Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
Presentation
1. COUPLING SUPERCONDUCTING QUBITS
VIA A CAVITY BUS
MAJER ET.AL. NATURE (2007)
OVIDIU COTLET AND LÁSZLÓ SZŐCS
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 1
2. DiVincenzo’s Criteria for
Quantum Computing
1. Scalability and well-defined qubits
2. Initialization of qubits
3. Small decoherence
4. 1 and 2 qubit gates
5. Measurement
arXiv:cond-mat/9612126
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 2
3. Motivation
o Previous studies have shown that two
nearby qubits can be coupled with local
interactions
o Highly desirable to perform gate
operations between two distant qubits
– How to accomplish?
– Use a quantum bus (cavity photons) to
transfer information Strong coupling limit
o Why use photons?
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 3
4. Experiment Goals
o Demonstrate a coherent, nonlocal
coupling between two qubits in a
transmission line cavity
o Cavity mediates the qubit-qubit interaction
via photons
Blais et al. Rhy. Rev. A (2007)
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 4
5. THEORY
o Begin with the Jaynes Cummings (JC)
Hamiltonian
o Eigenstates and eigenenergies readily obtained
o Vacuum Rabi splitting can be observed by
moving to a rotating frame and solving the
equations of motion
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 5
6. THEORY
o The solution is
, which produces 2 peaks at
o This allows for a measurement of the
coupling constant
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 6
7. Theory
o Consider the strongly dispersive limit,
o Using the canonical Schrieffer-Wolf
Transformation, eliminate interaction term
to 1st order
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 7
8. THEORY
o That was for 1 qubit. How about 2?
o Natural generalization:
o Can easily show that
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 8
9. THEORY
o Salient features:
– No TLS-cavity interaction (no energy is
exchanged)
– Cavity frequency shifted by qubit state
– Qubit-qubit interaction can be effectively
turned off by making the qubits strongly
detuned from one another:
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 9
10. THEORY
o A.C. Stark Shift: rearrange the Hamiltonian
o By applying a strongly detuned drive, we can
adjust the number of photons in the
cavity, thereby adjusting the qubit transition
frequency.
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 10
12. Strong Qubit-Cavity Coupling
o Demonstrate that each-qubit can be
strongly coupled to the cavity
o Use vacuum Rabi splitting to determine
the coupling constants
o Ensures that we can go into strongly
dispersive limit and that qubit-qubit
coupling is big
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 12
13. Strongly Dispersive Limit
o Cavity shields qubits from the
environment.
o Can further isolate qubit by strongly
detuning it from the cavity
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 13
14. Qubit-Qubit Interaction
o Qubits interact by exchanging their
excitations through virtual photons in the
cavity:
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 14
15. Single Qubit Control
o Demonstrate fast control of each qubit
individually in order to satisfy the 1st part
of criteria 4
o Detune the qubits from one another:
o Apply a pulse at , then apply a
measurement pulse at to monitor
transmission
o From transmission, infer :
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 15
16. Single Qubit Control
o Response consistent with that of single qubit Rabi
oscillation coupling does not affect single qubit
operation
o Determine decoherence time to be 78 and 120
ns, which is larger than the coherent manipulation
time
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 16
17. Multiplex Measurement
o Use π pulses to put your qubits into desired states:
o Use probing field resonant with cavity and compare
theoretical (via master equation) with actual value
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 17
18. Coherent State Transfer Between
Qubits
o Can transfer the state of one qubit to the
other by turning qubit-qubit coupling on
and off
o Use off-resonant Stark drive to quickly push
qubits into resonance
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 18
19. Coherent State Transfer
1. Initially qubits are 80 MHz detuned, and are
allowed to relax to
2. Apply π pulse to create or
3. Apply Stark pulse to bring qubits into
resonance for some variable time
Because not eigenstates of
system, we’ll see oscillation
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 19
20. Coherent State Transfer
o Quarter period of
oscillation between
qubits is
o This is the second
part of
DiVincenzo’s
criterion 4
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 20
21. Coherent State Transfer
o Observed qubit-qubit
oscillation frequency
agrees very well with
value of J measured
from CW spectroscopy
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 21
22. Summary
o Demonstrated non-local coupling of qubits
o Qubit-qubit interaction is due to the
exchange of virtual photons, protecting
against cavity induced losses
o Qubits may be manipulated individually
and a universal 2 qubit gate can be
performed
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 22
23. Summary
1. ✓
Scalability and well-defined qubits
2. Initialization of qubits ✓
3. Small decoherence ✓
4. 1 and 2 qubit gates ✓
5. Measurement ✓
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 23
24. Thank you for your time and attention.
5/12/2012 Majer et al. Nature (2007) 24
Paper in 2000 in which author proposed cirtiera for a qunatum computer. has been guide in the fieldscaleable: can double number of qubits with polynomial increasein resources -Most of the criteria have been met in different qubits-focus on 2 qubit gates
-Why use photons: highly coherent and can mediate interactions between distance objects-In a cavity QED system, we have enhanced qubit-photon interactions-If we work in the strong coupling limit, we have a coherent interaction between TLS-photon, permitting information transfer.
Start with JCM in the RWA
One of the regimes well consider is the strongly dispersive
No TLS-cavity interaction: no exchange of excitationsIt will be useful to turn off the qubit-qubit interaction in order to apply 1-qubit gates
Top: schematic of cavity. -2 transmon qubits, located at opposite cavity ends -Coplanar waveguide interrupted by 2 coupling capacitors (mirrors)
Why work in the strongly dispersive limit?----- Meeting Notes (12/5/12 12:45) -----In this limit we can use the cavity as a medium connecting the qubits and obtain a spin-spin Hamiltonian
First qubit absorbs a nonresonant photon: non-energy conserving process, so the probability of happening is small. This information is transmitted through the cavity to the other qubit that goes to the ground state such that the whole process is energy conserving. That means that the probability of happening is small.
Satisfy criteria 4 and 3 (sort of), in that we can manipulate the qubits before they decohere
Solid line is theory, dots are actual dataDecay is decoherence: <a+a^\\dagger> decays exponentially
Black line: homodyne voltage due to Stark pulse without pi-pulse being applied to either qubitThin lines: without stark pulseAverage over 3E6 tracesiSWAP- Universal quantum gate.How do we know this is really a manifestation of the qubit-oscillation term in the Hamiltonian?
Plot of the obersved qubit oscillation frequency and the calculated frequency splittingWhy should we observe a dark stateQubit1: 6.469, Qubit2: 6.546
Virtual particle: a particle that exists for a limited time and space. Obeys energy-time uncertainty.Virtual photons have mass (from borrowed energy) b/c they exist for limited time, giving them limited “range”