SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Debashish Bhattacharya á Jamie J. Cannone
Robin R. Gutell
Group I intron lateral transfer between red
and brown algal ribosomal RNA
Received: 12 February 2001 / Accepted: 26 April 2001 / Published online: 17 July 2001
Ó Springer-Verlag 2001
Abstract How group I introns originate in nuclear rib-
osomal (r)RNA genes is an important question in evo-
lutionary biology. Central to this issue is the multitude
of group I introns present in evolutionarily distantly
related plant, fungal, and protist lineages, together with
an understanding of their origin and lateral transfer
from one exon to another, between cell organelles, and
between cells. These introns vary considerably in pri-
mary and secondary structure; and their provenance
from a few or perhaps many mobile elements that have
spread in rRNAs is unknown. Here we show that a
novel lineage of group IC1 introns inserted at posi-
tion 516 (Escherichia coli gene numbering) in the small
subunit rRNA in bangiophyte red algae and a brown
alga (Aureoumbra lagunensis) are speci®cally related,
although their host cells are not. These bangiophyte and
Aureoumbra introns are the only known cases that have
a helical insertion in the P5b helix. The highly conserved
primary and secondary structure of the extra P5b helix
suggests that it is important, although its speci®c func-
tion is unknown. Our study attempts to understand the
origin and movement of these IC1 introns.
Keywords Group I intron á Stramenopiles á
Lateral transfer á Phylogeny
Introduction
Group I introns are a distinct class of RNA enzymes
that are characterized by a conserved RNA primary and
secondary structure essential for splicing and are often
capable of ``self-splicing'' (Kruger et al. 1982; Cech
1985). Clarifying the origin and evolutionary history of
group I introns helps us understand how these sequences
have persisted for billions of years and, more generally,
addresses the possible role(s) of catalytic RNAs in
modern cells. The sporadic and wide distribution of
group I introns in the nuclear-encoded small (SSU) and
large (LSU) subunit ribosomal (r)RNA and organellar
genes of green algae, red algae, fungi, ciliates, amoebae,
and other organisms (Cannone et al., unpublished data)
suggests that these sequences are highly successful
at invading and maintaining themselves in eukaryotic
genomes (Bhattacharya et al. 1994, 1996a; Turmel et al.
1995; Bhattacharya 1998; Nishida et al. 1998; Watanabe
et al. 1998; Suh et al. 1999; Friedl et al. 2000).
In this study, we use secondary structure and phylo-
genetic analyses to address the lateral transfer of group I
introns in nuclear rRNA. To approach this issue, unique
structural features of introns are tracked through evo-
lutionary time. We also use traditional phylogenetic
methods to determine the evolutionary relationships of
these introns and their host cells. Currently, there are
approximately 1,214 group I introns available in Gen-
Bank. Our analyses of these sequences [summarized
at the Comparative RNA web site (CRW), http://
www.rna.icmb.utexas.edu/] resulted in their classi®ca-
tion into ®ve major structural subgroups [Michel and
Westhof 1990 (subgroups A±D); Suh et al. 1999 (sub-
group E)]. Within the order Bangiales in the Rhodo-
phyta (red algae), IC1 introns at position 516 revealed a
unique insertion in the P5b helix, which is absent from
all other IC1 introns (Gutell and Cannone, unpublished
data). Subsequently, we found a group I intron in a
brown algal stramenopile, Aureoumbra lagunenesis, with
the same unusual insertion that, coincidentally, also
Curr Genet (2001) 40: 82±90
DOI 10.1007/s002940100227
Communicated by R.W. Lee
D. Bhattacharya (&)
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Iowa,
239 Biology Building, Iowa City, IA 52242-1324, USA
E-mail: dbhattac@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu
J.J. Cannone á R.R. Gutell
Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology,
University of Texas, 2500 Speedway, Austin,
TX 78712-1095, USA
occurred at position 516 in small subunit rRNA. This
collection of ``tagged'' 516 introns and the sequences for
the SSU rRNA in the host cells have presented us with
the opportunity to explore the lateral transfer of a group
I intron. There are two major scenarios that could
explain this situation:
1. Introns early. The 516 intron was present in the SSU
rRNA of the common ancestor of red and brown
algae and has been maintained only in the Bangiales
and Aureoumbra. This scenario would be supported
by a close evolutionary relationship between red and
brown algae, whereas a distant relationship would
support independent acquisition of the intron.
2. Introns late. The presence of the 516 intron in the
Bangiales and Aureoumbra is best explained by in-
dependent acquisition of the intron after the separa-
tion of red and brown algae. We used phylogenetic
analyses of introns and SSU rRNA coding regions to
address the origin of these 516 introns.
Materials and methods
Intron and rRNA sequences
The publicly available sequences analyzed here were retrieved from
GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/index.html), at
the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The rRNA and rRNA introns were usu-
ally identi®ed by searching for the words ``rRNA'' and ``introns'',
and for ``rRNA'' in the feature key ®eld in the Entrez web-
searching utility (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Entrez/). However,
we have utilized the BLAST utility (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
BLAST/) to identify some intron sequences that are similar to the
red algal rRNA intron sequences, but are not always annotated
properly in their GenBank entry. Although the boundaries for the
rRNA exons and introns are usually annotated properly, we have
independently determined the intron/exon borders.
Alignment and secondary structure models and diagrams
Secondary structure diagrams for the red and brown algal group I
introns were modeled from the current comparative structure
models for the IC1 introns (Michel and Westhof 1990; Damberger
and Gutell 1994; Gutell and Cannone, unpublished data). These
structural models are derived by comparative sequence analysis, a
method based on the simple premise that RNAs within the same
family (e.g., tRNA, group I intron) that have similar functions will
have similar secondary and tertiary structures (reviewed in Gutell
1996). The red and brown algal intron sequences were aligned with
the IC1 sequences, because these were the most similar in sequence
and structure. All sequences were manually aligned using the SUN
Microsystems UNIX-based alignment editor AE2 (T. Macke,
Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, Calif.) to maximize sequence
and structure identity, to maintain (when possible) previously
proposed base-pairings, and to minimize the number of insertion
and deletion events. Once the secondary structure model had been
determined, the computer version of the diagram was drawn with
the interactive SUN Microsystems UNIX-based, interactive
graphics program XRNA (B. Weiser and H. Noller, University of
California at Santa Cruz, Calif.).
Phylogenetic analyses
For the group I intron data, a set of 62 group IC1 and IE intron
sequences from nuclear (16S and 16S-like) SSU rRNA in green
algae, red algae, fungi, Acanthamoeba grini, and Naegleria spp.
were manually aligned, using primary and secondary structure
similarity to juxtapose homologous regions (e.g., Michel and
Westhof 1990; Bhattacharya et al. 1994; Damberger and Gutell
1994). An alignment with a total length of 4,523 characters, in-
cluding insertions in the di€erent introns, was submitted to a pair-
wise distance analysis, using the HKY-85 model (Hasegawa et al.
1985) with equal rates across sites and the transition/transversion
ratio=2. Missing data and gaps were excluded from each pair-wise
comparison. This distance matrix was used as input for neighbor-
joining tree-building. A total of 1,000 bootstrap replicates (Fel-
senstein 1985) were analyzed with the distance method. We also
used the Modeltest program (ver. 3.04; Posada and Crandall 1998)
to survey 56 possible models of DNA substitution, to identify the
model that best ®t the intron data. This analysis showed the general
time-reversible model (RodrõÂguez et al. 1990) with estimations of
nucleotide frequencies (A=0.244, C=0.251, G=0.271, T=0.234),
the shape parameter of the gamma distribution (a=0.764) to ac-
commodate rate variations across sites, and the proportion of in-
variant sites (0.016) that are unable to accept substitutions
(GTR+G+I) as best ®tting the intron data. The GTR+G+I
model was used to calculate bootstrap values (1,000 replicates) for
monophyletic groups identi®ed by the HKY-85 distance tree. In
this way, we had estimates of support for di€erent groups in the
intron tree, using evolutionary models that were either relatively
simple (HKY-85), or parameter-rich (GTR+G+I). The IE introns
were used to root the intron tree.
The complete SSU rRNA sequences from a broadly diverse set
of red algae and stramenopiles were also aligned, using conserved
secondary structures, and 1,581 nt that could be simultaneously
aligned in all the sequences were submitted to a distance analysis
using the HKY-85 model (as described above). Modeltest also
identi®ed the GTR+G+I model as best ®tting the rRNA data;
and so it was used in the distance bootstrap analysis (1,000 repli-
cates). The parameter value estimates for this data set were:
A=0.251, C=0.206, G=0.281, T=0.262, proportion of invariant
sites=0.359, a=0.548). These data were also analyzed with an
unweighted maximum parsimony method. Initial trees were built
stepwise with ten random sequence additions; and the trees were
rearranged with tree bisection/reconnection, to ®nd the most par-
simonious phylogeny. A total of 1,000 bootstrap replicates were
analyzed with this method. The stramenopile sequences were used
to root the SSU rRNA tree. All phylogenetic analyses were done
with PAUP* (ver. 4.0b8; Swo€ord 2001). The ®gures presented in
this text, along with other secondary structure diagrams, are
available at the web site http://www.rna.icmb.utexas.edu/PHYLO/
ALGINT and are referred to in this text as the CRW Algal Introns.
Results and Discussion
Secondary structure analysis of the 516 introns
An analysis of the group I introns at the online CRW
web site revealed that 59 bangiophytes in the mono-
phyletic red algal order Bangiales (Bangia and Porphyra
spp; MuÈ ller et al. 1998, 2001a; Oliveira and Bhattach-
arya 2000) contained a IC1 intron at SSU rRNA posi-
tion 516 with the following characteristic: they each had
an insertion in the P5b helix (see Fig. 1A,C) which is
absent from the other IC1 introns, except for an intron in
A. lagunensis (Fig. 1B, Table 1). The Aureombra group I
intron was also in subgroup C1, had the P5b insertion,
and mapped to the 516 site in SSU rRNA. Detailed
analysis of the P5b helix provided strong evidence for its
homology in the red and brown algal 516 introns. The
insertion was conserved in size (19 nucleotides) and the
83
tetraloop hairpin sequence at position 156:9±12
(Fig. 1D) showed high identity (5¢-GYAA-3¢) to one of
the canonical hairpin tetraloop sequences initially iden-
ti®ed in 16S rRNA (Woese et al. 1990). All of the base
pair positions have some underlying variation, and they
all contain G:C, A:U, or G:U base pairs in all of the
sequences with this insertion. The three base pairs with
the purest covariance are 3:18, 7:14, and 8:13 (see dark
boxes in Fig. 1D, Table 2). Taken together, these ob-
servations were consistent with a single origin of the P5b
insertion and, by extension, of the 516 introns contain-
ing the extra helix. The pattern of sequence conservation
of the P5b helix also suggested that it is involved in a
RNA±RNA tertiary structure interaction within the
P5abc subdomain (Cate et al. 1996; Doherty et al. 1999;
Doherty and Doudna 2000). Tetraloops often dock into
stem-loop structures in other regions of RNA. An ex-
ample of such an interaction is between domains 5 and 1
of group II introns (Abramovitz and Pyle 1997). The
conserved nature of such higher-order interactions also
generally requires that the helices capped by tetraloops
be of a ®xed length (Hedenstierna et al. 2000), as found
in the P5b insertions (see Fig. 1D). Regardless of its
speci®c role, upon establishment, the helix has appar-
ently been under strong selective constraint and has not
been lost in any of the 31 publicly available introns at
position 516 in the SSU rRNA that have been reported
from the Bangiales or from Aureoumbra.
To determine whether other publicly available group
I introns, none of which apparently contain the P5b
insertion described here, may share a close evolutionary
relationship with the Bangiales and Aureoumbra
84
516 introns, we used the BLAST program (BLASTN
ver. 2.1.2; Altschul et al. 1997) to search for other intron
sequences with signi®cant sequence identity with the
Aureoumbra intron. This analysis identi®ed introns in
two strains of the lobose amoeba, Acanthamoeba grini
(GenBank S81337, U02540), with a 95% identity over a
48-bp sequence. Intrigued by this result, both Acanth-
amoeba intron sequences (strains ATCC30731, H37)
were included in our intron alignment; and secondary
structure models were developed. The Acanthamoeba
introns also interrupt the SSU rRNA at the 516 site,
although they each lack the insertion in the P5b helix
(CRW Algal Introns). The Acanthamoeba introns,
however, share many secondary structure features in
common with IC1 introns, such as the nine conserved
helical domains shown in Fig. 1A, and can conclusively
be classi®ed in this group (for details, see Michel and
Westhof 1990; Suh et al. 1999).
To put the ®nding of the P5b insertion in perspective,
of the approximately 1,214 publicly available group I
introns (350 of which are in subgroup IC1), approxi-
mately 772 of them occur in SSU and LSU rRNA; and
nearly 600 of these introns interrupt 35 di€erent SSU
rRNA sites. The SSU rRNA sites with the largest
number of introns are 1506 (123 introns), 516 (92 in-
trons), and 943 (90 introns). Approximately one-half of
the 516 introns are in subgroup IC1, whereas the other
half are in the IE subgroup. In the entire group I intron
data set, only the Bangiales and Aureoumbra IC1
516 introns contain the P5b insertion. Thus, this inser-
tion associates these two sets of introns and suggests that
they are speci®cally related to one another. To resolve
the evolutionary relationships of these introns, we re-
Table 1 List of organisms containing the inserted helix in the P5b region of the IC1 516 introns. GenBank accession numbers are listed at
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Organism Strain/isolate GenBank accession number
Aureoumbra lagunensis U40258
Bangia atropurpurea D88387
B. fuscopurpurea AF342745
Porphyra carolinensis AF133792
P. dentata Isolate Koga Fukuoka AB013183
P. haitanensis AB015795
P. katadae Isolate Kawatana Yamaguchi AB013184
P. leucosticta (Baltic) AF342746
P. lilliputiana AF136424
P. onoi AB015794
P. pseudolinearis Isolate Tohaku Tottori AB013185
Porphyra sp. Isolate GRB108 AF136420
Porphyra sp. Isolate RAK049 AF136425
Porphyra sp. Isolate Shimonoseki Yamaguchi AB013182
Porphyra sp. Strain BRU107 AF136418, AF136419
P. suborbiculata AB015796
P. suborbiculata Isolate Kawatana Yamaguchi AB013180
P. tenera Isolate Kawaura Kumamoto AB013176
P. tenera Isolate Matsukawa Fukushima; strain Matsukawa-3 AB029883
P. tenera Isolate Matsukawa Fukushima; strain Matsukawa-4 AB029884
P. tenera Isolate Shinwa Kumamoto AB013175
P. tenera Isolate Shinwa Kumamoto; strain Kawaura-4 AB029881
P. tenera Isolate Shinwa Kumamoto; strain Shinwa-2 AB029879
P. tenera Isolate Shinwa Kumamoto; strain Shinwa-3 AB029880
P. tenera Strain T-1 D86237
P. tenera Strain TU-3 D86236
P. tenera Strain T8 AB000964
P. tenuipedalis AB015797
P. yezoensis D79976
P. yezoensis Isolate Hakodate Hokkaido AB013177
P. yezoensis Isolate Ogatsu Miyagi AB013178
Fig. 1A±D Analysis of intron secondary structures. A Compara-
tive secondary structure model for the group IC1 intron at
position 516 in the small subunit (SSU) rRNA of Bangia
atropurpurea (GenBank D88387), drawn according to the conven-
tions of Cech et al. (1994). The 5¢ and 3¢ splice junctions are marked
with arrows, as are the locations of the pairing segments P1±P9 and
the internal guide sequence (IGS). A portion of P2.1 marked a is
shown as the primary structure and has not been folded in this
model. B The secondary structure model of the Aureoumbra
lagunensis intron (U40258). C Comparison of the P5a±c domains in
the 516 introns in B. fuscopurpurea (AF342745), Porphyra leucost-
icta (AF342746), and Tetrahymena thermophila (J01235). D
Alignment of the P5b region, including the insertion. Base-pairings
in helices are identi®ed in the boxed regions; and the insertion is
identi®ed by the bold boxes. The T. thermophila large subunit
rRNA group I intron is used as the reference for these
comparisons. These secondary structure ®gures, including the
T. thermophila, Acanthamoeba spp, and all the red and brown algal
intron diagrams we have determined for sequences that are publicly
available, can be accessed at our comparative RNA web site
(http://www.rna.icmb.utexas.edu/) and at http://www.rna.icmb.ut-
exas.edu/PHYLO/ALGINT/
b
85
constructed the phylogeny of the 516 introns, other SSU
rRNA introns, and the host cells that contain them,
using more traditional phylogenetic methods.
Test for mutational saturation of introns
Before embarking on phylogenetic analyses with the
group I intron sequences, we wanted to ®rst establish
that they encoded a signi®cant phylogenetic signal. To
do this, a data set of 62 sequences that spanned the di-
versity of IC1 and IE intron SSU rRNA insertion sites
(see Figs. 2, 3) was used to determine the extent of su-
perimposed substitutions. Uncorrected distances were
plotted versus those corrected with the HKY-85 model
to detect mutational saturation with regard to trans-
versions and transitions (see Daugbjerg and Andersen
1997; Lopez et al. 1999). In this analysis, the bending of
the line at higher, uncorrected distances indicates mu-
tational saturation (Moritz et al. 1992). The plots pre-
sented in Fig. 2 suggest that the group I introns encode a
signi®cant phylogenetic signal. Transversions show a
minor level of mutational saturation, whereas transi-
tions become more rapidly saturated as intron sequence
divergence increases. One obviously cannot compare
these group I introns to ``workhorse'' molecular markers
such as rRNA coding regions, in terms of utility across a
broad phylogenetic spectrum. The introns often have 4±
10 times greater rates of sequence divergence (Bhat-
tacharya et al. 1996b). Nonetheless, these sequences
contain a phylogenetic signal that can be used to esti-
mate a group I intron evolutionary tree.
Phylogenetic analysis of introns and host cells
To test the monophyly of the Bangiales and Aureoumbra
516 introns developed by the comparison of the intron
secondary structure features, we ®rst estimated a phy-
logeny of the IC1 and IE introns from a wide variety of
algae and protists. The preliminary distance analysis,
which included 322 IC1 and 101 IE introns in nuclear
SSU and LSU rRNA demonstrated a speci®c evolu-
tionary relationship between the Acanthamoeba, Aureo-
umbra, and red algal 516 introns within the IC1 cluster
(data not shown). This group was distinct from all other
IC1 introns and all other publicly available introns at
the 516 site, i.e., those in Naegleria spp and the IE
516 introns. Knowing this, we reduced the data set to
62 SSU rRNA introns for a more detailed analysis.
The distance tree (HKY-85 model) inferred from the
reduced data set of group I introns provides strong
support (96% bootstrap value) for the monophyly of the
Acanthamoeba, Bangiales, and Aureoumbra IC1 introns
at position 516, the early divergence of the Acanth-
amoeba introns within this clade (86% bootstrap sup-
port), and the distant evolutionary relationship of these
introns to the 516 introns in the IE group (Fig. 3). The
Naegleria spp. 516 introns are positioned at the base of
the IC1 516 intron clade without bootstrap support. It
is, therefore, unclear whether the Naegleria introns are
monophyletic with the other 516 introns in subgroup
IC1. Interestingly, the IC1 subgroup also includes the
1506 SSU rRNA intron in the Bangiales and one mem-
ber of the derived red algal subclass Florideophycidae
(Hildenbrandia rubra; Ragan et al. 1993). The Bangiales
Fig. 2 Plots of uncorrected
pair-wise substitutions ver-
sus values corrected for
multiple hits (HKY-85
model; Hasegawa et al.
1985) for the group I introns
included in the phylogeny
shown in Fig. 3. Transitions
and transversions are studied
separately. In this analysis,
the bending of the line at
higher uncorrected distances
indicates mutational satura-
tion (Moritz et al. 1992)
Table 2 Base-pair frequencies for the inserted helix in P5b found in
the red and brown algae. Data are presented for the 31 publicly
available sequences containing this inserted helix (30 red algae,
1 brown alga, see Table 1). Base-pairs refer to the ``insertion
numbers'' shown in Fig. 1D. For each base-pair, ± represents a
combination which is not present at that base-pair. In the Notes, A,
B, and C refer to the marked base-pairs in Fig. 1D
Base-pair G:C C:G A:U U:A G:U U:G Notes
03:18 96.8% ± 3.2% ± ± ± A
04:17 16.1% ± 71.0% ± 12.9% ±
05:16 38.7% ± 6.5% 3.2% 51.6% ± B
06:15 ± 96.8% ± ± ± 3.2%
07:14 96.8% ± ± 3.2% ± ± C
08:13 3.2% ± 96.8% ± ± ±
86
are postulated to be the sister group of the Florid-
eophycidae (Oliveira and Bhattacharya 2000; MuÈ ller
et al. 2001b), a hypothesis that is supported by the
presence of the 1506 intron in only these red algae. We
presume here that the common ancestor of the Bangi-
ales/Florideophycidae likely contained the 1506 intron.
Bootstrap-distance analysis of the 516 introns with the
GTR+G+I model provided similar results to the
HKY-85 model. The monophyly of the IC1 introns at
position 516 of Acanthamoeba, Bangiales, and Aureo-
umbra was strongly supported (96%), although there
Fig. 3 Phylogeny of IC1 and IE introns interrupting the nuclear
SSU rRNA of di€erent eukaryotes. This tree was built with
neighbor-joining, using a matrix of corrected distances (HKY-85
model). Bootstrap values (1,000 replications) are shown at the
branches. The values shown below the branches result from a
distance bootstrap analysis (1,000 replications), using the
GTR+G+I model. Only values ³50% are shown. The rRNA
intron insertion sites are indicated. The tree has been rooted on the
branch leading to the IE introns. GenBank accession numbers are
shown (in parentheses) for each intron sequence. The group IC1
introns at position 516 that contain the P5b insertion are shown in
bold
87
was again no support found for the inclusion of the
Naegleria spp. 516 introns within this clade.
Given this phylogenetic framework for the group I
introns at SSU rRNA site 516, we studied the phylogeny
of the host cells containing these introns. Analysis of the
SSU rRNA in red algae and stramenopiles showed that
taxa containing the 516 intron are evolutionarily dis-
tantly related (Fig. 4). Recent phylogenetic analyses of
more extensive data sets also suggested that the red algae
share a most recent common ancestry with the green
algae and land plants (Burger et al. 1999; Moreira et al.
2000). None of the green algae and land plants, however,
contain an IC1 intron at position 516. The strameno-
piles are often allied with alveolate protists, Acanth-
amoeba spp. are members of the Mycetozoa (a sister
group of fungi/animals), and Naegleria (Heterolobosea)
is a sister group of the Euglenozoa (e.g., Baldauf et al.
2000; Van de Peer et al. 2000). There is, therefore, no
direct evidence to support a close evolutionary rela-
tionship between red algae, brown algae, acanthame-
bids, and Naegleria spp. The most parsimonious
explanation for the close relationship of the IC1
516 introns, whereas the host cells containing them are
not closely related, is that the intron was independently
inserted into the homologous SSU rRNA site in the
Bangiales, Aureoumbra, Acanthamoeba, and Naegleria
(i.e., introns late). An observation that is consistent with
this hypothesis is that, of 373 stramenopile SSU rRNA
coding regions that have been determined (organism
names and GenBank accession numbers available at
CRW-algal introns), only the relatively late-diverging
Aureoumbra (Pelagophyceae) contains the IC1 516 in-
tron (see Fig. 4). To explain this distribution in terms of
introns early, one would need to invoke the non-parsi-
monious hypothesis of widespread intron loss in all
stramenopiles, except for the relatively late-diverging
Aureoumbra (see Fig. 4). Furthermore, the 516 intron is
limited to and sporadically distributed in the Bangiales
within the Rhodophyta; and it is only found in three
closely related acanthamebids of about 61 nuclear SSU
rRNA sequences of Acanthamoeba strains/species that
are currently available in GenBank (organism names
and GenBank accession numbers available at CRW
Algal Introns).
Another fascinating possibility for the origin of the
Aureoumbra IC1 516 intron is through symbiotic gene
Fig. 4 Phylogeny of selected red algae (Rhodophytes) and stra-
menopiles, based on SSU rRNA sequence comparisons. This tree
was built with neighbor-joining, using a matrix of corrected
distances (HKY-85 model). Bootstrap values (1,000 replications)
are shown above the branches on the left of the slash-marks. The
values shown on the right of the slash-marks result from a distance
bootstrap analysis (1,000 replications) using the GTR+G+I
model. Bootstrap values shown below the branches are derived
from an unweighted maximum parsimony analysis (1,000 replica-
tions). Only values ³50% are shown. The Bangiales and Aureoum-
bra are shown in bold. GenBank accession numbers are indicated
(in parentheses) for each SSU rRNA sequence
88
transfer. It is now generally believed that the plastid of
photosynthetic stramenopiles has arisen through a single
secondary (eukaryotic) symbiosis involving a red alga
(Douglas et al. 1991; Bhattacharya and Medlin 1995,
1998; Daugbjerg and Andersen 1997; Oliveira and
Bhattacharya 2000). It is, therefore, conceivable that the
Aureoumbra intron may trace its origin to an intron in
the rRNA gene of the red algal secondary symbiont. The
intron could have been transferred from the symbiont
nucleus to that of the stramenopile prior to the elimi-
nation of the red algal nuclear genome. However, an
observation that argues against this scenario is that, as
stated above, only Aureoumbra (of the many nuclear
SSU rRNA sequences that have been determined from
photosynthetic stramenopiles) contains an IC1 intron at
position 516 in the SSU rRNA. If the intron was present
in the photosynthetic ancestor of all stramenopiles, then
it must have been lost in all of these taxa, except for the
relatively late-diverging Aureoumbra.
In conclusion, our analyses provide clear insights into
the origin of the IC1 introns at the 516 site of SSU
rRNA. The host-cell phylogenetic data suggest that it is
unlikely that this intron was vertically inherited from the
common ancestor of the red algae, brown algae,
acanthamebids, and Naegleria spp., because these lin-
eages do not share a speci®c evolutionary relationship.
This hypothesis is supported by the restricted distribu-
tion of the intron in each of the host-cell lineages. The
intron phylogeny shows that the IC1 516 intron is evo-
lutionarily distantly related to the IE 516 intron,
supporting independent intron insertions into the ho-
mologous SSU rRNA site. The intron tree also provides
strong support for the monophyly of the IC1 516 intron
containing the insertion in helix P5b within the Bangiales
and Aureoumbra. This group also includes the Acanth-
amoeba 516 intron that lacks the insertion. The Naegleria
spp 516 introns are only distantly related to this clade.
Taken together, these data are consistent with the
second scenario that the Bangiales and Aureoumbra IC1
516 introns were acquired after the separation of the red
and brown algal lineages. We suggest this intron has
been inserted independently into the SSU rRNA of the
Bangiales, into a single stramenopile brown alga,
Aureoumbra, and into derived members of the genera
Acanthamoeba and Naegleria. Finally, our data suggest
not only that lateral transfer may establish new intron
lineages in di€erent organisms but also that, over time,
these sequences may evolve into distinct secondary
structure variants (i.e., containing the P5b helix inser-
tion), perhaps re¯ecting selection pressure to adapt to
the novel splicing environment. The IC1 introns at po-
sition 516 in the SSU rRNA may, therefore, be a valu-
able example of how novel intron groups are created
through the dual process of lateral transfer followed by
rapid secondary structure evolution. In this regard, the
P5b insertion has unambiguously marked the intron in
the Bangiales and Aureoumbra and has allowed us to
identify these homologous introns in evolutionarily di-
vergent protists. Detailed analysis of group I intron
secondary structure promises, therefore, to provide an
important source of comparative data to elucidate
intron origin and evolution.
Acknowledgements D.B. was supported by grants from the Carver
Foundation. R.R.G. was supported by research grant NIH-
GM48207 and start-up funds from the University of Texas, Insti-
tute for Cellular and Molecular Biology.
References
Abramovitz DL, Pyle AM (1997) Remarkable morphological
variability of a common RNA folding motif: the GNRA
tetraloop±receptor interaction. J Mol Biol 266:493±506
Altschul SF, Madden TL, SchaÈ €er AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller
W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new
generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids
Res 25:3389±3402
Baldauf S, Roger AJ, Wenk-Siefert I, Doolittle WF (2000) A
kingdom-level phylogeny of eukaryotes based on combined
protein data. Science 290:972±977
Bhattacharya D (1998) The origin and evolution of protist group I
introns. Protist 149:113±122
Bhattacharya D, Medlin L (1995) The phylogeny of plastids: a
review based on comparisons of small subunit ribosomal RNA
coding regions. J Phycol 31:489±498
Bhattacharya D, Medlin L (1998) Algal phylogeny and the origin
of land plants. Plant Physiol 116:9±15
Bhattacharya D, Surek B, RuÈ sing M, Damberger S, Melkonian M
(1994) Group I introns are inherited through common ancestry
in the nuclear-encoded rRNA of Zygnematales (Charophy-
ceae). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:9916±9920
Bhattacharya D, Friedl T, Damberger S (1996a) Nuclear-encoded
rDNA group I introns: origin and phylogenetic relationships of
insertion site lineages in the green algae. Mol Biol Evol 13:978±
989
Bhattacharya D, Damberger S, Surek B, Melkonian M (1996b)
Primary and secondary structure analyses of the rDNA group I
introns of the Zygnematales (Charophyta). Curr Genet 29:282±
286
Burger G, Saint-Louis D, Gray MW, Lang BF (1999) Complete
sequence of the mitochondrial DNA of the red alga Porphyra
purpurea: cyanobacterial introns and shared ancestry of red and
green algae. Plant Cell 11:1675±1694
Cate JH, Gooding AR, Podell E, Zhou K, Golden BL, Kundrot
CE, Cech TR, Doudna JA (1996) Crystal structure of a group I
ribozyme domain: principles of RNA packing. Science
273:1678±1685
Cech TR (1985) Self-splicing RNA: implications for evolution. Int
Rev Cytol 93:3±22
Cech TR, Damberger SH, Gutell RR (1994) Representation of the
secondary and tertiary structure of group I introns. Nat Struct
Biol 1:273±280
Damberger SH, Gutell RR (1994) A comparative database of
group I intron structures. Nucleic Acid Res 22:3508±3510
Daugbjerg N, Andersen RA (1997) Phylogenetic analyses of the
rbcL sequences from haptophytes and heterokont algae suggest
their chloroplasts are unrelated. Mol Biol Evol 14:1242±1251
Doherty EA, Doudna JA (2000) Ribozyme structures and mecha-
nisms. Annu Rev Biochem 69:597±615
Doherty EA, Herschlag D, Doudna JA (1999) Assembly of an
exceptionally stable RNA tertiary interface in a group I ribo-
zyme. Biochemistry 38:2982±2990
Douglas SE, Murphy CA, Spencer DF, Gray MW (1991) Molec-
ular evidence that cryptomonad algae are evolutionary chima-
eras of two phylogenetically distinct eukaryotes. Nature
350:148±151
Felsenstein J (1985) Con®dence intervals on phylogenies: an
approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783±791
89
Friedl T, Besendahl A, Pfei€er P, Bhattacharya D (2000) The
distribution of group I introns in lichen algae suggests that
lichenization facilitates intron lateral transfer. Mol Phylogenet
Evol 14:342±352
Gutell RR (1996) Comparative sequence analysis and the structure
of 16S and 23S rRNA. In: Zimmermann RA, Dahlberg AE
(eds) Ribosomal RNA: structure, evolution, processing, and
function in protein biosynthesis. CRC Press, Boca Raton,
pp 111±128
Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T (1985) Dating of the human±ape
splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol
Evol 22:160±174
Hedenstierna KO, Siefert JL, Fox GE, Murgola EJ (2000) Co-
conservation of rRNA tetraloop sequences and helix length
suggests involvement of the tetraloops in higher-order interac-
tions. Biochimie 82:221±227
Kruger K, Grabowski PJ, Zaug AJ, Sands J, Gottschling DE, Cech
TR (1982) Self-splicing RNA: autoexcision and autocyclization
of the ribosomal RNA intervening sequence of Tetrahymena.
Cell 31:147±157
Lopez P, Forterre P, Philippe H (1999) The root of the tree of life in
the light of the covarion model. J Mol Evol 49:496±508
Michel F, Westhof E (1990) Modelling the three-dimensional ar-
chitecture of group I catalytic introns based on comparative
sequence analysis. J Mol Biol 216:585±610
Moreira D, Le Guyader H, Philippe H (2000) The origin of red
algae and the evolution of chloroplasts. Nature 405:69±72
Moritz C, Schneider CJ, Wake DB (1992) Evolutionary relation-
ships within the Ensatina eschscholtzii complex con®rm the ring
species interpretation. Syst Biol 41:273±291
MuÈ ller KM, Sheath RG, Vis ML, Crease J, Cole KM (1998) Bi-
ogeography and systematics of Bangia (Bangiales, Rhodophyta)
based on the rubisco spacer, rbcL gene and 18S rRNA gene
sequences and morphometric analyses. 1. North America.
J Phycol 37:195±207
MuÈ ller KM, Cannone JJ, Gutell RR, Sheath RG (2001a) A struc-
tural and phylogenetic analysis of the Group IC1 introns in the
order Bangiales (Rhodophyta). Mol Biol Evol 18(8) (in press)
MuÈ ller KM, Oliveira MC, Sheath RG, Bhattacharya D (2001b)
Ribosomal DNA phylogeny of the Bangiophycidae (Rhodo-
phyta) and the origin of secondary plastids. Am J Bot 88(8) (in
press)
Nishida K, Suzuki S, Kimura Y, Nomura N, Fujie M, Yamada T
(1998) Group I introns found in Chlorella viruses: biological
implications. Virology 15:319±326
Oliveira M, Bhattacharya D (2000) Phylogeny of the Bang-
iophycidae (Rhodophyta) and the secondary endosymbiotic
origin of algal plastids. Am J Bot 87:482±492
Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of
DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817±818
Ragan MA, Bird CJ, Rice EL, Singh RK (1993) The nuclear 18S
ribosomal RNA gene of the red alga Hildenbrandia rubra
contains a group I intron. Nucleic Acids Res 21:3898
RodrõÂguez F, Oliver JF, MarõÂn A, Medina JR (1990) The general
stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J Theor Biol
142:485±501
Suh S-O, Jones KG, Blackwell M (1999) A group I intron in the
nuclear small subunit rRNA gene of Cryptendoxyla hypophloia,
an ascomycetous fungus: evidence for a new major class of
group I introns. J Mol Evol 48:493±500
Swo€ord DL (2001) PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsi-
mony, ver. 4.0b8. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
Turmel M, Coà te V, Otis C, Mercier J-P, Gray MW, Lonergan KM,
Lemieux C (1995) Evolutionary transfer of ORF-containing
group I introns between di€erent subcellular compartments
(chloroplast and mitochondrion). Mol Biol Evol 12:533±545
Van de Peer Y, Baldauf SL, Doolittle WF, Meyer A (2000) An
updated and comprehensive rRNA phylogeny of (crown) eu-
karyotes based on rate-calibrated evolutionary distances. J Mol
Evol 51:565±576
Watanabe KI, Ehara M, Inagaki Y, Ohama T (1998) Distinctive
origins of group I introns in the COXI genes of three green
algae. Gene 213:1±7
Woese CR, Winker S, Gutell RR (1990) Architecture of ribosomal
RNA: constraints on the sequence of tetra-loops. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 87:8467±8471
90

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 7: rRNA PCR and Major Groups
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 7: rRNA PCR and Major Groups Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 7: rRNA PCR and Major Groups
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 7: rRNA PCR and Major Groups Jonathan Eisen
 
UC Davis EVE161 Lecture 18 by @phylogenomics
 UC Davis EVE161 Lecture 18 by @phylogenomics UC Davis EVE161 Lecture 18 by @phylogenomics
UC Davis EVE161 Lecture 18 by @phylogenomicsJonathan Eisen
 
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 3: Woese and the Tree of Life
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 3: Woese and the Tree of LifeMicrobial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 3: Woese and the Tree of Life
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 3: Woese and the Tree of LifeJonathan Eisen
 
American Gut Project presentation at Masaryk University
American Gut Project presentation at Masaryk UniversityAmerican Gut Project presentation at Masaryk University
American Gut Project presentation at Masaryk Universitymcdonadt
 
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 14: Metagenomics
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 14: MetagenomicsMicrobial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 14: Metagenomics
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 14: MetagenomicsJonathan Eisen
 
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 17: Genomes from Uncultured
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 17: Genomes from UnculturedMicrobial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 17: Genomes from Uncultured
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 17: Genomes from UnculturedJonathan Eisen
 
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 5
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 5Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 5
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 5Jonathan Eisen
 
UC Davis EVE161 Lecture 15 by @phylogenomics
UC Davis EVE161 Lecture 15 by @phylogenomicsUC Davis EVE161 Lecture 15 by @phylogenomics
UC Davis EVE161 Lecture 15 by @phylogenomicsJonathan Eisen
 
"Cell", article entitled ""Heroes of CRISPR"
"Cell", article entitled ""Heroes of CRISPR""Cell", article entitled ""Heroes of CRISPR"
"Cell", article entitled ""Heroes of CRISPR"Lynsey Wiggins
 
RNA-guided Cas9-induced mutagenesis in tobacco
RNA-guided Cas9-induced mutagenesis in tobaccoRNA-guided Cas9-induced mutagenesis in tobacco
RNA-guided Cas9-induced mutagenesis in tobaccoStefanie Pencs
 
EveMicrobial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 9
EveMicrobial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 9EveMicrobial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 9
EveMicrobial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 9Jonathan Eisen
 
EVE161: Microbial Phylogenomics - Class 6 - Tree of Life Example
EVE161: Microbial Phylogenomics - Class 6 - Tree of Life ExampleEVE161: Microbial Phylogenomics - Class 6 - Tree of Life Example
EVE161: Microbial Phylogenomics - Class 6 - Tree of Life ExampleJonathan Eisen
 
EVE161: Microbial Phylogenomics - Class 3 - Woese and the Tree of Life
EVE161: Microbial Phylogenomics - Class 3 - Woese and the Tree of LifeEVE161: Microbial Phylogenomics - Class 3 - Woese and the Tree of Life
EVE161: Microbial Phylogenomics - Class 3 - Woese and the Tree of LifeJonathan Eisen
 
An Evolutionarily Conserved Long Noncoding RNA TUNA Controls Pluripotency and...
An Evolutionarily Conserved Long Noncoding RNA TUNA Controls Pluripotency and...An Evolutionarily Conserved Long Noncoding RNA TUNA Controls Pluripotency and...
An Evolutionarily Conserved Long Noncoding RNA TUNA Controls Pluripotency and...Zach Rana
 
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 15: Shotgun Metagenomics
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 15: Shotgun Metagenomics Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 15: Shotgun Metagenomics
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 15: Shotgun Metagenomics Jonathan Eisen
 
Transposable elements of Agavoideae
Transposable elements of AgavoideaeTransposable elements of Agavoideae
Transposable elements of AgavoideaeKate Hertweck
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 7: rRNA PCR and Major Groups
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 7: rRNA PCR and Major Groups Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 7: rRNA PCR and Major Groups
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 7: rRNA PCR and Major Groups
 
UC Davis EVE161 Lecture 18 by @phylogenomics
 UC Davis EVE161 Lecture 18 by @phylogenomics UC Davis EVE161 Lecture 18 by @phylogenomics
UC Davis EVE161 Lecture 18 by @phylogenomics
 
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 3: Woese and the Tree of Life
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 3: Woese and the Tree of LifeMicrobial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 3: Woese and the Tree of Life
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 3: Woese and the Tree of Life
 
American Gut Project presentation at Masaryk University
American Gut Project presentation at Masaryk UniversityAmerican Gut Project presentation at Masaryk University
American Gut Project presentation at Masaryk University
 
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 14: Metagenomics
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 14: MetagenomicsMicrobial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 14: Metagenomics
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 14: Metagenomics
 
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 17: Genomes from Uncultured
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 17: Genomes from UnculturedMicrobial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 17: Genomes from Uncultured
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 17: Genomes from Uncultured
 
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 5
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 5Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 5
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 5
 
UC Davis EVE161 Lecture 15 by @phylogenomics
UC Davis EVE161 Lecture 15 by @phylogenomicsUC Davis EVE161 Lecture 15 by @phylogenomics
UC Davis EVE161 Lecture 15 by @phylogenomics
 
Sandlund
SandlundSandlund
Sandlund
 
EVE 161 Lecture 6
EVE 161 Lecture 6EVE 161 Lecture 6
EVE 161 Lecture 6
 
"Cell", article entitled ""Heroes of CRISPR"
"Cell", article entitled ""Heroes of CRISPR""Cell", article entitled ""Heroes of CRISPR"
"Cell", article entitled ""Heroes of CRISPR"
 
Testing for Food Authenticity
Testing for Food AuthenticityTesting for Food Authenticity
Testing for Food Authenticity
 
RNA-guided Cas9-induced mutagenesis in tobacco
RNA-guided Cas9-induced mutagenesis in tobaccoRNA-guided Cas9-induced mutagenesis in tobacco
RNA-guided Cas9-induced mutagenesis in tobacco
 
EveMicrobial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 9
EveMicrobial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 9EveMicrobial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 9
EveMicrobial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 9
 
EVE161: Microbial Phylogenomics - Class 6 - Tree of Life Example
EVE161: Microbial Phylogenomics - Class 6 - Tree of Life ExampleEVE161: Microbial Phylogenomics - Class 6 - Tree of Life Example
EVE161: Microbial Phylogenomics - Class 6 - Tree of Life Example
 
EVE161: Microbial Phylogenomics - Class 3 - Woese and the Tree of Life
EVE161: Microbial Phylogenomics - Class 3 - Woese and the Tree of LifeEVE161: Microbial Phylogenomics - Class 3 - Woese and the Tree of Life
EVE161: Microbial Phylogenomics - Class 3 - Woese and the Tree of Life
 
Smbe 2013 talk
Smbe 2013 talkSmbe 2013 talk
Smbe 2013 talk
 
An Evolutionarily Conserved Long Noncoding RNA TUNA Controls Pluripotency and...
An Evolutionarily Conserved Long Noncoding RNA TUNA Controls Pluripotency and...An Evolutionarily Conserved Long Noncoding RNA TUNA Controls Pluripotency and...
An Evolutionarily Conserved Long Noncoding RNA TUNA Controls Pluripotency and...
 
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 15: Shotgun Metagenomics
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 15: Shotgun Metagenomics Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 15: Shotgun Metagenomics
Microbial Phylogenomics (EVE161) Class 15: Shotgun Metagenomics
 
Transposable elements of Agavoideae
Transposable elements of AgavoideaeTransposable elements of Agavoideae
Transposable elements of Agavoideae
 

Ähnlich wie Group I intron lateral transfer between red and brown algal ribosomal RNA

Gutell 093.jphy.2005.41.0380
Gutell 093.jphy.2005.41.0380Gutell 093.jphy.2005.41.0380
Gutell 093.jphy.2005.41.0380Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 095.imb.2005.14.625
Gutell 095.imb.2005.14.625Gutell 095.imb.2005.14.625
Gutell 095.imb.2005.14.625Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 086.bmc.evol.biol.2003.03.07
Gutell 086.bmc.evol.biol.2003.03.07Gutell 086.bmc.evol.biol.2003.03.07
Gutell 086.bmc.evol.biol.2003.03.07Robin Gutell
 
Stalking the Fourth Domain in Metagenomic Data: Searching for, Discovering, a...
Stalking the Fourth Domain in Metagenomic Data: Searching for, Discovering, a...Stalking the Fourth Domain in Metagenomic Data: Searching for, Discovering, a...
Stalking the Fourth Domain in Metagenomic Data: Searching for, Discovering, a...Jonathan Eisen
 
Gutell 077.mbe.2001.18.1654
Gutell 077.mbe.2001.18.1654Gutell 077.mbe.2001.18.1654
Gutell 077.mbe.2001.18.1654Robin Gutell
 
PENSOFT ARTICLE COLLECTION ABOUT MYANMAR
PENSOFT ARTICLE COLLECTION ABOUT MYANMARPENSOFT ARTICLE COLLECTION ABOUT MYANMAR
PENSOFT ARTICLE COLLECTION ABOUT MYANMARMYO AUNG Myanmar
 
Utility of transcriptome sequencing for phylogenetic
Utility of transcriptome sequencing for phylogeneticUtility of transcriptome sequencing for phylogenetic
Utility of transcriptome sequencing for phylogeneticEdizonJambormias2
 
High throughput sequencing with Thermostable Group II Intron Reverse Transcri...
High throughput sequencing with Thermostable Group II Intron Reverse Transcri...High throughput sequencing with Thermostable Group II Intron Reverse Transcri...
High throughput sequencing with Thermostable Group II Intron Reverse Transcri...Douglas Wu
 
Crispr handbook 2015
Crispr handbook 2015Crispr handbook 2015
Crispr handbook 2015rochonf
 
© 2011 Nature America.docx
© 2011 Nature America.docx© 2011 Nature America.docx
© 2011 Nature America.docxgerardkortney
 
21 kebere bezaweletaw 207-217
21 kebere bezaweletaw 207-21721 kebere bezaweletaw 207-217
21 kebere bezaweletaw 207-217Alexander Decker
 
Gutell 100.imb.2006.15.533
Gutell 100.imb.2006.15.533Gutell 100.imb.2006.15.533
Gutell 100.imb.2006.15.533Robin Gutell
 
Development of a core set of single-locus SSR markers for allotetraploid rape...
Development of a core set of single-locus SSR markers for allotetraploid rape...Development of a core set of single-locus SSR markers for allotetraploid rape...
Development of a core set of single-locus SSR markers for allotetraploid rape...Eric Du
 
Rapid Impact Assessment of Climatic and Physio-graphic Changes on Flagship G...
Rapid Impact Assessment of Climatic and Physio-graphic Changes  on Flagship G...Rapid Impact Assessment of Climatic and Physio-graphic Changes  on Flagship G...
Rapid Impact Assessment of Climatic and Physio-graphic Changes on Flagship G...Arvinder Singh
 

Ähnlich wie Group I intron lateral transfer between red and brown algal ribosomal RNA (20)

Gutell 093.jphy.2005.41.0380
Gutell 093.jphy.2005.41.0380Gutell 093.jphy.2005.41.0380
Gutell 093.jphy.2005.41.0380
 
Gutell 095.imb.2005.14.625
Gutell 095.imb.2005.14.625Gutell 095.imb.2005.14.625
Gutell 095.imb.2005.14.625
 
Gutell 086.bmc.evol.biol.2003.03.07
Gutell 086.bmc.evol.biol.2003.03.07Gutell 086.bmc.evol.biol.2003.03.07
Gutell 086.bmc.evol.biol.2003.03.07
 
1-s2.0-S0923250811001872-main
1-s2.0-S0923250811001872-main1-s2.0-S0923250811001872-main
1-s2.0-S0923250811001872-main
 
Stalking the Fourth Domain in Metagenomic Data: Searching for, Discovering, a...
Stalking the Fourth Domain in Metagenomic Data: Searching for, Discovering, a...Stalking the Fourth Domain in Metagenomic Data: Searching for, Discovering, a...
Stalking the Fourth Domain in Metagenomic Data: Searching for, Discovering, a...
 
Gutell 077.mbe.2001.18.1654
Gutell 077.mbe.2001.18.1654Gutell 077.mbe.2001.18.1654
Gutell 077.mbe.2001.18.1654
 
PENSOFT ARTICLE COLLECTION ABOUT MYANMAR
PENSOFT ARTICLE COLLECTION ABOUT MYANMARPENSOFT ARTICLE COLLECTION ABOUT MYANMAR
PENSOFT ARTICLE COLLECTION ABOUT MYANMAR
 
bai2
bai2bai2
bai2
 
Utility of transcriptome sequencing for phylogenetic
Utility of transcriptome sequencing for phylogeneticUtility of transcriptome sequencing for phylogenetic
Utility of transcriptome sequencing for phylogenetic
 
High throughput sequencing with Thermostable Group II Intron Reverse Transcri...
High throughput sequencing with Thermostable Group II Intron Reverse Transcri...High throughput sequencing with Thermostable Group II Intron Reverse Transcri...
High throughput sequencing with Thermostable Group II Intron Reverse Transcri...
 
Crispr handbook 2015
Crispr handbook 2015Crispr handbook 2015
Crispr handbook 2015
 
© 2011 Nature America.docx
© 2011 Nature America.docx© 2011 Nature America.docx
© 2011 Nature America.docx
 
21 kebere bezaweletaw 207-217
21 kebere bezaweletaw 207-21721 kebere bezaweletaw 207-217
21 kebere bezaweletaw 207-217
 
Nature Of Gene.pdf
Nature Of Gene.pdfNature Of Gene.pdf
Nature Of Gene.pdf
 
Nature Of Gene.pdf
Nature Of Gene.pdfNature Of Gene.pdf
Nature Of Gene.pdf
 
GJB6
GJB6GJB6
GJB6
 
Gutell 100.imb.2006.15.533
Gutell 100.imb.2006.15.533Gutell 100.imb.2006.15.533
Gutell 100.imb.2006.15.533
 
paper
paperpaper
paper
 
Development of a core set of single-locus SSR markers for allotetraploid rape...
Development of a core set of single-locus SSR markers for allotetraploid rape...Development of a core set of single-locus SSR markers for allotetraploid rape...
Development of a core set of single-locus SSR markers for allotetraploid rape...
 
Rapid Impact Assessment of Climatic and Physio-graphic Changes on Flagship G...
Rapid Impact Assessment of Climatic and Physio-graphic Changes  on Flagship G...Rapid Impact Assessment of Climatic and Physio-graphic Changes  on Flagship G...
Rapid Impact Assessment of Climatic and Physio-graphic Changes on Flagship G...
 

Mehr von Robin Gutell

Gutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xi
Gutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xiGutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xi
Gutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xiRobin Gutell
 
Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803
Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803
Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013
Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013
Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676
Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676
Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_data
Gutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_dataGutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_data
Gutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_dataRobin Gutell
 
Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383
Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383
Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfig
Gutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfigGutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfig
Gutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfigRobin Gutell
 
Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473
Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473
Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22
Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22
Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011
Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011
Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011
Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011
Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768
Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768
Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497
Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497
Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485
Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485
Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195
Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195
Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277
Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277
Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769
Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769
Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200
Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200
Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2
Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2
Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2Robin Gutell
 
Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043
Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043
Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043Robin Gutell
 

Mehr von Robin Gutell (20)

Gutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xi
Gutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xiGutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xi
Gutell 124.rna 2013-woese-19-vii-xi
 
Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803
Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803
Gutell 123.app environ micro_2013_79_1803
 
Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013
Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013
Gutell 122.chapter comparative analy_russell_2013
 
Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676
Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676
Gutell 121.bibm12 alignment 06392676
 
Gutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_data
Gutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_dataGutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_data
Gutell 120.plos_one_2012_7_e38320_supplemental_data
 
Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383
Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383
Gutell 119.plos_one_2017_7_e39383
 
Gutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfig
Gutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfigGutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfig
Gutell 118.plos_one_2012.7_e38203.supplementalfig
 
Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473
Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473
Gutell 114.jmb.2011.413.0473
 
Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22
Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22
Gutell 117.rcad_e_science_stockholm_pp15-22
 
Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011
Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011
Gutell 116.rpass.bibm11.pp618-622.2011
 
Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011
Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011
Gutell 115.rna2dmap.bibm11.pp613-617.2011
 
Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768
Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768
Gutell 113.ploso.2011.06.e18768
 
Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497
Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497
Gutell 112.j.phys.chem.b.2010.114.13497
 
Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485
Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485
Gutell 111.bmc.genomics.2010.11.485
 
Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195
Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195
Gutell 110.ant.v.leeuwenhoek.2010.98.195
 
Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277
Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277
Gutell 109.ejp.2009.44.277
 
Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769
Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769
Gutell 108.jmb.2009.391.769
 
Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200
Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200
Gutell 107.ssdbm.2009.200
 
Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2
Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2
Gutell 106.j.euk.microbio.2009.56.0142.2
 
Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043
Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043
Gutell 105.zoologica.scripta.2009.38.0043
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptxHampshireHUG
 
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdfhans926745
 
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure serviceWhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure servicePooja Nehwal
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking MenDelhi Call girls
 
Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024The Digital Insurer
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerThousandEyes
 
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time AutomationFrom Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time AutomationSafe Software
 
Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...
Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...
Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...Enterprise Knowledge
 
Slack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 SlidesSlack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 Slidespraypatel2
 
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Allon Mureinik
 
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with NanonetsHow to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonetsnaman860154
 
Boost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivity
Boost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivityBoost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivity
Boost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivityPrincipled Technologies
 
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law DevelopmentsTrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law DevelopmentsTrustArc
 
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024Rafal Los
 
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of Brazil
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of BrazilDeveloping An App To Navigate The Roads of Brazil
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of BrazilV3cube
 
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024Results
 
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...Neo4j
 
Kalyanpur ) Call Girls in Lucknow Finest Escorts Service 🍸 8923113531 🎰 Avail...
Kalyanpur ) Call Girls in Lucknow Finest Escorts Service 🍸 8923113531 🎰 Avail...Kalyanpur ) Call Girls in Lucknow Finest Escorts Service 🍸 8923113531 🎰 Avail...
Kalyanpur ) Call Girls in Lucknow Finest Escorts Service 🍸 8923113531 🎰 Avail...gurkirankumar98700
 
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdfThe Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdfEnterprise Knowledge
 
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone ProcessorsExploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processorsdebabhi2
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
 
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf
 
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure serviceWhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
 
Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
 
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time AutomationFrom Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
 
Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...
Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...
Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...
 
Slack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 SlidesSlack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 Slides
 
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
 
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with NanonetsHow to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
 
Boost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivity
Boost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivityBoost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivity
Boost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivity
 
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law DevelopmentsTrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
 
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
 
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of Brazil
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of BrazilDeveloping An App To Navigate The Roads of Brazil
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of Brazil
 
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024
 
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
 
Kalyanpur ) Call Girls in Lucknow Finest Escorts Service 🍸 8923113531 🎰 Avail...
Kalyanpur ) Call Girls in Lucknow Finest Escorts Service 🍸 8923113531 🎰 Avail...Kalyanpur ) Call Girls in Lucknow Finest Escorts Service 🍸 8923113531 🎰 Avail...
Kalyanpur ) Call Girls in Lucknow Finest Escorts Service 🍸 8923113531 🎰 Avail...
 
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdfThe Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
 
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone ProcessorsExploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
 

Group I intron lateral transfer between red and brown algal ribosomal RNA

  • 1. RESEARCH ARTICLE Debashish Bhattacharya á Jamie J. Cannone Robin R. Gutell Group I intron lateral transfer between red and brown algal ribosomal RNA Received: 12 February 2001 / Accepted: 26 April 2001 / Published online: 17 July 2001 Ó Springer-Verlag 2001 Abstract How group I introns originate in nuclear rib- osomal (r)RNA genes is an important question in evo- lutionary biology. Central to this issue is the multitude of group I introns present in evolutionarily distantly related plant, fungal, and protist lineages, together with an understanding of their origin and lateral transfer from one exon to another, between cell organelles, and between cells. These introns vary considerably in pri- mary and secondary structure; and their provenance from a few or perhaps many mobile elements that have spread in rRNAs is unknown. Here we show that a novel lineage of group IC1 introns inserted at posi- tion 516 (Escherichia coli gene numbering) in the small subunit rRNA in bangiophyte red algae and a brown alga (Aureoumbra lagunensis) are speci®cally related, although their host cells are not. These bangiophyte and Aureoumbra introns are the only known cases that have a helical insertion in the P5b helix. The highly conserved primary and secondary structure of the extra P5b helix suggests that it is important, although its speci®c func- tion is unknown. Our study attempts to understand the origin and movement of these IC1 introns. Keywords Group I intron á Stramenopiles á Lateral transfer á Phylogeny Introduction Group I introns are a distinct class of RNA enzymes that are characterized by a conserved RNA primary and secondary structure essential for splicing and are often capable of ``self-splicing'' (Kruger et al. 1982; Cech 1985). Clarifying the origin and evolutionary history of group I introns helps us understand how these sequences have persisted for billions of years and, more generally, addresses the possible role(s) of catalytic RNAs in modern cells. The sporadic and wide distribution of group I introns in the nuclear-encoded small (SSU) and large (LSU) subunit ribosomal (r)RNA and organellar genes of green algae, red algae, fungi, ciliates, amoebae, and other organisms (Cannone et al., unpublished data) suggests that these sequences are highly successful at invading and maintaining themselves in eukaryotic genomes (Bhattacharya et al. 1994, 1996a; Turmel et al. 1995; Bhattacharya 1998; Nishida et al. 1998; Watanabe et al. 1998; Suh et al. 1999; Friedl et al. 2000). In this study, we use secondary structure and phylo- genetic analyses to address the lateral transfer of group I introns in nuclear rRNA. To approach this issue, unique structural features of introns are tracked through evo- lutionary time. We also use traditional phylogenetic methods to determine the evolutionary relationships of these introns and their host cells. Currently, there are approximately 1,214 group I introns available in Gen- Bank. Our analyses of these sequences [summarized at the Comparative RNA web site (CRW), http:// www.rna.icmb.utexas.edu/] resulted in their classi®ca- tion into ®ve major structural subgroups [Michel and Westhof 1990 (subgroups A±D); Suh et al. 1999 (sub- group E)]. Within the order Bangiales in the Rhodo- phyta (red algae), IC1 introns at position 516 revealed a unique insertion in the P5b helix, which is absent from all other IC1 introns (Gutell and Cannone, unpublished data). Subsequently, we found a group I intron in a brown algal stramenopile, Aureoumbra lagunenesis, with the same unusual insertion that, coincidentally, also Curr Genet (2001) 40: 82±90 DOI 10.1007/s002940100227 Communicated by R.W. Lee D. Bhattacharya (&) Department of Biological Sciences, University of Iowa, 239 Biology Building, Iowa City, IA 52242-1324, USA E-mail: dbhattac@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu J.J. Cannone á R.R. Gutell Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas, 2500 Speedway, Austin, TX 78712-1095, USA
  • 2. occurred at position 516 in small subunit rRNA. This collection of ``tagged'' 516 introns and the sequences for the SSU rRNA in the host cells have presented us with the opportunity to explore the lateral transfer of a group I intron. There are two major scenarios that could explain this situation: 1. Introns early. The 516 intron was present in the SSU rRNA of the common ancestor of red and brown algae and has been maintained only in the Bangiales and Aureoumbra. This scenario would be supported by a close evolutionary relationship between red and brown algae, whereas a distant relationship would support independent acquisition of the intron. 2. Introns late. The presence of the 516 intron in the Bangiales and Aureoumbra is best explained by in- dependent acquisition of the intron after the separa- tion of red and brown algae. We used phylogenetic analyses of introns and SSU rRNA coding regions to address the origin of these 516 introns. Materials and methods Intron and rRNA sequences The publicly available sequences analyzed here were retrieved from GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/index.html), at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The rRNA and rRNA introns were usu- ally identi®ed by searching for the words ``rRNA'' and ``introns'', and for ``rRNA'' in the feature key ®eld in the Entrez web- searching utility (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Entrez/). However, we have utilized the BLAST utility (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ BLAST/) to identify some intron sequences that are similar to the red algal rRNA intron sequences, but are not always annotated properly in their GenBank entry. Although the boundaries for the rRNA exons and introns are usually annotated properly, we have independently determined the intron/exon borders. Alignment and secondary structure models and diagrams Secondary structure diagrams for the red and brown algal group I introns were modeled from the current comparative structure models for the IC1 introns (Michel and Westhof 1990; Damberger and Gutell 1994; Gutell and Cannone, unpublished data). These structural models are derived by comparative sequence analysis, a method based on the simple premise that RNAs within the same family (e.g., tRNA, group I intron) that have similar functions will have similar secondary and tertiary structures (reviewed in Gutell 1996). The red and brown algal intron sequences were aligned with the IC1 sequences, because these were the most similar in sequence and structure. All sequences were manually aligned using the SUN Microsystems UNIX-based alignment editor AE2 (T. Macke, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, Calif.) to maximize sequence and structure identity, to maintain (when possible) previously proposed base-pairings, and to minimize the number of insertion and deletion events. Once the secondary structure model had been determined, the computer version of the diagram was drawn with the interactive SUN Microsystems UNIX-based, interactive graphics program XRNA (B. Weiser and H. Noller, University of California at Santa Cruz, Calif.). Phylogenetic analyses For the group I intron data, a set of 62 group IC1 and IE intron sequences from nuclear (16S and 16S-like) SSU rRNA in green algae, red algae, fungi, Acanthamoeba grini, and Naegleria spp. were manually aligned, using primary and secondary structure similarity to juxtapose homologous regions (e.g., Michel and Westhof 1990; Bhattacharya et al. 1994; Damberger and Gutell 1994). An alignment with a total length of 4,523 characters, in- cluding insertions in the di€erent introns, was submitted to a pair- wise distance analysis, using the HKY-85 model (Hasegawa et al. 1985) with equal rates across sites and the transition/transversion ratio=2. Missing data and gaps were excluded from each pair-wise comparison. This distance matrix was used as input for neighbor- joining tree-building. A total of 1,000 bootstrap replicates (Fel- senstein 1985) were analyzed with the distance method. We also used the Modeltest program (ver. 3.04; Posada and Crandall 1998) to survey 56 possible models of DNA substitution, to identify the model that best ®t the intron data. This analysis showed the general time-reversible model (RodrõÂguez et al. 1990) with estimations of nucleotide frequencies (A=0.244, C=0.251, G=0.271, T=0.234), the shape parameter of the gamma distribution (a=0.764) to ac- commodate rate variations across sites, and the proportion of in- variant sites (0.016) that are unable to accept substitutions (GTR+G+I) as best ®tting the intron data. The GTR+G+I model was used to calculate bootstrap values (1,000 replicates) for monophyletic groups identi®ed by the HKY-85 distance tree. In this way, we had estimates of support for di€erent groups in the intron tree, using evolutionary models that were either relatively simple (HKY-85), or parameter-rich (GTR+G+I). The IE introns were used to root the intron tree. The complete SSU rRNA sequences from a broadly diverse set of red algae and stramenopiles were also aligned, using conserved secondary structures, and 1,581 nt that could be simultaneously aligned in all the sequences were submitted to a distance analysis using the HKY-85 model (as described above). Modeltest also identi®ed the GTR+G+I model as best ®tting the rRNA data; and so it was used in the distance bootstrap analysis (1,000 repli- cates). The parameter value estimates for this data set were: A=0.251, C=0.206, G=0.281, T=0.262, proportion of invariant sites=0.359, a=0.548). These data were also analyzed with an unweighted maximum parsimony method. Initial trees were built stepwise with ten random sequence additions; and the trees were rearranged with tree bisection/reconnection, to ®nd the most par- simonious phylogeny. A total of 1,000 bootstrap replicates were analyzed with this method. The stramenopile sequences were used to root the SSU rRNA tree. All phylogenetic analyses were done with PAUP* (ver. 4.0b8; Swo€ord 2001). The ®gures presented in this text, along with other secondary structure diagrams, are available at the web site http://www.rna.icmb.utexas.edu/PHYLO/ ALGINT and are referred to in this text as the CRW Algal Introns. Results and Discussion Secondary structure analysis of the 516 introns An analysis of the group I introns at the online CRW web site revealed that 59 bangiophytes in the mono- phyletic red algal order Bangiales (Bangia and Porphyra spp; MuÈ ller et al. 1998, 2001a; Oliveira and Bhattach- arya 2000) contained a IC1 intron at SSU rRNA posi- tion 516 with the following characteristic: they each had an insertion in the P5b helix (see Fig. 1A,C) which is absent from the other IC1 introns, except for an intron in A. lagunensis (Fig. 1B, Table 1). The Aureombra group I intron was also in subgroup C1, had the P5b insertion, and mapped to the 516 site in SSU rRNA. Detailed analysis of the P5b helix provided strong evidence for its homology in the red and brown algal 516 introns. The insertion was conserved in size (19 nucleotides) and the 83
  • 3. tetraloop hairpin sequence at position 156:9±12 (Fig. 1D) showed high identity (5¢-GYAA-3¢) to one of the canonical hairpin tetraloop sequences initially iden- ti®ed in 16S rRNA (Woese et al. 1990). All of the base pair positions have some underlying variation, and they all contain G:C, A:U, or G:U base pairs in all of the sequences with this insertion. The three base pairs with the purest covariance are 3:18, 7:14, and 8:13 (see dark boxes in Fig. 1D, Table 2). Taken together, these ob- servations were consistent with a single origin of the P5b insertion and, by extension, of the 516 introns contain- ing the extra helix. The pattern of sequence conservation of the P5b helix also suggested that it is involved in a RNA±RNA tertiary structure interaction within the P5abc subdomain (Cate et al. 1996; Doherty et al. 1999; Doherty and Doudna 2000). Tetraloops often dock into stem-loop structures in other regions of RNA. An ex- ample of such an interaction is between domains 5 and 1 of group II introns (Abramovitz and Pyle 1997). The conserved nature of such higher-order interactions also generally requires that the helices capped by tetraloops be of a ®xed length (Hedenstierna et al. 2000), as found in the P5b insertions (see Fig. 1D). Regardless of its speci®c role, upon establishment, the helix has appar- ently been under strong selective constraint and has not been lost in any of the 31 publicly available introns at position 516 in the SSU rRNA that have been reported from the Bangiales or from Aureoumbra. To determine whether other publicly available group I introns, none of which apparently contain the P5b insertion described here, may share a close evolutionary relationship with the Bangiales and Aureoumbra 84
  • 4. 516 introns, we used the BLAST program (BLASTN ver. 2.1.2; Altschul et al. 1997) to search for other intron sequences with signi®cant sequence identity with the Aureoumbra intron. This analysis identi®ed introns in two strains of the lobose amoeba, Acanthamoeba grini (GenBank S81337, U02540), with a 95% identity over a 48-bp sequence. Intrigued by this result, both Acanth- amoeba intron sequences (strains ATCC30731, H37) were included in our intron alignment; and secondary structure models were developed. The Acanthamoeba introns also interrupt the SSU rRNA at the 516 site, although they each lack the insertion in the P5b helix (CRW Algal Introns). The Acanthamoeba introns, however, share many secondary structure features in common with IC1 introns, such as the nine conserved helical domains shown in Fig. 1A, and can conclusively be classi®ed in this group (for details, see Michel and Westhof 1990; Suh et al. 1999). To put the ®nding of the P5b insertion in perspective, of the approximately 1,214 publicly available group I introns (350 of which are in subgroup IC1), approxi- mately 772 of them occur in SSU and LSU rRNA; and nearly 600 of these introns interrupt 35 di€erent SSU rRNA sites. The SSU rRNA sites with the largest number of introns are 1506 (123 introns), 516 (92 in- trons), and 943 (90 introns). Approximately one-half of the 516 introns are in subgroup IC1, whereas the other half are in the IE subgroup. In the entire group I intron data set, only the Bangiales and Aureoumbra IC1 516 introns contain the P5b insertion. Thus, this inser- tion associates these two sets of introns and suggests that they are speci®cally related to one another. To resolve the evolutionary relationships of these introns, we re- Table 1 List of organisms containing the inserted helix in the P5b region of the IC1 516 introns. GenBank accession numbers are listed at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ Organism Strain/isolate GenBank accession number Aureoumbra lagunensis U40258 Bangia atropurpurea D88387 B. fuscopurpurea AF342745 Porphyra carolinensis AF133792 P. dentata Isolate Koga Fukuoka AB013183 P. haitanensis AB015795 P. katadae Isolate Kawatana Yamaguchi AB013184 P. leucosticta (Baltic) AF342746 P. lilliputiana AF136424 P. onoi AB015794 P. pseudolinearis Isolate Tohaku Tottori AB013185 Porphyra sp. Isolate GRB108 AF136420 Porphyra sp. Isolate RAK049 AF136425 Porphyra sp. Isolate Shimonoseki Yamaguchi AB013182 Porphyra sp. Strain BRU107 AF136418, AF136419 P. suborbiculata AB015796 P. suborbiculata Isolate Kawatana Yamaguchi AB013180 P. tenera Isolate Kawaura Kumamoto AB013176 P. tenera Isolate Matsukawa Fukushima; strain Matsukawa-3 AB029883 P. tenera Isolate Matsukawa Fukushima; strain Matsukawa-4 AB029884 P. tenera Isolate Shinwa Kumamoto AB013175 P. tenera Isolate Shinwa Kumamoto; strain Kawaura-4 AB029881 P. tenera Isolate Shinwa Kumamoto; strain Shinwa-2 AB029879 P. tenera Isolate Shinwa Kumamoto; strain Shinwa-3 AB029880 P. tenera Strain T-1 D86237 P. tenera Strain TU-3 D86236 P. tenera Strain T8 AB000964 P. tenuipedalis AB015797 P. yezoensis D79976 P. yezoensis Isolate Hakodate Hokkaido AB013177 P. yezoensis Isolate Ogatsu Miyagi AB013178 Fig. 1A±D Analysis of intron secondary structures. A Compara- tive secondary structure model for the group IC1 intron at position 516 in the small subunit (SSU) rRNA of Bangia atropurpurea (GenBank D88387), drawn according to the conven- tions of Cech et al. (1994). The 5¢ and 3¢ splice junctions are marked with arrows, as are the locations of the pairing segments P1±P9 and the internal guide sequence (IGS). A portion of P2.1 marked a is shown as the primary structure and has not been folded in this model. B The secondary structure model of the Aureoumbra lagunensis intron (U40258). C Comparison of the P5a±c domains in the 516 introns in B. fuscopurpurea (AF342745), Porphyra leucost- icta (AF342746), and Tetrahymena thermophila (J01235). D Alignment of the P5b region, including the insertion. Base-pairings in helices are identi®ed in the boxed regions; and the insertion is identi®ed by the bold boxes. The T. thermophila large subunit rRNA group I intron is used as the reference for these comparisons. These secondary structure ®gures, including the T. thermophila, Acanthamoeba spp, and all the red and brown algal intron diagrams we have determined for sequences that are publicly available, can be accessed at our comparative RNA web site (http://www.rna.icmb.utexas.edu/) and at http://www.rna.icmb.ut- exas.edu/PHYLO/ALGINT/ b 85
  • 5. constructed the phylogeny of the 516 introns, other SSU rRNA introns, and the host cells that contain them, using more traditional phylogenetic methods. Test for mutational saturation of introns Before embarking on phylogenetic analyses with the group I intron sequences, we wanted to ®rst establish that they encoded a signi®cant phylogenetic signal. To do this, a data set of 62 sequences that spanned the di- versity of IC1 and IE intron SSU rRNA insertion sites (see Figs. 2, 3) was used to determine the extent of su- perimposed substitutions. Uncorrected distances were plotted versus those corrected with the HKY-85 model to detect mutational saturation with regard to trans- versions and transitions (see Daugbjerg and Andersen 1997; Lopez et al. 1999). In this analysis, the bending of the line at higher, uncorrected distances indicates mu- tational saturation (Moritz et al. 1992). The plots pre- sented in Fig. 2 suggest that the group I introns encode a signi®cant phylogenetic signal. Transversions show a minor level of mutational saturation, whereas transi- tions become more rapidly saturated as intron sequence divergence increases. One obviously cannot compare these group I introns to ``workhorse'' molecular markers such as rRNA coding regions, in terms of utility across a broad phylogenetic spectrum. The introns often have 4± 10 times greater rates of sequence divergence (Bhat- tacharya et al. 1996b). Nonetheless, these sequences contain a phylogenetic signal that can be used to esti- mate a group I intron evolutionary tree. Phylogenetic analysis of introns and host cells To test the monophyly of the Bangiales and Aureoumbra 516 introns developed by the comparison of the intron secondary structure features, we ®rst estimated a phy- logeny of the IC1 and IE introns from a wide variety of algae and protists. The preliminary distance analysis, which included 322 IC1 and 101 IE introns in nuclear SSU and LSU rRNA demonstrated a speci®c evolu- tionary relationship between the Acanthamoeba, Aureo- umbra, and red algal 516 introns within the IC1 cluster (data not shown). This group was distinct from all other IC1 introns and all other publicly available introns at the 516 site, i.e., those in Naegleria spp and the IE 516 introns. Knowing this, we reduced the data set to 62 SSU rRNA introns for a more detailed analysis. The distance tree (HKY-85 model) inferred from the reduced data set of group I introns provides strong support (96% bootstrap value) for the monophyly of the Acanthamoeba, Bangiales, and Aureoumbra IC1 introns at position 516, the early divergence of the Acanth- amoeba introns within this clade (86% bootstrap sup- port), and the distant evolutionary relationship of these introns to the 516 introns in the IE group (Fig. 3). The Naegleria spp. 516 introns are positioned at the base of the IC1 516 intron clade without bootstrap support. It is, therefore, unclear whether the Naegleria introns are monophyletic with the other 516 introns in subgroup IC1. Interestingly, the IC1 subgroup also includes the 1506 SSU rRNA intron in the Bangiales and one mem- ber of the derived red algal subclass Florideophycidae (Hildenbrandia rubra; Ragan et al. 1993). The Bangiales Fig. 2 Plots of uncorrected pair-wise substitutions ver- sus values corrected for multiple hits (HKY-85 model; Hasegawa et al. 1985) for the group I introns included in the phylogeny shown in Fig. 3. Transitions and transversions are studied separately. In this analysis, the bending of the line at higher uncorrected distances indicates mutational satura- tion (Moritz et al. 1992) Table 2 Base-pair frequencies for the inserted helix in P5b found in the red and brown algae. Data are presented for the 31 publicly available sequences containing this inserted helix (30 red algae, 1 brown alga, see Table 1). Base-pairs refer to the ``insertion numbers'' shown in Fig. 1D. For each base-pair, ± represents a combination which is not present at that base-pair. In the Notes, A, B, and C refer to the marked base-pairs in Fig. 1D Base-pair G:C C:G A:U U:A G:U U:G Notes 03:18 96.8% ± 3.2% ± ± ± A 04:17 16.1% ± 71.0% ± 12.9% ± 05:16 38.7% ± 6.5% 3.2% 51.6% ± B 06:15 ± 96.8% ± ± ± 3.2% 07:14 96.8% ± ± 3.2% ± ± C 08:13 3.2% ± 96.8% ± ± ± 86
  • 6. are postulated to be the sister group of the Florid- eophycidae (Oliveira and Bhattacharya 2000; MuÈ ller et al. 2001b), a hypothesis that is supported by the presence of the 1506 intron in only these red algae. We presume here that the common ancestor of the Bangi- ales/Florideophycidae likely contained the 1506 intron. Bootstrap-distance analysis of the 516 introns with the GTR+G+I model provided similar results to the HKY-85 model. The monophyly of the IC1 introns at position 516 of Acanthamoeba, Bangiales, and Aureo- umbra was strongly supported (96%), although there Fig. 3 Phylogeny of IC1 and IE introns interrupting the nuclear SSU rRNA of di€erent eukaryotes. This tree was built with neighbor-joining, using a matrix of corrected distances (HKY-85 model). Bootstrap values (1,000 replications) are shown at the branches. The values shown below the branches result from a distance bootstrap analysis (1,000 replications), using the GTR+G+I model. Only values ³50% are shown. The rRNA intron insertion sites are indicated. The tree has been rooted on the branch leading to the IE introns. GenBank accession numbers are shown (in parentheses) for each intron sequence. The group IC1 introns at position 516 that contain the P5b insertion are shown in bold 87
  • 7. was again no support found for the inclusion of the Naegleria spp. 516 introns within this clade. Given this phylogenetic framework for the group I introns at SSU rRNA site 516, we studied the phylogeny of the host cells containing these introns. Analysis of the SSU rRNA in red algae and stramenopiles showed that taxa containing the 516 intron are evolutionarily dis- tantly related (Fig. 4). Recent phylogenetic analyses of more extensive data sets also suggested that the red algae share a most recent common ancestry with the green algae and land plants (Burger et al. 1999; Moreira et al. 2000). None of the green algae and land plants, however, contain an IC1 intron at position 516. The strameno- piles are often allied with alveolate protists, Acanth- amoeba spp. are members of the Mycetozoa (a sister group of fungi/animals), and Naegleria (Heterolobosea) is a sister group of the Euglenozoa (e.g., Baldauf et al. 2000; Van de Peer et al. 2000). There is, therefore, no direct evidence to support a close evolutionary rela- tionship between red algae, brown algae, acanthame- bids, and Naegleria spp. The most parsimonious explanation for the close relationship of the IC1 516 introns, whereas the host cells containing them are not closely related, is that the intron was independently inserted into the homologous SSU rRNA site in the Bangiales, Aureoumbra, Acanthamoeba, and Naegleria (i.e., introns late). An observation that is consistent with this hypothesis is that, of 373 stramenopile SSU rRNA coding regions that have been determined (organism names and GenBank accession numbers available at CRW-algal introns), only the relatively late-diverging Aureoumbra (Pelagophyceae) contains the IC1 516 in- tron (see Fig. 4). To explain this distribution in terms of introns early, one would need to invoke the non-parsi- monious hypothesis of widespread intron loss in all stramenopiles, except for the relatively late-diverging Aureoumbra (see Fig. 4). Furthermore, the 516 intron is limited to and sporadically distributed in the Bangiales within the Rhodophyta; and it is only found in three closely related acanthamebids of about 61 nuclear SSU rRNA sequences of Acanthamoeba strains/species that are currently available in GenBank (organism names and GenBank accession numbers available at CRW Algal Introns). Another fascinating possibility for the origin of the Aureoumbra IC1 516 intron is through symbiotic gene Fig. 4 Phylogeny of selected red algae (Rhodophytes) and stra- menopiles, based on SSU rRNA sequence comparisons. This tree was built with neighbor-joining, using a matrix of corrected distances (HKY-85 model). Bootstrap values (1,000 replications) are shown above the branches on the left of the slash-marks. The values shown on the right of the slash-marks result from a distance bootstrap analysis (1,000 replications) using the GTR+G+I model. Bootstrap values shown below the branches are derived from an unweighted maximum parsimony analysis (1,000 replica- tions). Only values ³50% are shown. The Bangiales and Aureoum- bra are shown in bold. GenBank accession numbers are indicated (in parentheses) for each SSU rRNA sequence 88
  • 8. transfer. It is now generally believed that the plastid of photosynthetic stramenopiles has arisen through a single secondary (eukaryotic) symbiosis involving a red alga (Douglas et al. 1991; Bhattacharya and Medlin 1995, 1998; Daugbjerg and Andersen 1997; Oliveira and Bhattacharya 2000). It is, therefore, conceivable that the Aureoumbra intron may trace its origin to an intron in the rRNA gene of the red algal secondary symbiont. The intron could have been transferred from the symbiont nucleus to that of the stramenopile prior to the elimi- nation of the red algal nuclear genome. However, an observation that argues against this scenario is that, as stated above, only Aureoumbra (of the many nuclear SSU rRNA sequences that have been determined from photosynthetic stramenopiles) contains an IC1 intron at position 516 in the SSU rRNA. If the intron was present in the photosynthetic ancestor of all stramenopiles, then it must have been lost in all of these taxa, except for the relatively late-diverging Aureoumbra. In conclusion, our analyses provide clear insights into the origin of the IC1 introns at the 516 site of SSU rRNA. The host-cell phylogenetic data suggest that it is unlikely that this intron was vertically inherited from the common ancestor of the red algae, brown algae, acanthamebids, and Naegleria spp., because these lin- eages do not share a speci®c evolutionary relationship. This hypothesis is supported by the restricted distribu- tion of the intron in each of the host-cell lineages. The intron phylogeny shows that the IC1 516 intron is evo- lutionarily distantly related to the IE 516 intron, supporting independent intron insertions into the ho- mologous SSU rRNA site. The intron tree also provides strong support for the monophyly of the IC1 516 intron containing the insertion in helix P5b within the Bangiales and Aureoumbra. This group also includes the Acanth- amoeba 516 intron that lacks the insertion. The Naegleria spp 516 introns are only distantly related to this clade. Taken together, these data are consistent with the second scenario that the Bangiales and Aureoumbra IC1 516 introns were acquired after the separation of the red and brown algal lineages. We suggest this intron has been inserted independently into the SSU rRNA of the Bangiales, into a single stramenopile brown alga, Aureoumbra, and into derived members of the genera Acanthamoeba and Naegleria. Finally, our data suggest not only that lateral transfer may establish new intron lineages in di€erent organisms but also that, over time, these sequences may evolve into distinct secondary structure variants (i.e., containing the P5b helix inser- tion), perhaps re¯ecting selection pressure to adapt to the novel splicing environment. The IC1 introns at po- sition 516 in the SSU rRNA may, therefore, be a valu- able example of how novel intron groups are created through the dual process of lateral transfer followed by rapid secondary structure evolution. In this regard, the P5b insertion has unambiguously marked the intron in the Bangiales and Aureoumbra and has allowed us to identify these homologous introns in evolutionarily di- vergent protists. Detailed analysis of group I intron secondary structure promises, therefore, to provide an important source of comparative data to elucidate intron origin and evolution. Acknowledgements D.B. was supported by grants from the Carver Foundation. R.R.G. was supported by research grant NIH- GM48207 and start-up funds from the University of Texas, Insti- tute for Cellular and Molecular Biology. References Abramovitz DL, Pyle AM (1997) Remarkable morphological variability of a common RNA folding motif: the GNRA tetraloop±receptor interaction. J Mol Biol 266:493±506 Altschul SF, Madden TL, SchaÈ €er AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389±3402 Baldauf S, Roger AJ, Wenk-Siefert I, Doolittle WF (2000) A kingdom-level phylogeny of eukaryotes based on combined protein data. Science 290:972±977 Bhattacharya D (1998) The origin and evolution of protist group I introns. Protist 149:113±122 Bhattacharya D, Medlin L (1995) The phylogeny of plastids: a review based on comparisons of small subunit ribosomal RNA coding regions. J Phycol 31:489±498 Bhattacharya D, Medlin L (1998) Algal phylogeny and the origin of land plants. Plant Physiol 116:9±15 Bhattacharya D, Surek B, RuÈ sing M, Damberger S, Melkonian M (1994) Group I introns are inherited through common ancestry in the nuclear-encoded rRNA of Zygnematales (Charophy- ceae). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:9916±9920 Bhattacharya D, Friedl T, Damberger S (1996a) Nuclear-encoded rDNA group I introns: origin and phylogenetic relationships of insertion site lineages in the green algae. Mol Biol Evol 13:978± 989 Bhattacharya D, Damberger S, Surek B, Melkonian M (1996b) Primary and secondary structure analyses of the rDNA group I introns of the Zygnematales (Charophyta). Curr Genet 29:282± 286 Burger G, Saint-Louis D, Gray MW, Lang BF (1999) Complete sequence of the mitochondrial DNA of the red alga Porphyra purpurea: cyanobacterial introns and shared ancestry of red and green algae. Plant Cell 11:1675±1694 Cate JH, Gooding AR, Podell E, Zhou K, Golden BL, Kundrot CE, Cech TR, Doudna JA (1996) Crystal structure of a group I ribozyme domain: principles of RNA packing. Science 273:1678±1685 Cech TR (1985) Self-splicing RNA: implications for evolution. Int Rev Cytol 93:3±22 Cech TR, Damberger SH, Gutell RR (1994) Representation of the secondary and tertiary structure of group I introns. Nat Struct Biol 1:273±280 Damberger SH, Gutell RR (1994) A comparative database of group I intron structures. Nucleic Acid Res 22:3508±3510 Daugbjerg N, Andersen RA (1997) Phylogenetic analyses of the rbcL sequences from haptophytes and heterokont algae suggest their chloroplasts are unrelated. Mol Biol Evol 14:1242±1251 Doherty EA, Doudna JA (2000) Ribozyme structures and mecha- nisms. Annu Rev Biochem 69:597±615 Doherty EA, Herschlag D, Doudna JA (1999) Assembly of an exceptionally stable RNA tertiary interface in a group I ribo- zyme. Biochemistry 38:2982±2990 Douglas SE, Murphy CA, Spencer DF, Gray MW (1991) Molec- ular evidence that cryptomonad algae are evolutionary chima- eras of two phylogenetically distinct eukaryotes. Nature 350:148±151 Felsenstein J (1985) Con®dence intervals on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783±791 89
  • 9. Friedl T, Besendahl A, Pfei€er P, Bhattacharya D (2000) The distribution of group I introns in lichen algae suggests that lichenization facilitates intron lateral transfer. Mol Phylogenet Evol 14:342±352 Gutell RR (1996) Comparative sequence analysis and the structure of 16S and 23S rRNA. In: Zimmermann RA, Dahlberg AE (eds) Ribosomal RNA: structure, evolution, processing, and function in protein biosynthesis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 111±128 Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T (1985) Dating of the human±ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol 22:160±174 Hedenstierna KO, Siefert JL, Fox GE, Murgola EJ (2000) Co- conservation of rRNA tetraloop sequences and helix length suggests involvement of the tetraloops in higher-order interac- tions. Biochimie 82:221±227 Kruger K, Grabowski PJ, Zaug AJ, Sands J, Gottschling DE, Cech TR (1982) Self-splicing RNA: autoexcision and autocyclization of the ribosomal RNA intervening sequence of Tetrahymena. Cell 31:147±157 Lopez P, Forterre P, Philippe H (1999) The root of the tree of life in the light of the covarion model. J Mol Evol 49:496±508 Michel F, Westhof E (1990) Modelling the three-dimensional ar- chitecture of group I catalytic introns based on comparative sequence analysis. J Mol Biol 216:585±610 Moreira D, Le Guyader H, Philippe H (2000) The origin of red algae and the evolution of chloroplasts. Nature 405:69±72 Moritz C, Schneider CJ, Wake DB (1992) Evolutionary relation- ships within the Ensatina eschscholtzii complex con®rm the ring species interpretation. Syst Biol 41:273±291 MuÈ ller KM, Sheath RG, Vis ML, Crease J, Cole KM (1998) Bi- ogeography and systematics of Bangia (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) based on the rubisco spacer, rbcL gene and 18S rRNA gene sequences and morphometric analyses. 1. North America. J Phycol 37:195±207 MuÈ ller KM, Cannone JJ, Gutell RR, Sheath RG (2001a) A struc- tural and phylogenetic analysis of the Group IC1 introns in the order Bangiales (Rhodophyta). Mol Biol Evol 18(8) (in press) MuÈ ller KM, Oliveira MC, Sheath RG, Bhattacharya D (2001b) Ribosomal DNA phylogeny of the Bangiophycidae (Rhodo- phyta) and the origin of secondary plastids. Am J Bot 88(8) (in press) Nishida K, Suzuki S, Kimura Y, Nomura N, Fujie M, Yamada T (1998) Group I introns found in Chlorella viruses: biological implications. Virology 15:319±326 Oliveira M, Bhattacharya D (2000) Phylogeny of the Bang- iophycidae (Rhodophyta) and the secondary endosymbiotic origin of algal plastids. Am J Bot 87:482±492 Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817±818 Ragan MA, Bird CJ, Rice EL, Singh RK (1993) The nuclear 18S ribosomal RNA gene of the red alga Hildenbrandia rubra contains a group I intron. Nucleic Acids Res 21:3898 RodrõÂguez F, Oliver JF, MarõÂn A, Medina JR (1990) The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J Theor Biol 142:485±501 Suh S-O, Jones KG, Blackwell M (1999) A group I intron in the nuclear small subunit rRNA gene of Cryptendoxyla hypophloia, an ascomycetous fungus: evidence for a new major class of group I introns. J Mol Evol 48:493±500 Swo€ord DL (2001) PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsi- mony, ver. 4.0b8. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Turmel M, Coà te V, Otis C, Mercier J-P, Gray MW, Lonergan KM, Lemieux C (1995) Evolutionary transfer of ORF-containing group I introns between di€erent subcellular compartments (chloroplast and mitochondrion). Mol Biol Evol 12:533±545 Van de Peer Y, Baldauf SL, Doolittle WF, Meyer A (2000) An updated and comprehensive rRNA phylogeny of (crown) eu- karyotes based on rate-calibrated evolutionary distances. J Mol Evol 51:565±576 Watanabe KI, Ehara M, Inagaki Y, Ohama T (1998) Distinctive origins of group I introns in the COXI genes of three green algae. Gene 213:1±7 Woese CR, Winker S, Gutell RR (1990) Architecture of ribosomal RNA: constraints on the sequence of tetra-loops. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:8467±8471 90