Deductive Argument Essay

Deductively Valid Argument
A deductively valid argument is an argument in which the premises succeed in guaranteeing the
conclusion. In deductive arguments, the premises are intended to provide such strong support for
the conclusion that, if the premises were true, then it would be impossible for the conclusion to be
false. The truth of the conclusion is also contained within the truth of the premises, also supporting
its cogency. In my argument the truth of its premises guarantees the truth of its conclusion; therefore
this argument is deductively valid. This argument is also considered to be cogent because it has both
satisfactory premises (true or plausible premises) and a structure that provides rational support for its
conclusion.
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Example Of An Unsound Deductive Argument
An example of an unsound valid deductive argument from my life is that the online course at
Ashford University that I am taking is the best option for me to continue studying because I do not
have other option and is the best decision I made. (P1)–If the online course at Ashford University
that I am taking is the best option to continue studying because I do not have other option then I am
taking the best decision. (P2)– I don't have other option (C)– At least is the best decision.

Deductive Critical Thinking
INTRODUCTION
In our day to day studies, almost everything is transformed into our understanding by the creation of
arguments in our brains. An argument is basically described as a process of making what we think
clear to ourselves and others .the final goal of an argument is usually to reach a conclusion which is
sufficiently persuasive to convince someone of something. Any argument that relies on collection of
data, on measurement, on information collected somehow (rather than on a general principle) is
known as an inductive argument. On the other hand an argument which begins with a generally true
phrase to a particular phrase is known as a deductive argument.
BODY
Usually in a deductive argument, the premises are meant to provide a guarantee...show more
content...
Inductive arguments, therefore, can take vary wide ranging forms, including arguments dealing with
statistical data, generalizations from past experience appeals to signs, evidence or authority and
casual relationship. The following is an example of an inductive argument:
It has snowed in Massachusetts every December in recorded history. Therefore, it will snow in
Massachusetts this coming December.
How do inductive and deductive arguments help us in critical thinking? This is a question that needs
much insight so as to fully understand the role of inductive and deductive arguments in critical
thinking.
Critical thinking is the ability to think clearly and rationally. It includes the ability to engage in
reflective & independent thinking. So deductive and inductive arguments will help in the following
ways in critical thinking:
1.Making accurate and logic decisions.
In arguments, facts are reviewed, wrote and reviewed again. By this, it usually helps one to make
decisions accurately .arguments really helps someone to understand every single piece of
information because when you fail to understand a part of given information then it is likely to make
biased

The Deductive Argument Of Evil
The deductive argument for evil is more philosophical and packs a bigger punch, while the
evidential argument is much more convincing, but less powerful in the sense of philosophy. The
deductive argument holds four propositions, the first is that god is all knowing, the second is that
god is all powerful, the third is that god is all good, and finally the fourth is that evil exists in this
world. If God is all of those things, then why does he allow pain and suffering to occur. This is
where the evidential argument comes into play. The evidential argument holds that first, the kind of
evil that exists in the world is unexpected if God exists, and secondly if the kind of evil that exists
is not surprising if God does not exist. Therefore the

Deductive and Inductive Approaches
CHAPTER ONE
DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE APPROACHES–
A SHORT REVIEW
1.1. Definitions and names
When it comes to teaching grammar two main trends have been competing with one another for
ages, these are: deductive and inductive approaches. While the first one seems to be more successful
as it has continuously been applied since ancient times, the other was appreciated only in Classical,
Reneissance, 19th and 20th century (Johnson, 1999, p. 147). However, it seems to have gained real
popularity recently. We can observe (Johnson, 1999, p. 147), that the deductive approach was
extremaly in favour in the Middle Ages, 18th and 19th century, when reading, writing and translating
texts were regarded as the most important skills. Luckily,...show more content...
228). According to Trahey and White in these exercises " ...learners are exposed to a high–frequency
of a particular language form in the instructional input leading to better knowledge and
understanding of that form by the learners" (Lightbown & Spada., 1999, p. 131). Pupils seem
to be surrounded by the language, on the contrary in the deductive approach learners are given
selected language structures to cope with, to complete tasks based only on this particular gramatical
item. Batstone (1994) calls this type of approach "teaching grammar as product" or "form–focused
approach" and sees it as a series of controlled activities with the significant role of the teacher and a
slightly limited role of the learners (pp. 224–227). However, he does not condemn this approach, he
admits it is still a very popular one and has some advantages. As a matter of fact, Batstone agrees
with Long's opinion that "structures, notions, functions, etc." cannot "be acquired separately, singly,
in linear additive fashion" and this is the weak point of the form–focused approach, yet it provides
good knowledge of rules and reinforces students feeling of understanding the language structure and
at the same time it encourages them to continue learning. In regards to the inductive approach
Batstone calls it teaching grammar as process or meaning focused approach (pp. 224–227) and
emphasises

Deductive Reasoning
Deductive Reasoning In order to fully understand deductive reasoning, there are certain points to be
noted. First, what is the nature of deductive reasoning? Logical strength is defined as the property of
an argument whose premises, if true provide support for its conclusion. Deductive and inductive
arguments are also distinguished based on the point that logical strength is a matter of degree. This
distinction makes it necessary to understand the nature of deductive reasoning. Therefore, deductive
arguments are those whose premises guarantee the truth of the conclusion, and inductive arguments
are those whose premises make it reasonable to accept the conclusion though do not absolutely
guarantee its truth. Deductive reasoning is...show more content...
В•The logical operators also play crucial part in telling precisely how the truth of the statement as a
whole is determined by the truth values of its component statements. They also define the different
kinds of truth–functional statement as explained above. Four kinds of truth–functions: 1.It is false
that Keanu Reeves is gay. Negation – the statement p is false is true when the component statement
is false and false when the component statement is true 2.Manny Pacquiao is the world's
featherweight champion and he has not been defeated so far. Conjunction В– true if and only if both
statements are true and false it both is false or either one is false 3.Either he stole it or somebody
else stole it. Disjunction В– true when either one of the components is true or if both are true, it is
false when both are false В•It is to note that disjunction is to be considered among complex
statements. Consider the example, either Mac did it or Bud it. This statement will still be
grammatically correct if written as either Mac or Bud did it but this perhaps is merely a simple
statement containing compound subjects. В•It is also important to note that in a disjunctive
truth–function the two disjuncts are exhaustive but not exclusive. This means that the disjuncts
cannot be both false (exhaustive) but both may be true (not exclusive). 4.If one commits homicide
then he must be imprisoned. Implication В– if p then q; the first component is called the antecedent,
the second

The first concepts I learned about in this chapter are the deductive and inductive reasoning. As
developing techniques such as both deductive and inductive reasoning is an important portion of
becoming a critical thinker. So what is deductive reasoning? Deductive reasoning is structured in
such a way as to give as to give us certainty about what it true in a given situation. The conclusions
certainty is established when deductive arguments contain true premises reasons stated in the correct
form (Diestler 2012). So basically, deductive reasoning is taking some set of data or facts and using
that to come up with other deducting facts. When using deductive reasoning its sometimes knows as
the top down approach which is sometimes used for research...show more content...
Therefore, you start to think out of the box and having different opinions it can allow you to have
better decision–making skills in choosing better life choices for yourselves. In the video that was
shown during the lecture about decision–making named How To Make Better Decisions (https:/
/youtu.be/QW–AUTh6WOY) a mathematician believes he can solve complex human problems by
using math. In decision–making mathematics share the same language, in you have problems that
need to be solved. Therefore, you look at the factors that you're going away against each other so
solve the problem with using math. In the example is trying finding a suitable girlfriend using
numbers. The experiment was to see if the math could predict the volunteers which consist of the
four nerdy science guys could get numbers from girls from a bar setting. The conclusion the
volunteers were a success. Also, something that was discovered was with this simply analyzing
the decision before hand seem to have given the guys more confidence to approach and talk to
girls at the bar. The only person who was not successful was one of the guys Levi who reject the
magic numbers and failed at the experiment in this performance. I don't always think that math can
always be used, but you can if you want to make a logical decision then you make choose math to
help you with the decision–making. One thing that can helps me in making better decisions is
identifying the factors

Deductive Argument On Rhetoric
Scene: After Aristotle's funeral, some of his student's get drunk following the service, which leads to
a discussion of the line between how morality and public perception shape rhetoric.
Syllogion: If there is such a thing as a complete proof, then saying that today is a depressing day for
the world would be just that. It's almost irrefutable. Would you pass me the wine, Revolutio?
Revolutio: I don't think I will. I think you've had a little too much to drink if you believe that,
Syllogion. That's pretty funny coming from Mr. deductive argument himself. Aristotle's works were
riddled with fallacies and so is what you just said!
Syllogion: Excuse me, Revolutio? We just buried our mentor and your drunken self decides to have
a philosophical...show more content...
But maybe I should be quiet before my knowledge has you imprisoning me for slander.
Moralus: Revolutio, do you really believe that the point of Aristotle's argument was to point out the
nuances from one person to the next?
Revolutio: He clearly states that uncertainty can't solve uncertainty. How can three age groups define
the characteristics of a man? Without a defined premise, how can we create a defined argument?
Moralus: (mocking Revolutio) Aristotle said this. Aristotle said that. If we want to talk about
certainty. Who says that his teachings are

Examples Of Unsound Valid Deductive Argument
Deductive and Inductive Arguments Unsound Valid Deductive Argument Premise 1: My husband
does not work on the weekends. Premise 2: My husband was home today. Conclusion: It must be a
weekend. This argument precludes the fact that he may be home sick, or using paid time off.
Therefore, this is not a sound argument, though the premises are true, as it does not account for
other factors that may keep my husband home. Sound Valid Deductive Argument Premise 1: My
baby cries when he needs something. Premise 2: My baby is crying. Conclusion: He needs
something. This argument is sound and valid, as my baby only cries when there is something that
must be done for him, whether that be feeding, changing, playing, etc. Weak Inductive Argument

Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Deductive and inductive reasoning A deductive argument tends to work from the generalized to the
more specific. It often referred to as a top–down approach informally. The conclusions that are made
in deductive argument follow logically from the facts that are available. A deductive approach can
be taken on the statement traditional publishing has been rendered unnecessary by the rise of digital
publication. Electrical publishing which is also referred to as ePublishing or digital publishing
involves the publication of e–books, electronic articles, digital libraries and EPUBS. It is becoming
a common trend to distribute books, newspapers and even magazines directly to readers through
tablet reading devices. This has been generated by vendors who operate online like Apple iTunes
bookstore and books in the android market among others. Market researchers have made suggestions
that most of the magazines and newspapers that will be in circulation will be done through digital
means by 2015(Sader, 2004). Most of the publishing companies are also considering making
agreements with these electronic publishing networks like Apple so that they can increase the
publications through them and eventually no more traditional publishing will be done (Rothchild, I.
2006). From the look at the general trend in publishing that most people and firms are taking as
depicted above, it is safe to take the deductive conclusion that "Traditional publishing has been
rendered unnecessary by the

What Makes A Deductive Argument
With your first argument I think you should add more to your premises or add another premise to
support your conclusion. This example gives a very broad overview on alcohol related accidents.
How much was the person that got into the accident drinking. You could add a premise that states
this many percent of people drive while being legally intoxicated. I would also add for premise one
the percent of people that die in alcohol–related accidents every year or for a certain number of
years. This will make your argument stronger.
With your second argument is more of a deductive argument as premise one and two are true and the
conclusion is guaranteed. So this would be a valid deductive argument. For an inductive argument
the conclusion should

Social Media Affects Interpersonal Relationships
Introduction
The implications of social media on the ability of individuals to interact and communicate is visible
in all areas of the society. Due to the growth in technology and introduction of smart gadgets such as
smartphones, there has been a significant shift in the way people communicate. Instead of face to
face communication, people prefer communicating through the use of social media platforms. The
thesis for the paper is that social media hinders interpersonal relationship. The essay will outline facts
that support the argument, gives out some objections on the same, and finally give out a conclusion
that it is true, social media hinders interpersonal relationships.
Argument
The essay will provide a guarantee of truth on how adversely social media affects the interpersonal
relationships leading to a valid conclusion. In this deductive argument, the following premises
support the thesis that social media hinders interpersonal relationship. They include;
P1: Social media hinder relationships as it offers no face to face interaction.
P2: Social media has negative impacts on peoples' emotions and psychology. That is, it does not
provide emotional closeness provided by real interpersonal relationship.
P3: Social media also creates unrealistic expectations for relationships. It tends to manipulate the
actual psychical attributes of individuals.
P4: Social media can also invoke feelings of jealousy and stress.
C: Social media hinders relationships because it

Compare And Contrastive And Deductive Reasoning
The inductive and deductive reasoning seems dissimilar to each other from all accounts. Inductive
reasoning involves a scientist using series of correlated observations to reach or infer a conclusion
while deductive reasoning involves predicting a specific result by following existing laws and
general concepts that support a conclusion (OpenStax College, & Rice University, 2013). So,
considering the definition of inductive reasoning and the definition of deductive reasoning and their
mode of operations highlighted above, they are apparently different from each other. In comparing
and contrasting both approaches, inductive reasoning focuses on observation while deductive
reasoning considers the generally accepted facts to ascertain the authenticity of a specific case. With
the obvious difference in their modus operandi, inductive and deductive reasoning both use
hypothesis, tests, repetitions...show more content...
The two methods can, as a matter of fact, be complementary when used in experiments. In other
words, the top–down logic of the deductive reasoning can be supported by the bottom–up logic of the
inductive reasoning. In addition, it may be necessary to evaluate which approach is best for getting
the required findings. The observational approach used by inductive reasoning can be solidified by
the evidence gathered from the test results of a supported hypothesis. This, in my opinion, is what
an intelligent scientist should do when working on a specific experiment. In an attempt to find a
solution or answer tough questions regarding scientific or biological matters, it would be unwise or
unnecessary to apply rigidity in using any of the discussed methods as both are complementary to
each

Critically Evaluate the Deductive Argument from Evil
Logically, can Evil and the "three–O" God co–exist in this universe? The deductive argument from
evil says they cannot. In this essay I will explain the argument and analyze why it is valid but
unsound. I will do this by discussing fallacious nature of the premise that if God were omnipotent and
knew he could prevent the existence of evil without sacrificing some greater good he would then
necessarily prevent it. The essay will propose the following evaluation of the deductive argument
from Evil: that each premise logically follows from its antecedent, but that the concepts in the
premises themselves are not entirely understood and can be refuted. God's Omni benevolence,...show
more content...
An even further analysis of the issue of misinterpretation of Omni benevolence, or false assumptions
about God's nature, is the claim that the deductive argument from evil contains a referential fallacy;
presuming that all words refer to existing things and that their meaning lies in what the refer to.
This claim of the unsound nature of the argument asserts that the deductive argument from evil
fallaciously assumes the idea of Omni benevolence is defined by existing ideas and worldly
concepts of "all good nature". It is logically possibly, however, that God's perfect goodness is
beyond man's understanding and cannot be defined by actions or non–actions relating to the evil of
this world. Thus leading to the false conviction that God need necessarily eliminate all evil from the
world in order to be inherently good. These forms of counter arguments to the deductive explanation
of evil's non–compatibility with God can be refuted. The following are defenses for the deductive
argument that support the primary understanding of God's Omni benevolence as mandating the
elimination of all existing evil. Firstly, Omni benevolence is a description of God's absolutely
good nature and entails that God desires everything that is good. This desire to bring about good
things also means a desire to prevent evil things from happening. Hence God's good nature doesn't
need to necessarily lead to no omission of good actions, but it does lead to the necessary idea that
God

Deductive Arguments For Universal Healthcare
Final Paper Universal Healthcare
Chrystal M Bare
PHI103 Informal Logic
Instructor Christopher DeFusco Ph D.
November 24, 2017
Chosen Topic:
Should Universal Healthcare be available to all regardless of their ability to pay in the same way
that other services like education are available to all for free?
Universal Healthcare means that all individuals can use medical services as preventative, curative,
and rehabilitative care when they need it regardless of their income levels. Universal healthcare
guarantees that these services are available to everyone. The U.S. is in talks now for a single payer
system which would provide health insurance in place of private companies to bring more access to
medical to the lower class and the thousands of under or uninsured.
P1: Universal Healthcare would reduce long–term costs.
P2: Everyone has a right to see a doctor.
P3: Universal Healthcare would improve public health overall, with preventative care and overall
health management.
C: Therefore universal healthcare should be available to every person as a government funded
program.
This is a deductive argument. A deductive argument is an argument that is intended by the arguer to
be deductively valid. As the deductive arguer here I am attempting to provide the truth of the
conclusion that is provided by my arguments premises and they should be true statements.
Premise one: Universal Healthcare would reduce long–term costs.
A single–payer system would eliminate

Deductive Argument Analysis
I argued a deductive argument with my sister or what I thought was a deductive argument over
taking my niece and nephew to the orthodontist, I argued I wasn't told about the kids orthodontist
appointment and my sister said she told me weeks ago, which I have no recollection of this
conversation taking place, Deductive Validity and Language accrued because if I can't remember the
conversation taking place about the appointment for the kids. Now I see my argument is invalid and
my memory loss has everything to do with the fact my sister told me about the appointment weeks
ago, and had heard the message from the dental office giving a reminder of the appointment. I was
mad thinking that I wasn't told eve after hearing the message on the answering...show more content...
Me and my sister were on the same page after I realized I could be wrong, but she got mad that I
asked if she could gave me a reminder and she proceed to make fun that I will surely forget! I did
not at this point admit how I was wrong and could have asked to be reminded, this happened five
days ago and she is still mad at me and the appointment has come and gone and we are still at odds
over this whole misunderstanding or miscommunication. I denied the antecedent I was being so
unreasonable by being made I could have just taken the kids and not complained, my sister thought
she had told me and I did not remember being told that I needed to take the kids to a appointment.
The fallacies me and my sister argued about neither one of us where right in our argument because
the attribute did not apply to the whole situation we should have communicated better, discussed
what time the appointment was and who was going to take the kids if my sister could or couldn't get
the time off to take the kids knowing the appointments get scheduled months in

Deductive Argument
Argument 1: Is it okay for my boyfriend to not cook nor clean on his days off? Premise 1: Is it
okay for my boyfriend not cook nor clean on his days off because he deserves a break. Premise 2:
Is it okay for my boyfriend not cook nor clean on his days off because he pays rent. Conclusion:
Simply is it okay for my boyfriend not cook nor clean on his days off because he deserves a break
and he pays rent. This is a deductive argument about my boyfriend does not want to do housework
nor cooking during his days off. The strength of this argument is that the first two statements are true
and the conclusion is true too.The weakness of this argument is that both premises could be rebutted
on sexism or ignorance. All in all, my boyfriend

Inductive Argument Paper
Logic is a science originating from Aristotle, which comprises the ideologies of validity of inference
and demonstration (Merriam–Webster, n.d.). Therefore, it is a tool to interrogate and understand the
world around us, by separating the valid properties from invalid properties (Sayle, 2013). However,
it is merely a tool, and may not be the best tool for a particular situation to analyze. At its base, logic
reduces to deductive and inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning derives a conclusion from the
necessary consequence of a couple of true premises (Sayle, 2013). Moreover, inductive reasoning
comprises multiple true premises to form a valid conclusion (Sayle, 2013). Deductive reasoning
may be useful when solving simple problems with only two premises. For instance, if a car is a
vehicle and a vehicle has wheels, then a car has wheels. The benefit to this is that an invalid form of
the argument is easy to identify, when two true premises lead to a false conclusion (Sayle,...show
more content...
The format for this has multiple premises that tend to logically lead to a universal catchall. However,
it is impossible to properly determine if the inductive argument is truly valid, since the premises and
conclusion are a relation of patterns. For example, the sky is typically blue in the daytime, and since
it is daytime, the sky must be blue without having to physically look. In fact, this is incorrect, since it
can be raining, or cloudy during the day. Although the form follows inductive reasoning, it is hard to
prove the previous statement incorrect, without prior knowledge of the situation. As a result,
inductive reasoning is not entirely valuable, since the validity of the conclusion is unreliable.
Additionally, with Aristotelian logic, thetruth of the premise implies the truthful conclusion, which
the Russell Paradox contradicts to an extent (Sayle,

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Deductive Method
Strengths and weaknesses of Deductive and Inductive grammar teaching Erlam (2003) defines the
deductive method as a process that moves from general to specific. The learners are exposed to the
general use, and they apply the rule to particular examples of language use. And this method ismost
close with the Grammar–Translation approach (Gollin, 1998). This approach, according to Brinton,
Celce– Murcia and Snow (2014) was used as a way to teach Latin and other languages. This
Approach has some elements, which are as follows: – The focus is on grammatical parsing. – Using
the native language of the students. – Little use of the target language for communication. – Atypical
exercise is to translate sentences from the target language into the mother tongue. The Deductive
method is related to conscious learning. This method tries to place a great emphasis on error
correction and presentation of explicit rules. The deductive method is often used with adult learners.
The teacher in this method teaches the rule explicitly to learners, and they are ready to cope with
exercises given (Krashen, 2002). The deductive method has its own strengths and weaknesses,
according to Widodo (2006), which are in the following table: Strengths 1–The Deductive approach
goes straight forwardly to the point and time–saving. The positive aspect of the method is that it
saves time. Teacher's explanations, independent work and subsequent checks are effective methods
for learning facts and developing basic skills (Allahyar and Ramezanpour, 2011, p. 240–243;
Entwistle, 1998, p.225–258). 2– A number of rule aspects (for example, form) can be more simply
and clearly explained than elicited from examples. 3– A number of direct practice/application
examples are immediately given. 4– The deductive approach respects the intelligence and maturity of
many adult learners in particular and acknowledges the role of cognitive processes in language
acquisition. 5–It confirms many learners' expectations about classroom learning, particularly for
those who have an analytical style. Weaknesses 1– Beginning the lesson with a grammar
presentation may be off putting for some Learners, especially younger ones. 2– Younger learners
may not be able to

Deduction Vs Deductive Reasoning
Induction and deduction are pervasive elements in critical thinking. They are also somewhat
misunderstood terms. Arguments based on experience or observation are best expressed inductively,
while arguments based on laws or rules are best expressed deductively. Most arguments are mainly
inductive. In fact, inductive reasoning usually comes much more naturally to us than deductive
reasoning. Deductive reasoning that is based on a general statement of fact is hard to argue with.
When using this method, you begin with a factual statement that describes a class of things, such as
animals. "In deductive inference, we hold a theory and based on it we make a prediction of its
consequences. That is, we predict what the observations should be if the...show more content...
Once this step has been completed, the next step involves coding the data for statistical analysis in
which the results are supported with theories. The important item that makes inductive profiling
more robust than deductive profiling is, through research observable patterns in the data can be
found that lead to new theories. Rather than being stagnated with held views of behavior, inductive
profiling is like a revolving door – researchers are always striving to look for emerging patterns in
crime data, which leads to new ways to assist

Deductive Argument Essay

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von Paper Writer Services

Mehr von Paper Writer Services (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Deductive Argument Essay