4. Policies: topics (brief)
● Manufacturing locally, and creating global impact
● Distributed energy production
● Cryptocurrency for a new economy
● Food production and urban permaculture
● Educating for the future
● Building the future circular [spiral] economy
● Collaboration between governments and the civil society
31. The Italian Maker Community, mapped
Source: http://www.openp2pdesign.org/2013/social-network-analysis/mappando-la-comunita-italiana-di-makers-e-
fabbing/
32. The Italian Maker Community, mapped
Source: http://www.openp2pdesign.org/2013/social-network-analysis/mappando-la-comunita-italiana-di-makers-e-
fabbing/
33. The Italian Maker Community, mapped
Source: http://www.openp2pdesign.org/2013/social-network-analysis/mappando-la-comunita-italiana-di-makers-e-
fabbing/
34. A project on GitHub, mapped
Source:http://www.openp2pdesign.org/2013/social-network-analysis/mining-the-social-interactions-on-github/
35. A project on GitHub, mapped
Source:http://www.openp2pdesign.org/2013/social-network-analysis/mining-the-social-interactions-on-github/
42. Maker labs?
Source: Menichinelli, M. (2016). Mapping the structure of the global maker laboratories community through Twitter
connections. In C. Levallois, M. Marchand, T. Mata, & A. Panisson (Eds.), Twitter for Research Handbook 2015 – 2016 (pp.
47–62). Lyon: EMLYON Press. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.44882
47. Participation?
Source: Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–
224. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01944366908977225 + http://www.vcn.bc.ca/citizens-
handbook/arnsteinsladder.html
48. Participation as a tool
Source: https://github.com/OpenDesign-WorkingGroup/Open-Design-Definition
49. Participation in open projects (?)
While researchers are becoming increasingly interested in studying OSS phenomenon, there is
still a small number of studies analyzing larger samples of projects investigating the structure of
activities among OSS developers. The significant amount of information that has been gathered in
the publicly available open-source software repositories and mailing-list archives offers an
opportunity to analyze projects structures and participant involvement. In this article, using on
commits data from 263 Apache projects repositories (nearly all), we show that although OSS
development is often described as collaborative, but it in fact predominantly relies on radically
solitary input and individual, non-collaborative contributions. We also show, in the first published
study of this magnitude, that the engagement of contributors is based on a power-law distribution.
Source: Chełkowski, T., Gloor, P., & Jemielniak, D. (2016). Inequalities in Open Source Software Development: Analysis of
Contributor’s Commits in Apache Software Foundation Projects. PLOS ONE, 11(4), e0152976. http://doi.org/10.
1371/journal.pone.0152976
53. Projects
● Not finished in 5 days: communication is more important
than project depth & debugging
● Project = a story about a possible side of a Fab City
● Project = an idea we could discuss with stakeholders
● Location-based storytelling with Odyssey.JS
59. Projects
● Concept? Today, during the morning
● Stakeholders? Today, during the morning
● Manufacturing plan? Today, during the afternoon
● Documentation / Odissey.JS? Tomorrow