Your name • ID 12345678
Wonderfully creative title goes here
What is this job and where? [Job you think you want] in [city where you’d like to work].
What the job entails. Blah blah blah blah blah. All the sections below should be written in your
own words. If you quote something, it should go in quotes with a citation. Here are two ways to
cite within a paper. You can quote something, followed by the citation. For example: “This
advertising gig is about making ideas come to life” (Robbs & Morrison, 2008, p. 3). Or you can
start with the authors then follow with the quote. For example: Robbs and Morrison (2008) said,
“This advertising gig is about making ideas come to life” (p. 3). See note below in sample
references about APA Style.
What I like about it. If you paraphrase something that someone else writes, you should still cite
it but you don’t need the page number. For example: I can see how making ideas come to life
would be a great advertising job (Robbs & Morrison, 2008). Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.
What I don’t like about it. Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.
What would help get me there. Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.
Why I think this fits my personality. Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.
Sources: (Note: The first source is recommended. The other is just to show .
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Your name • ID 12345678 Wonderfully creative title goes he.docx
1. Your name • ID 12345678
Wonderfully creative title goes here
What is this job and where? [Job you think you want] in [city
where you’d like to work].
What the job entails. Blah blah blah blah blah. All the sections
below should be written in your
own words. If you quote something, it should go in quotes with
a citation. Here are two ways to
cite within a paper. You can quote something, followed by the
citation. For example: “This
advertising gig is about making ideas come to life” (Robbs &
Morrison, 2008, p. 3). Or you can
start with the authors then follow with the quote. For example:
Robbs and Morrison (2008) said,
“This advertising gig is about making ideas come to life” (p. 3).
See note below in sample
references about APA Style.
What I like about it. If you paraphrase something that someone
else writes, you should still cite
it but you don’t need the page number. For example: I can see
how making ideas come to life
would be a great advertising job (Robbs & Morrison, 2008).
Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah blah blah blah blah blah
3. blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
blah.
Sources: (Note: The first source is recommended. The other is
just to show APA Style.)
Robbs, Brett and Morrison, Deborah (2008). Idea industry: How
to crack the advertising career code. New York:
One Club Publishing.
Williams, Robin (2013). How to pretend you work in an ad
agency on TV. New York: The Crazy Ones Publishing.
Note to students: I recommend you use APA style. For help with
how to cite and reference sources, go to
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/.
Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources
Source type What is it? Examples Best used for
Scholarly
A source written by scholars or academics in a
field. The purpose of many scholarly sources is
to report on original research or
experimentation in order to make such
information available to the rest of the
scholarly community. The audience for
scholarly sources is other scholars or experts
in a field. Scholarly sources include references
and usually use language that is technical or at
a high reading level.
4. *Note: Different databases may define
“scholarly” in slightly different ways, and thus
a source that is considered “scholarly” in one
database may not be considered “scholarly” in
another database. The final decision about
the appropriateness of a given source for a
particular assignment is left to the instructor.
Scholarly Journals
• Journal of Management Information
Systems
• American Journal of Public Health
• Early Childhood Research Quarterly
Scholarly Books (published by a university
press or other high-quality publisher)
• Shari’a Politics: Islamic Law and
Society in the Modern World
• The Grand Design: Strategy and the
U.S. Civil War
• The Hidden Mechanics of Exercise:
Molecules That Move Us
Journal articles:
• Recent research on a topic
• Very specific topics or narrow
fields of research
5. • NOT good for an introduction to
or broad overview of a topic
Books:
• In-depth information and research
on a topic
• Putting a topic into context
• Historical information on a topic
Peer Reviewed
A publication that has gone through an official
editorial process that involves review and
approval by the author’s peers (experts in the
same subject area). Many (but not all)
scholarly publications are peer reviewed.
*Note: even though a journal is peer reviewed,
some types of articles within that journal may
not be peer reviewed. These might include
editorials or book reviews.
**Note: some publications (such as some
trade journals) can be peer reviewed but not
scholarly. This is not common.
See “Scholarly Journals” above
Books go through a different editorial process
and are not usually considered to be “peer
reviewed”. However, they can still be
excellent scholarly sources.
6. See above
Credible
A source that can be trusted to contain
accurate information that is backed up by
evidence or can be verified in other trusted
sources. Many types of sources can fall into
this category.
*Note: The final decision about the
appropriateness of a given source for a
particular assignment is left to the instructor.
See above. Also:
• Newspapers
• Magazines
• Books
• Trade journals or publications
• Government websites
• Websites from educational
institutions (like universities)
• Websites or other publications from
reputable organizations (like the Mayo
Clinic)
7. • Encyclopedias (general or subject)
Many websites could be considered credible.
The more information provided about the
source, the more likely they are to be credible.
Look for information about the author and/or
the organization, how recently it was
published, the intended audience, the
intended purpose, and whether there is
evidence of bias.
• Basic/general/background
information about a topic
• Current events
• Local news
• Statistical data
• Information about specific
organizations or companies (look
at the organization’s or company’s
website, or look for articles in
newspapers or trade journals)
• Government information
• Information about popular culture
• Opinions or commentaries
• Topics of general interest
8. Ashford University Library, June 2015, CR 0130415
2/21/2019
https://ashford.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/2915/preview
https://ashford.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/2915/preview
1/3
Description:
Total Possible Score: 10.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively describes each of the potential
emotional outcomes of the appraisal.
Proficient - Describes each of the potential emotional outcomes
of the appraisal. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Somewhat describes each of the potential emotional
outcomes of the appraisal. Several details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the potential
emotional outcomes of the appraisal; however, each emotional
outcome
was not addressed and many details are missing.
Non-Performance - The description of potential emotional
9. outcomes is either nonexistent or lacks the components
described in
the assignment instructions.
Distinguished - Thoroughly explains how to address each
emotion that the employee had to benefit the employee.
Provides
relevant examples of each emotion to benefit the employee.
Proficient - Explains how to address each emotion that the
employee had to benefit the employee. Provides examples of
each
emotion to benefit the employee. The explanation is slightly
underdeveloped.
Basic - Somewhat explains how to address each emotion that the
employee had to benefit the employee. Provides few examples
of each emotion to benefit the employee. The explanation is
underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Minimally explains how to address each
emotion that the employee had to benefit the employee. Fails to
provide examples of each emotion to benefit the employee. The
explanation is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The explanation of how to address each
different emotion that the employee had to benefit the employee
is
either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
assignment instructions.
Distinguished - Thoroughly explains how to address each
emotion that the employee had to benefit the organization.
Provides
10. relevant examples of each emotion to benefit the organization.
Proficient - Explains how to address each emotion that the
employee had to benefit your organization. Provides examples
of
each emotion to benefit the organization. The explanation is
slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Somewhat explains how to address each emotion that the
employee had to benefit your organization. Provides few
example of each emotion to benefit the organization. The
explanation is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Minimally explains how to address each
emotion that the employee had to benefit your organization.
Fails
to provide examples of each emotion to benefit the
organization. The explanation is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The explanation of how to address each
different emotion that the employee had to benefit the
organization
is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
assignment instructions.
Distinguished - Creates meaningful correlations among
experiences outside of the classroom to deepen understanding of
field of
study and to broaden own viewpoints.
Proficient - Compares life experiences and academic knowledge
to distinguish differences and similarities while acknowledging
perspectives other than own.
Basic - Recognizes correlation between life experiences,
11. academic texts, and ideas perceived as similar and related to
own
interests.
Below Expectations - Briefly comments about connections
between life experiences and academic texts.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the instructions.
Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively explains in detail
the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information
necessary for a full understanding.
MGT425.W3A1.04.2013
Describes the Potential Emotional Outcomes Total: 2.00
Explains How to Address Each Emotion to Benefit the
Employee Total: 3.00
Explains How to Address the Emotions of the Employee to
Benefit the
Organization
Total: 3.00
Integrative Learning: Connections to Experience Total: 0.40
Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues Total: 0.40
2/21/2019
https://ashford.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/2915/preview
12. https://ashford.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/2915/preview
2/3
Proficient - Clearly explains in detail the issue to be considered,
delivering enough relevant information for an adequate
understanding.
Basic - Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, delivering
minimal information for a basic understanding.
Below Expectations - Briefly recognizes the issue to be
considered, but may not deliver additional information
necessary for a
basic understanding.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the instructions.
Distinguished - Uses appropriate, pertinent, and persuasive
content to discover and develop sophisticated ideas within the
context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.
Proficient - Uses appropriate and pertinent content to discover
ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a
whole.
Basic - Uses appropriate and pertinent content, but does not
apply it toward discovering or developing ideas. Overall,
content
assists in shaping the written work.
Below Expectations - Uses content, though it may be unrelated
or inappropriate to the topic. Content does not contribute
toward
13. the development of the written work, and may distract the
reader from its purpose.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the instructions.
Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and
organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and
grammar.
Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.
Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax
and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work
contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to
understand.
Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics,
such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few
errors, which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of
syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written
work
contains major errors, which distract the reader.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the instructions.
Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently
throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper.
However, layout contains a few minor errors.
14. Basic - Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout
the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA
formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout
difficult to
distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the instructions.
Distinguished - The paper meets the specific page requirement
stipulated in the assignment description.
Proficient - The paper closely meets the page requirement
stipulated in the assignment description.
Basic - The paper meets over half of the page requirement
stipulated in the assignment description.
Below Expectations - A fraction of the page requirement is
completed.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the instructions.
Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of
scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support
ideas. All
sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly
within the body of the assignment.
Proficient - Uses required number of scholarly sources to
support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and
15. cited
correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support
ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on
the reference page are used within the body of the assignment.
Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Written Communication: Content Development Total: 0.40
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 0.20
Written Communication: APA Formatting Total: 0.20
Written Communication: Page Requirement Total: 0.20
Written Communication: Resource Requirement Total: 0.20
2/21/2019
https://ashford.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/2915/preview
https://ashford.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/2915/preview
3/3
Below Expectations - Uses inadequate number of sources that
provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be
scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used
within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted
correctly.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the instructions.
16. Powered by
2/21/2019 Week 3 - Assignment
https://ashford.instructure.com/courses/39973/assignments/8031
51?module_item_id=2032262 1/2
Week 3 - Assignment
Emo�onal Effects of Performance Appraisals
Read the Mitchell article on the emotional responses to
performance appraisal feedback.
Assume you are a manager at your current place of employment
or at a former employer. In a one- to
two-page paper (not including title and reference pages),
describe the potential emotional outcomes of
your appraisal using Figure 1 on the fourth page (numbered
Page 85) of the article.
In addition, considering that each employee might respond
differently to your appraisal, explain how
you would address each emotion to benefit both the employee
and your organization.
You need to use at least one scholarly source in addition to the
textbook and your paper needs to be
formatted using APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing
Center. The conclusions found on pages
22 and 23 of the article (numbered Pages 103 and 104) provide
guidance on the effects each emotion
17. may have on the organization.
Carefully review the Grading Rubric
(http://ashford.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/2915/preview
) for the criteria that will be used to
evaluate your assignment.
Waypoint Assignment
Submission
The assignments in this course will be submitted to Waypoint.
Please refer to the instructions below
to submit your assignment.
1. Click on the Assignment Submission button below. The
Waypoint "Student Dashboard" will open
in a new browser window.
2. Browse for your assignment.
3. Click Upload.
4. Confirm that your assignment was successfully submitted by
viewing the appropriate week's
assignment tab in Waypoint.
For more detailed instructions, refer to the Waypoint Tutorial
(https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/dc358
708-3d2b-41a6-a000-
ff53b3cc3794/1/Waypoint%20Tutorial.pdf)
(https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/dc358
708-3d2b-41a6-a000-
ff53b3cc3794/1/Waypoint%20Tutorial.pdf) .
http://ashford.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/2915/preview
https://content.bridgepointeducation.com/curriculum/file/dc358