Automation of business-to-business (B2B) payments continues to remain elusive. While checks are stubbornly pervasive, there is promising news in the vision for processing data and dollars among business partners. This session will detail NACHA and other industry organizations’ initiatives leading the way in facilitating the move from paper instruments to electronic payments by mid-sized and smaller businesses. Learn about opportunities for electronic disruption and where financial institutions might begin to gain traction in B2B ACH payments.
4. State of the Market in B2B Payments
4
Primary Payment Methods
50% -60%
of businesses
receive and pay
with checks
Source: 2013 AFP Electronic
Payments Survey + 2012
Federal Reserve Electronic
Payments & Remittance
Data Survey
8%
3%
3%
26%
60%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Don't know
Other
Mainly card
Mainly ACH
Mainly check
SOURCE: "Electronic Payments & Remittance Data: Pain Points & Solutions," Federal Reserve Banks
(Remittance Coalition), 2012
+ 2015 AFP Payments Fraud and Control Survey
77% of companies
are target of check
fraud
5. 5
The Paper Chase in A/P Operations
Hidden Costs Opportunity Costs
› Overlooked costs of checks: long‐term storage fees
(onsite and / or offsite), bank fees, reissuance fees,
etc.
› Productivity / Efficiency – data processing errors;
time consumption e.g., duplicate work, investigation
into errors, reprocessing payments, missed deadlines
› Lack of visibility audit issues
› Improved cash cycles – cost of not knowing
outstanding invoices
› Missed early payment discounts
› Expertise refocused in other areas
6. 6
Difficult to obtain banking
information for suppliers and
sharing banking information
with customers
Reasons Cited for the Paper Jam
Small to midsize business
partners do not have the
resources to adopt e-
solutions. We're looking
into solutions to assist
[them with] automation
Internal constraints
- resources, both IT
and finance, to
devote to
implementation of
new methods
It [check] isn’t
broken
Source: Nasreen Quibria, “Global Payments,”
Aberdeen Group, May 2010
7. Roadblocks to e-Payments
7
22%
24%
26%
28%
34%
44%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Loss of check float
Lack of integration between electronic
payment and A/P systems
Satisfaction with checks; no need to
convert to ePayments
Supplier resistance to providing bank
account information
Shortage of IT resources
Suppliers not willing to adopt electronic
payments
Source: Electronic Supplier Payments Report, PayStream Advisors, Q1 2015
Barriers to Electronic B2B Payments Adoption
8. ACH is the Most Loved Payment Type!
8
22%
34%
23%
38%
42%
36%
39%
42%
28%
54%
7%
22%
19%
34%
13%
19%
18%
15%
36%
25%
71%
18%
17%
9%
9%
13%
15%
19%
6%
4%
International payments
Better fraud protection ability
Duplicate payment avoidance
Better working capital management
Ease of integration with A/P system
Better / complete remittance information
Supplier acceptance
Better data security
Convenience; ease of use
Less costly
Wire P-Card ACH
54%
of businesses
consider ACH
payments to be
less costly
Source: Electronic Supplier Payments Report, PayStream Advisors, 2015
ACH
10. 10
Some Promising Shifts in Trends
Source: Nasreen Quibria, “Global Payments,” Aberdeen Group, May 2010 Source: “Electronic Supplier Payments Report,” PayStream Advisors,
Q1 2015
11%
43%
45%
59%
57%
11%
9%
5%
32%
46%
46%
36%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Paper Checks
Wire Transfers
Commercial Cards
ACH
Increased Decreased Stayed the Same
Then… Now…
5%
18%
53%
73%
72%
8%
6%
3%
23%
74%
41%
23%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Paper Checks
Wire Transfers
P-Cards
ACH
Increased Decreased Stayed the Same
ePayments
Rising!
11. 11
Payment
Method
Average cost
per transaction*
Wire transfer $9.86
Paper check $7.15
ACH $4.72
Commercial
card
$3.96
Timing
Settlement
Speed
Remittance
Data
Risk
Immediate Immediate
Primarily
manual
(email, fax)
› Final
(irrevocable)
› Low
Determined
by buyer
Varies
Complete via
paper - manual
› Bounced check
› High
Scheduled
by buyer
1-2 days (batch)
Primarily
manual
(email, fax)
› NSF
› Low
At time of
purchase
24-48 hours (batch)
(real-time
authorization)
Electronic
delivery - L2, L3
data
› Chargeback
› Moderate
Source: Nasreen Quibria, “Global Payments,”
Aberdeen Group, May 2010
Finding the Optimal Payments Mix
*NOTE: A/P all-in cost from invoice processing to
settlement
Speed Accuracy Visibility Efficiency
Accounts Payable Finance Operation (A/R and A/P)
12. 12 Information Classification: Confidential
Steps to Optimizing A/P Electronic Payments
1. Calculate all processing costs
2. Implement robust processes for managing banking information
3. Create tool to track key suppliers and progress
4. Segment and prioritize targeted suppliers (e.g. high volume invoices,
high $ value or high pain processing)
5. Launch campaign with targeted parties: mail, telephone, and email
6. Analyze the results – quantify the savings / efficiencies
12
13. 13 Information Classification: Confidential
Steps to Optimizing A/R Electronic Payments
1. Calculate all processing costs
2. Ensure your bill is clear and identifies key payment information
3. Create clear and simple remittance instructions to provide to clients
(include acceptable payment types, bank instructions, key remittance fields)
4. Create tool to track key clients and progress
5. Segment and prioritize targeted customers (e.g. high volume
invoices, high $ value or high pain processing)
6. Launch campaign with targeted parties: mail, telephone, and email
7. Consider discounts for preferred payment type
8. Analyze the results – quantify the savings / efficiencies
13
14. 14 Information Classification: Confidential
Corporate Toolbox
14
HIGH
HIGH
Cost
Savings
Early
Payment
Discounts
Rebates
A VARIETY OF SOLUTIONS
Level of
Automation
Strategic Importance
$ Ticket
Size
Dynamic
Discounting
• Solicit electronic
payments with each
new supplier /
customer
• One time / ongoing
campaigns
• Identify third parties
that can increase
electronic payments for
A/P
– Rebates via card or
supplier pay models
18. 18
74%
of businesses
deliver remittance
information via
email
Battling Manual Processes
SOURCE: 2013 AFP Electronic Payments Survey
3%
6%
6%
10%
15%
18%
37%
74%
Other
Customer's website
Organization's website
Third-party website
Fax
Regular mail
EDI / CTX transmission
Email
Businesses Method of Sending Remittance Information
19. 19 Information Classification: Confidential
Electronic Invoice Presentment & Payment
(EIPP) Models
19
• Supplier controls customer
data and experience
• Enables cross-sell/
marketing
• Allows customers to
initiate payment online
• Provides opportunity for
more predictable cash
flow, and improved cash
flow forecasting
• Reduced DSO
• Offers potential for
automated AR update
• Low implementation costs
• Supplier may offer
incentives to enroll
• Supplier responsible for all
start-up and operational costs
• Must convince payers to
participate
• May have integration issues
with payers’ AP
BENEFITS
Supplier
Buyer
CHALLENGES
SELLER (Supplier)
DIRECT
• Enhances dispute
functionality
• Can automate review,
routing, and approval
• Payer must access many
supplier websites
• AP integration
• Compliance with supplier
payment options
20. 20 Information Classification: Confidential
Electronic Invoice Presentment & Payment
(EIPP) Models
20
• Provides opportunity for
more predictable cash
flow, and improved
forecasting
• Reduced DSO
• Seller may need to send
data to many buyer
websites
• Must integrate AR
• Compliance with buyer
payment options
• Requires process change
or programming for the
Seller
BENEFITS
Supplier
Buyer
CHALLENGES
• Buyer controls EIPP
application
• Ability to integrate internal
systems – notably AP
• Automates review, routing,
and approval
• Enhances dispute
functionality
• Buyer is responsible for
most costs
• Must convince sellers to
participate
BUYER (Payer)
DIRECT
21. 21 Information Classification: Confidential
Electronic Invoice Presentment & Payment
(EIPP) Models
21
• Reduces number of
trading partner sites
• Leverages shared
infrastructure, common
processes and services
• Seller can present
electronically with minimal
resources
• Automates review, routing,
and approval
• Enhances dispute
functionality
• Provides opportunity for
more predictable cash
flow, reduced DSO, and
improved forecasting
• Potential for automated
AR/AP update
• Must convince trading
partners to participate
• Compliance with
consolidator enrollment,
presentment and
(potentially) payment
processes
• Integration of AR/AP with
consolidator
• Non electronic invoices
BENEFITS
Supplier
Buyer
CHALLENGES
CONSOLIDATOR