SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 31
LEGAL THINKING

 Miriam A. Smith
 Broadcast and Electronic
 Communication Arts Department
 San Francisco State University




  Spring 2013
The Nature of Legal Thinking

  What         is legal thinking?

  How  is legal thinking different from
  other types of thinking?

  How          is legal thinking learned?

  Spring 2013
What is Legal Thinking?

  The       way lawyers think
    – Lawyers carefully analyze the facts
  How   are the facts at hand the
   same or different from the facts
   of a particular case?
  An analytical model



   Spring 2013
How do Lawyers Think?

  Lawyers         ask many questions.
   – Is this a good case?
   – Can it be proven in court?
   – Is it likely to achieve the result the
     client desires?
   – Can the client pay?
            Is a judgment collectible?


  Spring 2013
How are the facts at hand the
same or different from the facts of
a particular case?

         Think it through.
         Consider all the angles.
         Anticipate all arguments.
  Spring 2013
How is Legal Thinking different?


 You tell me.




   Spring 2013
How is Legal Thinking Learned?
How is Legal Thinking Learned?


  Law  school or by studying legal
   decisions.
  Three most important things I
   learned in law school . . .
    – Reasonable minds can differ.
    – There are at least two sides to every
      story.
    – Pigs get fat and hogs get slaughtered.

   Spring 2013
What about all that legal mumbo jumbo?


 a.k.a. the fine print




   Spring 2013
legalese

  All   professions have their jargon
    – Terms of art
    – distinguish those in the profession
  We   will learn many legal terms
   this semester



   Spring 2013
We’ll try some legalese . . .

    I, being of sound and disposing mind and memory,
     not acting under duress, menace, fraud, or the
     undue influence of any person or persons
     whatsoever, do hereby make, publish, and declare
     this to be my last will and testament, hereby revoking
     all wills and heretofore made by me, and give devise
     and bequeath the residue of my estate and all my
     earthly possessions consisting in whole of my three
     bags full of wool in the following manner:
       – a. One for the The Master
       – b. One for the Dame
       – c. One for the little boy who lives down the lane
    Signed on the 11th day of June, 2002.
Last Will and Testament
One more

  Sentence
    Peter (alias Peter), known for his peculiar propensity
     for the consumption of a variety of squash known
     colloquially as pumpkin, was in possession of a
     spouse who was a compulsive fugitive.
    He imprisoned her within the confines of a shell from
     a fruit of Curcurbita pepo,
    where she is now serving time under maximum
     security.




     Spring 2013
Our Legal Thinking Model

  Facts
  Issue
  Rule of Law
  Analysis
  Conclusion




  Spring 2013
Just the Facts Ma’am . . .

 A   different set of facts will yield a
   different result.
  One fact alone can make all the
   difference.
  Some facts are more important
   than others.


   Fall 2010
Issue

  What must the court decide?
  What question or questions must
   be answered?




  Spring 2013
The Rule of Law

  Isthere a rule (i.e., law) that
   applies?
  What is that rule (law)?




   Spring 2013
Analysis

 A clear, logical explanation of
  the reasoning of the court.
   – Explains the rule of law.
   – Considers the arguments of the
     parties.
  Why did the court decide the
  way it did?

  Spring 2013
How judges think . . .

  How has the rule of law been
  applied before?
   – Precedent


  How should it be applied in this
  instance?
   – What is the same as and what is
     different from earlier cases?
  Spring 2013
– What is the rationale for the rule?


 What are the primary defenses
 to the rule?
  – Do they apply?




 Spring 2013
No precedent

 A   case of first impression . . .
   – Situation sense
   – Fairness between these parties
   – Public Policy




  Spring 2013
Conclusion

  Summary      of what happened.

  Decisions we read are almost
   always appellate decisions.
  Lower court’s decision is upheld,
   reversed or remanded.


  Spring 2013
Preliminary Facts

  Supreme
  1893
  Nix-- merchant
  Hedden -- tax collector




  Spring 2013
Facts

  Tax   collector
   charged tax on
   tomatoes
  Charged
   “vegetable” tax
  Plaintiff claims
   tomatoes are a
   fruit, not a
   vegetable

   Spring 2013
Issue

                 Are     tomatoes a
                  fruit




                 or   a vegetable?



  Spring 2013
Rule of Law

  Tariff        Act




   Spring 2013
Analysis

  Considered    the meaning of “fruit”
   and “vegetable” in the trade (and
   in the dictionaries)
  Consumer use of tomatoes
    – Used as a vegetable
    – Not really a dessert
  Tomatoes      are a “fruit of the vine”

   Spring 2013
Conclusion

  Tomatoes     are a vegetable
  Judgment of lower court affirmed
  (plaintiff loses)




  Spring 2013

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Legal Thinking 2013

Lay magistrates powerpoint
Lay magistrates powerpoint Lay magistrates powerpoint
Lay magistrates powerpoint AroosaShabir
 
Mechanics2013 14
Mechanics2013 14Mechanics2013 14
Mechanics2013 14Miss Hart
 
50 civil and criminal cases
50 civil and criminal cases50 civil and criminal cases
50 civil and criminal casesKevin A
 
Synthesis legal readers
Synthesis legal readersSynthesis legal readers
Synthesis legal readerskdouat
 
Redlines_in_English_Legal_Terminology_A (2).pdf
Redlines_in_English_Legal_Terminology_A (2).pdfRedlines_in_English_Legal_Terminology_A (2).pdf
Redlines_in_English_Legal_Terminology_A (2).pdfsamisaleem9
 
LAW037 Notes - EXCEPT COURTS W/ SPECIAL JURISDICTION
LAW037 Notes - EXCEPT COURTS W/ SPECIAL JURISDICTIONLAW037 Notes - EXCEPT COURTS W/ SPECIAL JURISDICTION
LAW037 Notes - EXCEPT COURTS W/ SPECIAL JURISDICTIONDania
 
Intddddddddd-to-Criminal-Law-Slides.pptx
Intddddddddd-to-Criminal-Law-Slides.pptxIntddddddddd-to-Criminal-Law-Slides.pptx
Intddddddddd-to-Criminal-Law-Slides.pptxAshadulHoqueJahin1
 
Stat Int - What is Parliament's intention?
Stat Int - What is Parliament's intention?Stat Int - What is Parliament's intention?
Stat Int - What is Parliament's intention?shummi
 
1 UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH BUSINESS SCHOOL BUS.docx
1 UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH BUSINESS SCHOOL BUS.docx1 UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH BUSINESS SCHOOL BUS.docx
1 UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH BUSINESS SCHOOL BUS.docxhoney725342
 
Types and classifications of law
Types and classifications of lawTypes and classifications of law
Types and classifications of lawDeepak Alloid
 
CJUS 500Presentation Courts (Part 1) TranscriptSlide 1.docx
CJUS 500Presentation Courts (Part 1) TranscriptSlide 1.docxCJUS 500Presentation Courts (Part 1) TranscriptSlide 1.docx
CJUS 500Presentation Courts (Part 1) TranscriptSlide 1.docxsleeperharwell
 

Ähnlich wie Legal Thinking 2013 (14)

Libr 430 Week 8
Libr 430 Week 8Libr 430 Week 8
Libr 430 Week 8
 
Libr 430 Week 8
Libr 430 Week 8Libr 430 Week 8
Libr 430 Week 8
 
Lay magistrates powerpoint
Lay magistrates powerpoint Lay magistrates powerpoint
Lay magistrates powerpoint
 
Mechanics2013 14
Mechanics2013 14Mechanics2013 14
Mechanics2013 14
 
50 civil and criminal cases
50 civil and criminal cases50 civil and criminal cases
50 civil and criminal cases
 
ADMJ2 - Intro to ADMJ - Chapter 3
ADMJ2 - Intro to ADMJ - Chapter 3ADMJ2 - Intro to ADMJ - Chapter 3
ADMJ2 - Intro to ADMJ - Chapter 3
 
Synthesis legal readers
Synthesis legal readersSynthesis legal readers
Synthesis legal readers
 
Redlines_in_English_Legal_Terminology_A (2).pdf
Redlines_in_English_Legal_Terminology_A (2).pdfRedlines_in_English_Legal_Terminology_A (2).pdf
Redlines_in_English_Legal_Terminology_A (2).pdf
 
LAW037 Notes - EXCEPT COURTS W/ SPECIAL JURISDICTION
LAW037 Notes - EXCEPT COURTS W/ SPECIAL JURISDICTIONLAW037 Notes - EXCEPT COURTS W/ SPECIAL JURISDICTION
LAW037 Notes - EXCEPT COURTS W/ SPECIAL JURISDICTION
 
Intddddddddd-to-Criminal-Law-Slides.pptx
Intddddddddd-to-Criminal-Law-Slides.pptxIntddddddddd-to-Criminal-Law-Slides.pptx
Intddddddddd-to-Criminal-Law-Slides.pptx
 
Stat Int - What is Parliament's intention?
Stat Int - What is Parliament's intention?Stat Int - What is Parliament's intention?
Stat Int - What is Parliament's intention?
 
1 UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH BUSINESS SCHOOL BUS.docx
1 UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH BUSINESS SCHOOL BUS.docx1 UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH BUSINESS SCHOOL BUS.docx
1 UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH BUSINESS SCHOOL BUS.docx
 
Types and classifications of law
Types and classifications of lawTypes and classifications of law
Types and classifications of law
 
CJUS 500Presentation Courts (Part 1) TranscriptSlide 1.docx
CJUS 500Presentation Courts (Part 1) TranscriptSlide 1.docxCJUS 500Presentation Courts (Part 1) TranscriptSlide 1.docx
CJUS 500Presentation Courts (Part 1) TranscriptSlide 1.docx
 

Mehr von Miriam Smith

Media Today - Spring 2016
Media Today - Spring 2016Media Today - Spring 2016
Media Today - Spring 2016Miriam Smith
 
Our Electronic Media Timeline
Our Electronic Media TimelineOur Electronic Media Timeline
Our Electronic Media TimelineMiriam Smith
 
First amendment 2013
First amendment 2013First amendment 2013
First amendment 2013Miriam Smith
 
Media Economics & Communication Policy Fall 2011
Media Economics & Communication Policy Fall 2011Media Economics & Communication Policy Fall 2011
Media Economics & Communication Policy Fall 2011Miriam Smith
 
Financial Report Literacy Fall 2011
Financial Report Literacy Fall 2011Financial Report Literacy Fall 2011
Financial Report Literacy Fall 2011Miriam Smith
 
Rights clearances 2011
Rights clearances 2011Rights clearances 2011
Rights clearances 2011Miriam Smith
 
Policy & Economics (Law)
Policy & Economics (Law)Policy & Economics (Law)
Policy & Economics (Law)Miriam Smith
 
Music Recording Industry
Music Recording IndustryMusic Recording Industry
Music Recording IndustryMiriam Smith
 
Audience and Audience Measurement (Ratings)
Audience and Audience Measurement (Ratings)Audience and Audience Measurement (Ratings)
Audience and Audience Measurement (Ratings)Miriam Smith
 
Financial Reports and Ratios
Financial Reports and RatiosFinancial Reports and Ratios
Financial Reports and RatiosMiriam Smith
 
Content (Programming)
Content (Programming)Content (Programming)
Content (Programming)Miriam Smith
 
Obscenity and Indecency
Obscenity and IndecencyObscenity and Indecency
Obscenity and IndecencyMiriam Smith
 

Mehr von Miriam Smith (20)

Media Today - Spring 2016
Media Today - Spring 2016Media Today - Spring 2016
Media Today - Spring 2016
 
Advertising 2015
Advertising 2015Advertising 2015
Advertising 2015
 
Our Electronic Media Timeline
Our Electronic Media TimelineOur Electronic Media Timeline
Our Electronic Media Timeline
 
Media Adoption
Media AdoptionMedia Adoption
Media Adoption
 
Our media world
Our media worldOur media world
Our media world
 
Legal System 2013
Legal System 2013Legal System 2013
Legal System 2013
 
First amendment 2013
First amendment 2013First amendment 2013
First amendment 2013
 
Media Economics & Communication Policy Fall 2011
Media Economics & Communication Policy Fall 2011Media Economics & Communication Policy Fall 2011
Media Economics & Communication Policy Fall 2011
 
Financial Report Literacy Fall 2011
Financial Report Literacy Fall 2011Financial Report Literacy Fall 2011
Financial Report Literacy Fall 2011
 
Rights clearances 2011
Rights clearances 2011Rights clearances 2011
Rights clearances 2011
 
Television
TelevisionTelevision
Television
 
Policy & Economics (Law)
Policy & Economics (Law)Policy & Economics (Law)
Policy & Economics (Law)
 
Radio industry
Radio industryRadio industry
Radio industry
 
Music Recording Industry
Music Recording IndustryMusic Recording Industry
Music Recording Industry
 
Audience and Audience Measurement (Ratings)
Audience and Audience Measurement (Ratings)Audience and Audience Measurement (Ratings)
Audience and Audience Measurement (Ratings)
 
Financial Reports and Ratios
Financial Reports and RatiosFinancial Reports and Ratios
Financial Reports and Ratios
 
Content (Programming)
Content (Programming)Content (Programming)
Content (Programming)
 
Economics
EconomicsEconomics
Economics
 
Trademark Law
Trademark LawTrademark Law
Trademark Law
 
Obscenity and Indecency
Obscenity and IndecencyObscenity and Indecency
Obscenity and Indecency
 

Legal Thinking 2013

  • 1. LEGAL THINKING Miriam A. Smith Broadcast and Electronic Communication Arts Department San Francisco State University Spring 2013
  • 2. The Nature of Legal Thinking  What is legal thinking?  How is legal thinking different from other types of thinking?  How is legal thinking learned? Spring 2013
  • 3. What is Legal Thinking?  The way lawyers think – Lawyers carefully analyze the facts  How are the facts at hand the same or different from the facts of a particular case?  An analytical model Spring 2013
  • 4. How do Lawyers Think?  Lawyers ask many questions. – Is this a good case? – Can it be proven in court? – Is it likely to achieve the result the client desires? – Can the client pay?  Is a judgment collectible? Spring 2013
  • 5. How are the facts at hand the same or different from the facts of a particular case? Think it through. Consider all the angles. Anticipate all arguments. Spring 2013
  • 6. How is Legal Thinking different? You tell me. Spring 2013
  • 7. How is Legal Thinking Learned?
  • 8. How is Legal Thinking Learned?  Law school or by studying legal decisions.  Three most important things I learned in law school . . . – Reasonable minds can differ. – There are at least two sides to every story. – Pigs get fat and hogs get slaughtered. Spring 2013
  • 9. What about all that legal mumbo jumbo? a.k.a. the fine print Spring 2013
  • 10. legalese  All professions have their jargon – Terms of art – distinguish those in the profession  We will learn many legal terms this semester Spring 2013
  • 11. We’ll try some legalese . . .  I, being of sound and disposing mind and memory, not acting under duress, menace, fraud, or the undue influence of any person or persons whatsoever, do hereby make, publish, and declare this to be my last will and testament, hereby revoking all wills and heretofore made by me, and give devise and bequeath the residue of my estate and all my earthly possessions consisting in whole of my three bags full of wool in the following manner: – a. One for the The Master – b. One for the Dame – c. One for the little boy who lives down the lane  Signed on the 11th day of June, 2002.
  • 12. Last Will and Testament
  • 13.
  • 14. One more  Sentence  Peter (alias Peter), known for his peculiar propensity for the consumption of a variety of squash known colloquially as pumpkin, was in possession of a spouse who was a compulsive fugitive.  He imprisoned her within the confines of a shell from a fruit of Curcurbita pepo,  where she is now serving time under maximum security. Spring 2013
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17. Our Legal Thinking Model  Facts  Issue  Rule of Law  Analysis  Conclusion Spring 2013
  • 18. Just the Facts Ma’am . . . A different set of facts will yield a different result.  One fact alone can make all the difference.  Some facts are more important than others. Fall 2010
  • 19. Issue  What must the court decide?  What question or questions must be answered? Spring 2013
  • 20. The Rule of Law  Isthere a rule (i.e., law) that applies?  What is that rule (law)? Spring 2013
  • 21. Analysis A clear, logical explanation of the reasoning of the court. – Explains the rule of law. – Considers the arguments of the parties.  Why did the court decide the way it did? Spring 2013
  • 22. How judges think . . .  How has the rule of law been applied before? – Precedent  How should it be applied in this instance? – What is the same as and what is different from earlier cases? Spring 2013
  • 23. – What is the rationale for the rule?  What are the primary defenses to the rule? – Do they apply? Spring 2013
  • 24. No precedent A case of first impression . . . – Situation sense – Fairness between these parties – Public Policy Spring 2013
  • 25. Conclusion  Summary of what happened.  Decisions we read are almost always appellate decisions.  Lower court’s decision is upheld, reversed or remanded. Spring 2013
  • 26. Preliminary Facts  Supreme  1893  Nix-- merchant  Hedden -- tax collector Spring 2013
  • 27. Facts  Tax collector charged tax on tomatoes  Charged “vegetable” tax  Plaintiff claims tomatoes are a fruit, not a vegetable Spring 2013
  • 28. Issue  Are tomatoes a fruit  or a vegetable? Spring 2013
  • 29. Rule of Law  Tariff Act Spring 2013
  • 30. Analysis  Considered the meaning of “fruit” and “vegetable” in the trade (and in the dictionaries)  Consumer use of tomatoes – Used as a vegetable – Not really a dessert  Tomatoes are a “fruit of the vine” Spring 2013
  • 31. Conclusion  Tomatoes are a vegetable  Judgment of lower court affirmed  (plaintiff loses) Spring 2013

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. Dorothy M Wheeler illustration (Wikimedia)