4. THIS FRAMEWORK BOOSTS SHARING, NOT JUST POPULARITY
Even an Average Joe can spread a shareable message
Influencer
Large followings don’t always
distribute a message effectively
(Popular)
Average Person
The right message will be
passed from person to person
(Viral)
@MrobertsOnline
5. WE CAN OPTIMIZE THE
MESSAGE TO MAKE AVERAGE
PEOPLE THE INFLUENCERS.
14. THE INTERNET IS THE 2ND LARGEST
DRIVER OF WORD OF MOUTH.
Online content is one of the most cost-effective ways to infiltrate a message
into every day consumer conversations.
15. THE RIGHT MESSAGE WILL
IMPACT THAT 93%.
We use several frameworks to optimize content for word of
mouth; highlighted in the appendix.
22. ADS VERSUS CONTENT
Although similar, there are significant differences.
Advertisements
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Directly tries to sell something
Pay to produce and to distribute
the ad
Only helps understand product
features / benefits
Interrupts people
Run in campaigns with ending
dates
@MrobertsOnline
Content Marketing
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Doesn’t try to sell anything
directly
Pay to produce, but gets
distributed by average people
Provides real value without a
catch
People seek this out
Ongoing with no ending
This is an influencer. When they share something it can become popular. In other words, many people will be exposed to the message This is different than something going viral, or being passed from one person to another. Research shows that messages optimized for social sharing reach much farther when spread by the average joes and janes than by the influencers.
Trust is a huge reason why WOM is so huge.
[QUESTION]If you look at the trend: we don’t see any acceleration over the last several years of online WOM growing. You have to expand to a 10 year window to see that. The industry is optimizing for this 7% right now. Implications:Offline conversations seem to be much more impactful and deeper interactions than online. Only 10% of people respond to a friend’s comment on their own post. This is very shallow; imagine doing this in real life. Google Study: Google is the #1 place people turn to after WOM conversations for more information.
We over value what we can measure and undervalue what we can’t measure. How do you measure a cell phone recommendation over dinner? This is part of the deficiency of social signals. We don’t have share and like counts for offline conversations. WOM is only effective if people actually talk. Just posting on social channels doesn’t mean people will actually see it or spread it.
The internet is the second largest driver of this offline WOM, only just behind TV where spend is much larger. The brand website is the most frequent internet content source for WOM, followed by internet advertising and third-party websites.More than 40% of what people talk about is their personal experiences or personal relationships. Similarly, around half of tweets are “me” focused, covering what people are doing now or something that has happened to them. (p. 33) People were willing to forgo money to share their opinions. Overall, they were willing to take a 25% pay cut to share their thoughts.
We can deliver impact that we can’t measure. We should deliver it anyway.We should deliver content that influences that 93% of offline word of mouth.The industry is currently optimizing to impact the 7% of online sharing. - The physical, in person hangout where people gather around and watch YouTube videos.- We need to create awesome, remarkable content.This affects what people search for.
Not only is InkyBee being referenced AND linked to in a prominent place on their home page…PR Couture will also be much more likely to engage with and share InkyBee’s content as a Thank You.
Not only is InkyBee being referenced AND linked to in a prominent place on their home page…PR Couture will also be much more likely to engage with and share InkyBee’s content as a Thank You.
If you have subscribers, members, frequent customers, etc. this concept applies even though these examples aren’t directly content related.
Here Kevin Rose is interviewing Chad Hurley, the cofounder of YouTube.