An attempt to distill some rules of thumb for museum interpretation, covering the spectrum from analog to digital. Delivered to an international audience of museum professionals in Yerevan, Armenia on October 21, 2012.
Drawing from the Well of Language: Droughts, Floods, and Flows of Meaning
1. Drawing from the Well of Language
Droughts, floods, and flows of meaning
Peter Samis
Associate Curator, Interpretive Media
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art
MUSEUMS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION. Tradition and Innovation
ICOM-CECA 2012 Yerevan, Armenia 21 October 2012
2. Museums.
Even if they look like this on the outside...
7. Modern art—like all the objects we exhibit
—exists in a framework of meanings.
• Physical aspects
• Process of its making
• Relationships (to its maker, to ideas, to
other works)
• Documents (journals, letters, sketches)
• Media
• Methods of approach and understanding
8. Of these, art museums typically strip away
all but one or two.
• Method(s) of approach and understanding
• Physical aspects
9. Experts………………Novices
Somewhere along the line
that leaves us to restore the
context.
13. “The very basic belief that is behind my
work is that objecthood, or objects as
such, doesn‟t have a place in the world
if there‟s not an individual person
making some use of that object…”
14. So what‟s our toolkit for hooking visitors
on the objects we share?
urbanmkr, ...in our borrowed tackle box
15. ONLY CONNECT: A research project on
visitor-centered museum interpretation
with Mimi Michaelson, Ph.D.
sponsored by the
Samuel H. Kress
Foundation
16. So, some lessons on a continuum from Analog to Digital:
1. Gallery texts and object labels.
20. “Much of the art in this suite was
made before the French
Revolution for European
aristocrats who lived grandly,
luxuriously, and fashionably.
“The works of art help reveal how
the privileged few wiled away their
days and how they perceived
others in the world.”
In two sentences, the entrance panel
sets you up for a highly charged
experience.
25. Minimum words. Maximum impact.
BELLAMY: “With visitor research, most people… read
the first couple sentences and then you move on. So
we thought, „Okay, we‟ll just give them the first
couple sentences. We‟ll put everything that we need
to in those first couple sentences.‟”
PERRY: Our word count on labels is thirty
words. And within that thirty words, you
have to say why that object is good.
—Interview with Martin Bellamy and Anne Perry of the Glasgow Museums
26. Consider the longer wall text…
rewritten with
personality!
Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam
31. It‟s just as easy to run on at the mouth
and try to cram too many points in,
ignoring people‟s tired feet.
Photo: FreakingNews.com
32. So what can you say in a minute that
keeps people looking at—and engaged
with—the object?
[Micro-doses of
content.
Touch the screen
to access each
one.]
Add great video as a sub-level, but keep it short!
33. One museum director told us:
“I don‟t like the idea of everything gravitating toward
a predictable, or best-practices model… You know, it‟s
sort of a phantom idea, and it could spell mediocrity.
And so I think, you know, there‟s the best practice for
the project…
But I‟m always interested in seeing what people think
„best practices‟ means, and I‟m always ready for a
debate on that, with anybody who cares to talk about
it.”
—Dan Spock, Director, Minnesota History Center
35. The same applies to video and multimedia,
on-site and online.
[Touch each thumbnail to reveal a paragraph of content, a facet of the topic.]
36. Knowledge on demand, just in time.
Points of Departure: Connecting with Contemporary Art, SFMOMA, 2001
37. Updated.
Art Institute of Chicago, Decorative Arts galleries, 2012
38. Words, effectively written and dosed, can
turn seemingly neutral objects into
passionate subjects.
[How many ways are there to make a black painting—and
what are some of the reasons one might want to do so?]
39. Unfamilar objects need stories—and
people who are passionately involved.
[Segments from Dorothea Lange‟s oral history.]
40. The spoken word is powerful medicine.
Especially combined with images & text.
http://www.sfmoma.org/explore/multimedia/interactive_features/68
Much of the art in this suite was made before the French Revolution for European aristocrats who lived grandly, luxuriously, and fashionably. The works of art help reveal how the privileged few wiled away their days and how they perceived others in the world
“Impressionism’s breath of fresh air is just a memory here. Munch, Kokoschka and Beckmann put people center stage and exaggerate to make themselves heard. Who cares about likeness? They despise the bourgeois who believes that all is for the best in the best of all possible worlds… Their art isn’t easy, and doesn’t set out to be. They see themselves as Van Gogh’s heirs, but of his tormented, overstrung side. Their art can hurt, can be ugly.”
Impressionism’s breath of fresh air is just a memory here. Munch, Kokoschka and Beckmann put people center stage and exaggerate to make themselves heard. Who cares about likeness? They despise the bourgeois who believes that all is for the best in the best of all possible worlds… Their art isn’t easy, and doesn’t set out to be. They see themselves as Van Gogh’s heirs, but of his tormented, overstrung side. Their art can hurt, can be ugly.
Once accepted, they can deal with the paintings. Address them full on, in their potency.