2.  The best method introduction of a modern
problem solving model in the Lee County
Sheriff’s Office in order to replace the current
ineffective incident-driven paradigm.

3.  Incident driven problem solving model is
currently used
 Outdated, ineffective, crime is undetected or
under-reported
 Does not address building relationships
 Does not address intelligence process
 Builds ill-will among public and organization

4.  State Police Investigative Structure and the
Adoption of Intelligence Led Policing
 The Effectiveness of Police Intelligence
Management: A New Zealand Case Study.
 Seeing Like a Citizen: Field Experiments in
"Community Intelligence-led Policing"

5.  Intelligence-Led Policing and the Problems of
Turning Rhetoric Into Practice.
 Changing Today's Law Enforcement Culture to
Face 21st-Century Threats
 Intelligence-Led Policing in a Fusion Center
 Intelligence Led Policing: The Integration of
Community Policing and Law Enforcement
Intelligence

6.  The scope of this project requires that I propose
four alternative possibilities to address the
problem statement.
 Based on my research, instruction through my
educational endeavors, and personal
experience I have proposed four potential
alternatives to address the problem statement.

7.  Alternative One: Adopt Intelligence-Led
Policing
 Alternative Two: Adopt Community Oriented
Policing
 Alternative Three: Adopt Problem Oriented
Policing
 Alternative Four: Embrace a status-quo
doctrine

8.  Quantitative and comparative analysis was
applied against the four alternatives in order to
determine the best possible solution to address
the problem statement.

9. A comparative analysis begins with a baseline. In this
case it was the current condition that was indicated
through the problem statement.
I have been provided factors that provide a numerical
weight as to each alternative’s legal, political,
organizational, and financial implications.
The research conducted in the production of this project
supports the individual weights that I have assigned to
each alternative based on the factors that have been
provided to me.

10.  The following slides represent the application
of the factors.

11. Legal Financial Organizational Political
1 An examination of the organization’s
Alternative One three-year goals, including the next year
implementation plan for these goals, in
relation to this selected possible
5 4 5 5
Intelligence Led 2
alternative.
An examination of any proposed public
policy changes to the organization and
Policing its relationship to this selected possible
alternative.
5 5 4 5
3 An examination of the organization’s
budget regarding its impact on this 5 4 4 5
selected possible alternative.
4 An examination of the organization’s
organizational chart and its rationale for
5 5 4 5
the organizational structure in relation
to this selected possible alternative.
5 An examination of the organization’s
employee performance evaluation
5 5 5 5
system in relation to this selected
possible alternative.
6 A review of the organization’s existing
policies and your problem statement in
5 0 5 5
relation to relevant state and federal
employment laws.
7 A review of the organization’s
collective bargaining agreement
5 5 5 0
regarding this selected possible
alternative.
8 A review of the organization’s
emergency and/or strategic plan(s)
addressing mitigation and response, 5 5 5 5
including threats, to this selected
possible alternative.
9 A review of the organization’s
emergency and/or strategic plan(s)
addressing mitigation and response to 5 5 5 5
natural disasters regarding this selected
possible alternative.
10 An examination of the organization’s
human resource policy regarding proper
staffing, to include the negative impact 5 4 5 5
of job-related stresses, regarding this
selected possible alternative.
11 An examination of the ethical issues
common to this organization in relation 5 5 5 4
to this selected possible alternative.
Category Points 55 47 52 49
Total Points 203

12. Legal Financial Organizational Political
1 An examination of the organization’s
Alternative Two three-year goals, including the next year
implementation plan for these goals, in
relation to this selected possible
5 5 4 4
Community Oriented 2
alternative.
An examination of any proposed public
policy changes to the organization and
Policing its relationship to this selected possible
alternative.
3 4 3 4
3 An examination of the organization’s
budget regarding its impact on this 5 3 4 5
selected possible alternative.
4 An examination of the organization’s
organizational chart and its rationale for 5
5 4 4
the organizational structure in relation
to this selected possible alternative.
5 An examination of the organization’s
employee performance evaluation
5 5 4 0
system in relation to this selected
possible alternative.
6 A review of the organization’s existing
policies and your problem statement in
5 0 5 0
relation to relevant state and federal
employment laws.
7 A review of the organization’s
collective bargaining agreement
0 4 3 3
regarding this selected possible
alternative.
8 A review of the organization’s
emergency and/or strategic plan(s)
addressing mitigation and response, 5 5 5 5
including threats, to this selected
possible alternative.
9 A review of the organization’s
emergency and/or strategic plan(s)
addressing mitigation and response to 0 0 0 0
natural disasters regarding this selected
possible alternative.
10 An examination of the organization’s
human resource policy regarding proper
staffing, to include the negative impact 5 0 4 1
of job-related stresses, regarding this
selected possible alternative.
11 An examination of the ethical issues
common to this organization in relation 5 5 5 5
to this selected possible alternative.
Category Points 43 36 41 31
Total Points 151

13. Legal Financial Organizational Political
1 An examination of the organization’s
Alternative Three three-year goals, including the next year
implementation plan for these goals, in
relation to this selected possible
4 3 4 4
Problem Oriented 2
alternative.
An examination of any proposed public
policy changes to the organization and
Policing its relationship to this selected possible
alternative.
4 5 5 4
3 An examination of the organization’s
budget regarding its impact on this 5 3 0 3
selected possible alternative.
4 An examination of the organization’s
organizational chart and its rationale for
0 5 0 4
the organizational structure in relation
to this selected possible alternative.
5 An examination of the organization’s
employee performance evaluation
5 5 5 1
system in relation to this selected
possible alternative.
6 A review of the organization’s existing
policies and your problem statement in
1 5 4 0
relation to relevant state and federal
employment laws.
7 A review of the organization’s
collective bargaining agreement
3 4 0 3
regarding this selected possible
alternative.
8 A review of the organization’s
emergency and/or strategic plan(s)
addressing mitigation and response, 5 0 5 0
including threats, to this selected
possible alternative.
9 A review of the organization’s
emergency and/or strategic plan(s)
addressing mitigation and response to 5 5 0 0
natural disasters regarding this selected
possible alternative.
10 An examination of the organization’s
human resource policy regarding proper
staffing, to include the negative impact 4 5 4 4
of job-related stresses, regarding this
selected possible alternative.
11 An examination of the ethical issues
common to this organization in relation 5 5 4 4
to this selected possible alternative.
Category Points 41 45 31 27
Total Points 144

14. Legal Financial Organizational Political
1 An examination of the organization’s
Alternative Four three-year goals, including the next year
implementation plan for these goals, in
relation to this selected possible
4 5 4 1
Enforce a Status-quo 2
alternative.
An examination of any proposed public
policy changes to the organization and
Doctrine its relationship to this selected possible
alternative.
5 5 5 0
3 An examination of the organization’s
budget regarding its impact on this 5 4 3 3
selected possible alternative.
4 An examination of the organization’s
organizational chart and its rationale for
0 0 1 0
the organizational structure in relation
to this selected possible alternative.
5 An examination of the organization’s
employee performance evaluation
5 5 1 1
system in relation to this selected
possible alternative.
6 A review of the organization’s existing
policies and your problem statement in
4 5 1 1
relation to relevant state and federal
employment laws.
7 A review of the organization’s
collective bargaining agreement
5 0 1 0
regarding this selected possible
alternative.
8 A review of the organization’s
emergency and/or strategic plan(s)
addressing mitigation and response, 5 0 0 1
including threats, to this selected
possible alternative.
9 A review of the organization’s
emergency and/or strategic plan(s)
addressing mitigation and response to 5 0 1 0
natural disasters regarding this selected
possible alternative.
10 An examination of the organization’s
human resource policy regarding proper
staffing, to include the negative impact 4 4 1 1
of job-related stresses, regarding this
selected possible alternative.
11 An examination of the ethical issues
common to this organization in relation 5 5 0 1
to this selected possible alternative.
Category Points 47 33 18 9
Total Points 107

15.  In considering all of the factors that have been
applied to each alternative it has been
concluded that the implementation of
Intelligence-led policing is the best solution to
address the problem statement.

16.  Intelligence Led Policing is funded through
USDOJ
 Addresses all hazards
 Includes agency, public, private participation
 Scalable to any agency
 Federal assistance for navigating transition
 Increases effectiveness nearly immediately

17.  The choice to adopt a new problem solving
model must be evaluated
 Evaluation must begin within the first three
months
 Evaluation must continue for at least two years
 Quarterly evaluations
 Annual evaluations
 Bi-annual evaluations

18.  Is crime reduced?
 Are problems easier to manage?
 Have new crimes been discovered?
 Is the problem fiscally viable to continue?
 Has the public received the changes well?
 Is it sustainable from an organizational
perspective?
 Has there been any substantial legal challenges
(civil rights, etc.)?

19.  Annual public reports on progress
 Continual public engagement during the
implementation
 Success hinges on a cultural and philosophical
shift within the agency

20.  Thank you for the opportunity to present my
findings to you. Should you have any
questions or comments feel free to contact me
at mzaleski@edison.edu.