1. Industrial
Strength
QM/MM:
Computa8onal
high
throughput
screening
of
enzyme
ac8vity
in
enzyme
mutants
Jan
H.
Jensen,
Mar$n
Hediger,
Luca
De
Vico,
Kasper
Primdal,
Allan
Svendsen,
Werner
Besenma=er
Department
of
Chemistry
University
of
Copenhagen
Slides
at:
h=p://Fnyurl.com/bsqbojf
MarFn
R.
Hediger,
Luca
De
Vico,
Allan
Svendsen,
Werner
Besenma=er,
Jan
H.
Jensen
“A
ComputaFonal
Methodology
to
Screen
AcFviFes
of
Enzyme
Variants”
PLoS
ONE,
submi=ed.
h=p://arxiv.org/abs/1203.2950
2. Slides
at:
h=p://Fnyurl.com/bsqbojf
Industrial
enzyme
design
High-‐through
put
screening
of
100s
of
mutants
IdenFfies
promising
candidates
for
further
study
ComputaFonal
predicFon:
Homology
modeling
QSAR
(QM
or
QM/MM
too
slow
and
lacks
automaFon)
IdenFfies
promising
candidates
for
further
study
Further
study:
20-‐50
mutants
Goal
Automated
predicFon
of
barrier
height
for
enzymaFc
reacFon
within
24
hr
using
<
10
cores
IdenFfies
promising
candidates
for
further
study
3. Methods
PM6
implemented
in
Mopac2009
(MOZYME)
Automated
mutant
builder
(PYMOL)
Barrier
from
adiabaFc
mapping
Applica$on
Increase
amidase
acFvity
in
an
estarase
(CalB)
MarFn
R.
Hediger,
Luca
De
Vico,
Allan
Svendsen,
Werner
Besenma=er,
Jan
H.
Jensen
“A
ComputaFonal
Methodology
to
Screen
AcFviFes
of
Enzyme
Variants”
PLoS
ONE,
submi=ed.
10. Future
Direc$ons
Whole
protein
COSMO
solvaFon
More
automaFzaFon
Be=er
sampling
Complete
scan
of
single
mutants
Single
-‐>
double
-‐>
triple
mutants
PM6
in
GAMESS
Linear
scaling
PM6
PM6/PCM
interface
AlternaFves
to
adiabaFc
mapping
Beyond
PM6:
EFMO
11. Blurring
the
boundary
between
linear
scaling
QM,
QM/MM
and
polarizable
force
fields
The
Effec@ve
Fragment
Molecular
Orbital
Method
Jan
H.
Jensen,
Casper
Steinmann,
Mikael
Wistoi
Ibsen,
Kasper
Thoie
University
of
Copenhagen
Dmitri
Fedorov
AIST,
Japan
Casper
Steinmann,
Dmitri
G.
Fedorov,
and
Jan
H.
Jensen
“ The
EffecFve
Fragment
Molecular
Orbital
Method:
A
Merger
of
the
Fragment
Molecular
Orbital
and
EffecFve
Fragment
PotenFal
Methods”
Journal
of
Physical
Chemistry
A
2010,
114,
8705-‐8712
Casper
Steinmann,
Dmitri
G.
Fedorov,
and
Jan
H.
Jensen
“ The
EffecFve
Fragment
Molecular
Orbital
Method
for
Fragments
Connected
by
Covalent
Bonds”
PLoS
ONE,
submi=ed.
h=p://arxiv.org/abs/1202.4935
11
12. The
Effec$ve
Fragment
Molecular
Orbital
(EFMO)
method
Using
ideas
from
the
EffecFve
Fragment
PotenFal
(EFP)
and
the
Fragment
Molecular
Orbital
(FMO)
method
12
13. The
Effec$ve
Fragment
Molecular
Orbital
(EFMO)
method
(Using
ideas
from
the
EffecFve
Fragment
PotenFal
(EFP)
method)
Monomer
SCF
in
the
gas
phase
Extract
mulFpoles
and
dipole
polarizability
13
14. The
Effec$ve
Fragment
Molecular
Orbital
(EFMO)
method
(Using
ideas
from
the
EffecFve
Fragment
PotenFal
(EFP)
method)
Many-‐body
polariza$on
Computed
classically
using
induced
dipoles
for
enFre
system
14
15. The
Effec$ve
Fragment
Molecular
Orbital
(EFMO)
method
(Using
ideas
from
the
EffecFve
Fragment
PotenFal
(EFP)
method)
Coulomb
and
Non-‐Coulomb
effects
dimer
SCF
in
the
gas
phase
15
16. The
Effec$ve
Fragment
Molecular
Orbital
(EFMO)
method
(Using
ideas
from
the
EffecFve
Fragment
PotenFal
(EFP)
method)
Coulomb
effects
Computed
using
staFc
mulFpoles
16
19. Implemented
in
GAMESS
With
gradients
Trp
cage
(20
residues)
2
residues/fragment
EFMO
FMO2
Error
in
energy
-‐4.3
6.4
kcal/mol
MP2/6-‐31G(d)
gradient
314
409
minutes
20
cores
(most
Fme
spent
in
MP2
dimers)
19
20. QM/”MM”
PCM
Large
parts
of
MM
region
oien
frozen
=
Requires
only
monomer
gas
phase
calculaFons
for
that
region
=
Very
fast
20
21. To
Do
Flexible
EFP/Polarizable
“Force
Field”
covalent
dimers
∑ (E )
N
E EFMO = ∑ EI0 + 0
IJ − EI0 − EJ − EIJ
0 POL
I IJ
( )
N
+ ∑ EIJ + EIJ /CT + EIJ + Etot
ES XR Disp POL
IJ
Important
miscellanea
EFMO
GUI:
FRAGIT
(Mikael
Ibsen)
TS
search
algorithms
(Kasper
Thoie)
21