This presentation is designed to provide a more detailed look at the transportation investments envisioned for each scenario. It also includes some analysis and information presented at the citywide transportation workshop. This is intended to provide more detailed information, and isn’t necessary to complete the survey.”

1. Scenario Transportation Highlights

2. This slideshow highlights the range of transportation alternatives and outcomes for each of the four PLANiTulsa scenarios Comparing the Scenarios

3. How the Scenarios Compare Tulsa’s transportation investments go almost entirely to roads New Road Investments New Transit Investments

5. How the Scenarios Compare About 41% of transportation investments are devoted to transit New Road Investments New Transit Investments

6. Scenario B

7. How the Scenarios Compare About 41% of transportation investments are devoted to transit New Road Investments New Transit Investments

8. Scenario C

9. How the Scenarios Compare Most transportation investments are devoted to transit New Road Investments New Transit Investments

10. Scenario D

11. How the Scenarios Compare Investment priorities will have a have a big impact on how Tulsans get around

12. How the Scenarios Compare Each scenario also has a big impact on how much time Tulsans will spend in the car

13. Transportation New Lane-Miles of Road Constructed Scenario A would result in more total lane miles than the others.

14. Transportation Lane Miles of New Road Per 1,000 New Residents On per-capita basis, Scenario A would require more new roads for fewer new residents.

15. Transportation Per Capita Vehicle Miles Traveled (City) Scenarios B, C, and D would result in Tulsans driving fewer miles than Scenario A.

16. Transportation Gallons of Fuel Wasted Annually Due to Congestion Scenarios B and D would result in the least amount of fuel wasted due to traffic congestion

17. Transportation Citywide Value of Time Lost Due to Congestion (Annually, in millions) Scenarios B and D would result in the least amount of lost time due to traffic congestion.

20. Regional Survey Results

22. Source: US Census (2000) How Tulsans Get Around Town

23. http://www.cornelius-tulsa.com/Misc._-_Downtown.jpg Source: Tulsa: INCOG (2006) Albuquerque: Mid-Region COG (2000) Charlotte: Kimley-Horn & Associates (2000) Salt Lake City: Wasatch Front Regional Council (2005) Comparison: Roadways and Transit

24. Metro Population: 729,649 City Population: 448,607 Transit Ridership: 8,751,698 Total Lane Miles: 2,334 Albuquerque, NM

25. Metro Population: 1,330,448 City Population: 540,828 Transit Ridership: 21,176,801 Total Lane Miles: 1,274 http://www.lightrailnow.org/images02/sj-lrt-inaugural-trn-ar-Downtown-Campbell-stn-pax-20051001x_Peter-Ehrlich.jpg http://www.uncc.edu/admissions/tour/downtown.html Charlotte, NC

26. Source: National Transit Database (2006) Transit Indicators: Ridership Comparison

27. Metro Population: 968,858 City Population: 181,743 Transit Ridership: 38,594,690 Total Lane Miles: 864 2007 Recipient American Planning Association “Great Streets” Designation: South Temple Street Salt Lake City, UT

28. Tulsa San Francisco Salt Lake City Boston Network Design

29. http://farm1.static.flickr.com/107/315072192_27861ff3e4.jpg?v=0 Cost of Transportation

31. POTENTIAL TRANSPORTATION TOOLS Street Level Urban Redesign Potential corridors for this tool

32. Low Congestion = Flexibility in Design

33. Gridley, California: State Highway 99

35. Four-Lane Undivided Roadway Conversion to a Three-Lane Cross Section are viable for roadways with a maximum ADT of 16,000. They have been accomplished up to 24,000 ADT. Street-scale Urban Redesign

36. Cotati, California: Old Redwood Highway looking north

37. Highway Urban Redesign: Example: Seoul, South Korea

38. http://www.cornelius-tulsa.com/Misc._-_Downtown.jpg Volume/Capacity Analysis: Lanes with Level of Service D or Worse

39. Regional Commuter Rail Commuter rail service connects the large master planned communities around the region, the surrounding towns and villages, and even nearby cities, with the urban core. Potential Transportation Tools

40. Rapid Transit Technologies Bus Rapid Transit has the unique ability to function in either an exclusive right-of-way or in mixed traffic, however, the most common application assumes an exclusive right-of-way for operational efficiency and safety. E 71 st Street Potential Transportation Tools

41. The following slides summarize a variety of transportation improvements that Tulsa could potentially use over the next 30 years. Potential Transportation Tools

48. Irvine New Roadway

50. Irvine Multi-Use Path