2. Aim
• Not: the way to make LOD datasets findable
• But (inspirational):
• showcase how to make old fashioned (XML)
metadata queriable in LOD
• How one could integrate some well established
(repository) tech in a LOD context
• However:
• CMDI could have (a) profile(s) specially for LOD
datasets, which would make them findable in
CLARIN’s VLO
6. 2RDF
• CMD is classicW3C schema constrained XML
• To map a CMD record to RDF we need
• A mapping for the basic component model to RDFS
• Basic classes and properties to represent profiles, components,
elements, attributes and their relationships and values
• A mapping for a specific profile or component to RDFS
• A specific subclass or subproperty of the basic component model
• A mapping for specific metadata records to RDF instances of RDFS
• Instances of profile or component
• Additionaly there is a generic CMD envelop that is mapped using
common LOD vocabularies
8. Holy grail
• Data: interesting typological feature
• Metadata: find lexica for the languages
• Data: find a word wich exposes the feature, find
its phonetic transciption
• Metadata: find multimodal annoations for the
language
• Data: match the word in the phonetic tier
• Metadata: find annotated media resource
• Data: show the mediafragment containing the
utterance