Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Die SlideShare-Präsentation wird heruntergeladen. ×

Seema Mohapatra, "Abolishing the Myth of 'Anonymous' Gamete Donation in the Age of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing"

Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Wird geladen in …3
×

Hier ansehen

1 von 18 Anzeige

Seema Mohapatra, "Abolishing the Myth of 'Anonymous' Gamete Donation in the Age of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing"

Herunterladen, um offline zu lesen

May 17, 2019

Breakthroughs in genetics have often raised complex ethical and legal questions, which loom ever larger as genetic testing is becoming more commonplace, affordable, and comprehensive and genetic editing becomes poised to be a consumer technology. As genetic technologies become more accessible to individuals, the ethical and legal questions around the consumer use of these technologies become more pressing.

As these questions become more pressing, now is the time to re-consider what ethical and regulatory safeguards should be implemented and discuss the many questions raised by advancements in consumer genetics.

Presentation: Seema Mohapatra, Associate Professor of Law, Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law - Abolishing the Myth of “Anonymous” Gamete Donation in the Age of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing

Learn more: https://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/events/details/2019-petrie-flom-center-annual-conference

May 17, 2019

Breakthroughs in genetics have often raised complex ethical and legal questions, which loom ever larger as genetic testing is becoming more commonplace, affordable, and comprehensive and genetic editing becomes poised to be a consumer technology. As genetic technologies become more accessible to individuals, the ethical and legal questions around the consumer use of these technologies become more pressing.

As these questions become more pressing, now is the time to re-consider what ethical and regulatory safeguards should be implemented and discuss the many questions raised by advancements in consumer genetics.

Presentation: Seema Mohapatra, Associate Professor of Law, Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law - Abolishing the Myth of “Anonymous” Gamete Donation in the Age of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing

Learn more: https://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/events/details/2019-petrie-flom-center-annual-conference

Anzeige
Anzeige

Weitere Verwandte Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Seema Mohapatra, "Abolishing the Myth of 'Anonymous' Gamete Donation in the Age of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing" (20)

Weitere von The Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics (20)

Anzeige

Aktuellste (20)

Seema Mohapatra, "Abolishing the Myth of 'Anonymous' Gamete Donation in the Age of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing"

  1. 1. Faculty Name Here Course Name Here ABOLISHING THE MYTH OF “ANONYMOUS” SPERM DONATION IN THE AGE OF DIRECT-TO- CONSUMER GENETIC TESTING Seema Mohapatra, JD, MPH Consuming Genetics: Ethical Considerations of New Technologies 2019 Annual Petrie Flom Conference May 17, 2019
  2. 2. IUPUI, Robert H. McKinney School of Law TODAY’S DISCUSSION The US system of anonymous sperm donation Why anonymous sperm donation does not exist anymore in the U.S. due to DTC genetic testing Legal and policy options including state laws and private governance
  3. 3. IUPUI, Robert H. McKinney School of Law https://www.huffingtonpost.com/wendy-kramer/a-brief- history-of-donor- conception_b_9814184.html?ncid=engmodushpmg0000000
  4. 4. IUPUI, Robert H. McKinney School of Law https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/aug/15/americ as-hottest-export-sperm-fertility Sperm: “America’s Greatest Export”
  5. 5. IUPUI, Robert H. McKinney School of Law https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/08/health/sperm-donor-facts.html The Thriving US Sperm Market Donors” paid between $30 - $120 per sample (Multi- billion dollar industry) Option of Donor Anonymity
  6. 6. IUPUI, Robert H. McKinney School of Law https://blogs.cdc.gov/ genomics/2018/06/12 /consumer-genetic- testing/
  7. 7. IUPUI, Robert H. McKinney School of Law https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/16/health/sperm-donation-dna- testing.htmlhttps://www.23andme.com/?mdc2=true THE STORY OF DANIELLE TEUSCHER
  8. 8. IUPUI, Robert H. McKinney School of Law https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/2018/1 0/11/even-if-youve-never-taken-dna-test-distant- relatives-could-reveal-your- identity/?utm_term=.88db8b0ecd36 Parties Affected by the End of Donor Anonymity Donor- Conceived Individuals Those Who Use Purchased Sperm Sperm Banks and ART Industry Sperm Donors
  9. 9. IUPUI, Robert H. McKinney School of Law https://www.thetgmi.org/genetics/direct-to-consumer-genetic-testing/ The Moot Ethical Debate
  10. 10. IUPUI, Robert H. McKinney School of Law https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2018/05/sperm-donation-anonymous/560588/ DONOR-CONCEIVED INDIVIDUALS AND ANONYMITY
  11. 11. IUPUI, Robert H. McKinney School of Law The Legal Landscape • No federal laws regarding anonymity • Rigorous testing for diseases (FDA) Federal Laws: • Washington was first state to enact disclosure laws for non-medical information • Utah enacted medical disclosure laws State Laws:Federal Laws State Laws THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE
  12. 12. IUPUI, Robert H. McKinney School of Law Clinics should “fully inform donors and recipients of donor gametes of their clinic's policies about information sharing and contact, but they should caution that policies cannot be guaranteed if laws or individual circumstances change and that the possibility exists of contact from offspring in the future.” American Society of Reproductive Medicine (“ASRM”) PRIVATE GOVERNANCE
  13. 13. IUPUI, Robert H. McKinney School of Law Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Interests, obligations, and rights in gamete and embryo donation: an Ethics Committee opinion, Fertility and Sterility, April 2019 “Programs should caution participants that policies related to information sharing are not guaranteed since laws or individual circumstances change and that there is a possibility they may be contacted by offspring in the future. Similarly, maintaining anonymity of parties cannot be guaranteed since commercially available genetic testing and agencies that allow dissemination of identifying information through social media increases the risk of inadvertent disclosure of participants.” ASRM Ethics Committee Opinion, April 2019
  14. 14. IUPUI, Robert H. McKinney School of Law Federal (unlikely): A federal mandate against anonymous donation by the FDA as requested by a Citizen Petition of the Sibling Donor Registry State Efforts? State bans tied to licensing of banks/clinics POTENTIAL LEGAL SOLUTIONS?
  15. 15. https://pged.org/direct-to-consumer-genetic-testing/ PRIVATE GOVERNANCE OPTIONS GOING FORWARD SART/ASRM need to have stronger language that discourages using the language of anonymity/the category of anonymous donors Donor and recipient counseling about the likelihood of disclosure
  16. 16. IUPUI, Robert H. McKinney School of Law https://blog.celmatix.com/finding-the-right-fertility-clinic-for-lgbtq-parents-to-be-e31bec4e0c1a POSSIBLE RAMIFICATIONS Weakening of the sperm bank industry Lack of supply for LGBTQ/ infertile individuals/single women seeking sperm
  17. 17. IUPUI, Robert H. McKinney School of Law Options Going Forward ASRM/SART should issue stricter guidelines for member clinics about the of donor anonymity State licensing/accreditation could be tied to not making promises of anonymity Broader question about unintended consequences of DTC testing Better engagement/counseling with those interested in using donor sperm and those who are donors about the reality of anonymity
  18. 18. IUPUI, Robert H. McKinney School of Law Contact Information: Seema Mohapatra mohap@iu.edu On Twitter: @profmohapatra

×