2. The scale of the problem of
malnutrition in Africa (GNR 2016)
• 163.6 million children and women of
reproductive age are anemic
• 58 million children under age five are
too short for their age (stunting)
• 13.9 million under 5’s weigh too little
for their height (wasting)
• 10.3 million under 5’s are overweight
• 8 percent of adults over 20 years are
obese.
3. The Multiple Burdens of Malnutrition in
African Countries
Under 5 Stun ng rates ≥ 20%
Women’s Anemia rates ≥ 20%
Adult Overweight (BMI ≥ 25)
rates ≥ 35%Ethiopia, Rwanda
Ghana, Senegal
Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso,
Burundi, Cameroon, Central
African Republic, Chad,
Comoros, Congo (Republic of
The), Côte d’Ivoire, Democra c
Republic of the Con-go, Djibou ,
Eritrea, Gambia, Guinea,
Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Liberia,
Madagascar, Malawi, Mali,
Mauritania, Mozambique, Niger,
Nigeria, Sao Tome and Principe,
Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan,
Togo, Uganda, Tanzania,
Zambia, Zimbabwe
Algeria, Gabon,
Morocco, Seychelles,
Tunisia
Botswana,
Egypt,
Equatorial
Guinea,
Lesotho, Libya,
Namibia,
South Africa,
Swaziland
4. The annual cost of undernutrition in 7 African
countries (www.costofhungerafrica.com)
16.5
11.5
10.3
7.7
6.3 5.6
3.1
Ethiopia Rwanda Malawi Burkina
Faso
Ghana Uganda Swaziland
Annual cost of undernutrition (% of GDP)
6. Meeting the Malabo stunting target : the
status
(countries ranked on stunting prevalence in
%)
On course, good progress Off course, some progress Off course, no progress Insufficient data to make
assessment
7. Countries ranked according to stunting (%), lowest to
highest prevalence, and assessment of progress
towards WHA Global Nutrition 2025 target (stunting)
Rank Country
Stuntinggg
% Rank Country Stunting % Rank Country
Stuntin
g %
1 Seychelles 7.9 19 Togo 27.5 37 Tanzania 34.7
2 Tunisia 10.1 20 Zimbabwe 27.6 38 Sierra Leone 37.9
3 Algeria 11.7 21 Guinea-Bissau 27.6 39 Rwanda 37.9
4 Morocco 14.9 22 Angola 29.2 40 Sudan 38.2
5 Gabon 17.5 23 Cote d'Ivoire 29.6 41 Mali 38.5
6 Ghana 18.8 24 South Sudan 31.1 42 Chad 38.7
7 Senegal 19.4 25 Guinea 31.3 43 Zambia 40
8 Libya 21 26 Botswana 31.4 44 Ethiopia 40.4
9 Mauritania 22 27 Sao Tome and Principe 31.6 45 Central African Republic 40.7
10 Egypt 22.3 28 Comoros 32.1 46 Malawi 42.4
11 Namibia 23.1 29 Liberia 32.1 47 DRC 42.6
12 South Africa 23.9 30 Cameroon 32.6 48 Niger 43
13 Gambia 24.5 31 Burkina Faso 32.9 49 Mozambique 43.1
14 Congo 25 32 Nigeria 32.9 50 Madagascar 49.2
15 Swaziland 25.5 33 Lesotho 33.2 51 Eritrea 50.3
16 Somalia 25.9 34 Djibouti 33.5 52 Burundi 57.5
17 Kenya 26 35 Benin 34 Cape Verde No data
18 Equatorial Guinea 26.2 36 Uganda 34.2 Mauritius No data
On course, good progress Off course, some progress Off course, no progress Insufficient data to make assessment
8. Countries ranked according to exclusive breastfeeding
(EBF) of infants <6 months (%), highest to lowest
prevalence, and assessment of progress towards WHA EBF
target
Rank Country EBF Rank Country EBF Rank Country EBF
1 Rwanda 87 19 DRC 47.6 36 Algeria 25.7
2 Sao Tome & Principe 73.8 20 Gambia 46.8 37 Niger 23.3
3 Zambia 72.5 21 South Sudan 45.1 38 Mauritius 21
4 Malawi 70.2 22 Swaziland 44.1 39 Guinea 20.5
5 Burundi 69.3 23 Madagascar 41.9 40 Botswana 20.3
6 Eritrea 68.7 24 Benin 41.4 41 Nigeria 17.4
7 Lesotho 66.9 25 Tanzania 41.1 42 Comoros 12.1
8 Uganda 63.2 26 Mozambique 41 42 Cote d'Ivoire 12.1
9 Kenya 61.4 26 Zimbabwe 41 43 Tunisia 8.5
10 Cape Verde 59.6 27 Egypt 39.7 44 South Africa 8.3
11 Togo 57.5 28 Mali 37.8 45 Equatorial Guinea 7.4
12 Sudan 55.4 29 Central African Republic 34 46 Gabon 6
13 Liberia 55.2 30 Senegal 33 47 Somalia 5.3
14 Guinea-Bissau 52.5 31 Congo 32.9 48 Djibouti 1.3
15 Ghana 52.3 32 Sierra Leone 32 49 Chad 0.3
16 Ethiopia 52 33 Cameroon 28.2 Angola No data
17 Burkina Faso 50.1 34 Morocco 27.8 Libya No data
18 Namibia 48.5 35 Mauritania 26.9 Seychelles No data
On course Off course, some
progress
Off course, no progress Insufficient data to make
assessment
9. Rank Country Wasting % Rank Country Wasting % Rank Country Wasting %
1 Swaziland 2 19 Senegal 5.8 37 Egypt 9.5
2 Rwanda 2.2 20 Cameroon 5.8 38 Guinea 9.9
3 Morocco 2.3 21 Congo 5.9 39 Burkina Faso 10.9
4 Tunisia 2.8 22 Bissau 6 40 Comoros 11.1
5 Lesotho 2.8 23 Mozambique 6.1 41 Sao Tome and Principe 11.2
6 Equatorial Guinea 3.1 24 Burundi 6.1 42 Gambia 11.5
7 Zimbabwe 3.3 25 Zambia 6.3 43 Mauritania 11.6
8 Gabon 3.4 26 Libya 6.5 44 Somalia 14.9
9 Tanzania 3.8 27 Togo 6.7 45 Eritrea 15.3
10 Malawi 3.8 28 Namibia 7.1 46 Mali 15.3
11 Kenya 4 29 Botswana 7.2 47 Chad 15.7
12 Algeria 4.1 30 Central African Republic 7.4 48 Sudan 16.3
13 Seychelles 4.3 31 Cote d'Ivoire 7.6 49 Niger 18.7
14 Uganda 4.3 32 Nigeria 7.9 50 Djibouti 21.5
15 Benin 4.5 33 DRC 8.1 51 South Sudan 22.7
16 Ghana 4.7 34 Angola 8.2 Cape Verde No data
17 South Africa 4.7 35 Ethiopia 8.7 Madagascar No data
18 Liberia 5.6 36 Sierra Leone 9.4 Mauritius No data
On course Off course Insufficient data to make assessment
Countries ranked according to wasting (%), lowest
to highest prevalence, and assessment of progress towards
WHA target
10. Countries ranked according to anaemia (%),
lowest to highest prevalence, and
assessment of progress towards WHA target
Rank Country Anaemia Rank Country Anaemia Rank Country Anaemia
1 Rwanda 17.4 19 Sudan 31.5 36 Equatorial Guinea 45.4
2 Ethiopia 19.2 20 Madagascar 31.8 37 Central African Republic 46
3 Burundi 20.9 21 Algeria 32.7 38 Chad 46.6
4 Seychelles 21.2 21 Namibia 32.7 39 Niger 46.7
5 Mauritius 23.4 22 Eritrea 32.8 40 Guinea 48.4
6 Kenya 25 23 Morocco 33.1 41 Nigeria 48.5
7 Uganda 26.7 24 Egypt 34.5 42 Cote d'Ivoire 48.8
8 Lesotho 26.8 25 Cape Verde 37.9 43 DRC 49
9 Djibouti 27.1 26 Mauritania 39 44 Liberia 49.3
10 South Africa 27.6 27 Tanzania 39.6 45 Burkina Faso 49.5
11 Swaziland 27.8 28 Cameroon 41.5 46 Benin 49.6
12 Libya 27.9 29 Somalia 42.6 47 Congo 50.7
13 Tunisia 28 30 Sao Tome and Principe 42.7 48 Gabon 50.8
14 Zimbabwe 28.4 31 Mozambique 44.2 49 Togo 52.7
15 Botswana 28.5 32 Guinea-Bissau 44.6 50 Mali 56.2
16 Malawi 28.8 33 Angola 44.8 51 Ghana 56.4
17 Zambia 29.2 34 Sierra Leone 45.2 52 Senegal 57.5
18 Comoros 30.8 35 Gambia 45.3 South Sudan No data
Note: Anaemia % is most recent estimate (2011) from Stevens et al, 2013.
Key
On course Off course Insufficient data to make assessment
12. Thresholds for underlying drivers
Underlying driver Threshold corresponding to
prediction of stunting
prevalence of <15%
Unit
Total per capita calories in food
supply
2800 Kilocalories
Calories from non-staples in food
supply
50 Percent
Access to piped water 69 Percent
Access to improved sanitation 76 Percent
Female secondary school
enrollment rate
81 Percent
Ratio of female to male life
expectancy
1.072 Ratio
13. Number of African countries by number of
vulnerabilities
Number of
Vulnerabilities
Number of
Countries
Names of countries
0 0/6
1 0/14
2 4/14 Algeria, Egypt, South Africa, Tunisia
3 0/14
4 3/4 Botswana, Morocco, Sao Tome and Principe
5 6/11 Benin, CAR, Ghana, Mauritania, Namibia, Uganda
6 27/35 Angola, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Congo,
Cote d’Ivoire, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Gabon, The
Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, DRC,
Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique,
Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Togo,
Tanzania, Zimbabwe
14. Africa is off track to meet the
nutrition targets of Malabo
Declaration and Global targets
but there is hope
15. The ingredients for
success are well
known… ...and can lead
to rapid
improvements
in nutrition.
Political leadership
& SMART
commitment
Brazil
Ethiopia
Kenya
Maharashtra
Nutrition-
oriented
development
Bangladesh
Colombia
Ghana
Tanzania
Data
Systems
Guatemala
Indonesia
Peru
Strong
implementation
Argentina
Burkina Faso
Chile
16. Commitment by African Countries
The African Leaders for Nutrition (ALN)
Malabo Declaration:
Bring down stunting to 10%
and underweight to 5%
by 2025
Initiative for Food and Nutrition Security in Africa
(IFNA)
2nd International Conference on Nutrition: Framework
for Action and the UN Decade of Action on Nutrition
17. Conclusion
• Make the right political choice—supported by SMART
commitments for accountability
• Current commitments do not match the need
• we need a blend of nutrition specific, and nutrition
sensitive actions, supported by an enabling environment
• Predictable and dedicated nutrition financing is essential:
Invest more and allocate better
• Reject business as usual
• Invested in more and better data
the nutrition problems Africa is facing are multiple and overlapping. The Figure shows that 8 of the 54 African countries (Botswana, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Lesotho, Libya, Namibia, South Africa and Swaziland) are facing serious public health issues on 3 key dimensions stunting, women’s anemia and overweight/obesity—a triple burden. Thirteen countries are facing a double burden of undernutrition and overweight/obesity. Only four countries are facing serious single burdens of stunting (Ethiopia and Rwanda) and women’s anemia (Ghana and Senegal).
The burdens in terms of human suffering, mortality and disease are large (IFPRI 2015), but so too are the economic burdens. The African Union and the World Food Programme Cost of Hunger estimates are summarized in this Figure.
To assess whether a country will attain the Malabo stunting target by 2025 we calculate the average annual rate of reduction (AARR) required for a country to get to 10% stunting from where it currently stands. We then compare the required AARR to the country’s recent performance in reducing rates (the current AARR as determined by the Joint Child Malnutrition Estimates from UNICEF/WHO/WB: JME 2015). If the current AARR ≥ the required AARR then the country is “on course”. If the current AARR is > 0 but < the required AARR then the country if designated as “off course but making progress” and if the current AARR is ≤0 (i.e. stunting rates are static or increasing) then the country is designated as “off course, no progress”.
The table lists the countries by their latest stunting estimate and the colours designate if they are on or off course. 49 countries have sufficient data to make the comparison while 5 do not. Of the 49 with data, only 4 are on course to meet the Malabo declaration target, 39 are off course but making some progress and only 6 are making no progress.
The table undertakes the same exercise, but instead the aim is to meet the more modest WHA target of a 40% reduction in the number of stunted children by 2025 applied to each country. The results show that 9 countries are on course, the same 6 are making no progress and that 34 are off course but making some progress.
Finally for exclusive breastfeeding (infants <6 months), so important for getting infants off to the best possible start in life, Table 5 shows that 23 countries are on course, 3 are off course but making some progress, while 12 are off course making no progress (and one of these 12, Egypt, is actually showing a worsening rate of exclusive breastfeeding rates). 16 countries do not have sufficient data to make an assessment.
The table summarises the country rankings and progress status for wasting. Here the WHA 2025 target is to be less than 5%. As the Table shows of 51 countries with data, 17 are on course and 34 are off course.
The table summarises the rankings and progress for anaemia in women of reproductive age (15-49 years). Only one country, Burundi, is on track to meet this WHA target.
And political leadership is vital for progress in nutrition
In the past 3 GNRs we have highlighted several countries experiences on moving nutrition indicators. They are listed.
Many factors are responsible and we have listed 4 sets.
Central to these is political commitment.
Remember: Ghana & Maharashtra halved their stunting rates 12 years. When forces are aligned properly rapid change can happen.
SUGGEST YOU DO NOT REMOVE THIS SLIDE
While the problem of food and nutrition security in Africa, and indeed the world, is one that may appear daunting, it is true that a problem can only be addressed when it is first recognized as a problem. In this regard, African countries have already recognized that food and nutrition security must be addressed and certain commitments have been made. Recognising the extent and consequences of the burdens, African leaders made this bold commitment within the Malabo Declaration of 2014: "To improve nutritional status, and in particular, the elimination of child under-nutrition in Africa with a view to bringing down stunting to 10% and underweight to 5% by 2025." In addition, African leaders have signed up to the World Health Assembly Targets to reach key targets for 6 nutrition outcomes by 2025. This is the Malabo Declaration on ”Nutrition Security for Inclusive Economic Growth and Sustainable Development”.
The Decade of Action is for everybody. What will each African country, professional Nutrition Association like the African Nutrition Society do to ensure that within 10 years we change positively the face of malnutrition in Africa? Initiative for Food and Nutrition Security in Africa (IFNA), which was launched at TICAD VI in Nairobi this August by the Government of Japan. IFNA aims to work with African Governments to accelerate the implementation of their food and nutrition security policies.