Full details at http://www.victoria.ac.nz/chaplains/whatson/do-something-fish.html
A Human FM-sponsored DO SOMETHING! event at the VUW Anglican Chaplaincy.
www.dosomething.org.nz
Enjoy Night ≽ 8448380779 ≼ Call Girls In Gurgaon Sector 48 (Gurgaon)
DO SOMETHING! Pamela Mace on NZ fisheries management
1. New Zealand’s fisheries management system.In the context of the rest of the world Pamela Mace Chief Scientist New Zealand Ministry of Fisheries August 2010
63. Status of Stocks Below target levels Overfished or depleted Overfishing 32.5% 18.9% 25.0% New Zealand N=361 % catch from stocks of known status = 72% 67.5% 81.1% 75.0% 15.4% 22.7% United States N=519 % catch from stocks of known status = >90% 77.3% 84.6% 9
64. The state of the world’s fisheries – depends who you ask
65. Exploitation status of world’s major (target) fisheries in 2007 Major fisheries only; doesn’t include bycatch species Proportions relatively stable over last 10-15 years, after strong increasing exploitation trend in the 1970’s and 1980’s Top 10 species = 30% of capture fisheries; mostly fully-exploited or over-exploited 11 Source: FAO (2008)
93. Increased industry awareness of the need to engage and focus efforts on supporting and adhering to national and international standards
94. MSC (and other) certification schemes are making everyone aware of the desirability for healthy fisheries
95. Industry engaging more actively and positively with government and environmental groupsStill a long way to go for both New Zealand and the rest of the world to get comprehensive stakeholder buy-in
96. How you can Do Something! Obey the rules when fishing – commercial, recreational, customary Call the MFish hotline: 0800-4-POACHER if you see potential infringements Work at the local level; e.g. Regional Councils especially in the largely neglected area of the land-water interface Apply the scientific method 20
97. Apply the scientific method This means: don’t believe everything you see, hear or read, especially if its in the media sometimes balanced, sometimes not Think of alternative hypotheses In general, hypotheses can only be disproven, not proven However, the “weight of evidence” can lead scientists in one direction or another 21
Hinweis der Redaktion
Focus on commercial fisheries and their effects on marine ecosystems; there will only be scant consideration of recreation and customary fisheries
To set the stageMany components of FM systems: can’t do all of them justice in a single talk, so will be glossing over many of themNot clear about some of my facts: happy to be corrected if anyone in the audience thinks I’ve misrepresented, or made a mistake – just note the slide number and get back to me afterwards
Total land mass area of US = 9,826,675 km2USA coastline comes from CIA World fact book – is this really true?
25,000 t likely to be an inflated estimateDon’t read everything out; just highlights
Corrected some of, what were in hindsight, mistakes in the initial design of the QMS.
Last three rows = first time evaluated
FAO 2008: 28% of world’s major fisheries are depleted or recovering from depletion
Worldwide status of the stocks looks different, depending on how you count it, but right hand side is the appropriate way.Even then, not directly comparable, as this is just the 200 major stocks
Due to time constraints, need to gloss over this aspect of FM – besides, how well various countries are doing in this regard doesn’t seem to have been evaluated in the recent global comparative studies
BPAs – represent about 90% of all the areas currently under some form of protection from fishing
OK, so now I want to get to the substance of my talk:I’ve thought about this question for years; and have tended to state the criteria in numerous different ways. This is but one more iterationThird bullet point – and alternative uses of the marine environment; i.e. holistic approaches, which is beyond the scope of the present talkWill be examining how New Zealand and the US fare wrt these criteria, but the more I examined them, the more I realised I’d need several hours to do all facets justice, so I’ll just be focussing on certain aspects and omitting or glossing over others.
Negatives (generally not taken into account): Low and diminishing investment in science,Lack of development of FPs & operational management objectives & performance measures
Bullet point 2: At least that’s the case in NZ: it used to be that people thought taking more than they were supposed to was OK because you were just cheating the government which was fair game and anyway the rules were stupid; now it’s more like: “that’s my resource too and my children’s heritage that you’re pilfering”
NZ: Revolution in the form of devolution; e.g. of research responsibility to fishery managers and industry – because, it is claimed, that scientific research has not aligned with management objectives (that have yet to be defined)US: evolution – science-based annual catch limits
NZ: Revolution in the form of devolution; e.g. of research responsibility to fishery managers and industry – because, it is claimed, that scientific research has not aligned with management objectives (that have yet to be defined)US: evolution – science-based annual catch limits