On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
International Standards, Practices and Supports for the Quality Assurance of Micro-credentials: Preliminary Findings
1. Session 3 – Quality Assurance Mechanisms
Professor Mark Brown
Thursday, 2nd March, 2023
EDEN Vice-President
Director, National Institute for Digital Learning
Dublin City University, Ireland
International Standards, Practices and Supports for the
Quality Assurance of Micro-credentials:
Preliminary Findings
Professor Josep Duart
EDEN President
Psychology and Education Sciences Department
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Spain
2. Why QA matters!
Survey of 510 US employers
https://upcea.edu/employers-are-all-in-on-microcredentials-survey-shows-inside-higher-ed/
3. 1
2
3
External quality assurance of micro-credentials
Institutional practices for the development and QA of micro-credentials
Institutional supports for the development of high-quality micro-credentials
Desk research supported by purposive interviews
This presentation intentionally focuses mostly outside of Europe
Study in progress
10. 1
In 22 OECD jurisdictions, we found no national framework, standards or guidelines for digital higher education,
and no evidence of a decision taken on how to approach the quality assurance of digital higher education.
2
In 3 OECD jurisdictions, we found common standards for digital and in-person teaching and learning, and evidence
of a decision to extend the application of standards for the quality assurance of in-person instruction to digital
higher education.
3
In 13 OECD jurisdictions, we identified specific standards or guidelines for digital higher education. These either
cover all types of digital education or a specific type (or types) of digital education (e.g., hybrid education).
No specific standards for digital teaching and learning
Common standards for digital and traditional study modes
Specific standards for digital higher education
2. External quality assurance
Will we find a similar number for micro-credentials?
12. 1
In ? OECD jurisdictions [still counting], we found no national framework, standards or guidelines for micro-
credentials, and no evidence of a decision taken to develop specific external quality assurance requirements.
2
In Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom, we found common standards apply for micro-credentials, and
evidence of a decision to extend the application of existing standards for their quality assurance.
3
In Malaysia, New Zealand, Ireland [and the United Kingdom], we identified a framework or specific standards or
guidelines for micro-credentials to address particular issues related to their quality assurance.
No specific quality assurance standards for micro-credentials
Common standards and quality assurance processes apply for micro-credentials
Specific standards and quality assurance processes developed for micro-credentials
2. External quality assurance
Work in progress!
15. 2. External quality assurance
https://www.nzqa.govt.nz/assets/About-us/Publications/Insights/rationale-for-micro-credentials/Aotearoa-New-Zealands-rationale-for-micro-credentials.pdf
Does not include
universities
21. 2. External quality assurance
• Management, Staffing and
Administration
• Teaching, Learning and
Assessment
• Participant support
• Facilities
• Premises and facilities in the
case of face-to-face delivery
Standards and Indicators
https://www.the-bac.org/micro-credentials-pilot-scheme/
34. Questions for discussion
What is happening in other European countries regarding
the external quality assurance of micro-credentials?
Do you know of any mature European institutional
examples of quality assurance practices for micro-
credentials?
What do learners need to know about external and
institutional quality assurance practices for micro-
credentials?