SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 4
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
pier                      62/63

 The redesign of Pier 62/63 on Seattle’s waterfront is a necessary change not only structurally but for the community as
 well. One of the main ways Seattle is defined is by the water and we are connected to it socially, economically, and
 environmentally. Seattle is a great urban environment, and we need a stand out urban waterfront to go with it. There has
 been a lot of talk and concept work done for the waterfront in its entirety, and some exciting ideas are being developed.
 This project deals only with the redesign of Pier 62 & 63. The goal for this new park is to provide a mixed use space that is
 meant for the full demographic, provides a focus on the water, and sticks to its roots while looking ahead to the future. Its
 main features include a 90’ high water installation that serves as public art as well as a water filtration system , a saltwater
 pool, a sandy ‘beach’, access to the water, picnic areas, grilling spaces, tennis courts as well as other sporting spaces, a
 running track, and a walkway connecting to the marina located at the next pier. The redesign also includes structural
 repairs that will change the timber pilings to more sustainable steel pilings.




concept                                           statement                                                                        interior designer
1.87 acres              discussed options
                                                       eis report
                                                       • rebuild/preservation alternative would rebuild pier 62/63 as a similar structure in the same location but set away approximately 50 feet from the shoreline.
                                                       • aqua link alternative would rebuild Piers 62/63 as a smaller structure closer to the aquarium would also build a new deck connecting piers 59 and 57.
                                                        this would be part of an aquarium expansion.
                                                       • connector alternative would rebuild the piers as a similar structure in the same location but set away from the shoreline. it would also build a footbridge/deck
                                                        connecting to the aquarium. an accessible beach between the new piers and the pier 60 would be added as well.
                                                       • multi-purpose pier alternative would rebuild Piers 62/63 as a large open platform right next to an expanded aquarium and set away from the shoreline.

                                                       allied-arts of seattle




                                                                                                                                                                                                                            62/63
                                                       • came up with the idea of the “people’s pier”, which is a family park, including an outdoor swimming pool, as well as basketball courts, public marina and a
                                                        renovated concert theater. this fits in with a redesign of the whole alaskan way waterfront.

                                                       public
                                                       • waterfront businesses have the most inquiries about a park space with grass to be able to sit, relax, and access to the water.


problem*
• pier 62/63 suffers extensive timber superstructure
  deterioration
• pile inspections show 38% of timber piles have
  heavy damage from fungal decay, biological
  deterioration, and marine borer damage, and
                                                                                                                                                                                     “the piers, with their long
  20% have moderate damage from these same                                                                                                                                           history of commerce, labor,
  reasons                                                                                                                                                                            and trade, are located on a
                                                                                                                                                                                     site originally used by native




                                                                                                                                                                                                                            pier
• continued deterioration of pilings could lead to
  extensive use restrictions in 2-5 years, depending                                                                                                                                 americans for landing their
  on the rate of decay                                                                                                                                                               boats, and were seen by the
• cannot support loading requirements for large                                                                                                                                      city as a new public access to
  events or heavy vehicles any longer                                                                                                                                                the waterfront”
• entire alaskan way seawall needs to be replaced                                                                                                                                    -a field guide to seattle’s
• overall condition of pier 62/63 was ‘fair-poor’                                                                                                                                    public art
  according to an engineering report from 2004

*information gathered from EIS (environmental
 impact statement) report for the central
 waterfront master parks plan from 2006




research
62/63
                      pier
concept development
a
                                                   in
                                                  ar
                                               m
                                             to




                                                            62/63
                      1




                  2

                                     4

                  3
                          8
                                                   a
                                                  in
                                                 ar
                                              m
                                            to




                                6
                  5




                                                            pier
                              1. saltwater pool
                              2. beach
                              3. picnic/grill section
              7               4. sports section
                              5. tennis courts
                              6. picnic/grill section
                              7. bike racks
          m




                              8. waterfall fixture
      riu
     ua
 aq
to




perspectives

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Functional Assessment Cont
Functional Assessment ContFunctional Assessment Cont
Functional Assessment Cont
sarath2008
 
Upper Riverfront Map+Timeline Presentation (24-25 May 2011)
Upper Riverfront Map+Timeline Presentation (24-25 May 2011)Upper Riverfront Map+Timeline Presentation (24-25 May 2011)
Upper Riverfront Map+Timeline Presentation (24-25 May 2011)
RiverFirst Initiative
 

Was ist angesagt? (6)

Ss 5 design_trust
Ss 5 design_trustSs 5 design_trust
Ss 5 design_trust
 
02 site layout map
02 site layout map02 site layout map
02 site layout map
 
Cox.CutSheets2015
Cox.CutSheets2015Cox.CutSheets2015
Cox.CutSheets2015
 
Functional Assessment Cont
Functional Assessment ContFunctional Assessment Cont
Functional Assessment Cont
 
Bmp terraces
Bmp terracesBmp terraces
Bmp terraces
 
Upper Riverfront Map+Timeline Presentation (24-25 May 2011)
Upper Riverfront Map+Timeline Presentation (24-25 May 2011)Upper Riverfront Map+Timeline Presentation (24-25 May 2011)
Upper Riverfront Map+Timeline Presentation (24-25 May 2011)
 

Ähnlich wie Portfolio Book 2 (7)

Otc16699
Otc16699Otc16699
Otc16699
 
harborengineering-200428164114 (1).pdf
harborengineering-200428164114 (1).pdfharborengineering-200428164114 (1).pdf
harborengineering-200428164114 (1).pdf
 
QB Poster4
QB Poster4QB Poster4
QB Poster4
 
HARBOUR ENGINEERING
HARBOUR ENGINEERING HARBOUR ENGINEERING
HARBOUR ENGINEERING
 
Civil Works Transformation
Civil Works TransformationCivil Works Transformation
Civil Works Transformation
 
Turning the Tide: Reviving the Estuary: Science, Politics, and Education
Turning the Tide: Reviving the Estuary: Science, Politics, and EducationTurning the Tide: Reviving the Estuary: Science, Politics, and Education
Turning the Tide: Reviving the Estuary: Science, Politics, and Education
 
Landscape architecture VI _hargreaves_associates.pptx
Landscape architecture  VI _hargreaves_associates.pptxLandscape architecture  VI _hargreaves_associates.pptx
Landscape architecture VI _hargreaves_associates.pptx
 

Portfolio Book 2

  • 1. pier 62/63 The redesign of Pier 62/63 on Seattle’s waterfront is a necessary change not only structurally but for the community as well. One of the main ways Seattle is defined is by the water and we are connected to it socially, economically, and environmentally. Seattle is a great urban environment, and we need a stand out urban waterfront to go with it. There has been a lot of talk and concept work done for the waterfront in its entirety, and some exciting ideas are being developed. This project deals only with the redesign of Pier 62 & 63. The goal for this new park is to provide a mixed use space that is meant for the full demographic, provides a focus on the water, and sticks to its roots while looking ahead to the future. Its main features include a 90’ high water installation that serves as public art as well as a water filtration system , a saltwater pool, a sandy ‘beach’, access to the water, picnic areas, grilling spaces, tennis courts as well as other sporting spaces, a running track, and a walkway connecting to the marina located at the next pier. The redesign also includes structural repairs that will change the timber pilings to more sustainable steel pilings. concept statement interior designer
  • 2. 1.87 acres discussed options eis report • rebuild/preservation alternative would rebuild pier 62/63 as a similar structure in the same location but set away approximately 50 feet from the shoreline. • aqua link alternative would rebuild Piers 62/63 as a smaller structure closer to the aquarium would also build a new deck connecting piers 59 and 57. this would be part of an aquarium expansion. • connector alternative would rebuild the piers as a similar structure in the same location but set away from the shoreline. it would also build a footbridge/deck connecting to the aquarium. an accessible beach between the new piers and the pier 60 would be added as well. • multi-purpose pier alternative would rebuild Piers 62/63 as a large open platform right next to an expanded aquarium and set away from the shoreline. allied-arts of seattle 62/63 • came up with the idea of the “people’s pier”, which is a family park, including an outdoor swimming pool, as well as basketball courts, public marina and a renovated concert theater. this fits in with a redesign of the whole alaskan way waterfront. public • waterfront businesses have the most inquiries about a park space with grass to be able to sit, relax, and access to the water. problem* • pier 62/63 suffers extensive timber superstructure deterioration • pile inspections show 38% of timber piles have heavy damage from fungal decay, biological deterioration, and marine borer damage, and “the piers, with their long 20% have moderate damage from these same history of commerce, labor, reasons and trade, are located on a site originally used by native pier • continued deterioration of pilings could lead to extensive use restrictions in 2-5 years, depending americans for landing their on the rate of decay boats, and were seen by the • cannot support loading requirements for large city as a new public access to events or heavy vehicles any longer the waterfront” • entire alaskan way seawall needs to be replaced -a field guide to seattle’s • overall condition of pier 62/63 was ‘fair-poor’ public art according to an engineering report from 2004 *information gathered from EIS (environmental impact statement) report for the central waterfront master parks plan from 2006 research
  • 3. 62/63 pier concept development
  • 4. a in ar m to 62/63 1 2 4 3 8 a in ar m to 6 5 pier 1. saltwater pool 2. beach 3. picnic/grill section 7 4. sports section 5. tennis courts 6. picnic/grill section 7. bike racks m 8. waterfall fixture riu ua aq to perspectives