1. tio n:
me nta nt,
A rgu me
rgu s &
fA
ts o Claim
Par of
pe s as on
Ty s to Re
W ay sition
II
Co mpo n
e Brow
olleg ry
1 2–C Mau
E NG 1 Prof .
Parts adapted from a PowerPoint by Gretchen Starks-Martin
St. Cloud State University, Minnesota

2.  To rec
elem ognize t
ents he
s:  To rec of an argu
argu ognize t men
nin g
men ypes t
ct ive
 To eva ts of
luate
 To rec
Le ar
argu
men
Obj e
logic ogni ts
al re ze er
ason rors in
ing

3. n
 An arg
?
t is a
m en t
gume
 Logic nt pr
esen
al re ts:
A ccu r
ason
s&
Wha
ate,
a rgu
evid
ence relevant
 To sup
or C port a V
laim iewp
. oint

4.  ISSUE
cont - probl
r e
peop oversy a m or
le di bout
 CLAIM sagree which
the i - the
ssue posi
 SUPPO tion
on
of an
t evid RT - re
e a
reaso nce that sons an
m en
d
acce nable an the claim
pted d sho i
 R E F UT uld b s
Parts
e
Arg u
view ATIO
poin N - op
 REBUT t(s) posi
ng
the r TAL – c
efuta ount
tion ering

5.  CLAIM
state MO
F FA
men
prov t tha CT -
en o t can
l aim s
obse r ver be
rvati ified
 “Withi on or reseby
destr n ten yea arch
of C
uctio rs,
will c n of r
ause ain fo
plan
t and hundred rests
spec anim s of
s
ies to al
T ype
extin beco
ct.” me

6.  CLAIM
state MO
F VA
s tha
idea t o n e LU E -
l aim s
is be thing
desir tter o
able r mo or
 “Requ than anothre
ser vi iring com er.
of C
ce in mun
prod high ity
uce m scho
comm ore ol wi
unity ll
s
grad
uates -aware
T ype
.”

7.  CLAIM
sugg MO
F PO
ests
ough what LICY -
l aim s
t to b shou
a pro e do ld or
blem ne to
 “To re . solve
viole duce sch
of C
nce, ool
dete gun
ctors and
insta shou meta
lled ld be l
s
camp on c o
T ype
uses llege
.”

8.  R E A SO
state ON - a g
claimment tha eneral
. t sup
 EVIDE ports
rt
NCE a
facts
upp o expe , stat - cons
istics ists o
and riences, , f
exam com
why p
the c ples tha arisons
 EMOT laim is vat show ,
s of S
idea IONAL lid .
s
towa that are APPEALS
that rd needs targeted -
Ty pe
read
care ers a or value
abou re lik s
t. ely t
o

9. hes am
reac n fro
VE - lusio
CTI onc
Dedu
Dedu
 INDU ral c fics.
e
en rved s
g e peci , has
lete
Indu Argume
Induc Argume
obs n atha. By
ny, a min ance
ctive
ctive
nthoal sta perform
“A sic
 hy ving the ber of
ctive
p er
tive a
o bs arge numould etes
a l s, you c all athl ina.”
of ete
thl lude that ical stam
and
a c
nd
on ss phys
c se
pos re
nts
nts
o th e mo te,
p ecific t gle athlentil
the sral; a sin nother uon.
rom e a i
R son fand gen ete and conclus
ea d thl a
broanother a can draw
a you
then

10. ith a
i ns w es
Dedu
Dedu
- beg mov
TIVE se and c
DUC remi ecifi mise.
Indu Argume
Induc Argume
 DE r p
jo
ma rd a mo in re sp or pre
ctive
ctive
towa ment or
m sical s
s phy ony i
ctive
state sses Anth
tive a
o
le tes p cause sses
s
 “Ath ina. Be must po
stam hlete, he ina.”
and
nd
a n at al stam
ph ysi c
nts
nts
or
alization n
ag ener and the
on from umption lar case
Reas is or ass particu
hes e or
hypot o a singl
it t
apply