1. Pulling the Pieces Back Together:
Safety, Space & Solvency Top Budget Priorities
Superintendent’s Recommended 2014-15 Budget
Revised: 3/6/2014 12:44 PM

2. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The preparation of the annual budget is a substantial leadership responsibility. Recent trends in the country’s business community and
the school community suggest that quality is achieved through the involvement of many persons.
The development of the proposed 2014-2015 School District budget is consistent with the trends aiming toward quality. The District
administrators, building administrators, teachers, staff, parents, and indirectly students, all had input into the development of the
budget. All are to be commended.
Collaboration requires leadership. Keeping people included and focused upon a common mission requires greater leadership and
time. The people whose names appear below provided the leadership that made the development of the proposed budget possible.
Ms. Maureen Boozang-Hill, Director of Pupil Personnel Services
Ms. Maria Catalina, Executive Secretary to the Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction
Ms. Regina M. Cellio, Principal, Anne M. Dorner Middle School
Ms. Jean Chen, Treasurer
Ms. Ann Dealy, Principal, Brookside School
Mr. James Dennett, Director of Health, Physical Education, and Athletics
Ms. Joan Garone, Executive Assistant for Human Resources and Title IX Coordinator
Mr. Andrew Lennon, Assistant Business Administrator
Mr. Jeremy Luft, Director of Technology
Mr. Joshua Mandel, Principal, Ossining High School
Ms. Victoria Marrin, Secretary to the Assistant Superintendent for Business
Ms. Kate Mathews, Principal, Claremont School
Mr. James Minihan, Transportation Supervisor
Mr. Bradley Morrison, Director of Cultural Arts
Ms. Ileana Ortiz, District Clerk
Ms. Mirla Puello, Director of Literacy and ESL
Ms. Nicole Reis, Executive Assistant to the Superintendent
Dr. Corey Reynolds, Principal, Roosevelt School
Ms. Carrieann Sipos, Principal, Park School
Mr. Kenneth Waldron, Director of School Facilities, Operations and Maintenance
Dr. Angela White, Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction
Ms. Alita Zuber, Assistant Superintendent for Business
The efforts extended by the people named above are gratefully acknowledged.
Mr. Raymond Sanchez
Superintendent of Schools

3. OSSINING UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Mr. Raymond Sanchez
Superintendent of Schools
March 3, 2014
CONFIDENTIAL
MEMORANDUM TO:
Board of Education Colleagues
FROM:
Raymond Sanchez
Alita Zuber
Dr. Angela White
RE:
Superintendent’s Proposed School District Budget:
2014-2015 School Year
Superintendent of Schools
Assistant Superintendent for Business
Assistant Superintendent for
Curriculum and Instruction
INTRODUCTION
In the Ossining School District, we are dedicated to ensuring that all students are
educated well. Our goal is to prepare our students to be successful in whatever they
choose to do after graduating from Ossining High School. The budget serves as a “means
to an end,” providing the resources necessary to ensure that we can and will achieve that
goal. Yet, at the same time, we must understand and respond to the fiscal needs of our
community.
This year’s budget focuses on three areas:



Educational Solvency: Ensuring that we provide educational programs that meet
the needs and interests of our students.
Security: Enhancing security equipment throughout our schools to ensure the
safety of our students.
Space: Addressing the need for adequate instructional space across the district.
BUDGET PROCESS
The budget process began with a meeting of our Administrative Team to review the
effectiveness of our existing programs. At the same time, members of the Citizen’s
Budget Advisory Committee have been lobbying the state on the District’s need for
additional Foundation Aid. These efforts have included a community forum, letters,
meetings with legislators and numerous trips to Albany. We also spoke at the recent state
Budget Hearing. For additional information related to Foundation Aid please click here.

4. Our approach to the budget has been both transparent and collaborative. We have
worked hard to ensure that the budget provides programs that meet the needs of every
child in our District and help to avoid educational insolvency.
GOALS OF OUR BUDGET DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
It has been noted in our presentations that we had the following goals in mind during the
development of this budget.
 Avoid educational insolvency by continuing advocacy efforts to increase the
Foundation Aid that Ossining is legally entitled to receive, which is projected to
be an additional $7M in 2014-15.
 Continue to maintain transparency through surveys, informational meetings, and
Community Budget Advisory Committee efforts.
 Continue to evaluate opportunities for sustainable budget savings and slowing
expenditure growth.
AREAS OF FOCUS: EDUCATIONAL SOLVENCY, SECURITY AND SPACE
Educational Solvency:
This budget reflects the continuation of our electives at Ossining High School, the
Science Research Program, after school programs at AMD and programs in the arts and
athletics. Based on our February 26th Board of Education meeting and survey results, we
know our community values teacher to student ratio. We have been experiencing
increases in enrollment. Yet, we have made every effort to ensure that we address the
need for instructional staff in grades PreK-12. Particular emphasis has been made to
address class size at AMD. This budget also seeks to address the needs in Special
Education and English as a Second Language classes.
We have dissected every non-instructional area in search of efficiency, economies of
scale, and expense reductions wherever possible to preserve as many programs for as
long as possible. We successfully reversed the trajectory of health costs as well as
administrative and transportation expenses growth back to 2009 levels. These cuts have
resulted in over $6.3 million in the past year alone. Additional savings/cost avoidance
measures include the following:




Identified $4.6 million in capital improvements with no budget impact through an
Energy Performance Contract (EPC).
Received $2.5 million in competitive grants.
Negotiated Triborough for teacher and administrator contracts.
Saved $1.2 million over 12 years by re-financing bonds.
Throughout the process, we carefully considered the impact that the decisions would
have on our students. Our goal is to ensure that the needs of our students are met and that
2

5. we take into account the values of our community. The items in this memo reflect the
current status of state aid. Again, our focus is to remain educationally solvent.
Safety And Space
The Administration and Board of Education recognize the importance of budgeting for
building maintenance and understand the long-term effects of not supporting funds for
capital projects. While the capital bond project approved last year by our community will
help to provide significant improvements to our facilities, it does not meet all of the
District's needs. As a result, the District continues to recommend the funding of the
transfer-to-capital budget line to ensure that we continue to address some of our on-going
capital improvements not included in the capital bond. Additionally, one of the Board’s
goals is to address future space needs in our elementary schools. The 2014-15 Budget
reflects these anticipated needs.
Student safety continues to be a district priority. As such, the 2014-15 budget contains
funds for additional cameras and an improved surveillance system that will help
emergency response efforts.
Savings from closing capital projects completed below budget as well as remaining funds
from the self-insured health and long-term disability plans no longer needed since the
District has moved to predictable premium based plans are being used as appropriated
fund balance. These savings and remaining funds will be used to cover non-recurring
expenses to avoid a cliff in the following year when the funds are no longer available.
New, recurring expenses like the lease for storage and administrative space will have no
impact on the tax levy. Lease expenses will be offset with expense reductions in health,
Xerox Copier equipment, fuel oil, and bond re-financing.
OTHER AREAS OF INTEREST
Transportation
As part of the budget, we will be asking our community to consider voting on decreasing
the transportation mileage limits for Claremont School. We are recommending that we
decrease the limits to .5 miles for students in grade 4. Below you find details related to
the proposal.
Grade Level
Grade 3
Grade 4
Current Mileage Limit
½ mile
1 mile
Proposed Mileage Limit
½ mile
½ mile
This change will not impact the District budget. Yet, our community must vote to make
the change. This change will be put to the voters by way of a separate proposition at the
annual election and meeting on May 20th.
3

6. REVENUES
The information below provides the best projections available at the time of this writing.
Modifications to revenue projections will be provided as they become available.
State Aid
On January 22, 2013, Governor Andrew Cuomo released his proposed budget to the
legislators which included projected state aid to school districts. Under the Governor’s
proposal, the Ossining School District would see an increase of approximately $862,000
in state aid when compared to 2013-2014 budget.
Other Revenue Sources
There are other limited revenue sources that comprise the total revenue to support the
budget. The two major areas are composed of state aid and property taxes. At this time,
the District anticipates that it will realize approximately $20,271,736 in revenues other
than property taxes and appropriation of Fund Balance for the 2014-2015 school year.
This compares with $16,425,000 which the District had anticipated last year at this time
for the current 2013-2014 school year. We will continue to monitor revenue projections
and will adjust accordingly, prior to setting the tax warrant.
Proposed Budget and Tax Levy
Our 2014-2015 proposed budget is below the District Tax Levy Limit or Cap. The
proposed budget reflects a budget-to-budget increase of 2.86% or a dollar value of
$3,160,790. Consideration will be given to the amount of Fund Balance that will be
allocated to offset property taxes. Given the anticipated revenues as referenced above of
$20,271,736 and an appropriation of Fund Balance and the Retirement Contribution
Reserve Fund in the amount of $2,890,871, the District projects an estimated tax levy of
$93,322,506 which represents a tax levy increase of $1,865,554 or 2.04%, which is below
the District Tax Levy Limit or Cap calculated to be 2.06% for the 2014-2015 school year.
Fund Balance
Through extremely careful planning during the 2013-2014 school year, strategic
exercising of cost saving efficiencies, and deferring various projects, it is anticipated that
the District will be able to realize an authorized Fund Balance of four percent (4%). This
Fund Balance is advantageous within the context of a conservative budget. Given the
potential for emergencies and unexpected situations, maintaining a Fund Balance is quite
important.
4

7. Tax Rates
As always, at this time of year there are far too many unknown variables and factors
relating to state aid to project a firm tax rate. Presently, the Governor’s State Aid
Executive Proposal has been of concern for the Ossining School District as well as all
districts throughout New York State. We are aggressively reaching out to legislators to
address this issue relative to the State Budget. We do expect to project estimated tax
rates soon.
It is important to note that there are still outstanding tax certiorari claims that have not
been settled. Tax certiorari claims may enable taxpayers to reduce the assessments on
their properties. Until such time as the tax rolls are set in August, the impact upon the
final tax rate can not be determined.
The potential assessment value decreases will have an impact on the tax rate within the
three towns of the Ossining School District. Equalization rate changes, determined by
the New York State Office of Real Property Services [ORPS], also will affect
apportionment of the school tax levy causing a potential shift in each share of the levy.
We provide this information in order to promote greater understanding of the tax rate
issues that are well beyond the control of the District.
SUMMARY
As stated previously, our budgetary goal was to ensure that we maintain quality programs
for the students we serve in the Ossining School District. We worked to addressed three
areas: educational solvency, safety and space. Furthermore, we continue to support the
following areas: academics, athletics, and cultural arts. Yet, the budget still remains
below the Tax Levy Cap.
We encourage our community to stay informed throughout the process. Below are a few
ways that you can stay connected:
In conclusion, we want to thank everyone who helped to develop the Superintendent’s
Proposed Budget.
RS/nr
2-25-13 School Budget 2014-2015 Budget Memo to BOE 061
5

8. Ossining Union Free School District
2014-15 Budget
Table of Contents
Page
1. Executive Summary – Letter from the Superintendent
2. Table of Contents
1
3. Statistical Information (Gold Section)
A. 2014-15 General Fund Budget Pie Chart
B. 2013-14 General Fund Budget Pie Chart
C. Pupil Enrollment as of October of Each Year
D. Administrative Staff
2
3
4
5
4. Budget
A. Budget Summary
B. General Support (Pink Section)
C. Instructional (Blue Section)
D. Transportation (White Section)
E. Undistributed (Green Section)
6
7
26
69
74
5. Appendices
A. Administrative Salary Disclosure 2014-15
B. Administrators with Salaries over $126,000
C. Analysis of Assessed Valuations – Ossining
D. Analysis of Assessed Valuations – New Castle
E. Analysis of Assessed Valuations – Yorktown
F. Special Aid Fund Projects 2013 – 2014
G. Chapter 436 – Budget Presentation
H. Analysis of State Aid Received
I. 2014-15 Per Pupil Allocations
J. Preliminary Income Estimates
K. Determination of Estimated Tax Rate
L. Exemption Impact Report - Ossining
M. Exemption Impact Report – New Castle
N. Exemption Impact Report – Yorktown
O. Property Tax Report Card
P. The New York State District Report Card for 2012-13
1
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD

9. 2014-15 GENERAL FUND BUDGET
T ransportation
Operations & Maintenance
Debt Service/Interfund
5 .0 %
4 .2 %
5 .3 %
Administration
3 .3 %
3 .5 %
Central Services
2 .3 %
Employee Benefits
Non-Public Schools
2 4 .9 %
5 1 .5 %
Instruction
IN S T R U C T IO N
$58.53 MILLION
T R A N S P O R T A T IO N
$5.74 MILLION
C E N T R A L S E R V IC E S
$4.0 MILLION
E M P L O Y E E B E N E F IT S
$28.3 MILLION
D E B T S E R V IC E /IN T E R F U N D
$4.73 MILLION
N O N -P U B L IC S C H O O L S
$2.61 MILLION
2
O P E R . & M A IN T E N A N C E
$5.98 MILLION
A D M IN IS T R A T IO N
$3.7 MILLION

10. 2013-14 GENERAL FUND BUDGET
Debt Service/Interfund
T ransportation
4 .9 %
3 .6 %
3 .3 %
Operations & Maintenance 5 .0 %
Administration
3 .4 %
Central Services
2 .2 %
Employee Benefits
Non-Public Schools
2 5 .8 %
5 1 .8 %
IN S T R U C T ION
$57.2 MILLION
T R AN S P OR T AT ION
$5.35 MILLION
C E N T R AL S E R V IC E S
$3.79 MILLION
E M P L OYE E B E N E F IT S
$28.45 MILLION
D E B T S E R V IC E /IN T E R F U N D
$4.0 MILLION
N ON -P U B L IC S C H OOL S
$2.45 MILLION
3
Instruction
OP E R . & M AIN T E N AN C E
$5.54 MILLION
AD M IN IS T R AT ION
$3.65 MILLION

11. PUPIL ENROLLMENT AS OF OCTOBER OF EACH YEAR
2004-05 to 2014-15
PRE-K
KINDERGARTEN
ELEMENTARY
MIDDLE
HIGH
SCHOOL
TOTAL
OUT OF
DISTRICT
PLACEMENTS
2004-05
214
288
1,477
865
1,313
4,157
44
2005-06
251
342
1,476
822
1,251
4,142
41
2006-07
270
323
1444
838
1,287
4,162
44
2007-08
283
342
1,478
829
1,307
4,239
44
2008-09
288
365
1,539
849
1,347
4,388
43
2009-10
276
355
1,588
861
1,370
4,450
38
2010-11
252
351
1,678
871
1,303
4,455
35
2011-12
248
382
1,721
916
1,335
4,602
36
2012-13
238
379
1,801
915
1,312
4,645
30
2013-14*
252
365
1,842
986
1,269
4,714
35
2014-15**
275
349
1,854
995
1,271
4,744
24
* Enrollment based on BEDS (Basic Educational Data System) Report dated October 2013
**Projected Enrollment
4

12. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
2013-14
2014-15
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
14.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
14.00
Director of Pupil Personnel Services
Assistant Director of Pupil Personnel Services
Director of Elementary School Literacy and ESL
Director of Cultural Arts
Director of Technology
Assistant Director of Technology
Director of Health, Physical Education and Athletics
Total
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
7.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
7.00
Grand Total
24.00
24.00
Central Administration
Superintendent of Schools
Assistant Superintendent for Business
Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction
Total
School Administration
Elementary Principal
Elementary Principal
Elementary Principal
Elementary Principal
Middle School Principal
High School Principal
Elementary Assistant Principal
Elementary Assistant Principal
Middle School Assistant Principal
Middle School Assistant Principal
Middle School Assistant Principal
High School Assistant Principal
High School Assistant Principal
High School Assistant Principal
Total
Program Administration
5

13. 6

14. 7

15. 8

16. 9

17. 10

18. 11

19. 12

20. 13

21. 14

22. 15

23. 16

24. 17

25. 18

26. 19

27. 20

28. 21

29. 22

30. 23

31. 24

32. 25

33. 26

34. 27

35. 28

36. 29

37. 30

38. 31

39. OSSINING UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT
DECISION PACKAGE
PACKAGE NAME
DIRECTOR OF CULTURAL ARTS
RESOURCES REQUIRED
2012-2013
BUDGET
2013-2014
BUDGET
2013-2014
CUR. EXPENSE
2014-2015
BUDGET
CHANGE IN
BUDGET
STATEMENT OF PROGRAM AND GOALS
PERSONAL SERVICE
The Director of Cultural Arts is responsible for supervision of instruction
and coordination of all programs in the visual and performing arts for the
District (K - 12). The Director of Cultural Arts:
1. Develops, implements and articulates educationally sound curricular
and instructional practices based on the New York State Learning
Standards in the arts.
2. Provides assistance and professional development for faculty and
facilitates projects which are deemed important for improving cultural
arts opportunities for students.
3. Assures that state mandates related to the cultural arts are fulfilled
and implemented.
4. Provides for and maintains all equipment, supplies and materials
related to the Cultural Arts Program.
5. Coordinates the District's arts programs, exhibitions and
performances with building administrators and community
organizations.
6. Facilitates departmental participation in educational research and
conducts scheduled arts faculty meetings.
2024-1XX-00 STAFF SALARIES
-Cultural Arts (1.0)
151,414
160,169
175,713
141,016
(19,153)
TOTAL
151,414
160,169
175,713
141,016
(19,153)
1,000
1,000
703
1,000
0
14,400
14,400
14,128
15,450
1,050
4,000
4,000
3,476
5,000
1,000
0
0
0
7,200
7,200
19,400
19,400
18,307
28,650
9,250
170,814
179,569
194,020
169,666
(9,903)
BENEFITS
OTHER THAN PERSONAL SERVICE
The Cultural Arts program provides significant and educationally
meaningful arts experiences for students in the Ossining School
District. The program seeks to maintain high standards through
ongoing development of programs that reflect current educational
trends in arts education.
2024-400-00 STAFF DEVELOPMENT
2024-401-00 OTHER EXPENSES
2024-500-00 SUPPLIES
2024-550-00 MATERIAL GOODS
Additionally, the program delivers quality teaching and creative
learning experiences through a certified arts faculty, meaningful
assessment practices and responsive curriculum design.
TOTAL
PACKAGE TOTAL
PREPARED BY
BRADLEY MORRISON
32
DATE
FEBRUARY 2014

40. 33

41. 34

42. 35

43. 36

44. 37

45. 38

46. 39

47. 40

48. 41

49. 42

50. 43

51. 44

52. 45

53. 46

54. 47

55. 48

56. 49

57. 50

58. 51

59. 52

60. 53

61. 54

62. 55

63. 56

64. 57

65. 58

66. 59

67. 60

68. 61

69. 62

70. 63

71. 64

72. 65

73. 66

74. 67

75. 68

76. 69

77. 70

78. 71

79. 72

80. 73

81. 74

82. 75

83. 76

84. 77

85. Appendix A
Administrative Salary Disclosure
2014 - 2015
Superintendent of Schools
$232,000
Annual Salary
$ 40,670
$ 11,726
$ 10,712
Breakdown of Annualized Cost of Benefits
- Mandatory TRS Contribution at 17.53% of annual salary
- Contribution to Health/Dental/Vision/Term Life/Workers’ Compensation/Disability Insurance
- Required: Social Security and Medicare
$ 63,108
Annualized Cost of Benefits
Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction
$179,671
Annual Salary
$ 31,496
$ 22,260
$ 9,859
Breakdown of Annualized Cost of Benefits
- Mandatory TRS Contribution at 17.53% of annual salary
- Contribution to Health/Dental/Vision/Term Life/Workers’ Compensation/Disability Insurance
- Required: Social Security and Medicare
$ 63,615
Annualized Cost of Benefits
Assistant Superintendent for Business
$198,429
Annual Salary
$ 34,785
$ 22,869
$ 10,131
Breakdown of Annualized Cost of Benefits
- Mandatory TRS Contribution at 17.53% of annual salary
- Contribution to Health/Dental/Vision/Term Life/Workers’ Compensation/Disability Insurance
- Required: Social Security and Medicare
$ 67,785
Annualized Cost of Benefits
78

86. Appendix B
ADMINISTRATORS WITH SALARIES OVER $126,000*
2014 ‐ 2015
The following information is presented as required by Chapter 474 of the Laws of 1996,
the State of New York.
School Administration
Principal
Principal
Principal
Principal
Principal
Principal
$152,307
$155,184
$158,463
$171,922
$184,656
$197,391
Elementary Assistant Principal
High School Assistant Principal
High School Assistant Principal
High School Assistant Principal
$154,268
$159,186
$159,186
$159,186
Program Administration
Director of Cultural Arts
Assistant Director of Technology
Director of School Facilities, Operations and Maintenance
Assistant Director of Pupil Personnel Services
Director of Technology
Director of Pupil Personnel Services
Director of Elementary Literacy and ESL
Director of Health, Physical Education and Athletics
79
$141,016
$146,192
$137,330
$150,383
$159,896
$171,922
$171,922
$171,922

87. Appendix C
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSED VALUATIONS, SCHOOL BUDGETS AND SCHOOL TAX RATES
OSSINING
ASSESSED
YEAR
VALUATION
TOTAL SCHOOL
CHANGE IN ASSESSED VALUATION
AMOUNT
TAX
CHANGE IN TOTAL BUDGET
BUDGET
PERCENTAGE
AMOUNT
RATE
PERCENTAGE
CHANGE IN TAX RATE
AMOUNT
PERCENTAGE
2004-05
191,897,569
1,210,547
0.63%
77,070,589
5,746,052
8.86%
293.66
24.58
9.13%
2005-06
194,637,934
2,740,365
1.43%
83,915,126
6,844,537
8.88%
319.00
25.34
8.63%
2006-07
194,729,767
91,833
0.05%
90,425,294
6,510,168
7.76%
334.16
15.16
4.75%
2007-08
196,403,010
1,673,243
0.86%
95,979,505
5,554,211
6.14%
353.16
19.00
5.69%
2008-09
196,286,589
(116,421)
-0.06%
100,389,446
4,409,941
4.59%
364.62
11.46
3.24%
2009-10
196,755,754
469,165
0.24%
100,832,030
442,584
0.44%
364.83
0.21
0.06%
2010-11
196,023,596
(732,158)
-0.37%
101,780,654
948,624
0.94%
376.78
11.95
3.28%
921,734
0.47%
103,502,510
1,721,856
1.69%
381.67
4.89
1.30%
2011-12
196,945,330
2012-13
194,420,462
(2,524,868)
-1.28%
106,588,570
3,086,060
2.98%
431.63
49.96
13.09%
2013-14
192,958,634
(1,461,828)
-0.75%
110,433,452
3,844,882
3.61%
413.94
-17.69
-4.10%
80

88. Appendix D
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSED VALUATIONS, SCHOOL BUDGETS AND SCHOOL TAX RATES
NEW CASTLE
YEAR
ASSESSED
VALUATION
CHANGE IN ASSESSED VALUATION
AMOUNT
TOTAL SCHOOL
BUDGET
PERCENTAGE
CHANGE IN TOTAL BUDGET
AMOUNT
PERCENTAGE
TAX
RATE
CHANGE IN TAX RATE
AMOUNT
PERCENTAGE
2004-05
76,296,095
(95,998)
-0.13%
77,070,589
6,448,743
9.13%
90.24
2.38
2.71%
2005-06
75,967,068
(329,027)
-0.43%
83,915,126
6,844,537
8.88%
93.51
3.27
3.63%
2006-07
75,910,306
(56,762)
-0.07%
90,425,294
6,510,168
7.76%
102.33
8.82
9.43%
2007-08
75,276,416
(633,890)
-0.84%
95,979,505
5,554,211
6.14%
97.26
-5.07
-4.95%
2008-09
74,602,589
(673,827)
-0.90%
100,389,446
4,409,941
4.59%
107.50
10.24
10.53%
2009-10
75,272,388
669,799
0.90%
100,832,030
442,584
0.44%
108.37
0.87
0.81%
2010-11
72,415,553
(2,856,835)
-3.80%
101,780,654
948,624
0.94%
115.16
6.79
6.27%
2011-12
71,720,339
(695,214)
-0.96%
103,502,510
1,721,856
1.69%
114.89
-0.27
-0.23%
2012-13
70,536,680
(1,183,659)
-1.65%
106,588,570
3,086,060
2.98%
125.93
11.04
9.61%
2013-14
69,976,409
(560,271)
-0.79%
110,433,452
3,844,882
3.61%
125.37
-0.56
-0.44%
81

89. Appendix E
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSED VALUATIONS, SCHOOL BUDGETS AND SCHOOL TAX RATES
YORKTOWN
ASSESSED
YEAR
VALUATION
TOTAL SCHOOL
CHANGE IN ASSESSED VALUATION
AMOUNT
PERCENTAGE
TAX
BUDGET
CHANGE IN TOTAL BUDGET
AMOUNT
PERCENTAGE
RATE
CHANGE IN TAX RATE
AMOUNT
PERCENTAGE
2004-05
1,401,220
32,491
2.37%
77,070,589
6,449,743
9.13%
811.81
162.76
25.08%
2005-06
1,474,123
72,903
5.20%
83,915,126
6,844,537
8.88%
803.98
-7.83
-0.96%
2006-07
1,551,068
76,945
5.22%
90,425,294
6,510,168
7.76%
821.62
17.64
2.19%
2007-08
1,605,849
54,781
3.53%
95,979,505
5,554,211
6.14%
866.97
45.35
5.52%
2008-09
1,611,891
6,042
0.38%
100,389,446
4,409,941
4.59%
897.63
30.66
3.54%
2009-10
1,634,448
22,557
1.40%
100,832,030
442,584
0.44%
877.30
-20.33
-2.26%
2010-11
2,964,341
1,329,893
81.37%
101,780,654
948,624
0.94%
913.41
36.11
4.12%
2011-12
2,972,777
8,436
0.28%
103,502,510
1,721,856
1.69%
852.22
-61.19
-6.70%
2012-13
2,972,879
102
0.00%
106,588,570
3,086,060
2.98%
974.89
122.67
14.39%
2013-14
2,963,255
-0.32%
110,433,452
3,844,882
3.61%
949.24
-25.65
-2.63%
(9,624)
82

90. Appendix F
SPECIAL AID FUND PROJECTS 2013 - 2014
Project Name
Salaries
Equipment
Other
Supplies
Fringe
Indirect
Grand Total
IDEA, Part B Section 611
662,900
0
199,648
24,467
275,446
1,207
1,163,668
IDEA, Part B Section 619
13,125
0
18,566
0
0
0
31,691
Title I A&D
455,239
0
44,930
20,989
49,418
0
570,576
Title II Part A
135,924
0
3,729
0
0
0
139,653
Title III, LEP
80,204
0
0
0
0
0
80,204
Bank Street Teacher Leadership Program
28,759
0
0
0
7,241
0
36,000
Strengthening Teacher Leader Effectiveness
57,321
0
198,357
3,435
13,700
6,598
279,411
Strengthening Teacher Leader Effectiveness II
85,168
0
17,500
2,089
36,743
3,679
145,179
McKinney-Vento Education of Homeless
15,068
0
17,694
400
3,638
0
36,800
Pre-Kindergarten Program
760,378
0
103,619
4,000
341,589
0
1,209,586
Response to Intervention
123,953
0
4,000
0
0
0
127,953
First Steps
218,546
0
1,676
1,624
82,091
0
303,937
Ossining Matters
17,939
19,850
68,868
11,181
4,522
0
122,360
Parent Leadership Project
40,359
0
11,150
225
15,726
0
67,460
8,736
0
2,234
502
2,383
0
13,855
Fund for the Improvement of Education
Race to the Top
10,024
0
27,239
1,000
0
0
38,263
Teacher Centers
22,900
0
500
108
3,702
707
27,917
2,736,543
19,850
719,710
70,020
836,199
12,191
4,394,513
Total
Includes new funding in the current school year.
Excludes carry over funds with the exception of Ossining Matters programs funded in 12/13 for the 13/14 Fiscal Year, and PLP and First Steps.
Excludes all non-federal, non-state grants with new funding less than $25k.
Excludes Extended School Year, Teachers Center (funds raised via charges), Summer Handicap
83

91. APPENDIX G
CHAPTER 436 - BUDGET PRESENTATION
OSSINING UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Code
Description
2013-2014 Budget
Administrative
1010
1040
1060
1240
1310
1320
1325
1420
1430
1460
1480
1620
1680
1999
2010
2020
2022
2024
2060
2070
2110
2111
2112
2250
2251
2252
2253
2254
2255
2280
2330
2331
2332
2610
2630
2805
2810
2815
2820
2825
2850
2855
5510
5540
8060
9000
9500
9700
9900
Board of Education
Office of District Clerk
District Meetings
Office of Chief School Administrator
Business Administration
Auditing
Treasurer
Legal
Human Resources
Records Management
Office of Public Information
Operations & Maintenance
Central Data Processing
Undistributed Expenses
Curriculum Development and Supervision
Building Administration
Director of Physical Education
Director of Cultural Arts
Research and Evaluation
In-Service Training
Instruction-Regular School
GO-TV and WOSS-FM
Textbooks - Other
Special Education - Instructional
Director of Pupil Personnel Services
Special Ed - Tuition & Related Services
Special Ed - Speech & Language
Special Ed - BOCES Placements
Special Ed - Resource Ed/Consultant
BOCES - Occupational Education
Extended Day/Year and Community Support
Academic Intervention Services
Enrichment
Library - Salaries & Equipment
Instructional Technology
Attendance
Guidance Department
Health Services
Psychological Services
Social Worker
Co-Curricular Activities
Interscholastic Athletics
Transportation
Contract Transportation
Community Learning Center
Employee Benefits
Transfer to Capital Funds
Debt Service
Transfer to Other Funds
Totals
Percentage of Total Budget
Total Budget
2014-2015 Proposed Budget
Program
Capital
Administrative
Program
Capital
37,449
70,095
26,770
351,396
955,153
62,060
14,733
30,900
314,362
40,504
129,787
0
814,762
725,633
295,749
3,414,452
297,492
175,569
403,833
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,281,797
0
0
38,205
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
243,180
0
0
0
0
0
198,804
614
127,212
3,500
4,000
0
221,451
32,149,679
91,511
33,280
6,742,036
1,066,657
3,353,860
957,180
1,941,300
668,315
1,623,367
65,928
123,938
149,446
485,409
2,115,264
280,016
1,000,279
1,043,835
476,212
286,495
200,809
675,540
601,766
6,452,595
0
23,414,137
0
0
562,497
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,539,460
0
184,459
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,869,297
661,000
3,338,422
0
39,988
72,531
28,260
351,915
957,096
61,040
13,985
57,780
389,339
47,295
125,802
0
851,026
760,406
321,368
3,447,091
237,835
157,466
433,580
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,049,018
0
0
58,875
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
262,220
0
0
0
0
0
222,750
27,300
85,000
4,500
12,200
0
362,272
32,595,977
94,813
29,695
6,939,174
1,112,828
3,163,127
979,265
1,935,000
678,739
1,704,536
63,328
161,183
145,703
589,057
2,161,966
284,371
1,091,849
1,113,255
494,946
316,545
210,223
731,455
637,734
6,748,524
15,000
23,712,539
0
0
881,852
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,984,278
0
188,610
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,661,877
1,075,000
3,653,855
0
11,480,701
87,360,112
11,592,638
11,461,696
89,568,926
12,563,620
10.4%
79.1%
10.5%
10.1%
78.8%
11.1%
110,433,452
84
113,594,242

92. Appendix H
ANALYSIS OF STATE AID RECEIVED
FISCAL YEAR
SCHOOL BUDGET
AID RECEIVED
TOTAL BUDGET
2003 - 04
70,621,846
7,971,467
11.29%
2004 - 05
77,070,589
7,712,012
10.01%
2005 - 06
84,093,637
8,856,858
10.53%
2006 - 07
91,546,532
10,262,411
11.21%
2007 - 08
95,979,505
11,589,479
12.07%
2008 - 09
100,389,446
13,506,141
13.45%
(1)
2009 - 10
100,832,030
13,657,847
13.55%
(2)
2010 - 11
101,780,654
12,944,529
12.72%
2011 - 12
103,502,510
12,873,431
12.44%
(3)
2012 - 13
106,588,570
13,067,639
12.26%
(4)
2013 - 14
110,433,452
12,886,648
11.67%
(1) Note: 2009 - 10 State Aid includes Federal Economic Stimulus Funding of $1,852,223
(2) Note: 2010 - 11 State Aid includes Federal Economic Stimulus Funding of $855,550
(3) Note: 2012 - 13 State Aid includes Federal Medicaid Aid of $20,695
(4) Note: Estimated 2013-14 State Aid is subject to change as of 2-18-2013
85

93. 86

94. 87