Essay On Non Violence

Benefits Of Nonviolence Movement Essay
Imagine a world of peace where everyone is cheerful at any given time. People don't have to
worry about danger or whether or not they lock their doors at night. No one has to live in fear of
anything ranging from bullying to terrorist attacks. Hurting people in any way is the last thing on
one's mind and being kind and helpful is the first. Now picture the current situation of the world. It
is near impossible to go a day without at least one story of violence on the news. People live in fear
and dream of a "perfect world" of peace. Thanks to the Nonviolence Movement, this dream of a
"perfect world" can become a reality. This movement works towards using peaceful methods in any
situation or to bring about political change. According...show more content...
Even though individuals appreciate the positive intentions, they believe a world of peace is simply
impossible and there will always be people in the world with nothing but hate in their hearts. People
aso believe war is necessary to bring about significant change. They speculate nothing will be
accomplished and people will simply be taken advantage of if they don't put up a fight. However,
nonviolent methods have worked in the past. For example, Gandhi led India to it's independence
without bringing about harm. Despite the violent forces that battle him in the beginning, he and his
followers held out. Eventually, his opponents felt sympathy and gave in to his cause. His dedication
showed the significant social poer this form of struggle could create. In addition to Gandhi, there are
other notable examples that successfully used nonviolence. A few are Rosa Parks, Martin Luther
King Jr., and college students that participated in sit–ins. Their actions and influence impacted
history in a positive way, with several people of all ages using them as role models. Although it
would take a lot of time, patience, and dedication, a pure world of nonviolence is
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay On Non Violence
How did non violence help the equality in the world?
"Nonviolence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest
weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man." this is one of the most famous quotes from
Mahatma Gandhi. Therefore, nonviolent conflicts is to win over the opposing side by peruading
them into agreeing on the subject that which the matter is presented. As a method of preforming a
nonviolent conflict is that giving the opposing side to change their mind or have to give the
protesters wants and needs. For nonviolents conflicts does not want the opposing side to suffer but,
they want them to sweat in order to get what they want for the cause. Nonviolents shows that
violents is nearly removes...show more content...
Where millions of african americans that fought to end the discrimination and segregation in the
early 1960s. As Martin Luther King success of the movement was his strategy of protesting that
equal right are not born for just one race but, for all. As all theses protest for their equal rights they
only used non–violent as a way to win. As MLK supported this cause and lead it his inspiring
approach on the alternative method on non–violent protest. Where he was inspired by Mahatma
Gandhi from his movement of their independence. For MLK led millions of african americans to
the streets for multiple peaceful protests as well as acts of civil disobedience, and boycotts. As the
non–violent was acted in many places like Birmingham, Alabama. Which during that time people
where getting murdered, homes being set on fire and much worst just to see if they will fight back.
As 1965 their was a march for voting rights in Alabama as this is remembered as "Bloody Sunday."
Where they went on the ,arch they just came towards them with night sticks and with them releasing
the tear gas. As they used the attack dog and fire hoses to stop the protesting of school children

"An unjust law is itself a species of violence. Arrest for its breach is more so. Now the law of
nonviolence says that violence should be resisted not by counter–violence but by nonviolence. This I
do by breaking the law and by peacefully submitting to arrest and imprisonment." (Mahatma
Gandhi) Since Americas independence until today people try to find different approaches to defeat
the inequality and the oppression. An old traditional thought is that violence can only be treated
with violence, there is no room left for an analysis of the situation and try to approach it differently.
Yet, there are ways like Gandhi quote states if we have to break the law and accept the
consequences to counter violence by non–violence might as well accept this method; either way
people suffer the consequences for "breaking the law". On the onther hand, a nonviolence movement
will shift people view on the positive side rather than the negative side; demonstrating that
nonviolence method will achieve justice in a peaceful way without the consequences of violence.
The best method to advocate justice is by fostering a Non–violent character to people and to stand
up against the enemy with intelligence.
Fighting inequality and oppression with violence has being an old school thought that had been
penetrated in the people mid since they were little, and the consequences of such thought had been
showed through the course of history. For instance in the letter from a Birmingham Jail, Martin

Martin Luther King Non Violence Resistance
After watching those two videos, I strongly believe in non–violence resistance. In order for a social
movement to have a greater impact on society, it is better not to use violence. As the book says, if
the cost of making some concessions are so threatening to elites, however, that they may decide to
fight hard and even violently against a movement for years or even decades (Luders 2010).
Relating to this quote, Martin Luther King said that even if black people use violence, they will
end up losing the battle because either they will be arrested, or they will be killed. Just as Martin
Luther King, I am a strong believer in non–violence resistance. I believe it will have a bigger impact
and influence on the opponent. The use of violence hinders

Non Violence Vs Nonviolence Essay
Nonviolence seeks to defeat injustice not people. I believe that means we can defeat injustice and
speak out without having to hurt others in the process. There is so much violence in the world and
we need to take a step forward as a community, nation, and one world. We will not survive in a
world of violence. In fact, we will destroy ourselves and there IS something you can do about it.
Something our communities could do is compare and contrast violence and nonviolence.
WE can be the difference in this world. That one principle could be a huge leap for us as humans.
There is so much violence in this world and it is killing us. My community alone is full of
violence on a daily basis. Teens think it is cool to be the "tough one", "the one who can take
anyone on". I believe that is where violence is begun, the youth. Not only do the teens fight, but
their younger siblings and peers look up to people like them and become violent as teens and later
adults. If we taught kids not to be violent and stressed that especially growing up it would definitely
make a difference.
Another reason I think violence is as prominent as it is now may have to do with all the news
broadcasts about police brutality and other violent outbursts. Everyone was raised to "speak up for
yourself' and "not let people push you...show more content...
If we were taught to be more loving and accepting of others we could do anything. However,
someone has to make that first step for our generation. We cannot rely on other people to do that
for us. If we did it would never get done. One of my favorite quotes is by Mahatma Gandhi. "There
are many causes I would die for. There is not a single cause I would kill for." We all have causes we
really care about and would do anything for. There is just one thing we all need to remember: we
are all human and are on this Earth for a reason, killing each other is not one of those

The Approach of Nonviolence Essay
"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" (Mahatma Gandhi), welcome to the world of
non–violence, not similar to 'disney land' but merely a small philosophical village coated in white,
decorated with crystals and abundant in doves; white resembling peace, crystals for clarity and
pure spirit and doves for .. I don't know, I guess I have been driven by my imagination.
There is a considerable debate about the precise meaning of nonviolence. Some people believe that
nonviolence is a philosophy and strategy for social change that rejects the use of violence. In other
words, nonviolence is a method for resolving a conflict without the use of physical power nor enmity
towards opponents. Instead, it emphasizes you to look beyond...show more content...
Day by day humans tend to be inhuman; selfishness, cruelty, hatred, jealousy and materialism have
ripped off the warmth from our lives making it cold and unsafe. A man may allow himself a wide
latitude in the matter of diet and yet may be a personifier of ahimsa and compel our homage, but a
man who is always over–scrupulous in diet is an utter stranger to ahimsa and pitiful wretch, if he is
a slave to selfishness and passions and is hard of heart. (Gandhi, The Gospel of Non–Violence)
Gandhi expresses the problem of selfishness and greed among humans, thus turning themselves into
slaves for power, wealth and fame. Allah the all mighty talks about this very same point in his holy
Quran by saying "We have certainly created man in the best of stature" (At–tin 95:4) and he also
says "Indeed, We guided him to the way, be he grateful or be he ungrateful." (Al–insan 76:3),
although the literal meaning of these scriptures may seem different, but the true meaning needs
explanation, and those two scriptures meant that Allah all mighty, have created human beings free;
not obliged by any person or anything. But humans blinded by their greediness, became slaves for
materialistic assets forgoing morality, knowledge and wisdom. And to defeat all this, we need to
practice nonviolence as a way of living, because it will help us to retain the forgone moral
possessions which are the key ingredients for a peaceful, truthful,

Non Violence Definition
Non–violence: The act of solving a dispute in a rational way that ends without violence from all
sides of the quarrel.
Yes, I am very familiar with non–violence. When I think of non–violence, I definitely have someone
in mind that I think of when the topic is brought to attention. This person is my mother. My mother
solves all of her problems with a non–violent solution. She uses non–violence as a way to resolve all
of her conflicts and meet goals she sets for herself. As my mother is a broker, she deals with private
clients that invest their money in her in sometimes stressful situations, so it is important for her to
keep a calm mentality and deal with her clients in a way that does not provoke the client to make
rash decisions. My mother

The Civil Rights Movement brought many accomplishments to African Americans such as the 1964
Civil Rights Act, Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the Fair Housing Act of 1968. The key issues that
African Americans fought for were voting rights, integration and racial equality. They were tired of
the discrimination and humiliation they received as a result of the segregation laws imposed on
them. "State laws mandated racial separation in schools, parks, playgrounds, restaurants, hotels,
public transportation, theaters, restrooms and so on" (Blumberg 40). Lawsuits had been tried to gain
rights such as the unsuccessful Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896 and the successful Brown v. Board of
Education of Topeka. Although, the Brown v. Board of Education of...show more content...
The strategy of violence was a divisive force in the Black community; many African American
protestors were indecisive in which way to fight for their rights.
Violence also proved to be unproductive because it only caused more resistance and chaos in time of
confrontation. Violent protests such as riots ended up damaging the Black Community. African
Americans resulted being the victims of these riots, and as a result the most affected by the violent
confrontations. Moreover, the use of violence created stiff race relations between the African
Americans and White. Demonstrating that the violence method was ineffective for the civil rights
movement is the fact that the "Black power movement faded almost as quickly as it appeared"
(Ware 161).
The nonviolence tactic was more effective than violence in the Civil Rights Movement because it
caused many throughout the nation to feel sympathy for the African American cause. Particularly,
many White people began to sympathize with African Americans. Many joined organizations, thus
supporting various forms of protesting including sit–ins, pray–ins, wade–ins, marches, boycotts,
rallies, and Freedom Rides (Blumberg 1).The cooperative work between Whites and African
Americans helped with the integration objective. In addition, the turmoil occurring throughout the
country drove the two presidents of

Nonviolence: The Cause Of Non Violence
As Ghandi states on the first paragraph on page 81 "Nonviolence is the greatest force at the
disposal of mankind." This is a very true statement, No one is born to be a violent towards anyone
or anything. Nonviolence is a key factor for most protesting. If you are violent while to protest
you are only provoking the person you are trying to protest against. Nonviolence can take you
very far with protesting or anything of that matter because you are not provoking or bothering
anyone, you are peacefully protesting. A good example of how nonviolence can work is how
current NFL players are kneeling rather than acting out and going crazy. It's actually working
because it's taken the whole world by storm and has even caught the eye of the president. Though
we live in a world where violence happens all over the place using nonviolence can help the world
evolve and become a better place. Loving who are going against is crucial when being nonviolent.
As Stephen Prothero states on page 178 "Metta is often...show more content...
It was purely devastating and is hard to fathom that someone could honestly do that. People like
that are scum. Regardless of it we should not use violence but rather we should meditate and try to
answer the problem at hand. As Gandhi explains "Every murder or other injury , no matter for
what cause, committed or inflicted on one another is a crime against humanity." This is true
statement because of the simple fact that hurting someone is not the way to get your point across.
Mercilessly killing people for no reason only makes matters worse for our world. It makes people
paranoid and hard to trust people. I purpose that we should all go to sangha and try to find ways
and means to fix issues in the world so that another las vegas shooting never happens again. This
Shooting should give people the reminder that violence is all around but love can conquer

The Pros And Cons Of Nonviolence
Nonviolence is the use of peaceful methods instead of force, to bring political or social change.
However, practicing nonviolence is much more difficult than this short definition. Also, people may
argue that why just using force against force? If using violence is more efficient, why bother to use
nonviolence? Furthermore, using violence is more easy and direct, but nonviolence requires more
strategy and effort to really make progress. The truth is, using force against force rarely worked,
and it's never really brought political and social improvement to reach the positive peace in the
society. In the World War II, the United State dropped two nuclear bombs on Hiroshima Japan, and
lead to many unnecessary deaths and nuclear radiation for many years after the explosion. Then, if
not using force to return, what should we do to deal with the extreme violence? What is the most
efficient nonviolence method to do when you face a brutality?
There are three types of violence: political violence to intimidate, physical violence to terrorize and
mental or emotional violence to undermine (Elworthy, 2012). All three of them have the same
propose: use violence to put themselves above other people. Using force to scare other side and let
them surrender. However, the 'perpetrator' is much more scarred than the 'victim'. Aung San Suu Kyi,
the peaceful freedom fighter in Burma. When she was leading a group of students on a protest in the
streets of Rangoon. The soldiers came around and

World Peace and Nonviolence
World Peace and Non–violence
Ganadhipati Tulsi
Society consists of innumerable individuals having a common bond. That bond is mutuality.
Plurality constitutes collectivity, but mere collectivity does not become society without the bond of
mutuality. Without a common thread the beads would not make a rosary and it is of utmost
importance to examine and evaluate the thread.
We live as part of society and the unit of society is the individual. Like individuals like society and
vice versa. The above relationship is both ways true but relatively so. In modern times, society is
conceived in terms of economic conditions and their management. It is assumed that if the latter are
good the individual will be good too. Behind this assumption is the...show more content...
Disarmament does offer a solution to the problem of war, but it cannot offer an adequate solution in
the absence of a proper study of the factors leading to a war. And these factors are expansionism,
the tendency of some countries to impose their political system and life style on others and the
mentality of universal proselytization. We must address ourselves to finding the ways of removing
these factors if we want to prevent wars and establish world peace.
Non–violence: The Eternal Religion
Non–violence is an eternal religion but we do not accept it as such. Though violence is a negative
tendency and non–violence a positive one, for all practical purposes we have changed their places.
As a matter of fact a serious misunderstanding has arisen because of the word non–violence, since it
is taken to mean the negation of violence.. It has led people to believe that violence and not
non–violence is an unavoidable part of life. The rigmarole of violence automatically comes to an end
once non–violence is understood to be an inevitable part of life.
Problem of Non–violence
It is not difficult to prove the proposition that man has accorded full recognition to the need for and
usefulness of violence. Today thousands of scientists are busy inventing destructive weapons and
thousands upon thousands of soldiers are either undergoing training in the use of arms or staging
war rehearsals. Thus all the three activities –– research, training and practice are going on in

Examples Of Nonviolence Today
Nonviolence Today
Throughout the centuries, nonviolence has been more effective than violence. Nonviolence is still
as effective in today's world as it was in the past. Violence should never be the answer, because
nonviolence is just as effective if not more effective. Nonviolence was effective in the past during
the civil rights movements. The civil rights activist Rosa Parks became famous, and well known
for her actions, when a white bus driver told her to give up her seat to a white passenger and she
refused. This nonviolent act of defiance, led to a citywide boycott in her honor, which then helped
launch a nationwide effort to end segregation of public facilities. This quote from a biography of
Rosa Parks explains...show more content...
Today, when non violence is used, it is typically very good at succeeding. A huge supporter of non
violence resistance is the animals rights group PETA. PETA stands for People for the Ethical
Treatment of Animals. PETA has always maintained a belief of non violence. They do not allow
anyone, human or nonhuman, to be hurt during any of their nonviolence resistances. It is also
reassured here by PETA that, "No one has ever been killed throughanimal rights activity in the
United States." ("Does PETA advocate the use of violence?" peta.org) Hearing this is a great
relief. PETA is by far the largest animal rights group, and they spread all over the world. PETA
works to get their message across in non violent ways; public education, cruelty investigations,
research, animal rescue, legislation, special events, celebrity involvement, and safe protest
campaigns ("People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals" peta.org). PETA also sends undercover
agents to places such as pig farms and slaughterhouses to document research. PETA has had many
protests, but none of them are violent, many are just to grab people's attention and to try to make
them see how animal cruelty is wrong. Much of what PETA does is try to get people to buy
everything animal cruelty free, and to try to get stores to only sell cruelty free products. PETA has
also been striving to turn as many people vegetarian, or vegan, as possible because of the horrible
slaughtering going on on meat farms. Over time, PETA has helped influence vegetarian eating in the
main world, and now there are more than 12 million vegetarians in the U.S. alone. ("PETA's
Vegetarian Campaign: Taking 'Meatless' Cuisine Mainstream!" peta.org) All due to non violent
campaigns and hard work. Even in today's world, non violence

Nonviolence Vs Non Violence
Yes, nonviolence can be more dangerous than violence to a ruling class. Although the results in
both situations will be very different. Using violence may bring the result they want but it would
only be put in place because of fear. Less people could be hurt because it would bring the message
they are trying to send faster but it will be taken the wrong way. People from both sides will be
killed and the British people in India would not understand what they were doing was an injustice
that should be corrected. It would instead be seen as a hateful act brought upon the brutal Indians.
They would end up building a tense, hateful relationship with each other that will last for a long
time. The British will be justified in using physical force

Non Violence Vs Nonviolent Strategies Essay
"Non–violence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest
weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man."
–Mahatma Gandhi Mahatma Gandhi was a perfect example of what a person can accomplish when
he/she act as a pacifist. Violence is never the answer; using non–violence as a tactic to achieve justice
is more effective than using violence as a catalyst for change because nonviolent strategies allow
greater participation, opponents of those engaging in nonviolent strategies lose credibility, and the
use of nonviolent approaches are much less expensive than the use of violent strategies.
The use of Nonviolent strategies is promoted but there is so much a person can abstain until they
get to the point where they long revenge. This is especially true if the lives of the innocent are at
risk and no one does anything about it. For example, The 16th street Baptist Church bombing.
According to (History.com/Birmingham Church bombing), it was Sunday September 15,1963
members of the KKK had placed dynamite under the steps of 16th Street Baptist Church, when the
bomb went off there were girls who were in the choir getting dressed Alfaro 2 in the basement.
Among them where the four girls, Addie Mae Collins (14), Carole Denise McNair (11), Carole
Robertson (14) and Cynthia Wesley (14) who suffered a brutal death when the bombs went off.
WWW.CNN.Com...show more content...
If nonviolence were to be used as tactic people of all ages would be able to stand in the cause. Seeing
how adults and children stand up for the greater good will encourage a larger group of people to
participate. No one would encourage a child to fight and use violence. The more involvement of
people there is the louder the voice, separated we are weak and together we are strong. If we were
to use the violent tactic people are bound to get hurt and

The Practice Of Non Violence
1.The definition of non violence is a peaceful time with no hate or anger.I think that the practice of
non violence is unsuccessful because many people have tried to be non violent and there is always
something or someone who can still trigger it.Millions have tried it even countries after world war 1
and it still did not work.A person who is violent has that one thing that triggers it such as anger
toward another person.I have never met anyone that is that extreme violent and i do not think the
practice of non violence works or helps.The people that practice non violence sometimes fake their
success because they don't want people thinking that they are a terrible person and they live on that
way.People think that some people are cured by the

Nonviolence Is Better Than Non Violence
Some believe a few reasons for thinking why nonviolence could potentially be better rather than
violence is because it is less harmful to people, their country, and the world. But most times when a
war starts, it is violence that will make it come to an end. Yes, when using violence in war it is going
to harm innocent lives, and although this will happen, it will also essentially wipe out the nation you
are fighting against. Violence shouldn't ever have to be the answer, but when it comes to defending
yourself you don't have any other choice at that moment. Violent methods are better than non–violent
methods because they can end wars. The first example to prove our argument is the Holocaust. They
couldn't have been stopped using non–violent methods since the Nazis were extremely...show more
content...
In addition to this, violence is the better answer for countries to find freedom because people will
not attempt to revolt against these laws or their rulers since they are afraid of what will happen to
them if they try to rebel. Most countries use violence as solutions because they know it is the best
option for them to get their country to be the best it could be. When kings, rulers, or presidents use
nonviolent methods as their solutions they come out to have more issues because many people
come out to rebel against the rulers of their country. Most nonviolent protests like Mohandas Gandhi
and Nelson Mandela were all people that wanted to rebel against their government because they did
not like how they were being treated so they started their own rebellion so that the people that are
like them can be together to create a perfect world that they think is right. Most protests that
happened at this time did not get these people anywhere because the government often shut them
down before they could do anything to help the government and to have freedom for their people or

Essay on Violence
Violence is one of the most problematic issues society faces today, and it has been increasing day
after day, in the streets of our cities. The most common description of what violence really is can be
given as negativity towards something or someone either through physical or verbal actions, which
often causes the victim to suffer pain. The different types of violence that exist in our multi–cultural
society are out–numbered, but the most evident ones are domestic, gang, sexual, and racial violence.
While violence can definitely be reduced, it will never be eliminated due to the nature of humans.
Domestic violence, also known as spousal abuse, occurs when a person in an intimate relationship or
marriage tries to dominate and control...show more content...
On October 24 2000, a news article headline read, "Gang wars 6 Dead". This event had taken place
in Etobicoke, and the news article contained sentences like "Six victims in six months" and
"calculated executions". It also contained terms like "Bloods" and "Crips". These terms and
sentences have officially crossed the border and have become all too familiar in Canadian cities.
In order to cut back this outlaw behaviour, we need to educate our youth about the ill effects of
gangs, drugs, guns, and should try to persuade them to instead make friends with those who accept
you for who you are and use all their time in doing something positive and proactive. As a result of
reducing and preventing gang violence, many cities have created special task forces and given
schools their own police officers.
Sexual violence is another form of violence that has plagued our cities. This crime involves violence
that is specifically sexual in nature, to which the victim does not give consent. According to 2005
statistics, 51% of all Canadian women have experienced at least one incident of sexual violence. 6
out of 10 victims who reported being sexually violated were under 17. These numbers are alarming
and scary. It is extremely important to get rid of such sinister crimes in our communities because it
robs the victims of their innocence, self–esteem, confidence, and even trust in our society. The

Change Through Non-Violence
The best way to bring about change is through non–violence because violence is going to take you
nowhere. Sometimes fighting for what is right could be best for you and your community.In the
article Ghandi did not want us fighting at all. He, Gandhi just wanted what was best for us , so he
tried doing what was actually best for us. An example would be when Gandhi asked parents to
remove children from British–run schools.Still, Gandhi never supported violent means. He believed
peaceful protests worked better. Meanwhile when, Martin Luther King, Jr. fought discriminatory
laws. He led a bus boycott in Montgomery. He led boycotts against Alabama

Violence Vs Non Violence Essay
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Rather than having violent
movements and harming citizens, it is better to peacefully resist. Once a violence is used, the
resistance to the law becomes nulled. People tend to not follow a violence protester. Once a
violent riot starts, chaos is everywhere. People forget what they are truly fighting for. They
unconsciously run away with the fear of getting harmed and dare not to go back. A peaceful
resistance on the other hand leads citizens to join and support. People are able to see what they are
fighting for and their real intentions. They are able to stand and cause no problem to people passing
by as they are showing their support through silent voices. Many famous activists and leaders are for
nonviolence. Mahatma Gandhi, a primary leader of India's independence...show more content...
Blessed is the man who can perceive the law of ahimsa (nonviolence)" (Gandhi's Philosophy of
Nonviolence). He believes that violence is never the answer and that people should stay away
from it. Violence will create another violence and there would be no end. Also, the government
takes the violence resistant harshly. They ignore people who cause disturbance to the society and
to the citizens. Having a peaceful resistance, the government sees the people and consider their
resistance and try to come with a solution to satisfy their citizens. Another leader who was against
for violence is Martin Luther Kind Jr. He is one of the influential leaders in American's History. He
stated that, "I have earnestly opposed violent tension, but there is a type of constructive, nonviolent
tension which is necessary for growth" ("Letter from a Birmingham Jail [King, Jr.]"). He also
believes that "we who engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension" ("Letter
from a

Non Violence
Hear them cry yet? "An eye for an eye will only make the whole world blind."Said by Mahatma
Gandhi,who was a preeminent leader of the Indian independence movement in British–ruled India. In
my mind, violence is just a inferior product that had been produced by human relationship. Here,I
mean the bad relationship. I never find out violence can make a kind–hearted person turn into a
muderer until I was 12 years old. During that year,I read a book named Nonviolent
Communication. So after I read this book,there was a question appeared in my mind "Why
violence exist anyway?" In USA,there were a lot of school shootings happened,I don't know how
many exactly happened,but I know that must will be a big number,and there were a lot of kids and
teachers dead during each school shooting. I feel like there is something worng with US law, this is
not the main point I want to say,because I can not change the law.But actually, the spate of violent
cases are breaking our heart. Compare to other countries like UK,Australia and Canada,the frequency
of school shooting is too high,I mean as a leading industrialized nation,America...show more
content...
Isaac Asimov,who was a an American author and professor of biochemistry at Boston University.He
said "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent."When you bulling them or just walking pass
them and never care about them,ask yourself,did you think about their feeling,did you even hear
they were

Essay On Non Violence

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von Paper Writer Services

Mehr von Paper Writer Services (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Essay On Non Violence