global basis.
RoMF has been appointed as the
country leader and will be in a
position to bring the best planners,
architects, developers & consultants
for rejuvenating Mumbai into a world
class city.
International tie-ups…

21. Name of Organisations Place Name of Organisations Place
Arup USA
Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of
Sciences Kuwait
The Blume Foundation USA Skidmore Owings & Merrill, L.L.P. USA
Bovis Lend Lease S.r.I. Tishman Speyer Properties USA
Davis Langdon LLP U.K Walter P Moore USA
DeSimone Consulting Engineers USA Omrania & Associates Saudi Arabia
Gale International USA RISE International USA
Illinois Institute of Technology, College of
Architecture USA Leslie E. Robertson Associates USA
KONE Oyj Finland
Rosenwasser/Grossman Consulting Engineers
P.C USA
NBBJ USA Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc. Canada
Samsung Corporation (Engineering &
Construction Korea Solomon Cordwell Buenz & Associates, Inc. USA
Schindler Elevator Corporation USA The Thornton Tomasetti Group USA
Schirmer Engineering Corporation USA Woods Bagot UK
WSP Group UK CPP, Inc. USA
American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. USA Dong Yang Structural Engineers Korea
Zuhair Fayez Partnership
Saud
Arabia Dubai Waterfront Dubai
Hongkong Land Ltd. HongKong T.R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn Bhd, Arkitek Malaysia
KLCC (Holdings) Berhad Malaysia Institute of Architectural Design
CTBUH Members
Cosentini Associates USA NORR Architects & Engineers Canada
CS Associates USA Palafox Associates Philippine
CTL Group USA Pan Arab Consulting Engineers Kuwait
Dar Al.Handasah (Shair and Partners) Egypt Pelli Clarke Pelli Architects Connectient
DeStefano + Partners Ltd. USA Plannungsgruppe Droge Baade Nagaraj Germany
Dunbar & Boardman UK STS Consultants Ltd. USA
Terry Farrell & Partners UK Taylor Thomson Whitting Pty.Ltd. Australia
Flack + Kurtz USA Tekla, Inc. USA
FXFOWLE Architects P.C. USA The Calvin Group, LLC USA
HP Konig, Heunisch and Partner Germany Traynor O’Toole Architects UK

22. RoMF
Mission: Save Mumbai – Make Mumbai
Objectives:
 Cluster development
 Deliberate planning process for the entire city of Mumbai
 Increase and augmentation of infrastructure
 Creation of housing stock for the poor.
 Transform Mumbai into a WORLD CLASS CITY.
 Replicate this process in all major cities of India and outside

23. Hong Kong, Singapore, Shanghai and many
other cities were in much worse shape than the
present Mumbai.
It is high time to muster strong political and
administrative will and by applying innovative
ideas, latest technology and the use of the
public- private partnership - remake Mumbai to
“A WORLD CLASS CITY”

24. 24
 Crammed population
Early Shanghai
 Poor infrastructure  Abysmal quality of life

25. 25
Shanghai 2006
 Block-by-block development  Strong political and administrative will

26. 26
Hong Kong in 1965
 Low Shanties  No open spaces
 Unplanned growth  Few green areas

27. 27
Hong Kong in 1980s

28. Hong Kong today

29. Singapore in 1972
 Crammed layout  Horizontal structure  No open space

30. Singapore today
 World class city  Sector by sector massive development
 FSI of 5-25

31. 2 redevelopment model
 Individual buildings – DCR 33(7)
 Clusters – DCR 33(9)
Housing policy for inner city redevelopment

32.  Purchase / development rights of existing buildings
 Agreements with tenants
 Removal of existing buildings to transit accommodation
 Clearing of space
 Constructing Rehab buildings
 Shifting tenants back
 Parallelly constructing free sale apartments along with all
infrastructure and sustainable measures
 Selling extra incentive area
Process of redevelopment

33. DCR 33 (7)
FSI of 2.5 or Rehab + Incentive, whichever is more
– 1 Property – 50% incentive
– 2-5 Properties – 60% incentive
– 6 or more Properties – 70% incentive

34. Individual building redevelopment
Further load on existing POOR INFRASTRUCTURE
Decrease in per capita OPEN SPACE, PARKING & AMENITIES
Shortage of WATER
Average travel speed – 6-8 kmph & bottle necks
Damage to CULTURAL HERITAGE
UNSUSTAINABLE model of development
Only feasible buildings get redeveloped

35. • Incentivizing redevelopment through cluster approach.
• Facilitate market oriented redevelopment strategy.
• Promote higher FSI to large cluster redevelopment.
• To transform the fractured development in to cohesive urban unit as laid down in Development
Plan
• Promote better living environment & living standards
• To facilitate development and proper maintenance of infrastructure
• To generate surplus tenements for rehabilitation of the occupiers who are on the master list of
MHADA
• MHADA will play the nodal role in the cluster approach
• MHADA shall be a signatory to all the agreements to provide greater acceptability and
credibility amongst the tenants and landlords.
Maharashtra State Housing Policy 2007
some excerpts of redevelopment
In order to accelerate the redevelopment of old and dilapidated buildings,
it is proposed to encourage redevelopment projects through joint ventures
in which MHADA along with the tenants, landlords and private developers
will come together for undertaking redevelopment of cluster

36. DCR 33 (9) – cluster redevelopment
FSI of 4 or Rehab + Incentive, whichever is more
– Area between 1 and 2 acres – 55% incentive
2 and 3 acres – 65% incentive
3 and 4 acres – 70% incentive
4 and 5 acres – 75% incentive
above 5 acres – 80% incentive

37. • PPP basis
• Cluster approach
• Self- financing scheme
• Inclusive process with win-win solutions
• Sustainability measures
• In-situ rehabilitation
• Transparent and accountable process
• Global best practices with local involvement
Principles of Cluster redevelopment

38. Advantages
Upgradation & augmentation of INFRASTRUCTURE
LIFE TIME MAINTENANCE of buildings - free of cost
INCLUSIVE APPROACH
Restoration of HERITAGE & RELIGIOUS buildings
FINANCIAL INCENTIVES to the building landlords
HOLISTIC PLANNING
Fast process of city REMAKING
SELF FINANCING model
WIN – WIN solution for all
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

39. as per new DCR 33(9)
Rehab component 100 % Min 300 sqft or equivalent
present area to each residential
tenement
Owner share 10% of Rehab component
Corpus Fund for main. 5% of Rehab component
Developer share 65% of Rehab component
80 %

40. Productivity
Value
Employment
Growth
Bio-Diversity
Recycling Clean Air
Bio-Capacity
Amenity
Public safety
Public service
Cultural
Identity
Power
Water
Infrastructure
Outside
The
Premises
Inside
The
Premises
SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT
Sustainable Development & the City

41. Sustainable Development & the City

42. Water management
(Usage Augmentation)
Rain
Harvesting
Bioswale
Storm water
Bath Sink
Laundry Dish water
1. Filters 2. Chemical
Treatments
Waste
water
to
Municipal
treatment
Evaporated
into Air
Absorbed into
ground
Marine release
Toilet & Urinal
Commercial
3. UV sterilizer
SOLID
Waste
Municipal
water
supply

43. Black water management
Micro pore
Filter
UV Radiation/
Ozone
Clean Pathogen
Free water
Landscape /
Irrigation
Black
water
Solid
Waste
Energy
( Back To Grid)
Methane
Reactor
H
H
H
H
C
Carbon
Dioxide
Result - 37 % savings

44. Alternative energy
Energy network
Waste 70%
Electricity
30%
Energy
Source
100%
Electricity
Electricity
Supply
Grid
Centralized
Electricity
Room
Loss 20%
Heat 50%
District
Hot water
Centralized
MechanicalR
oom
Supply to
Individual
Users
Utility Company
Power Generation
On-Site Ultra-
Efficient & Clean
Power Generation
On-Site
Renewable Power
Generation
End User
Utility
Cogeneration
Facility
Fuel Cells
Wind
Turbines
Photovoltaic
Arrays
Traditional
Result - 39 % savings

45. Landfill
Local collection and carriage
without separation
Garbage
containers
waste collection
Individual
Discharge
Without separation
Proposed
New Product to users Manufacturer
Production stream
Back to
Grid
Incinerator
center
Landfill
Central
trash yards
Diverter
Recyclable
waste
Rotating separator
Compactor &
Container
Pneumatic waste
Collection system
Dry waste
Wet waste
Non Recycled
waste
Traditional
Solid Waste Management

46. Existing cluster
Area Advantage
Vertical growth
Augmented infrastructure Parking, sewage
treatment, water recycling, waste
management
Public spaces
Public amenities –
 Temples, jain derasars, masjids, agiaries
 Existing new buildings, schools, heritage
structures, health centers etc will be
maintained and augmented.
Wide roads

47. Water (lpcd) < 100 < 80 >135 Water harvesting & recycling
* Values of Present & individual from diff sources & Cluster outcomes on RoMF’s pilot project master plan
Outcomes – Infrastructure matrix
Sewage bad worse
n
excellen
t
Water treatment
Parking bad worse
n
excellen
t
Multi-storied & offsite parking
Open & Play
acres/1000
0.03 margi
nal
0.6 (20
times)
Vertical development &
intermittent open
Humans:
Tree ratio
9:1 > 9:1 3.5:1 Huge open spaces & Vertical
gardens
Schools/disp
ensaries
less worse
n
excellen
t
Primary school & dispensaries
acc to popn’
Road
network
9-12% conge
stion
Upto
20%
Hierarchy & planned
Waste
disposal
worst worst excellen
t
In-situ segregation &
treatment
Renewable
Energies
nil nil excellen
t
Solar & Wind energy usage in
clusters
Present Individ
ual
Cluster
*
Processes in Cluster
development

48.  Single room tenement to 300 sq.ft house
 In-situ redevelopment
 Nearby transit
 Financial guarantees will be given along with penalty clause
 Two level Grievance Council consisting of ex-judges, ex-bureaucrats and eminent
citizens
 Corpus fund to ensure life time free maintenance.
 Revenue from extra parking areas, hosting of hoardings and hiring of community
halls for rehab buildings
 Convertible debenture to each tenant which will convert into equity
Tenant’s Advantage
Landlord’s advantage
 Fair compensation
 Convertible debenture to each tenant which will convert into equity

49. Traders and Shopkeepers advantage
 In-situ redevelopment
 No malls and super bazaars in the free sale component
 Shops in the ground floors with road frontage will be rehabilitated in the same way
 Rehabilitation in the last stage to minimise the loss of income
 Convertible debenture to each tenant which will convert into equity
 Increased work opportunities for laborers
 Dormitories with clean beds, kitchen and toilet blocks
 Separate hawking zones
 Back lanes in markets and shopping areas for loading and unloading.
 Increased public toilets and rest rooms.
Advantages for the hawkers and laborers

50. 50,000 crores INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT FUND
AFFORDABLE HOUSING for Lower & middle income groups
OUTCOMES - Housing & Infrastructure
>25,000 units Housing stock EWS & LIG
GOOD QUALITY housing for rehabilitated people
WORLD STANDARD LIFE QUALITY

51. MJ Market
Mumba Devi
Temple
Mosqu
e
S K Patil
Udyan
Mangaldas Market
Marine Lines
Station
Swadeshi Market
ROMF
 Total Area 233 acres
 Number of Buildings 2,
202
 Cessed Buildings 1,
777
 Population 96, 673
 Residential units 22,222
 Avg size 140 sq ft
 Commercial units 20,000
 Avg. size 150 sq ft
Night time: Day time
Cluster in C Ward…

52. Data mapping…

53. Various Clusters

54. Summary of clusters

55. Building details of every cluster

56. Details of every building

57. Hindu
Christian
Muslim
Parsi
Communities

58. 49% Residential
6-7% Single person that share
a place with other people
Age 22-58 male
3-4% Elderly
Age around 58-70
50-52% Couples
Age around male 24-55
female 23-50
32-35 %
Kids
2.5 / house
7% Servants
3% Widow
Age 45-58
Source: Various HH surveys by RoMF

59. 51% Commercial
10-15 % Office
1-2 % Doctor
30-32 % Paper-Printing
25-30 % Textile
2-3 % Restaurant
1-2 % Tea Shop
1 % Pan Shop
1 % Electronics
1,2 %Agent 25-30% Shop
2-3 % Gold
10 % Miscellaneous
Source: Various HH surveys by RoMF

60. Public Participation…
Old Building Landlords Welfare Association (OLWA)
Association formed for the cause of the landlords of dilapidated buildings in Mumbai, who are
suffering from various laws imposed under the Bombay Rent Control Act.
Citizens Forum for C Ward Development (CFCD)
A large group of eminent citizens of C ward who have come together to work constructively for
the redevelopment of its ward and is represented by a managing committee and a mohalla
committee consisting of representatives of each of the 129 mohallas
Federation of Associations of Maharashtra (FAM)
An apex body representing more than 750 associations/chambers of Trade, Transport and
Small Scale Industries from all over Maharashtra. FAM has been able to gain the confidence
and respect of the Trading community, since it has been trying to solve problems and genuine
grievances of business community when they are in difficulties
Building Representative Forum (BRF)
3 to 5 representatives from each building for discussions, opinions & changes in the master
planning and individual building design

61. Public outreach
Sharing the concept – 3 public mtgs of over 15000

62. Public outreach
Mohalla and street meetings for Sharing the concept

63. Public outreach
Public meetings to unveil plan and policies

64. Public outreach
Building wise meetings

65. Public outreach
Street and locality opinion forming

66. Public outreach
Business and commerce

67. Public outreach
Door to door suggestions

68. Public outreach
24 hrs free ambulance inaugurated by Dy Mayor and Ex- MP

69. Public outreach
Disaster Relief Cell

70. Public outreach
Involving global technical experts

71. Public outreach
Public seminars on various issues

72. Public outreach
Understanding the issues

73. Public outreach
Design studio with Indian and Int’l architecture students

74. Public outreach
Public exhibition on some works

75. monthly newsletter in 4 languages – over 22,000 copies

76. 3 Round table discussions on
1. Inner city redevelopment of India
2. Remaking Sustainable Cities in the Vertical Age
3. Remaking Sustainable Cities: Infrastructure & Finance

77. CTBUH 2010 Conference, 3rd – 5th Feb, Mumbai
“Remaking Sustainable Cities in the Vertical Age"
77 global speakers & 1100 delegates,
spanning 29 countries

78. Pilot project - 30 acres
Pilot project - 30 acres

79. Proposed 30 acres project in Chira bazar area

80. Project details…
30 acres
373
362
3,840
4,484
8,324
962
7,281
6,092
73.9%
83.7 %
Cluster area
Total buildings (including new,
temples etc)
Buildings under proposal
Residential tenements
Commercial tenements
Total tenements
Locked units
Net open premises
Consent received - 13th May 09
% of consents received
Consent % of open premises

81. CPMC - City Planning and Monitoring Committee
Chief Minister
Mayor & Dy. Mayor,
Leader of opposition
Members of various associations
Chambers of federation,
National & int’l developers,
Consultants & collaborators,
Planners, designers,
FI’s, FII’s etc
Development authorities/
Municipal corporations,
Public Works Dept.
Traffic & Transport authorities
Water supply and sewage
treatment agencies,
Telecom, electricity
Other Para-statal agencies
CUDC
Government
Undertaking
- State
- Local
Stakeholders
Advisory
Committee
Accountability,
Transparency
Project Mgnt
& Monitoring
Creation of
sectors
Survey &
Planning
Finance,
Environment
& Ecology
City Planning and
Monitoring Committee
( CPMC )
Sector by Sector
development
Scheme (SSDS)

82. CPMC – City Planning and Monitoring Committee
Public Private People Partnership for Regulating, Planning and Monitoring
• Formation of a City planning and monitoring
corporate through a SPV on a PPP basis
• Create mode of implementation by
Sector – by – Sector Development scheme
• Address all other categories of development
• Involve global and top quality professionals
• Create Financial Tools
• Create Accountability and transparency
structure through Corporate Governance
• Survey and Study
• Sectorial planning pertaining to old&
dilapidated buildings
• Pro-active facilitating
• Prequalification of Sector Developers
• Execution of social infrastructure
• Enabling laws / rules
• Rehousing of tenants, landlords etc
• Monitoring quality, time and aesthetics by
international project management firms
Concept
Objectives Functions

83. Do not doubt that a small group of thoughtful people could change
the world. Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.
- Margaret Mead