Persuasive Essay Death Penalty

Persuasive Essay On The Death Penalty
The Death penalty has been a part of society and its legal system for centuries; it became a necessary
punishment to dangerous crimes and a way to liberate the community from dangerous criminals.
However, now this type of punishment is seen as crime against humanistic values by many, and is
questionable in the legal system. It has resulted in a range of inconsistency with the laws on this
issue. Nations including China, the US, Iran, Belarus, and others keep the death penalty as an
option, while others like Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and almost all European nations have put
an to capital punishment. This paper will seeks to demonstrate that death penalty has been preserved
as a valid means of preventing serious crimes. It will explore...show more content...
Compared to 260 in China and 230 in Iran, becoming the runner–up with a total number of 159
(Wikipedia). For most nations, the death penalty is used to punish war crimes or crimes resulting in
physical injury. In Asia, the death penalty is used to punish drug–related crimes, even though these
crimes do not result in physical injury.
The anti–death penalty movement calls to repeal this measure that has been upheld by various
international organizations. For instance, "the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the
Child, which among other things forbids capital punishment for juveniles, has been signed and
ratified by all countries except the USA and Somalia" (Wikipedia). Some international representative
such as the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and
the Sixth Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights have been accepted, although they
only bind nations that have endorse them. Organizations like the European Union require new
members to prohibit the death penalty as a condition of entry. There is a powerful movement with
tremendous pressure on nations to cancel it. Currently there are two prominent organizations
fighting against the death penalty, they are the Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.
The issues surrounding the discussion of death penalty focus on two main points. First, this
punishment is assets from a purely utilitarian perspective. In order to understand and
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Death Penalty is the ultimate punishment. There is no harsher punishment than death itself. In the
early colonial days a man named George Kendall was executed for treason. In 1972, Furman VS
Georgia successfully brought a temporary end to the death penalty for ten years. Pro capital
punishment individuals claim that it is an efficient deterrence against criminals.
The death penalty is a capital punishment that is put into effect for major crimes. There was a
period of time where the death penalty was banned for about four years in 1972–1976. The death
penalty is very controversial topic in the United States. However death penalty is inhumane and
should be abolished in the United States. Many feel that death pen is justice because it is retribution
toward criminals who have committed heinous crimes.
Death penalty does not only deter crimes, but it also very expensive. The death penalty costs so
much because of the appeal process. Many assume that abolishing the death penalty is wrong
because it becomes unfair. Death penalty has always been one of the most hotly debated issues in the
United States. The eighth amendment is designed to protect us from cruel and unusual punishment.
In the United States, many crimes are committed every day, people are killing one another, raping
innocent children. People who have committed a crime should be punished and punished harshly and
those whom commit harm to other people should die. There are many reasons why the death penalty
should be

Since the beginning of time there has always been the question of what to do with someone that
has committed a serious offense that has resulted in serious injury or even death to a person. The
death penalty has always been a topic of whether it is humane or inhumane to put someone to
death over their crimes against another human being. The death penalty to some is either
acceptable to where a person should be put t death for their crimes or is not doing anything to
deter people from committing crimes. the death penalty is starting to become less of a
punishment and more of a costly expense to taxpayers whom for "Each death penalty case in
Texas costs taxpayers about $2.3 million." The death penalty for some think it should be
abolished while others would rather see it extended. The death penalty has been dated back to the
"Ancient Law of China" but it's mostly known during the time of "King Hammurabi where the
death penalty was given for 25 different crimes". The first actual recorded death penalty usage
was set during the "16th century where one was accused of magic, and ordered to take his own
life". In America, the first person known to be put to death was "Captain George Kendall" for
allegedly "being a spy for Spain." What seems to make America's first interpretation of the death
penalty is that it was even used for "minor offenses such as stealing grapes, killing chickens, and
trading with Indians". The death penalty is a way for those to punish people for their

Persuasive Essay Against Death Penalty
Some people think that self–defense is justified by trying to save your own life but if the murder is
committed on purpose, the murderer obviously does not value life; therefore, why should he/she
be allowed to live when they deprived another human being of this privilege, life? Other people
disagree and think that since the murderer does not value life and commits a crime, the law should
not be taking the same path and contradict itself by sentencing the murderer to death. Why kill
people who kill people to show killing is wrong. Putting people to death to prove that we are
against killing does not make any sense. That statement contradicts the country's belief method.
Thus, death penalty is wrong. The death penalty has been a controversial issue for a long time, and
has its pros as well as its cons. The way it is applied varies from state to state and depends on
different variables. Some may argue that death penalty punishment is inhumane, against most
common religious beliefs, does not reduce the crime, costs a lot more than life in prison, and worst of
all, executions of innocent people, while others are convinced that it is the most effective and
inexpensive way of eliminating dangerous people from the society. However, at the end of the
day, as a society we need to move away from the "eye for an eye" revenge simply because it will
not solve any problem and will not prove anything, the obvious is that by striking back at the enemy,
the only outcome is an endless cycle of violence. Death penalty sends the wrong message.
First, let's explain what death penalty is and go over its history. Death penalty is an act to put a
person to death by law and a legal system to punish and make sure the person does not commit any
future crimes. Death penalty is referred to as capital punishment because historically it meant losing
one's head. Back in the eighteenth century, people were put to death if they were stealing, did not
follow the religion from where they belonged, disobeyed their king or even were thought to be a
witch. They were publicly burned, hung or their head would be cut off to set an example. Nowadays,
types of executions have changed; the modern world uses mostly execution by lethal injection, which

A Persuasive Speech On The Death Penalty
Persuasive Speech:
Why I Believe the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished Hello, everyone. My name is Devlin
O'Connell and I am going to be speaking to you today about why I believe the death penalty should
be abolished. There are three factors that I base this argument off which surround ethics, efficiency,
and expenditure. In relationship to ethics, I would like to begin with a quote by human rights
activist, Desmond Tutu, "To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice."Capital
Punishment, also known as the Death Penalty, is described as a government practice where a person
is put to death by the state as a punishment for crimes such as murder, treason, espionage, and
genocide. While it may seem unlikely that many people would be convicted of a few of the latter
crimes, there were nearly 3,000 people on death row in the last year. Of those 3,000 people, 117
were found to be innocent. It is predicted that at least 3% more of those sentenced would have been
exonerated with enough time and resources. Let that sink in. An untold number of innocent people
have been executed. As it is, many relatives of victims have said that they do not wish for their
relative's killer to be put to death. Circling back to Tutu's quote, the government is not providing
these families with justice – but with revenge.
We are "perpetuating a cycle of violence unworthy of a civilized society," to quote Bernice King,
"retribution cannot light the way to the genuine healing that

Persuasive Essay Pro Death Penalty
The death penalty is a form of punishment, which is given to a felon that has committed a major
crime and requires for the criminal to be sentenced to death. Capital punishment was a custom of the
government and society for thousands of years as a way to "justify" the crimes of felons and is
unfortunately is still present in communities around the world. The death penalty is frequently a form
of punishment in asian and middle eastern countries and still resides in parts of the USA also.
Capital punishment affects many lives including the very criminals who are sentenced to death. Not
only is the death penalty an immoral way to pay for a crime, but the very method is inhumane. Lethal
injection is the most popular form of execution in the...show more content...
This punishment is given as a consequence to a person who has committed a major felony and the
government feels that the only way to condone the crime is to pay the forfeit of his life. Capital
punishment is believed to act like a deterrence to criminals, but according to the US Census in 2006,
South Carolina, which inhabits the punishment is number one in violent crime rates, with 766
crimes per every 100,000 people, while the state of Maine that does not have the death penalty ranks
50th in all the states with an outstanding 116 violent crimes per every 100,000 population. In
addition, a recent study of the United States top criminologists proved that the death penalty does not
deter violent crimes. The study in the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology states that 88% of
the US' most prestigious criminologist believed that the death penalty did not prevent homicide and
75% of the experts surveyed agreed that "debates about the death penalty distract Congress and state
legislatures from focusing on real solutions to crime problems". This demonstrates that despite the
death penalty, crimes are still present and not only does it remain to make an impact on these
felonies, it shows that the places without the penalty are much more prosperous with their crime

There are diverse capital punishment, the death penalty is one of them. Considered as a deviant
and barbaric act, the use of this method reflects the opposite view or the wrong message of what
the society teaches us. Encouraging the death penalty is not different from encouraging a murder
and by operating in such a way actually violates a fundamental law set forth by the federal
government which is " Murder is an illegal crime". For years, the death penalty has been seen as
the best way to prevent assassination as it makes murderers reconsidering their ideas before they
act. However, this method will always be considered as barbaric since it takes someone's life.
Moreover, we have learned through ages that death penalty has, for a few times,taken innocent lives.
Do not people deserve a second chance ? Anyone seeks for it.After all, the freedom of living is the
most basic human right that anyone dreams about. Nearly two–thirds of the countries throughout the
world seem to understand how awful can this be for death–row prisoners and their relatives.They
decided to stop using the death penalty. It has been literally abolished. Many countries still using this
capital crime, as it is the case of the United States. The U.S government, the U.S military, and
thirty–one States, including Indiana, have the death penalty in their federal book. In Indiana, the
death penalty is only imposed to whom the crime of murder has been attributed and if it violates at
least one of the

Persuasive Essay On Death Penalty
Death Penalty Since the year 1976, around 1,462 people in the United States have been executed by
lethal injection. Practiced in 31 states and abolished in 19 the death penalty has remained a center
stone of debate since its launch in 1976. With so many differing viewpoints, arguments pertaining to
the moral issue, legal considerations and possible alternatives have been left unsettled since. The
ongoing tug–of–war within these topics slowly tries to chip away at the big question. Should the
death penalty be allowed? Morality and human psychology show up as clear underlining factors
when it comes to crossing the line between life and death. Many believe an eye–for–an–eye form of
punishment is justifiable while others strongly disagree on...show more content...
In their eyes, the death of murders relieves the burning vengeance and pain victims loved ones go
through. Opponents argue against the thought of revenge and any connection it has towards justice
or fulfilling the grief of death. They argue that vengeance only makes things worse and extends the
chain of violence, claiming "it has no place in our justice system." Along with moral issues, social
unfairness such as poverty and race have always been woven into concern among the two sides.
One argument touches on the economic state of the convicted and how it affects his/her chances of
being executed. People of poverty don't have the money to hire a good legal representative leaving
them with a weak defense against their crime. "I don 't know of any affluent people who have been
sentenced to death," said Walter Berns, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute in
Washington. People of poverty who are given a representative by the state find that often that their
defendant is ill experienced and underpaid. "Court–appointed death penalty lawyers are paid barely
enough to cover costs, are usually inexperienced, and often don 't put up much of a fight," said
Stephen Bright, director of the Southern Center for Human Rights in Atlanta. This imbalance in
equity on an economic level also rings true on an ethnic level through racial bias. "In 82% of the
studies

Persuasive Speech Pro Death Penalty
What is the death penalty? What is its purpose? Do you know anyone that has went through it?
Well first, I would like to say good afternoon. I will be speaking on the crucial subject of death
sentences. The death penalty has always been a topic of discussion for many centuries, and has been
given to people legally convicted of capital crime, typically murder. People in support of this act
believe that convicted murderers must face execution as a consequence for their actions. Others
against it believe that the penalty is nothing but legalized murdering and is immoral. The death
penalty has been widely used in the United States as I think the death penalty should be banned
because we pay millions for the death penalty system, it puts innocent lives at risk, and there's a
better option to consider which is life without parole.
The death penalty should be banned because, first, we pay millions for the death penalty system.
Oregonians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty organization stated, "Washington county murder
cases cost more than 1.5 million." Also the organization stated that, "It's estimated that the total
prosecution and defense costs to the state and countries equal 9 million per year." Another piece of
evidence stated that "the Oregon Judicial Department would save 2.3 million annually if the death
penalty were eliminated." This proves and gives an example of how the Washington county murder
cases in Oregon are costly, and the death penalty would even

Joshua McCray
POLS 230
Benjamin Bricker
Final Paper 12/8
The death penalty disproportionately targets minorities especially African Americans. In the United
States of America there is an unequal and unfair burden against African Americans in the criminal
justice system. In 2011, African Americans were only 13.6% of the American population (Rastogi,
Johnson, Hoeffel, & Drewery, 2011). However, African Americans in 2011 made up 42% of the total
death row population (Snell, 2011). Although a minority of the total population in theUnited States,
African Americans make the majority of inmates on death row facing execution. Furthermore, the
death penalty in many states is used as tool that following the racial legacy of Jim Crow laws.
Sentences resulting in death are higher in states with a history of lynching (Schweizer 92). States
with a history of lynching are predominately found in the Southern United states. The Southern
United states has the highest population of death row inmates. In 2009 alone there were 1,630
inmates currently on death row in the South compared to 226 in the North and only 988 in the West
(Schweizer 92). In addition, the race of the victim often will determine the sentence. Results from the
Baldus Study suggested evidence of racial disparity in the state of Georgia based on the victims race
(Schweizer 92). The Baldus study argued African American defendants who committed murdered
white individuals had much higher probability of receiving the death penalty. Prosecutors in Georgia
pursued a verdict of death in 80% of their cases if the defendant was African American and the
victim was white (Schweizer 92). This is purely racial discrimination and prejudice. Finally, "Since
1977, the overwhelming majority (77%) off death row defendants have been executed for killing
white victims, even though African Americans make up about half of all homicide victims
(Amnesty International)."The race of the both the victim and perpetrator in criminal is irrelevant.
The purpose is to bring justice to the victim, and if the defendant is found guilty give an appropriate
sentence in regards to his crime. This means that the race of the defendant should be irrelevant in
determining the sentence. The death

Capital punishment, more commonly referred to as the death penalty, is a government sanctioned
practice in which one is sentenced to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. It is often
carried out in several methods ranging from lethal injection to hanging. It has been around in the
United States since the early 1600s. As of 2017, 31 states in the U.S allow the death penalty
whereas 19 states have abolished it. Death penalty is considered to be one of the most
controversial issues in the United States. There have been several Supreme Court rulings in the past
regarding the death penalty, such as Gregg v.Georgia. The death penalty is also a debatable issue in
terms of how it is educated to the students since some textbooks have a biased viewpoint. The death
penalty should be kept in the United States due to the fact that justice must be served for when a
person commits heinous crimes such as murder.
First of all, the Eighth Amendment forbids the act of cruel and unusual punishment. However, it
doesn't define it. Because of this, despite the Supreme Court having ruled that the mandatory death
sentences for certain offenses are unconstitutional, it has not held that the death penalty itself can be
considered as a form of cruel and unusual punishment. This particular question as to whether or not
it's cruel and unusual punishment was first encountered by the Supreme Court in 1972 during the
case of Furman v. Georgia. In the case, the Court abolished the death penalty

Do you ever wonder what should happen to dangerous criminals? Watching the news just thinking
"huh?" Well what do you think should happen to the dangerous criminals? There are many opinions.
Some people think the only option is the death penalty. I honestly agree and disagree with that
because there are some death penalties are justified and some are not .Listen to these two cases.
Thurgood Marshall was confirmed as the nation's first African–American Supreme Court Justice.
Marshall's legacy is linked to his historic victory in 1954 as counsel in Brown v. Board of Education,
breaking down the barriers of "separate but equal" segregated public education. But he is equally
associated with his representation of capital defendants in racially...show more content...
In 1941, Marshall represented W.D. Lyons, an illiterate 21–year–old black sharecropper beaten into
confessing to murdering a white family and burning down their home. Enduring racial epithets from
an initially hostile white community, Marshall subjected the police who had framed Lyons to
withering cross–examination and showed that they had obviously lied on the stand. Lyons was
convicted and–after the U.S. Supreme Court denied his appeal–executed, but historians say the case
awakened Marshall to the ability of lawyers to empower oppressed communities. Later, Marshall
won retrials for three young African–American men who had been falsely accused of raping a
17–year–old white woman in Lake County, Florida. Two of the "Groveland Four" (a fourth young
man charged in the case had been lynched by a white mob after escaping from custody) were
wrongly sentenced to death; one of them was murdered and the other shot several times by a sheriff
while being transported to their retrial. The surviving defendant was convicted and resentenced to
death, but received a last–minute commutation. The third defendant–who was 16 at the
time–received a life sentence. In April 2017, the Florida legislature issued an apology for the
killings and wrongful convictions and asked Governor Rick Scott to issue posthumous pardons for
the four. In November 1946, Marshall nearly was murdered. Tennessee law

Death Penalty Essay
Hammurabi once said, "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." As of April 1, 2017, there were
2,843 death row inmates in the United States. Society has changed at some point over time. At some
point people have forgotten the difference between right and wrong and have forgotten that some
things aren't okay to do. People think that it is okay to kill, rape, torture, etc. They think they can do
all of this stuff and not get punished for their actions. How can we as a society think that we can
make a change in this world if people continue to do hateful things and think that those things are
okay to do? We need to continue to punish people so they understand that they will have
consequences for their actions? None...show more content...
My first story is about, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, he was "convicted of thirty counts includingmurder
related to the Boston Marathon bombing, where three victims died in the bombing, and a police
officer was killed in an attempt to avoid arrest. A verdict of death was returned by the jury for one
of the bombing deaths.". The second story is about, Daniel Troya and Ricardo Sanchez Jr, both
convicted for "killing two children, as well as their parents on the Florida Turnpike in 2006.
Allegedly because of a drug debt.", and last but not least, story number three, Dylann Roof, "he
killed nine African–American parishioners worshipping at an historic Black church in Charleston,
Virginia. He was the first person capitally prosecuted under the Shepard/Byrd Hate Crimes Act. A
jury sentenced Roof to death on January 10, 2017. The court formally imposed the sentence on
January 11." These are only four people out of the many people put to death in this country as
punishment for their horrific crimes. As we started writing this paper in class we had about
forty–five minutes to start, which maybe would have been enough time to throw out some ideas,
but, as you start reading stories of some of the people that had gotten put to death and the crimes
that they committed to get there, it was hard to stop reading them. It was disturbing to read what
some of these people did but you also cannot stop looking at

Persuasive Speech On Death Penalty
I am here to talk to you today about why the death penalty should be abolished in the United
States. The death penalty itself is a very controversial topic because it violates the moral and
ethical code most citizens of the United States share. Most other countries do not have the death
penalty, and only 31 states in the US administer the death penalty as a form of punishment for
heinous crimes. I understand it is justified in the sense that criminals are receiving what they
inflicted on others, but is there really a fair process for deciding who gets the death penalty and
who doesn't? Or in deciding who waits on death row longer than someone else? I believe the death
penalty should be abolished by the United States because it is biased, violates the moral and ethical
code of most people, and completely disregards certain amendments of the United States Constitution
such as the fifth and eighth.
Traditionally, the justice system has been biased and skewed in more ways than one. The death
penalty is a prime example of this racial injustice. According to Amnesty International, "77% of
death row inmates were executed for the killing of white victims, even though African Americans
make up half of all the homicide victims" ("Death Penalty and Race – Amnesty International USA").
An example of this claim is the story of George Stinney. On June 16, 1944, in Columbia, South
Carolina, a 14 year old African American boy named George Stinney was executed by electric
chair after he was convicted for the murder of two young white girls. Stinney was interrogated
with no lawyer present and was believed to have been forced into confessing, which now is
apparent. He was convicted in less than ten minutes by an all white jury. 70 years after his
execution, the state of South Carolina exonerated him and issued an apology to his family for his
wrongful conviction and execution (Bever 2014). The next point I am going to talk about is how
the federal government claims that deaths by the lethal injection are quick and painless. There are
plenty of problems that could occur with the administering of the drugs. For example, the mixture of
drugs could be wrong; the direction of the flow of injection can be wrong if those administering

Persuasive Death Penalty
Persuasive Essay
Is the death penalty appropriate? Or should it be banned?
The death penalty is a very effective way of justice. It is appropriate for those who deserve it. It is
often seen as a way of revenge even though it is a punishment. The death penalty should be kept.
Here are some reasons why.
The support of the death penalty has risen a lot during the past few years. North America's support
rate is about 76%. The United States has a percentage of 80%, Canada's 72%. With support rates
that high, it seems as if everyone is all for justice. With high approval rate percentages from the
people why should the government get rid of it? While there are good things about the death penalty,
there are also really bad things about it too....show more content...
When the death penalty is used the Government and taxpayers have to pay higher taxes. The bad
thing about putting someone in prison instead of the death penalty is making space for those who did
the crime. Most cases that don't end with the criminal/innocent being put to death cost about an
average of $740,000. You may think that this is a lot of money but the death penalty actually cost
more. Cases that end with the criminal/innocent receiving the death penalty cost about $1.26 million
dollars. This causes taxpayers to pay about $90,000 more than just the criminal/innocent being put in
prison. This bad because there are 714 people on death row in just California. The supplies needed
for the death penalty makes the cost go up more. Some of the drugs needed for the death penalty
cost a lot of money. Sodium thiopental, pancuronium bromide and potassium chloride, drugs needed
for the death penalty have went up to $83.55. Another drug called pentobarbital cost $1,286.86 per
execution. So, when it comes to prices prison is obviously the cheaper and smarter choice. So, the
death penalty has a lot of good sides and a lot of negative sides to it but it should be kept. The price
is a lot but it's worth the cost if you think about it. Putting the person in jail comes with the
possibility of them escaping. There should be other punishments rather than the death penalty but
until then the death penalty should be

Death penalty laws were established back in eighteenth century B.C. Back then the Code of King
Hammaurabi of Babylon classified only 25 crimes an automatic sentence to death penalty. Death
would consist of crucifixion, drowning, being beaten to death, burning alive and impalement. It
wasn't until A.D. Tenth Century that hanging became an act of punishment for thedeath penalty in
Britain. Britain later influenced America's use of death penalty which expanded more than any other
country(deathpenalty.org 2017). The death penalty meant to try and deter heinous crimes or make
one reconsider with death penalty as a thought of punishment. Although since 1976 there have been
1,459 sentenced to the death penalty and executions (deathpenalty.org 2017). Also, since 1973 there
has been 153 people exonerated and almost lost their lives over flawed evidence or testimony
(deathpenalty.org). Exonerated is to be absolved from a blame or for a fault or wrongdoing
(Merriam–Webster 2017). We run the risk of putting some innocent to death with the death penalty.
We should save the death penalty for certain crimes.
Over 150 people have been removed from death row because they were innocent. Was there for all
of these mistakes whose to say there hasn't been many innocent executed but were innocent
(deathpenalty.org 2017). The death penalty should only be applied when all evidence is valid.
Evidence is valid for example when there is physical proof, scientific evidence and reliable

The death penalty, by definition, is the punishment of execution, administered to someone legally
convicted of a capital crime. Each state has their own determinates of why someone would be given
the death penalty, for example, in Missouri, it is first degree murder, but for Alabama it is intentional
murder with 18 aggravating factors. The practice of capital punishment was brought to America by
the British and was first recorded being used in 1608 for the execution of Captain George
Kendall of Jamestown in Virginia. Nearly a century and a half later, people started to consider a
reform on capital punishment. Thomas Jefferson proposed Americas first bill to reform Virginia's
death penalty but was overruled by a vote. This bill was to make the death penalty use in cases of
murder and treason. In 1834, Pennsylvania became the first state to vow to carry out the executions
in a prison out of the public eye. Twelve years later, Michigan abolished capital punishment for all
crimes except treason. It wasn't too long after that Rhode Island and Wisconsin got rid of it all
together.
While some states were getting rid of capital punishment, most states were increasing the deeds
considered to be capital crime, especially crimes by slaves. It became illegal for slaves to
administer medicine because the slave could have used a poison instead. In 1838, Tennessee acted
to use discretionary terms to decide who was given the death penalty and who was not. Prior to this,
anyone convicted

Despite public support, the United States death penalty is a senseless waste of money
The majority of the American public continues to support the use of the death penalty despite the
fact that it appears to be losing popularity in statehouses and courthouses nationwide. Support for
capital punishment runs higher among white people who view individual responsibility as a
narrative for "true" Americans. Racial prejudice is part of that support due mainly in where they
live. The more black people you interact with on a regular basis the more it will reflect your racial
attitude. As the numbers of Black and other minorities increase, that greatly impacts White support
for capital punishment.
Gallup's annual crime poll conducted in 2015 showed that about six in ten Americans favored the
use of the death penalty for a person convicted of murder. Additionally, 40% of Americans say the
death penalty is not imposed enough. As of November 9, 2016, 31 U.S. states have the death penalty.
Nineteen states have either overturned it or abolished all together.
On the web site, deathpenaltyinfo.org, it projects that the United States has executed 1465 people
since 1976. The state–by–state database keeps track of anything related to capital punishment with
resources and stats updated on a regular basis. At the top of the list, Texas leads the U.S. as a whole,
with 545 executions, the most recent one occurred in November of 2017. In 2017, counties
throughout the 50 states imposed death

The death penalty is a very controversial topic in the United States. Capital punishment is the legally
authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime. The first established laws on this penalty
date as far back as the eighteenth century B.C. (Deathpenaltyinfo). The death penalty was suspended
from 1972 – 1976. Since its reinstatement in 1976, 1,458 people have been executed (CNN). Capital
punishment is cruel because it fits the definition, it is the murder of humans and is irreversible.
When you look up the definition, dictionary.com defines it as "willfully or knowingly causing pain
or distress to others". This describes the death penalty. It is knowingly murdering a person. The
cruel act of taking the life of a person...show more content...
Crystals of sodium cyanide are then dropped into the pail which causes a reaction to occur and
release hydrogen cyanide. In this case, the inmate dies from lack of oxygen to their brain.
Additionally, the inmate can be killed by a firing squad. In this instance, like every other, the
inmate is strapped to a chair. A doctor locates his or her heart and marks it with a target. Then, five
shooters fire at the target, killing him or her from blood loss. The last method is hanging. A noose
is put around the prisoners neck as they stand above a trap door. Once the door is opened, the
prisoner falls and their weight causes their neck to fracture, but they do not die instantaneously, the
death comes from the slow suffocation. All of these methods are cruel punishments. Executing the
death penalty an irreversible act. It takes the life of a human being. The death penalty is excessive
because replaced by the prisoner being sentenced to life without parole. one in every 25 defendants
sentenced to death is likely innocent(ACLU). An example of this is Brian Terrell. He was convicted
in 1955 for murder(Deathpenaltyinfo). After three trials, Terrell was sentenced to death and executed
in 2015(Deathpenaltyinfo)
. However, whether or not he was innocent is still up in the air. Defense investigators say that
Terrell's cousin Jermaine Johnson, who gave a testimony against Brian, later admitted that he gave a
false testimony(Deathpenaltyinfo).

The death penalty is the worst sentence you could possibly ever get during a criminal trial. Many
people think that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment because they think that no one
under any circumstance has the right to take another human beings life. I personally disagree with
this because there are many crimes in this world that I do believe deserve the death penalty due to
the severity of the crime that was committed by the perpetrator. In the United States, the death
penalty is primarily reserved for people who have been convicted of murder or other capital offenses
that are to severe to let them live out the rest of their days in maximum security prison. The U.S.
Supreme Court has ruled that capital punishment is neither unconstitutional and not cruel and
unusual punishment, and exists within the boundaries of the 8th and 14th amendments of the
constitution. There are some instances in which capital punishment has been approved for
individuals who have raped or sexually assaulted minors in some way and i think that is one of the
most heinous crimes that someone can commit and they should be put to death. Though far earlier
in the history of the United States, capital punishment was used for a wider variety and less violent
and heinous of crimes. Crimes such as arson, rape, robbery, and counterfeiting also resulted in this
ultimate penalty and the taking of the crooks life. Many crimes which are no longer issued the death
penalty in society today, such

Persuasive Essay Death Penalty

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von College Paper Writing Service Reviews

Mehr von College Paper Writing Service Reviews (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Persuasive Essay Death Penalty