How do we know they learn? The changing scope and role of evidence in student learning
1. Paul Prinsloo
University of South Africa (Unisa)
14prinsp
How do we know they learn?
The changing scope and role of
evidence in student learning
Image credit: https://pixabay.com/en/building-cctv-door-female-ladies-1839464/
Keynote at “Celebrating 15 years of Promoting Excellence in
Teaching and Learning”, 25-27 February 2018,
American University of Cairo
2. Imagecredit:https://pixabay.com/en/binary-code-man-display-dummy-face-1327512/
I do not own the copyright of any of the images in this
presentation. I therefore acknowledge the original
copyright and licensing regime of every image used.
This presentation (excluding the images) is licensed
under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License.
7. 22 November 2017
“But a growing body of evidence shows that over all,
college students learn less when they use
computers or tablets during lectures. They also tend
to earn worse grades. The research is unequivocal:
Laptops distract from learning, both for users and
for those around them. It’s not much of a leap to
expect that electronics also undermine learning in
high school classrooms or that they hurt
productivity in meetings in all kinds of workplaces.”
8. Haven’t we been here before?
Image credit: https://pixabay.com/en/shock-woman-portrait-hand-2757395/
9. 11 September 2016
Source credit: https://www.chronicle.com/article/No-Banning-Laptops-Is-Not-the/237752
10. Source credit: http://activehistory.ca/2014/07/a-brief-history-of-the-laptop-ban/
From 2011 – Duke University – “If classroom time is
primarily characterized by lectures, then laptops are
probably a distraction, and if students bring them to
class for note taking, it is quite likely that some will
use them for activities unrelated to the class.”
31 July, 2014
12. What may be haunting us, isn’t that they are not
learning, but that we are not solely in control of
their learning (as if we ever were…)
Image credit: http://geopoliticsrst.blogspot.com.eg/2014/12/isis-saudi-arabia-puppet-master-of-isis.html
15. Why do we need to know that they learn?
Because…
1. We can know
2. Metrics make the world go round
3. We know or the unbearable lightness of arrogance
4. We have the tools
5. Our students are broken and need fixing
6. We want to understand, listen and act
7. We ant to understand where/how we can help
them to do better
17. Source credit: https://www.amazon.com/Owned-Property-Privacy-Digital-
Serfdom/dp/1316612201/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1519453392&sr=8-4&keywords=owned
As learning moves increasingly online, we
(Silicon Valley, governments, data
brokers, commercial entities, and higher
education) have access to huge amounts
of intersecting, and mutually constitutive
data sets. And we own their data. And
we are owned.
The learning management systems we
use have become a treasure trove of
student data that we can process, scrape,
clean, dissect, mine, massage to find
patterns, and at times, make to fit our
assumptions about whether they are
learning or not
18. We have access to ever increasing volumes, velocity and
variety of student digital data, that allows us to expand not
only on the traditional scope of institutional research with
regard to student data, but also to infer relations
unthinkable ten years ago. We may therefore be tempted to
rush to look for patterns without considering our own
assumptions and epistemologies
There is a real danger to mistake the noise for a signal, and
not realise that the noise pollutes our data with false alarms
and “setting back our ability to understand how the system
really works” (Silver, 2012, p. 162)
22. Image credit: https://pixabay.com/en/justitia-goddess-goddess-of-justice-2597016/
We can only know when
we measure and when
we know we have the
power to to claim
understanding, to define
what is ‘true’, and based
on this ’truth’, we assign
positions, class, potential,
and futures that often
lock individuals into
fulfilling our ‘truths’
about them
24. “Evidence-based education seems to favour a
technocratic [and quantitative] model in which it is
assumed that the only relevant research questions
are about the effectiveness of educational means
and techniques, forgetting, among other things,
that what counts as “effective” crucially depends
on judgments about what is educationally
desirable” (Biesta, 2007, p. 5)
31. • We feed our data fetish, believing that more data are always
better data
• We believe that big(ger) data gives us a total picture where
n=all and that there is nothing we cannot know
• We believe that data are neutral and objective and not as
subjective as human decisions based on experience,
intuition and wisdom
• We create data proxies for the details of our students’ lives
for which we do not have data, or that we cannot quantify
• We think finding patterns is enough and we never care to
ask ‘why’?
And because we think we (can) know
everything…
32. Apophenia – “seeing patterns
where none actually exist,
simply because enormous
quantities of data can offer
connections that radiate in all
directions”
(boyd & Crawford, 2012, p. 668)
Our epistemological arrogance leads us to
see Jesus in a piece of burned toast
Seeing Jesus in toast: Irreverent ideas on
some of the claims pertaining to
learning analytics (Prinsloo, 2016) –
https://opendistanceteachingandlearning.wo
rdpress.com/2015/12/07/seeing-jesus-in-
toast-irreverent-ideas-on-some-of-the-claims-
pertaining-to-learning-analytics/
@Jesus_H_Toast
33. Citation: Pink, S., Ruckenstein, M., Willim, R., & Duque, M. (2018). Broken data: Conceptualising data in an
emerging world. Big Data & Society, 5(1), 2053951717753228.
35. Three sources of data
Directed
A digital form of
surveillance
wherein the
“gaze of the
technology is
focused on a
person or place
by a human
operator”
Automated
Generated as “an
inherent,
automatic function
of the device or
system and
include traces …”
Volunteered
“gifted by users
and include
interactions
across social
media and the
crowdsourcing of
data wherein
users generate
data” (emphasis
added)
Kitchen, R. (2013). Big data and human geography: opportunities, challenges and risks. Dialogues in Human
Geography, 3, 262-267. SOI: 10.1177/2043820613513388
42. • We know that we cannot cause learning to happen
and only create spaces and occasions where learning
can happen
• We know that there is a lot of learning that we plan
for that does not happen. Some of the learning we
plan for may happen (often despite our failures and
missed opportunities
• And we also know that there is also a lot of learning
that we did not plan for, that actually happens
Image credit: https://pixabay.com/en/guy-man-male-people-child-boy-2609607/
46. Image credit: https://pixabay.com/en/light-out-of-focus-focus-lamps-1068944/
What are the implications when we use their data
points to describe, diagnose, predict and prescribe
their learning journeys without ever asking them
what these data points mean to them, and what
data would matter to them to allow them to make
more informed decisions, to complete their journeys
and not ours?
47. Image credit: https://pixabay.com/en/camera-surveillance-camera-1778861/
Responsible and ethical learning analytics is found in
the nexus between their stories and ours. We cannot
afford to ignore the fact that it is their data, their
aspirations, their learning journeys and that our data
collection, analysis and use may not tell the whole
story.
58. Student Z
At the end of a 12-
week course: Have
they learned
(according to our
structure, our
criteria and what
we can and want to
measure)?
Exhibit E
60. Prinsloo, P. (2016, November 7 ). Failing our students: not noticing the traces they leave behind. [Web log post]. Retrieved from
https://opendistanceteachingandlearning.wordpress.com/2016/11/07/failing-our-students-not-noticing-the-traces-they-leave-
behind/
61. I thought I cared.
But I did not notice her/him falling behind. I
had access to data abut her/his engagement.
And somehow did not notice
Prinsloo, P. (2016, November 7 ). Failing our students: not noticing the traces they leave behind. [Web log post]. Retrieved from
https://opendistanceteachingandlearning.wordpress.com/2016/11/07/failing-our-students-not-noticing-the-traces-they-leave-
behind/
64. Paul Prinsloo (Prof)
Research Professor in Open Distance Learning (ODL)
College of Economic and Management Sciences, SP3-15, P O
Box 392, Unisa, 0003, Republic of South Africa
T: +27 (0) 12 433 4719 (office)
T: +27 (0) 82 3954 113 (mobile)
prinsp@unisa.ac.za
Skype: paul.prinsloo59
Personal blog:
http://opendistanceteachingandlearning.wordpress.com
Twitter profile: @14prinsp
Thank you