Into The Wild Essay Thesis

Into The Wild Essay: Into The Wild
Into The Wild Essay Throughout life, many people take big chances and do things that are a little
out of their comfort zone. But would you, or anyone else in the world, ever truly throw away
your life and do something that no other person would truly do? Would you leave everything in
your life behind, and start a new life that you don't know what the outcome will be? Not everyone
is meant to take risks and chances. With this world, no one ever truly knows what will happen.
Some people don't always have the right capabilities that are needed to fulfill a full life in the wild.
Christopher McCandless was a man who never really cared what others thought about him, he
always thought that the actions he was making were always the right ones. Which was not always
necessarily correct. ВЁI think part of what got him into trouble was that he did too much thinking.
Sometimes he tried too hard to make sense...show more content...
ВЁChris had so much natural talent, but if you tried to coach him, to polish his skill, to bring out
that final ten percent, a wall went up. He resisted instruction of any kind.ВЁ (Pg. 111) But as you
can see, some people take that gift that they have, and take it for granted. They think that since they
are smart and know what they're doing, they are above people and when others try to tell them
what to do they shut down. Which is not really a great quality if someone is trying to go into the
wild. If someone tries telling them what is wrong about the decision that they have made, then they
shut down and don't want to hear the other side of the story. People who have this characteristic in
them, they seem to just focus on what they want, and they do not want to listen to anyone else and
what they have to say. They continue to fight for what they believe is right, for example, going into
the wild to get away from the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Into The Wild: A Synthesis Essay
When I was younger, I remember this space in between my back yard and these appartments that
was filled with trees; it was almost like my own personal forest. I would escape there and spend
hours chasing stray cats and making pine cone soup until my mother called me in for dinner. I
remember how I wish that I could have this freedom forever and how I was going to run away
from everything and live in the wild when I got older. A lot of people can relate to wanting to get
away from it all and live just for yourself, but most , like me, ether grew out of it or just keep this
image for a stressful day when you want to relax with no plans on ever completing this fantasy.
Unlike the rest of us there are the few who actually make this this a reality like Christopher Johnson
McCandless who died in the Alaskan wild after pursuing this...show more content...
Jon Krakauer [the author of Into the Wild] writes about his story to teach about how you can change
your role in society and how even given everything you could want in life that sometimes it's more
about having nothing that makes life worth

Into The Wild Synthesis Essay
Into the Wild, by Jon Krakauer that tells the story of a young man who's been in his 20s, went into
Alaska alone and died, however their are more about him that we did not think about. That he
makes us understand the real Chris McCandless, from a bibliographic point a view. The people he
met, his actions, and Chris own ideas to have one reason to go to Alaska. Chris McCandless is a
humble person, he went into the wilderness to test himself the feeling of his own belief about
taking a break from socially, to journey without the help of friends that to offer him help to make
his journey easier. Furthermore he, does not want them and his family to be part of his odyssey
journey for the sake of a test for him to survive alone without having

Into the Wild Analysis Essay
Christopher Johnson McCandless walked alone into the Alaskan wilderness with very little
equipment and food after traveling to various parts of North America during the course of two
years. Regardless of living on his own with not many things for a couple of years, Chris died alone
in a bus on the Stampede Trail in Alaska. Author Jon Krakauer wrote a 9,000 word article titled
"Death of an Innocent" for the 1993 issue of the magazine Outside. Into the Wild is simply an
extension of that article which explains what provoked Chris into living such a life, who he was,
and how he died. The author proves to the reader that Chris was an intelligent man by explaining his
research about edible plants and his ambition which builds up Chris's...show more content...
This shows that Wayne Westerberg "was both shorthanded and very busy so [Westerberg] asked
McCandless to postpone his departure [but] McCandless wouldn't even consider it." Westerberg
even offers to buy Chris a plane ticket so that Chris would be able to still make it to Alaska by the
time he wanted to and still work an extra ten days. Although Chris refuses saying that it would be
cheating by flying, it becomes evident that he gets extremely impatient when even the slightest thing
delays him even though Chris does not have a set deadline. Chris is very intelligent and
well–educated, and his passion for his Alaska trip helps prove to other people that he is just not
doing it on a whim. The author creates Chris's credibility when Chris keeps his promise of
keeping in touch with the people he meets and having the impeccable ability to never quitting
once he starts something. Jan Burres and her husband, Bob, liked Chris very much and "when
[Chris] left, [Jan and Bob] never expected to hear from him again, but [Chris] made a point of
staying in touch." Over the course of two years, Chris sends Jan and Bob a postcard every month
or two. Without getting too attached, Chris is able to keep his promise of keeping in touch which
proves that he is reliable. Westerberg claims that Chris "was the hardest worker [Westerberg had]
ever seen" for he would do even the dirtiest of jobs

Into The Wild Rhetorical Analysis
A prosecutor's job is to find evidence to support his case against an individual accused of breaking
the law while a defense attorney tries to present evidence to prove the innocence of the person
accused. Neither can be truly be unbiased about their evidence but each of them is motivated to
confirm a particular position. Much like a defense attorney, in his biography,Into the Wild, Jon
Krakauer attempts to prove that McCandless's tragedy was not due to his incompetence or lack of
knowledge about the wild. He asserts emotions and rational onto McCandless's experience as well
as drawing similarities between his personal experience and McCandless's in order to create a more
sympathetic response from readers.
Krakauer presents many of his own assessment of McCandless's emotions and rationales that may
seem very factual to readers. These assertions allow him to further romanticize McCandless's
experience in the wilderness and reassure the characteristics he assumes about his subject. The
biographer gave an authoritative voice over McCandless when he claims "the desert sharpened the
sweet ache of [McCandless's] longing, amplified it, gave shape to it" (32). This portrayal given by
the author exemplifies McCandless's attraction for nature. And when McCandless left Franz for the
second time, Krakauer claims, "McCandless was thrilled to be on his way north, and he was
relieved as well" because he escape the "threat of human intimacy, [and] of friendship" (55). There is
little evidence to suggest that this statement is written in McCandless's diary, but this explanation
helps to sharpen readers' perception of McCandless's escape from human intimacy.
In order for readers to distance themselves from making quick judgements about McCandless, the
author gives many detailed interviews of people who have spent some time with him before and
during his journey into the wild. Those interviews follow a similar structure: they are critical of
McCandless at first but are later charmed by his intelligence and determination. In the first chapter,
Gallien has picked up McCandless on the highway and he immediately wonders "whether he'd pick
up one of those crackpots [...] liv[ing] out ill–considered Jack London fantasies" (4).

Into The Wild: A Narrative Fiction
The wind wailed while the rain drizzled swiftly on a keen, crisp, airy night. On September 20,
2001 a little, tiny baby boy was brought into this crazy world, little to know he has three older
siblings to pick on him. Phyllis and Michael could not help Zack now. Zach lives on a farm, so his
siblings are not the only wild animals living on the property. Zach has hurt and injured himself so
many times. He was a crazy child when he was younger.
When Zach was younger, he was not an ordinary kid. One time when he was younger he lived in
Leavenworth. His siblings went to school at Leavenworth, but Zach was too young to go to school.
Another time Zach was playing hide and seek with his siblings when he went to hide in the best
spot, he caught his arm on an old, rusty saw blade. His mom was scared to death when he cut his
arm, It was only a minor cut, but his mom was...show more content...
Zach watches television rarely, but when he does, he gazes at "Supernatural" and "The Walking
Dead". Wonder why he likes creatures like that? Why do the zombies look so real? Zachary is not
a stereotype boy. Zach is fifteen and already favors work. Hunting is just one of his many
hobbies. Zach slaughtered a massive buck. Zach exclaimed, "It was the biggest I have ever laid
my eyes on!" Zachary listens to music while he works. He does not have a favorite type of music,
it just depends on his mood. Playing with his dogs, Zach loves to run and play. Zach also likes to ride
fourwheelers. He loves his grandad so much. Role model is a big part in Zach's life. His grandad is
his role model. Because his grandad is hardworking, Zach looks up to him. His grandad owned a
farm, one day zach hopes to own his own farm. Zach loves to help his father herd cattle and tends
to animals. He loves to help his father and help with crops. His role model unfroturily died this
past year. His grandad was an amazing guy. Zach will alway love him. Not all the time zach is having

Essay On Nonconformity In Into The Wild
Much of the human race live their lives in accordance to what society sees as acceptable, but
Christopher McCandless disregards societal norms in the novel Into the Wild. Within the novel, Jon
Krakauer explores the story of Christopher McCandless's journey to Alaska and investigates the
events leading up to his death. Krakauer tells the story concerning McCandless's life in a fashion
that reveals a truth about nonconformity. Krakauer sends a message to common readers that
nonconformity is not possible and the only way to survive the world we live in is to conform to our
surroundings. Jon Krakauer express's his ideals on nonconformity within Into the Wild through his
non–chronological organizational structure, the use of logical reasoning,...show more content...
Krakauer uses research about the life of McCandless in order to establish his ethos and convey
his thesis of the novel. When Krakauer presents the information concerning McCandless's death,
he quotes directly from the moose hunters who found him dead and describes the exact setting of
the situation. Krakauer beings by explaining the scene at which the moose hunters found him, "A
few hundred yards beyond the river the trail disappeared" (Krakauer 12). Krakaurer's use of
description enables readers to visualize the scene better and create a major sense of trust between
the author and reader. Krakauer then imbeds a quote directly from the moose hunters that found
McCandless's body who explains that there was "a real bad smell from inside" (Krakauer12).
Appealing to the reader's sense of smell, and also using the perspective of the exact people that
found McCandless's body, establishes a more ethical appeal to the audiences trust in the
information the author is presenting. Also, Krakauer cites an exact note found on the bus where
McCandless was discovered which states that he is "Near death" (Krakauer 12). The note
displayed in the text is written in a different font, implying that the proceeding text is written by a
different author, and is also signed by McCandless himself. The research Krakauer did is directly
shown here because of his factual evidence. The use of factual information from the scene of the
death provides a

Into The Wild Theme Essay
In 1990 at the age of 22, Chris McCandless started his journey to travel the country and live off the
land alone. He survived well until he hitchhiked to Alaska in 1992. Chris thought that if he could
make it there, he could make it anywhere. Four months after going off the grid in the Alaskan
wilderness, his decomposed body was discovered by a party of hunters. The nonfiction novel, Into
the Wild by Jon Krakauer, is his story. It has many important themes that define the life of Chris
McCandless. A couple themes, for example, are having the feeling of ultimate freedom and seeking
happiness through a personal challenge. The theme of having complete freedom is displayed
throughout the story in many ways. Chris is one of those people who does not like to follow rules
set by anyone other than himself. He certainly did not like anyone telling him what to do. His father
...show more content...
Everyone personally wants something different. Chris wanted to be able to survive for as long as
he could without utilizing the help of any human soul. He learned and studied how to butcher
northern animals, which berries and mushrooms were safe, and how to survive in the harsh
Alaskan cold; however, sometimes the limitations on specific goals needed to be taken into
consideration. Believing that there was nothing he could not do, he may have had too much
confidence, which could possibly be a bad thing. He exclaims to Jim Gallien, a truck driver giving
him a lift just before he walks into the wilderness, "'I won't run into anything I can't deal with on
my own'" (6). His inability to see the restrictions of what he cannot do may have eventually led to
his death. In his defense, he was not on a suicide mission; he was prepared not to make it out alive.
Chris knew the risks he was taking but saw it as a personal challenge that needed to be

Into the Wild Essay
Dec 9, 2009
Paper #2
Into the Wild
Into the Wild is a book about a young man named Chris McCandless and his decision to go off and
live in the wild. He decided to walk deep into the Alaskan wilderness and abandon all of his
possessions and family. This book is the authors, Jon Krakauer, version of Chris McCandless' story
put together through interviewing and speaking with people who knew Chris as well as by using
letters Chris wrote to his loved ones.
In my opinion on what motivated Chris McCandless to venture off into the wild was his need to get
out of mainstream society and to not live the life that was originally planned out for him. On his
journey to Mt. McKinley, Alaska, he met some friends. One in particular was Ron Franz who...show
more content...
Chris is saying that there is no greater pleasure in life than to be able to start over every day that
you can. Chris is saying that everyday should be and is a different beginning and that it is a
privilege to be able to have a new day every day. Chris is saying that you shouldn't live your life in
the same way every day because then you won't experience true happiness. And that being able to
have a different beginning each day is an opportunity that you should take advantage of instead of
living life in the same way because there is no point or reason to living that way.
"S.O.S. I need your help. I am injured, near death, and too weak to hike out of here. I am all alone,
this is no joke. In the name of God, please remain to save me. I am out collecting berries and shall
return this evening. Thank you, Chris McCandless. August ? (pg. 12)" – Chris McCandless
I wanted to reflect on this quote because it's not your typical quote and it's from the heart. Chris
McCandless wrote this note on a torn page from a novel by Nikolay Gogol and it was found taped
to his bus door. The note stated that he was injured and was in need of help. He stated that he was
near death and practically too weak to hike to safety and was alone. In the note, he sounded very
desperate and panicked. He seemed helpless, courageous and at the same time regretful. He seemed
helpless because he stated that he was injured and in need of help. He seemed courageous because

Into The Wild Literary Analysis
Literary Argument:
In Into the Wild, Krakauer alludes to the works of Leo Tolstoy, Henry David Thoreau, and Jack
London to show how Chris McCandless' infatuation with existentialist literature influenced his
decision to leave society behind and venture into the wild.
Outline:
Throughout Into the Wild, many authors are mentioned and alluded to by Krakauer, the most
significant of these being Leo Tolstoy,Henry David Thoreau, and Jack London. Krakauer uses these
allusions to illustrate how Chris McCandless was heavily influenced by these writers with whom he
was so fascinated.
Krakauer alludes to the writing of Russian novelist Leo Tolstoy to show the similarities between him
and McCandless.
Krakauer uses allusions to and excerpts from Tolstoy's writing to demonstrate how his wish for
adventure and a nontraditional lifestyle inspired McCandless and led him to have many similar ideals.
Tolstoy was a Russian Novelist who longed for a nontraditional lifestyle far from his noble lineage
("Leo Tolstoy").
"Stubborn and arrogant, Tolstoy refused to ally himself with any particular intellectual school of
thought. Declaring himself an anarchist, he made off to Paris in 1857" ("Leo Tolstoy").
Tolstoy was morally opposed to a structured lifestyle and searched for an exciting adventure that he
believed would leave him feeling fulfilled.
McCandless identified with Tolstoy's longing for adventure and excitement.
"I wanted movement and not a calm course of existence. I wanted excitement

Logos In Into The Wild
Many people wish they can drop everything important to them and isolate themselves from
society; very few people will even attempt this, but Chris McCandless breaks societal norms to
accomplish this goal. In Into the Wild, John Krakauer tells the story of this young man's life to
inspire the audience to chase their dreams through the use of logos, involved sentence, and
anecdotes. Throughout the novel, Krakauer conveys the idea of following one's heart to reach a
sense of self completion. He became quite erudite on McCandless's life to accurately portray his
inspiring story. In order to strengthen his thesis, he includes facts from McCandless's journey
starting from Atlanta, Georgia and ending on the Stampede Trail in Fairbanks, Alaska. He begins
by first announcing the death of McCandless, followed by detailed stories of when he was alive,
then an analyzation of his death towards the end of the novel. The audience becomes informed on
McCandless's odyssey as Krakauer goes into specific detail to give the readers a larger insight on
his last couple of months alive. By doing so, the audience is impacted by the inclusion of precise
aspects of McCandless's life; it helps them see what he went through to follow what his heart
desired. When McCandless travels up north, he meets Wayne Westerberg in "Carthage, South
Dakota, population 274..." (Krakauer 15). Krakauer includes the specific population of this town to
show how few people reside there in order to correctly document the

Into the Wild
Rhett Jackson
English 12B: American Literature
15 March 2012 Into the Wild Temperament Type Analysis The novel Into the Wild is a nonfiction
novel published by Jon Krakauer who investigated the life and death of a free spirited individual
named Christopher McCandless. McCandless was a recent Emory University graduate who sought
to suck the marrow out of life through an independent experience in nature and purposely sought to
this experience in the rawest form of supplies. He was found dead in August of 1992 in an
abandoned bus in the Alaskan wilderness. For the sake of his journey, he purposely didn't bring an
adequate amount of food or supplies. Consequently, those who read of his actions wonder what
evoked him to live the way he...show more content...
Christopher's true frustrations were unveiled when he learned of his parents offering to buy him a
new car, "I've told them a million times that I have the best car in the world, a car that has spanned
the continent from Miami to Alaska, a car that I will never trade in, a car that I am very strongly
attached to––yet they ignore what I say and think I'd actually accept a new car from them!" These
words empowered his actions to the fullest extent. In addition to not wanting a new car, he states,
"I'm going to let them think they are right...And then with one abrupt, swift action I'm going to
completely knock them out of my life...I'll be through with them once and for all." This course of
action is indeed what Christopher McCandless did. On the other hand, extroverts, mainly obtain their
energy from other people and would probably never be able to abstain from communication from
vital family members. 2ND: When it comes to the sensing and intuitive preferences, Christopher was
a sensing type of individual. According to the Temperament Type andInto the Wild Notes, sensing
individuals attend to various events in the present moment. Christopher doesn't plan out the various
details of his journey in a universal order, pack the essential necessities or set a planned agenda; he
lives in the current moment. For example, when his yellow Datsun gets destroyed he decides to
simple leave it behind. He doesn't scavenge to attempt to

Into the Wild Essay
Once an individual dies, his true intentions and feelings can never be known. People can speculate
all they want, but unless they have had similar experiences as the individual, they must refrain all
judgments. In the nonfiction work Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer, many readers have harshly
judged the main character, Chris McCandless, as stupid and thoughtless for his dangerous and
ultimately fatal adventure in the raw wilderness of Alaska; many have even said he had been
suicidal. The author attempts to display Chris as a human being with meaningful intentions and
emotional yearning rather than just a stereotypical, reckless vagabond by using his own story as a
similar experience to Chris', so readers can begin to understand Chris from a...show more content...
Krakauer and Chris not only have the same mindset and views about dangerous expeditions, but
also the same eventual epiphany. Both are voluntary outcasts of society who view people as
problematic and immoral, as exemplified in their conflict with their fathers. Both also realize,
however, the value and comfort of sharing happiness within a society. Krakauer initially believes
loneliness is best, but he is only lying to himself, for "the pleasure I'd felt in this woman's company
– exposed my self–deceit and left me hollow and aching" (137). After spending some time alone
and away from society on his mountain climbing journey, Krakauer still has not found any
enlightenment about life but only begins to understand that he is only truly happy in the presence
of others. This relates back to Chris McCandless because at the end of his long, isolated
expedition in Alaska, he ironically came to the conclusion that "happiness [is] only real when
shared" (189). Chris initially believes that the right way to live is by finding answers in solitude;
however, after experiencing that solitude, he concludes that a society is necessary for people to
thrive and be happy. Thus, by both Krakauer and Chris's relevation, the author is able to send a
thematic

Essay on Film Analysis: Into the Wild
Many live attempting to decipher the riddle of life. What is life? What is the purpose? What
makes? Even though we only seek happiness why can't we ever seem to achieve it? When we do
reach happiness why can't we seem to grasp it and hold it for more than the few short hours that
pass like seconds? The question we must answer first is "What makes happiness, true?" In the
film "Into the Wild" it shows Chris, a young adult, trying to make his way to Alaska. His beliefs in
freedom and isolation from the modern world would drive him to go to Alaska in hope that he finds
the so simple goal, happiness. He struggle sand faces obstacles that hinder him to his destination.
Odd people, intelligent people, elderly people, young people; he met all...show more content...
But what is the answer to the question of "What makes happiness true?" In the poem, "Happiness
Is Not Comforts" by Dr. John Celes, it states "Happiness is in making and seeing the less fortunate
ones, smile." This can tell us that happiness isn't just about personal desire but also about others
around you. Happiness is nothing when everyone is sad around you. This poem also shows how
sharing with others gives the feeling. The same characteristic are explained in all three pieces
described. This poem answers the question by explaining that happiness is caused not by what you
surround yourself by who you surround yourself with. It attempts to tell us that comforts are just
empty feelings that fade quickly. But things like giving to others, showing love and compassion
towards other, and going out of your way to do little things for someone is what gives a full
happiness. The other poem that helps answer the question of what makes happiness real is in the
poem "Happiness" by Juan OIivarez. The poem literally states that not being alone made him feel
and experience true happiness. This list the things that makes him feel happy and it just the little
simple things such as walking in the rain, going home and seeing family that he hasn't seen in a long
time. This piece answer the question by suggesting that little things and being with people that love
you and want to be with you is what makes happiness true.

Key Themes In Into The Wild
While viewing the film, Into the Wild, there were many themes occurring that corresponded to what
we learned in class. Some of the most prominent topics were Chris' upbringing, his relationships with
others, and most importantly the theme of independence.
To begin, the way Chris was raised and the experiences he had while growing up greatly affected
him. He grew up with a family who was well off financially, and had the opportunity to receive a
good education. But, his family had many emotional problems. It is revealed that Mr.
McCandless had two families that he supported for years. Also he had another son besides Chris
and his sister. Discovering this was a traumatic experience for him. Also his parents often had
arguments that would lead to physical fights. This was a stress that was added to Chris' life and
was a bad example on how a married couple should act. Therefore, the way Chris was raised was a
topic that was commonly discussed throughout the movie.
Secondly, on his journey to Alaska Chris met several people who left lasting impressions on him
under the name Alexander...show more content...
It was sad that Chris was so upset with his life that he felt he needed to go to the Alaskan
wilderness to be happy. Also, I felt bad for the narrator of the movie, his sister Carine, because she
was left with the aftermath of everything, she was very close with her brother, and shared many of
the same struggles as Chris. At the end of the film I had mixed emotions of happiness and sadness.
After spending some time in Alaska , Chris planned on returning to society. But, he didn't plan on
the river he crossed to become impossible to get back over and leave. So, he was stuck with almost
no supplies and started to lose it. This solitude he had once craved quickly became the bane of his
existence. Eventually Chris died of a mixture of things. I felt bad that he was stranded, but also felt
happy that he found his unconventional

Into The Wild Transcendentalism Analysis
Transcendentalism is an idea shared by many famous 19th century authors. Ralph Waldo
Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, Jon Krakauer, and Michael Donovan all believe in the idea of
transcendentalism and it is shown in many of their literary works. Many of the authors show a
nonconformist character in their story or poem. Some of them portray themselves as the
nonconformist. Nonconformists believe that you should find and be yourself. They also believe
that you should never change yourself to fit in with the world or society. In Krakauer's book, Into
the Wild, he displays a character, Chris McCandless, who wants to live off the land to prove he
can live on his own. Krakauer states that Chris "intended to invent an utterly new life for himself,
one in which he would be free to wallow in unfiltered experience. To complete the severance from
his previous life, he even adopted a new name." Emerson shows that the character is a nonconformist
when he uses the phrase "unfiltered experience" to explain how society filtered the world with rules
and orders. Krakauer also states that Chris wanted...show more content...
They both use their stories to convey their own interpretation of the idea. Emerson uses his short
story to convey the message that the individual is the world. He also proposed that the world is part
of an over–soul. His message is displayed in "Nature." Emerson says, "I see all; the currents of the
Universal Being circulate through me." This proves the idea of the individual being the world. On
the other hand, Thoreau shows a different perspective on the idea. He shows his interpretation of
transcendentalism by using the government as his example. He explains just how controlling the
government can be and makes a powerful statement. He states that "The government is best which
governs least." This shows his nonconformist view of transcendentalism, meaning that he doesn't
want the government to control his

Into The Wild Research Paper
As humans, we are compelled to take risks, even when the privilege is unavailable. Without a
proper role model in life, for example parents, being inept, we go out in daily life and venture, and
with venturing risks are involved. This is what Zlatan IbrahimoviД‡ a world–famous soccer player,
and Chris McCandless, the main character of Into the Wild, by Jon Krakauer went through in life,
a proper role model was not present. The men in riding giants a documentary by Stacy Peralta, like
Greg Noll, just left everything behind back at home to experiment with their lives by surfing.
Nobody stopped any of them from going, because nobody cared enough. Getting out there every
day in the water was a risk of losing their lives. Zlatan, Chris, and Greg...show more content...
The hardships could have been through being young without proper education, to making wrong
choices in life. Ultimately this was life for them, and they had to accept life, but they didn't. All
three of them ventured with their lives, taking unruly risks, but it lead them to believe why they
belong in this world. Zlatan changing lives, Greg introducing a new culture, and Chris leaving
everyone with the question, why? When young, without proper parental education and direction,
it can send us into a path where risk is involved, but in the end, it will often benefit us because we
will be true to ourselves and know why we are where we are. The action of taking risk will lead us
as young humans to believe why belong and what can we

Into The Wild Thesis
Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer – Thesis Statement Jon krakauer sympathizes Christopher
McCandless living life to the fullest and moving beyond the box. Having to feel the measures of
pain and other feelings that about. Krakauer he was not accustomed to. He was blank he couldn't
take the pressure so he went alone. Outside Fairbank there was an electrician named Jim Gallien
that picked up a hitchhiker who goes by the name Alex, but further into the story he introduces
himself as Chris McCandless. Gallien is concerned that Chris said he was 24, he is not prepared for
the couple of numerous days he said he is going to do in Alaska Denali National Park. The
individual who picked up and drove Chris asked some questions about his hunting permit due to the
fact that he was a young person carrying a 0.22 caliber...show more content...
Krakauer relates that Westerberg, then overseeing a barley harvest in Montana, picked up
McCandless while he was hitchhiking. Westerberg remembers him as restless asand handsome,
with a sensitive face and a lean physique. He said that women would have found him attractive,
but also describes his face as alternating between a joker and slack. Alex was engaging and
friendly. Westerberg decided to let him sleep in his trailer overnight when it started to rain.
McCandless stayed for three days in Westerberg to come to South Dakota for a job whenever he
needed it. McCandless arrived few weeks later, and Westerberg gave him a place to stay and a job
on one of his grain elevators. McCandless worked hard enough that Westerberg was impressed. He
also learned that McCandless was intelligent and liked to read. In addition, Westerberg recalls
finding out from a tax form that McCandless, who had introduced himself as Alex, was named
Christopher. Westerberg decided not to ask questions, however. McCandless apparently enjoyed
living with Westerberg, cooking for and going drinking with the other people in the

Into the Wild
In the book Into the Wild, characters Chris McCandless, Gene Rosellini and Everett Ruess are all
characters with similarities and differences. Each character has a different family background and
personality. Every character also had a different experience in the wilderness and way they
documented it. Lastly, McCandless, Rosellini, and Ruess all had different ways they died.
No individual had the same family background and early experiences in their lives. Each
individual also had their own personalities. Chris McCandless was a young and successful college
graduate with a job and had money. Oddly, he decided to disappear in response to his father's
misjudgment, giving away his money and overall, became homeless. McCandless could no longer
...show more content...
He continued to reject society as an adult and became an outdoorsman and lover of nature. Like
McCandless, Ruess also disliked his parents and was close to his siblings (similar to McCandless).
Ruess was a poet and when he graduated high school in Hollywood. He quickly disliked the city,
and found life in the wilderness.
Each individual had unique experiences in the wild, and documented them differently. Chris
McCandless lived with very little in the wilderness. He was unprepared. Krakauer used frequent
excerpts from Chris's personal journals. Only Chris's final journal entries were written in the first
person and were signed with his real name. His final words had a frightening tone. Gene Rosellini
also lived with very little. He wished to return to his "natural state." Rosellini ate berries, roots, and
seaweed. He hunted with spears and snares and dressed in rags. Ruess crossed the wilderness of the
Southwest on foot, sending letters home to his family in Los Angeles that were filled with wisdom.
He experienced lots of physical discomfort during his time outdoors.
Each character also had different ways they died. Chris McCandless passed away before he had a
chance to return to civilization. Chris died of starvation in the Alaskan wilderness. Gene Rosellini
concluded that his attempt to live off the land was a failure after thirty years and then committed
suicide by knife.

Into The Wild Essay Thesis

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Empfohlen

Empfohlen (20)

Into The Wild Essay Thesis