Better teaching methods will help you to be an effective teacher and escalate your lesson delivery students of all learning styles will enjoy your class. A CCE implementation step of CBSE.

1. Feelings First

2. Task – 1
Duration- 1min.
R K Srivastav 2

3. How do you feel today?
Write your feelings on the slip in 1-2
words.
R K Srivastav 3

4. Task - 2
Duration – 10 min.
R K Srivastav 4

5. 1. Write your name on the top of the A-4 sheet.
2. Fold the sheet to make a paper fan.
3. Give it to your neighbour to write a comment /sentence
about you. And pass on till all have wrriten the comment and it
comes back to you.
4. Read the sentences. How do you feel now?
5. Write it on the slip.
6. Compare your feelings.
7. Now compare or match the feelings from the
feelings list.
R K Srivastav 5

6. Feelings First- List
alert bad focused relaxed uneasy
ambitious bored good serene depressed
angry competant happy shame
Disappoint
ed
leftout energetic neutral Small
-feeling
dow
R K Srivastav 6
awed entheusiast
ic
optimistic stressed inferior
appreciated excited proud tired sad

7. Fillings First
R K Srivastav 7

8. Task -3
Duration – 1min.
R K Srivastav 8

9. What must be done to write on the used
board?
What must be done to fill your mind with new
knowledge/ learning?
R K Srivastav 9
Lets find it.

10. Fillings First
➔ Erase Write
➔ Unlearn Learn
➔ Undo Do
➔ Defocus Focus Refocus
➔ Refocus Focus
➔ Negative Positive
R K Srivastav 10

11. Task – 4.
Duration – 10min.
R K Srivastav 11

12. Draw 21 lines (Vertical/ horizontal) on the
sheet of the measurements given.
Please DO NOT use a scale.
R K Srivastav 12

13. 2cm 5 inch 2.5cm 2”.5cm 6cm 1.5cm 4.9cm
4.5cm 2 inch 7cm
3” 8.4cm 5”.5cm 20mm
5cm 1 inch 8cm 1.5” 9mm 6.1cm 10cm
R K Srivastav 13

14. Give the sheet to the neighbour to measure the lines
(any 5) by observation/ assessment for the
correctness of the lines drawn.
Now for correctness let the next neighbour measure
the same lines with the scale.
What is the conclusion on these evaluations
methods?
R K Srivastav 14

15. Classroom Teaching Competence
R K Srivastav 15

16. 1.Objectives/ Themes
Learning Outcomes
R K Srivastav 16

17. Objectives/ Learning Outcomes
Objectives are NOT stated in the class.
0
Objectives are NOT mentioned clearly.
(just mentioning the title of the lesson is NOT
enough)
1
Objectives are mentioned but NOT highlighted as
in behavioral terms.
2
Objectives are stated and are explained clearly. 3
Objectives of lesson are highlighted repeatedly. 4
R K Srivastav 17

18. 2.Appropriate
Content
R K Srivastav 18

19. Appropriate Content
Content presented at a higher level than the
mental level of learners.
0
Content was rendomly selected. And was NOT
ralevent with objectives. 1
Content has it own logic. And NOT in
correspondence with
Objectives.
2
Content had 1 to 1 correspondance. Teacher
deliberately related the content to objectives. 3
Content was presented in excellent manner/
correlation. And specific objectives of lesson met. 4
R K Srivastav 19

20. 3.Appropriate
Techniques
R K Srivastav 20

21. AppropriateTechniques
Techniques used (teaching) are inappropriate to
the lesson.
0
Techinques used were inappropriaate for some
topics.
1
Techniques used were suitable but NOT
effectively employed.
2
Techniues used were well selected. And
transaction was meaningful.
3
Techniques used were good,with varities,
employed and transacted well. Successful
transaction.
4
R K Srivastav 21

22. 4.Effective Introduction
R K Srivastav 22

23. 5.Learning Chunks
R K Srivastav 24

24. Learning Chunks
Teacher has NO idea of breaking the lesson into small
learning steps (bits/ chunks).
0
Teacher taught whatever S/He knew. It was a package. 1
Teacher broke the contents in small learning chunks.
But NO feed back was taken.
2
Teacher taught the contents in small learning chunks.
Feed back taken to ascertain learning.
3
All steps were co rrelated and recapitulated as
summary in the end.
4
R K Srivastav 25

25. 6. Concepts &
Principles of Learning
R K Srivastav 26

26. Concepts & Principles of Learning
No care and attention/ importance given to
principles of learning. 0
No examples/ demonstrations/ AV aids used.
Understanding of concepts and principles taken for
granted.
1
Examples are used but NOT always appropriately. 2
Examples/ demonstrations/ aids used were appropriate
for concepts and principles. MI theory was kept in mind. 3
Concepts and principles of learning were taken care. And
MI was extensively used in classroom deliberations. 4
R K Srivastav 27

27. 7.Logical
Sequencing
R K Srivastav 28

28. Logical Sequencing
No logical sequence of content delivery. 0
Contents was in chunks/ bits & pieces but logic was
missing.
1
Logic was evident. But missing links were there. 2
Logic was evident in- presentation and sequencing of
ideas were clear.
3
Logical sequence was excellently followed. 4
R K Srivastav 29

29. 8.Learner's
Participation
R K Srivastav 30

30. Learner's Participation
Learners were NOT allowed to participate / question in the
classroom.
0
Learners had absolutely NO work to do, except listening.
Learners felt doing so.
1
Learners were given- work, taking notes, solving problems
and answering to questions. But for half of the time felt
bored.
2
Learners were kept alert. Learners took notes,sketched
figures,solved problems and answered to questions. And
participated in discussions.
3
Learners were -motivated and encouraged to participate in
classroom deliberations. They were involved in various
activities through pair/ group work.
4
R K Srivastav 31

31. 9.Appropriate
Questioning
R K Srivastav 32

32. Appropriate Questioning
No questions were asked at all. 0
Questions were asked rarely.
'DO YOU UNDERSTAND?'
'DO YOU FOLLOW?' These are NOT treated as
questions.
1
Questions asked . Only some were purposeful. Only
few learners were involved in answering the questions.
2
Questions made the lesson alive. Lots of questions
asked to the mojority. Teacher did NOT discourage
learners who gave incorrect/ partially correct answer.
Remidial maesures used.
3
Questions were thought provoking for - in depth
understanding.
Questions were open ended,and asked in
non-threatening and friendly manner.
4
R K Srivastav 33

33. 10. Learners' Questioning
R K Srivastav 34

34. Learners' Questioning
Learners were NOT allowed to ask questions. 0
Learners were discouraged from asking questions/ clearing
their doubts.
1
Learners questions – some were tackled others were ignored. 2
Learners asked many questions. Some were answered by
teacher and for others learners were asked to answer.
3
Learners were encouraged and prompted to ask questions. 4
R K Srivastav 35

35. 11. + Reinforcement
R K Srivastav 36

36. + Reinforcement
Reinforcement totaly ignored. 0
NO questions of reinforcement used- appreciation,
praise/ rebuke.
Class was a one way affair.
1
Reinforcement done- incorrect/ correct responses
reinforced. Only half of learners participation-questions/
resonses was reinforced.
2
All responses were reinforced irresepective of
correctness of resonses.
3
Reinforcement- excellent and positive. Incorrect
responses were collectively handled.
4
R K Srivastav 37

37. 12.Effective
Communication
R K Srivastav 38

38. Effective communication
Language is ineffective and incorrect. 0
Poor expression and incomprehensible.
Lots of distracting mannerisms.
1
Learners understand the teacher partly.
Teacher sometimes check the understanding.
2
Clear expression, frequent checking, positive
body language of teacher.
3
Clear expression, frequent checking, very
effective, unambiguous and positive body
language of teacher.
4
R K Srivastav 39

39. 13. Effective Teaching
R K Srivastav 40

40. Effective Teaching
R K Srivastav 42

41. 14. Sustaining Learners'
Interest
R K Srivastav 43

42. 15. Assessment Of
Learning
R K Srivastav 45

43. Assessment Of Learning
NO attention given to ascertain learning assessment. 0
NO efforts made / infrequent efforts made had very little
to do with stated or unstated objectives.
1
Oral questioning could be done for assessment of few
learners at intermediate and final stages. Learners NOT
sampled for such assessment. Teacher tried to evaluate
points other than key points.
2
Asking questions from selected learners at random
helped in assessment.
3
Excellent care taken to ensure learning through
various modes of assessment.
4
R K Srivastav 46

44. 16. FA used
R K Srivastav 47

45. 17. Pair/ Group Work
R K Srivastav 49

46. Pair/ Groupwork
Only individual work is done among learners. 0
Group work done rare. 1
Group work done occasionally. NOT enough for
encouragement/ promoting it further.
2
Group work is encouraged. But NO proper instruction
given for individual contibution.
3
Within groups a variety of activities done. Individual
guidence given. Peer interaction encouraged.
4
R K Srivastav 50

47. 18. Activities
R K Srivastav 51

48. Activities
Activity/ Project has never been done/ discussed. Only
motive teaching takes place.
0
NO activities / Project rarely done/ experiment . 1
Activities/ project done on some occations but NOT
systematically maintained.
2
Activity /project work good. 3
Activities / project work done regularely and
encouraged.
4
R K Srivastav 52

49. 19. Proper Link-up
R K Srivastav 53

50. Proper Link-up
NO proper link- up/ summerising of main point. 0
Just finished when the time was over. 1
Some key points mentioned BUT there was NO
link-up/ recorded on the board.
2
Main points were discussed and noted on the board /
dictated and learners were asked to note it. A summary
was collected by asking questions as well as link
between the constructive points were also made.
3
Lesson was summerised with excellent link up to all
main points.
4
R K Srivastav 54

51. 20. Lesson Planning
R K Srivastav 55

52. Lesson Planning
NO planning / Scheduling of the lesson. 0
NO time planning. Went astray/ away many times. Was
waiting for the lesson to be finished. Rushed towards the end.
1
It appeared that sometimes the lesson is planned and
sometimes NOT.
2
Planned and systematicapproach. Kept the time. Pace of the
progress same througth the lesson.
3
Highly planned and systematic approach. 4
R K Srivastav 56

53. 21.Teacher's Confidence
R K Srivastav 57

54. Teacher's Confidence
The teacher was confused and nervous. 0
Got confused himself- carried doubts and questions.
Created confusion among learners also.
1
Confusion evident at many times. 2
NO content errors, confident, explained the points in
different ways (PLURASTIC APPROACH). Prepared
for any question from learners.
3
The approcah was- systematic. He/she took questions
and cleared the doubts of the learners.
4
R K Srivastav 58

55. R K Srivastav 59
SOP

56. Standard Operating Procedure
R K Srivastav 60

57. Score/ Grading
R K Srivastav 61

58. Score/ Grading
Excellent 74 - 84 A+
Very good 64 - 73 A
Good 54 - 63
B+
Average 44 - 53 B
R K Srivastav 62
Needs
Improvement
Below 43
C

59. Suggestion
R K Srivastav 63

60. Suggestion
R K Srivastav 64
Start on 1st day of the month/ date 1.
1. Practice item no;1 for the whole day in all periods/ classes.
2. Then on 2nd day practice item no; 2 for the whole day in all periods/
classes. Practice other items, Till you do item no; 21.
3. On 21st of the month you have practiced all items and gained mastery.
Then try practicing all in the next month, in small chunks eg. Items no:s
1-7, 8- 14, 15- 21 in 3 days then all items 1-21 in a go.

61. Task-5
Duration- 20 min
R K Srivastav 65

62. Impromptu Performance
1. Pick the name slip.
2. The person whose name is mentioned on the slip
to pick a slip.
3. Now read the sentence / item no; given and
explain it in 1 min what you learnt about it.
4. Others to carefully listen.
5. Practise points 1- 4 till each one gets a turn to
speak.
R K Srivastav 66

63. Infograhics
R K Srivastav 67

64. R K Srivastav 68

65. R K Srivastav 69

66. R K Srivastav 70

67. R K Srivastav 71

68. R K Srivastav 72

69. R K Srivastav 73

70. R K Srivastav 74

71. R K Srivastav 75

72. R K Srivastav 76

73. R K Srivastav 77
TEAM

74. TogetherEveryoneAcheivesMore
Are you in the team?
R K Srivastav 78

75. . We must not only show the path but walk along if possible.
- RK Srivastav
● Teach them as if you thaught them naught,
teach them as if they forget it naught.
-Alexender Pope
● Great things are not done by impulse
But by a series of small things brought together.
-Vicent Von Gogh
R K Srivastav 79

76. Task- 6
Duration- 7 min.
R K Srivastav 80

77. Mental Movie
1. Sit up right, close your eyes, calm your breathing,
2. Focus on your regular breathing -inflow and out
flow of air. It helps your mind to enter alpha state that
aids reflective thought.
Find your inner world steady.
3. Run the movie. From every thing from the
start of the session what you did, said, saw,heard,
wrote, practiced, performed, learned. Its like a footage
of a movie about yourself. Do you have a peg list and
placed key ideas? Recall one by one.
R K Srivastav 81

78. R K Srivastav 82
Thanks