SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 77
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
One Profession, May 17, 2019:
The ethics of getting paid: fee
agreements and trust accounts
Todd C. Scott
VP Risk Management
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Ins Co
Michael Trittipo
Attorney Editor
Minnesota State Bar Association
1. Have a fee agreement
◦ A. Know your choices.
◦ B. Put it in writing
◦ C. Do it right (dotting “i”s & crossing “t”s)
2. Have a trust account
◦ A. Use it
◦ B. Use it right (where, when, how, why for what, whose money)
◦ C. Put it in writing (at least monthly)
3. Avoid scams (from far or near)
◦ A. Know a little UCC
◦ B. Do some digging (a/k/a due diligence)
◦ C. Trust – but verify; don’t create temptations
Focus today:
First two subject to rules:
1. Have a fee agreement – RPR 1.5(b)
2. Have a trust account – RPR 1.15 & Appendix 1
Third from statute and best practices:
1. Have a fee agreement – RPR 1.5(b)
2. Have a trust account – RPR 1.15 & Appendix 1
3. Scams?
◦ From outside – UCC, Minn. Stat. ch. 336, art. 3
(negotiable instruments)
◦ From inside – best practices on separation of powers, esp. as to
money, but see also RPR 5.3 (delegate – but supervise well)
Why focus on fee agreements?
• Most common source of admonitions (per OLPR 4/2018)
• Within your control
• To your benefit that client “get it” clearly
• Can help you avoid many potential problems
What can a lawyer charge?
What can a lawyer charge?
… [(b) & (c) address communicating the fee basis, the not-yet-earned presumption, and contingencies]
What can a lawyer charge?
 A division of fee between lawyers who are not
in the same firm may be made only if:
 (1) in proportion to the services performed by each
lawyer or, by written agreement with the client,
each lawyer assumes joint responsibility for the
representation;
 (2) the client is advised of the share that each
lawyer is to receive and does not object to the
participation of all the lawyers involved; and
 (3) the total fee is reasonable.
Billing arrangements
Did you know?
It is not required to
have a written
contract for
hourly fee legal
services…
But it is a really,
really, really, really
good idea…
Billing arrangements
Why?
It is still considered
good public policy
to allow lawyers and
clients to have an
oral agreement to
perform legal
services, especially
when things should
happen quickly.
Billing arrangements
When is a
written contract
required?
Retainer agreements
Flat fee agreements
Contingency fee
agreements
Billing arrangements
Memorializing the
entire legal services
arrangement:
First: Engagement
agreement and letter; OR
First: Non-engagement
agreement
Last: Closing letter
Billing arrangements
The engagement agreement
must have:
Date of start of legal services
Names of person(s) contracting for
services
Scope of legal services
Fees (if any) being charged: basis or rate
Any other requirements necessary to
proceed
Billing arrangements
The non-engagement
agreement should have:
Affirmative statement you are not
representing the client in their legal
matter.
General warning that time limits may
be tolling on their matter and they
should consult with other attorneys
immediately.
Billing arrangements
Q. Why are
non-engagement
letters so
important?
A. You want to be able to
prove that an attorney-
client relationship never
was formed, therefore
you had no fiduciary duty
to the person.
Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe, 291 N.W. 2d 686 (1980)
Billing arrangements
More information
(including template)
available at:
https://www.mlmins.com/Library
/Non-Engagement%20Guide.pdf
Billing arrangements
The closing letter should
have:
Date of the letter.
Affirmative statement that the matter
has concluded and you are no longer
representing the client.
Q. Why is this so important?
A. You want to clearly identify the last day
of the legal representation
1. Hourly fee:
An agreed upon rate of payment
owed by the client that is
calculated by the number of
hours the attorney works on the
client’s matter.
Tracking billable time:
The hourly fee is usually
calculated in tenths of an hour
and the lawyer is permitted to
have minimum hourly fees if it is
included ion the writing.
1. Hourly fee:
An agreed upon rate of
payment owed by the client
that is calculated by the
number of hours the attorney
works on the client’s matter.
How rates are
determined:
The lawyer and client can agree
to any hourly rate, and it is not
required that an agreement be
in writing. However, it is a
good idea to have the fee
agreement in writing in case
there is a misunderstanding
about the fee between the
lawyer and client.
Hourly fee invoicing:
The invoice needs to be in writing but invoice by
email other electronic means is permitted.
2. Hourly fee with
retainer payment:
An agreed upon rate of payment
owed by the client that is
calculated by the number of
hours the attorney works on the
client’s matter. The client also
agrees to pay the lawyer in
advance a sum of money that will
be held in trust, but which the
lawyer may earn.
How the fee is earned:
For the lawyer to earn the
retainer money, the work must be
completed and the client must be
notified in writing.
How the fee is billed:
Once properly earned, the lawyer can
transfer money from the retainer out of
trust and into the firm’s general account.
3. Flat fee:
The final fee owed to the lawyer
is a certain set amount that the
client will pay at the start of the
matter. Flat fees are more
frequently used in domestic case,
criminal, and immigration legal
matters.
Flat fee agreement:
Lawyers charging flat fees will
carefully identify, in writing for
the client, what services the
client will receive in exchange for
the flat fee amount.
3. Flat fee:
The final fee owed to the lawyer
is a certain set amount that the
client will pay at the start of the
matter. Flat fees are more
frequently used in domestic case,
criminal, and immigration legal
matters.
Non-refundable fees:
Not permitted under Minnesota
rules. Sometimes allowed in
other jurisdictions. (More
detail & tips on this point
to follow)
3. Flat fee:
The final fee owed to the lawyer
is a certain set amount that the
client will pay at the start of the
matter. Flat fees are more
frequently used in domestic case,
criminal, and immigration legal
matters.
Legal flat fee menu:
A list of flat fees for basic legal
services.
4. Contingency Fee:
The final fee owed to the lawyer
is contingent upon the outcome
of the case. Often the fee is a
percentage (25%, 33%, 40%) of
the whatever the client collects as
a part of the case.
How expenses are
handled:
Case costs or expenses are often
added to the fee. Case costs are
out-of-pocket expenses the
lawyer may have incurred from
3rd parties while working on
behalf of the client.
Hourly Fee Hourly with
Retainer
Flat fee Contingency Fee
No written
agreement
required.
Agreement
must be in
writing.
Agreement must
be in writing.
Agreement must
be in writing.
Billed monthly. Billed monthly. May be billed
once.
May be billed
once.
Expenses added
to legal fee.
Expenses added
to legal fee.
Expenses added
to legal fee.
Expenses added
to legal fee.
4 types of fee structures
Basic hourly legal bill
There is no requirement for how
the bill should look. This bill is
written on firm letterhead.
The goal is to make the bill
understandable. The fewer
questions the client has, the more
likely they are to pay the bill in a
timely way.
Extended, specific descriptions
may be more convincing than
cryptic, generic ones. (To judges,
too, in fee-award cases.)
Basic hourly legal bill
with retainer balance
The invoice will usually have all of
the attributes of an ordinary
hourly bill, but also:
 Trust account section showing
prior balance (before invoice)
and current balance (after
invoicing.)
Basic flat fee bill
The invoice will usually have:
 Firm name at top
 Recipient’s name
 Date of invoice
 Invoice number
 Date of legal services
 Description of legal services
 Total amount due
Basic contingency
settlement statement
The statement will usually have:
 Firm name at top
 Recipient’s name of name
of case
 Settlement amount
 Attorneys fee with
percentage agreement
 Payments to others
 Expenses owed by client
 Net to client
Advance planning for “advance” fees
Rule 1.15(b): … Except as provided below, fee payments received by a lawyer before legal
services have been rendered are presumed to be unearned and shall be held in a trust
account pursuant to Rule 1.15.
(1) A lawyer may charge a flat fee for specified legal services, which constitutes complete
payment for those services and may be paid in whole or in part in advance of the lawyer
providing the services. If agreed to in advance in a written fee agreement signed by the
client, a flat fee shall be considered to be the lawyer’s property upon payment of the fee,
subject to refund as described in Rule 1.5(b)(3). Such a written fee agreement shall notify
the client:
(i) of the nature and scope of the services to be provided;
(ii) of the total amount of the fee and the terms of payment;
(iii) that the fee will not be held in a trust account until earned;
(iv) that the client has the right to terminate the client-lawyer relationship; and
(v) that the client will be entitled to a refund of all or a portion of the fee if the agreed-
upon legal services are not provided.
(2) [“Availability” fees]
(3) Fee agreements may not describe any fee as nonrefundable or earned upon receipt but
may describe the advance fee payment as the lawyer’s property subject to refund. …
Advance planning for “advance” fees
1) Only as complete payment for specified services
(Flat-fee or defined-scope, not open-ended hourly.)
2) Can’t say “non-refundable” or “earned upon receipt”
(or “24 hours later,” etc.)
3) May say “the lawyer’s property, subject to refund”
(but “my property” ≠ “earned.”)
4) Must give five (5) specific notices
5) Only fees for service, NOT client money advanced for costs
(e.g., filing or recording fees. Those must still go into a trust account.)
Rule 1.15(b)(3): Fee agreements may not describe any fee as nonrefundable or earned upon receipt but
may describe the advance fee payment as the lawyer’s property subject to refund. … In re Petition for
Disciplinary Action Against Torgerson, 870 N.W.2d 602 (Minn., 2015) The fees aren’t earned until the
specified services are actually completed.
What’s the motivation?
1) To avoid having a trust account just
because you think it’s hard to do it
right? Reconsider! Having and
using a trust account and doing the
record-keeping is not that hard.
2) Being sure one’s dotted all the “i”s
and crossed all the “t”s for advance
fees is actually more onerous – and
failure on any Rule 1.5(b) element
can be disastrous.
What’s the motivation?
Accidental occasional slip-ups in record-keeping for trust accounts are
often handled with only private admonitions. The most severe
treatment in any Minnesota Supreme Court decision of the past two
years for merely inadvertent “misappropriation” alone has been a public
reprimand and two years probation.
In contrast, messing up even a single element required for taking money
in advance without using a trust account typically creates an intentional,
not just negligent, violation. The intentional act is choosing to put the
money into the business account instead of into a trust account. And
intentional misappropriation, even of only a couple hundred dollars, can
be sufficient basis on its own for disbarment.
Summary on fee agreements
 Have written fee agreements to avoid
misunderstandings about bills.
 Ensure your fees are reasonable: review the
criteria in Rule 1.5
 Get sufficient retainers, but use a trust account;
they’re not scary or hard, & they can shield you
 Think twice before suing a client for fees: it
often results in a counter-claim
 Arbitrate fee disputes to avoid client lawsuits
Trust accounts
 Why you need one
 What you need to do
 Where to open an account
 What kind of account(s) to open
 What books & records are needed
 How you create and keep those in order
 Where to find how-to’s & help
Why? Not just a modern nanny
“bureaucratic” requirement
Historical and international comparisons
◦ Beginning ca. 13th century in Europe
◦ European requirements now: like U.S. or more stringent
Compare:
◦ Wisconsin 2016 amendments
◦ Minnesota pre-1975
◦ Minnesota now
Structural issue: money an inherent conflict; plus a
power/information imbalance (who has access to do
what) – so fiduciary duties
Why? Reasons go back
centuries (even millennia)
Roman and Greek antipathy to lawyers– especially to
lawyers asking for or receiving compensation at all
Early European antipathy over compensation
◦ Icelandic sagas (ca. 13th cent.) “After accepting a[n expensive]
ring at the initial consultation, Eyjolf [the lawyer, told his
client] ‘Be most careful not to say that ye have given goods for
my help.’” The Story of Burnt Njal (Sir George Webbe Dusent
trans., 1971), n.137.
Not just money (ambidexterity) – but it played a role
Why? In N.A., too, tension
over lawyers being paid
◦ Issues not unique to Old World or medieval times
◦ Roughly 1650-1720, American colonies like Virginia and
Carolina (most) often made “mercenary” lawyers illegal
“[It is] a base and vile thing to plead for money or reward; nor
shall anyone (except he be a near kinsman…) be permitted to
plead another man's cause, till … he hath taken an oath, that
he doth not plead for money or reward ….” The Fundamental
Constitutions of Carolina (1669), § 70. 2 Poore, note 48, at 1404
◦ Maybe a feature of Utopias generally (incl. Sir Thomas
More’s, but also aspiring ones)
Why? Resolution: trust, but
verify (require accounting)
Court’s recognized lawyers had a duty toaccount to
clients (and to disciplinary authorities)
“Account” was non-technical: simply to tell what
happened to the money, what was done
But since it is money, counting’s involved, too.
(Shakespeare mentions “counters” twice.)
Lawyers remain unpopular (Henry VI), but clients can
demand an accounting – so lawyers must be prepared
to give an account (to tell what happened, to the penny).
Two duties:
◦ actually safekeeping the property
(avoiding commingling, using
separate accounts to protect from
own creditors, etc.), and
◦ keeping the right records to show it,
i.e., to be able to give an account
(no “no harm, no foul” rule)
(essentially the duty of loyalty or honesty for the first, and the duties
of diligence and competence for the second)
Short answer:
Rule 1.15 says so
◦ (a) ”All funds of clients or third persons held by a lawyer
or law firm in connection with a representation shall be
deposited in one or more identifiable trust accounts ….”
◦ (c)(3) “A lawyer shall: … maintain complete records of all
funds … of a client or third person coming into the
possession of the lawyer and render appropriate accounts
to the client or third person regarding them ….”
◦ (h) “Every lawyer engaged in private practice of law shall
maintain or cause to be maintained on a current basis,
books and records sufficient to … establish compliance
with paragraphs (a) through (f).
What’s “complete” or “sufficient”?
◦(c)(3) “A lawyer shall: … maintain
complete records
◦ (h) “… [and] on a current basis … books and
records sufficient to … establish compliance
with paragraphs (a) through (f).”
… ?
What’s “complete” or “sufficient”?
◦ Q: 1.15(c)(3) “A lawyer shall: … maintain complete records
(h) “… [and] books and records sufficient to … establish compliance
with paragraphs (a) through (f).” … Tell me more?
◦ A: 1.15(i) … “The Lawyers Professional
Responsibility Board shall publish annually
the books and records required [by (h)].”
◦ It does so by “Appendix 1.” Re-read each year.
Rule 1.15: “Amended Dec. 27, 1989 …, July 28, 1999 …, June 17,
2005 …, Dec. 21, 2006 …, effective July 1, 2010; effective July 1,
2011 …
Appendix 1 may change each year even if Rule 1.15 doesn’t
◦ 2015 amendments re reconciliation date, method of handling
negative balances, “separately maintained,” etc.
Every year, you certify that you’re in compliance. That’s a sworn
statement, and disciplinable on its own if not true.
Re-read regularly for changes
—both Rule 1.15 & Appendix 1
App. 1, 2015 amendments
App. 1, 2015 amendments
2015 amendments, highlights
Trial balance used to be required as of “the end of each month,” but 2015 changed
that to “as of the date of the monthly bank statement.”
Allowed PDFs as “print-outs,” needn’t be on paper with ink
Books and records must be maintained “ separately … for each individual trust
account.” (“May factor into … whether to open a separate interest-bearing
account ….”) (Read “individual” as “distinct,” not as “non-pooled.”)
Set ceiling on “nominal” funds of lawyer in trust account at$200.00 specifically.
Added specific detail on how, during reconciliation, to treat any negative balance
found in a client ledger.
Added credit cards provisions; required a check number in register
“Director does not consider overdrafts caused by a lawyer issuing funds from a
trust account prior to the deposit instrument clearing to be bank error.”
That looks hard. I’ll risk 1.15(b)’s pitfalls!
Balderdash.
Can be done with a check
register & paper ledgers,
or simple spreadsheets
Many software choices to
make it even easier
Don’t treat “hard” as an
excuse to delegate* it until
you’ve done it yourself
* And never confuse “delegate” with “abdicate”
How to do it: six easy steps
◦ Go to an OLPR-approved bank
(“financial institution”). (1.15(d,j))
◦ Open an IOLTA account.*
◦ Name it, including “trust account”
(explicitly, with those words)
◦ Puts world (creditors) on notice:
not your firm’s money
◦ Make its checks a :
not required but a good idea
◦ Deposit most money your get from
or for clients into it.
◦ Pay most matters’ expenses & your
fees out of it.
◦ Keep complete records** on what
goes in & out.
* If you need a different type, you’ll know
Spoiler alert: Two (2) main things lawyers
don’t do that get them into trouble. Two.
1) Not keeping “client
matter subsidiary ledgers.”
2) Not doing a three-way
(3-way) reconciliation each
month.
How-to: paper and Ink
• Recommended by Jay Foonberg in ABA guide, as a foundation or
background before computerizing. (So you know what records
should look like. “It’s the software’s|accountant’s fault!” No.)
• Described in an Ill. Att’y Registr’n & Disciplinary Commiss’n guide:
– http://www.iardc.org/clienttrusthandbook_toc.html
• And in California:
– http://www.calbar.ca.gov/calbar/pdfs/ethics/2003_CTA_Handbook.pdf
How to: paper and ink: LPRB guide “Other People’s
Money: Operating Lawyer Trust Accounts”
How-to: paper and ink: LPRB guide “Other People’s
Money: Operating Lawyer Trust Accounts”
Simple; easy to
understand
Main downsides to
manual entry on paper:
1) need to enter every
amount twice (two
places: “double entry”)
2) manual/mental/calc
addition & subtraction
(just 3rd grade math)
How-to, using software
Software saves the double-entry: enter any amount just ONCE,
and say just ONCE which client matter it involves.
Some software requires you to set up a “chart of accounts”;
other software does an equivalent for you behind the scenes,
based on you telling it (1) the clients & matters you’re holding
money for, and (2) what bank account the money is in. Easy.
The MSBA has guides for specific programs of both types.
How-to: MSBA guides
QuickBooks Desktop & Online; Cosmolex; TrustBooks; Tabs3; Xero; GnuCash; …
How-to basics, easy overview
(same whether paper or software)
A. Every day you need these two books*:
◦ 1) check register – with a running balance
◦ 2) “matter subsidiary ledgers” – with running balances
B. Once a month you receive a bank statement.
C. When you do,
◦ 1) reconcile your check register with the bank statement
◦ 2) add up the “matter subsidiary ledgers” balances
◦ 3) verify that (a) the total sum from step 2 matches (b) your
check register’s and (c) the “adjusted” bank statement
balance’s (three amounts must all match)
◦ “Print” your work to prove you did it. Print: (1) the check
register, (2) the “trial balance,” and (3) the three-way (not just
two-way) reconciliation. Keep the monthly “print-outs.”
D. If all three (3) balances don’t match, fix it.
* “Books” are what you do; “records” are what the bank gives you. Close enough.
How-to main details, paper or software
◦ 1) for each entry in the check register show:
◦ the date
◦ the amount
◦ who to, & number, if it’s a check*
◦ the client & matter it’s for
◦ the purpose (briefly)
◦ and the running balance (software will do for
you)
◦ 2) each entry in each client matter
subsidiary ledger must show the same (but
the client & matter is already obvious)
◦ 3) you will also need two more “subsidiary
ledgers”: one for interest (IF it’s not always
zero), and one for a “nominal” amount of
your fees: under $200
* Even for deposits, it’s good to show the source, even if not required.
This is how software
saves you work.
How-to on 3-way reconciliation – Part 1
◦ First reconcile two
amounts:
(1) the “adjusted“
bank statement
balance, with
(2) your check
register balance
-- easy, familiar
◦ Should be no (zero)
difference,. If not
zero, find and fix.
How-to on 3-way reconciliation – Part 2
◦ Then make sure the
same amount (as
shown {1} in the
bank statement and
{2} your check
register) equals
{3} the sum of all
current balances
shown in the client
subsidiary ledgers.
How-to on 3-way reconciliation – ex. 1
How-to on 3-way reconciliation – ex. 2
Check Register
Reminder: Two (2) main things lawyers
don’t do that get them into trouble. Two.
1) Not keeping “client matter subsidiary
ledgers” (or not keeping them current)
2) Not doing a three-way (3-way) reconciliation
each month.
Do those monthly, and you’re pretty much good.
Using legal-specific software like Cosmolex or
Tabs3 makes it easier & gives you guard-rails
(won’t let you write a check that might make any
client subsidiary ledger have a negative balance,
nor make a check or a deposit without assigning
it to a specific client matter, etc.)
How-to extra tip: never bypass your
business account for earned fees
• In re Miley, 486 N.W.2d 759 (Minn. 1992) (lawyer disciplined for
personal use of a trust account)
• First put earned fees into your operating account, then you can make
checks to whomever out from it
• But also: never leave earned fees in a trust account. No “cushions,”
no commingling.
How-to extra tip: credit cards
• Credit cards can be a problem.
• Taking credit cards may help some clients pay.
• But typical issuer agreement gives issuer rights to unilaterally reverse
transactions, debit accounts to which deposits were made, etc. – violating
1.15(j)
• Solution 1: put into operating (business) account, with immediate
transfer of unearned parts to trust account. Reversal then can only
affect your operating account, not the trust account.
• Solution 2: choose a service (e.g., Lawpay) that will guarantee not to
ever withdraw from the trust account, only your business account
How-to, final tips:
• Always use separate books for business and trust accounts
– KISS: Separate, separate, separate
– Avoids opportunities for confusion or mistake: avoids seeing
assets in operating accounts, & protects against overlooking
trust account shortfalls; also prevents tax confusion
• Always cash basis, never accrual (don’t get fancy; KISS)
– What’s there, not what will be
– Actual payments, not bills or anticipated bills
• Mirror reality without mental or software gymnastics (KISS)
– Use asset/liability whenever can, not income/expense
– Be consistent; make it simple and routine
How-to: Advisory opinions
LPRB will answer questions about actions you are considering
Must be asked in advance: prospective only
Need to be sufficiently concrete and complete as to the facts
http://lprb.mncourts.gov/LawyerResources/Pages/AdvisoryOpinions.aspxf
(651) 296-3952
Trust account scams
Trust account scams
How does the scam work?
 Attorney hired to collect debt:
 Real estate transaction
 Tort claim
 Divorce
 Equipment leases
 Fake check arrives at firm
 Fake check is deposited in client trust
 Attorney wires money from trust to
foreign bank account
Trust account scams
Why does the scam work?
 Attorney thinks check has “cleared”
 Efforts to verify check fail
 Scammer pressures the attorney to
disburse funds.
 Know the difference between “Check
cleared” and “Available funds”
Trust account scams
• “Where the lawyer has reason to be concerned about whether a check being
deposited will clear, the lawyer should not issue trust account checks against
that deposit until he or she has confirmed with the issuing bank that the
deposited check has cleared.” (emphasis added)
– http://www.mncourts.gov/lprb/trustfaq.html
• The FAQ’s phrasing is oddly soft. Really a “must not,” not just a “should not.”
See App. 1:
◦ “Except in the context of real estate sales transactions, an attorney shall not
disburse funds from a trust account unless the bank in which the attorney
maintains the trust account has made the funds available for disbursement and
the instrument that is the source of the deposit has cleared the bank account on
which it was issued. (emphasis added)
Theft of
client
funds
Theft of client funds
KPMG Research:
 Most theft conducted by fraudulent checks
 Deposits made to employee’s own account
 Deposits made to vendor accomplice
 Access to: credit cards, payroll deposits,
petty cash
 Inadequate financial controls
 Decentralized system for payment
approval
Theft of client funds
Focus on financial management :
 Does an attorney approve the bill to be
paid?
 Does an attorney authorize checks for
payment?
 Does an attorney sign expense checks?
 Does the firm routinely audit financial
procedures?
Take-aways
 Put most fee agreements into writing early.
Know your options.
 For anything looking like “advance” payment,
touch all the bases; fly-speck the documents;
read the rules for detail, not just gist.
 Get money up front when you can, and keep it
topped off, evergreen.
 But have and use a trust account.
 If you delegate, stay aware & keep control.
Take-aways
 Trust accounts are not too onerous to handle, and don’t have “gotcha”s.
 Lawyers get into bad trouble when they DON’T have or DON’T use trust accounts – when
theyAVOID using trust accounts.
 Lawyers DON’T generally get into trouble for small, periodic little slip-ups in the trust
accounts themselves.
 The courts are lenient on occasional negligence; hard on intentional avoidance.
 “Just do it,” (“it” being a three-way reconciliation) at least once a month. There has never
been a lawyer disciplined for trust account violations who used the account with subsidiary
ledgers, did a three-way reconciliation monthly & could show his monthly print-outs.
 Use the OLPR advisory opinion service.
 Watch out for “easy money”; don’t be pushed into issuing checks too fast.
 Know the difference between “funds available” and “check cleared.”
 Have guard-rails, checks & controls to reduce temptation and “blind spots.”
 Delegate, but supervise.
Thank you!
Todd C. Scott
VP Risk Management
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Ins Co
Michael Trittipo
Attorney Editor
Minnesota State Bar Association

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Lease financing FN 744 (Elimring Moshi) +2557-14112-062
Lease financing FN 744 (Elimring Moshi) +2557-14112-062Lease financing FN 744 (Elimring Moshi) +2557-14112-062
Lease financing FN 744 (Elimring Moshi) +2557-14112-062
Elimringi Moshi
 
Wb consultant 4b
Wb consultant 4bWb consultant 4b
Wb consultant 4b
Joy Irman
 
Landlord Tenant Law Handout 2
Landlord Tenant Law Handout 2Landlord Tenant Law Handout 2
Landlord Tenant Law Handout 2
nbam19
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

LeTran.Litigation Law Review. No.5/2018
LeTran.Litigation Law Review. No.5/2018LeTran.Litigation Law Review. No.5/2018
LeTran.Litigation Law Review. No.5/2018
 
Payment principles
Payment principlesPayment principles
Payment principles
 
The Financial Function of Real Estate Property Management by LL Realty
The Financial Function of Real Estate Property Management by LL RealtyThe Financial Function of Real Estate Property Management by LL Realty
The Financial Function of Real Estate Property Management by LL Realty
 
Itm.leasing
Itm.leasing Itm.leasing
Itm.leasing
 
Lease financing FN 744 (Elimring Moshi) +2557-14112-062
Lease financing FN 744 (Elimring Moshi) +2557-14112-062Lease financing FN 744 (Elimring Moshi) +2557-14112-062
Lease financing FN 744 (Elimring Moshi) +2557-14112-062
 
Arbitration and conciliation amnedment 2015
Arbitration and conciliation amnedment 2015Arbitration and conciliation amnedment 2015
Arbitration and conciliation amnedment 2015
 
Settling tax disputes
Settling tax disputesSettling tax disputes
Settling tax disputes
 
REO Lifecycle Session at CCIM Live!
REO Lifecycle Session at CCIM Live!REO Lifecycle Session at CCIM Live!
REO Lifecycle Session at CCIM Live!
 
Leases
LeasesLeases
Leases
 
LEASE & ITS TYPES
LEASE & ITS TYPESLEASE & ITS TYPES
LEASE & ITS TYPES
 
Arbitration ppt mba
Arbitration ppt  mbaArbitration ppt  mba
Arbitration ppt mba
 
Arbitration Proceeding (Working Guidlines)
Arbitration Proceeding (Working Guidlines)Arbitration Proceeding (Working Guidlines)
Arbitration Proceeding (Working Guidlines)
 
AMENDMENT IN ARBITRATION LAW IN INDIA 2016
AMENDMENT IN ARBITRATION LAW IN INDIA 2016AMENDMENT IN ARBITRATION LAW IN INDIA 2016
AMENDMENT IN ARBITRATION LAW IN INDIA 2016
 
Adr before and after pandemic
Adr before and after pandemicAdr before and after pandemic
Adr before and after pandemic
 
Wb consultant 4b
Wb consultant 4bWb consultant 4b
Wb consultant 4b
 
ARBITRATION & CONCILIATION ACT 2015 Capt. Pankaj Kapoor
ARBITRATION & CONCILIATION ACT 2015 Capt. Pankaj KapoorARBITRATION & CONCILIATION ACT 2015 Capt. Pankaj Kapoor
ARBITRATION & CONCILIATION ACT 2015 Capt. Pankaj Kapoor
 
Landlord Tenant Law Handout 2
Landlord Tenant Law Handout 2Landlord Tenant Law Handout 2
Landlord Tenant Law Handout 2
 
Software contracts
Software contractsSoftware contracts
Software contracts
 
Leasing1
Leasing1Leasing1
Leasing1
 
Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 (amdt) ordinance
Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 (amdt) ordinanceArbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 (amdt) ordinance
Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 (amdt) ordinance
 

Ähnlich wie The ethics of getting paid: fee agreements and trust accounts

TRID_PocketGuide12-small
TRID_PocketGuide12-smallTRID_PocketGuide12-small
TRID_PocketGuide12-small
Joe Stevens
 
Negotiable instrument negotiable instrument act
Negotiable instrument    negotiable instrument actNegotiable instrument    negotiable instrument act
Negotiable instrument negotiable instrument act
Moazzam Habib
 
XFS Financial Considerations
XFS Financial ConsiderationsXFS Financial Considerations
XFS Financial Considerations
Jessie Wade
 
FCS 3450 HOMEWORK #41.Thomas Franklin arrived at the following t.docx
FCS 3450 HOMEWORK #41.Thomas Franklin arrived at the following t.docxFCS 3450 HOMEWORK #41.Thomas Franklin arrived at the following t.docx
FCS 3450 HOMEWORK #41.Thomas Franklin arrived at the following t.docx
mydrynan
 

Ähnlich wie The ethics of getting paid: fee agreements and trust accounts (20)

Ethical Billing Practices and Retainer Agreements for Lawyers
Ethical Billing Practices and Retainer Agreements for LawyersEthical Billing Practices and Retainer Agreements for Lawyers
Ethical Billing Practices and Retainer Agreements for Lawyers
 
Drafting Legal Notice and what are its essentials.pptx
Drafting Legal Notice and what are its essentials.pptxDrafting Legal Notice and what are its essentials.pptx
Drafting Legal Notice and what are its essentials.pptx
 
Contracts.pptx
Contracts.pptxContracts.pptx
Contracts.pptx
 
The 7 golden rules of collections
The 7 golden rules of collectionsThe 7 golden rules of collections
The 7 golden rules of collections
 
LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022 - How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary ...
LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022 - How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary ...LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022 - How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary ...
LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022 - How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary ...
 
Invoicing and Collecting for your Legal Services
Invoicing and Collecting for your Legal ServicesInvoicing and Collecting for your Legal Services
Invoicing and Collecting for your Legal Services
 
Fee agreement
Fee agreementFee agreement
Fee agreement
 
TRID_PocketGuide12-small
TRID_PocketGuide12-smallTRID_PocketGuide12-small
TRID_PocketGuide12-small
 
Paying for Litigation- Hourly, Contingency, Third Party Financing & More (Ser...
Paying for Litigation- Hourly, Contingency, Third Party Financing & More (Ser...Paying for Litigation- Hourly, Contingency, Third Party Financing & More (Ser...
Paying for Litigation- Hourly, Contingency, Third Party Financing & More (Ser...
 
Law Office Administration & Organization
Law Office Administration & OrganizationLaw Office Administration & Organization
Law Office Administration & Organization
 
Cfs standard agreement
Cfs standard agreementCfs standard agreement
Cfs standard agreement
 
Ethics For EP, Probate & Trust Lawyers
Ethics For EP, Probate & Trust LawyersEthics For EP, Probate & Trust Lawyers
Ethics For EP, Probate & Trust Lawyers
 
Gst on legal 2
Gst on legal 2Gst on legal 2
Gst on legal 2
 
RECEIVED A SUMMONS- WHAT NOW?
RECEIVED A SUMMONS- WHAT NOW?RECEIVED A SUMMONS- WHAT NOW?
RECEIVED A SUMMONS- WHAT NOW?
 
Increasing Intensity to achieve collection
Increasing Intensity to achieve collectionIncreasing Intensity to achieve collection
Increasing Intensity to achieve collection
 
Paying the bankruptcy lawyer
Paying the bankruptcy lawyerPaying the bankruptcy lawyer
Paying the bankruptcy lawyer
 
Negotiable instrument negotiable instrument act
Negotiable instrument    negotiable instrument actNegotiable instrument    negotiable instrument act
Negotiable instrument negotiable instrument act
 
Negotiable instrument act 1881 & Types of Negotiable Instrument
Negotiable instrument act 1881 & Types of Negotiable Instrument Negotiable instrument act 1881 & Types of Negotiable Instrument
Negotiable instrument act 1881 & Types of Negotiable Instrument
 
XFS Financial Considerations
XFS Financial ConsiderationsXFS Financial Considerations
XFS Financial Considerations
 
FCS 3450 HOMEWORK #41.Thomas Franklin arrived at the following t.docx
FCS 3450 HOMEWORK #41.Thomas Franklin arrived at the following t.docxFCS 3450 HOMEWORK #41.Thomas Franklin arrived at the following t.docx
FCS 3450 HOMEWORK #41.Thomas Franklin arrived at the following t.docx
 

Mehr von Minnesota State Bar Association

Introduction to Document Assembly
Introduction to Document AssemblyIntroduction to Document Assembly
Introduction to Document Assembly
Minnesota State Bar Association
 

Mehr von Minnesota State Bar Association (8)

MSBA By The Numbers
MSBA By The NumbersMSBA By The Numbers
MSBA By The Numbers
 
2017-18 Diversity and Inclusion Annual Report
2017-18 Diversity and Inclusion Annual Report2017-18 Diversity and Inclusion Annual Report
2017-18 Diversity and Inclusion Annual Report
 
Civil Legal Aid in Minnesota 2017
Civil Legal Aid in Minnesota 2017Civil Legal Aid in Minnesota 2017
Civil Legal Aid in Minnesota 2017
 
MN Find a Lawyer - Help potential clients find you
MN Find a Lawyer - Help potential clients find youMN Find a Lawyer - Help potential clients find you
MN Find a Lawyer - Help potential clients find you
 
From Purchase Agreement to Recorded Deed - Document Assembly in Real Property...
From Purchase Agreement to Recorded Deed - Document Assembly in Real Property...From Purchase Agreement to Recorded Deed - Document Assembly in Real Property...
From Purchase Agreement to Recorded Deed - Document Assembly in Real Property...
 
Advanced Legal Research Tips - Boolean Searches and More
Advanced Legal Research Tips - Boolean Searches and More  Advanced Legal Research Tips - Boolean Searches and More
Advanced Legal Research Tips - Boolean Searches and More
 
Introduction to Document Assembly
Introduction to Document AssemblyIntroduction to Document Assembly
Introduction to Document Assembly
 
How to Handle Your IOLTA Accounting
How to Handle Your IOLTA Accounting  How to Handle Your IOLTA Accounting
How to Handle Your IOLTA Accounting
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Contract law. Indemnity
Contract law.                     IndemnityContract law.                     Indemnity
Contract law. Indemnity
mahikaanand16
 
Code_Ethics of_Mechanical_Engineering.ppt
Code_Ethics of_Mechanical_Engineering.pptCode_Ethics of_Mechanical_Engineering.ppt
Code_Ethics of_Mechanical_Engineering.ppt
JosephCanama
 
一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理
Airst S
 
一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理
bd2c5966a56d
 
一比一原版伦敦南岸大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版伦敦南岸大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版伦敦南岸大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版伦敦南岸大学毕业证如何办理
Airst S
 
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdfAppeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
PoojaGadiya1
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptx
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptxKEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptx
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptx
 
Contract law. Indemnity
Contract law.                     IndemnityContract law.                     Indemnity
Contract law. Indemnity
 
Performance of contract-1 law presentation
Performance of contract-1 law presentationPerformance of contract-1 law presentation
Performance of contract-1 law presentation
 
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULELITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
 
Code_Ethics of_Mechanical_Engineering.ppt
Code_Ethics of_Mechanical_Engineering.pptCode_Ethics of_Mechanical_Engineering.ppt
Code_Ethics of_Mechanical_Engineering.ppt
 
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptxMOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
 
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statuteThe doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
 
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptxMunicipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
Municipal-Council-Ratlam-vs-Vardi-Chand-A-Landmark-Writ-Case.pptx
 
3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt
3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt
3 Formation of Company.www.seribangash.com.ppt
 
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptxPPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
 
IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016)-IOD - PPT.pptx
IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016)-IOD - PPT.pptxIBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016)-IOD - PPT.pptx
IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016)-IOD - PPT.pptx
 
一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证如何办理
 
Hely-Hutchinson v. Brayhead Ltd .pdf
Hely-Hutchinson v. Brayhead Ltd         .pdfHely-Hutchinson v. Brayhead Ltd         .pdf
Hely-Hutchinson v. Brayhead Ltd .pdf
 
一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理
 
一比一原版伦敦南岸大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版伦敦南岸大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版伦敦南岸大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版伦敦南岸大学毕业证如何办理
 
Presentation on Corporate SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY- PPT.pptx
Presentation on Corporate SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY- PPT.pptxPresentation on Corporate SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY- PPT.pptx
Presentation on Corporate SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY- PPT.pptx
 
ARTICLE 370 PDF about the indian constitution.
ARTICLE 370 PDF about the  indian constitution.ARTICLE 370 PDF about the  indian constitution.
ARTICLE 370 PDF about the indian constitution.
 
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdfAppeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
 
Clarifying Land Donation Issues Memo for
Clarifying Land Donation Issues Memo forClarifying Land Donation Issues Memo for
Clarifying Land Donation Issues Memo for
 
BPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdf
BPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdfBPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdf
BPA GROUP 7 - DARIO VS. MISON REPORTING.pdf
 

The ethics of getting paid: fee agreements and trust accounts

  • 1. One Profession, May 17, 2019: The ethics of getting paid: fee agreements and trust accounts Todd C. Scott VP Risk Management Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Ins Co Michael Trittipo Attorney Editor Minnesota State Bar Association
  • 2. 1. Have a fee agreement ◦ A. Know your choices. ◦ B. Put it in writing ◦ C. Do it right (dotting “i”s & crossing “t”s) 2. Have a trust account ◦ A. Use it ◦ B. Use it right (where, when, how, why for what, whose money) ◦ C. Put it in writing (at least monthly) 3. Avoid scams (from far or near) ◦ A. Know a little UCC ◦ B. Do some digging (a/k/a due diligence) ◦ C. Trust – but verify; don’t create temptations Focus today:
  • 3. First two subject to rules: 1. Have a fee agreement – RPR 1.5(b) 2. Have a trust account – RPR 1.15 & Appendix 1
  • 4. Third from statute and best practices: 1. Have a fee agreement – RPR 1.5(b) 2. Have a trust account – RPR 1.15 & Appendix 1 3. Scams? ◦ From outside – UCC, Minn. Stat. ch. 336, art. 3 (negotiable instruments) ◦ From inside – best practices on separation of powers, esp. as to money, but see also RPR 5.3 (delegate – but supervise well)
  • 5. Why focus on fee agreements? • Most common source of admonitions (per OLPR 4/2018) • Within your control • To your benefit that client “get it” clearly • Can help you avoid many potential problems
  • 6. What can a lawyer charge?
  • 7. What can a lawyer charge? … [(b) & (c) address communicating the fee basis, the not-yet-earned presumption, and contingencies]
  • 8. What can a lawyer charge?  A division of fee between lawyers who are not in the same firm may be made only if:  (1) in proportion to the services performed by each lawyer or, by written agreement with the client, each lawyer assumes joint responsibility for the representation;  (2) the client is advised of the share that each lawyer is to receive and does not object to the participation of all the lawyers involved; and  (3) the total fee is reasonable.
  • 9. Billing arrangements Did you know? It is not required to have a written contract for hourly fee legal services… But it is a really, really, really, really good idea…
  • 10. Billing arrangements Why? It is still considered good public policy to allow lawyers and clients to have an oral agreement to perform legal services, especially when things should happen quickly.
  • 11. Billing arrangements When is a written contract required? Retainer agreements Flat fee agreements Contingency fee agreements
  • 12. Billing arrangements Memorializing the entire legal services arrangement: First: Engagement agreement and letter; OR First: Non-engagement agreement Last: Closing letter
  • 13. Billing arrangements The engagement agreement must have: Date of start of legal services Names of person(s) contracting for services Scope of legal services Fees (if any) being charged: basis or rate Any other requirements necessary to proceed
  • 14. Billing arrangements The non-engagement agreement should have: Affirmative statement you are not representing the client in their legal matter. General warning that time limits may be tolling on their matter and they should consult with other attorneys immediately.
  • 15. Billing arrangements Q. Why are non-engagement letters so important? A. You want to be able to prove that an attorney- client relationship never was formed, therefore you had no fiduciary duty to the person. Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe, 291 N.W. 2d 686 (1980)
  • 16. Billing arrangements More information (including template) available at: https://www.mlmins.com/Library /Non-Engagement%20Guide.pdf
  • 17. Billing arrangements The closing letter should have: Date of the letter. Affirmative statement that the matter has concluded and you are no longer representing the client. Q. Why is this so important? A. You want to clearly identify the last day of the legal representation
  • 18. 1. Hourly fee: An agreed upon rate of payment owed by the client that is calculated by the number of hours the attorney works on the client’s matter. Tracking billable time: The hourly fee is usually calculated in tenths of an hour and the lawyer is permitted to have minimum hourly fees if it is included ion the writing.
  • 19. 1. Hourly fee: An agreed upon rate of payment owed by the client that is calculated by the number of hours the attorney works on the client’s matter. How rates are determined: The lawyer and client can agree to any hourly rate, and it is not required that an agreement be in writing. However, it is a good idea to have the fee agreement in writing in case there is a misunderstanding about the fee between the lawyer and client. Hourly fee invoicing: The invoice needs to be in writing but invoice by email other electronic means is permitted.
  • 20. 2. Hourly fee with retainer payment: An agreed upon rate of payment owed by the client that is calculated by the number of hours the attorney works on the client’s matter. The client also agrees to pay the lawyer in advance a sum of money that will be held in trust, but which the lawyer may earn. How the fee is earned: For the lawyer to earn the retainer money, the work must be completed and the client must be notified in writing. How the fee is billed: Once properly earned, the lawyer can transfer money from the retainer out of trust and into the firm’s general account.
  • 21. 3. Flat fee: The final fee owed to the lawyer is a certain set amount that the client will pay at the start of the matter. Flat fees are more frequently used in domestic case, criminal, and immigration legal matters. Flat fee agreement: Lawyers charging flat fees will carefully identify, in writing for the client, what services the client will receive in exchange for the flat fee amount.
  • 22. 3. Flat fee: The final fee owed to the lawyer is a certain set amount that the client will pay at the start of the matter. Flat fees are more frequently used in domestic case, criminal, and immigration legal matters. Non-refundable fees: Not permitted under Minnesota rules. Sometimes allowed in other jurisdictions. (More detail & tips on this point to follow)
  • 23. 3. Flat fee: The final fee owed to the lawyer is a certain set amount that the client will pay at the start of the matter. Flat fees are more frequently used in domestic case, criminal, and immigration legal matters. Legal flat fee menu: A list of flat fees for basic legal services.
  • 24. 4. Contingency Fee: The final fee owed to the lawyer is contingent upon the outcome of the case. Often the fee is a percentage (25%, 33%, 40%) of the whatever the client collects as a part of the case. How expenses are handled: Case costs or expenses are often added to the fee. Case costs are out-of-pocket expenses the lawyer may have incurred from 3rd parties while working on behalf of the client.
  • 25. Hourly Fee Hourly with Retainer Flat fee Contingency Fee No written agreement required. Agreement must be in writing. Agreement must be in writing. Agreement must be in writing. Billed monthly. Billed monthly. May be billed once. May be billed once. Expenses added to legal fee. Expenses added to legal fee. Expenses added to legal fee. Expenses added to legal fee. 4 types of fee structures
  • 26. Basic hourly legal bill There is no requirement for how the bill should look. This bill is written on firm letterhead. The goal is to make the bill understandable. The fewer questions the client has, the more likely they are to pay the bill in a timely way. Extended, specific descriptions may be more convincing than cryptic, generic ones. (To judges, too, in fee-award cases.)
  • 27. Basic hourly legal bill with retainer balance The invoice will usually have all of the attributes of an ordinary hourly bill, but also:  Trust account section showing prior balance (before invoice) and current balance (after invoicing.)
  • 28. Basic flat fee bill The invoice will usually have:  Firm name at top  Recipient’s name  Date of invoice  Invoice number  Date of legal services  Description of legal services  Total amount due
  • 29. Basic contingency settlement statement The statement will usually have:  Firm name at top  Recipient’s name of name of case  Settlement amount  Attorneys fee with percentage agreement  Payments to others  Expenses owed by client  Net to client
  • 30. Advance planning for “advance” fees Rule 1.15(b): … Except as provided below, fee payments received by a lawyer before legal services have been rendered are presumed to be unearned and shall be held in a trust account pursuant to Rule 1.15. (1) A lawyer may charge a flat fee for specified legal services, which constitutes complete payment for those services and may be paid in whole or in part in advance of the lawyer providing the services. If agreed to in advance in a written fee agreement signed by the client, a flat fee shall be considered to be the lawyer’s property upon payment of the fee, subject to refund as described in Rule 1.5(b)(3). Such a written fee agreement shall notify the client: (i) of the nature and scope of the services to be provided; (ii) of the total amount of the fee and the terms of payment; (iii) that the fee will not be held in a trust account until earned; (iv) that the client has the right to terminate the client-lawyer relationship; and (v) that the client will be entitled to a refund of all or a portion of the fee if the agreed- upon legal services are not provided. (2) [“Availability” fees] (3) Fee agreements may not describe any fee as nonrefundable or earned upon receipt but may describe the advance fee payment as the lawyer’s property subject to refund. …
  • 31. Advance planning for “advance” fees 1) Only as complete payment for specified services (Flat-fee or defined-scope, not open-ended hourly.) 2) Can’t say “non-refundable” or “earned upon receipt” (or “24 hours later,” etc.) 3) May say “the lawyer’s property, subject to refund” (but “my property” ≠ “earned.”) 4) Must give five (5) specific notices 5) Only fees for service, NOT client money advanced for costs (e.g., filing or recording fees. Those must still go into a trust account.) Rule 1.15(b)(3): Fee agreements may not describe any fee as nonrefundable or earned upon receipt but may describe the advance fee payment as the lawyer’s property subject to refund. … In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Torgerson, 870 N.W.2d 602 (Minn., 2015) The fees aren’t earned until the specified services are actually completed.
  • 32. What’s the motivation? 1) To avoid having a trust account just because you think it’s hard to do it right? Reconsider! Having and using a trust account and doing the record-keeping is not that hard. 2) Being sure one’s dotted all the “i”s and crossed all the “t”s for advance fees is actually more onerous – and failure on any Rule 1.5(b) element can be disastrous.
  • 33. What’s the motivation? Accidental occasional slip-ups in record-keeping for trust accounts are often handled with only private admonitions. The most severe treatment in any Minnesota Supreme Court decision of the past two years for merely inadvertent “misappropriation” alone has been a public reprimand and two years probation. In contrast, messing up even a single element required for taking money in advance without using a trust account typically creates an intentional, not just negligent, violation. The intentional act is choosing to put the money into the business account instead of into a trust account. And intentional misappropriation, even of only a couple hundred dollars, can be sufficient basis on its own for disbarment.
  • 34. Summary on fee agreements  Have written fee agreements to avoid misunderstandings about bills.  Ensure your fees are reasonable: review the criteria in Rule 1.5  Get sufficient retainers, but use a trust account; they’re not scary or hard, & they can shield you  Think twice before suing a client for fees: it often results in a counter-claim  Arbitrate fee disputes to avoid client lawsuits
  • 35. Trust accounts  Why you need one  What you need to do  Where to open an account  What kind of account(s) to open  What books & records are needed  How you create and keep those in order  Where to find how-to’s & help
  • 36. Why? Not just a modern nanny “bureaucratic” requirement Historical and international comparisons ◦ Beginning ca. 13th century in Europe ◦ European requirements now: like U.S. or more stringent Compare: ◦ Wisconsin 2016 amendments ◦ Minnesota pre-1975 ◦ Minnesota now Structural issue: money an inherent conflict; plus a power/information imbalance (who has access to do what) – so fiduciary duties
  • 37. Why? Reasons go back centuries (even millennia) Roman and Greek antipathy to lawyers– especially to lawyers asking for or receiving compensation at all Early European antipathy over compensation ◦ Icelandic sagas (ca. 13th cent.) “After accepting a[n expensive] ring at the initial consultation, Eyjolf [the lawyer, told his client] ‘Be most careful not to say that ye have given goods for my help.’” The Story of Burnt Njal (Sir George Webbe Dusent trans., 1971), n.137. Not just money (ambidexterity) – but it played a role
  • 38. Why? In N.A., too, tension over lawyers being paid ◦ Issues not unique to Old World or medieval times ◦ Roughly 1650-1720, American colonies like Virginia and Carolina (most) often made “mercenary” lawyers illegal “[It is] a base and vile thing to plead for money or reward; nor shall anyone (except he be a near kinsman…) be permitted to plead another man's cause, till … he hath taken an oath, that he doth not plead for money or reward ….” The Fundamental Constitutions of Carolina (1669), § 70. 2 Poore, note 48, at 1404 ◦ Maybe a feature of Utopias generally (incl. Sir Thomas More’s, but also aspiring ones)
  • 39. Why? Resolution: trust, but verify (require accounting) Court’s recognized lawyers had a duty toaccount to clients (and to disciplinary authorities) “Account” was non-technical: simply to tell what happened to the money, what was done But since it is money, counting’s involved, too. (Shakespeare mentions “counters” twice.) Lawyers remain unpopular (Henry VI), but clients can demand an accounting – so lawyers must be prepared to give an account (to tell what happened, to the penny).
  • 40. Two duties: ◦ actually safekeeping the property (avoiding commingling, using separate accounts to protect from own creditors, etc.), and ◦ keeping the right records to show it, i.e., to be able to give an account (no “no harm, no foul” rule) (essentially the duty of loyalty or honesty for the first, and the duties of diligence and competence for the second)
  • 41. Short answer: Rule 1.15 says so ◦ (a) ”All funds of clients or third persons held by a lawyer or law firm in connection with a representation shall be deposited in one or more identifiable trust accounts ….” ◦ (c)(3) “A lawyer shall: … maintain complete records of all funds … of a client or third person coming into the possession of the lawyer and render appropriate accounts to the client or third person regarding them ….” ◦ (h) “Every lawyer engaged in private practice of law shall maintain or cause to be maintained on a current basis, books and records sufficient to … establish compliance with paragraphs (a) through (f).
  • 42. What’s “complete” or “sufficient”? ◦(c)(3) “A lawyer shall: … maintain complete records ◦ (h) “… [and] on a current basis … books and records sufficient to … establish compliance with paragraphs (a) through (f).” … ?
  • 43. What’s “complete” or “sufficient”? ◦ Q: 1.15(c)(3) “A lawyer shall: … maintain complete records (h) “… [and] books and records sufficient to … establish compliance with paragraphs (a) through (f).” … Tell me more? ◦ A: 1.15(i) … “The Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board shall publish annually the books and records required [by (h)].” ◦ It does so by “Appendix 1.” Re-read each year.
  • 44. Rule 1.15: “Amended Dec. 27, 1989 …, July 28, 1999 …, June 17, 2005 …, Dec. 21, 2006 …, effective July 1, 2010; effective July 1, 2011 … Appendix 1 may change each year even if Rule 1.15 doesn’t ◦ 2015 amendments re reconciliation date, method of handling negative balances, “separately maintained,” etc. Every year, you certify that you’re in compliance. That’s a sworn statement, and disciplinable on its own if not true. Re-read regularly for changes —both Rule 1.15 & Appendix 1
  • 45. App. 1, 2015 amendments
  • 46. App. 1, 2015 amendments
  • 47. 2015 amendments, highlights Trial balance used to be required as of “the end of each month,” but 2015 changed that to “as of the date of the monthly bank statement.” Allowed PDFs as “print-outs,” needn’t be on paper with ink Books and records must be maintained “ separately … for each individual trust account.” (“May factor into … whether to open a separate interest-bearing account ….”) (Read “individual” as “distinct,” not as “non-pooled.”) Set ceiling on “nominal” funds of lawyer in trust account at$200.00 specifically. Added specific detail on how, during reconciliation, to treat any negative balance found in a client ledger. Added credit cards provisions; required a check number in register “Director does not consider overdrafts caused by a lawyer issuing funds from a trust account prior to the deposit instrument clearing to be bank error.”
  • 48. That looks hard. I’ll risk 1.15(b)’s pitfalls! Balderdash. Can be done with a check register & paper ledgers, or simple spreadsheets Many software choices to make it even easier Don’t treat “hard” as an excuse to delegate* it until you’ve done it yourself * And never confuse “delegate” with “abdicate”
  • 49. How to do it: six easy steps ◦ Go to an OLPR-approved bank (“financial institution”). (1.15(d,j)) ◦ Open an IOLTA account.* ◦ Name it, including “trust account” (explicitly, with those words) ◦ Puts world (creditors) on notice: not your firm’s money ◦ Make its checks a : not required but a good idea ◦ Deposit most money your get from or for clients into it. ◦ Pay most matters’ expenses & your fees out of it. ◦ Keep complete records** on what goes in & out. * If you need a different type, you’ll know
  • 50. Spoiler alert: Two (2) main things lawyers don’t do that get them into trouble. Two. 1) Not keeping “client matter subsidiary ledgers.” 2) Not doing a three-way (3-way) reconciliation each month.
  • 51. How-to: paper and Ink • Recommended by Jay Foonberg in ABA guide, as a foundation or background before computerizing. (So you know what records should look like. “It’s the software’s|accountant’s fault!” No.) • Described in an Ill. Att’y Registr’n & Disciplinary Commiss’n guide: – http://www.iardc.org/clienttrusthandbook_toc.html • And in California: – http://www.calbar.ca.gov/calbar/pdfs/ethics/2003_CTA_Handbook.pdf
  • 52. How to: paper and ink: LPRB guide “Other People’s Money: Operating Lawyer Trust Accounts”
  • 53. How-to: paper and ink: LPRB guide “Other People’s Money: Operating Lawyer Trust Accounts” Simple; easy to understand Main downsides to manual entry on paper: 1) need to enter every amount twice (two places: “double entry”) 2) manual/mental/calc addition & subtraction (just 3rd grade math)
  • 54. How-to, using software Software saves the double-entry: enter any amount just ONCE, and say just ONCE which client matter it involves. Some software requires you to set up a “chart of accounts”; other software does an equivalent for you behind the scenes, based on you telling it (1) the clients & matters you’re holding money for, and (2) what bank account the money is in. Easy. The MSBA has guides for specific programs of both types.
  • 55. How-to: MSBA guides QuickBooks Desktop & Online; Cosmolex; TrustBooks; Tabs3; Xero; GnuCash; …
  • 56. How-to basics, easy overview (same whether paper or software) A. Every day you need these two books*: ◦ 1) check register – with a running balance ◦ 2) “matter subsidiary ledgers” – with running balances B. Once a month you receive a bank statement. C. When you do, ◦ 1) reconcile your check register with the bank statement ◦ 2) add up the “matter subsidiary ledgers” balances ◦ 3) verify that (a) the total sum from step 2 matches (b) your check register’s and (c) the “adjusted” bank statement balance’s (three amounts must all match) ◦ “Print” your work to prove you did it. Print: (1) the check register, (2) the “trial balance,” and (3) the three-way (not just two-way) reconciliation. Keep the monthly “print-outs.” D. If all three (3) balances don’t match, fix it. * “Books” are what you do; “records” are what the bank gives you. Close enough.
  • 57. How-to main details, paper or software ◦ 1) for each entry in the check register show: ◦ the date ◦ the amount ◦ who to, & number, if it’s a check* ◦ the client & matter it’s for ◦ the purpose (briefly) ◦ and the running balance (software will do for you) ◦ 2) each entry in each client matter subsidiary ledger must show the same (but the client & matter is already obvious) ◦ 3) you will also need two more “subsidiary ledgers”: one for interest (IF it’s not always zero), and one for a “nominal” amount of your fees: under $200 * Even for deposits, it’s good to show the source, even if not required. This is how software saves you work.
  • 58. How-to on 3-way reconciliation – Part 1 ◦ First reconcile two amounts: (1) the “adjusted“ bank statement balance, with (2) your check register balance -- easy, familiar ◦ Should be no (zero) difference,. If not zero, find and fix.
  • 59. How-to on 3-way reconciliation – Part 2 ◦ Then make sure the same amount (as shown {1} in the bank statement and {2} your check register) equals {3} the sum of all current balances shown in the client subsidiary ledgers.
  • 60. How-to on 3-way reconciliation – ex. 1
  • 61. How-to on 3-way reconciliation – ex. 2 Check Register
  • 62. Reminder: Two (2) main things lawyers don’t do that get them into trouble. Two. 1) Not keeping “client matter subsidiary ledgers” (or not keeping them current) 2) Not doing a three-way (3-way) reconciliation each month. Do those monthly, and you’re pretty much good. Using legal-specific software like Cosmolex or Tabs3 makes it easier & gives you guard-rails (won’t let you write a check that might make any client subsidiary ledger have a negative balance, nor make a check or a deposit without assigning it to a specific client matter, etc.)
  • 63. How-to extra tip: never bypass your business account for earned fees • In re Miley, 486 N.W.2d 759 (Minn. 1992) (lawyer disciplined for personal use of a trust account) • First put earned fees into your operating account, then you can make checks to whomever out from it • But also: never leave earned fees in a trust account. No “cushions,” no commingling.
  • 64. How-to extra tip: credit cards • Credit cards can be a problem. • Taking credit cards may help some clients pay. • But typical issuer agreement gives issuer rights to unilaterally reverse transactions, debit accounts to which deposits were made, etc. – violating 1.15(j) • Solution 1: put into operating (business) account, with immediate transfer of unearned parts to trust account. Reversal then can only affect your operating account, not the trust account. • Solution 2: choose a service (e.g., Lawpay) that will guarantee not to ever withdraw from the trust account, only your business account
  • 65. How-to, final tips: • Always use separate books for business and trust accounts – KISS: Separate, separate, separate – Avoids opportunities for confusion or mistake: avoids seeing assets in operating accounts, & protects against overlooking trust account shortfalls; also prevents tax confusion • Always cash basis, never accrual (don’t get fancy; KISS) – What’s there, not what will be – Actual payments, not bills or anticipated bills • Mirror reality without mental or software gymnastics (KISS) – Use asset/liability whenever can, not income/expense – Be consistent; make it simple and routine
  • 66. How-to: Advisory opinions LPRB will answer questions about actions you are considering Must be asked in advance: prospective only Need to be sufficiently concrete and complete as to the facts http://lprb.mncourts.gov/LawyerResources/Pages/AdvisoryOpinions.aspxf (651) 296-3952
  • 67.
  • 69. Trust account scams How does the scam work?  Attorney hired to collect debt:  Real estate transaction  Tort claim  Divorce  Equipment leases  Fake check arrives at firm  Fake check is deposited in client trust  Attorney wires money from trust to foreign bank account
  • 70. Trust account scams Why does the scam work?  Attorney thinks check has “cleared”  Efforts to verify check fail  Scammer pressures the attorney to disburse funds.  Know the difference between “Check cleared” and “Available funds”
  • 71. Trust account scams • “Where the lawyer has reason to be concerned about whether a check being deposited will clear, the lawyer should not issue trust account checks against that deposit until he or she has confirmed with the issuing bank that the deposited check has cleared.” (emphasis added) – http://www.mncourts.gov/lprb/trustfaq.html • The FAQ’s phrasing is oddly soft. Really a “must not,” not just a “should not.” See App. 1: ◦ “Except in the context of real estate sales transactions, an attorney shall not disburse funds from a trust account unless the bank in which the attorney maintains the trust account has made the funds available for disbursement and the instrument that is the source of the deposit has cleared the bank account on which it was issued. (emphasis added)
  • 73. Theft of client funds KPMG Research:  Most theft conducted by fraudulent checks  Deposits made to employee’s own account  Deposits made to vendor accomplice  Access to: credit cards, payroll deposits, petty cash  Inadequate financial controls  Decentralized system for payment approval
  • 74. Theft of client funds Focus on financial management :  Does an attorney approve the bill to be paid?  Does an attorney authorize checks for payment?  Does an attorney sign expense checks?  Does the firm routinely audit financial procedures?
  • 75. Take-aways  Put most fee agreements into writing early. Know your options.  For anything looking like “advance” payment, touch all the bases; fly-speck the documents; read the rules for detail, not just gist.  Get money up front when you can, and keep it topped off, evergreen.  But have and use a trust account.  If you delegate, stay aware & keep control.
  • 76. Take-aways  Trust accounts are not too onerous to handle, and don’t have “gotcha”s.  Lawyers get into bad trouble when they DON’T have or DON’T use trust accounts – when theyAVOID using trust accounts.  Lawyers DON’T generally get into trouble for small, periodic little slip-ups in the trust accounts themselves.  The courts are lenient on occasional negligence; hard on intentional avoidance.  “Just do it,” (“it” being a three-way reconciliation) at least once a month. There has never been a lawyer disciplined for trust account violations who used the account with subsidiary ledgers, did a three-way reconciliation monthly & could show his monthly print-outs.  Use the OLPR advisory opinion service.  Watch out for “easy money”; don’t be pushed into issuing checks too fast.  Know the difference between “funds available” and “check cleared.”  Have guard-rails, checks & controls to reduce temptation and “blind spots.”  Delegate, but supervise.
  • 77. Thank you! Todd C. Scott VP Risk Management Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Ins Co Michael Trittipo Attorney Editor Minnesota State Bar Association