Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Ten Simple Rules for Changing How Scholars Communicate
1. Ten Simple Rules for Changing How
Scholars Communicate
Philip E. Bourne, PhD, FACMI
Associate Director for Data Science
National Institutes of Health
September 23, 2015
2. History & Lets Crowd Source?
http://www.ploscollections.org/article/browse/issue/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fissue.pcol.v03.i01
2.6 million downloads
3. Rule 1
Figure Out the Flow & Go With It
(Aka Leverage What is Already
Happening)
5. We are at a Point of Deception …
Evidence:
– Google car
– 3D printers
– Waze
– Robotics
– Sensors
From: The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress,
and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies
by Erik Brynjolfsson & Andrew McAfee
7. Are We Being Deceived?
The 6D Exponential Framework
Digitization
Deception
Are We Here?
Disruption
Demonetization
Dematerialization
Democratization
Open science
Free & Usable
Knowledge
8. Rule 2
Recognize Thus Far That Open
Access Has Been a Disappointment
http://mujeresdelsiglo21.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/little-girl-crying-1280x800.jpg
9. Rule 2 OA Disappointment
Access has improved; leveraging the content only
marginally?
The profits of closed access journals has increased –
presumably at the cost of more scholarship?
The system is still broken – OA has not
fundamentally changed how scholars communicate
10. Rule 3
“Still Crazy After All These Years”
Not Paul Simon But Ten Years After
11. 1. A link brings up figures
from the paper
0. Full text of PLoS papers stored
in a database
2. Clicking the paper figure retrieves
data from the PDB which is
analyzed
3. A composite view of
journal and database
content results
Here is What I Want – The Paper
As Experiment
1. User clicks on thumbnail
2. Metadata and a
webservices call provide
a renderable image that
can be annotated
3. Selecting a features
provides a
database/literature
mashup
4. That leads to new
papers
4. The composite view has
links to pertinent blocks
of literature text and back to the PDB
1.
2.
3.
4.
PLoS Comp. Biol. 2005 1(3) e34
21. Rule 8 Lever: Reproducibility
I can’t immediately reproduce the research in my own
laboratory:
• It took an estimated 280 hours for an average user to
approximately reproduce the paper
• Workflows are maturing and becoming helpful
• Data and software versions and accessibility prevent exact
reproducibility
Daniel Garijo et al. 2013 Quantifying Reproducibility in Computational Biology:
The Case of the Tuberculosis Drugome PLOS ONE 8(11) e80278 .
23. The Research Lifecycle
IDEAS – HYPOTHESES – EXPERIMENTS – DATA - ANALYSIS - COMPREHENSION - DISSEMINATION
Authoring
Tools
Lab
Notebooks
Data
Capture
Software
Analysis
Tools
Visualization
Scholarly
Communication
Commercial &
Public Tools
Git-like
Resources
By Discipline
Data Journals
Discipline-
Based Metadata
Standards
Community Portals
Institutional Repositories
New Reward
Systems
Commercial Repositories
Training
24. The Research Lifecycle
IDEAS – HYPOTHESES – EXPERIMENTS – DATA - ANALYSIS - COMPREHENSION - DISSEMINATION
Authoring
Tools
Lab
Notebooks
Data
Capture
Software
Analysis
Tools
Visualization
Scholarly
Communication
Commercial &
Public Tools
Git-like
Resources
By Discipline
Data Journals
Discipline-
Based Metadata
Standards
Community Portals
Institutional Repositories
New Reward
Systems
Commercial Repositories
Training
25. Rule 10 Prove Me Wrong
So remember, when you're feeling very small
and insecure
How amazingly unlikely is your birth
And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere
up in space
'Cause there's bugger all down here on Earth
Monty Python - Galaxy Song Lyrics |
MetroLyrics
Five Big Problems to Solve:
Finding, Accessing, Interoperating with, and Re-using the data (FAIR principles)
Extending policies and practices for data sharing
Organizing, managing, and processing biomedical Big Data
Developing new methods and tools for analyzing biomedical Big Data
Training researchers who can use biomedical Big Data effectively