1. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT :
CASE OF SIEMENS
Sepehr Haghighat Afshar
Vahid Karimi
Knowledge Management Course
Instructor: Dr. Sadeghi
Fall 1390
2. CONTENT
About Siemens
Emergence of KM in Siemens
Technical infrastructure
Managing of Change
Organizational Outcomes
Conclusion
References
3. ABOUT SIEMENS
World leader in electrical engineering and electronics
Comprehensive product range – everything from mobile phones to
power plants
Net sales approaching DM 150 billion
Broad base of 570,000 shareholders
More than 440,000 experts in over 190 countries
4. I give you an idea
Emergence of KM in Siemens
What if they fall in love, get married and have kids?
You give me an idea
5. WHY KM IS IMPORTANT FOR SIEMENS
• Products and services increasingly knowledge-intensive and customized
• Organization’s value resides in people - but they are more mobile than ever
• Innovation increasingly in processes, organizations, financing
• Strategic partnerships and alliances growing competitive advantage
6. WHY KM IS IMPORTANT FOR SIEMENS
• e-business and service business the major business transformations
• Global, decentralized, process-oriented and team-based organizations
• Accelerating volume of information
• Live-long learning becomes a must for every employee
• New ways of collaboration and management - “the orchestration of
global knowledge networks” - are becoming the crucial competitive
advantage
7. EMERGENCE OF KM IN SIEMENS (STAGE I)
• Initiated 1996 by a community of interest through the organization who were :
Doing Research
Learning what others were doing
Aware of KM’s benefits
Steps to implement KM
• Creating repositories
• Communities of practices (CoP)
• Informal tech. of sharing knowledge
! Without senior executive support
8. EMERGENCE OF KM IN SIEMENS (STAGE II)
• In 1999 central board of Siemens
• Created an organizational unit for KM purpose
• Developed ShareNet
• Appointing Expert Moderators Responsible for Virtual Networks
• Carried out Resistance Management Strategies
9. SHARENET : MAJOR FUNCTIONS
• Combines elements of a database repository
• Chartrooms available
• A search engine
• Online entry forms for storing useful information
• Browsing by topic
• Urgent requests
10. TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
SHARENET
The Goal:
To provide their
customers with
world-class solutions
by leveraging their
global competences
The old system
The Status in October 2000:
ShareNet implemented in 51 major countries
51 ShareNet Managers assigned and trained
8.000 ShareNet users registered
8.000 „Knowledge Objects“ available
2000 urgent requests answered last year
400 reuse cases
The ICN ShareNet® World
A new spirit
Globally networked flows of
knowledge
Centralized flows of
information
= Countries using ICN ShareNet (51)
12. COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE
A CoP is a group of persons who, based on a shared interest in a subject area of
relevance to the business, exchange and develop knowledge and provide mutual
support beyond the boundaries of organizational units. The participants pursue
both individual and business goals through forms of cooperation that are not subject
to any restraints in terms of time and may be either virtual or face-to-face in nature.
13. COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES AND COMMUNICATION
CHANNELS
Communication & information management
regular sharing & coordination meetings
Ad-hoc problem solving & cooperation
Creation of transparence to experts,
contact persons and information sources
learning, documentation & training
Benchmarking, knowledge acquisition,
idea generation & innovation
14. better,
faster & JIT,
more innovative
more efficient
business-processes
of involved
community
members
CoP-Outputs
solutions
for daily
problems
Targets
used
synergy
effects
developed or
combined new
knowledge
coordinated
activities in the
organisation
quick learning
curve; high
knowledge level
relevant,
qualitative
information
business-contacts;
identified
experts
Info
17. • Change through content (Blue change)
• Technical change
• Introducing ShareNet
• Bilingual interface
• …
• Change through people (Red change)
• Change individual attitudes
CHANGE
Change management is supporting individual
to change their attitudes
18. MANAGING THE CHANGE
• Implementing the new system encountered multiple barriers
Corporate
culture
Loss of
personal
market value
Time
constraint
As internal competition
increases the level of
knowledge sharing
decreases
Employees are afraid of
becoming superfluous if
they
share personal knowledge
Sharing of knowledge
takes
time, which people in
general
do not have
20. MANAGING THE CHANGE
• One of the most admired methodological approaches to change management is one
developed by Senge P. named ADKAR
Awareness Desire Knowledge Ability Reinforcement
21. MANAGING THE CHANGE
Awareness
• Communication
• sponsorship
roadmap
desire
• incentives
• Top
management
support
• ShareNet itself
knowledge
• training
ability
• coaching
reinforcement
• Changing
compensation
system (stable
incentive system)
• Selection
strategy (job
description)
22. Outcomes
Product Leadership
higher quality products, thereby providing
higher value to customers
more innovative and advanced products
Customer Intimacy
increased orders and number of winning
proposals
best practice and tailor-made solutions
improved customer satisfaction
Operational Excellence
less costly client services and higher net
profit
more timely product services,
less rework and reduced inventories
23. CONCLUSION
• KM may be one of the major tools that will help Siemens prove that large diversified
conglomerates can work and that being big might even be an advantage in the
information age.
• Implementing a profound KM project will result in high organizational profits when
organizations not only consider technical side of the project, but also human and cultural
sides. This needs a systematic, methodological implementation of change management
process.
24. REFERENCES
• Davenport, T. H., & Gilbert, P. J. (2002). Knowledge Management Case Book. John Wiley
and Sons.
• Nielsen, B. B., & Ciabuschi, F. (2003). Siemens ShareNet: knowledge management in
practice. Business Strategy Review, 14(2), 33-40.
• Peyman Akhavan, Mostafa Jafari, & Mohammad Fathian. (2006). Critical success factors
of knowledge management systems: a multi-case analysis. European Business Review,
18, 97-113.
• Rothnie, D. 2001. ShareNet: Siemens Information and Coomunication Networks. In V.
Mellor, E. Barn Field , Startegies for best practice intranet management ,London Melcrum
Publishing : 186-194.
• Voelpel, S. C., & Han, Z. (2005). Managing knowledge sharing in China: the case of
Siemens ShareNet. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 9, 51-63.
• www.siemens.com