3. La fragilisation du business model de la presse
• Généralisation de l’accès gratuit à
l’information
• Une concurrence des pureplayers qui
bénéficient de structure de coût plus légère et
qui sont plus ouverts à la collaboration avec
les marques ( cf Brand publishing de Webedia
ou Aufeminin)
• Des investissements lourds dans la
transformation des entreprises de presse qui
grèvent leurs résultats.
Premium publications are now
primed for ‘uberization’
As readership increases on digital screens, revenues from newsstands
diminishes
Unlimited access to information online, as well as audience fragmentation
Competition from online pureplayers, who benefit from lower cost structures
and innovative business models
Traditional media advertising is at half mast
4. Sources: eMarketer, Millward Brown, NPD Group
0:33
05:46
hours / day that
US adults spend
with digital
media
04:28 hours per day with TV
minutes / day spent watching
video on mobile in 2014, versus
0:08 in 2012
+312.5% increase in just two
years
access a second screen device
while watching live primetime TV
78%
5.7 screens per US household
More than 500 devices in US
homes connected to the internet
A world of many media screens
6. Video advertising, a rapidly
growing marketplace
2013
2014
+25% +53%
Total US Advertising Budget in Billions - USD
3.3%
Marginal
Increase in TV
3.8
5.8
17.7
22.2
Digital Display Digital Video
Sources: eMarketer
7. A huge challenge in 2020
Sources: Simulmedia, MyersBizNet Media and Marketing Investment Data and Forcasts
8. The key to uberizing TV is
OUTSTREAM VIDEO
ADVERTISING
9. creating additional, incremental premium
inventory across all screens
Outstream formats are revolutionizing
online video advertising
10. A video format for any type of content
inRead® inBoar
d
inFlow
Monetize any page, on any devise – even if there’s no video
11.
12.
13. Performance Overview | Teads Energizer
Q3 2014 Desktop
Benchmarks
Campaign Results
inRead, more viewable than the
standard
49.3%
1 sec Video
in-View %
88.9%
1 sec Video
in-View %
47.2%
2 sec Video
in-View %
76%
2 sec Video
in-View %
17.1s
In-View
time
(sec)
18.5s
In-View
time
(sec)
14. Format
Native advertising
development
Multiscreen, outstream
video advertising
Data
Targeting and
contextual relevance
mastered to the benefit
of advertisers and
publishers
Valuation of inventory
Metrics
Shifts in supply and
demand, RTB
Performance metrics
(CPV, CPCV, GRP…)
Innovation of the press
Throughout the last few years, we have witnessed young, well-funded companies completely revolutionize their industries by taking advantage of our increasing reliance on digital technology.
From grocery shopping and home cleaning to globe trotting and apartment swapping, the explosion of the “Uberized” marketplace has whittled our engagement with everyday activities into a series of simple clicks and smatphone taps. As I am certain you are all aware, companies like Netflix, AirBnB, grubHub and, of course UBER are owning this massive phenomenon.
The possibilities are endless when you take any set of laborious or awkward daily tasks, and restructure its process with digital thinking. That explains why Maurice Levy, CEO of Publicis, recently commented that everyone can be uberized.
Premium publications are not immune to this phenomenon.
Last year, The New York Times announced that its overall operating profit was $92 million, down from $156 million in 2013. This news comes alongside an additional slashing over over 100 newsroom jobs through a series of buyoffs and layoffs, and an acknoweldged steady decline in print advertising.
Yet, with NYT’s losses, opportunities for growth ensue. Revenue from an increased focus on digital advertising, particularly within the realms of mobile and video, rose to $182 million for all of 2014 – an almost 12% increase compared to the previous year.
This news is inspiring, as the number of NYT’s paid digital subscribers rose by a solid 20% from the previous year.
.
Video consumption is rising across all screens.
In 2013, US adults spent more time each day with digital media than with television. Where we choose to focus and engage our attention is growing increasingly fragmented. Consuming digital content in a nonlinear manner, using whatever screen is most convenient at any given time, is now commonplace. This trend is driven entirely by our increased reliance on mobile.
In fact, within a matter of 2 years, 312.5% more videos were viewed on mobile devises, like tablets and smartphones, per day. Compare that metric to TV’s lack of growth, where the average time spent has declined by 2.2% within that same timeframe.
The latest forecast from Forrester, the display on tablets will increase by + 40.5% per year by 2019 to represent 33% of total display in Western Europe, versus 52% for the computer and 14% for the phone.
In 2014, the share of the tablet in the display is estimated at 10% against 81% for the computer and 9% for the phone. Revenues from the tablet on display are provided nearly 4 billion in 2019 versus less than € 730 million in 2014.
This growth of mobile devices is reflected in the number of screens per household and the growth of multiscreen homes equiped with TV, PC, mobile and tablet: they represent 30% of households equipped TV. In these households, 59% of people say they use often another screen TV simultaneously. In ¾ time, this use is unrelated to TV content and therefore has weakened the attention given to programs.
This week, New York City’s Taxi & Limosine Commission released surprising figures: there are 14,088 registered Uber cars on the road, compared to the 13,587 traditional yellow cabs. For the first time ever, Uber’s black car brigade now outnumbers New York City iconic yellow cabs.
Just as traditional taxis companies are feeling the crunch of the smart ride sharing apps, TV networks are feeling threatened by the rapid emergence of digital video advertising. This is an interesting parallel. Let’s take a closer look.
Digital video advertising is a hot, hot market, evidenced by industry’s tremendous increase in digital investment year over year. According to eMarketer, digital display as a whole– including video, banner ads, and other display formats- increased by 25% from 2013 to 2014. Amid that growth, spend on online video advertising increased by whopping 53%! Compare digital video’s growth to that of TV ad spend’s, where within that same timeframe advertisers increased their spend on traditional TV network ads by just 3.3%.
What we are seeing is a persistent and strong emphasis on the value of video advertising, but a redirection of format focus. The convergence of TV and digital video advertising budgets is upon us, calling for a reorganization of media planning as we know it.
This past October, media agency holding company Omnicom publicly advised marketers to shift between 10 and 25 percent of television ad dollars to online video. In Teads’ own private conversations, we’ve seen growing interest across the board in tools that help determine the optimal reallocation of TV dollars to cross-screen campaigns.
The next reveal: As much as 50 percent of online video budgets comes from reallocated “TV” advertising budgets, and this percentage is expected to grow. But in five to 10 years, it’s likely that we won’t be talking about reallocation of video budgets. What’s presently known as the $70 billion TV market and the $7 billion digital market will be viewed as the converged, nearly $80 billion video market.
We are in an industry that is rapidly booming and bursting wtih opportunitiy for monetization and creative innocation. It’s a thrill and honor to be apart of, and we whole heartedly invite you to join us.