Presentation on the Energy Efficiency in schools: a learning oportunity workshop held in Coimbra on the 17 of June 2010. This presentation is about the work done by the Metropolia University of Helsinky on energy efficiency in schools.
2. Content of Presentation:
Start End Description of Item Slides
Save Energy Helsinki Pilot
Objectives, Energy Audits (Katri Kuusinen), Time
schedule
Implementation, Pilot Design Work, Working Groups
Living Lab Methodologies
Main Achievements
Next Steps
Some Displays
3. SAVE ENERGY
1.3.2008 – 31.8.2011
4.46 M€
EU / FP7 / CIP / ICT / PSP - 2008
EU / FP7 European Union, Framework Programme 7
CIP, Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme
ICT, Information and Communication Technology
PSP, Policy Support Programme
1. Call for Proposals: closed 26.06.2008
2. Call for Proposals: closed 05.09.2008
Approval 16.10.2008
Asko Kippo
26.04.2010
4. Objectives: Annex 1 - A1.4 2
The project will demonstrate the substantial Energy Savings
20 % from energy consumption transformation behaviour
5 % from smart ICT energy management that can be
achieved in public buildings through the use of services
enabled by ICT in particular by supporting the user
transformation behaviour.
The social acceptability of energy efficiency will be enabled
by the motivated education of the users, playing the SAVE
ENERGY Serious Game in different creative and
compelling settings.
Furthermore, the eco-conscious educated user will be
empowered with real time ubiquitous information and
decision making guidance that will enable and motivate the
interaction leading to energy efficiency.
5. Save Energy
Main Objectives, Annex 1 – B1.1.3
1. Save Energy Pilots
2. Save Energy ICT Management System
3. Real Time Information on Energy Consumption
4. Save Energy Serious Game
5. User Behaviour Transformation
6. Policy Recommendations and Save Energy
Advisory Board
7. Proactive Dissemination
6. Asko Kippo
Project Manager
Helsinki Metropolia UAS
City of Helsinki
Centre of Premises; Director Pekka
Hapuoja, Juha Haapasalo, Jukka Järvenranta, Helsinki School of Economics/CKIR
Kari Niittymäki, Erkki Pihkoluoma, Director Seija Kulkki, Riina Utriainen, Ben
Education Dept: Paula Tähtinen, Airi Cowley, Lasse Sariola, NN2
Rintamäki, Susanna Sarvanto
Public Work Dept; Katri Kuusinen, Pälvi Green Net Finland ry
Holopainen, Timo Posa, Toivo Sahlsten Managing Director Lauri Hietaniemi, Anu
Palmia Food Services: Jaana Kujala Hassinen, Suvi Häkämies, Arto Haakana
Ala-Malmi Comprehensive School
Principal Rita Huhtala Nokia Oyj
Teachers; Snellman, Makkonen, Pajunen, Director Veli-Pekka Niitamo
Tiainen
Janitor; Heikkinen Helsinki Metropolia University of
Pupils; Aikio, Kujala, Pirttioja, Tanskanen, Applied Sciences
Zec Teachers; Kai Virta, Tapio Kallasjoki, Riitta
Pihkapuisto Comprehensive School Lehtinen, Jukka Pirinen, Antero Putki-
(low level) ranta, Kaija Haapasalo, Matti Peltoniemi
Principal Pirkko Kaskinen Eng.Students: Matti Olin, Ville Olkkonen,
Teachers; Huurre, Grohn, Hast, Samuli Rasinmäki, Anssi Ulmanen, Jussi
Mäntyniemi, Oikarinen, Vuorio Känsälä, + kitchen logistics group (15
Janitor Ortela students)
Pupils: NN, NN
7. Development of Helsinki Pilot Applications
City of Helsinki Engineering departments involved at
Authorities & Helsinki Metropolia UAS
Departments comprehensive
schools, Electricity
180 units Bio- & Food Automation
City Real Estate Lighting techology
Department Production
Kitchen Logistics
Public Works
Department Lighting operation &
Business
Group food Logistics
Education Ala-Malmi services
department
Palmia Food
Services PC-
HVAC
Pihkapuisto
Classroom
Group
Group
Companies, subsuppliers,
consultants: Automation
Beijers, HK-Instruments, Pöyry, Computer
There, ISA, Produal, Philips, tech
Building Tech
Osram, Process Vision,
Nomovok, Meshworks Wireless, Mobile tech
Arealtec, YIT, Fazer Amica
8. Save Energy Applications:
Electricity
Electricity
Energy
Energy
Real time ICT/Building
automation system Lighting
Lighting Efficiency:
Efficiency:
§Saving Energy
§Saving Energy
Energy Saving Serious
Game §Change of Behavior
§Change of Behavior
§Learning
§Learning
Wireless §Best Practices
Measurements HVAC
HVAC §Best Practices
§Dissemination
§Dissemination
Climate change
Climate change
CO22
CO
User behaviour
10. Energy Audit Report; October 2009
Distribution of Energy consumption
Ala-Malmi Pihkapuisto
Group of consumption: MWh/a % MWh/a %
Heating group
Heating 912 67 66 17
Ventilation 433 32 287 76
Heated water 22 2 27 7
Total 1367 101 380 100
Electricity group
Internal lighting 52 17 62 22
External lighting 18 6 10 4
HVAC-equipment 130 42 127 45
Kitchen equipment 53 17 51 18
PC equipment 36 12
Plugged equipment 0 0 19 7
Elevators, lifting equipment 0 0 5 2
Electrically heated equipment 0 0 0 0
Other equipment 18 6 6 2
Total 307 100 280 100
11. Helsinki Pilot: Time Schedule,
updated 30.5.2010:
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Months 1 - 12 Months 13 - 18 Months 19-30
2009 2010 2011
Tasks: 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
1. Living Lab User design
and discussions
2. Project Design & Man.
3. Techn. Design & Install.
Of Lighting applications
4. Energy & HVAC audits
5. Server & Database &
data transmission
6. Wireless sensor network
7. Installation of sensors
8. Kitchen Evaluation
9. User Interfaces
(Displays)
10. Pilot Testing, Follow up
& User motivation, Best
Practices
12. Helsinki Pilot:
Collaboration and Co‐operation
towards Implementation
Users: Ideas, S
Teachers, pupils Evaluation
Proposals A
V
Technical E
Action
Experts Evaluation
Plan
E
Historical Data: N
Made Energy Project Implementation of E
Audits Plan the Pilots and Game R
G
Supporting Y
Companies Investment
Plan
13. Behavioural changes ?
Living Lab metodology ?
Users to be involved in all phases ?
3.
Peer Evaluation,
1.
Validation,
Problem Evaluation
Checking,
Design,
Best Practicies,
Defination,
Publicity,
Priority,
Change of Thinking,
User requirements
Change of Understanding
Change of Behavior
2.
Teaching,
Learning by Doing,
Experimentation,
Testing,
Participation,
Cooperation
Collaboration
14. Who are the users at the pilots ?
Pupils
Others Teachers
Users and
Subsuppliers Janitors
the key users ?
Kitchen
Management
personnel
Service
men
Can they really effect on saving energy at the pilot ?
15. Helsinki Workgroups and Teams
Helsinki Project
Group
Other Partners
Serious Game
Nokia/Process Vision
Aalto/HSE/CKIR Green Net Finland
Technical Team Development Group
User Teams
City of Helsinki Metropolia UAS
Ala-Malmi School Server, Communication,
Janitor, Teachers, School Masters Database, User Interface
Pupils, kitchen staff students & experts
Pihkapuisto School Electricity, Lighting,
Electricity / Lighting
Janitor, Teachers, Automation, HVAC
experts
Pupils, kitchen staff Students & experts
ICT & Automation Subsupplier: MWW
expert Wireless sensor network
Energy and HVAC Ala-Malmi BM&A System
experts YIT Ltd, CiTech
Pihkapuisto BM&A System
Arealtec Ltd, Trend
16. User Groups at Schools
USER GROUPS
Responsible on
energy consumption
Ala-Malmi School Pihkapuisto School
School Master, Janitor,
School Master, Janitor,
- the whole school, gym,
- The whole school
entrance hall
Kitchen Staff, Kitchen Staff,
- Kitchen operations - kitchen operations
Pupils in classrooms, Pupils in classrooms,
Teachers, Teachers,
- Electricity of lighting, water - Electricity of lighting, water
17. Living Lab methodology / User involvement
Ideas, problem R&D, design, Supervision,
Experiment, tests
defination development Follow up
Real problems Evaluation New learning Continuous
Discussions Argumentation Understanding improvements
Small things Priority Increased eco- Updates
Small steps Choice conscious Feedback
Listen sensitively Improvements New experience Validation
Problem solution New behaviour Reports
User Benefit, profit Displays
requirements Recommendations
Best Practices
Changing user’s attitude and behaviour and the new way of
thinking, living, working within energy saving
18. Living Lab methodology / Behavioral change
Motivation of the Display units, Permanent
Checking
user web pages change
Rewards Measurements, Checkpoints, Continuous
More real time Trends, Tests, improvements
information Comparisions Everyone Saving results for
Lectures,teaching Statistics, committed the users (partly)
, understanding, Conclusions, Quiz, Reports
small steps, Instructions, Peer evaluation, Recommendations
Competition Alternatives, Savings, Best Practices
Personal goals, Choices Results
Publicity Right direction
Results, earning New setpoints
Accurate tuning
Feedback, check, evaluation of the results
19. Change of Behavior and Operation
Interest to change, being aware
Present skills Eager to learn, desire to change & learn
and knowledge
Serie of lecture,
distribution of Object lessons, alternatives, commitment
information
ICT system, Peer evaluation,
Serious Game, understanding
Learning by
Doing
Work Groups, new values,
Teams, Quiz, attitudes,
Demos operations
Follow up,
Continuous
Improvement
20. User based Collaboration in Helsinki Pilot
Application Role of Role of Role of Problem Technical Solution
teachers pupils other
persons
Lights at Manual Follow up of Operation 20 units a’ 150 smart solution for lighting
Entrance control of energy and W lamps are system (new lamp groups,
Hall lighting consumption maintenance continuously sensor based system, new
and lighting on lamp technology), users
learn by displays
Gym HVAC Designing Follow up of HVAC HVAC system New and modern sensor
the use of energy control functions based control EC-motor
Gym with consumption according to poorly, under- system for HVAC, users
HVAC and HVAC the users in capable learn by displays
gym system
Classrooms Manual Follow up of Operation Unnecessary Reduced unnecessary
PC classes control of energy and use of lighting usage by intelligent sensor
(several) lighting and consumption maintenance and power, based systems, users learn
power supply and lighting poor quality of by displays
air
Corridors Manual or Manual Operation Unnecessary Reduce the unnecessary
sensor based control if and use of lighting use of lighting by sensors
control of needed maintenance
lighting
Energy Operational Participation Energy Uneconomical Evaluation and design of the
Saving at development in design and economical use of kitchen developments of the
Kitchen and logistic evaluation development logistics and food service
plan of the kitchen
21. Saving Energy by the user
behavioral change
The key objectives of the Helsinki pilot is to measure in
real time all the relevant energy information on the
consumed electricity, heat and water consumption
by using the new high-tech wireless sensor network
system,
by transferring the data from the existing building
management system and
from the separate transferable measurement units.
All the measurements have been collected to the virtual
server generating the instructions to save energy and
the simple and understandable displays to the users at the
schools (kitchen personal, janitor, teachers, pupils,
technical experts) in order to achieve the permanent
behavioral change in saving the energy.
22. Activities for users:
User Group/ Pupils 7 –
Pupils 12 - 16 Janitor Teachers
Activity 12 y
Serie of lecture Yes Yes
Workshop/seminar Yes
Green Board of
Yes
pupils
Quiz Yes Yes Yes Yes
Questionnaires Yes Yes Yes Yes
Theme day, week Yes Yes Yes
Follow up of energy
Yes Yes
consumtion at home
Work groups, teams Yes Yes Yes
Learning by doing
Yes Yes Yes Yes
activities, Displays
Final Quiz
Yes Yes
competition
Conference, rewards Yes
23. Validation of Implementation, User behaviour
Problem Evaluation Define Evaluation Acceptance
Implementation
Defination Priorization Solution Validation to use
Measurements Use of ICT system
Frequency to Daily, weekly ?
measure Teaching, learning
Interfaces to BM&AS Motivation, tasks, quiz,
Server, Database interviews, commitment
Data transmission Team works,Competition
Checking, validation Personal targets, homes,
User interface personalization, parents
Displays Increased awareness
Social media, blogs
Development
Users Experts Users, Experts
Group
24. To change the behaviour, do we need more ?
Team working
Clubs
Web 2.0 tools
Quiz
Learning/Teaching, Demos
Learning by doing Measurements
Simple tasks
Instructions
Advices
More publicity Reports
Displays
Shock impact Trends
Comparisions
Statistics
Public lectures Existing examples
Theme weeks High level persons Pilot results
Workshops To be involved Co-operation
Seminars
Conferences
25. Kitchen is a big consumer !
Professional public kitchen
In Finland there were about 22.000 professional public kitchens in 2008
Of which more than 9.000 (42 %) were preparing 200 meals per day
Of which more than 4.600 (21 %) were distribution & heating kitchens
without own production
Besides there were about 1.600 central kitchens preparing meal
portions for distribution & heating kitchens and for homes
At Ala-Malmi and Pihkapuisto, there is a very small personnel, only 2 – 3
persons, who can effect on the energy consumption at the kitchen by
The working methods in each phase (maturing effectively)
The correct timing, filling the owens and using all the machines
properly
The kitchens (having several really high power machines) are consuming
about 20 % of the total electricity energy at schools
26. Evaluation of the kitchen energy consumption at
Ala-Malmi and Pihkapuisto
The goals (from the energy saving point of view):
To analyse present food preparation methods and the use
(timing, filling) of equipment and machines
To analyse user logistic operations at the kitchen
To evaluate potential energy savings
To evaluate possible proposals of standard developments,
improvements and efficiency in the food preparation and in
dining (preservation, preparation of food, waiting, dining,
returning dishes, washing and cleaning)
To find out best practices to save energy at the kitchen
27. The evaluation has a critical eye on :
The cost savings (water, electricity and heat energy
consumption) notifying also the environmental and hygienic
issues and the valid standards, instructions, laws and
decrees.
Appropriate operations at kitchen and activities and
knowledge of the personnel to use the equipment correctly
Efficient and appropriate level of equipment (new
technology) available at the kitchen (inductive owen,
combined owen, intelligent combi pot, maturing processes,
high speed freesing, energy economic washing machine,
etc.
Ventilation of the kitchen room
28. Kitchen evaluation / Organisation
Man.Group: Palmia, Fazer Amica:
Education Dept, Real Estate Dept,
Public Works Dept., Metropolia
Kitchen Operators:
Expert Group:
Ala-Malmi: Master of kitchen
Technical & Kitchen designers
Pihkapuisto: Master of kitchen
Customer Group:
Teachers, pupils
Student Project mng
Ari Mäenpää
G1, Food technology G2, Production Logistics
Teacher: Ulriikka Savela-Huovinen Teacher: Antero Putkiranta
Student team leader: Antero Juvani Student team leader:Matti Saloranta
G3, Business Logistics G4; Automation
Teacher: Kaija Haapasalo Teachers: T.Tuominen, K.Virta
Student team leader:Henrik Ollikainen Student team leader:Seppo Luong
29. Time schedule of evaluation of the kitchens:
Evaluation of the kitchens at 20092010
Ala-Malmi and Pihkapuisto November December January February
Tasks for 15 students; week: 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. Project plan, time schedule
2. Web questionnaire
3. Experiment design
4. Group1, Food techn., 4h/week
5. Group 2, Prod.Logist. 4h/week
6. Group 3, Bus.Logist., 4h/week
7. Group 4, Automation, 4h/week
8. Theme interviews
9. Project meeting weekly
10. Proj.Man.Group meeting
11. Final Report
12. Final Seminar, Results
13. Kitchen Workshop 3/2010
30. Kitchen operation, food services and logistics
Analyzed and designed by Metropolia student groups:
Evaluation the Evaluation and Recommended New way of
Present design the new changes, operation in
Operations in energy saving discussions, kitchens and
kitchen and dining and logistic way argumentation, new dining
logistics to operate decisions logistics
Material flows Material handling Raw materials Efficient use of
Filling machines Owens handling, tools equipment
Using electrical Frigerators Preparation, Saving Energy
equipment Service tables, services, after Better service
Timing of food warming care (cleaning) logistics
preparation, Washing machine Logistics, Better quality,
services, cleaning Water usage, circulation, timing customer
Dining; distribution, temperature Best practices satisfaction
logistical chain, Waste treatment Quality,
timing Cleaning & standards,
teading regulations
Standards,
regulations, safety
31. High power machines in kitchen
The most important equipment at
Ala-Malmi's kitchen max power (kW)
Combined owen 34,40
Elecricity-steam convection owen 17,50
Pressurised cooker 36,00
Electric stove 10,00
Washing line 32,30
Pot 17,00
Frigerator 0,65
Frigerator 0,65
Washing line connected into heated water
32. From food preparing to energy consumption
Laws, decrees, Customers, Dining room, Equipment,
Instructions, Pupils, Spaces Machines,
Orders Teachers Study plan Users
Schedules
Menu Purchases Food preparation Energy consumption
Education Service Service Service
Dept. Producer Producer Producer
36. Ideas of Development (1/2)
– Preparing the food:
• When using the kitchen machine, use them correctly
• When to switch the kitchen equipment on ?
• Use only the shallow palets for food preparation in the owen
• Benefit the after heat in the owen
• Maintenance of the kitchen equipment is important to keep them
in good condition
– Serve the food effectively
• It will be more effective when the 2 dining set ups are very close to
each others
– Other
• HVAC should be switched off automatically
37. Energy efficient professional kitchen
Frigerator and Freezer Owen
Keep the doors closed Check the maturing devices
Freezer device is not a cold storage Clean up immediately after the usage
Combined owen Serving equipment
Get acquainted with the Use the hot water
characteristics of the equipment Switch it on about 30 – 50 min
Modify the old receipts according to before serving
the new equipment
Dishing machine
Benefit the after heat
Feed it correctly
Use only full palettes
Dried dirty dishes should be first pre
washed
”Kouluta, opasta ja vaadi.” ”Energia tehokkaan toiminnan ydin on oikea aikaisuus”
38. Ideas of Development (2/2)
– LayOut
• Reorganize the dining room.
– Economic responsibility to the Food Operator
• The Food Operator should be responsible for the born costs of the
water and electricity consumption
– Menu
• Healthy and cheap food, what about the preparation of the food and
energy efficiency ?
– Lighting
• Benefit the day light as much as possible
– R&D tips for the manufacturer of the kitchen equipment
• Vertically flexibly moving shallow door for owen would also save
energy
39. Save Energy / Saving potentials in Kitchen
Proposals of Developments dealing with kitchen Equipment and
food preparation
1 Using effectively the after heat in the owens
2 Limiting the unnecessary use of high power equipment
3 Using mainly the shallow palets in food preparation
4 Loading the high power equipment properly and effectively
5 Replaced investment of the old and energy consuming equipment
6 The effects of Menus on energy consumption
7 Food operator (Fazer Amica, Palmia) should have more
responsibility on the consumption costs of electricity and water
8 Logistical effluency and timing at schools
9 Equipment training for users, scheduled maintenence
40. How to activate the users ?
Much greater energy savings could be achieved by changing the
user’s energy saving habits than by technical solutions
Real time information about the energy consumption giving to
the user with the display unit
Giving instructions to users about correct and appropriate use
of lighting
The users get acquainted with the new lighting technology and
transfer this information outside the school
42. Energy consumption based on lighting:
In Finland all the lighting is consuming about 10 % of the total
available energy (Motiva, 2009).
Lighting at school building is consuming the energy more than 20
%.
Large amount of lighting
Unefficient control methods
The lights are on with full power all the day
How to save energy in lighting ?
Correct amount of light, in right time, into right place
Energy efficient and lifelong lamps and interfaces
Use highly profitable (beneficial) lighting
Use control actively (based on motion, daylight, tasks, etc.)
EuP directive 2005/32/EC removes incandescent lighting away
43. 1. Pihkapuisto, old part;
Multisensor lighting at the classroom:
q The lights at the classroom are controlled by using multisensors
including a light sensor and a motion detector.
q Depending on the availability of daylight the light sensor (photocell
sensor) automatically reduces/increaces the amount of electrical
lighting and keeps the illuminance level constant.
q The motion detector switches the lights off when the classroom is
vacated (set to switch the lights off after 10 min. of absence).
q Two multisensor units are mounted into the luminaires. These master
luminaires controls the illuminance level of the slave luminaires that
are on the same row/luminaire group. The luminaires are equiped with
T5 45 W and 25 W fluorescent tubes and electronic ballasts (DALI).
q The calculated energy consumption is about 439 kWh/a (assesment
mady by using standard EN 15193, typical values for a classroom).
44. Lighting Applications in Helsinki Pilot
Equipment Energy
N:o of
School Pilot cons.
rooms
(kWh/a)
Ala-Malmi 3 Pavillion 1; reference T5 35 W / 25 W 1 129
3 Pavillion 2; multisensors T5 35 W / 25 W 677
3 Pavillion 3; movement sensors T5 35 W / 25 W 677
Pihkapuisto 1 Lighting with multisensors T5 45 W / 25 W 439
1 Lighting with movement detectors T8 51 W 587
1 Reference class 1 T8 36 W 994
1 Reference class 2 T8 58 W 823
Entrance hall regrouped 21 * 150 W 3 709
49. Ala‐Malmi Measurements from BM&A system
Ala-Malmi From CiTech/YIT: Frequency
The whole school:
1 Total heat energy consumption kWh 1 /hour CiTech YIT
2 Total water consumption m3 1 /hour CiTech YIT
Total el.energy consumption at
3 school kWh 1 /hour CiTech YIT
4 Energy consumption of Gym kWh 1 /hour CiTech YIT
Gym: 1 /hour CiTech YIT
5 Gym; Temperature oC 1 /hour CiTech YIT
6 Gym; CO2-content ppm 1 /hour CiTech YIT
7 Gym; Moisture % 1 /hour CiTech YIT
Outside (Open air) 1 /hour CiTech YIT
8 External Conditions Temperature oC 1 /hour CiTech YIT
9 External Conditions Moisture % 1 /hour CiTech YIT
50. Number of real time measurements
Ala-Malmi Pihkapuisto
Pilot Application n:o of n:o of n:o of n:o of
rooms measurements rooms measurements
Classrooms 9 36 4 16
Kitchen 1 4 1 4
Dining room 1 4 1 6
Gym hall 1 4
Entrance hall 1 4
Consumption of electricty 4 5
Total wireless measurements 48 39
Measurements from Trend BM&AS 15
Measurements from CiTech BM&AS 6
Total 54 54
51. Frequency of measurements
n:o of Communication Frequency of
System measurements protocoll measurement
Meshworks Wireless (MWW) 87 ZigBee/GPRS/ 2 min / 5 min
XML
Trend BM&AS / PIhkapuisto 15 SQL queries 5 min
CiTech BM&AS / Ala-Malmi 6 FTP 60 min
To iCenter / ISA 12 XML 24 h
54. Payback time of the investment of the HVAC machine
Investment Euro
HVAC EC machines (2 units) 5 000
Installation work 6 312
Electricity and automation 10 000
Total 21 312
Savings 2 899
Payback time 7,3 years
Source: Toivo Sahlsten, HKR
55. Strategies on saving energy:
New replacement investement:
New replacement investement:
Renewing totally the old equipment or
Renewing totally the old equipment or
system to new, modern, energy efficient
system to new, modern, energy efficient
equipment or system
equipment or system
New Eco/Green devices:
New Eco/Green devices:
Replacing the old energy consuming
Replacing the old energy consuming
lamps and lighting equipment to new
lamps and lighting equipment to new
sensor based eco-lightings
sensor based eco-lightings
Saving Energy
Saving Energy
Tuning and controlling the BM&AS:
Tuning and controlling the BM&AS:
Setting, tuning, reducing and controlling
Setting, tuning, reducing and controlling
all possible setpoints at the BM&AS
all possible setpoints at the BM&AS
towards more energy efficient level
towards more energy efficient level
Increase to show the real time
Increase to show the real time
information:
information:
Increasing to show the real time
Increasing to show the real time
information, making it understandable,
information, making it understandable,
interesting, teaching, testing and
interesting, teaching, testing and
committing the users
committing the users
56. Potential savings by LL methods
Total Saving in Saving in Place Saving examples by Living Lab methods
Consumpt Electricity Electricty from
MWh/a Consumpt consumpt. The Energy Audit Recommendations
% MWh/a
52 10 % 5.2 A-M Internal Lighting Applications in the whole
school
57 5% 5 A-M Switching off the unused electrical appliances
( AV equipment, kitchen equipment, washing
machines, technical equipment, etc)
33 60 % 13 A-M Switching off the unused PCs & printers, 100
pcs
25 55 % 13 Pp Energy Efficient HVAC EC-Machine in
Pihkapuisto Gym (implemented 10/2009)
57. Energy Saving Proposals from Energy Audit Report
Present Proposed Saving School Pilot Applications
value value
7.6 m3/h 3.2 m3/h 62 % Pp The reduction of the flow rate of the remote
heat
06.00-18.00 07.00-17.30 13 % A-M The shortening of the running time of the HVAC
o’clock o’clock Pp machines 201TK, 203TK ja 204TK by one hour
23 oC 19 oC 12 % Pp The reduction of the incoming temperature of
the air of the HVAC machine 201TK (the whole
school)
21 oC 18 oC 10 % - A-M The reduction of the incoming temperature of
27 oC 30 % Pp the air of the HVAC machine 202TK
23 oC (classrooms), 203TK (pavillion 1), 204TK
(pavillion 2), 205TK (pavillion 3), 208TK, TK1/94
19 oC
50 % A-M The reduction of the flow rate of the consumed
40 % Pp water with the eco-valves
-26.3 oC -18 oC 20 % A-M The increase of the temperature of the freezer
58. The city of Helsinki owns
public buildings
q The city of Helsinki owns about 1.200 public
buildings including 200 school buildings, 350
kindergartens and 7 hospitals, office buildings,
libraries, etc.
59.
60.
61. Pihkapuisto elementary school
Outdoor conditions
Monthly mean outdoor air temperature (priority 2)
CIP‐ICT‐PSP‐238882 PROJECT Ke 17.3.2010 14:30
62. Pihkapuisto elementary school
Outdoor and indoor air temperature (priority 2)
CIP‐ICT‐PSP‐238882 PROJECT Ke 17.3.2010 14:30
63. Pihkapuisto elementary school
Kitchen
Daily cumulative electricity consumption of the kitchen equipments
CIP‐ICT‐PSP‐238882 PROJECT Ke 17.3.2010 14:30
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71. Wed 10.3.2010 2:30 pm
Ala‐Malmi elementary school: mobile
Wed 10.3.2010 2:30 pm
Wed 10.3.2010 2:30 pm Wed 10.3.2010 2:30 pm
Wed 10.3.2010 2:30 pm Wed 10.3.2010 2:30 pm
Wed 10.3.2010 2:30 pm
Pihkapuisto elementary school: kitchen
Pihkapuisto elementary school: kitchen Pihkapuisto elementary school
Pihkapuisto elementary school Pihkapuisto elementary school
Pihkapuisto elementary school
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
kWh Electrical energy kWh kW Current active power kW
consumption consumption
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
< ? A < 35 A
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ? ‐ ? B 35 ‐
55
B
? ‐ ?
C ? 55 ‐
75
C 73
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
? ‐ ? D 75
100
D
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ? ‐ ?
E 100 ‐
130
E
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
? ‐ ? F 130 ‐
170
F
> ? G > 170 G