Pauri Garhwal Call Girls đ„° 8617370543 Service Offer VIP Hot Model
Â
Audience segmentation 2011
1. Audience segmentationMapping the charity engagement landscape in Great Britain Patrick Brennan, Research Director Caterina Violi, Senior Researcher 30th June 2011 Tel: 0044 20 7426 8888 Email: Caterina.Violi@nfpsynergy.net Web: www.nfpsynergy.net
2. Outline What is audience segmentation? The CAM segmentation Six key audiences Lifestyle and Community Givers Super Givers Charity Start-Outers Super Doers Unengaged Junior Super Doers Six key actions
3. Outline What is audience segmentation? The CAM segmentation Six key audiences Lifestyle and Community Givers Super Givers Charity Start-Outers Super Doers Unengaged Junior Super Doers Six key actions
4. What is audience segmentation? A way to classify audiences into ânaturalâ groups on the basis of their attitudes and behaviour that allows organisations to... Understand attitudinal and behavioural (not just demographic) differences across audiences Identify opportunities and challenges of engaging different audiences Make fundraising/ recruitment efforts more efficient by prioritising investment in acquisition/ retention of certain audiences accordingly Tailor communications to different audiences on the basis of what may motivate them to engage with charities
5. The CAM segmentation An overall segmentation of the British publicâs engagement with charities Motivations for supporting charities Levels and drivers of trust in charities Favourite charity categories Actual and considered giving, volunteering and campaigning behaviour Based on statistical techniques - cluster and factor analysis Considers engagement from all angles â monetary giving, campaigning, volunteering Allows you to see where your own key audiences may fit in the big picture However, segmentation techniques are also applicable to more specific audiences (e.g. current supporters, volunteers etc.) and nfpSynergy can help you with this
6. Outline What is audience segmentation? The CAM segmentation Six key audiences Lifestyle and Community Givers Super Givers Charity Start-Outers Super Doers Unengaged Junior Super Doers Six key actions
15. Last month took part in a coffee morning raising funds for a cancer charity and sponsored her nephew running the Paris marathon for an Overseas Aid and Development charity âIâve supported certain charities simply because they have asked me toâ Lifestyle and community givers : 15%
16. A little bit to everyone? Lifestyle and community givers do not give much more than average but give to a higher number of charities On average Lifestyle and Community Givers have donated ÂŁ50.2 to charity in the last three months, only slightly above the national average of ÂŁ42.1 Have you donated to any charities in the last 3 months? Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
17. They have the broadest spectrum of interest in terms of causes âI feel strongly about a number of issues and look for charities that address theseâ â 42% When you think about your favourite charities, which category do they fall in to? Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
18. They are big on âlifestyleâ giving - e.g. charity shops, products that include a charitable donation, raffles and events In which of the following ways did you give? Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
19. Localism and personal contact with the charity are key factors for trust among Lifestyle and Community Givers What makes you likely to trust a particular charity? Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
20. Campaigning Join a charity on a social network website More likely to respond to easy involvement actions Giving products that include a donation Give to the highest number of charities; transactional giving volunteering Less likely than average to volunteer trust Average levels of Trust in charities Local charities Newspapers Armed forces causes Support the broadest range of causes
21. When communicating with Lifestyle and Community Givers... Strengths They are open to supporting a wide variety of causes They can be accessed by tapping into their relationship with the local community (e.g. events sponsorship) Weaknesses Potentially low levels of loyalty to specific causes and charity brands What they get back from their relationship with charities may be as important as what they give Therefore charities need to understand them as consumers as much as they need to understand them as donors (e.g. how do they shop?)
22. When communicating with Lifestyle and Community Givers... Opportunities They may still support a cause that is not top of their favourite causes list if asked in the right way Offering a regular giving product with a âtransactionalâ component (e.g. weekly lottery, cards for many occasions)? Offering a âtransactionalâ volunteering product (e.g. free access to heritage sites across the country when volunteering for a heritage and conservation charity)? Threats Their engagement may be vulnerable to life-style changes They are a challenging group to develop a long term relationship with that centres around the cause Hard to retain if asked to give in ways that offer bigger and better rewards by other charities and/or they come across a charity working on one of the many causes they are interested in
29. Is a member of the National Trust and gives ÂŁ 20 a month to Oxfam by direct debit
30. He writes a check to his local hospice every Christmas âI feel strongly about a number of issues and I look for charities that address theseâ Super givers: 9%
31. Super givers are the most likely to give and give the highest amounts Have you donated to any charities in the last 3 months? In total, approximately how much money have you donated to any charities in the last 3 months? Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
32. They are more likely to give in âtraditionalâ and regular/committed ways Have you given time as a volunteer to an organisation in the last 3 months? Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
33. Super givers (like Super doers) are almost twice as likely than average to be regular worshippers Do you consider yourself to be a regular worshipper/churchgoer? Yes Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
34. Super givers are the most likely segment to be talking with friends and family about writing a will In the last couple of months, have you spoken with friends and family about any of the following topics? Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
35. Campaigning Writing to MPs, companies Attending meetings More likely to consider âcommittedâ actions Giving High fundraising standards and longevity of the brand are important for trust Traditional ways of giving, regular giving Most likely to give, and give the most volunteering Average levels of volunteering trust Higher levels of trust in charities Royal family The Church Armedforces causes Support traditional causes Overseas aid Cancer
36. When communicating with Super Givers... Strengths Sense of loyalty to the cause underpinned by strong feelings about the issues they choose to support High levels of trust in charities to spend their donations wisely underpins high levels of monetary giving Weaknesses Their high level of involvement with charities through giving is not yet reflected in volunteering or campaigning When it comes to financial support, it is hard to predict what their âsaturationâ threshold is for supporting a new charity or increasing donations to existing ones
37. When communicating with Super Givers... Threats Opportunities Regular church/religious worship may be a strong driver behind this groupâs giving behaviour and it is likely to be generational rather than life-stage related factor With the gradual decline of worship behaviour across generations this group may be shrinking They look to support charities working on issues that are important to them, therefore Hospices, Rescue Services, Overseas Aid and Development, Environment, Elderly and faith based charities are well placed to communicate with them Promoting the longevity of a brand and its sense of establishment may help engage/retain them in appropriate circumstances Potential to engage them in campaigning through high involvement actions They are the right group to target for legacy ask
45. Doesnât have much time for volunteering but happily gives ÂŁ 5 a month by Direct Debit to her favourite children charity âI trust charities to spend their donations wisely a great dealâ Charity start-outers: 29%
46. Charity Start-Outersare less likely to engage in many of the standard ways but more likely than average to give by SO/DD On average Charity Start-Outers donated ÂŁ36.2 to charity in the last three months, slightly below the national average of ÂŁ42.1 In which of the following ways did you give? Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
47. They also have the highest levels of trust in charities to spend their donations wisely across all segments When you think about charities in general how much do you trust them to spend a donation wisely? Please choose the one that most represents your views. Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
48. Campaigning Telling someone about the campaign Highest levels of consideration for âlowâ involvement campaigning activities Giving More responsive to ânon intrusiveâ methods More likely to be annoyed by face-to face fundraising Longevity and brand awareness are important Average likelihood of giving and below average size of donations ...but more likely to donate by DD/SO volunteering Lower than average levels of volunteering trust Highest levels of trust in charities causes Charities Less likely to support disability, health, hospices, homelessness
49. When communicating with Charity Start-Outers Strengths Weaknesses A sizeable minority are already engaged through a regular (albeit low) level of commitment to supporting charities through SO/DD Highest levels of trust in charities to spend their donations wisely They are not particularly engaged with charities all round and there may be a danger of relying on their inertia to carry on supporting charities through SO/DD There is no particular favourite cause that stands out for this group and some causes are âlessâ preferred than average (e.g. disability, health, hospices, homelessness)
50. When communicating with Charity Start-Outers Opportunities Asking them to upgrade their DD/SO donation and get more value out of their current commitment Strengthening their all-round engagement (e.g. through easy involvement campaigning actions) Capitalising on awareness and longevity of a brand which are key drivers of trust for this group and may be an important short-cut when choosing who to support Threats Mitigating the âintrusiveâ nature of certain fundraising methods (e.g. F2F) may be important to avoid alienating this group
56. Volunteers once a week at the local hospice and has recently written to her MP to support the campaign of her favourite disability charity
57. Often talks with friends about her favourite charities and their campaigns
58. Is more likely to trust charities with whom she has had contact and those which are based in her local areaâpersonal experience of the charity drives my decision to support themâ Super doers: 11%
59. Super Doers (like Super Givers) are almost twice as likely than average to be regular worshippers Do you consider yourself to be a regular worshipper/churchgoer? Yes
60. They are the âsuper volunteersâ - all have volunteered in the past three months Almost half of people in this group (48%)volunteer twice a month or more often Have you given time as a volunteer to an organisation in the last 3 months? Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
61. Super Doersâall round engagement with charities is reflected in their topics of conversation In the last couple of months, have you spoken with friends and family about any of the following topics? Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
62. Super Doers are highly active when it comes to campaigning â they are more likely than average to have taken any campaigning actions, particularly the more âinvolvedâ ones Which of the following activities have you done, or would you consider doing, if you were asked by a charity you support? Have done in the last 3 months/ more than 3 months ago Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
63. Super doers also engage more than average with charities financially Have you donated to any charities in the last 3 months? In total, approximately how much money have you donated to any charities in the last 3 months? Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
64. Personal contact with a charity is the main and most distinctive reason for Super Doers to trust a charity and locality also plays an important role What makes you likely to trust a particular charity? Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
65. Campaigning Writing to MPs, companies Highest levels of âhighâ involvement campaigning activities Giving More likely to be annoyed by fundraising letters and appeals Higher than average on most donation methods volunteering More likely to be frequent volunteers trust Higher than average levels of trust in charities Royal family Charities causes
66. When communicating with Super Doers... Strengths They are the most âwell-roundedâ type of supporters among all the other segments, with high levels of engagement with charities on many frontsâ giving, volunteering and campaigning Their high levels of engagement are founded on high levels of trust on how charities spend their donations They are the most âresilientâ segment when it comes to expectations about size of future donations Weaknesses They are a core, but still relatively small group (11%) whose âincidenceâ could be amplified
67. When communicating with Super Doers... Opportunities Likely to be warm to supporting a variety of strands of a charityâs work, none of which are mutually exclusive for them Many of them engage with charities at a community level, therefore charities that are able to promote their local credentials may have an advantage in getting the attention of this group With their high levels of involvement in the local community and personal ties they could champion charities locally and encourage other people to get involved Threats They canât be taken for granted - they are a core minority which needs to be nurtured over long periods of time and might be difficult to replace overnight Donor/volunteer care is key
75. Doesnât really have a favourite charity but if he had to choose he would give to an animal charity âI donât trust charities to spend their donations wiselyâ Unengaged: 19%
76. The unengaged are the least likely to have given in any of the ways prompted Only 39% of the Unengaged have given to charity in the last three months and on average have given substantially less (ÂŁ 12.70) In which of the following ways did you give? Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
77. They are the most likely to say that they are expecting to cut charitable giving spend over the course of the year ahead Do you expect to cut back on your spending in any of the following areas in the next 12 months? - Giving to charity
78. They have the lowest level of trust in charities across all segments When you think about charities in general how much do you trust them to spend a donation wisely? Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
79. Campaigning Less likely to be involved in any campaigning activity Giving Less likely to give, give substantially smaller amounts volunteering Less likely to volunteer More likely than average to say that they do not trust charities to spend donations wisely trust causes Less likely to say they have a favourite charity
80. When communicating with the Unengaged... Strengths They are a relatively small group â less than one in five members of the GB public Weaknesses Highly sceptical â they have the lowest levels of trust in charities spending their donations wisely Least engaged audience in general, not only in relation to charities (e.g. less likely to read newspapers, to talk about any of the topics prompted with friends, to trust any institution)
81. When communicating with the Unengaged Opportunities There appear to be very few opportunities with this group Perhaps with the exception of easy/ low commitment campaigning actions (e.g. petition signing) this group should be the lowest priority for charities when it comes to acquisition Threats They are the most pessimistic with respect to future donations Therefore even if successfully recruited for monetary giving they may be a hard group to retain
87. Recently ran the Race for Life in memory of her aunt who died of cancer
88. Is thinking of joining a student campaigning group when she starts university next year âEvents in my life determine which charities I donate toâ Junior super doers: 17%
89. Junior super doers have higher than average consideration for most campaigning actions, including some high involvement ones (e-mailing/ writing to MP) Which of the following activities have you done, or would you consider doing, if you were asked by a charity you support? Would consider doing Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
90. Their interest in politics goes hand in hand with higher consideration for campaigning actions In the last couple of months, have you spoken with friends and family about any of the following topics? Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
91. Junior super doers are slightly more likely to give than average but give lower amounts Have you donated to any charities in the last 3 months? In total, approximately how much money have you donated to any charities in the last 3 months? Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
92. They are generally less likely than average to give via any methods prompted, apart from âad hocâ ones (e.g. on street cash collection, events, raffles) In which of the following ways did you give? Base: 1000 adults 16+, Britain; 1 = 157, 2= 88, 3= 299, 4= 112, 5= 194, 6=170 Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Jan 10, nfpSynergy
93. Campaigning Telling someone about the campaign Writing to MPs, companies Highest levels of âeasyâ involvement in campaigning activities + higher consideration of more involved ones Giving More likely to be annoyed by face-to face fundraising Slightly more likely to have given in the past three months but lower amounts than average volunteering Lower than average volunteering External endorsement by celebrities and corporate is a key driver of trust trust higher than average levels of trust in charities Charities causes Cancer
94. When communicating with Junior Super Doers... Strengths They are a slightly younger group which, if appropriately nurtured, can become tomorrowâs givers They show high consideration for âinvolvedâ campaigning actions (e.g. writing/e-mailing MPs) Weaknesses They are currently high frequency but low value in terms of donations and, given their life-stage, they are likely to remain so for a period of time
95. When communicating with Junior Super Doers... Opportunities Specific opportunities for Children and Cancer charities which are among their favourites charity categories Potential for initiating a long term relationship with this group, starting with campaigning and developing their involvement on other fronts (e.g. monetary giving) in later stages of life Finding the corporate and celebrity partnerships that are relevant to this audience may be key to earn their trust Threats A potentially risky investment as the timeframe for development into âsuper doersâ is long and the return on investment (especially when it comes to monetary donations) may not be immediate
96. Outline What is audience segmentation? The CAM segmentation Six key audiences Lifestyle and Community Givers Super Givers Charity Start-Outers Super Doers Unengaged Junior Super Doers Six key actions
97. ConclusionsSix key actions Super Doers Develop them as charity champions within their communities Super Givers Ensure their monetary involvement continues beyond life (legacies) and develop them as âdoersâ Charity Start-Outers Upgrade their regular giving and gradually engage them in âdoing (e.g. low involvement campaigning actions ) Lifestyle and Community Givers Build a relationship centred around the ârightâ giving product rather than the cause Current engagement Unengaged A relatively cold and therefore low priority audience Junior Super Doers Make campaigning the starting point of a relationship that lasts a lifetime
120. The extent to which people trust charities to spend their donation wisely
121. Factors that make people more likely to trust a particular charity (e.g. Having heard of the name of the charity, the charity being around for a long time etc)
Hinweis der Redaktion
â naturalâ groups =segmentsâattitudinal differencesâ= what motivates them to support and trust charities
2 overarching levels â giving and doing; doing is further divided between âcampaigningâ and âvolunteeringâ One unengaged group on all fronts â around one in 5 Two very highly engaged groups â one standing out for high levels and commitment in giving (Super-givers); another standing out for being engaged on the giving side but also through volunteering and campaigningTwo groups which are currently not more engaged than average but that could be moved along the supporter journey on the giving and doing side (Potential super-givers and young potential super doers)One group giving frequently, to a high number of charities and choosing methods that are transactional â i.e. In which charitable giving is a by-product of another action that benefits them in its own sake â e.g. Buying from charity shops