1. Wiki Research Rubric
CATEGORY Exemplary
3
Proficient
2
Partially Proficient
1
Unsatisfactory
0
Selection and
Quality of
Sources
Identified highly
appropriate
sources in a
variety of
formats (books,
journals,
electronic
sources).
Identified mostly
appropriate
sources in a
variety of
formats (books,
journals,
electronic
sources).
Identified a few
appropriate sources
but made little
attempt to balance
format types.
Identified no
appropriate
sources in any
format.
Selection and
Quality of
Information
Extracted
relevant
information to
enrich the story.
Extracted mostly
relevant
information to
enrich the story.
Extracted a lot of
information which
wasn’t relevant to
enrich the story.
Extracted
irrelevant
information.
Citations/
Documentation
Cited all sources
of information
accurately to
demonstrate the
credibility and
authority of the
information
presented. (MLA)
Cited most
sources of
information in
proper format
and documented
sources to enable
accuracy
checking. (MLA)
Cited most sources
of information
improperly and
provided little or no
supporting
documentation to
check accuracy.
(MLA)
Created
citations
which were
incomplete or
inaccurate,
and provided
no way to
check the
validity of the
information
gathered.
(MLA)
TOTAL POINTS: _____/9

2. Wiki Story Rubric
TOTAL POINTS: __________ / 12
CATEGORY Exemplary
3
Proficient
2
Partially Proficient
1
Unsatisfactory
0
Grammar/Mechanics/Spelling Edits the text
with no errors in
grammar,
capitalization,
punctuation, and
spelling.
Edits the text
with minor
additional editing
required for
grammar,
capitalization,
punctuation, and
spelling.
Edits the text, but
errors in grammar,
capitalization,
punctuation and
spelling distract or
impair readability.
(3 or more errors)
Edits the text
but numerous
errors in
grammar,
capitalization,
punctuation,
and spelling
repeatedly
distract the
reader and
major revision
is required.
(more than 5
errors)
Development Beginning
creates interest,
middle is
well-developed,
and the end is
satisfying. Table
of Contents and
Layout are
excellent.
Story has a
clear and
interesting
beginning,
middle, and end.
Table of Contents
and Layout are
good.
Story has a
clear beginning,
middle, and end
but needs details
to make it
interesting.
Table of Contents
and Layout are fair.
Story does not
have a clear
beginning,
middle, or
end. It is hard
to follow.
Table of
Contents and
Layout are
disorganized.
Content Story makes
complete sense.
Writing is clear
and easy to
understand.
Main value is
clear. Research
information was
used in a very
creative way.
Writing is
pretty
understandable.
Some ideas may
be
out of place.
Main value is
pretty clear.
Research
information was
used in a creative
way.
Story is hard
to follow and
somewhat
confusing. Main
value is not clear.
Research
information was
used in a fairly
creative way.
The reader will
not be
able to
understand
this
writing. Ideas
do
not make
sense. Main
value is not
clear. Research
information
was not used.
Attractiveness Makes excellent
use
of links, font,
color,
images, audio,
video,
etc. to enhance
the presentation.
Makes good use
of links,
font, color,
images, audio,
video,
etc. to
enhance the
presentation.
Makes fair use of
links,
font, color, images,
audio, video,
etc. to
enhance the
presentation.
Makes no use
of links,
font, color,
images, audio,
video,
etc. to
enhance the
presentation.