SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 24
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Model Answers for

Business Statistics




THIRD LEVEL
Series 2 2002
(Code 3009)




LCCI Examinations Board    ASP M 1140

                          >f0t@WJY2[2`EdEW4#
Business Statistics Third Level
Series 2 2002




                                     How to use this booklet

Model Answers have been developed by LCCIEB to offer additional information and guidance to
Centres, teachers and candidates as they prepare for LCCIEB examinations. The contents of this
booklet are divided into 3 elements:

(1)   Questions                  – reproduced from the printed examination paper

(2)   Model Answers              – summary of the main points that the Chief Examiner expected to
                                   see in the answers to each question in the examination paper,
                                   plus a fully worked example or sample answer (where applicable)

(3)   Helpful Hints              – where appropriate, additional guidance relating to individual
                                   questions or to examination technique

Teachers and candidates should find this booklet an invaluable teaching tool and an aid to success.

The London Chamber of Commerce and Industry Examinations Board provides Model Answers to help
candidates gain a general understanding of the standard required. The Board accepts that candidates
may offer other answers that could be equally valid.




                                          © LCCI CET 2002

All rights reserved; no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise
without prior written permission of the Publisher. The book may not be lent, resold, hired out or
otherwise disposed of by way of trade in any form of binding or cover, other than that in which it is
published, without the prior consent of the Publisher.

Typeset, printed and bound by the London Chamber of Commerce and Industry Examinations Board.




                                                  1
2
Business Statistics Third Level
Series 2 2002
QUESTION 1

In the year 2000 a random sample of 96 small companies revealed the following profits and losses
distribution:

              Profits and Losses (£000)          Number of
                                                 companies
              -50 up to 0                           10
               0 and up to 10                       12
              10 and up to 20                       21
              20 and up to 40                       26
              40 and up to 80                       19
              80 and up to 150                       8

(a) Calculate the arithmetic mean and the standard deviation of these company profits and losses.
                                                                                           (8 marks)

In the previous year a random sample of 150 small companies showed a mean profit of £28,400 with a
standard deviation of £28,352.

(b) Test to see if there has been a significant increase in the average profit made by small
    companies.
                                                                                               (7 marks)

(c) Calculate a 99% confidence interval for the arithmetic mean in the year 2000.
                                                                                               (5 marks)

                                                                                      (Total 20 marks)




                                                   3
Model Answer to Question 1


(a)
                                                                                             2
                                                f       mid pt                 fx        fx
 –50 up to 0                                   10         –25              –250       6,250
 Over 0 and up to 10                           12            5                60        300
 Over 10 and up to 20                          21          15                315      4,725
 Over 20 and up to 40                          26          30                780     23,400
 Over 40 and up to 80                          19          60              1,140     68,400
 Over 80 and up to 150                          8         115                920    105,800
                                               96                          2,965    208,875
                                               åf                          å fx     å fx 2


      x= åx                       x = 2,965     = £30.89 (000) (£30,885)
          åf                            96


              2 æ       ö
                            2                                2
      s = å fx – ç å fx ÷
                 çåf ÷
                                   s=    208,875 æ 2,965 ö
                                                –ç       ÷
           åf è         ø                  96    è 96 ø


      =   2,175.78 – 953.91 = 1,221.87 = £34.96 (000) (£34,955)



(b) Null hypothesis:              There has not been an increase in the average level
                                  of profits

      Alternative hypothesis: There has been an increase in the average level
                              of profits

      Critical z for 0.05 significance level I tail test 1.64

                                30.89 – 28.4              2.49
      z = x1 – x2   =                                             = 0.59
          s12 + s22         34.962 28.3522                18.09
                                  +
          n1 n2               96     150

      Alternative answer: 0.58

      Conclusions:                Accept the null hypothesis, there is insufficient
                                  evidence to claim the average level of profits has
                                  increased.


                      σ                      34.955
(c)   ci = x ± 2.58       = 30.89 ± 2.58
                      n                         96

      = 30.89 ± 2.58 x 3.57 = 30.89 ± 9.21

      = £21.68 to £40.1 (000)




                                                         4
QUESTION 2

The price of the standard family saloon car and the company market share was recorded for a random
sample of 12 car manufacturers.

      Selling       137     138     125     142     168    145     135     145     160   146   136   160
      price £00
      Market         14      15      10       8       9      7       11      5      3     5     7      2
      share %

(a) Plot the data on a scatter diagram and comment.
                                                                                                 (4 marks)

(b) Calculate the product-moment correlation coefficient.
                                                                                               (10 marks)

(c) Test to find if the correlation coefficient differs significantly from zero.
                                                                                                 (6 marks)

                                                                                          (Total 20 marks)




                                                       5
Model Answer to Question 2


(a)                                            Price and Market Share

                 16

                 14

                 12
Market Share %




                 10
                                                                                                  Series 1
                  8

                  6

                  4

                  2

                  0
                 12,000    13,000          14,000         15,000       16,000   17,000   18,000
                                                Price £
                                 Comment : Some weak negative relationship.

                            137                   14            18,769          196        1,918
                            138                   15            19,044          225        2,070
                            125                   10            15,625          100        1,250
                            142                    8            20,164           64        1,136
                            168                    9            28,224           81        1,512
                            145                    7            21,025           49        1,015
                            135                   11            18,225          121        1,485
                            145                    5            21,025           25          725
                            160                    3            25,600            9          480
                            146                    5            21,316           25          730
                            136                    7            18,496           49          952
                            160                    2            25,600            4          320
                          1,737                   96           253,113          948       13,593
                            åx                   åy                 å x2        å y2        å xy



(b)              r=            n å xy – (å x ) (å y )
                      æ n å x 2 – (å x )2 ö æ n å y 2 – (å y )2 ö
                      ç                   ÷ç                    ÷
                      è                   øè                    ø

                                12 x 13,593 – 1,737 x 96
                 r=
                      (12 x 253,113 – 1,737 2 )(12 x 948 – 96 2 )
                                   163,116 – 166,752
                 r=
                      (3,037,356 – 3,017,169 )(11,376 – 9,216 )
                           –3,636
                 r=                          = – 0.5506
                      (20,187 )(2,160 )




                                                                           6             CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE
Model Answer to Question 2 continued


(c) Null hypothesis:        The correlation coefficient does not differ from zero.
    Alternative hypothesis: The correlation coefficient does differ from zero.

    Degree of freedom        = n – 2 = 12 – 2 = 10
    Critical t0.025 = 2.23

         r n–2                     – 0.55 12 – 2
    t=                       t=
          1– r2                     1– ( −0.552 )


                                     –1.61
                             t=
                                    1– 0.3025

                                   –1.61
                               =
                                   0.835

                               = –2.086

    Conclusions:             The calculated value of t is less than the critical
                             value of t. There is insufficient evidence to reject the null
                             hypothesis.
                             The correlation coefficient does not differ from zero.




                                                     7
QUESTION 3

A company is planning the launch of a new product. It estimates the probability of good market
conditions to be 80%. If market conditions are good the probability of a successful launch is 75%, if
market conditions are poor the probability of a successful launch is 50%.

(a) Find the probability that the launch is successful.
                                                                                                 (5 marks)

(b) If the product launch is unsuccessful what is the probability that the market conditions were poor?
                                                                                               (6 marks)
The estimated returns from the new product launch are:

Market conditions are good and the product launch is successful                    £55 million
Market conditions are good and the product launch is unsuccessful                – £13 million
Market conditions are poor and the product launch is successful                    £37 million
Market conditions are poor and the product launch is unsuccessful                – £19 million

(c) What is the expected profit from the new product launch?
                                                                                                 (4 marks)

The company sells an established product that has variable levels of weekly sales with arithmetic
mean of £5,000 and standard deviation of £600. You may assume that the sales are normally
distributed.

(d) (i)   Find the probability that in one week there are sales of over £6,500

    (ii) The sales have to exceed £3,800 in each week for the product to break even, what is the
         probability of this happening?
                                                                                            (5 marks)

                                                                                         (Total 20 marks)




                                                    8
Model Answer to Question 3


(a) Good market conditions and successful = 0.8 x 0.75 = 0.6
    Poor market conditions and successful = 0.2 x 0.5 = 0.1

    Probability of successful launch                = 0.7
    Accept decision tree


(b) Good and unsuccessful                           = 0.8 x 0.25 = 0.2
    Poor and unsuccessful                           = 0.2 x 0.5 = 0.1

    Probability unsuccessful                        = 0.3

      Poor and unsuccessf ul         0.1
                                 =         = 0.33
     Probability unsuccessf ul       0.3


(c) Expected return

    Good market conditions and successful launch 0.8 x 0.75 x £55m       = £33m

    Good market conditions and unsuccessful launch 0.8 x 0.25 x –£13m = -£2.6m

    Poor market conditions and successful launch 0.2 x 0.5 x £37m        = £3.7m

    Poor market conditions and unsuccessful launch 0.2 x 0.5 – £19m      = –£1.9m
                                                                          £32.2m



(d) (i)    z = x–µ              z=   6,500 – 5,000
                                                   =
                                                     1,500
                sd                       600          600

           = 2.5, prop = 1 – 0.994 = 0.006

    (ii)   z = x–µ              z=   3,800 – 5,000
                                                   =
                                                     1,200
                                                           = 2
                sd                       600          600

           Proportion = 0.977




                                                            9
QUESTION 4

(a) What are the benefits of an effective quality control system?
                                                                                                 (4 marks)

A company in its quality control procedures sets the warning limit at the 0.025 probability point and the
action limit at the 0.001 probability point. This means for example that the upper action line is set so
that the probability of the mean exceeding the line is 0.001.

The internal diameter of a bored hole is set at 35 mm with a known standard deviation of 0.1 mm.
Random samples of 9 items at a time are taken from the production line to check the accuracy of the
manufacturing process.

(b) (i)    Construct a quality control chart to monitor the manufacturing process.
                                                                                                 (8 marks)

    (ii)   The results for 8 samples are given below. Plot these on your quality control chart and
           comment on the graph.
                                                                                                (4 marks)

      Sample number             1        2         3         4        5         6         7          8
      Sample mean (mm)         35.05    34.94     34.89     35.16    35.15    34.95      34.99    35.08

(c) If the process mean changed to 35.02 mm and the standard deviation remained at
    0.1 mm calculate the probability that the mean of a random sample of 9 components would be
    outside the warning limits.
                                                                                         (4 marks)

                                                                                        (Total 20 marks)




                                                   10
Model Answer to Question 4


(a) The benefits of a good quality control system are better quality products,
    fewer rejects and less waste, better customer relations, more sales

      Warning limits =      x ± 1.96 σ    = 35 ± 1.96
                                                        0 .1
                                                                = 35 ± 1.96 x 0.033
                                      n                     9


           upper w lts              35.06                 35.07(2)
           lower w lts              34.94                 34.93(2)

      Action limits =    x ± 3.09 σ    = 35 ± 3.09
                                                     0 .1
                                                            = 35 ± 3.09 x 0.033
                                   n                  9


           upper act lts            35.10
           lower act lts            34.90


(b)                                 Quality Control Chart




      The process goes out of control twice. It seems unstable.

(c)   z = x–µ    =
                     35.02 – 35.07
                          0.1
                                   =
                                      0.05
                                           = 1.5
           sd                        0.033
                            9


      Probability the mean lies outside the upper warning limit = 0.067

      34.93 – 35.02
                    = 2 .7
           0 .1
             9

      Probability the mean lies outside the lower warning limit = 0.004

      Total probability = 0.071 or (0.072 if 0.0333 is used)




                                                                       11
QUESTION 5

(a) In what circumstances is a significance test based on the ‘t’ distribution used in preference to a
    significance test based on the normal distribution?
                                                                                                (4 marks)

Data input clerks are sent on an intensive training course to increase their keyboarding speed. The
results of a before and after test for a random sample of 10 clerks gave the following results. Speed is
measured in key depressions per minute (kdp).

      Clerk                a        b       c       d       e       f       g       h        i         j
      Before training
      course (kdp)        625     598     685     754     658     690     559      840      758      685

      After training
      course (kdp)        610     620     690     780     690     702     573      851      744      690


(b) Test whether the training course has increased the clerks’ data input speed.
                                                                                                 (12 marks)

(c) What is meant by a Type I and a Type II error?
                                                                                                  (4 marks)

                                                                                         (Total 20 marks)




                                                   12
Model Answer to Question 5


(a) The ‘t’ distribution is used when n the sample size is small <30 and the
    standard deviation is estimated from the sample.


(b) Null hypothesis:         The course has not increased the speed of the
                             data input clerks
     Alternative hypothesis: The course has increased the speed of the
                             data input clerks

     Degree of freedom n – 1 10 – 1 = 9
     Critical t0.05 value = 1.83


               625             610                  –15            225                615.04
               598             620                   22            484                148.84
               685             690                    5             25                 23.04
               754             780                   26            676                262.44
               658             690                   32          1,024                492.84
               690             702                   12            144                  4.84
               559             573                   14            196                 17.64
               840             851                   11            121                  1.44
               758             744                  –14            196                566.44
               685             690                    5             25                 23.04
                                                     98          3,116              2,155.60
                                                                                                2
                                                     åd            å d2            å æd – d ö
                                                                                     ç      ÷
                                                                                     è      ø


                                         æ
                                       å çd – d ÷
                                         ç      ÷
                                                     ö2
                                                               å d2 –
                                                                         (å d )2
     d = åd   =
                  98
                     = 9 .8   sed =      è           ø                     n
          n       10                         n –1                  n –1

                                                                       982
                                                               3,116 –
         2,155.8                                                        10
     =           =    239.53 = 15.48                or
          10 – 1                                                  10 – 1



                                                                         If a two sample means
     t = d –0 =    9.8 – 0
                   15.48
                           =
                             9 .8
                                  =2                                     test is used can score
          sed                4 .9
                                                                         5: nh/ah, conclusions
                      10

     Conclusions:             The calculated value of ‘t’ is greater than critical value
                              of ‘t’ reject the Null Hypothesis the speed of the data input
                              clerks has increased


(c) A Type I error is the error of rejecting a null hypothesis that is true and
    a Type II error is the error of accepting a false null hypothesis which
    should be rejected.




                                                          13
QUESTION 6

(a) (i)    What is meant by the standard error of the mean?                                  (4 marks)

    (ii)   What is the difference between a one and two tail test?                           (4 marks)

In September 2001, a Travel Agent used a random sample of 36 holiday makers to find out the
average cost per person of a one week holiday in Ruritania. The following information was found:

                                         September 2001

    Mean                                 £372.40
    Standard deviation                   £26.10
    Sample size                          36

In the previous year the average cost of each holiday was £356.20.

(b) Test whether the cost of a one week holiday to Ruritania has increased significantly since the
    previous year.
                                                                                              (6 marks)

The company based its views on customer satisfaction from the letters it receives. In the previous
year, 68% of the letters it received were of a positive nature.

(c) The company wishes to adopt a more scientific approach to estimating customer satisfaction.
    What sample size would be needed to estimate the proportion of customers’ views to within 2% of
    the true figure at the 95% confidence level?
                                                                                          (6 marks)

                                                                                     (Total 20 marks)




                                                   14
Model Answer to Question 6


(a) (i)      The standard error of the mean is the measure of dispersion of the
             sample means. It equals
                                                 σ
                                                 n

      (ii)   A one tail test tests the direction of the difference between two statistics.
             A two tail test tests if there is a difference between the two statistics without
             regard to the direction.


(b) Null hypothesis:          There is no difference in the holiday cost between
                              last year and September
      Alternative hypothesis: There is an increase in the holiday cost between
                              last year and September

      Critical z value = 1.64

      z = x –µ =            372.4 – 356.2
                                             =
                                                     16.2
                                                            = 3.72
          σ/ n               26.1 / 36               4.35

      Conclusions:                    The calculated value of z is greater than the critical value
                                      of z. Reject the null hypothesis. There is evidence to suggest
                                      that the holiday cost has increased significantly.


                  0.02                      0.02
(c)   ± 1.96 >                 ± 1.96 >
                 p(1 – p)                 0.68 x 0.32
                    n                            n



             2      0.022                        0.0004            3.8416 x 0.2176
      1.96 >                       3.8416 >                   n>                   > 2,089.8
                 0.68 x 0.32                     0.2176                0.0004
                        n                             n
      n = 2,090




                                                                   15
QUESTION 7

(a) In what circumstances is the multiplicative model preferable to the additive model in time series
    calculations?
                                                                                              (4 marks)
The table below shows the quarterly sales figures for a company:

                      Quarter 1           Quarter 2          Quarter 3          Quarter 4
        1998              48                 56                  70                 96
        1999              64                 76                  86                132
        2000              72                100                108                 188

(b) By the method of centred moving averages, calculate the trend values for the time series and plot
    the trend on a graph.
                                                                                           (10 marks)

The average seasonal components calculated by the multiplicative method are shown below:

    Quarter 1           Quarter 2          Quarter 3          Quarter 4
    0.768               0.903              0.980              1.349

(c) Using the average seasonal components provided above and the original sales figures, calculate
    the seasonally adjusted sales and plot the results on the graph constructed for part (b). Comment
    on your results.
                                                                                              (6 marks)

                                                                                     (Total 20 marks)




                                                  16
Model Answer to Question 7


(a) The multiplicative model is preferable when the data has a strong trend with the
    differences between the trend and the original data values varying proportionally to
    the trend values rather than absolutely.


(b)




(c) Qtr       Sales        Total          m avg 1           m avg 2
                                                            Trend
       1        48
       2        56
       3        70         270              67.5              69.5
       4        96         286              71.5              74
       5        64         306              76.5              78.5
       6        76         322              80.5              85
       7        86         358              89.5              90.5
       8       132         366              91.5              94.5
       9        72         390              97.5             100.25
      10       100         412             103               110
      11       108         468             117
      12       188




                                                    17                  CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE
Model Answer to Question 7 continued



           Sales           Seasonal adjustment        Seasonal Adjusted Sales
            48                  0.768                           62.50
            56                  0.902                           62.08
            70                  0.980                           71.43
            96                  1.349                           71.16
            64                  0.768                           83.33
            76                  0.902                           84.26
            86                  0.980                           87.76
           132                  1.349                           97.85
            72                  0.768                           93.75
           100                  0.902                          110.86
           108                  0.980                          110.20
           188                  1.349                          139.36


    Comment:   The trend and seasonally adjusted data values show little difference.
               This implies there is no change in the underlying trend.




                                               18
QUESTION 8

(a) When might a χ2 test be used?
                                                                                            (4 marks)

From its records, a company analyses its sales by size and region. The table below shows the results:

                                                            Size of order
      Region               £0 and up to       £1,000 and up         £3,000 and up     £10,000 and
                              £1,000            to £3,000             to £10,000         over
      Northern                   40                    33                   20             15
      Midlands                   50                    45                   40             25
      Southern                   40                    32                   40             20

(b) Test whether there is a relationship between size of order and region.
                                                                                          (12 marks)

(c) Combining the three regions estimate a 99% confidence interval for the proportion of orders that
    are valued at less than £1,000.
                                                                                            (4 marks)

                                                                                    (Total 20 marks)




                                                  19
Model Answer to Question 8


(a) The Chi-squared test is used to test for association between characteristics
    rather than variables, for randomness or changes in proportions.


(b)

      Null hypothesis:        There is no association between the size of order
                              and region
      Alternative hypothesis: There is association between the size of order
                              and region

      Degrees of freedom = (4 – 1)(3 – 1) = 6

      Critical   χ2 = 12.59

                              <£1,000    £1,000<3,000        £3,000<10,000          £10,000+
       Region                     40                33                  20               15
                                  50                45                  40               25
                                  40                32                  40               20
       Total                     130               110                 100               60

       expected freq            35.1              29.7                 27.0             16.2
                                52.0              44.0                 40.0             24.0
                                42.9              36.3                 33.0             19.8

       contribution            0.684             0.367               1.815             0.089
       to chi                  0.077             0.023               0.000             0.042
                               0.196             0.509               1.485             0.002
                               5.288

                      2
      χ = å (O – E ) = 5.288
               E

      Conclusions:               The calculated χ2 is less than the critical χ2 . There
                                 is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
                                 There is no association between the size of order
                                 and region.


(c)

      99% confidence z = ± 2.58

      p = 130/400 = 0.325, (1 – p) = 0.675

      ci = p ± 2.58 p(1 – p ) / n        = 0.325 ± 2.58       0.325 x 0.675 / 400

      = 0.325 ± 2.58 x 0.0234 = 0.325 ± 0.0604

      0.265 to 0.385




                                                        20
21   © LCCI CET 2002
Education Development International plc
The Old School Holly Walk Leamington Spa Warwickshire CV32 4GL United Kingdom
          Customer Service: +44 (0) 8707 202 909 Fax: +44 (0) 1926 887676
                        Email: customerservice@ediplc.com

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

84427907 cost-accounting-series-2-2004 code-3016
84427907 cost-accounting-series-2-2004 code-301684427907 cost-accounting-series-2-2004 code-3016
84427907 cost-accounting-series-2-2004 code-3016
priya5594
 
47246781 2006-lcci-level-3-series-2 answer
47246781 2006-lcci-level-3-series-2 answer47246781 2006-lcci-level-3-series-2 answer
47246781 2006-lcci-level-3-series-2 answer
pxqlxj
 
55184784 cost-accounting-l3-s3
55184784 cost-accounting-l3-s355184784 cost-accounting-l3-s3
55184784 cost-accounting-l3-s3
priya5594
 
96128834 business-statistics-series-3-2010-code3009
96128834 business-statistics-series-3-2010-code300996128834 business-statistics-series-3-2010-code3009
96128834 business-statistics-series-3-2010-code3009
priya5594
 
Passport to success solutions level 1 book keeping
Passport to success solutions level 1 book keepingPassport to success solutions level 1 book keeping
Passport to success solutions level 1 book keeping
thuhakt
 
Executive Summary Case 4 Melford
Executive Summary  Case 4 MelfordExecutive Summary  Case 4 Melford
Executive Summary Case 4 Melford
UCFPMBA
 
Melford Written Analysis
Melford Written AnalysisMelford Written Analysis
Melford Written Analysis
UCFPMBA
 
Chapter 03rata de interes
Chapter 03rata de interesChapter 03rata de interes
Chapter 03rata de interes
federicoblanco
 
YCL's FROI Approach for valuing the cost savings from support for troubled fa...
YCL's FROI Approach for valuing the cost savings from support for troubled fa...YCL's FROI Approach for valuing the cost savings from support for troubled fa...
YCL's FROI Approach for valuing the cost savings from support for troubled fa...
YorkConsultingLLP
 
Managerial Accounting Project - Budgeting
Managerial Accounting Project - BudgetingManagerial Accounting Project - Budgeting
Managerial Accounting Project - Budgeting
davisdemers
 
Chapter 15financiaciòn
Chapter 15financiaciònChapter 15financiaciòn
Chapter 15financiaciòn
federicoblanco
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

84427907 cost-accounting-series-2-2004 code-3016
84427907 cost-accounting-series-2-2004 code-301684427907 cost-accounting-series-2-2004 code-3016
84427907 cost-accounting-series-2-2004 code-3016
 
47246781 2006-lcci-level-3-series-2 answer
47246781 2006-lcci-level-3-series-2 answer47246781 2006-lcci-level-3-series-2 answer
47246781 2006-lcci-level-3-series-2 answer
 
55184784 cost-accounting-l3-s3
55184784 cost-accounting-l3-s355184784 cost-accounting-l3-s3
55184784 cost-accounting-l3-s3
 
96128834 business-statistics-series-3-2010-code3009
96128834 business-statistics-series-3-2010-code300996128834 business-statistics-series-3-2010-code3009
96128834 business-statistics-series-3-2010-code3009
 
Passport to success solutions level 1 book keeping
Passport to success solutions level 1 book keepingPassport to success solutions level 1 book keeping
Passport to success solutions level 1 book keeping
 
Executive Summary Case 4 Melford
Executive Summary  Case 4 MelfordExecutive Summary  Case 4 Melford
Executive Summary Case 4 Melford
 
05210202 Fluid Mechanics And Hydraulic Machinery
05210202 Fluid Mechanics  And  Hydraulic Machinery05210202 Fluid Mechanics  And  Hydraulic Machinery
05210202 Fluid Mechanics And Hydraulic Machinery
 
Melford Written Analysis
Melford Written AnalysisMelford Written Analysis
Melford Written Analysis
 
Venture financeproject1
Venture financeproject1Venture financeproject1
Venture financeproject1
 
Chapter 03rata de interes
Chapter 03rata de interesChapter 03rata de interes
Chapter 03rata de interes
 
AnswersCWA-FR-2012
AnswersCWA-FR-2012AnswersCWA-FR-2012
AnswersCWA-FR-2012
 
YCL's FROI Approach for valuing the cost savings from support for troubled fa...
YCL's FROI Approach for valuing the cost savings from support for troubled fa...YCL's FROI Approach for valuing the cost savings from support for troubled fa...
YCL's FROI Approach for valuing the cost savings from support for troubled fa...
 
Chapter03 mc guigan
Chapter03 mc guiganChapter03 mc guigan
Chapter03 mc guigan
 
Managerial Accounting Project - Budgeting
Managerial Accounting Project - BudgetingManagerial Accounting Project - Budgeting
Managerial Accounting Project - Budgeting
 
Cost & fm
Cost & fmCost & fm
Cost & fm
 
Management Accounting Assignment Help
Management Accounting Assignment HelpManagement Accounting Assignment Help
Management Accounting Assignment Help
 
Engineering economy 8th edition blank solutions manual
Engineering economy 8th edition blank solutions manualEngineering economy 8th edition blank solutions manual
Engineering economy 8th edition blank solutions manual
 
Acc topic 5
Acc   topic 5Acc   topic 5
Acc topic 5
 
Acc topic 4
Acc   topic 4Acc   topic 4
Acc topic 4
 
Chapter 15financiaciòn
Chapter 15financiaciònChapter 15financiaciòn
Chapter 15financiaciòn
 

Ähnlich wie Lcci business statistics series 2 2002 考试

Teoría y problemas de descuentos sucesivos DS35 ccesa007
Teoría y problemas de descuentos sucesivos DS35 ccesa007Teoría y problemas de descuentos sucesivos DS35 ccesa007
Teoría y problemas de descuentos sucesivos DS35 ccesa007
Demetrio Ccesa Rayme
 
212255 ama-sn- 2010(final)
212255 ama-sn- 2010(final)212255 ama-sn- 2010(final)
212255 ama-sn- 2010(final)
Ashok Prasad
 
Alg II Unit 3-4-linear programingintro
Alg II Unit 3-4-linear programingintroAlg II Unit 3-4-linear programingintro
Alg II Unit 3-4-linear programingintro
jtentinger
 
Tools for Business Decisions - Exercises 3
Tools for Business Decisions - Exercises 3Tools for Business Decisions - Exercises 3
Tools for Business Decisions - Exercises 3
Kari Silvennoinen
 

Ähnlich wie Lcci business statistics series 2 2002 考试 (20)

Optimización de recursos en la confección de overoles
Optimización de recursos en la confección de overolesOptimización de recursos en la confección de overoles
Optimización de recursos en la confección de overoles
 
Zimbabwe School Examinations Council Zimbabwe Ordinary Level Marking Scheme N...
Zimbabwe School Examinations Council Zimbabwe Ordinary Level Marking Scheme N...Zimbabwe School Examinations Council Zimbabwe Ordinary Level Marking Scheme N...
Zimbabwe School Examinations Council Zimbabwe Ordinary Level Marking Scheme N...
 
Coefficient of variation
Coefficient of variationCoefficient of variation
Coefficient of variation
 
Chapter 17
Chapter 17Chapter 17
Chapter 17
 
managerial_Economics_supportive_material.docx
managerial_Economics_supportive_material.docxmanagerial_Economics_supportive_material.docx
managerial_Economics_supportive_material.docx
 
Ch 9-measures-of-central-tendency-practics-quesitons-for-pipfa
Ch 9-measures-of-central-tendency-practics-quesitons-for-pipfaCh 9-measures-of-central-tendency-practics-quesitons-for-pipfa
Ch 9-measures-of-central-tendency-practics-quesitons-for-pipfa
 
Algebra and Trigonometry 9th Edition Larson Solutions Manual
Algebra and Trigonometry 9th Edition Larson Solutions ManualAlgebra and Trigonometry 9th Edition Larson Solutions Manual
Algebra and Trigonometry 9th Edition Larson Solutions Manual
 
IIT JAM EN - Economics 2022 Question Paper | Sourav Sir's Classes
IIT JAM EN - Economics 2022 Question Paper | Sourav Sir's ClassesIIT JAM EN - Economics 2022 Question Paper | Sourav Sir's Classes
IIT JAM EN - Economics 2022 Question Paper | Sourav Sir's Classes
 
Breakeven Analysis (Introduction)
Breakeven Analysis (Introduction)Breakeven Analysis (Introduction)
Breakeven Analysis (Introduction)
 
Teoría y problemas de descuentos sucesivos DS35 ccesa007
Teoría y problemas de descuentos sucesivos DS35 ccesa007Teoría y problemas de descuentos sucesivos DS35 ccesa007
Teoría y problemas de descuentos sucesivos DS35 ccesa007
 
212255 ama-sn- 2010(final)
212255 ama-sn- 2010(final)212255 ama-sn- 2010(final)
212255 ama-sn- 2010(final)
 
Aplicaciones de la derivada en la Carrera de Contabilidad y Auditoría
Aplicaciones de la derivada en la Carrera de Contabilidad y AuditoríaAplicaciones de la derivada en la Carrera de Contabilidad y Auditoría
Aplicaciones de la derivada en la Carrera de Contabilidad y Auditoría
 
Inventory probs-solns-s07
Inventory probs-solns-s07Inventory probs-solns-s07
Inventory probs-solns-s07
 
Alg II Unit 3-4-linear programingintro
Alg II Unit 3-4-linear programingintroAlg II Unit 3-4-linear programingintro
Alg II Unit 3-4-linear programingintro
 
Tools for Business Decisions - Exercises 3
Tools for Business Decisions - Exercises 3Tools for Business Decisions - Exercises 3
Tools for Business Decisions - Exercises 3
 
Chapter 16
Chapter 16Chapter 16
Chapter 16
 
Barkha gupta 010012_mms.docx
Barkha gupta 010012_mms.docxBarkha gupta 010012_mms.docx
Barkha gupta 010012_mms.docx
 
Linear programming
Linear programmingLinear programming
Linear programming
 
Linear programming problems
Linear programming problemsLinear programming problems
Linear programming problems
 
Terminado matematica ii
Terminado matematica iiTerminado matematica ii
Terminado matematica ii
 

Lcci business statistics series 2 2002 考试

  • 1. Model Answers for Business Statistics THIRD LEVEL Series 2 2002 (Code 3009) LCCI Examinations Board ASP M 1140 >f0t@WJY2[2`EdEW4#
  • 2.
  • 3. Business Statistics Third Level Series 2 2002 How to use this booklet Model Answers have been developed by LCCIEB to offer additional information and guidance to Centres, teachers and candidates as they prepare for LCCIEB examinations. The contents of this booklet are divided into 3 elements: (1) Questions – reproduced from the printed examination paper (2) Model Answers – summary of the main points that the Chief Examiner expected to see in the answers to each question in the examination paper, plus a fully worked example or sample answer (where applicable) (3) Helpful Hints – where appropriate, additional guidance relating to individual questions or to examination technique Teachers and candidates should find this booklet an invaluable teaching tool and an aid to success. The London Chamber of Commerce and Industry Examinations Board provides Model Answers to help candidates gain a general understanding of the standard required. The Board accepts that candidates may offer other answers that could be equally valid. © LCCI CET 2002 All rights reserved; no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without prior written permission of the Publisher. The book may not be lent, resold, hired out or otherwise disposed of by way of trade in any form of binding or cover, other than that in which it is published, without the prior consent of the Publisher. Typeset, printed and bound by the London Chamber of Commerce and Industry Examinations Board. 1
  • 4. 2
  • 5. Business Statistics Third Level Series 2 2002 QUESTION 1 In the year 2000 a random sample of 96 small companies revealed the following profits and losses distribution: Profits and Losses (£000) Number of companies -50 up to 0 10 0 and up to 10 12 10 and up to 20 21 20 and up to 40 26 40 and up to 80 19 80 and up to 150 8 (a) Calculate the arithmetic mean and the standard deviation of these company profits and losses. (8 marks) In the previous year a random sample of 150 small companies showed a mean profit of £28,400 with a standard deviation of £28,352. (b) Test to see if there has been a significant increase in the average profit made by small companies. (7 marks) (c) Calculate a 99% confidence interval for the arithmetic mean in the year 2000. (5 marks) (Total 20 marks) 3
  • 6. Model Answer to Question 1 (a) 2 f mid pt fx fx –50 up to 0 10 –25 –250 6,250 Over 0 and up to 10 12 5 60 300 Over 10 and up to 20 21 15 315 4,725 Over 20 and up to 40 26 30 780 23,400 Over 40 and up to 80 19 60 1,140 68,400 Over 80 and up to 150 8 115 920 105,800 96 2,965 208,875 åf å fx å fx 2 x= åx x = 2,965 = £30.89 (000) (£30,885) åf 96 2 æ ö 2 2 s = å fx – ç å fx ÷ çåf ÷ s= 208,875 æ 2,965 ö –ç ÷ åf è ø 96 è 96 ø = 2,175.78 – 953.91 = 1,221.87 = £34.96 (000) (£34,955) (b) Null hypothesis: There has not been an increase in the average level of profits Alternative hypothesis: There has been an increase in the average level of profits Critical z for 0.05 significance level I tail test 1.64 30.89 – 28.4 2.49 z = x1 – x2 = = 0.59 s12 + s22 34.962 28.3522 18.09 + n1 n2 96 150 Alternative answer: 0.58 Conclusions: Accept the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence to claim the average level of profits has increased. σ 34.955 (c) ci = x ± 2.58 = 30.89 ± 2.58 n 96 = 30.89 ± 2.58 x 3.57 = 30.89 ± 9.21 = £21.68 to £40.1 (000) 4
  • 7. QUESTION 2 The price of the standard family saloon car and the company market share was recorded for a random sample of 12 car manufacturers. Selling 137 138 125 142 168 145 135 145 160 146 136 160 price £00 Market 14 15 10 8 9 7 11 5 3 5 7 2 share % (a) Plot the data on a scatter diagram and comment. (4 marks) (b) Calculate the product-moment correlation coefficient. (10 marks) (c) Test to find if the correlation coefficient differs significantly from zero. (6 marks) (Total 20 marks) 5
  • 8. Model Answer to Question 2 (a) Price and Market Share 16 14 12 Market Share % 10 Series 1 8 6 4 2 0 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 Price £ Comment : Some weak negative relationship. 137 14 18,769 196 1,918 138 15 19,044 225 2,070 125 10 15,625 100 1,250 142 8 20,164 64 1,136 168 9 28,224 81 1,512 145 7 21,025 49 1,015 135 11 18,225 121 1,485 145 5 21,025 25 725 160 3 25,600 9 480 146 5 21,316 25 730 136 7 18,496 49 952 160 2 25,600 4 320 1,737 96 253,113 948 13,593 åx åy å x2 å y2 å xy (b) r= n å xy – (å x ) (å y ) æ n å x 2 – (å x )2 ö æ n å y 2 – (å y )2 ö ç ÷ç ÷ è øè ø 12 x 13,593 – 1,737 x 96 r= (12 x 253,113 – 1,737 2 )(12 x 948 – 96 2 ) 163,116 – 166,752 r= (3,037,356 – 3,017,169 )(11,376 – 9,216 ) –3,636 r= = – 0.5506 (20,187 )(2,160 ) 6 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE
  • 9. Model Answer to Question 2 continued (c) Null hypothesis: The correlation coefficient does not differ from zero. Alternative hypothesis: The correlation coefficient does differ from zero. Degree of freedom = n – 2 = 12 – 2 = 10 Critical t0.025 = 2.23 r n–2 – 0.55 12 – 2 t= t= 1– r2 1– ( −0.552 ) –1.61 t= 1– 0.3025 –1.61 = 0.835 = –2.086 Conclusions: The calculated value of t is less than the critical value of t. There is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. The correlation coefficient does not differ from zero. 7
  • 10. QUESTION 3 A company is planning the launch of a new product. It estimates the probability of good market conditions to be 80%. If market conditions are good the probability of a successful launch is 75%, if market conditions are poor the probability of a successful launch is 50%. (a) Find the probability that the launch is successful. (5 marks) (b) If the product launch is unsuccessful what is the probability that the market conditions were poor? (6 marks) The estimated returns from the new product launch are: Market conditions are good and the product launch is successful £55 million Market conditions are good and the product launch is unsuccessful – £13 million Market conditions are poor and the product launch is successful £37 million Market conditions are poor and the product launch is unsuccessful – £19 million (c) What is the expected profit from the new product launch? (4 marks) The company sells an established product that has variable levels of weekly sales with arithmetic mean of £5,000 and standard deviation of £600. You may assume that the sales are normally distributed. (d) (i) Find the probability that in one week there are sales of over £6,500 (ii) The sales have to exceed £3,800 in each week for the product to break even, what is the probability of this happening? (5 marks) (Total 20 marks) 8
  • 11. Model Answer to Question 3 (a) Good market conditions and successful = 0.8 x 0.75 = 0.6 Poor market conditions and successful = 0.2 x 0.5 = 0.1 Probability of successful launch = 0.7 Accept decision tree (b) Good and unsuccessful = 0.8 x 0.25 = 0.2 Poor and unsuccessful = 0.2 x 0.5 = 0.1 Probability unsuccessful = 0.3 Poor and unsuccessf ul 0.1 = = 0.33 Probability unsuccessf ul 0.3 (c) Expected return Good market conditions and successful launch 0.8 x 0.75 x £55m = £33m Good market conditions and unsuccessful launch 0.8 x 0.25 x –£13m = -£2.6m Poor market conditions and successful launch 0.2 x 0.5 x £37m = £3.7m Poor market conditions and unsuccessful launch 0.2 x 0.5 – £19m = –£1.9m £32.2m (d) (i) z = x–µ z= 6,500 – 5,000 = 1,500 sd 600 600 = 2.5, prop = 1 – 0.994 = 0.006 (ii) z = x–µ z= 3,800 – 5,000 = 1,200 = 2 sd 600 600 Proportion = 0.977 9
  • 12. QUESTION 4 (a) What are the benefits of an effective quality control system? (4 marks) A company in its quality control procedures sets the warning limit at the 0.025 probability point and the action limit at the 0.001 probability point. This means for example that the upper action line is set so that the probability of the mean exceeding the line is 0.001. The internal diameter of a bored hole is set at 35 mm with a known standard deviation of 0.1 mm. Random samples of 9 items at a time are taken from the production line to check the accuracy of the manufacturing process. (b) (i) Construct a quality control chart to monitor the manufacturing process. (8 marks) (ii) The results for 8 samples are given below. Plot these on your quality control chart and comment on the graph. (4 marks) Sample number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Sample mean (mm) 35.05 34.94 34.89 35.16 35.15 34.95 34.99 35.08 (c) If the process mean changed to 35.02 mm and the standard deviation remained at 0.1 mm calculate the probability that the mean of a random sample of 9 components would be outside the warning limits. (4 marks) (Total 20 marks) 10
  • 13. Model Answer to Question 4 (a) The benefits of a good quality control system are better quality products, fewer rejects and less waste, better customer relations, more sales Warning limits = x ± 1.96 σ = 35 ± 1.96 0 .1 = 35 ± 1.96 x 0.033 n 9 upper w lts 35.06 35.07(2) lower w lts 34.94 34.93(2) Action limits = x ± 3.09 σ = 35 ± 3.09 0 .1 = 35 ± 3.09 x 0.033 n 9 upper act lts 35.10 lower act lts 34.90 (b) Quality Control Chart The process goes out of control twice. It seems unstable. (c) z = x–µ = 35.02 – 35.07 0.1 = 0.05 = 1.5 sd 0.033 9 Probability the mean lies outside the upper warning limit = 0.067 34.93 – 35.02 = 2 .7 0 .1 9 Probability the mean lies outside the lower warning limit = 0.004 Total probability = 0.071 or (0.072 if 0.0333 is used) 11
  • 14. QUESTION 5 (a) In what circumstances is a significance test based on the ‘t’ distribution used in preference to a significance test based on the normal distribution? (4 marks) Data input clerks are sent on an intensive training course to increase their keyboarding speed. The results of a before and after test for a random sample of 10 clerks gave the following results. Speed is measured in key depressions per minute (kdp). Clerk a b c d e f g h i j Before training course (kdp) 625 598 685 754 658 690 559 840 758 685 After training course (kdp) 610 620 690 780 690 702 573 851 744 690 (b) Test whether the training course has increased the clerks’ data input speed. (12 marks) (c) What is meant by a Type I and a Type II error? (4 marks) (Total 20 marks) 12
  • 15. Model Answer to Question 5 (a) The ‘t’ distribution is used when n the sample size is small <30 and the standard deviation is estimated from the sample. (b) Null hypothesis: The course has not increased the speed of the data input clerks Alternative hypothesis: The course has increased the speed of the data input clerks Degree of freedom n – 1 10 – 1 = 9 Critical t0.05 value = 1.83 625 610 –15 225 615.04 598 620 22 484 148.84 685 690 5 25 23.04 754 780 26 676 262.44 658 690 32 1,024 492.84 690 702 12 144 4.84 559 573 14 196 17.64 840 851 11 121 1.44 758 744 –14 196 566.44 685 690 5 25 23.04 98 3,116 2,155.60 2 åd å d2 å æd – d ö ç ÷ è ø æ å çd – d ÷ ç ÷ ö2 å d2 – (å d )2 d = åd = 98 = 9 .8 sed = è ø n n 10 n –1 n –1 982 3,116 – 2,155.8 10 = = 239.53 = 15.48 or 10 – 1 10 – 1 If a two sample means t = d –0 = 9.8 – 0 15.48 = 9 .8 =2 test is used can score sed 4 .9 5: nh/ah, conclusions 10 Conclusions: The calculated value of ‘t’ is greater than critical value of ‘t’ reject the Null Hypothesis the speed of the data input clerks has increased (c) A Type I error is the error of rejecting a null hypothesis that is true and a Type II error is the error of accepting a false null hypothesis which should be rejected. 13
  • 16. QUESTION 6 (a) (i) What is meant by the standard error of the mean? (4 marks) (ii) What is the difference between a one and two tail test? (4 marks) In September 2001, a Travel Agent used a random sample of 36 holiday makers to find out the average cost per person of a one week holiday in Ruritania. The following information was found: September 2001 Mean £372.40 Standard deviation £26.10 Sample size 36 In the previous year the average cost of each holiday was £356.20. (b) Test whether the cost of a one week holiday to Ruritania has increased significantly since the previous year. (6 marks) The company based its views on customer satisfaction from the letters it receives. In the previous year, 68% of the letters it received were of a positive nature. (c) The company wishes to adopt a more scientific approach to estimating customer satisfaction. What sample size would be needed to estimate the proportion of customers’ views to within 2% of the true figure at the 95% confidence level? (6 marks) (Total 20 marks) 14
  • 17. Model Answer to Question 6 (a) (i) The standard error of the mean is the measure of dispersion of the sample means. It equals σ n (ii) A one tail test tests the direction of the difference between two statistics. A two tail test tests if there is a difference between the two statistics without regard to the direction. (b) Null hypothesis: There is no difference in the holiday cost between last year and September Alternative hypothesis: There is an increase in the holiday cost between last year and September Critical z value = 1.64 z = x –µ = 372.4 – 356.2 = 16.2 = 3.72 σ/ n 26.1 / 36 4.35 Conclusions: The calculated value of z is greater than the critical value of z. Reject the null hypothesis. There is evidence to suggest that the holiday cost has increased significantly. 0.02 0.02 (c) ± 1.96 > ± 1.96 > p(1 – p) 0.68 x 0.32 n n 2 0.022 0.0004 3.8416 x 0.2176 1.96 > 3.8416 > n> > 2,089.8 0.68 x 0.32 0.2176 0.0004 n n n = 2,090 15
  • 18. QUESTION 7 (a) In what circumstances is the multiplicative model preferable to the additive model in time series calculations? (4 marks) The table below shows the quarterly sales figures for a company: Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 1998 48 56 70 96 1999 64 76 86 132 2000 72 100 108 188 (b) By the method of centred moving averages, calculate the trend values for the time series and plot the trend on a graph. (10 marks) The average seasonal components calculated by the multiplicative method are shown below: Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 0.768 0.903 0.980 1.349 (c) Using the average seasonal components provided above and the original sales figures, calculate the seasonally adjusted sales and plot the results on the graph constructed for part (b). Comment on your results. (6 marks) (Total 20 marks) 16
  • 19. Model Answer to Question 7 (a) The multiplicative model is preferable when the data has a strong trend with the differences between the trend and the original data values varying proportionally to the trend values rather than absolutely. (b) (c) Qtr Sales Total m avg 1 m avg 2 Trend 1 48 2 56 3 70 270 67.5 69.5 4 96 286 71.5 74 5 64 306 76.5 78.5 6 76 322 80.5 85 7 86 358 89.5 90.5 8 132 366 91.5 94.5 9 72 390 97.5 100.25 10 100 412 103 110 11 108 468 117 12 188 17 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE
  • 20. Model Answer to Question 7 continued Sales Seasonal adjustment Seasonal Adjusted Sales 48 0.768 62.50 56 0.902 62.08 70 0.980 71.43 96 1.349 71.16 64 0.768 83.33 76 0.902 84.26 86 0.980 87.76 132 1.349 97.85 72 0.768 93.75 100 0.902 110.86 108 0.980 110.20 188 1.349 139.36 Comment: The trend and seasonally adjusted data values show little difference. This implies there is no change in the underlying trend. 18
  • 21. QUESTION 8 (a) When might a χ2 test be used? (4 marks) From its records, a company analyses its sales by size and region. The table below shows the results: Size of order Region £0 and up to £1,000 and up £3,000 and up £10,000 and £1,000 to £3,000 to £10,000 over Northern 40 33 20 15 Midlands 50 45 40 25 Southern 40 32 40 20 (b) Test whether there is a relationship between size of order and region. (12 marks) (c) Combining the three regions estimate a 99% confidence interval for the proportion of orders that are valued at less than £1,000. (4 marks) (Total 20 marks) 19
  • 22. Model Answer to Question 8 (a) The Chi-squared test is used to test for association between characteristics rather than variables, for randomness or changes in proportions. (b) Null hypothesis: There is no association between the size of order and region Alternative hypothesis: There is association between the size of order and region Degrees of freedom = (4 – 1)(3 – 1) = 6 Critical χ2 = 12.59 <£1,000 £1,000<3,000 £3,000<10,000 £10,000+ Region 40 33 20 15 50 45 40 25 40 32 40 20 Total 130 110 100 60 expected freq 35.1 29.7 27.0 16.2 52.0 44.0 40.0 24.0 42.9 36.3 33.0 19.8 contribution 0.684 0.367 1.815 0.089 to chi 0.077 0.023 0.000 0.042 0.196 0.509 1.485 0.002 5.288 2 χ = å (O – E ) = 5.288 E Conclusions: The calculated χ2 is less than the critical χ2 . There is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. There is no association between the size of order and region. (c) 99% confidence z = ± 2.58 p = 130/400 = 0.325, (1 – p) = 0.675 ci = p ± 2.58 p(1 – p ) / n = 0.325 ± 2.58 0.325 x 0.675 / 400 = 0.325 ± 2.58 x 0.0234 = 0.325 ± 0.0604 0.265 to 0.385 20
  • 23. 21 © LCCI CET 2002
  • 24. Education Development International plc The Old School Holly Walk Leamington Spa Warwickshire CV32 4GL United Kingdom Customer Service: +44 (0) 8707 202 909 Fax: +44 (0) 1926 887676 Email: customerservice@ediplc.com