The basis for my poster session at Educause 2009 in Devner

1. Sakai 3: An Overview Michael Korcuska Executive Director Sakai Foundation

2. Sakai 3: Why? Changing expectations Google docs/apps, Social Networking, Web 2.0 Success of project sites = Sakai beyond courses New technologies Standards-based, open source projects JCR (Jackrabbit) Open Social (Shindig) Client-side programming JavaScript/AJAX Fluid Project (fluidproject.org) Years of hard-won knowledge 2

3. Why Now? Proto by Hubert Stoffels The time to repair the roof is when the sun is shining. John F. Kennedy

4. What? Photos by Hobvias Sudoneighm, Massimo Valiani, and Mathieu Plourde Functionality & User Experience Technology and Developer Experience Community Practices and Culture

5. End User perspective Sakai 3

6. Content Organization, Searching & Tagging Sakai 3 Themes 6 Learning Space Construction Breaking the Site Boundary Customizable Workflows (No Tool Silos) Academic Networking The unSakai Open Teaching

7. Learning Space Construction 1 Photos by Cyprien Lomas Really “Scholarly Space” Teaching & Learning plus…. Research, collaboration and portfolios Principles Embrace participant content creation Simple integration of interactive options Author(s) control presentation and workflow

8. Academic Spaces: Building Blocks Simple Content Authoring: Easy page creation (wiki-like) WYSIWYG Editing Templates (page and site) Versioning Enhanced with Academic Functionality Interactive Widgets (e.g. assignments & feedback) Allows integration of content and activities 8

9. Templates Templates provide scaffolding for majority of users But can be bypassed for advanced needs Page Templates Sections with (editable) content Site Templates Predefined pages and dashboards

10. Everything is Content Not just files to share Classic “resources” tool in Sakai (of course) Discussion post, user profile, test questions Taggable, searchable, linkable, portable, shareable Unified content repository Content not tied to site Everything in one storage area BUT: Sakai is not a full Content Management System No complex approval workflows No fancy layout capabilities Everyone is an author in Sakai 10 2

11. Content Management Sakai2 Photo by Desirée Delgado Site A Site B Users find things by remembering what site they were in when they saw it. 11

12. Content Management Sakai3 Photo by Amy Veeninga Tags: System, Organizational & User Permissions: Who has access, under what conditions Smart Folders Search 12

13. Academic Networking Academic Networking People are important, but “friends” aren’t enough Related content is also relevant, but not the whole story Activity based Who has taken the same classes? Who is reading the same articles? Participating in similar discussions? 13 3 Content People

14. Academic Networking A platform for exploration We aren’t competing with Facebook We do believe we need to drive R&D in this area Linking networks together Sakai to Sakai Sakai, Moodle, Blackboard, D2L Leveraging existing networks Particularly LinkedIn and Facebook Sharing profile and activity information Creating apps on those platforms Photo by Joël-Evelyñ-FrançoisDézafit-Keltz

15. The Site Boundary 15 4 All Art Students Studio Art 101 User 100 User 2 User 3 User 4 User 500 . . . User 1 User 2 User 3 User 4 User 5 . . . Year 1 Art Students Year 1 Art Students Users and groups exist within the context of a site.

16. Sakai 3 Groups & Sites Groups & Sites managed separately Member of a group – People with something in common Access to a site– Collection of content & functionality Support for hierarchy Art Dept. Art Majors Art Majors Studio 101 Students Studio 101 Guest Judges Student Work 16

18. Resists intuitive workflows

20. UX oversight is more complicated

21. Workflows built across services

22. Encourages presentation & service separationWorkflow

23. Academic Workflow Beyond Tool Silos Academic work flows often cross tool boundaries Anything can be graded! Anything can be discussed! This exists in Sakai 2 But it is too difficult and more needs to be done Example: Instructor puts into syllabus an assignment to create a discussionpost that will be graded. 4 tools for both instructors and students! 19 Photo by Zoom Zoom

24. Workflow Example 20 Select text & click “Create Assignment” All Media Images Videos Audio Forums Tests Site Pages Polls Jackson Response Forum (3 posts) Create Assignment… Name: Jackson Reading Response Due Date: September 10, 2009 Points: 10 (of 150) Type: Individual Description: Respond to the Jackson article in no more than 500 words. Post that response to the class discussion forum. Link To: Select... Class Intro Forum (27 posts) Forums Edit Assignment Information Some Other Forum (0 posts) Create Cancel Advanced Options… Link to Something Choose New…

25. Student View 21 Assignment: Jackson Reading Response Due Date: September 10, 2009 ( due tomorrow) Status: Not submitted Points: 10 possible (of 150). Description: Respond to the Jackson article in no more than 500 words. Post that response to the class discussion forum. Read more… Link(s): Jackson Response Discussion Forum (Create Post…)

26. Student View, Graded 22 Assignment: Jackson Reading Response Due Date: September 10, 2009 (due date passed) Status: Submitted and Graded Points: 9/10 (of 150). View feedback Description: Respond to the Jackson article in no more than 500 words. Post that response to the class discussion forum. Read more… Link(s): Jackson Response Discussion Forum (go to Forum now)

27. The unSakai Multiple Configurations Sakai as CMS Sakai as Collaboration System Sakai as Portfolio System Sakai Integrations Google Applications Social Networks (Open Social, Facebook) 23 6

28. The unSakai 24 Kernel Service Service Service iGoogle Facebook Kernel Service Service Service Documented data feeds allow Sakai to appear anywhere Mobile Apps Windows/Mac Widgets

29. Open Teaching Easy to make (parts of) course sites public or .auth Connections to OER repositories? Inbound, Outbound

30. Sakai 3 Functional Architecture Public Users Groups Collaboration Spaces Personal Spaces PLE Learning Research Project Portfolio Profile Meaningful Arrangements Dynamic, Collaborative Pages Dashboards Defined & Custom Workflows Fundamental Capabilities Wiki-like Content Editing Page Templates Interactive Widgets Unified Content Repository Authored Pages Uploaded Files Contextual Content

31. Sakai 3 Technology Why Sakai 3?

32. Sakai 3 Technology Goals Scalability Millions of users Developer Productivity Faster builds UX & back-end development separated Code Quality & Maintenance Reliance on other open source efforts Increase unit testing Easier to install/build To improve initial experience for new developers 28 Photo by Luiz Castro

33. Using Open Source Don’t write our own code If we can help it Criteria: Functionality License-compatible open source Open standard Approachable community

34. Sakai and Apache Sakai 3 Kernel built on Apache Sling RESTful web development framework for content management Sling incorporates Jackrabbit and Felix Everything as content Discussion post, User profile information, etc. Components put Content into JCR Content store Sakai Kernel creates relational indices in DB Component doesn’t need to do anything Automatic tracking of most events by kernel 30

35. Sling Mindset Everything as content Discussion post, User profile information, etc. Components put Content into JCR Content store Sakai Kernel creates relational indices in DB Component doesn’t need to do anything Automatic tracking of most events by kernel Philosophy similar to CouchDB Will require developer education

36. JSON Sakai Kernel supports JSON microformat Components use REST calls to interact with Kernel Benefits Back-end services stay Java-based UX programmers more often skilled in JavaScript Easier UX developers can work on Sakai Tools like GWT can be used for Java-based UI Components can be written using other languages 32

37. Community Practices

38. Community Practices Functional Leadership Design First Minimize Technology Frameworks Quality Focused Unit (and other) Tests

39. Timelines and adoption

40. Timelines 36 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Sakai 2.5 Sakai 2.6 Sakai 2.7 Hybrid Mode Sakai 3.0 Official Releases Previews Sakai 2.8?

41. Adopting Sakai Adopt 2 or 3? Not the first question to answer First Question: Yes! Or probably Do you want to be using Sakai (and be in the community) in the long run? We can help you figure out how to get there

42. Path to Sakai Straight to 3? Start with 2? It Depends! What did you expect? On what? Your production timeline Your appetite for “.0” software Your functional needs Your support model

43. Adopting 2 or 3? Sakai 2.6 or 2.7 Sakai 2 works well today 3 doesn’t exist yet Sakai 2 will be a good path to Sakai 3 Bb/WebCT migration to 2 is well known Many will be migrating from Sakai 2 to 3 Straight to Sakai 3 You don’t have a CMS or you are using something like SharePoint Your production timeline is 2012 or later You have a very strong preference for Sakai 3

44. Adopting 2 or 3? Maybe the wrong question Adopt both! Hybrid mode Sakai 2 for courses, Sakai 3 for project collaboration Gradually move users to Sakai 3