EIA Report

A Project Report
On
Preparation of Application for Environmental
Clearance of Construction Project
In Partial Fulfillment for The Award of The Degree
OF
MASTER IN ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING
BY
PRIYANKA SINGH
(ENROLLMENT NO: A11227912005 )
Under the guidance of
Dr. Ashutosh Tripathi
Neha Gupta
AMITY INSITUTUE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
AMITY UNIVERSITY, NOIDA (UTTAR PRADESH)
JUNE-2014

A Project Report
On
Preparation of Application for Environmental
Clearance of Construction Project
For the partial fulfillment for the award of the degree
OF
MASTER OF TECHNOLOGY
IN
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
AMITY INSITUTUE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
AMITY UNIVERSITY, NOIDA (UTTAR PRADESH)
JUNE-2014
Under the Supervision of: Submitted By:
DR. ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI PRIYANKA SINGH
Amity University, Noida Enrl No: A11227912005
MS. NEHA GUPTA
Vardan EnviroNet, Gurgaon

Declaration
I hereby declare that the work embodied in this report entitled “Preparation of Application
for Environmental Clearance of Construction Project” in partial fulfilment for the award
of Degree of “Master of Technology” in Environmental Engineering from Amity Institute
of Environmental Sciences, Amity University, Noida has been done by me from Vardan
EnviroNet, Gurgaon under the supervision of Ms. Neha Gupta during 10th December 2013 to 9th
May 2014. The work done by me during the dissertation is original and has not been submitted
by anyone in the university.
I also hereby declare that the work done by me during the dissertation is original and the content
embodied in this report has not been published anywhere for the award of any other Degree.
Priyanka Singh
Date: Enrollment No. A11227912005

Faculty Guide Approval
This is to certified that the work embodied in this dissertation entitled “Preparation of
Application for Environmental Clearance of Construction Project” has been submitted
by Priyanka Singh for the award of the Master of Technology in Environmental Engineering
is a record of industrial work carried out by her under my supervision at Amity Institute of
Environmental Sciences, Amity University, Noida. She has completed her dissertation from
Vardan EnviroNet, Gurgaon under the sub-guidance of Ms. Neha Gupta during 10th December
2013 to 9th May 2014 on the above mentioned project.
The work is original and has not been submitted so far for award of any other degree, diploma or
other title in this university or any other university or any institute at higher learning.
Dr. Ashutosh Tripathi
Supervisor
AIES, Amity University
Noida

Acknowledgement
While doing this project, number of people contributed at various steps. They helped me
during my dissertation and they deserve special thanks. It’s a pleasure to convey my gratitude
to them.
First and Foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my project guide Dr.
Ashutosh Tripathi for giving me the opportunity to do the work on this topic. It
would never be possible for me to take this project on this level without his innovative
ideas and his relentless support, suggestion and encouragement from an initial stage of this
project.
I am extremely grateful to Mr. R. S. Yadav, Managing Director at Vardan EnviroNet for
giving me the permission to carry out my dissertation work at his organization.
I am highly thankful to Ms. Neha Gupta (Environmental Officer), Vardan EnviroNet,
Gurgaon or providing necessary guidance and suggestion for completion of this work.
Without her support and co-operation, I was not able to complete my project.
I also extend my deep sense of gratitude to entire team of Vardan EnviroNet who has
supported me all time during my dissertation at Vardan EnviroNet.
And I am especially thankful to Priyanka Raheja, Student of Delhi University and Muzahid
Khan-Associate Manager of Hitech Enviro Engineer & Consultant Pvt. Ltd. whose
educational and professional experience support was a great factor in the development of this
report.
At last but not least, I am very thankful to my parents whose moral support was always with
me during my dissertation.
Priyanka Singh

Contents
Chapter No. Titles Page No.
1 Introduction
1.1. Introduction of Environmental Clearance 2
1.2. Process of Environmental Clearance 2 - 6
1.3. TOR ( Term of References) 7
1.4. Validity of EC 7
2 Review of Literature 9-10
3
Preparation of Application for Environmental Clearance
3.1. About the case 12
3.2. Proposed project location and neighborhood 12
3.3. Project outline with environmental project 16-19
3.4. Total density of local population 20
3.5. Estimated budget of proposed project 20
3.6. Quantity of daily demand for water 21-23
3.7. Sewage Treatment Technology 23- 31
3.8. Rain Water Harvesting 31- 34
3.9. Space for parking 35-39
3.10. Demand of electricity 40
3.11. Solid Waste Generation 40- 44
3.12. Green Area 44- 48
3.13. Detail of Construction Materials 49

3.14. Materials Used for Construction & Their U Values 49-50
4. Analysis and Data Collection
4.1. Environment Management Plan 52
4.2. EMP Includes Four Major Elements 52- 54
4.3. Potential Impacts and Remedial Measures of
55- 73
Environmental Components
4.4. Significance of the project 74
5 References

List of Tables
S.No. Name of the table Page No.
1 Threshold limits of project 2-3
2 Area Statement 16-17
3 Population Break up 20
4 Calculations for Daily Water Demand 21
5 Technical Specifications for Sewage Treatment
Plant
27-31
6 Rainwater Harvesting Calculation 32
7 Calculation of Solid Waste Generation 41
8 Green Area Calculation 44
9 Result of Ground Water Quality Monitoring 57
10 Air Quality adjacent to D Tower at the Project
Site
61
11 Results of PM2.5 adjacent to D Tower of the
project site
62
12 Results of PM10 adjacent to D Tower of the
project site
63
13 Results of SO2 adjacent to D Tower of the project
site
64
14 Results of NO2 adjacent to D Tower of the project
site
65
15 Noise Level Monitoring 68
16 Results of Soil Analysis 71-72

List of Figures
S.No. Nam of Figures Page No.
1 Process of Environmental Clearance (EC) 4
2 500 m radius Google map showing the project site 13
3 Water Balance Diagram 23
4 Schematic design of STP of MBBR Technology 25
5 Typical Rain Water Harvesting Pit Design 33
6 Solid Waste Management Scheme during
Construction Phase
41
7 Solid Waste Management Scheme during Operation
Phase
43
8 Concentration of PM2.5 at the Monitoring Location 62
9 Concentration of PM10 at the Monitoring Location 63
10 Concentration of SO2 at the Monitoring Location 64
11 Concentration of NO2 at the Monitoring Location 65
12 Noise monitoring data 69

GLOSSARY OF TERMS
EC Environmental Clearance
FAR Floor Area Ratio
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
CRZ Coastal Regulation Zone
HUDA Haryana Urban Development Authority
MSW Municipal Solid Waste
STP Sewage Treatment Plant
KLD Kilolitres per Day
NH National Highway
ECS Equivalent Car Space
DHBVN Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam
KVA Kilo Volt Ampere
MSIHC Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemical
SE South-East
NW North-West
W West
HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning
MBBR Moving Bed Bioreactor
CGWA Central Ground Water Authority
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards

CPCB Central Pollution Control Board
NAB National Building Code
ECBC Energy Conservation Building Code
ISO International Organization for Standardization
M/s Masers
EWS Economically Weaker Section
T.S.S Total Suspended Solids
T.D.S Total Dissolved Solids
BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand
COD Chemical Oxygen Demand
pH Potential Hydrogen
PVC Poly Vinyl Chloride
ACF Activated Carbon Filter
M.O.C Material of Construction
R.C.C. Reinforced Cement Concrete
DU Dwelling Unit
EMS Environmental Management System
EMP Environmental Management Plan

Abstract
Construction activities are pursued in India without focusing on environmental issues. Due to
this natural resources are in pressure and also creating harmful effects on human health and well
beings and this environmental pressure is due to unplanned and unsustainable infrastructure
development. Hence, the Government of India accomplish the Environmental Protection Act in
23 May 1986 to plan the activity in sustainable way by considering the water and air
environment. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process was made mandatory on 27th
January 1994 for projects of various categories like mining of minerals highway projects,
thermal power projects, oil and refinery projects etc except construction projects. MoEF, the
ministry of Environment & Forest had issued revised notification on Environmental Clearance
(EC) processes on 14th September 2006 vide which environmental clearance was made
mandatory for construction projects. There are certain criteria to prepare and file an application.
A report in the form of Form-I, Form- IA, Conceptual Plan and other necessary approvals has to
be submitted to SEAC/SEIAA to proceed the process of EC. Central government made a
committee named State Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) and authority named State Level
Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), has power to grant EC after ensuring that
there is no environmental issue arises with this construction activity and also all the guidelines as
per EIA notifications, norms and standards made by MoEF, NBC, ECBC etc will be followed by
the proposed project.
Keywords: Environmental Clearance, Environmental Impact Assessment, Environmental
Management Plan

Objective
The main objective of this project is to serve the state of art facility to live in Gurgaon
and maximize local employment and educational opportunities.

Chapter 1
1. Introduction
1.1 INTRODUCTION TO ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE
In India, the core sectors like thermal power plants, mining, highway, distilleries, textile
industries and construction activities etc has a significant role to play for the progress of the
country by providing with the elementary requirements of its people. Most of the times these
practices are carried out without taking into account the environmental concerns, resulting in an
unplanned urban development at the cost of sustainability and there by posing a far greater threat
to our biodiversity and increased environmental pressures. On January 27th 1994, the Ministry of
Environment & Forests has passed a direction in order to provide for a better environment with
the projected activity vide which a project proponent has to submit a brief report called
EIA/EMP report to the SEIAA/MoEF before the commencement of the project. This report
consist a detailed description of all the impacts of the projected activity on the environment and
its measures to mitigate them. This method is coined as EIA process/EC clearance.
1.2. PROCESS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE/EIA
The major objective of the EIA Notification, 2006 is to frame out the guidelines and procedures
for EC. With respect to these guidelines, an applicant needs to submit the application in
conjunction with Form I, Form I A & Conceptual Plan and a few other necessary approvals. All
construction and area development projects include a minimum threshold limit which is given in
the following Table-1.
Table 1: Threshold limits of project
S. No. Sector Category Amendment in
EIA notification
A B 2006
8(a) Building and
construction
projects
---- Less than 20,000 sqm.
to greater than 1,50,000
sqm. of built-up area
No EIA

8(b) Area development
projects
---- Greater than 1,50,000
sqm. of built-up area
EIA Required
[Construction Manual issued by MoEF under EIA Notification 2006]*
All these projects are classified broadly in to two major categories:-
 Category A
 Category B
Foregoing application for Environmental Clearance shall be recommended by Form I, Form I A,
and Conceptual plan as given in the Appendix, after spotting the project site, the additional copy
of Form I A and Conceptual plan setup together with the annexure.
There are 2 following stages within the previous EC process for brand new projects:
 Screening
 Scoping
 Appraisal
Screening: This is the preliminary stage of the entire EIA Process. In this initial stage the
category of the project is identified which enables to make the decision whether the project or the
activity requires EIA or not for advanced environmental studies. Prior environmental clearance
depends on the project’s nature and location. The regulatory authority may reject prior EC
applications by which SEAC is concerned at this stage itself. In the event of an application being
rejected, a written communication of the decision with its reasons of rejection shall be
communicated to the applicant within sixty working days as the receipt of the application.
Scoping: This is the second part of EIA process which lays out the Terms of Reference as
granted by SEAC entirely on the basis of the initial application submitted by PP. Terms of
Reference encompasses all the mandatory points necessary for the EIA study. After
incorporating all the points of ToR the final EIA report is prepared by and submitted to the
SEIAA.
Appraisal: This is the last and final stage of EIA process in which the project report has to
presented before SEIAA by the project proponent (PP) and consultant to grant the EC which is
already recommended by SEAC and equally SEAC is also obliged in time bound to appraise the

case within the 60 days from the date of application submission. SEIAA may appraise it if
ensured that no adverse impact is anticipated from the proposed project or if proper measures of
mitigation or management plan will be proposed by the project proponent.
** SEIAA appraises/grants the EC with a specific condition that PP has to summit the
compliance report of condition mention in EC letter on a half yearly basis.
There is a list proposed for Building & Construction projects in Environmental Clearance
application. There are following documents required for EC:
Mandatory requirements (as per EIA Notification, 2006 amended to date)
S.No. Documents
Remarks
1.
Form -1
(as per prescribed
format)
 Project name should clearly indicate whether it is a
new project or an expansion.
 Basic information should be filled properly along
with the Name of the proponent, Contact address,
Contact number, email id, Fax no., etc.
 The undertaking should be signed by the proponent
with clear mention of date and place.
 In case of Authorized signatory, the authorization
letter from the proponent should be attached.
2.
Form 1A
(as per prescribed
format)
Data/information as sought in the Form 1A should also
clearly contain following:
 Area statement/details including permissible &
proposed Ground Coverage & FAR, Built-up area,
plot area, basement area etc.
 Site photographs showing present status.
 Details of water consumption, power requirement,
power back-up, connectivity, community facilities
and parking needs.
 Baseline environmental data w.r.t Ambient Air &
Water quality and Noise levels from NABL
accredited Laboratory with scope of work.
 Water Balance Diagram / chart and details of STP.
 Details of Solid Waste, Hazardous Waste, etc. as
applicable.
 Green area details along with list of trees.
 Building height & stack height.
 Energy Conservation measures and estimated energy
savings.

 Fire Fighting & Disaster Management Plan
 Environment Management Plan (EMP) with separate
budget for construction and operation phase.
 Action plan for Corporate Social Responsibility with
budget (one time as well as recurring cost / year).
 Details of RWH with schematic diagrams, as
applicable
 Details of RWH with schematic diagram, as
applicable and location of pits on layout plan
 Geo-technical Investigation Report signed by
conducting agency and project proponent, etc.
3. Conceptual Plan It should include basic description of the project,
existing/proposed land use details, site location,
surrounding features of the proposed site (within core
and buffer zones), site layout, etc.
Format of Form 1 & Form 1A is available at DPCC. (http://www.dpcc.delhigovt.nic.in/pdf/EIA%20Form.pdf
The procedure of EC mentioned above for the construction project, is summarized below Figure
1.1:

Figure 1: Process of Environmental Clearance (EC)
Provide the checklist of construction projects to the client
Data will be provided by the client as per
checklist
Drawing will be provided by the project Architect
Calculate all the required
data
Total Population
Daily water requirement( ( Domestic+ Flushing
Capacity of STP
Rainwater Harvesting
Vehicle Parking
Total Solid waste
Vehicle Parking
Fill details in FORM 1 and FORM 1A and then prepare conceptual
plan
Presentation before SEAC
Recommended Not Recommended
SEIAA
EC Granted EC Not Granted

1.3. TOR (Terms of Reference)
The total time requirement for EC is 90 days. It is granted by SEAC which covers all the points
for the preparation of EIA report.
1.4. Validity of EC
The validity of prior EC is five years however, this period could be extended if the applicant
submits an application with an updated Form I, Supplementary Form IA to the regulatory
authority within the validity period, the concerned authority may extend this period for
construction projects or activities.
******

Chapter-2
2. Review of Literature
Zhao,Y. (2006) carried out the research on legal regine for construction projects in China and
conclude that Environmental Impact Assessment regine function as an effective decision making
tool in China for more sustainable development.
Datta,A.B. and Sengupta,I . ( 2014) studies on EIA and construction and concluded that EIA
can be considered as the appraisal of anticipated impacted impact that a proposal activity may
have on its surrounding.
Magsi,H and Torre A. (2013) worked on identifying the loop-holes &flaws of developing
countries in EIA outline and operating techniques which leads towards decision making that
were not a very accurate. He also recommended best practices for governance after finding out in
adequacies in the existing framework of EIA in Sindh, Pakistan
Wang.Y,(2003)after working on EIA in people’s republic of China while putting major
emphasis on finding on problems that exist while using EIA as a tool for protection of
environment and consequently he found out that if lack of transparency exist within the decision
makers and a EIA as a whole may lead to biased decisionsespecially in the absence of
environmental protection agency.
Modi, A and Shinkar, N.P. (2012) studied an EIA of road from Ujjain to Jaora and finds that
heavy lose of road side trees resultant in increase in Air and Noise pollution.
Chang,A .etal., (2013) studied an EIA for the new engineering development project of Suao-
Hualian Section along the Eastern Freeway and finds that the EIA-PDRI Assessment Mode can
help set the preliminary scope of the project development while enhancing the EIA performance.

Chen, Z and Li, H (2004) worked upon the integrative methodologies for environmental
management in construction activities and identified that any construction project is inclusive of
integrated EMS with a general process in all steps of the projects and these steps are expected to
support developers and contractors manage their environmental performances very effectively
and efficiently china.
Liu K and Lai J.H. (2009) developed a hybrid analytical model using fuzzy logic and fuzzy
network process to study decision-support for EIA and thereafter proposed an advanced
technique could be applied in EIA of construction sector.
Rajaram.T and Das.A (2010) studied on screening process for EIA in India will be done by
enhancing effectiveness through ecological carrying capacity management system can provide
significant inputs to enhance the effectiveness of EIA process from screening to monitoring.
Paliwal. R (2006) carried out a study on EIA practice in India followed by a through SWOT
analysis and the major finding includes awareness of the general public, engagement of
environmental groups and the community at large that could help remove the threads form the
system.
Banham.W and Brew.D (2012) highlighted the post EIA implementation assessment effect in
India that led to rejection of a large no. of construction projects in India during the period of
1990 showcasing the negligence in carrying out the mitigation measures.
*******

Chapter-3
3. Preparation of Application for Environmental Clearance
3.1. ABOUT THE CASE
M/s Vatika Ltd. - a limited liability firm’s main objective is promoting the real estate
infrastructure & property developers, developers & financers and promoters. The corporate
office of the company is located at Gurgaon. It was decided by the management of the company
to develop a group housing colony in Gurgaon. Land measuring 18.08 acres had been already
acquired by the company at Village- Harsaru, Sector -88B, Gurgaon to develop and construct the
proposed project at the projected site. Government of Haryana has already issued the license
which is valid up to 25/10/2017 vide Directorate Town and Country Planning, Haryana License
No. 91 of 2013 dated 26/10/2013. The site being situated at NH-8 fits ideally for the project as it
is also near to Delhi and Gurgaon is going to become a hub for education and multispecialty
healthcare facilities. This area is already attracting well known builders and developers who are
developing the area very fast.
3.2. PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION AND NEIGHBOURHOOD
The proposed project site location is at Village- Harsaru, Sector -88B, District –Gurgaon. The
Co-ordinates are 28°26’21.50"N and 76°57'17.04"E. The nearest highway is NH-8 which is
approx. 5 Kms south-west from project site. The nearest railway station is Garhi Harsaru
Railway Station at a distance of approx. 2.5 Km. eastwards from the proposed project site. The
nearest airport is Indira Gandhi International Airport at a distance of approx. 21 km in northwest
direction from the project site. Project site is shown in 500 m radius of Google maps (see below)
Figure 2.

Figure-2: 500 m radius google map showing the project site

3.3. PROJECT OUTLINE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL PROSPECT
The total estimated land area of the proposed project for group housing colony is 76080 m2
(18.80 Acres). The factual details are provided below in Table 2.
SALIENT FEATURES OF PROJECT: Salient features of the project are as follows:-
Table 2: Area Statement
S. No. Particulars Area ( m2)
1. Project Name Vatika Urban Expression
M/s Vatika Ltd.
2. Activity in the complex
Residential Apartments, EWS Apartments,
Nursery School, Service Apartments and
Commercial Area
3. Total Plot Area 76080 m2/18.80 Acres
4. Net Plot Area 69939.685 m2/17.2825 Acres
5. Built-up area (FAR + Non-FAR) 227629.683 m2
6.
Permissible Ground Coverage @
35%
24478.890 m2
Proposed Ground Coverage @
17.52%
12255.97 m2
7.
Permissible FAR @ 175% 122394.449 m2
Proposed FAR @ 174.898% 122323.503 m2
8.
Non-FAR (Basement Area + Stilt
Area)
73896.23 + 31409.95 = 105306.18 m2
9. Maximum Height 97.78 m
10. Maximum No. of Floor G + 29
11.
Required Parking 1369 ECS
Proposed Parking 1434 ECS

12. Power Requirement & Sources
5380 KW
Source: Dakshin Haryana BizliVitran Nigam
(DHBVN)
13. No. of DG sets
42 DG sets of total capacity 10820 KVA (41 ×
260 + 1 × 160 KVA)
14. Water requirement & Sources
Total Water Requirement: 719 KLD
Fresh Water Requirement: 425 KLD
Treated/Recycled Water Requirement: 294 KLD
Source: HUDA
15. Sewage Treatment & Disposal
STP capacity : 700 KLD
Sewage discharge: 580 KLD of water
16. Estimated Population 6329 persons
17. Connectivity
The project site is connected to 12 m wide
service roads which shall provided access to
other parts of the city.
18.
Permissible green area @ 30% 20981.91 m2
Proposed green area @ 32.62% 22814.33 m2
19. Cost of the project 670 Crores (Approx.)

3.4. TOTAL DENSITY OF LOCAL POPULATION
The estimated total population of the project will be 6329 persons. The detailed breakup of the
locality in terms of population is given below in the following Table 3.
Table-3: Population Break up
S. No. Unit Type Dwelling Unit Total Population
1 Residential Apartment @ 5 724 3620
2 EWS Apartment @ 5 128 640
3 Servant Units @ 2 73 146
4
Community Building @ 3
sqm/person
534.563 178
5
Convenient Shopping @ 3
sqm/person
334.731 112
6
Nursery School-1 @ 4 sqm/person
Ground Floor 818.708 205
First Floor 818.708 205
7
Nursery School- @ 4 sqm/person
Ground Floor 863.295 216
First Floor 863.295 216
Second Floor 863.295 216
8 Visitors @ 10% of total population -- 575
Total Population
6329 persons
3.5. ESTIMATED BUDGET OF PROPOSED PROJECT
The estimated cost of the project is Rs 670 Crores which includes the cost of the land as well as
the developing the site.

3.6. QUANTITY OF DAILY DEMAND FOR WATER
The water will be supplied through Municipal Water Supply. Total demand for water for the
project on a daily basis will be approximately 719.19 KLD, out of which 420 KLD is fresh water
requirement and 244 KLD is recycled/treated water. The daily water requirement calculation is
given below in Table 4.
Table-4: Calculations for Daily Water Demand
S.
No.
Particulars Occupancy
Rate of
water
demand
Water Requirement (KLD)
Domestic Flushing Total
1 Residential Apartment 3620 135 325.80 162.90 488.70
2 EWS Apartment 640 135 57.60 28.80 86.40
3 Servant Units 146 135 13.14 6.57 19.71
4 Community Building 178 45 2.67 5.34 8.01
5 Convenient Shopping 112 45 1.68 3.36 5.04
6 Nursery School-1 410 45 6.15 12.30 18.45
7 Nursery School-1 648 45 9.72 19.44 29.16
8 Visitors 575 15 3.45 5.17 8.62
8 Horticulture
22814.33
m2 1 lit/sqm NIL NIL 23.00
10 DG Cooling -- -- NIL NIL 27.10
11
Make-up water
requirement
(Swimming Pool &
Sunken Court)
-- -- NIL NIL 5.00
Total
420.21
Say 420 KLD
243.88
Say 244 KLD
719.19
Say 719
KLD

Figure-3: Water Balance Diagram

Wastewater Generation & Treatment:
The wastewater generated will be treated through proposed Sewage Treatment Plant having the
capacity of 700 KLD of MBBR technology inside the project premises. Approximately 522
KLD of water will be obtained by recycling from proposed Sewage Treatment Plant which will
be used for flushing, horticulture, DG cooling purposes and rest of treated water will be given to
water tanker suppliers for construction site.
3.7. SEWAGE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Moving Bed Bioreactor Technology:
Sewerage System
Sewage from all units will flow by gravity through the network of an external sewage and will be
collected in the proposed sewage treatment plant.
The benefits of providing the STP(Sewage Treatment Plant) with respect to the above conditions
are:
 A steep reduction in quantity of net daily water requirements, and the treated waste water
are used for for Horticultural purposes.
 The public utilities reduced dependence for water supply and sewerage systems.
 The sludge obtained will be rich in organic content and could be used as fertilizer in
agricultural purposes.
a. Wastewater Details
(a) Daily load : 580 KLD
(b) Duration of flow to STP : 24 hours
(c) Temperature : Maximum 32oC
(d) pH : 7 to 9.5
(e) Colour : Mild
(f) T.S.S. (mg/l) : 150-400 mg/l
(g) BOD5 (mg/l) : 200-600 mg/l
(h) COD (mg/l) : 600-800 mg/l

b. Final discharge characteristics
(a) pH : 7.5 to 8.5
(b) Oil & Grease : <10 mg/l
(c) B.O.D. : <10 mg/l
(d) C.O.D. : <60 mg/l
(e) Total Suspended Solids : <50 mg/l
c. Treatment Technology
The sewage will be first passed through a Bar Screen Chamber where any extraneous matter
would get trapped. The influent would overflow by gravity to the Oil & Grease Chamber which
is provided for safety so that the oil may not inhibit the biological growth in the MBBR reactors.
The sewage then moves towards the Equalization Tank which facilitates to control the changes in
flow rate and minimize the characteristics, otherwise operational problems may arise in proper
functioning of the system. Coarse air bubble diffusion technique is used here to keep the sewage
in mixed condition.
The Bio Reactor is based on the Fluidized Random Aerobic Reactor which combines the
advantage of an Activated Sludge Plant with the Random distribution systems such as Biofilter
with capacities that could be as low as 1/10th of ASP and fractional power consumption, such a
reactor is ideal for the efficient removal of BOD and organics from the wastewater.
The tanks are packed with RIGID PP-UV-sterilized Gas Fluted Media with liquid random
distribution wherein air diffusers are placed to uniformly release air across the tanks.
Working Principle:
The MBBR works very similarly as the submerged fixed film process and in same principle the
only difference being that the media keeps floating around(not fixed) in the aeration tank. The
main advantage of this system over the submerged fixed film process is that it does not clog the

media. This prevents recirculation of sludge to a great extent in comparison of usual technologies
the MBBR is smaller and efficient, user friendly. It is highly flexible in terms of the reactor
tank’s design.
Figure-4: Schematic design of STP of MBBR Technology
Sewage Quality:
The Sewage discharged from the Bio reactor system contains sloughed biological solids, while
being completely free of soluble organic chemicals. The quantity of suspended solids and the
concentration of soluble BOD in the sewage while enetering inside the system has a substantial
effect on the quantity of the biological solids thereby making it greatly necessary to have some
means of separating the biological mass from the sewage. Package unit contains tube settlers for
sedimentation and 60 Gross fluted Rigid PVC fill media for the FAB units to treat the
wastewater for discharge into the receiving waters and/or the sanitary sewers as per the local
regulations. The media thickness changes with the design parameters/depth of the unit and can
vary from 0.25 to 0.40 mm thickness.

1. Tube Settler: Here we are providing the Tube Settler along with the PVC media which will
enhance the contact period and thereby the improved performance. The Tube settler will have a
determined lope in the bottom to collect the suspended solids from the waste water. The sludge
will be suited to the Sludge Drying Beds.
2. Pressure Sand Filter: Here the treated water coming from the TSS will be treated for the
suspended impurity removal.
3. Activated Carbon Filter: Here the water coming from the ACF will be treated for colour
removal, suspended impurity removal and the treated water shall be sent to the sewer.
4. Filter Press: A filter is typically nothing but a set of recessed plates compressed by hydraulic
pumps from both the ends. One key thing to note here is that the pressure on the plates should be
enough to resist the internal pressure created internally by the sludge pumping system. This kind
of a vertically setup plates enables watertight and easy discharge of cakes due to the scheme of
plates’ layout. The two grooved surfaces are finely or tightly wrapped by filter clothes.
Primary Treatment: This is the basic step of sewage treatment plant which is done mostly to
remove coarse particles, oil & grease and later on other co agents are added to further remove
suspended solids by the way of sedimentation. After this technique is completed the BOD, COD,
TSS etc levels are significantly reduced to approx. 20% of initial levels
Secondary Treatment:
This step comes second in sewage treatment mostly aided by a aerobic process of the treated
water which helps in bacterial growth and then chemicals and oxygen are added to enhance the
growth of bacteria which in turn helps in settling down the biological waste as sludge. It has been
noticed that after this process the levels of BOD, COD, TSS, O&G etc after this process comes
down to normal levels.
Tertiary Treatment:
This is the final step of the waste water treatment where Sodium Hypo Chloride is mixed with
the sludge and then is made to pass though PSF dual media filter and activated carbon filter

where anthracite, sand and activated carbon is used as filter media. The final outlet water
conforms to Bio Assay test of 90% fish water after all the prescribed limits are achieved.
Table 6: Technical Specifications for Sewage Treatment Plant
ITEMS BRIFE DESCRIPTION
1.0 BAR SCREEN
Number off ONE
SIZE 1.5X1.5m & spacing 20 mm
M.O.C SS-304
2.0 SCREEN CHAMBER CUM OIL &
GREASE TRAP
Number off One
Type Under ground to receive Sewage below bar screen.
Capacity 30.0 cum
Dimension 3.5 m X 2.8 X 2.5 M ( SWD )
M.O.C. R.C.C
3.0 EQUALIZATION TANK
Number off One
TYPE
under ground to receive Sewage below oil grease
trap
Capacity 150.0 cum
M.O.C R.C.C
4.0 FLOCCULATION TANK
Number off Two
Type
Under ground to receive Sewage below equalization
tank
Capacity/Size Suitable for 700 KLD

M.O.C RCC
Type Agitated tank
5.0 PRIMARY SETTLER TANK
Number off Two
Type
Under ground to receive Sewage below
Flocculation tank
Capacity Suitable for 700 KLD
M.O.C RCC
6.0 SEWAGE LIFTING PUMPS
Number off : ( 1 W + 1 S)
Capacity : 20.0 m3/hr at 8-10 m head
M.O.C. C.I. /PP
Make : Kirloskar/Eckon Eqv.
7.0 FAB TANK
Number off : Two
Type Air Agitated tank
M.O.C. : RCC
MEDIA : PVC
Capacity of media 1 lot
8.0 AIR BLOWER
Number off : TWO
Type Twin Lobe
Capacity 300 m3/hrs. @ 5000 mm wg
Make Everest/BETA/Eqv.

9.0 TUBE SETTLER
Number off : Two
Type. Inclined at 60 Deg
M.O.C. : RCC
Media M.O.C. PVC
Supports Provided
10.0 FILER FEED SUMP
Number off : One
Type
Under ground to receive the water from Tube
Settler
M.O.C. : R.C.C
11.0 FILTER FEED PUMP
Capacity : 22.0 m3/hr at 20-25 m head
Type : Positive Displacement
M.O.C. C.I. /PP
Make : Kirloskar/ Eckon Eqv.
12.0 SAND FILTER
Number off : One
Type : Down flow.
Pressure (Working) : 5.0 kg/cm2.
M.O.C. : MSFC

13.0 ACTIVATED CARBON FILTER
Number off : One
Type : Down flow.
Pressure (Working) : 3.0 kg/cm2.
M.O.C. : MSFC
14.0 SLUDGE HOLDING TANK
Number off One
Make BW/R.C.C
15.0 FILTER PRESS
Number off One
No. of Plate Nos.18
Size of Plate 910mm X 910mm
Make Welcome/ pharmatech/ equ
16.0 CONTROL PANEL
Number off ONE LOT
Components L&T Make
17.0 PIPE &FITTING ONE LOT
18.0 AIR LINE AND DIFFUERS 1 LOT
19.0 SLUDGE PUMP
Capacity : 5 m3/hr at 20 m head
Type : Positive Displacement
M.O.C. C.I. /PP

Make : Kirloskar/ Eckon Eqv.
20.0 Online Meters
PH Meter : One
Range 0-14
Make UKL/ASTER / equ
Flow Meter : One
3.8. RAIN WATER HARVESTING
Disposal system of storm water premises shall be self-supporting to escape any collection and
flooding of water. Drainage plan of Storm water of the project is enclosed. The total amount of
storm water excessflow depends upon many aspects such as characteristics of the streamarea,
duration of precipitation, intensity and the necessity of total time for such flow to reach the
drains. Drains should beplaced near the carriage way along either side of the streets. Rain water
excess flow from roads shall flow in the direction of the drains, taking the advantage of road
camber. Storm water from severalstrategies shall be attached to nearby drain by a pipe through
catch basins. So that, 18 rainwater harvesting pits are calculated this will catch the maximum
excess flow from the area at selected locations
1) Existing topography is agreeable to surface disposal, the network of storm water drainage
is planned to the nearby roads. Rain water pipes will take down all building roof rain
water.
2) Proposal of storm water system contains pipe drain, and seepage pits at regular intervals
for rain water harvesting and ground water recharging.
3) For basement parking, the rainwater from ramps will be collected in the basement storm
water storage in tank. This water will be pumped out to the nearby external storm water
drain.
4) Designing of the storm water drainage system shall be considered by rainfall of 48mm/hr
in Peak Hours. Design of rain water harvesting should satisfy the guidelines of CGWA.
Level of the ground water level is 10 meters bglin the area. Recharge structure should be
kept 3 m above form the bottom level. To avoid the choking of the recharge bore filter

media is placed at the bottom of the recharge well. There are following specifications of
the rain water harvesting plan:
 For regular cleaning catchments/roofs would be accessible.
 The surface of the root should be smooth, dense and hard which is less likely to be
damaged allowing release of material into the water. Most paints contain toxic
substances and may peel off since roof painting has been avoided.
 Install, the ends of all channels should be fixed with first flush device and wire mesh
screen. Mostly, The debris carried by the water from the rooftop like leaves, plastic
bags and paper pieces will get arrested by the mesh at the terrace outlet and to prevent
contamination by ensuring that the runoff from the first 10-20 minutes of rainfall is
flushed off.
 The system would not admit sewage or wastewater.
 There is no expectation of oil, grease or other pollutants in waste water in this area
where the system is connected to this system.
Table 6: Rainwater Harvesting Calculation
S.
No.
Particulars
Catchment Area
in m2 (A)
Runoff
Coefficient
(C)
Rainfall Intensity
in mm (I)
Discharge
(m3/hr)
1. Rooftop area 12255.97 0.85 45 468.79
2. Green area 22814.33 0.20 45 205.33
3. Paved area 34869.39 0.65 45 1019.93
Total Runoff 69939.69
1694.05
Total volume of storm water (Retention time=15 min.) = 1370.13 × 0.25
= 423.51 m3
Diameter and depth of a Recharge pit 3.0 m and 3.4 m correspondingly,

Single Recharge pit’s volume (πr2h) = 3.14 × 1.5 × 1.5 × 3.4
= 24.02 m3
Hence No. of pits required = 423.51/24.02= 17.6 Say 18 Pits
Proposed rain water harvesting pits for artificial rain water recharge in this the project is 18 pits.
Figure 5: Typical Rain Water Harvesting Pit Design
NO. OF PITS: 18

3.9. SPACE FOR PARKING
Car/vehicle parking facility should be Satisfactory at the proposed project site. Traffic can be
avoided by providing the satisfactory visitor parking for visitors so which allow smooth drive at
the location.
Required Parking:
Required parking for main unit @ 1.5 ECS/DU = 724 × 1.5 =1086 ECS
Required parking for EWS @ 5% of total required parking = 1086 × 5 %
= 54.3 or 55 ECS
Required parking for Visitors @ 20% of total required parking = 1141 x 20%
= 228 ECS
Total parking required = 1086 + 55+ 228 = 1369 ECS
Proposed Parking:
Area proposed for parking on surface = 1933.642 m2
Area required for parking per ECS = 25 m2
Proposed surface parking = 1933.642/25 = 77.3 ECS Say 77 ECS
Area of Basement-1 = 37374.81 m2
Area proposed for parking in Basement-1 = 29172.429 m2
Parking Capacity of Basement-1 = 29172.429/35 m2 = 833 ECS
Proposed parking in basement-1 = 683 ECS
Area of Basement-2 = 36521.42 m2

Area proposed for parking in Basement-2 = 28559.737 m2
Parking Capacity of Basement-2 = 28559.737/35 m2 = 816 ECS
Proposed parking in basement-2 = 674 ECS
Total Proposed Parking =77 + 683 + 674 = 1434 ECS
Hence, adequate space for 1434 ECS will be provided within the project premises.

3.10. DEMAND OF ELECTRICITY
Supply of electricity shall be provided by Dakshin Haryana BijliVitran Nigam (DHBVN). The
connected consumption for the group housing colony will be 5380 KWapprox.
Details of Diesel Generator Sets: There is provision of 7 no. of DG sets having total capacity of
5380 KW i.e. 42 DG sets of total capacity of 10820 KVA (41×260 + 1×160 KVA). The DG sets
will be prepared with acoustic attachment to minimize the noise generation and acceptable stack
height for accurate dispersion.
3.11. SOLID WASTE GENERATION
During the both construction and operation phase solid waste will be generate. Solid waste like
MS rods, excavated materials, used bags,concrete; tiles, bricks, wood etcare generated during the
construction phase. For the management of solid waste following steps are proposed:
 Mostly, storage of construction materials, construction backyards are proposed.
 During the later stages of construction an Excavated material like topsoil and stones will
be stacked for reuse
 The storage of excavated top soil will be reused for landscaping of the proposed Group
housing colony project.
 Utilization of remaining soil is done by refilling / rising of site level at locations/ selling
to external agency for construction.

Figure 6: Solid Waste Management Scheme during Construction Phase
Construction
waste,
Broken Bricks,
Waste Plaster
Used in re-filling,
raising site level
Solid Waste
Construction
Waste
Empty cement
Bags, Containers
etc.
Sold to agency
for recycling
Food Waste
Excavated Soil
Top soil conserved for
landscaping, balance
used in re-filling
As per MSW
Rules, 2000
and
amended
Rules, 2008
During the operation phase, waste will generate from service apartment, retail area, food court
area and multiplex area. Mainly domestic waste isgenerated from the project is 2253.9 kg/day
approx.

Table 7: Calculated Solid Waste Generation
S. No.
Category of Solid
Waste
Waste Generation
Rate
(kg/cap/day)
Total
Population
Waste
Generated
(kg/day)
1.
Residential Refuse 0.45
3620 1629
2.
EWS Refuse 0.45
640 288
3.
Servant Refuse 0.45
146 65.7
4.
Community Building 0.15
178 26.7
5.
Convenient Shopping 0.15
112 16.8
6.
Nursery School-1
Ground Floor
0.15
205 30.75
First Floor
0.15
205 30.75
7.
Nursery School-2
Ground Floor
0.15
216 32.4
First Floor
0.15
216 32.4
Second Floor
0.15
216 32.4
8. Visitors
0.12
575 69
Total
2253.9
Say 2254
kg/day

(Source: For Waste Collection, Chapter 3, Table 3.6, Page no. 49, Central Public Health & Environment
Engineering Organization, Ministry of Urban Development, (Government of India, May 2000))
Figure 7 : Solid Waste Management Scheme during Operation Phase
Biodegradable Waste
(1578 kg/day)
Non-Biodegradable Waste
(676 kg/day)
Green Bins
Vermicomposting
Manure
Blue Bins Dark Gray Bins
Final disposal through a
Govt. approved agency to
recyclingindustry
There will be following arrangements made at the site in accordance to Municipal Solid
Waste Rules, 2000 and amended Rules, 2008.
1 Collection and Separation of waste
1. Collection of domestic waste is done by door to door collecting system in colored
bins from domesticthings.
2. Colorcoded bins are provided for dry recyclables and bio-degradable waste.
3. Proposed institutional waste collection is done in Green and Blue bins for bio-degradable
and non-bio-degradable.
4. Open areas like parks etc. are facilitate with Litter bin.
Final disposal
through a Govt.
approved agency
Solid Waste
(2254 kg/day)
Recyclable Waste
(473 kg/day)
Non-Recyclable Waste
(203 kg/day)

Treatment of solid waste
Bio-Degradable wastes
1. Vermin composting techniqueis used forthe compost of Bio-degradable waste.
2. STP sludge will be proposed for horticultural.
3. Horticultural Waste will composted and it will use for gardening purposes.
Biodegradable wastes
1. Grass Recycling – The cropped grass will be spread on the green area. It will act as
manure after decomposition.
2. Recyclable wastes will be retailed to recyclables.
3. Hazardous wastes like waste oil will be retailed to approved recyclers.
2 Disposal
Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000 and amended Rules,
2008 is used for the disposal of garbage through government officialorganization for land
filling. The solid waste management scheme is represented in the above figure.
3.12. GREEN AREA
Total green area measures 22814.33 m2 i.e. 32.62 % of the net plot areaunder tree plantation
inside the offices and along the roads. Ageless tall and ornamental trees and ornamental shrubs
are proposed to be planted at the project site.
Table 8: Green Area Calculation
S. No. Description Area (m2)
1.
Total Green Area Required @ 30% of the Net Plot Area
(69939.685 m2)
20981.91
2. Total Green area proposed @ 32.62 % 22814.33
a. Peripheral Plantation Area @ 11.32% 7917.17
b. Avenue Plantation Area (spread 3> m) @ 10% 6993.97
c. Water Body Area @ 5.4% 3776.74
d. Shrubs Plantation Area @ 5.9% 4126.44

Plantation and landscaping
Variety of the plant species are selected on the basis of their flexibility to the surviving
geographical conditions.
Green Belt Development Plan
0.3 m × 0.3 m sizematrix was adopted for plantation of the green belt development including a
pit with a spacing of 2 m x 2 m. Moreover, earth filling and manure requirement is also
anticipated for the proper balance of nutrition and saplings’ nourishment. Recommendations also
include the plantation to be taken up at random and the aspects of landscaping to be taken into
account.
Medium height trees (7 m to 10 m) and some shrubs (5 m height) for multi-layered plantation for
the green belt will be taken. Along with some creepers to be planted through out the boundary
wall thereby enhancingthe capacity of insulation.
Selection of Plant Species for Green Belt Development
The development depends on various factors such as climate, elevation and soil.
S. No. NAME OF SPECIES (SHRUBS)
Botanical Name Common Name
1 Artocarppusheterophyllus Kathal
2 Balanitesroxburghii Desert - Date
3 Bambusaarundinacia Thorny Bamboo
4 Bambusa vulgaris Golden Bamboo
5 Alstoniascholans Apocynaceae
6 Acacia catechu Khair

7 Bauhinia acuninata Kanchan
8 Callistemon citrinus Bottle brush
9 Citrus aurantium Nebu
10 Durantarepens Duranta
S. No. NAME OF SPECIES (TREES)
Botanical Name Common Name
1 Bauhinia Semla Semla
2 Albiziachinensis Siran
3 Albizialebbeck The Siris tree
4 Cassia pumila Yellow Cassia
5 Anthocephaluschinensis Kadamba
6 Azadirachtaindica Neem Tree
7 Delbergialatifolio Black wood
8 Delonixregia Gulmohar
9 Eucalyptus citriodora Eucalyptus
10 Ficusbenghalensis Banyan Tree
11 Ficuselastiaca Indian Rubber Tree
12 Ficusreligosa Peepal Tree
13 Grevillearobusta Silky Oak

14 Jacaranda mimosaeolia Nil - Gulmohar
15 Mangiferaindica Mango Tree
No evidence for support to significant vegetation exists. A multilayered peripheral greenbelt of
local plant species is proposed to add toits aesthetic value of the areaas well as providing an
awesome habitat for various groups of fauna. The existing surrounding land is urban without
much habitat for wild species. Whereas this multilayered auxiliary greenbelt will provide an
excellent habitat area for the native fauna. The project will however not have any direct or
indirect impacts on the avifauna of the area. But it is worth mentioning that planting of trees
bearing fruits in the greenbelt will be an amazing attraction to the local bird population.
3.13. DETAIL OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
List of building materials being used at site:
1. Coarse sand
2. Fine sand
3. Stone aggregate
4. Stone for masonry work
5. Cement
6. Reinforcement steel
7. Pipe scaffolding (cup lock system)
8. Bricks
9. CLC fly ash blocks
10. Crazy (white marble) in grey cement
11. P.V.C. conduit
12. MDS, MCBs
13. PVC overhead water tanks
14. 2 1/2'’ thick red colour paver tiles
15. PPR (ISI marked)
16. PVC waste water lines
17. S.W. sewer line up to main sewer

18. PVC rain water down take
19. Stainless steel sink in kitchen
20. Joinery hardware- ISI marked
3.14. MATERIALS USED FOR CONSTRUCTION & THEIR U VALUES
S.
No
Building Material Proposed with U &
R Values
‘R’ Values
(in Sq m.
Deg C/
Watts )
‘U’ Values
(in Watts/
Sq m. Deg
C)
Solar Heat
Gain Factor
1.
WALL
Brick wall (230 mm thick), both side
thick sand cement plaster (12-18mm)
with insulation
0.352 2.84 1.12
2.
ROOF
200 mm RCC slab with mud phuska&
clay tiles with 75 mm insulation
0.409 2.44 1.00
3.
GLASS
( Double glaze glass)
0.333 3.00 1.8
********

Chapter-4
4. Analysis and Data Collection
4.1. ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
The Environment Management Plan (EMP) is a set of documented framework that contains the
mitigation measures for each and every respective component of environment which has a
potential future treat due to the increased activities taking place during construction&operational
phase of the project which shall be discussed in detail in subsections later.
Key points of an EMP:
 It is guidedby the rules and regulationsprescribed by the MoEF and CPCB/ SPCB while
preparing an EMP.
 Itconfirms that the components of the facilities are operated strictly in accordance with
the design.
 A management process that makes sure thatevery operation is carried out under
supervision and monitoring
 Addresses complaints of public if any during any phase of construction and operation of
the facilities very effectively and
 A management system that has remedial measures in place which could be implemented
immediately.
An effective EMP facilitates different ways to manage environmental impacts that might arise
due to construction or operational activities which is major benefit and hence allows maintaining
environmental harmony.Secondary benefits include controlling of cost and better relations with
the projects stakeholders including society.
4.2. THE FOUR MAJOR COMPONENTS OF EMP
 Commitment & Policy: The management is obliged toendeavor to facilitate, deliver and
execute the Environmental Management Plan which encompasses all environmental
factors related to water, air, noise and land.

 Planning: Planning involves finding out the key factors like impacts on environment,
compliance issues and primary goals of environmental management.
 Implementation:This is about executing the plan amongst the resources which is
available to Construction Company or real estate developers, their accountability and
providing appropriate training to workers and staff.
 Measurement & Evaluation:One of the key components is constant monitoring and
evaluating if the activities are executed as per plan and counter measures are taken
wherever necessary and if records are maintained properly.
M/s Vatika Ltd. is advisedto form a monitoring committee as part of the EMP, with the site in-charge
heading the team and supported bythe representatives of the project implementation team
and environmental group. It would be the responsibility of the committee to make smooth
execution of operation and management of the EMP also taking care of regulatory compliance.
The proposed site is currently unproductive land. It has been assumed that there shall be no
hostile outcome on the land use activities in the project area due to the construction operations of
the project. The site is assigned for commercial development as per the Development Plan of
Gurgaon -Manesar Urban Complex-2021. The project will strictly follow the Building
Regulation Norms of National Building Code. HUDA building by-laws and norms of Town and
Country Planning on Covered Land, Floor Area Ratio, Height, Fire Safety Requirements, Section
and Elevation Design and other parameters will be strictly followed.
Since, careful planning has been taken into account before executing the project there will be a
lot ofprepared open spaces and green acres. Estimated area for landscaping is about 22814.33
m2. If the plan is executed well it will have an overall positive impact in the surrounding
environment and the nearby local community.
There shall be no land disturbance resulting in erosion, subsidence and instability as it is a flat
land. As per the seismic zone map of Indiathe site comes under the zone IV which also indicates
very less damage risk zone. The project has been planned as per Indian Standards Codes which
implies that the project will be earthquake resistant.
No natural drainage routes has been intersected by this project. Also there are no perennial or
non-perennial drainage systemslies in the area of the project.

The only work which requires excavation in the proposed project is establishment of the Group
housing Colony’s pillar. The same material could be used for filling the excavated areawithout
the need for any extra material.The excavated topsoil shall be stored separately and used within
the project site for greenbelt development. Hence, no movement of soil to and from the site is
expected.
The surrounding around the site is mostly flat land and comprises of an urbanized stretch. There
are also no low lying areas or wetlands nearby.
The proposed construction poses no significant health hazard. The source of fugitive dust
generation during period of construction will be vehicular movement and material handling.
Water sprinklers will be used to suppress fugitive dust emission as and when required to
minimizeany negative impact due to the same. However, the impacts will be confined to
laborers/workers particularly with regard to occupational exposure. Masks, Ear plugs etc. and
other Personal Protective Equipments will be provided to the workers working in the potential
areas.
Careful design, planning and good site management would minimize waste of materials
.Construction wastes will be segregated as much as possible at site itself to increase the
feasibility of recycling concrete and masonry as filling material and steel pieces as saleable
scrap. Empty packaging materials, drums, glass, tin, paper, plastic, pet bottles, wood, thermocol
and other packaging materials, etc will be disposed through recyclers. The construction spoils
will be temporarily stored at designated dumpsite located inside the site premises. Later on these
wastes will be used for land filling / leveling work within the site premises.
4.3. Potential Impacts and Remedial Measures of Environmental Components
To know efficiency of pollution prevention and control measures at the project site during the
construction phase, Post Environmental Clearance monitoring is scheduled. All the testing was

conducted by “Ministry of Environment and Forests” recognized laboratory and NABL
accredited laboratory, and copies of the testing reports are attached with this Annexure.
The Post Environmental Clearance monitoring was done in the month of June 2012, for
following environmental parameters:
(i) Ground Water of the area
(ii) Soil of the area
(iii) Ambient Noise
(iv) Ambient Air Quality
(v) Stacks of DG sets being used at the site.
The results of the monitoring are discussed in the subsequent sections.The other components of
EMP are described below:
a) Water Quality: Following are the impacts and mitigation measures on water from the
proposed activity:
i. Ground Water Quality
 Impacts from Construction Phase: It accounts of waste water generated from
temporary labor tents.
 Mitigation Measures during Construction Phase: Mobile Toilets will be used
while construction of the project is going on for use by the labourers. Soak Pit/
Septic Tank will be proposed to manage the wastewater generated from labour
tents. Hence, no significant impact is from the construction activity.
 Impacts from Operation Phase- It consists of domestic sewage from domestic use
and flushing.
 Mitigation Measures during Operation Phase: A Sewage Treatment Plant will
provided for the recycling of the sewage generated from the proposed activity and
the recycled water will be reused for the purpose of flushing, horticulture and DG
cooling. Hence, no negative or significant impact on ground water quality is
envisaged.
 Ground Water Quantity/Ground Water Depletion
 Impacts from Construction Phase- It accounts of usage of ground water for
construction activity.

 Mitigation Measured during Construction Phase: No groundwater will be used
for construction purpose. STP treated water will be used for construction
activity. There is no significant impact on ground water quality envisaged.
 Impacts from Operation Phase: Ground water depletion for fresh water
requirement for residents of the group housing colony.
 Mitigation Measures during Operation Phase: Fresh water requirement will be
fulfilled by HUDA Supply and the Rain Water Harvesting Scheme is also
proposed for recharging of ground water.
 Quality of Surface Water / Contamination in Surface Water
 Impacts on Construction Phase: It often accounts of Surface runoff from site
during the construction activity.
 Mitigation Measures during Construction Phase: Under Controls through EMP &
Design, to control surface run-off, Silt traps and similar other steps such as on site
diversion ditches will be constructed additionally during site development. Since
there is no surface water receiving bodyno off-site impact is envisaged in the core
zone.
 Impacts from Operation Phase- It relates with discharging of domestic wastewater
and rain water in sewer.
 Mitigation Measures during Operation Phase: Domestic waste water will be
recycled in STP and reused in flushing, horticulture and DG cooling and Rain
water harvesting pits has been proposed for the management of storm water.
Hence, no water or waste water will be discharge outside the project premises.
Result:For the analysis of water quality in the project site one sample was collected from the
site.
Monitoring Methodology
The sample was analyzed for physical, chemical and biological parameters (as per BIS Standards
IS: 10500). The sampling was done very carefully using all basic precautions and cares to
avoidany contamination. Prescribed BIS and APHA procedures werefollowed in sampling with
standard methods and procedures.

Result of Ground Water Quality Monitoring
S.
No.
Parameter Result Test-Method
Limits of IS:10500 -2012
Requirem
ent
(Acceptab
le limit)
Permissible
limit (no
presence of alt.
source)
1. pH (at 25 0C) 7.56 APHA 22nd Edition, 4500-H+ B 6.5 to 8.5 No Relaxation
2. Colour (Hazen Unit) <5.0 APHA 22nd Edition, 2120 B
5 15
3. Turbidity (NTU) <1.0 APHA 22nd Edition, 2130 (B)
1 5
4. Odour Unobjectionable
APHA 22nd Edition, 2150
Agreeable Agreeable
5. Taste Agreeable
APHA 22nd Edition, 2160
Agreeable Agreeable
6. Specific Conductance (mS/cm) 0.271 APHA 22nd Edition, 2510 B -- --
7. Total Hardness as CaCO3 (mg/l) 320.50
APHA 22nd Edition, 2340 C
200 600
8. Chloride as Cl- (mg/l) 68.50
APHA 22nd Edition, 4500-Cl- B
250 1000
9. Calcium as Ca (mg/l) 90.50 APHA 22nd Edition, 3500 Ca B
75 200
10 Magnesium as Mg (mg/l) 23.01
APHA 22nd Edition, 2340 B
30 100
11 Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l) 415.36
APHA 22nd Edition, 2540 C
500 2000
12 Alkalinity as CaCO3, (mg/l)
232.42 APHA 22nd Edition, 2320 B 200
600
13 Iron as Fe (mg/l) 0.25 APHA 22nd Edition, 3500-Fe B
0.3 No Relaxation
14 Fluoride as F (mg/l) 0.34 APHA 22nd Edition, 4500-F- D
1.0
1.5
15 Sulphate as SO4 (mg/l) 30.41 APHA 22nd Edition, 4500 E
200 400
16 Nitrate as NO3 (mg/l) 0.10 IS 3025 (P-34) 1988 45 No Relaxation
17 Sodium (mg/l) 26.00 APHA 22nd Edition, 3500 Na B -- --
18 Potassium(mg/l)
5.00
APHA 22nd Edition, 3500 K B
-- --
Interpretation of the results
Water sample was analyzed for their physical, chemical and biological characteristics. pH value is
observed 7.56, Total Hardness is observed 320.50mg/l, Iron value is 0.25 mg/l, Chloride value is
68.50 mg/l, TDS is observed 415.36 mg/l, Calcium is observed 90.50 mg/l, Magnesium is

observed 23.01 mg/l and Alkalinity is observed 232.42 mg/l. All parameters observed are well
within the standards prescribed as per IS: 10500 except Total Hardness, Total dissolved solids and
Alkalinity, which are slightly above the desirable limit but within the permissible limit.
b) Air Quality: Potential impacts of Air Quality are :
 During Construction Phase
 Dust Emissions- A huge amount of dust will be generated during the construction phase
due to loading and unloading activities.
The dust wil be suppressed by water sprinklers.
 Emissions of PM2.5 & PM10, Sulphur dioxide, Oxides of Nitrogen and Carbon Monoxide-
Due to operation of the construction equipments and vehicles during construction phase,
PM2.5 & PM10, Sulphur dioxide, Oxides of Nitrogen and Carbon Monoxide will be
generated in the surrounding of the project site.
To mitigate the impacts from construction equipments, equipments will be maintained regularly
by oiling and greasing. The Pollution Under Check (PUC) vehicles will be used to reduce the
projected impacts.
 During Operation Phase
Impacts: Running of DG sets and vehicles will be used during operation phase of the project and
results increase in SO2 and NOx.
Mitigation Measures: Stack Height of DG sets will be maintained as per norms recommended by
CPCB for the proper dispersion of smoke into the air.
PUC certified vehicles will be used by all the residents of the group housing colony.
Result- Ambient Air Quality monitoring was done on 12/09/2013 to 12/09/2013 and 12/09/2013
to 12/09/2013 at the site. The sample for Particulate Matter, Sulphur dioxide, NO2, O3, Pb, CO,
C6H6, BaP, As and Ni was collected adjacent to D Tower at the project site and tested as per the
standard methods.

Ambient Air Quality adjacent to D Tower at the Project Site
Monitored Parameters
Monitoring
(Adjacent to D
Tower)
Monitoring
(Adjacent to D
Tower)
Units
NAAQS
Industrial,
residential,
Rural &
other Area
Particulate Matter (PM2.5) 33.54 34.71 μg/m3 60
Particulate Matter (PM10) 80.46 82.35 μg/m3 100
Nitrogen Dioxide (as NO2) 25.62 26.83 μg/m3 80
Oxide of Nitrogen (as NO2) 12.41 13.25 μg/m3 80
Carbon Monoxide (as CO) <0.5 <0.5 mg/m3 4(1-hr)
Interpretation of the Results
The interpretations of the results of each parameter are discussed below.
1. Particulate Matter (PM2.5)
The 24-hourly value of concentration of PM2.5was found to be 33.54 μg/m3on 12/09/2013 to
12/09/2013 whereas it is found to be 34.71 μg/m3 on 12/09/2013 to 12/09/2013. The values are
slightly above the prescribed standard at the construction site.

Figure-8 : Concentration of PM2.5 at theMonitoring Location
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
PM2.5
Result AAQ-1 AAQ-2 NAAQS
Results of PM2.5 adjacent to D Tower of the project site
ppm
Sampling Location
Concentration of PM2.5
(μg/m3)
Result
Result
NO2
Limit
Adjacent to D Tower 33.54 34.71 60

2. Particulate Matter (PM10)
The 24-hourly value of concentration of PM10adjacent to D Tower was found to be 80.46 μg/m3
on 12/09/2013 to 12/09/2013 whereas it is found to be 82.35 μg/m3 on 12/09/2013 to
12/09/2013. The values are exceeding the limit of 100 μg/m3 as per the NAAQs, 2009.
Figure-9: Concentration of PM10 at theMonitoring Location
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
PM10
ppm
Results of PM10 adjacent to D Tower of the project site
Sampling Location
Concentration of PM 10
(μg/m3)
Result
Result
NO2
Limit

3. Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)
The 24-hourly value of concentration of SO2adjacent to D Tower was found 12.41 μg/m3 on
12/09/2013 to 12/09/2013 whereas it was found 13.25 μg/m3 on 12/09/2013 to 12/09/2013. It can
be seen from the results of observingtime is 24 hours concentration is within the limit of 80
μg/m3 as per the NAAQS, 2009.
Figure-10 : Concentration of SO2 at theMonitoring Location
SO2
NO2
Results of SO2 adjacent to D Tower of the project site
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
ppm
Sampling Location
Concentration of SO2
(μg/m3)
Result
Result
Limit

4. Oxides of Nitrogen (NO2)
The 24-hourly value of concentration of NO2adjacent to D Tower was found 25.62 μg/m3 on
12/09/2013 to 12/09/2013 whereas it was found 26.83 μg/m3 on 12/09/2013 to 12/09/2013. It can
be seen from the results of observing time is 24 hours concentration is within the limit of 80
μg/m3 as per the NAAQS, 2009. Air lab report 1 and graphs.
Results of NO2 adjacent to D Tower of the project site
Sampling Location
Concentration of NO2
(μg/m3)
Result
(05.06.2012 to
06.06.2012)
Result
(06.06.2012 to
07.06.2012)
Limit
Figure-11: Concentration of NO2 at theMonitoring Location

90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
NO2
ppm
NO2
5. Lead (Pb), Carbon Monoxide (CO), Ammonia (NH3), Benzene (C6H6), Benzo-a-Pyrene
(BaP), Arsenic (As), Nickel (Ni)
The above mentioned parameters were monitored adjacent to D Tower of the project site on
12/09/2013 to 12/09/2013, all the parameters were well within the limits at the monitoring site.

c) Noise Environment: Following are the impacts and mitigation measures on Noise
Environment from the proposed project:
 During Construction Phase:
Impact: A vibrant noise will be generated from equipments of construction during building
work of construction.
Mitigation: PPEs like Earplugs and Earmuffs etc. will be supplied to the labour to mitigate
the impact of noise.
 During Phase of operation:
Impact: Due to running of DG sets and vehicles, a small amount of noise is anticipated from
the proposed project.
Mitigation: Acoustic enclosure will be used for DG set and noise limit of 25 dB will be
maintained. Servicing of vehicles will be done regularly by the residents of the group
housing colony. No Horns will be used in the silence zone and institutional zone. In
additional, green belt will be madenear the project to scatter the noise in the study area.
Result:To know the Ambient Noise at the site, Ambient Noise Level monitoring for day time
and night time was conducted from 11/09/2013 to 12/09/2013 on the project site.
Noise Level Monitoring
S.
No.
Parameters
Test Result dB (A)
Day Time
(6:00 am to 10:00 pm)
Night Time
(10:00 pm to 06:00 am)
1. Leq 51.60 44.75
2. Lmin 46.70 41.50
3. Lmax 57.50 50.40

CPCB Limits in dB(A) Leq ( Commercial Area)
During Day Time
(06:00 am to 10:00 pm)
During Night Time
(10:00 pm to 06:00 am)
65.00 55.00
Monitoring Methodology
A portable sound level meter with data logger is used to measure Ambient noise level and also
having inbuilt facilities to studydirect noise levels in dB (A). Continuous sound pressure level
were computed from the values of SPL measured with the help of noise meter. Noise
measurement was conducted as per IS: 4954 as adopted by CPCB. Collected data was used for
calculation of Leq, Lmax, Lmin, Lday, Lnight of the study area.
At monitoring location, continuous monitoring of noise was conducted for a period of 24 hours
to getLeq values at periodic time intervals. For every location, night and day time Leq values
have been estimated from the values of Leqfor which comparison could be made with the
national ambient noise standards.
As per the monitoring data result observed Leq- Day was 65.00 dB(A) and Leq – Night was
55.00 dB(A).
Figure 12: Noise monitoring data
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
parameters Leq Lmin. Lmax.
Series1

d) Soil Contamination:
 During Construction Phase:
Impacts: Top soil and inner soil will be excavated for the foundation of basements and pillars
of the proposed group housing colony “Urban Expression”.
Mitigation Measures: Top soil will be kept separately in a tarpaulin sheet and later on it will
be use for green belt development. The inner soil will be used for the leveling of the project
site. Hence, no movement of soil is anticipated outside the project premises.
 During Operation Phase:
Impact: Soil erosion during the rainy season from open areas of the proposed project.
Mitigation Measures: Green belt in and around the project will be developed to prevent the
soil erosion and rain water harvesting pits has been proposed for ground water recharge.
Result: The sample of the soil has been collected from the project location and analyzed.

Results of Soil Analysis
S.
No.
Parameter Result Method
1 . pH (25 0C) 8.4 IS : 2720 (P-26,1987)
2. Colour yellowish brown USDA
3. Moisture Content (%) 7.6 IS:14767,2000
4. Water holding capacity (gm/cc) 115.32 USDA
5. Chloride (mg/100gm) 42.24 USDA
6. Organic Matter (%) 0.75 IS:2720 (P-22, 1972)
7. Physical Appearance Sandy clay Loam ………….
8. Calcium, Meq/100g 1.45 USDA, Titration Method
9. Phasphate , Kg/hect. 6.2
IS10158-1982 Reaffirmed Aug
2009
10. Electrical conductivity 275 IS14767-2000 Reaffimed2006
μmhos/cm
11. Nitrogen as No3, Kg/hect 1.654 IS114684-1999 Reaffimed2008
12. Sulphate mg/g 1.8 IS2720 (Part28) 1977
13. Potassium,Kg/hect 28.51 USDA, Extraction Method
14. Sodium (mg/100gm) 4.02 USDA, Extraction Method
Sampling Result
The concentration of Organic matter in the soil is 0.75 % by mass. The Density of the soil
sample is 1.32 gm/cc. pH value is 8.4. Electrical Conductivity of the soil sample is observed to
be 275 μs/cm. Calcium (Ca) observed is 1.45 mg/kg.

4.4. Significance of the project
Increase in population in the country and rapid development in the Cities, specially the metro
cities resulting in large number of migration of population for employment opportunity in the
Cities. The project is located in a residential area and therefore no variations in demographic
structure are anticipated.
Construction phase: The existing demographic profile of the area will also be not impacted
because laborers engaged for construction will be from the local community.
Operation phase: Another area of attention is the changing demography in the area. At most
there will be slight spatial distribution of the local population and no significant influx of outside
population is anticipated.
Adverse effects on local communities:
Construction phase: There are no archeological monuments or important religious sites nearby
the project site. Therefore exists no potential risk of impact in this regard.However this will
definitely aid in providing employment to the set of unskilled, semi skilled and skilled labourers.
A few senior supervising positions will also be open to eligible local candidates.
Operation phase:At completion of this project it will provide with state of the art housing
society with all modern amenities.This in turn will also boost the local economy due to increased
commercialization.
The developments are mostly city centric and hence the influx of people leading to huge gap
between demand and supply of three main thing viz. water, energy and habitat. To cater the need
of the people with a state of art facility to live in comfort with luxury the proposed project is
planned.

Chapter-5
5. References
1. AP Pollution Control Board (2008-09), As per the provisions laid under EIA-2006
notification, prior Environmental Clearance (EC) is required.
http://www.appcb.ap.nic.in/ec/env_clear.htm
2. Bindu N. Lohani,J. Warren Evans , Robert R. Everitt, Harvey Ludwig, Richard A. Carpenter,
Shih-Liang Tu, “Environmental Impact Assessment for Developing Countries in Asia”,
Volume 1
3. Biswas, A.K. and QuGeping (1987) , “Environmental Impact Assessment for Developing
countries”, Tycooly International ,London. pp. 232.
4. Centre for Science & Environment issued the process for Environmental Clearance.
http://www.cseindia.org/node/403
5. Chen. Z and Heng. L ( 2004), An integrative methodology for environmental management in
construction.
6. Development and Environment Series 6, Environmental Law in Developing Countries,
Southeast and East Asia" (1994). Institute of Developing Economics.
7. Dutta. A.B. and Sengupta. I (5 Jan 2014) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and
Construction. http://www.isca.in/IJENS/Archive/v3/i1/11.ISCA-IRJEvS-2013-226.pdf
8. Designing Buildings (17 May 2014), for The Town and Country Planning (Environmental
Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999.
http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Environmental_impact_assessment
9. Ebisemiju, F., “Environmental impact assessment: making it work in developing countries”,
Journal of Environmental Management.
10. Environmental Impact Assessment Report Of Central Secretariat – Badarpur Corridor.
11. Gutman. P. EIA of urban projects in developing countries: challenge, experience,
suggestions.
http://www.hardystevenson.com/Articles/EIA%20OF%20URBAN%20PROJECTS%20IN%20DEVELOPI
NG%20COUNTRIES%20CHALLENGE,%20EXPERIENCE,%20SUGGESTIONS.pdf
12. Ghasemain. M and Poursafa.P ( 2012), Environmental Impact Assessment of the Industrial
Estate Development Plan with the Geographical Information System and Matrix Methods.

13. Geoffrey Wands Forde-Smith, Environmental Impact Assessment, Entrepreneurship,and
Policy Change, in POLICY THROUGH IMPACT ASSESSMENT: INSTITUTIONALIZED
ANALYSIS AS A POLICY STRATEGY 155, 165 (Robert V. Bartlett ed., 1989).
14. Jennifer C.Li. (2008), Environmental Impact Assessments in Developing Countries: An
Opportunity for Greater Environmental Security.
http://research.fit.edu/sealevelriselibrary/documents/doc_mgr/470/Global_EIAs_in_Developing_Co
untries_-_Li_2008.pdf
15. Kevin F.R. Decision-support for environmental impact assessment: A hybrid approach using
fuzzy logic and fuzzy analytic network process, Expert System with Application, Volume 36,
Issue 3, Part 1.
16. Magsi. H and Torre. A (2013), The Effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessment on
Infrastructural Development Projects: Case of Chotiari Reservoir in Sindh, Pakistan.
17. Modi. A and Shinkar. N.P. ( 2012), Environmental Impact Assessment of Road from Ujjain
to Jaora.
18. Muraleedharan, V. et.al., “Evaluation of EIA procedures in India. Impact Assessment” ,EIA
vol. 12, pp. 75-88.
19. Road Development Projects, Madhya Pradesh State. http://www.mprdc.com
20. Ross, W.A., “Environmental impact assessment in the Philippines: progress, problems, and
directions for the future.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 14: 217-232.
21. Road Development Projects, Madhya Pradesh State. http://www.mprdc.nic.com/ 03/02/2011.
22. Rau &Woofes, “ Environmental Impact Assessment”.
23. Shri S.C. Padhee ,”Rapid Environmental Impact Assessment And Environmental
Management Plan”, Gurubeda Iron Ore Mines (Over 49.776 Ha, Vill. Gurubeda, Keonjhar)
24. The Gazette of India (2006), The Ministry of Environment & Forests (MoEF) Government of
India has issued EIA Notification. http://envfor.nic.in/legis/eia/so1533.pdf
25. Wang. M.S and Huang.G.L (1993), Environmental impact assessments for major
construction projects in Taiwan: problems and solutions.
26. Wang.Y and Morgan.R.K. ( 2003), Environmental impact assessment of projects in the
People’s Republic of China: new law, old problems.
27. W.F.Canter, “Environmental Impact Assessment”. McGraw Hill Publications, 1977.
28. WOOD, supra note 1, at 221–39. 192. Lynton K. Caldwell, Understanding Impact Analysis:
Technical Process, Administrative Reform, Policy Principle, in POLICY THROUGH

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: INSTITUTIONALIZED ANALYSIS AS A POLICY
STRATEGY 7, 12 (Robert V. Bartlett ed., 1989).
29. Xiaodong Li and Yimin Zhu (2009), An LCA-based environmental impact assessment model
for construction processes.
30. Zhao. Y ( 2006), Assessing the Environmental Impact of Projects: A Critique of the EIA
Legal Regime in China.
******

EIA Report

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Ähnlich wie EIA Report

Ähnlich wie EIA Report (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

EIA Report